Understanding the Impact of Radical Innovation on Innovator Attitudes, Attributes, and Innovation-Decision Process

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Understanding the Impact of Radical Innovation on Innovator Attitudes, Attributes, and Innovation-Decision Process Pepperdine University Pepperdine Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations 2016 Understanding the impact of radical innovation on innovator attitudes, attributes, and innovation-decision process: a case study of the Pulaski Academy football program's adoption of radical innovations Lyall J. Swim Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/etd Recommended Citation Swim, Lyall J., "Understanding the impact of radical innovation on innovator attitudes, attributes, and innovation-decision process: a case study of the Pulaski Academy football program's adoption of radical innovations" (2016). Theses and Dissertations. 745. https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/etd/745 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Pepperdine University Graduate School of Education and Psychology UNDERSTANDING THE IMPACT OF A RADICAL INNOVATION ON INNOVATOR ATTITUDES, ATTRIBUTES, AND INNOVATION-DECISION PROCESS: A CASE STUDY OF THE PULASKI ACADEMY FOOTBALL PROGRAM’S ADOPTION OF RADICAL INNOVATIONS A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education in Organizational Leadership by Lyall J. Swim December, 2016 Kay Davis, Ph.D. – Dissertation Chairperson This dissertation, written by Lyall J. Swim under the guidance of a Faculty Committee and approved by its members, has been submitted to and accepted by the Graduate Faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION Doctoral Committee: Kay Davis, Ed.D., Chairperson John McManus, Ph.D. Barbara Mather, Ph.D. © Copyright by Lyall J. Swim (2016) All Rights Reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... vii DEDICATION ............................................................................................................................. viii VITA ............................................................................................................................................... x ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................. xiii Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Statement of the Problem/Issues ......................................................................................... 2 Purpose of the Study ........................................................................................................... 5 Theoretical Framework ....................................................................................................... 7 Definition of Relevant/Key Terms ...................................................................................... 9 Case Setting ...................................................................................................................... 13 Role of the Researcher ...................................................................................................... 13 Importance of the Study .................................................................................................... 14 Summary ........................................................................................................................... 16 Chapter 2: Review of Literature ................................................................................................... 17 The Diffusion of Innovations Framework ........................................................................ 17 The Innovation .................................................................................................................. 18 Communication Channels ................................................................................................. 29 Time .................................................................................................................................. 33 Social System .................................................................................................................... 48 Criticisms of Rogers’ Framework ..................................................................................... 56 Additional Theories & Frameworks ................................................................................. 58 Summary ........................................................................................................................... 63 Chapter 3: Methods ....................................................................................................................... 65 Study Design ..................................................................................................................... 65 Minimizing Researcher Bias ............................................................................................. 68 Overview of the Case ........................................................................................................ 69 Data Sources ..................................................................................................................... 72 Interview Protocol ............................................................................................................. 74 Human Subjects Considerations ....................................................................................... 75 Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 76 Presentation of Findings ................................................................................................... 78 Chapter 4: Report of the Findings ................................................................................................. 79 Interviewee Demographics & Artifact Summary ............................................................. 80 Case Timeline ................................................................................................................... 84 v Theme 1: The Attributes of the Innovation ....................................................................... 92 Theme 2: Innovation Perceptions ..................................................................................... 95 Theme 3: Attributes and Attitudes of the Innovators ........................................................ 98 Theme 4: Attributes of Pulaski and the Football Program ............................................. 104 Theme 5: Innovation-Decision Process .......................................................................... 110 Theme 6: Leadership Style of the Lead Innovator .......................................................... 120 Chapter 5: Study Conclusions, Implications and Recommendations ......................................... 125 Issue & Study Significance ............................................................................................. 126 Theoretical Framework ................................................................................................... 128 Methods ........................................................................................................................... 129 Key Findings ................................................................................................................... 130 Conclusions & Implications ............................................................................................ 137 Recommendations for Further Research ......................................................................... 143 Study Limitations ............................................................................................................ 144 Internal Validity .............................................................................................................. 145 Closing Commentary ...................................................................................................... 146 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................... 148 APPENDIX A: Interview Protocol ............................................................................................. 163 APPENDIX B: IRB Approval .................................................................................................... 165 APPENDIX C: Innovator Characteristics of Coach Kevin Kelley ............................................. 167 APPENDIX D: Innovator Characteristics of Pulaski Players ..................................................... 169 APPENDIX E: Unintended Consequences Summary ................................................................ 171 vi LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1. 2014 Opening Day Payrolls .............................................................................................. 4 Table 2. Summary of Influences, Inhibitors and Facilitators of Diffusion ................................... 47 Table 3. Comparison of Diffusion Research Results by Topic on Worldcat.org ........................
Recommended publications
  • Harnessing the Innovation Opportunities of Novel Technologies and Technological Change
    Business Research Methodologies and the need for Economies of Scale in the Business Research Process: Harnessing the Innovation Opportunities of Novel Technologies and Technological Change Chris William Callaghan University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa [email protected] DOI: 10.34190/JBRM.17.3.007 Abstract: Theory and evidence suggests that returns to research and research and development are currently declining. This paper seeks to identify patterns in the use of business research methodologies in certain of the latest articles published at the forefront of the field of business research innovation, from its leading journal. This literature is used to identify the current front line of business research methodologies at the forefront of the field. Propositions are derived from novel theory, and are critically juxtaposed against identified topics and methodologies in these articles. In so doing, the conceptual distance of the front line of empirical research in the field from the radical front line of theory in the broader field is quantified. Methodological implications are discussed and recommendations are made for the development of a future research agenda. Keywords: Research methodology; Innovation; Technology; Technological change; Management; Crowdsourcing 1. Introduction Global growth in volumes of goods and services- produced using a given amount of labour and capital- has over time fundamentally determined growth in human living standards (Fabina and Wright, 2013). For example, the world’s gross domestic product (GDP) has risen over 20-fold since 1850, globally transforming standards of living (Stewart, 2018). This rise in our standards of living has therefore been ascribed to technical progress, measured as total factor productivity- the contribution to growth of how effectively we combine given amounts of labour and capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media As a Contributing Stressor to Intimate Partner Violence and Femicide
    US-China Foreign Language, July 2017, Vol. 15, No. 7, 465-478 doi:10.17265/1539-8080/2017.07.007 D DAVID PUBLISHING Social Media as a Contributing Stressor to Intimate Partner Violence and Femicide Dr. Amanda Maitland EL Amri JNFLS International Centre, Jinan, Shandong Province, China This article focuses on a preliminary study which has examined ways in which social media may help cause stalker murder by individuals with personality disorders and a strong sense of sexual propriety. The study suggests that a public display on social media by the intended victim may trigger interpersonal violence. The study explores case studies of intimate partner murders using news media sources and documentaries. In all of the case studies, social media interaction and postings occurred shortly before murder. It is argued that the case studies demonstrate a preponderance of correlations between the social media postings, stalking behaviours, personality disorders, and the murder of an intimate partner. Moreover, the case studies provide a profile for Facebook/social media murder. The complex relationship between severe violence, stalking, borderline personality, and intimate partner violence is shown in this study. In addition to this, the struggle clients have in dealing with the: public, ambiguous, and unrelenting nature of social media postings has been explored. Finally, the sense of sexual propriety and entitlement found in the attitudes of the murderer and evident in all the case studies will be discussed. It is likely that therapists, psychologists, nurses, criminologists, and social workers will find this study of interest. Keywords: social media, borderline personality, murder, cyberstalking, intimate partner violence, sexual propriety, Facebook, Snapchat, Myspace Introduction Social media creates relational dissatisfaction and “mild” to “moderate” jealousy in individuals’ considered to have a normal state of mental health (Dainton, 2016; Papp, Danielewitz, & Cayemberb, 2012; Seidman, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Public Support for Science and Innovation
    Public Support for Science and Innovation A supplementary submission to the Productivity Commission from CSIRO responding to the draft report December 2006 Introduction and overview CSIRO believes that the draft report on public support for science and innovation makes a substantial contribution to discussions on the rationale for such support and on the benefits that flow to Australia from public investment in science. The findings of the report result from a rigorous analysis of available data using a variety of methods; acknowledge the considerable difficulties that can exist in trying to quantify even the economic returns that result from public sector support for science and innovation; and take a realistically broad view of the range of tangible and intangible benefits that such investment can produce. The report and the debate it generates should provide an opportunity to re-set the baselines for what publicly supported research does, and why. CSIRO in general supports the findings and conclusions of the report, which are fair, balanced and recognise the uncertainties that will always exist. While the findings that there ‘are strong rationales for the provision of public funding support for science and innovation’ and that ‘there are significant positive economic, social and environmental impacts from publicly supported science and innovation’ are not surprising, they are none the less welcome as the conclusions of an independent disinterested, technical study. Another important feature of the report is that it makes explicit the diversity of pathways through which science can have impact. This puts commercialisation into perspective as only one of many possible pathways to impact, noting that too great a focus on commercialisation can divert attention from some broader and even more important outcomes of research.
    [Show full text]
  • Radical Or Incremental: Where Does R&D Policy Hit ?
    Dis cus si on Paper No. 14-106 Radical or Incremental: Where Does R&D Policy Hit ? Mathias Beck, Cindy Lopes-Bento, and Andrea Schenker-Wickia Dis cus si on Paper No. 14-106 Radical or Incremental: Where Does R&D Policy Hit ? Mathias Beck, Cindy Lopes-Bento, and Andrea Schenker-Wickia Download this ZEW Discussion Paper from our ftp server: http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp14106.pdf Die Dis cus si on Pape rs die nen einer mög lichst schnel len Ver brei tung von neue ren For schungs arbei ten des ZEW. Die Bei trä ge lie gen in allei ni ger Ver ant wor tung der Auto ren und stel len nicht not wen di ger wei se die Mei nung des ZEW dar. Dis cus si on Papers are inten ded to make results of ZEW research prompt ly avai la ble to other eco no mists in order to encou ra ge dis cus si on and sug gesti ons for revi si ons. The aut hors are sole ly respon si ble for the con tents which do not neces sa ri ly repre sent the opi ni on of the ZEW. Radical or incremental: Where does R&D policy hit?* Mathias Beck a, Cindy Lopes-Bento a,b,c and Andrea Schenker-Wickia a) Univesity of Zurich b) K.U.Leuven, Dept. of Managerial Economics, Strategy and Innovation c) Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), Mannheim This version: September 2014 Abstract This study investigates the efficacy of public R&D support.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Regulation on Innovation
    Nesta Working Paper No. 12/02 The Impact of Regulation on Innovation Knut Blind The Impact of Regulation on Innovation Knut Blind Technische Universität Berlin, Chair of Innovation Economics Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Chair of Standardisation Nesta Working Paper 12/02 January 2012 www.nesta.org.uk/wp12‐02 Abstract This paper is part of the Compendium of Evidence on the Effectiveness of Innovation Policy Intervention. It examines the evidence on the influence of various types of regulation on innovation. Based on a conceptual approach distinguishing between the positive incentive functions of regulations and the negative compliance burden, the study covers economic, social and institutional regulations. Existing empirical analyses are surveyed, which are characterised by rather heterogeneous methodological approaches, data bases and results. In summary, the numerous empirical studies on the impact of different types of regulation on innovation present a rather heterogeneous picture both regarding the type of regulation, the sectors, the companies and the time horizon of the impacts. Finally, it has to be noted that most quantitative studies about the impact of regulations are not able to distinguish between the influence of changes in the legislation and of their enforcement and the related compliance of companies. Research gaps still exist in the development of appropriate indicators of the regulatory framework. Furthermore, the processes within companies to react to regulations deserve more attention to understand the rather heterogeneous impacts on innovations. Finally, regulations are per se not only exogenous to companies, but often there is close interaction between regulators and the regulated companies, which should further explain some of the existing ambivalence.
    [Show full text]
  • How Are Radical Innovations Developed? an Analytical Framework to Examine Radical Innovations Based on the Values of Cohesion Approach
    Paper to be presented at the DRUID 2012 on June 19 to June 21 at CBS, Copenhagen, Denmark, How are radical innovations developed? An analytical framework to examine radical innovations based on the Values of Cohesion approach. LUCIA HELENA H. T. VIEGAS Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos - FINEP The Brazilian Agency of Innovation [email protected] JOSÉ VITOR BOMTEMPO Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Escola de Química, Área de Gestão e Inovação Tecnológi [email protected] Abstract Our research proposes an analytical framework to examine radical innovations in the Kuhnian sense, based on the comprehension of the values of cohesion of a paradigm. We define radical innovation as the resultant of both a mode of production as a systemic conformation, and an institutional mode. Our research complements existing systemic studies on radical innovations, but under a different vision. Our approach takes into account the structural dimension that maintains a paradigm cohesive. The proposed framework is grounded on the structuralist approach, typical of studies of Human/Social Sciences (e.g., the works of Cl. Lévi-Strauss, F. de Saussure, W. Dilthey). This perspective enables the study of those factors that are manifested as a virtuality: as a belief, an ideological symbol, a cultural value, etc. Our framework was conceived to capture the virtualities, which express the conditions for the development of radical innovations. The proposed analytical framework based on values of cohesion - VCF is constituted of three analytical dimensions: the wheel of relationships, the force of cohesion, and the steps of transmission. The proposed VCF was validated to examine the potential for radical innovation in the change of raw materials sources for the Brazilian chemical industry, from fossils to renewables.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Therapists' Perceptions of Strategies for Overcoming Barriers to Treatment with Youth and Their Families
    Pepperdine University Pepperdine Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations 2015 Examining therapists' perceptions of strategies for overcoming barriers to treatment with youth and their families Lyndsay Brooks Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/etd Recommended Citation Brooks, Lyndsay, "Examining therapists' perceptions of strategies for overcoming barriers to treatment with youth and their families" (2015). Theses and Dissertations. 643. https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/etd/643 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Pepperdine University Graduate School of Education and Psychology EXAMINING THERAPISTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF STRATEGIES FOR OVERCOMING BARRIERS TO TREATMENT WITH YOUTH AND THEIR FAMILIES A clinical dissertation presented in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Psychology by Lyndsay Brooks October, 2015 Judy Ho, Ph.D., ABPP – Dissertation Chairperson This clinical dissertation, written by Lyndsay Brooks, M.A. under the guidance of a Faculty Committee and approved by its members, has been submitted to and accepted by the Graduate Faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirement of the degree of DOCTOR OF PSYCHOLOGY Doctoral Committee: Judy Ho, Ph.D., ABPP
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Innovation: a Review and Synthesis
    Received: 14 December 2017 Revised: 28 January 2018 Accepted: 29 January 2018 DOI: 10.1111/isj.12193 RESEARCH ARTICLE Digital innovation: A review and synthesis Rajiv Kohli1 | Nigel P. Melville2 1 Raymond A. Mason School of Business, College of William & Mary, PO Box 8795, Abstract Williamsburg, VA, USA Organizations are under increasing pressure to apply digital technol- 2 Stephen M. Ross School of Business, ogies to renew and transform their business models. A great deal of University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA research has examined specific phenomena, such as adoption ante- Correspondence cedents and design methods. However, it is unclear what we know Rajiv Kohli, Raymond A. Mason School of in totality, including what research streams exist, how they fit Business, College of William & Mary, PO Box 8795, Williamsburg, VA, USA. together, and fruitful opportunities for new knowledge develop- Email: [email protected] ment. We combine scientometric and systematic literature review methodologies to examine 7 dimensions of an adapted theoretical framework: initiation; development; implementation; exploitation; the role of the external competitive environment; role of internal organizational environment; and product, service, and process out- comes. From a macro perspective, we find vastly uneven coverage of research streams, diversity and diffusiveness of research, and knowledge and learning as an underlying conceptual pillar. Com- bined with our summary of each of the 7 research streams, these findings suggest several areas of future research, which we develop by identifying oppositions and tensions. KEYWORDS agency, digital, innovation, scientometrics 1 | INTRODUCTION Organizations are under increasing pressure to apply digital technologies to renew and transform their business models.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ledger and Times, June 10, 1967
    Murray State's Digital Commons The Ledger & Times Newspapers 6-10-1967 The Ledger and Times, June 10, 1967 The Ledger and Times Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.murraystate.edu/tlt Recommended Citation The Ledger and Times, "The Ledger and Times, June 10, 1967" (1967). The Ledger & Times. 5688. https://digitalcommons.murraystate.edu/tlt/5688 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Newspapers at Murray State's Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Ledger & Times by an authorized administrator of Murray State's Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. - "Us • , E 9, 1967 41/) 1111811144 SI I SW IS lionittray oommtunly RSINIPPIN The Only, Largest Afternoon Daily Circulation In Murray And Beth In City Calloway County, • And In County, elmommummosun,iii United Press International In Our 88th Year Murray, Ky., Saturday Afternoon, June 10, 1967 10* Per Copy Vol. LXXXVIII No. 137 Seen & Heard Dr. Harston Atomic Energy • • Speaker For Contract Goes Israel Drives To Gates MURRAY Rotary Club To MSU Here Of The Atomic Enegery Commission Damascus; Soviets Or. Marlow Harston, Tiegional One of the best quotes we have read has awarded a $39.000 research Director of Region 1, a nine county lately is Some of the contract to the physics depart- people who area for work in mental hegath and suffer because they are ment at Murray State University, maunder mental retardation, was tile speak- stood would suffer a gaud acso" rding to Dr. Lynn Brative.l. 4 er Thursday for the Murray Rotary if they were understood'.
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining Successful Radical Innovations with Effectuation
    XXVIe Conférence Internationale de Management Stratégique Explaining Successful Radical Innovations with Effectuation Buisson, Bernard IMT Dubai [email protected] Daidj, Nabyla Télécom Ecole de Management (Institut Mines Télécom) [email protected] Résumé : Nous suggérons que les innovations disruptives sont une catégorie particulière des innovations qui rencontrent un important succès commercial. La théorie de la disruption s'applique à des situations très particulières. Les entreprises qui construiraient l'intégralité de leur politique d'innovation autour de la théorie de la disruption prendraient un risque considérable. Il serait préférable qu'elles s'attachent à comprendre de quoi est faite une innovation qui connait un succès commercial important, et comment il est possible d'y arriver. Les innovations qui débouchent sur un succès commercial important résultent d'une combinaison de plusieurs changements majeurs, qui ne sont pas mis en œuvre simultanément. Les entreprises, qu'il s'agisse de start-ups ou d'acteurs établis, doivent progresser selon une logique d'essai-erreur caractéristique d'une logique effectuale, jusqu'à ce qu'elles atteignent, parfois après plusieurs années, la combinaison idéale. Mots-clés : Disruption, innovation radicale, acteur établi, anomalie 1 Lyon, 7-9 juin 2017 XXVIe Conférence Internationale de Management Stratégique Explaining Successful Radical Innovations with Effectuation INTRODUCTION The management of innovation is one of the most demanding challenges today (Dodgson, Gann, and Salter 2008). The external environment characterized by globalization, convergence, competitive/market uncertainty, time-to-market pressure, shortening product lifecycles is also based on knowledge, information, fast-changing technology and innovative economy. In the recent few years a series of innovations and trends have changed the way people perceive technology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Vision in Radical Technological Innovation A
    THE VALUE OF VISION IN RADICAL TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Tammy L. Carleton September 2010 © 2011 by Tammy Lee Carleton. All Rights Reserved. Re-distributed by Stanford University under license with the author. This dissertation is online at: http://purl.stanford.edu/mk388mb2729 ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Larry Leifer, Primary Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Riitta Katila I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Chuck House Approved for the Stanford University Committee on Graduate Studies. Patricia J. Gumport, Vice Provost Graduate Education This signature page was generated electronically upon submission of this dissertation in electronic format. An original signed hard copy of the signature page is on file in University Archives. iii THE VALUE OF VISION IN RADICAL TECHNOLOGICAL INVENTION ABSTRACT Is a technological vision needed to drive radical or disruptive innovations? Few studies have discussed a possible relationship between the formation of a technological vision and the sustained creation of radical innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • RADICAL INNOVATION a Blueprint for a New UK Research and Technology Funding Agency
    RADICAL INNOVATION A blueprint for a new UK research and technology funding agency The UK government has proposed the development of a new research and technology funding agency.1,2,3 This agency is described as a new approach to funding high-risk, high-payoff emerging fields of research and technology, broadly modelled on the US Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA). For over 60 years, ARPA programmes have applied a specific funding model for technology development, credited with producing transformational technology. Examples include the precursors to the internet and GPS. This briefing sets out a blueprint for an agency that supports radical innovation. This is how the engineering community believe an ARPA-inspired agency could bring most value to the UK. 1 Queen’s Speech 2019: background briefing notes, 14/10/2019 2 Conservative Party Manifesto 2019 3 Queen’s Speech 2019: background briefing notes, 19/12/2019 Radical innovation – A blueprint for a new UK research and technology funding agency 2 Engineering is crucial for radical innovation. It often forms a two-way A BRIEF HISTORY OF ARPA connection between research and innovation to enable commercial The Advanced Research Projects breakthroughs. A new funding mechanism could address the UK’s historic Agency (ARPA) was created in 1958 under-investment in innovation and unlock positive disruption and step by the US President in response to the changes in technology that reverberate far across society. The benefits can launch of Sputnik by the Soviet Union.4 be far-reaching. By strengthening local economies, creating sustainable The purpose of ARPA was to form and jobs and addressing global challenges, opportunities can be driven in every execute research and development part of the UK and improve people’s lives.
    [Show full text]