FEATURES

Mark Harris on avant-garde style in .recent British art and advertising

As a discourse exploited to the point of incoherence the theory of Mark Wallinger Royal Ascot the avant garde refuses to dissipate. Its currency as a marketing 1994 device still evident, the notion of avant-garde practice rattles around critical writing on the new British art, still assuming a collision of political and aesthetic radicality, even sustaining an anachronistic belief in shock and offensiveness, not just as feasible achievements (in a society that instantly embraces such qualities) but even as strategies potent enough to influence social change. That the avant garde cannot, even early this century, revolutionary approach to literary theory. Even be simplistically applied as a categorisation was where an avant garde is cautiously identified as hav­ shown by the Russian formalist Victor Shklovsky who ing made an effective challenge through art, as with from 1917 fought for the Bolsheviks as he wrote Theory Peter Burger's account of Dadaist performance, its of Prose which while not recognising a sublimation radicality is interpreted as the (failed) attempt, of art into political life nevertheless advocated a through unmitigated iconoclasm, to dissolve the

2.96 I ART MONTHLY I 193 3 Sam Taylor-Wood Brontosaurus 1995 (video still)

institution of art into life 1 It is a diluted and simpli­ important'. Frieze (November- December 1995). fied version of this theory that resurfaces in current Neville Wakefield: ' [British artists ] have adopted an enthusiasm for British art invo lving apparent collu­ aggressive guerrilla approach to both art-making and sion by so me of the artists themselves . Dinos and its display, and their 'fuck it', do- it-yourself attitude Jake Chapman, Damien Hirst, Sarah Lucas, Chris gives much of their art its bite.' (catalogue for Bril­ Ofili and others depend on a persistent tolerance of liant!). Robe rta Smith: 'the British contingent this trope for their work to gain meaning. As an embraces with particular enthusiasm the belief that atavistic avant-gardism it can be understood as a art ... has a respo nsibili ty to be dist urb ing and stylistic device , a vestigial offensiveness that desig­ adversarial ... ', (New York Times, 23/11/95) nates participation in a broader submission to abra­ This photograph, supplied by Mat Co lli shaw, is sive imagery and language , especially in current falsely used by the Walker to radicalise the exhibition. advertising where, in order to promote commodities, That such an established institution fee ls comfortable these devices are developed most effectively.2 playing at avant-gardism, at the expense of a more It is no irony then that one of the most revealing complex appraisal of these artists, is a sign of how examples of this phenomenon is an advertisement degraded the term has become. The very institutions for Brilliant! at the Walker Art Center, Minneapolis, to be challenged or at least 'reframed' (to use Hal where an aerial photo of the aftermath of a 1992 IRA Foster's term of what remains for an avant-garde bomb in London has the names of the exhibiting ro le3), are instead allowed to perpetuate such tropes artists, randomly superimposed as if claiming for in this mythologising of contemporary art. Little dif­ their own, in the sense even as collaborators, the ferent in its oversimplification of affect is the docu­ infrastructure's devastation. Beyond the obvious mentation accompanying the Tate's Turner Pri ze. 4 resonance this image would have for Americans still Without scrutinising the history that legitimates these pondering the bombing in Otlahoma City, it reveals claims, both exaggerate the ass umption by some of an institutionalised aestheticisation of violence, as if these artists that new form, or in some instances sim­ such explosions could be interpreted not simply as ply new attitude, engenders rad ical content. the enviro nment we now have to put up with , but An alternative to avant-garde theory that nonethe­ rather as avant-garde interventions on a scale less retains the sense of resistance may be Mikhail desired by, but eluding, these artists. If this associa­ Bakhtin's evaluation of the carnivaL His identification tion seems far-fetch ed it's worth weighing some of of an irrepressible opposition to hierarchical institu­ the language used to describe the work in that par­ tions originating in medieval celebration, in laughter, ticular exhibition. Richard Flood: ' ... that unholy ribaldry, blasphemy and travesty, is easily enough interest [from the British press and public] allows traced in this country through its literature , music the artists to operate with a very well-defined pro­ hall, television, and comedy to some of these artists. gramme of subversion. They can actually make work Bakhtin's claim that the anti-authoritarianism implic­ that, within the culture, is quite anarchic and that's it in carnival excess had a disrupting centrifugal

4 193 I ART MONTHLY I 2 .96 effect on institutional discourse has parallels with the 'unauthorised' vo ice resists authority on several Ben Nott and some of the work here. In terms of Bakhtin's cate­ levels, granting a momentary outlet for the speech­ PauiBennell gories the abusive language of the market place is le ss (while indicating how speech is relentlessly Advertisement for Kadu evoked by Sarah Lucas's invective, street cries by oppressed institutionally) and opposing designations Sportswear 1993 Michael Landy and by Gillian Wearing's placards, the of how art should be made. celebration of bodily degradation by Damien Hirst's We are frequently reminded that this art, this installations, laughter at the community's institutions avant garde, is 'British', though since most of the and leaders by Mark Wallinger's videos, while the work under scrutiny is London-based this means less sideshow aspect to much of the work, in terms of geographically than culturally. Such an intense cul­ theme and installation, places emphasis on provoca­ tural relativism has obvious marketing value, and yet tive entertainment rather than on setting out condi­ the declared characteristics - offensiveness, irony, tions for contemplation or praxis. humour, paradox, sexual frankness - identified as With reference to Bakhtin's 'heteroglossia', where British, are hardly unique to this country. Maurizio innumerable competing discourses jostle for efficacy Cattelan, Karen Finley, Martin Kippenberger, Jeff to form the language used by any society, it is possi­ Koons, Annie Sprinkle and The Wooster Group use ble to assess the effectiveness of this art by compar­ similar devices. As ide from the retrogressive chau­ ing the extent to which it counters dominant vinism of this phenomenon (how long do you have to centripetal forms of speech in which we all partici­ be living here to qualify and do you count if you live pate by default. Seen from this point of view Sam abroad?) what might be most British about the traits Taylor-Wood's Brontosaurus sets the naked male it identifies is the one it reveals about itself. By com­ dancer against a Samuel Barber so undtrack as mending national idiosyncrasy it rewards the same apparent incompatibles, overlaid as a representation provincialism that insulated other generations of of emotional limit - the carnival dance resisting British artists from exposu re to innovative work from within - while appearing at times to take its from abroad. cue from the authoritative determination of the clas­ As the borders of the nation have grown perme­ sical music. Characterising some of the most effec­ able there appears an increasing need for this cul­ tive work, especially where there is an intentional ture to recognise value in an anachronistic category excess of content as with Gillian Wearing's 'docu­ - Britishness - and the artists themselves offer no mentaries', the 'I' of the artist as author changes to lucid critique of this use to which they are being put. an 'I' located in the enunciations of other people, The implication that this celebrated nationalism people usually from outside the artworld. This use of might be a retreat from a trans-national style, into

2.96 I ART MONTHLY I 193 5 FEATURES

Can it be that the same institutions defining this across America, a period of mourning her mother's death). Confining meaning to the utterable or legible avant-gardism are overlooking examples of a more has the virtue of it needing no translation as it crosses profound collision of aesthetic and political mediating structure s, from artwork , to gallery, to newspaper, to television , to collector, to museum. Its radicality or has that possibility just been iro ned significance, fi xed at the start as essence , remains fi at by 16 years of conservative rul e? intact along the journey, reiterated by each agency promoting and in turn deriving purpose from the work. There is no room for difference, for dispu te, what is locally potent, is hardly tenable given this because there is nothing other than what was stated participation in the conventio ns of avant-gardism, as the authentic subject at the beginning. The now clearly the orthodoxy of art institutions. Along authenticity of the artist's body probed by cameras is with certain other characteristics this aspect reveals declarative at outset and cannot easily be diluted or a focus common to much international contempo­ challenged in its subsequent passage into co mmen­ rary art suggesting a continuing impo ssibility for tary. What it says ab out itself it is. As its own commod­ regionalism and the subsequent irrelevance of this ity the art sells itself with the clarity of advertising, acclamation of Britishness. and as noted earlier, shares some of the provocational One of these characteristics is the conceptual methods sanctioned by the trade. Th e irony of John emphasis shared with much recent American wo rk. Frankland's sham corporate elevator lobby, You Can 't With the British artists considered here it is often Touch This, as installed in the Saatchi Gallery is that, accompanied by an ess~nt ialit y of form, often because its meaning is so transparent at the outset, it described as minimalist, though lacking that earlier fails abysmally to resist what it critiques by becoming, rigour where material was concept and its ontological rather than negating, its own negation. basis, and was used with necessary sensitivity, as with By way of a co nclusion it might be worth consid­ Richard Serra, Carl Andre and Walter de Maria. Here ering what possibilities of political radicalism are by contrast the material has little presence though concealed or found intolerable by the acclaim shown much bulk and is only notationally used as a sign of this now familiar group of artists making wo rk that rigour, as minimalist style that serves to present, while 'thumbs its nose at authority'. 5 Other than glancingly, keeping out of the way of, a conceptual directness. the fo llowing issues, randomly chosen but critical to There is an argument that this art fill s minimal the period marking the emergence of th ese artists, form with content, as in the case of Damien Hirst or are just not in evidence. Aids. Racism. Gay and Les­ Mo na Hatoum, implying incorrectly that its earlier bi an ac tivism. Th e consequences of the Gulf War. incarnation had little content of its own. Such work The intentional cre ation at government level of a fails though when it assumes its ontology has little to new ec on omic underclass . Economic colonialism. do with materials and all to do with concept. The The evisceration of organised labour. The eviscera­ unintended torpor of Hirst's and Hatoum 's Turner tion of the welfare state. prize installations was due to their subj ects screaming From artists regarding themselves as 'Thatcher's for attention from within structures that warranted children'6 and described as transforming 'boredom none. In other work there is a too ready settling for into the impetus for action and provocation'7 you'd the superficial referent in the way reductive means is expect to see occasional instances of de ep engage­ used to fo cus attention on the legibility of subj ect, in ment. Can it be that the same institutions defining the sense of something literally re ad from the work . this avant-gardi sm are overlooking examples of a This veers towards unintended obviousness, as with more profound co llision of aesthetic and political Mat Collishaw's recent installations showing views of radicality or has that possibility just been ironed fiat homeless people through Christmas souvenirs (a valid by 16 years of conservative rule? I ove rlaying of a Victorian ethos onto a contemporary plight but which unfortu nately is here imbued with a 1. 1'lleory of the Avant-Garde, Peter Burger, University of Minnesota Press, 1984 . distracting nostalgia), Kerry Stewart's ingratiating fig­ 2. Some examples of recent adve rtising, appr·opriate in this context, arc the ures and Hermione Wiltshire's Seamen II and Casano­ co ntrovers ial ci nema slots by Adam Scholes and Joe Pub li c, made for Joh n va with their dead-ending iconography. The signifying Warr's Hartey·Davidson dealersh ip (inde pend ently pro duce d, bu t sup ­ pressed by Ha1·tey-Davidson themselves); the banned London Tran sport brick delivered svviftly to the forehead rather than the poster by Alan Page of 13 Ten 51; TBWA:s Won derbra posters fo r Pl aytex; multiple allusions of a signifying chain. and work by Ben Nott. At its most effective this surfaceness permits 3. What's Neo about the NeoAvant-GaTde?, Hal Foster, October, Fall 1994. 4. On Mon a Hatou m'sLight Sentence: 'The entrancing pattern of the shadows oblique and unexpected penetration into a density of co-exists with a sense of the dehumani sation imposed on individuals by cultural references as with Mark Wallinge r's Royal tech nology, uti li ta ri ani sm and bureaucracy'; and on Dam ien Hirst's work : Ascot. At its worst it leads to obfuscation and irrele­ 'For Hirst, the cigarette is a mul ti·l ayerc d symbol suggesting beauty, luxury, danger and death.' Th e J'u?'ner Prize 1995, Virginia Button, Tate Gallery. vant ascription of meaning - as vvith Hirst where it 5. Stua rt Morgan, Brilliant! remains to be proved what his work reveals of death 6. Anya Gallaccio, Ibid. other than its idle referencing, especially if compared 7. Neville Wakefie ld, Ib id. with any number of other representations (most notable recently wo uld be Tina Keane's 1995 video Mark Harris is an artist living in London and Transpositions , shown at Plummet, of her journey New York.

6 193 I ART MONTHLY I 2 .96 Contents February 1996 Issue No 193

{ 19} ARTNOTES { 37} Siobhan Hapaska Art Monthly { 21 } Obituary Juan Cruz Suite 17 26 Charing Cross Ro ad Felix Gonzalez-Torres { 38} An ish Kapoor London WC2H OD G Dalia Manor United Kingdom { 22 } PROFILE { 39 } Mark Pimlott Playing Dumb Mark Gisbourne Telephone & Fax David Barrett on 0171 240 0389

Ceal Floye r { 41 } OPINION ISSN 0142 6702 Making a Spectacle Art Monthly is pub lished { 24} EXHIBITIONS . Peter Kardia 10 times a year Reviews Annual Mat Collishaw { 42} EDITIONS subscription rates {01} COVER Ian Hunt Artists' Books lari Pittman { 25} Jane and louise Round Up INDMDUAL Like Yo u 1995 (detail ) Wilson Cathy Courtney UK£2 7. 50 Gilda Williams { 43} Books Rest of Europe £36 Rest of World £48 { 03} FEATURES { 26} Matthew Dalziel The Usual Suspects N America US$50 Putting on the Style and louise Scullion John A Walker Mark Harris on Padraig Timoney INSTITUTIO NS avant-garde style in . { 27} 3e biennale de lyon { 46} SALEROOMS UK £34 Rest of Europe £44 recent British art Marta Dalla Bern ardina london's Winter Sales Rest of Wo rld £58 and advertising { 29 } Moby Dick Colin Gleadell N America US$59 { 08} LA Story Mark Sladen Art may not be the { 30} Now Wash Your Hands {48} LISTINGS Editor biggest game in town but John Tozer Exhibitions Patricia Bickers Contributing Editor it is the most exciting { 31 } Obsession Jeffrey Kastner, USA argues David A Greene Andrew Cross Managing Editor { 12} Reconsidering { 32} David Griffiths I Anna Letty Mooring Conceptual Art and Bernhard Blume Advertising Matt Hale Michael Archer on I The Impossible Distribution Conceptual art Science of Being Nell Wendler then and now Philip Sanderson Editorial Assistant { 34} Distant Relations Jessica Wyman { 18} COMMENT Piers Masterson Publishers Jack & Ne ll Wend ler Editorial { 35} Inside Out Design letters Eddie Chamb ers Area

Pub li shed by Britannia Art Pu blications Ltd. Printed in Great Britain by Drydens Printers Limited, 172-174 Brent Crescent, London NW10 7XU. Distribution: UK: Central Books Ltd, 99 Wallis Rd, London E9 5LN , 0181 986 4854; Comag, Mercury Centre, Central Way, Feltham, Middx TW14 ORX, 0181 844 1000; USA: Ubiquity Distributors, 607 Degraw Street, Brooklyn, NY 112 17 USA, 718 875 5491. Second class postage paid at Middlesex, NJ Postma ster: send changes of address to Art Monthly c/ o C&C Mailers International Inc, 900 Lincoln Blvd, PO Box 177, Middlesex, NJ 08846 USA.

The views expressed in Art Monthly are not necessarily those of the Publishers or Editors. Articles submitted for possible publication and accompanied by SAE are welcomed, but it is advisable to contact the Editorial Department beforehand. While every effort will be made to safeguard unsolicited mss, photos and other material submitted, the Editors will not accept responsibility for loss or damage. The electronic version of Art Monthly is available on the Art Index. © No part of this publication may be reprinted without permission. ENGLAND