Co-Ops 101: Cooperative Housing Ownership in Washington, DC

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Co-Ops 101: Cooperative Housing Ownership in Washington, DC Co-ops C101ooperative Housing Ownership in Washington, DC ACKNOWLEDGMENTS fff Much of the information in this document has been drawn from a pub- lication entitled Co-operatively Speaking, prepared and distributed by the Edmund J. Flynn Company, Washington, D.C., co-op specialists since 1920. That publication is an excellent resource for additional, de- tailed information and may be obtained from them at edmundjflynn.com. This document was prepared by members of the DC Cooperative Housing Coalition Board of Directors: Arthur Leabman (1870 Wyoming Avenue, NW, Inc.) — committee chair, Stephen McKevitt (The Beverly Court Coopera- tive, Inc.), Paul St. Hilaire (Tiber Island Cooperative Homes, Inc.), and Sue Stephens (The Porter, Inc.). Other members of the Coalition Board of Di- rectors were Fred Dyda (Tilden Gardens, Inc.), Carl Gerber (The Cathedral Avenue Cooperative, Inc.) — President of the Coalition, Jill Golden (3028 Porter Street, NW, Inc. ), Mike O’Dell (Harbour Square Owners, Inc.), Ray Olson (River Park Mutual Homes, Inc.), Russ Rader (Westmoreland Coop- erative), Nancy Skinkle (Broadmoor Cooperative Apartments, Inc.), and JoAnn Wells (Potomac Plaza Apartments Cooperative, Inc.). Photographs of just a few of Washington’s many cooperatives are included in this document. They are indicative, however, of a wide range in size, struc- ture, location, and architectural style. ON THE COVER The Ontario f 2853 Ontario Road, NW f 120 units Watergate East part of the Watergate complex f 2500 Virginia Avenue, NW f 231 units 3020 Tilden Street, NW f 20 units Ponce de Leon f 4514 Connecticut Avenue, NW f 52 units Harbour Square f 500 N Street, SW f 447 units 3024 Porter, 1925 Cooperative housing ownership in Washington, D.C. In 1920, several rental apartment buildings in Washington, D.C., converted to cooperative ownership. Since then, many others either have converted to cooperative ownership or were built and formed as cooperatives at the start. Washington is second only to New York City in the concentration of this type of home ownership. Cooperatives are located throughout the city and include many buildings of historical and architectural significance. They range in size from some as small as four units to others numbering in the hundreds. They also vary in the type of structures and number of buildings which they may include. 1 Some cooperatives are contained within a single, multiple-unit building; others include any number of buildings. More- over, cooperatives may include a variety of structures, e.g., high-rise apartment buildings, garden-style apartments, town houses, and detached houses. Despite their popularity and long his- tory in Washington, cooperatives are not always well understood as a form of residential home ownership; nor is there always a clear understanding of how they differ from condominiums. This document has been prepared to provide a brief overview of cooperatives and should be of interest to several dif- ferent audiences: f Persons considering the purchase of a cooperative unit f Real estate agents involved in the sale The Presidential 1026 16th Street, NW and purchase of cooperative units 44 units f Owners of cooperative units f Cooperative Boards of Directors f Persons involved in the operation and management of cooperatives f Loan officers involved in financing cooperative units 2 f DC Co-ops 101 The overview is intended to address several fundamental questions: f How does ownership in a cooperative differ from condominium ownership? f How do cooperatives operate? f What is included in a cooperative’s monthly fees and assessments? f What is involved in purchasing a cooperative unit? f What kind of financing is available? f What is the role of the cooperative’s Board of Directors? f What is involved in settlement and transfer of cooperative ownership? f What are some specific benefits of owning and living in a cooperative unit? f What are some common misconceptions about cooperatives? Potomac Plaza Apartments 2475 Virginia Avenue, NW 274 units 3 How cooperative ownership differs from condominium ownership A housing cooperative is a form of ownership in which a person purchases shares of stock, or some other form of membership, in a corporation that was specifically formed for the purpose of providing its members a place to live. How is this form of ownership different from condominium ownership? A basic difference is that while ownership of a con- dominium unit constitutes direct ownership of real property, ownership in a cooperative constitutes a share of ownership in a corporation. It is the corporation that has ownership (fee simple title) of the entire property (building/s and land). The ownership interest of the members in their own residence is an ownership in personal property. The specific instrument of ownership varies among different cooperatives. Some cooperatives issue shares of stock and a proprietary lease. Others do not issue stock but instead offer some form of ownership contract. In either case, the purchaser becomes a member of the cooperative and, as such, gains ex- clusive occupancy rights to a particular unit, as well as the use and enjoyment of the cooperative’s common elements. Condominium ownership, in contrast, combines real property (fee simple) ownership of an individual condominium unit with an undivided interest, as “tenants in common,” in all the common areas and facilities of the association (e.g., land, hall- ways, basement areas, pools, roof decks, etc.). Each unit own- er’s interest in the common areas and elements is undivided and indistinguishable from any other unit owner’s interest. 4 f DC Co-ops 101 OWNERSHIP Cooperative Condominium The corporation owns the entire Each unit is separately titled cooperative property. and owned by the individual owner(s). Members own a proportionate Common areas and facilities are share in the corporation and thus owned collectively by unit owners have occupancy rights to as tenants in common, with each a particular unit. unit owner having an undivided interest. Another major difference between cooperatives and condominiums is how real estate taxes are assessed and paid. For cooperatives, taxes are as- sessed on the entire cooperative as a whole, not on individual units. The tax is paid by the corporation but the proportionate share for each unit is passed on to the individual unit owner as part of the monthly fees. For con- dominiums, the local government assesses and bills each unit individually, and unit owners pay the assessed tax directly to the government. REAL ESTATE TAXES Cooperative Condominium The real estate tax on the The real estate tax on each entire cooperative is paid by the individual condominium unit corporation. Members pay their and its undivided interest in proportionate share as part of the common elements is paid the cooperative’s monthly directly by each unit owner to the assessment fees. taxing agency. It is not included as part of the condominium association’s monthly fees. 5 Governing documents A cooperative is governed by its Certificate or Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, and House Rules. As provided in the Bylaws, there is an annual meeting at which the membership elects members to serve on the Board of Directors. The an- nual meeting also provides an opportunity for members to dis- cuss and, when required, to vote upon various financial and other matters. In addition, cooperatives may sometimes hold special meetings called either by the Board of Directors or by the membership at large to address specific concerns that may arise. Unlike cooperatives, condominium associations are not incor- porated but are created by a declaration. Like cooperatives, however, they are also governed by a set of Bylaws as well as various rules and regulations established by the condomin- ium association. GOVERNING DOCUMENTS Cooperative Condominium Articles of Incorporation Declaration Bylaws Bylaws House Rules Rules and Regulations Proprietary/Ownership Property Deed for documents individual unit 6 f DC Co-ops 101 How cooperatives operate Despite differences in the form of ownership and how real estate taxes are assessed and paid, the day-to-day operation of cooperatives and condo- minium associations are similar in many ways. The cooperative’s Board of Directors is charged with directing the op- eration and business affairs of the cooperative. For instance, the Board adopts an annual budget to meet the estimated expenses for the coming year, including the real estate taxes which are assessed on the entire coop- erative. The Board also has the authority to establish, amend, and enforce the cooperative’s House Rules that, together with the Bylaws and the Pro- prietary Lease or other Ownership Documents, govern a member’s use and occupancy of the property. Although some cooperatives may be entirely self-managed, many, if not most, contract with a property management firm or in-house professional manager to handle such matters as maintenance and repair of the com- mon property, hiring and supervision of staff (e.g., desk staff and custodial staff), collecting monthly assessments or other fees due to the coopera- tive, paying bills, etc. In addition to participating and voting in annual and special meetings, electing persons to the Board of Directors, and serving on the Board (if elected), members of the cooperative can participate in its opera- tion of the cooperative in other ways, such as serving on standing or ad hoc committees. 7 Fees & assessments Monthly assessment fees for each cooperative unit are calcu- lated to cover that unit’s proportionate share of the coopera- tive’s expenses, as based on the number of shares of stock or the percentage of ownership otherwise associated with that unit. These shares or percentages are set at the time the co- operative is established and remain fixed. Included in monthly fees are costs for operating and maintaining the cooperative, management company fees, the cooperative association’s in- surance, underlying mortgage (if any), contributions to re- serves, and real estate taxes.
Recommended publications
  • Cooperative Housing in the United States
    HOUSING COOPERATIVES UNITED STATES 1949-1950 Joint publication of Division of Housing Research Housing HOUSING AND HOME FINANCE AGENCY Research Bureau of Labor Statistics UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR WASHINGTON 1951 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Cooperative Housing in the United States 1949 and 1950 Housing Research Paper No. 24 Bulletin No. 1093 HOUSING AND HOME FINANCE AGENCY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of the Administrator Bureau of Labor Statistics Housing Research Division For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U . S. Government Printing: Office, Washington 25, D. C. Price 65 cents (paper) Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis P r e f a c e After the end of World W ar II the severe housing shortage in this country led to an increased interest in cooperative housing as one means of solving the problem. This gave further impetus to a movement which began in the United States about a third of a century ago among people who held that by joining together in the purchase of land and the construction of houses they could obtain dwellings of good quality at less cost than those being provided in other ways. As things have worked out, some housing cooperatives have been outstandingly successful and have accomplished everything their sponsors hoped for. Others, however, have proved to be disap­ pointing, either falling by the wayside or failing to attain the original objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperatives in Industrial and Service Sectors in the Asia-Pacific Region
    Cooperatives in industrial and service sectors in the Asia-Pacific region Models, work and employment, ecosystem and public policies International Cooperative Alliance Asia and Pacific & 9, Aradhana Enclave +91-11-26888067 ica-asia and pacific Sector-13, R. K. Puram International Organisation of the Industrial and Service Cooperatives New Delhi-110066 +91-11-26888250 icaapac [email protected] icaasiapacific ica-ap.coop Cooperatives in industrial and service sectors in the Asia-Pacific region Table of contents List of tables iv List of figures ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ iv Abbreviations and acronyms ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� v Synthesis note 1 Introduction���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������1 2 The scope of target types of the present study ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 3 Method����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 2 ‘Type’ and ‘model’�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Evolution of Management Accounting
    1990's: Value Based Management Focus shifted to include the creation of customer value, strategy, balanced scorecards, EVA, and other related concepts. 1980's: Lcan Enterprise CA M-I Cost Management Focus shifted to the reduction of waste, JTT, teamwork, ABC, target costing, quality, investment & product life cycle management. 1951 - 1980's: Managerial Accounting Focus shifted to providinginformation for management planning & control. 1920 - 1950: Cost Accounting Matching concept developed. Focus on cost determination and financial control. 1812 - 1920: Accountingfor Processes Prior to the matching concept. Focus on operating cost and efficiency of processes. Shah Kamal Historical Evolution of Assistant Relationship Manager Management Accounting Bank Alfalah [email protected] Abstract The obsolescence of most companies' cost accounting and management control systems is particularly unfortunate for the global competition of the 1980s (Johnson & Kaplan, 1987). During the past two decades, conventional cost and management accounting practices have been under extensive criticism for their malfunction to instigate change and their inability to support management accounting innovations in coping with the requirements of a changing environment. The academic literature has been crucial of conventional management accounting systems particularly for their lack of efficiency and capability to present comprehensive and the latest information and to assure decision makers and potential users of such information. Focusing on this debate, current study reviews the evolution of cost and management accounting innovations over the past century around the world and to examine whether there has been a significant impact of management accounting in the organization. The analyses suggest that management accounting is changing. However, these changes do not have much bearing upon the type of management accounting techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade Management Guidelines
    Trade Management Guidelines TRADE MANAGEMENT TASK FORCE Theodore R. Aronson, CFA, Chairman Aronson + Partners Gregory H. Bokach, CFA Damian Maroun American Century Investment Management G.E. Asset Management Corporation Eugene K. Bolton Jean Margo Reid G.E. Asset Management Corporation Paul Richards* Michael H. Buek, CFA Financial Services Authority The Vanguard Group H. Paul Reynolds Richard A. Carriuolo Frank Russell Securities, Inc. R.M. Davis, Inc. George U. Sauter Gene A. Gohlke, Ph.D., CPA* The Vanguard Group U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Erik R. Sirri Paul S. Gottlieb Babson College Merrill Lynch Wayne H. Wagner Joanne M. Hill Plexus Group Goldman, Sachs & Co. Jessica L. Mann, CFA Donald B. Keim CFA Institute The Wharton School Maria J. A. Clark, CFA Anthony J. Leitner CFA Institute Goldman, Sachs & Co. Ananth Madhavan ITG, Inc. * Observer. 1 CFA INSTITUTE TRADE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES Recognizing the ambiguities and complexities surrounding the concept of Best Execution,1 CFA Institute Trade Management Task Force has developed the CFA Institute Trade Management Guidelines (Guidelines) for investment management firms (Firms). The recommendations contained herein stem from the obligations Firms have to clients regarding the execution of their trades and provide Firms with a demonstrable framework from which to make consistently good trade-execution decisions over time. The Guidelines formalize processes, disclosures, and record-keeping suggestions that, together, form a systematic, repeatable, and demonstrable approach to seeking Best Execution. It is important to note that the Guidelines are a compilation of recommended practices and not standards. CFA Institute encourages Firms worldwide to adopt as many of the recommendations as are appropriate to their particular circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Customer Relationship Management, Customer Satisfaction and Its Impact on Customer Loyalty
    Customer Relationship Management, Customer Satisfaction and Its Impact on Customer Loyalty Sulaiman, Said Musnadi Faculty of Economic and Business, University of Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia Keywords: Customer Relationship Management, Satisfaction, Customer Loyalty. Abstract: This study aims to determine the effect of Customer Relationship Management (CRM) on Customer Satisfaction and its impact on Customer Loyalty of Islamic Bank in Aceh’s Province. The study population is all customers in in the Islamic Bank. This study uses convinience random sampling with a sample size of 250 respondents. The analytical method used is structural equation modeling (SEM). The results showed that the Customer Relationship Management significantly influences both on satisfaction and its customer loyalty. Furthermore, satisfaction also affects its customer loyalty. Customer satisfaction plays a role as partially mediator between the influences of Customer Relationship Management on its Customer Loyalty. The implications of this research, the management of Islamic Bank needs to improve its Customer Relationship Management program that can increase its customer loyalty. 1 INTRODUCTION small number of studies on customer loyalty in the bank, as a result of understanding about the loyalty 1.1 Background and satisfaction of Islamic bank’s customers is still confusing, and there is a very limited clarification The phenomenon underlying this study is the low about Customer Relationship Management (CRM) as a good influence on customer satisfaction and its
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccine Management Plan
    Vaccine Management Plan KEEP YOUR MANAGEMENT PLAN NEAR THE VACCINE STORAGE UNITS Practices must maintain a vaccine management plan for routine and emergency situations to protect vaccines and minimize loss due to negligence. The Vaccine Coordinator and Backup are responsible for implementing the plan. Instructions: Complete this form and make sure key practice staff sign and acknowledge the signature log whenever your plan is revised. Ensure that all content (including emergency contact information and alternate vaccine storage location) is up to date. Keep the plan in a location easily accessible to staff and available for review by VFC Field Representatives during site visits. (For practices using mobile units to administer VFC vaccines: Complete the VFC “Mobile Unit Vaccine Management Plan” to itemize equipment and record practice protocols specific to mobile units.) Section 1: Important Contacts KEY PRACTICE STAFF & ROLES Office/Practice Name VFC PIN Number Address Role Name Title Phone # Alt Phone # E-mail Provider of Record Provider of Record Designee Vaccine Coordinator Backup Vaccine Coordinator Immunization Champion (optional) Receives vaccines Stores vaccines Handles shipping issues Monitors storage unit temperatures USEFUL EMERGENCY NUMBERS Service Name Phone # Alt Phone # E-mail VFC Field Representative VFC Call Center 1-877-243-8832 Utility Company Building Maintenance Building Alarm Company Refrigerator/Freezer Alarm Company Refrigerator/Freezer Repair Point of Contact for Vaccine Transport www.eziz.org 1 IMM-1122 (12/20)
    [Show full text]
  • Group Housing Cooperatives
    C O O P ! S E R V A T I O N S Group Housing Cooperatives: !e Expanding Alternative to Meet New Needs in a Changing Society By Jim Jones In recent years, the cost of housing has instantly bring a new member into a ready-made increased much more rapidly than average salaries. social group. While housing has always been problem for low Because young people seldom plan to stay in jobs income wage earners (including students who don’t for more than a few years, equity accumulation in have wealthy parents), it is becoming an increasing housing is rarely a concern. Renting is the realistic problem for young professionals. For many with alternative, and the control that comes through college degrees, entry level salaries just don’t go group ownership is seen as a value to those who Ideas and opinions as far as they used to – particularly after making have spent years suffering under landlords or in on cooperative student loan payments. university residence halls. housing Many in this group are single, unsure of what Even though the privacy of a room is important, they want to do and where they want to do it, highly the space of an entire apartment is generally not mobile, and in many ways lifestyles are still similar as important. Young, single people have fewer to those of students. Graduation from college can possessions and less need for space than those with also mean the stress of a new job in a new city far spouses, children and years of accumulated “stuff.” from friends and familiar surroundings.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative Housing Bulletin
    COOPERATIVE HOUSING BULLETIN A member service of the National Association of Housing Cooperatives August/September 2008 National Affordable Housing Initiative Launched ROC USA Rolls Out Resident Ownership in owned communities. Join Us for Manufactured-Home Communities in 29 States In New NAHC’s Annual CFED, Fannie Mae, Ford Foundation, NCB Capital Hampshire, the Loan Fund has helped Conference > Impact, New Hampshire Community Loan Fund Invest $7 Million in new organization homeowners in Houston, TX 84 communities Concord, NH – The New Hampshire Community Sept. 17–20, 2008 Loan Fund (the Loan Fund), the Corporation for establish their own Enterprise Development (CFED) corporations to inside and NCB Capital Impact launched purchase and manage a new organization, ROC USA in the community. May of 2008. Beyond New Hampshire, Jerry Voorhis hundreds of cooperatives made Legacy ROC USA aims to help the 3.5 million American families living in up of owners of mobile and 3 manufactured-home communities manufactured homes have bought acquire the communities in which communities — in California, they live. ROC USA’s mission is to Florida and states in between. Members News make resident ownership a viable However, there has never been a 5 choice for homeowners in the U.S. standardized model or a coordinated strategy, so Those are the headlines. Now, how is ROC USA successes have been localized and dispersed. ROC USA aims to move resident ownership to scale. “We FCH-Assisted Co-ops LLC planning to fulfill its mission? By following achieve scale when every homeowner in every U.S. in Puerto Rico what the Loan Fund has been doing since 1984 in New Hampshire — help “homeowners” in “parks” community is presented with a viable choice as to 7 buy their communities, when they become available.
    [Show full text]
  • Earned Value Management: What Is It? Who Needs
    Franklin Training Group EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT: WHAT IS IT? WHO NEEDS IT? Capturing Opportunities for Performance Excellence Earned Value Management 1 Chet Franklin ASQ 711 July 2008 What is EVM? Franklin Training Group • EVM; Earned Value Management • For the management of projects • It is called: – A concept – A discipline – An approach – A program • A set of tools Capturing Opportunities for Performance Excellence Earned Value Management 2 Chet Franklin ASQ 711 July 2008 Who needs it? Franklin Training Group • No one NEEDS it • Who can use it? – Program Managers – Project Managers – Project Teams – Budget Analysts – Planners Capturing Opportunities for Performance Excellence Earned Value Management 3 Chet Franklin ASQ 711 July 2008 Project Managers Need Franklin Training Group • Plan – What is to be done? – When is it to be done? – What will it cost? • Tracking – What has been done? – When was it done? – What did it cost? Capturing Opportunities for Performance Excellence Earned Value Management 4 Chet Franklin ASQ 711 July 2008 What will EVM do? Franklin Training Group • Provide Project Status – Financial performance – Schedule performance • Provide information – Identify risks – Predict future performance • Financial – Cost-to-Complete • Schedule – Variance from plan Capturing Opportunities for Performance Excellence Earned Value Management 5 Chet Franklin ASQ 711 July 2008 Is EVM New? Franklin Training Group • NO! • The basic concepts? – They’ve been around for a 100 years, or so – PVA (Planned Value of Work Accomplished) – BCWP
    [Show full text]
  • Organization and Management of Cooperative and Mutual Housing Associations
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR L. B. Schwellenbach, Secretary BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS A . F. Hinrichs, Acting Commissioner Organization and Management of Cooperative and Mutual Housing Associations Bulletin No. 858 (Revision of Bulletin No. 608) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price 20 cents Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Letter of Transmittal U nited S tates D epartm ent of L abor, B ureau of L abor Statistics, Washington, February h 1946. T h e Secretary of L abo r: I have the honor to transmit herewith a pamphlet setting forth the proper methods of procedure for the organization and management of cooperative and mutual housing associations. The present report is a revision of the Bureau’s Bulletin No. 608, bringing the subject matter into conformity with present practice. Many persons within and without the cooperative movement, qualified by experience and training, have contributed to this manual. Their number includes housing experts, architects, and attorneys, as well as cooperators who have participated in one or more housing projects. In addition to Florence E. Parker and Alexander Findlay of its own staff, the Bureau wishes especially to acknowledge the valuable contributions and suggestions of Dale Johnson, Huson Jackson, Dorothy Kenyon, and Udo Rail. A . F . H in r ic h s, Acting Commissioner. H on. L . B . SCHWELLENBACH, Secretary of Labor. iii Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Bs /Organizational Management
    ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT- B.S. /ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT- B.P.S. Primary Faculty, New York State: Dr. Claire Henry (Assessment Faculty), Julie Hood-Baldomir (Dept. Chair), Dr. Douglas LePelley, Dr. Elena Murphy (Assessment Faculty) Mission The Bachelor of Science in Organizational Management is an upper division degree program. Through a cohort-based model of learning, the program prepares students to create positive change both organizationally and individually, through developing their ability to assess organizations and utilize innovative and strategic solutions to help organizations achieve extraordinary results. Student Learning Goals The OM Student Learning Goals are categorized within the framework of the Nyack College core values. Through an academically rigorous interdisciplinary curriculum, adult students in the Organizational Management program will be able to: Academically Excellent: o Demonstrate the ability skills in the use of technology, communication, and research as it relates to scholarship. o Develop analytical thinking skills as tools for problem solving in the workplace. Globally Engaged: o Demonstrate fluency in using ethical theories as a framework for positioning organizations as responsible, global citizens Intentionally Diverse: o Demonstrate the ability to utilize diverse perspectives as a, means to solving problems and initiating change within an organizational context Personally Transforming: o Develop process in which to assess and promote personal growth, development and life-long learning Socially Relevant:
    [Show full text]
  • Combatting Inequality Through Employee Ownership
    COMBATTING INEQUALITY THROUGH EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP Worker Cooperatives and Employee Stock Ownership Programs in Buffalo-Niagara Kristin Ksiazek and Annabel Bacon Introduction Communities across the United States are grappling with income inequality. Since 1979, earnings of the top one percent of Americans have risen by a staggering 157%, compared to an increase of just 22.2% for the bottom 90% of workers.1 Today, 44 percent of American workers earn less than $18,000 per year, while the CEOs of the largest 350 companies earn, on average, $18.9 million per year.2 From 1978 to 2018, compensation for CEOs grew 940.3%, but wages for typical, nonsupervisory workers grew by just 11.9%.3 Wealth gaps between the most privileged and marginalized social and demographic groups have widened by even larger amounts—to the point where, in 2015, for every dollar in wealth owned by white households, black and Latinx households held just six and eight cents, respectively; and women owned only 32 cents for every dollar held by men.4 Equally as troubling, present generations are far less likely than their parents and grandparents to experience upward economic mobility,5 and they are burdened by much more student debt.6 Job seekers of all educational backgrounds are faced with fewer choices in the American labor market, where much of the recent job growth has come in the form of low-wage work.7 This trend means that low income workers do not have the option to simply “find better paying jobs.” Rather, the data show that “there are not enough living wage jobs to go around.”8 The lack of living-wage jobs disproportionately affects women and workers of color.
    [Show full text]