DOCSLIB.ORG

Management Manual for UNESCO Biosphere Reserves in Africa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Management Manual for UNESCO Biosphere Reserves in Africa Management Manual for UNESCO Biosphere Reserves in Africa A practical guide for managers United Nations Man and Educational, Scientific the biosphere and Cultural Organisation Programme Management Manual for UNESCO Biosphere Reserves in Africa A practical guide for managers Prof Dr Wafaa Amer, Sheila Ashong and Dr Djafarou Tiomoko edited by the German Commission for UNESCO in collaboration with AfriMAB, ArabMAB and the UNESCO MAB Secretariat 3 IMPRINT Management Manual for UNESCO Biosphere Reserves in Africa A practical guide for managers Editor German Commission for UNESCO Colmantstrasse 15 | 53115 Bonn | Germany www.unesco.de Authors: Professor Dr Wafaa Amer, Sheila Ashong and Dr Djafarou Tiomoko Responsible editor: Dr Lutz Möller Graphical illustrations: Gareth Williams, Sparx Media Illustrators, www.sparx.co.za Photograph authors are indicated in the captions. Publication data: June 2015 Creative Commons Licence CC BY-SA 4.0 international (excluding copyrighted illustrations and photographs) ISBN: 978-3-940785-73-2 The German National Library lists this publication in the German National Bibliography Detailed biblio- graphic data are available at: http://dnb.ddb.de Suggested citation: German Commission for UNESCO (2015). Management Manual for UNESCO Biosphere Reserves in Africa. For downloading the digital version of this Manual: http://bit.ly/1E8sjfU The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO or the German Commission for UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO or the German Commission for UNESCO. This publication was funded and supported by the Federal Agency for Nature Conservation of the Federal Republic of Ger- many, with funding from the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building, and Nuclear Safety. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: BIOSPHERE RESERVES, an introduction ....................................................................................................................14 1.1 Why do we need this Manual? .........................................................................................................................................................14 1.2 Who should read this Manual and why ...........................................................................................................................................15 1.3 UNESCO and its MAB Programme ................................................................................................................................................16 1.4 UNESCO biosphere reserves – The essentials ................................................................................................................................17 Key characteristics .................................................................................................................................................................................17 Three functions and three zones ............................................................................................................................................................17 Key documents .....................................................................................................................................................................................18 Different institutional approaches, one objective ..................................................................................................................................18 A snapshot: What does “managing a biosphere reserve” actually mean? .............................................................................................19 1.5 The context and benefits of UNESCO biosphere reserves – in Africa ............................................................................................20 UNESCO biosphere reserves support sustainable development in Africa ...........................................................................................21 UNESCO biosphere reserves and protected areas .................................................................................................................................21 Key achievements and key benefits of UNESCO biosphere reserves ..................................................................................................22 Concrete examples from African UNESCO biosphere reserves: .........................................................................................................23 SECTION 2: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT – POPULATION – CONFLICTS – KNOWLEDGE ........................................... 26 2.1 Sustainable Development ................................................................................................................................................................. 26 Defining sustainable development ......................................................................................................................................................... 26 Improving livelihoods and generating income for communities ........................................................................................................... 28 Biodiversity and ecosystem services ..................................................................................................................................................... 29 Sustainable land-use and resource use ................................................................................................................................................... 32 Ecosystem restoration ........................................................................................................................................................................... 33 Disaster reduction and risk management ............................................................................................................................................... 35 Tourism ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 35 Climate change ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 38 2.2 Management and participation ........................................................................................................................................................ 39 Management ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 39 Planning ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 40 Participation in management and planning ............................................................................................................................................ 41 What is the population, what are stakeholders? ..................................................................................................................................... 42 Vulnerable groups .................................................................................................................................................................................. 43 Fundamental principles of participation ................................................................................................................................................ 44 2.3 Conflict management ...................................................................................................................................................................... 45 Managing conflicts within the biosphere reserve .................................................................................................................................. 46 Managing external pressures ................................................................................................................................................................. 47 Benefit-sharing ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 48 Co-management ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 49 Acute escalation of conflicts .................................................................................................................................................................. 50 2.4 The role of knowledge in management ........................................................................................................................................... 52 What knowledge and what research are needed for managing a biosphere reserve? ............................................................................ 54 Science and traditional knowledge .......................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Waterberg Biosphere Reserve 2001 - 2012
    WATERBERG BIOSPHERE RESERVE 2001 - 2012 APPLICATION FOR EXPANSION OF RESERVE TO UNESCO MAB COMMISSION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY September 2012 1 INTRODUCTION Some years ago renowned conservationist Clive Walker predicted that the Waterberg would yet emerge as one of the most important and significant conservation areas in South Africa. With a great potential for tourism, game ranching, hunting and environmental awareness, together with the richness and abundance of biodiversity in both plant and animal life, the Waterberg is an incredibly important area for conservation in the South African context. Recent conservation plans at both the provincial and national levels recognise the importance of the Waterberg Mountain Complex ecosystem and with this support the Waterberg Biosphere Reserve’s next step to ensure good governance of the area is to expand the current biosphere to include all of the Waterberg Mountain Complex to provide ecosystem and land use planning integrity. A biosphere reserve is a designated area of importance that falls outside the confined protected areas network such as provincial game reserves and national parks. It is also an area where people live and work. The area can include villages, towns, farming and agriculture, tourism, hunting, businesses and services. The main aim of the biosphere reserve is to ensure that while people utilise the area for their livelihoods and produce a strong economy, negative impacts on the environment and the area‟s reputation as a tourism destination are kept to a minimum and ecosystems remain intact and in good health. There are specific criteria that an area must have to qualify for biosphere reserve status.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Council
    braden-jarvis | Unsplash The Environmental Council Annual Report 2019 Table of Contents 2 CHAIR’S MESSAGE 3 DIRECTOR’S MESSAGE 4 HAWAII GREEN GROWTH - ALOHA+ CHALLENGE OVERVIEW 5 STATE AGENCY ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMARIES & CONCLUSIONS 18 COUNCIL AND STAFF BIOS dlnr 1 Chair’s Message PUANANIONAONA “ONAONA” THOENE 2019 was another the Council held several informational sessions on the exciting and busy nuts and bolts of the new rules, as wells as outreach ses- year for the Council. sions with State and County agencies to assist with the Since 2016 when transition to the new rules. The Council also assisted Governor Ige ap- OEQC in preparing exemption guidance for use by the pointed a full Coun- agencies during this process. cil, the Council and the Office of Envi- In addition to completing rulemaking, the Council ronmental Quali- and OEQC also organized an invasive species and biose- ty Control (OEQC) curity forum in cooperation with the State Department worked relentlessly of Land and Natural Resources and the University of to update Hawaiʻi Hawaiʻi William S. Richardson School of Law. The fo- Administrative Rules (HAR), Title 11, Chapter 200, the rum, featuring leading experts on this critical issue, can Environmental Impact Statement Rules. The Coun- be viewed at: https://vimeo.com/showcase/5886423. cil thanks Governor Ige, the Hawaiʻi State Legislature, The Council also organized an informative brown bag OEQC, the Department of Health, and the many State forum on the protection of seabirds. Both forums were and County agencies and members of the public who well attended by members of the public and agency participated in this process which resulted in a success- staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Tulbagh Renosterveld Project Report
    BP TULBAGH RENOSTERVELD PROJECT Introduction The Cape Floristic Region (CFR) is the smallest and richest floral kingdom of the world. In an area of approximately 90 000km² there are over 9 000 plant species found (Goldblatt & Manning 2000). The CFR is recognized as one of the 33 global biodiversity hotspots (Myers, 1990) and has recently received World Heritage Status. In 2002 the Cape Action Plan for the Environment (CAPE) programme identified the lowlands of the CFR as 100% irreplaceable, meaning that to achieve conservation targets all lowland fragments would have to be conserved and no further loss of habitat should be allowed. Renosterveld , an asteraceous shrubland that predominantly occurs in the lowland areas of the CFR, is the most threatened vegetation type in South Africa . Only five percent of this highly fragmented vegetation type still remains (Von Hase et al 2003). Most of these Renosterveld fragments occur on privately owned land making it the least represented vegetation type in the South African Protected Areas network. More importantly, because of the fragmented nature of Renosterveld it has a high proportion of plants that are threatened with extinction. The Custodians of Rare and Endangered Wildflowers (CREW) project, which works with civil society groups in the CFR to update information on threatened plants, has identified the Tulbagh valley as a high priority for conservation action. This is due to the relatively large amount of Renosterveld that remains in the valley and the high amount of plant endemism. The CAPE program has also identified areas in need of fine scale plans and the Tulbagh area falls within one of these: The Upper Breede River planning domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Partitioning Between Black-Backed Jackal and Brown Hyaena in Waterberg Biosphere Reserve, South Africa
    Ramnanan et al. Jackal and hyaena in South Africa Copyright © 2016 by the IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group. ISSN 1478-2677 Research report Resource partitioning between black-backed jackal and brown hyaena in Waterberg Biosphere Reserve, South Africa Rivona Ramnanan1, Michelle Thorn1, Craig J. Tambling2 and Michael J. Somers 1, 3* 1 Centre for Wildlife Management, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa. 2 Centre for African Conservation Ecology, Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, 6031, South Africa. 3 Centre for Invasion Biology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa. Email: [email protected] * Correspondence author Keywords: apex predators, dietary niche, human modification, resource partitioning. Abstract Understanding resource partitioning by predators is important for understanding coexistence patterns, with this becoming more relevant as historical food webs are altered through human impacts. Using scat analysis, we investigated the diet overlap of two sympatric meso-carnviores, the black-backed jackal Canis mesomelas and brown hyaena Hyaena brunnea, in Waterberg Biosphere Reserve, South Africa. Scats (n = 30 jackal, 42 brown hyaena) were collected in April 2012 from game and livestock farms. When comparing main prey categories (medium-large mam- mal, small mammal, fruit, invertebrate, reptile, and bird) we found little difference in diets, with both carnivores con- suming predominantly medium-large mammals (10-100kg). Bushbuck Tragelaphus scriptus was the most commonly consumed large mammal species for both predators. Jackal and brown hyaena had, on average, 1.3 and 1.4 main prey categories per scat respectively which resulted in diet diversities of 3.9 for jackal and 2.5 for brown hyaena.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal to Provide Environmental Consultant Services to the Town of Lyons
    Smith Environmental & Engineering Sustainable Environmental Solutions Proposal to Provide Environmental Consultant Services to the Town of Lyons RFP-JK-1610 Prepared for the Town of Lyons by Smith Environmental & Engineering Due Date and Time: September 9, 2016, 4:30 PM MT www.smithdelivers.com 1490 W. 121st Ave. Suite 101 Westminster, CO 80234 phone: 720.887.4928 fax: 720.887.4680 Table of Contents 1.0 COVER LETTER .............................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 STATEMENT OF PROJECT UNDERSTANDING .............................................................................. 3 3.0 PROPOSED METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................. 4 4.0 QUALIFICATIONS ........................................................................................................................................ 6 4.1 OVERALL COMPANY QUALIFICATIONS .............................................................................................................. 6 4.2 PROJECT TEAM, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ............................................................................................ 7 4.3 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART ........................................................................................................................................ 9 4.4 RESUMES .............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Discourse of Sustainable Development: Business Groups, Local Government and Ngos In
    London School of Economics and Political Sciences The discourse of sustainable development: business groups, local government and NGOs in Juarez (Mexico) and El Paso (USA) PhD Thesis Claudia Granados Sociology Department December 2003 UMI Number: U222167 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U222167 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 I H S £ S F For F.G. and my pa ABSTRACT The thesis proposes and develops a threefold categorisation as a framework for the analysis of the sustainable development (SD) discourse of business groups, local government and NGOs in the Mexico-US border region and specifically in the border cities of Juarez (Chihuahua, Mexico) and El Paso (Texas, US). The SD categorisation proposed in this thesis consists of three schools of thought, namely, Ecologism, Ecologically-sustainable-Development (EsD) and Corporate-Environmentalism. The thesis investigates how and why Corporate- Environmentalism came to dominate sustainable development discourse in the 1990s? Based on data collected in the border region of Juarez and El Paso, this thesis argues that Corporate-Environmentalism strongly influenced the sustainable development discourse of business groups, local government and NGOs and became the prevailing orthodoxy in the sustainable development discourse of the region during the 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Management
    FACT SHEET The Landowner’s Guide to FIRE MANAGEMENT eriodic natural fires have always occurred in fynbos and probably in renosterveld systems too. Many plants actually need fires to reproduce and ensure their long-term survival. The Pchallenge now is to use fire in a fragmented and highly modified modern landscape to ensure the survival of all plant and animal species that live in the landscape. Although fynbos is a fire-adapted system, just one or two inappropriate fires at the wrong time of year or wrong frequency, can cause the local extinction of many species. The most important use of fire for conservation management is to maintain viable populations of all existing plant and animal species. The use of fire to achieve other management objectives should always take this into account. These may include: reduction in fuel load to prevent unmanageable wildfires, the control of invasive alien plants, increase in water yield from catchments, promoting desirable plants for the flower picking industry, or improving grazing. Principles of Fire Management Frequency can contain a high proportion of grasses, which are fast- growing and highly flammable, renosterveld can be The interval between fires should largely be deter- burned more frequently than fynbos, possibly every mined by the growth rate of existing plants. No fire three to 10 years. However, renosterveld is far less should be permitted in fynbos until at least 50% dependent on fire than fynbos. of the population of the slowest-maturing species in an area have flowered for at least Light is important for bulb flowering and the germina- three successive seasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Canuto-Et-Al.-2018.Pdf
    RESEARCH ◥ shows field systems in the low-lying wetlands RESEARCH ARTICLE SUMMARY and terraces in the upland areas. The scale of wetland systems and their association with dense populations suggest centralized planning, ARCHAEOLOGY whereas upland terraces cluster around res- idences, implying local management. Analy- Ancient lowland Maya complexity as sis identified 362 km2 of deliberately modified ◥ agricultural terrain and ON OUR WEBSITE another 952 km2 of un- revealed by airborne laser scanning Read the full article modified uplands for at http://dx.doi. potential swidden use. of northern Guatemala org/10.1126/ Approximately 106 km science.aau0137 of causeways within and .................................................. Marcello A. Canuto*†, Francisco Estrada-Belli*†, Thomas G. Garrison*†, between sites constitute Stephen D. Houston‡, Mary Jane Acuña, Milan Kováč, Damien Marken, evidence of inter- and intracommunity con- Philippe Nondédéo, Luke Auld-Thomas‡, Cyril Castanet, David Chatelain, nectivity. In contrast, sizable defensive features Carlos R. Chiriboga, Tomáš Drápela, Tibor Lieskovský, Alexandre Tokovinine, point to societal disconnection and large-scale Antolín Velasquez, Juan C. Fernández-Díaz, Ramesh Shrestha conflict. 2 CONCLUSION: The 2144 km of lidar data Downloaded from INTRODUCTION: Lowland Maya civilization scholars has provided a unique regional perspec- acquired by the PLI alter interpretations of the flourished from 1000 BCE to 1500 CE in and tive revealing substantial ancient population as ancient Maya at a regional scale. An ancient around the Yucatan Peninsula. Known for its well as complex previously unrecognized land- population in the millions was unevenly distrib- sophistication in writing, art, architecture, as- scape modifications at a grand scale throughout uted across the central lowlands, with varying tronomy, and mathematics, this civilization is the central lowlands in the Yucatan peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Deforestation on Biodiversity, Soil Carbon Stocks, Soil Quality, Runoff and Sediment Yield at Southwest Ethiopia’S Forest Frontier
    Impact of deforestation on biodiversity, soil carbon stocks, soil quality, runoff and sediment yield at southwest Ethiopia’s forest frontier Henok Kassa Tegegne Proefschrift voorgedragen tot het behalen van de graad van Doctor in de Wetenschappen Geografie Faculteit Wetenschappen Henok Kassa Tegegne Impact of deforestation on biodiversity, soil carbon stocks, soil quality, runoff and sediment yield at southwest Ethiopia’s forest frontier Proefschrift voorgelegd tot het behalen van de graad van Doctor in de Wetenschappen: Geografie 2016-2017 Copyright: Henok Kassa 2017 Published by: Department of Geography - Ghent University Krijgslaan 281 (S8), 9000 Gent (Belgium) (c) All rights reserved. ix x Promoter: Prof. Dr. Jan Nyssen, Department of Geography, Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium Co-promoter: Prof. Dr. Jean Poesen, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Section of Geography and Tourism, KU Leuven, Belgium Members of the Jury: Prof. Dr. Nico Vandeweghe, Department of Geography, Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium (Chair) Dr. Denyse Snelder, Senior Advisor Natural Resources Management, VU Amsterdam, The Netherlands Prof. Dr. Stefaan Dondeyne, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Section of Soil and Water Management, KU Leuven, Belgium Prof. Dr. Ann Verdoodt, Department of Soil Management, Faculty of Biosciences Engineering, Ghent University, Belgium Dr. Amaury Frankl, Department of Geography, Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium (secretary) Dr. Miro Jacob, Department of Geography, Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium Dean: Prof. Dr. Herwig Dejonghe Rector: Prof. Dr. Anne De Paepe xi xii Acknowledgements First and foremost, I thank the Almighty God for granting me the capability and patience to accomplish the study. Firstly, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my promoters Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Working for People and the Environment
    biodiversitybusiness BIODIVERSITY WORKING FOR PEOPLE AND THE ENVIRONMENT Innovative business and biodiversity projects are currently underway in the Cape Floristic Region – involving creative partnerships between agricultural producers, industry associations, retailers, communities and conservationists, working together to conserve valuable biodiversity. This brochure presents case studies from the 2006 C.A.P.E. Partners' Conference and developments to 2008. The conference focused in part on the theme of "Biodiversity Business". At the conference key stakeholders presented examples of businesses, both big and small, that have a material impact on biodiversity* or benefit directly from the biodiversity of the Cape Floristic Region, helping to develop participants' understanding of the complex dynamics of biodiversity-based business. *Biodiversity refers to all the genes, species, ecosystems and processes that allow life to persist over time. When biodiversity is intact, species and ecosystems are resilient, enabling them to adapt to environmental changes including global climate change. When biodiversity is lost, nature responds unpredictably, making it difficult for growers to plan production and protect natural resources. BIODIVERSITY OF THE CAPE FLORISTIC REGION Stretching from the Cederberg in the north-west, around the Western Cape coast and into the Eastern Cape up to the Nelson Mandela Metropole, the Cape Floristic Region (CFR) is world famous for its dramatic and varied land- and seascapes and its astonishing diversity of plant and animal life. As one of only six floral kingdoms in the world and with 9 600 recorded plant species, 70% of them found nowhere else on the planet, the CFR is a biodiversity hotspot. Under increasing pressure from human development, it is also one of the world's 25 most threatened hotspots.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF (212K)
    Searching for a Way out of Social Discrimination: A Case Study of the Manjo through the 2002 Incident in Kafa SAYURI YOSHIDA Nagoya University Under the present Ethiopian government, social discrimination is a human rights issue. De- spite the national policy of the right to self-determination launched by the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front, the Manjo, a socially discriminated minority who live in the western Kafa and eastern Sheka zones, feel that they are being deprived of this right. In 2002, the Manjo attacked the Kafa in an attempt to put an end to this discrimination. Knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the Manjo uprising is essential for understanding the confl ict. Th is article describes these circumstances and the changes brought about by the incident. Key words: Kafa, Manjo, social discrimination, minorities, confl icts 1. INTRODUCTION In this article, I investigate the social background of an armed attack against the Kafa by the Manjo. In March 2002, Manjo living in Bita wäräda in the Kafa zone and Yeki wäräda in the Sheka zone of the Southern Nations Nationalities People’s Region (SNNPR) mounted an attack on their Kafa neighbors. Many Kafa were killed and their houses burned to the ground. Th e attack was violent, especially in Woshero k’ebele and Shota k’ebele of Bita wäräda. Th e Manjo are a minority group who live in pockets in the Kafa, Sheka, Benchi Maji, and Dawro zones and the Konta special wäräda in SNNPR. Th ey also occupy the Oromia and Gambella Re- gional States. Manjo living in the Kafa zone have long been discriminated against by the Kafa.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Sample Procurement Plan (Text in italic font is meant for instruction to staff and should be deleted in the final version of the PP) Public Disclosure Authorized (This is only a sample with the minimum content that is required to be included in the PAD. The detailed procurement plan is still mandatory for disclosure on the Bank’s website in accordance with the guidelines. The initial procurement plan will cover the first 18 months of the project and then updated annually or earlier as necessary). I. General 1. Bank’s approval Date of the procurement Plan: Updated Procurement Plan, M 2. Date of General Procurement Notice: Dec 24, 2006 Public Disclosure Authorized 3. Period covered by this procurement plan: The procurement period of project covered from year June 2010 to December 2012 II. Goods and Works and non-consulting services. 1. Prior Review Threshold: Procurement Decisions subject to Prior Review by the Bank as stated in Appendix 1 to the Guidelines for Procurement: [Thresholds for applicable procurement methods (not limited to the list below) will be determined by the Procurement Specialist /Procurement Accredited Staff based on the assessment of the implementing agency’s capacity.] Public Disclosure Authorized Procurement Method Prior Review Comments Threshold US$ 1. ICB and LIB (Goods) Above US$ 500,000 All 2. NCB (Goods) Above US$ 100,000 First contract 3. ICB (Works) Above US$ 15 million All 4. NCB (Works) Above US$ 5 million All 5. (Non-Consultant Services) Below US$ 100,000 First contract [Add other methods if necessary] 2. Prequalification. Bidders for _Not applicable_ shall be prequalified in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 2.9 and 2.10 of the Public Disclosure Authorized Guidelines.
    [Show full text]