DOCSLIB.ORG

Minerals Planning Options Paper Officer Response to Responses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Minerals Planning Options Paper Officer Response to Responses Somerset County Council Minerals Planning Options Paper Officer Response to Responses March 2012 Page 1 of 193 Document Control Sheet Reviewed and approved by Paul Browning: Planning Policy Manager (04/06/2014) Minerals and Waste Policy Team Somerset County Council Environment Directorate PP C601C County Hall Taunton TA1 4DY ℡ 0845 345 9188 [email protected] www.somerset.gov.uk/mineralsandwaste Page 2 of 193 Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................... 4 1 Vision and Plan Objectives ........................................................................ 7 2 Aggregates .............................................................................................. 23 3 Peat ......................................................................................................... 91 4 Building Stone ........................................................................................ 117 5 Mineral Safeguarding Areas .................................................................. 136 6 Development Management .................................................................... 151 7 Additional Comments ............................................................................. 159 Page 3 of 193 Introduction This document contains details of the representations made on the Somerset County Council Minerals Options Paper during the consultation period 15 th December 2011 to 12 th February 2012. The consultation documents were published on www.somersetconsults.org.uk and were accompanied by a questionnaire. The County Council's Minerals and Waste policy team encouraged respondents to reply via this website if possible and provided printed copies of the consultation document via Somerset’s libraries and Council Offices or on request. The team promoted the consultation via email and letter mailings, as well as through the Somerset County Council website. Local media were involved, presentations were given at district and parish events, briefing notes were circulated at district and parish events, and meetings were arranged with consultees. Postcards were sent out to approximately 3000 residents who live in, or in close proximity to existing minerals consultation areas – highlighting that the Minerals Options consultation was underway and how to get involved. Prior to the consultation, all consultees (contactable by email) were emailed to determine how they wished to be notified of the Minerals Options consultation. This helped to shape the approach to consultation and engage in an optimal way. National Policy At the time of writing this document the final National Planning Policy Framework had not been published. Therefore the collation and consideration of all respondents’ representations and SCC responses in this document are made prior to the publication of the Framework. The Preferred Options document for Somerset minerals policy will be informed by consultation feedback in this document and the evolving national policy framework. Page 4 of 193 Representation summary Representations were sought on a wide range of issues. 86 respondents replied, which can be divided into 1195 representations (individual comments). The majority of respondents supported the proposals outlined, beginning with broad support for the proposed Vision and Objectives, with some constructive comments made to ensure that the final wording is as clear as possible; in particular, several representors highlighted the need for further clarity in reference to "limits set by the environment" in Objective A, and the need to ensure each Objective does not try to cover too many different ideas - in particular Objective C needs to be reviewed with this in mind. Opinion was spread on the size of crushed rock landback, with some suggesting 10 years, some 15 years (in line with policy in the adopted Minerals Local Plan) and some 20 years or more. Opinion was also mixed when additional reserves are needed for a demand that cannot be met from existing reserves (Issue A2), the approach to take on managing the shortfall in sand and gravel reserves (Issues A4) and the restoration of sites (Issue A5). On this last-named matter, broadly the same number of respondents supported restoration of sites in the East Mendips on a site-by-site basis as supported a more strategic landscape approach. There was strong support for the supply of local building stone for local demand, whilst recognising markets outside of the County and the need to support the building stone industry to maintain its economic viability. Furthermore there was support for the mineral types listed for safeguarding. There was general consensus that no further peat permissions should be granted. This aligns with the direction of national policy, in particular the emerging National Planning Policy Framework. And there was broad support for the coverage of Development Management topics proposed. In addition, comments were welcomed on a range of other issues including, but not limited to: • dormant and abandoned minerals sites in Somerset; • the importance for restoration of all minerals sites taking an holistic approach that where possible seeks to reflect changes in the industry, national planning policy, and new biodiversity targets and initiatives; • the importance of Somerset’s water resources, especially the Mendip Hills groundwater resource; and • ensuring that the County Council has a robust framework in place to consider the potential of oil and gas extraction in Somerset.. Page 5 of 193 Below is a summary of the number of representations received to the questions presented in the Minerals Options consultation Question Number of representations number 1 71 2 65 3 32 4 62 5 29 6 60 7 26 8 30 9 32 10 49 11 68 12 34 13 66 14 27 15 25 16 59 17 20 18 48 19 51 20 19 21 85 22 26 23 30 24 31 25 36 26 28 27 29 28 57 Total 11 95 Please note : A full set of representations is presented below, together with a response from the Minerals Planning Authority as to how all comments have been considered. Some representations contain spelling or grammar errors. Representations have been reproduced faithfully so as not to inadvertently alter or nuance the intended meaning. Since writing this document in accordance with the requirements of the National Planning Policy Framework and the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012, the emerging Somerset Minerals Core Strategy has been renamed the Somerset Minerals Plan. However, this document has not been updated to reflect this change and still refers to the Minerals Core Strategy. Page 6 of 193 1 Vision and Plan Objectives The Minerals Options Paper included the following vision and plan objectives… Vision for mineral extraction in Somerset : To ensure sustainable supply and use of minerals to meet society’s needs without unacceptable impact upon Somerset’s environment or communities. Objective A: To ensure that Somerset is able to provide an adequate and steady supply of minerals in accordance with government guidance in order to contribute to national, regional and local requirements within the limits set by the environment. Objective B: To protect Somerset’s residents from impacts on human health associated with minerals extraction and transportation whilst recognising the benefits of the minerals industry, including provision of jobs. Objective C: To protect the natural and historic environment of Somerset from impacts associated with minerals extraction and transportation recognising the potential for increased conflicts of interest due to climate change, particularly on the water environment, and opportunities for positive land use change in the long term. Objective D: To promote the efficient production and use of primary minerals, together with the minimisation of waste, increased substitution of alternative materials, and appropriate timing of release of reserves thereby reducing the impact of mineral production on climate change and protecting finite resources. Objective E: To reduce the impacts arising from minerals transportation on local communities and the climate by maximising opportunity for mineral movement by rail or water. Objective F: To seek a positive contribution from the minerals industry whilst sites are operational in terms of improved carbon management and ongoing and final site restoration incorporating environmental and community enhancements such as, biodiversity, geo -diversity, landscape, recreation and access. Page 7 of 193 Objective G: To bring together the minerals industry and local communities to identify and implement suitable reclamation schemes at dormant or abandoned mineral workings that are problematic and unlikely to work again, for the benefit of local communities or the environment. Objective H: To avoid the unnecessary sterilisation of valuable mineral resources by other types of development. Question 1: Do you agree with the vision and objectives? Summary of responses to question 1 6% (2 responses) Agree Disagree 94% (31 responses) Page 8 of 193 Detailed Responses Rep Respondents’ comment s MPA Officer response s ID (in this section, the letters refer to the different Plan Objectives) R9.3 We are pleased with both the Vision and Objective C of the main Noted. document. R12 We support the need for minerals development in Somerset to avoid The potential to enhance the quality of the natural environment and unacceptable impacts to the environment. It would also be helpful to quality of life for communities
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Saints, Monks and Bishops; Cult and Authority in the Diocese of Wells (England) Before the Norman Conquest
    Peregrinations: Journal of Medieval Art and Architecture Volume 3 Issue 2 63-95 2011 Saints, Monks and Bishops; cult and authority in the diocese of Wells (England) before the Norman Conquest Michael Costen University of Bristol Follow this and additional works at: https://digital.kenyon.edu/perejournal Part of the Ancient, Medieval, Renaissance and Baroque Art and Architecture Commons Recommended Citation Costen, Michael. "Saints, Monks and Bishops; cult and authority in the diocese of Wells (England) before the Norman Conquest." Peregrinations: Journal of Medieval Art and Architecture 3, 2 (2011): 63-95. https://digital.kenyon.edu/perejournal/vol3/iss2/4 This Feature Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Art History at Digital Kenyon: Research, Scholarship, and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Peregrinations: Journal of Medieval Art and Architecture by an authorized editor of Digital Kenyon: Research, Scholarship, and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Costen Saints, Monks and Bishops; cult and authority in the diocese of Wells (England) before the Norman Conquest Michael Costen, University of Bristol, UK Introduction This paper is founded upon a database, assembled by the writer, of some 3300 instances of dedications to saints and of other cult objects in the Diocese of Bath and Wells. The database makes it possible to order references to an object in many ways including in terms of dedication, location, date, and possible authenticity, and it makes data available to derive some history of the object in order to assess the reliability of the information it presents.
    [Show full text]
  • BRSUG Number Mineral Name Hey Index Group Hey No
    BRSUG Number Mineral name Hey Index Group Hey No. Chem. Country Locality Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-37 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] U.K., 17 Basset Mines, nr. Redruth, Cornwall Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-151 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] U.K., 17 Phoenix mine, Cheese Wring, Cornwall Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-280 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] U.K., 17 County Bridge Quarry, Cornwall Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and South Caradon Mine, 4 miles N of Liskeard, B-319 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] U.K., 17 Cornwall Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-394 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] U.K., 17 ? Cornwall? Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-395 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] U.K., 17 Cornwall Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-539 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] North America, U.S.A Houghton, Michigan Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-540 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] North America, U.S.A Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan, Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu, Ag and B-541 Copper Au) 1.1 4[Cu] North America, U.S.A Keweenaw Peninsula, Michigan, Elements and Alloys (including the arsenides, antimonides and bismuthides of Cu,
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeolithic and Pleistocene Sites of the Mendip, Bath and Bristol Areas
    Proc. Univ. Bristol Spelacol. Soc, 19SlJ, 18(3), 367-389 PALAEOLITHIC AND PLEISTOCENE SITES OF THE MENDIP, BATH AND BRISTOL AREAS RECENT BIBLIOGRAPHY by R. W. MANSFIELD and D. T. DONOVAN Lists of references lo works on the Palaeolithic and Pleistocene of the area were published in these Proceedings in 1954 (vol. 7, no. 1) and 1964 (vol. 10, no. 2). In 1977 (vol. 14, no. 3) these were reprinted, being then out of print, by Hawkins and Tratman who added a list ai' about sixty papers which had come out between 1964 and 1977. The present contribution is an attempt to bring the earlier lists up to date. The 1954 list was intended to include all work before that date, but was very incomplete, as evidenced by the number of older works cited in the later lists, including the present one. In particular, newspaper reports had not been previously included, but are useful for sites such as the Milton Hill (near Wells) bone Fissure, as are a number of references in serials such as the annual reports of the British Association and of the Wells Natural History and Archaeological Society, which are also now noted for the first time. The largest number of new references has been generated by Gough's Cave, Cheddar, which has produced important new material as well as new studies of finds from the older excavations. The original lists covered an area from what is now the northern limit of the County of Avon lo the southern slopes of the Mendips. Hawkins and Tratman extended that area to include the Quaternary Burtle Beds which lie in the Somerset Levels to the south of the Mendips, and these are also included in the present list.
    [Show full text]
  • Mells River Sink — a Spelaeological Curiosity in East Mendip, Somerset
    93 Proc. Univ. Bristol Spelaeol. Soc, 1982, 16 (2), 93-104. MELLS RIVER SINK — A SPELAEOLOGICAL CURIOSITY IN EAST MENDIP, SOMERSET by W. I. STANTON ABSTRACT The site is a cleft in the side of the Mells River that acts as a resurgence in winter and a swallet in summer. An excavation, 1974-78, began 21m above, and ended 2m below, river level. It showed (hat a high-leve! resurgence was active in the Middle Devensian, and was buried under later deposits. Scattered finds of archaeological significance included Woolly Rhinoceros bones and a First Century bronze brooch. Water tracing experiments proved that the Sink is the upper end of an active underground oxbow to the Mells River, 2.5 km long. The cleft was developed along a neptunian dyke of Lower Lias age. Bubbling springs and 'cave, coral" are briefly discussed. INTRODUCTION The Mells River rises at Gurney Slade and flows east below the north flank of the Mendips to join the River Frome at Frome. It receives water from the Carboniferous Limestone resurgences of Winter Well, Gurney Slade, Ashwick Grove, St. Dunstan's Well, Whitehole, Cobby Wood, Hapsford and other smaller springs (Barrington and Stanton, 1977). Some of these resurgences fail in dry weather, and one of them, Mells River Sink, is so close to the river bed that, at times, the spring flow actually reverses and part of the river disappears down the hole. In the drought summer of 1976 about one quarter of the Mells River was lost into Mells River Sink. At the village of Mells the Mells River leaves undulating low ground to enter a wooded gorge (Wadbury Valley) incised by super imposed drainage into the north flank of East Mendip (Barrington and Stanton, 1977, p 220).
    [Show full text]
  • CPRS00002.Pdf
    Schedule to Certificate No CPRS 00002 Issue No: 8 Hanson Quarry Products Europe Ltd Hanson House, 14 Castle Hill, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 4JJ Manufacturing Plants Table Plant Address Postcode Abergele Quarry Nant Du Road, St George, Abergele, Conway LL22 9BD Appledore Wharf Bidna Yard, Hubbastone Road, Appledore, Bideford, Devon EX39 1LZ Auckley Quarry Hurst Lane, Auckley, Doncaster, South Yorkshire DN9 3HQ Austerfield Quarry Highfield Lane, High Street, Austerfield, Nr Doncaster, South Yorkshire DN10 6RG Barton Quarry off Walton Lane, Barton-under- Needwood, Staffordshire DE13 8EJ Baston Quarry Baston Fen, Peterborough, Cambridgeshire PE6 9QA Batts Combe Quarry Warrens Hill, Cheddar, Somerset BS27 3LR Birch Quarry Roundbush Corner, Maldon Road, Layer Marney, Colchester, Essex CO5 9XE Bozeat Quarry Bozeat, Wellingborough, Northamptonshire NN29 7UN Brayford Quarry Brayford, Barnstaple, Devon EX32 7QD Bridgwater Wharf Dunball, Bridgwater, Somerset TA6 4EJ Smiths Concrete, Waverley Wood Farm, Weston Lane, Bubbenhall, Bubbenhall Quarry CV8 3BN Coventry, Warwickshire Builth Quarry Llanelwedd, Builth Wells, Powys LD2 3UB Bulls Lodge Quarry Generals Lane, Boreham, Chelmsford, Essex CM3 3HR Cardiff Wharf Roath Dock Road, Northside, Roath Dock, Cardiff CF10 4ED Cefn Mawr Quarry Cadpole Road, Pantybuarth, Mold, Flintshire CH7 5EA Chipping Sodbury Quarry Wickwar Road, Chipping Sodbury, Bristol. Avon BS37 6AY Coldstone Quarry Greenhow Hill, Pateley Bridge, Harrogate, North Yorkshire HG4 3HT Coln Quarry Claydon Pike, Lechlade, Gloucestershire GL7
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset Geology-A Good Rock Guide
    SOMERSET GEOLOGY-A GOOD ROCK GUIDE Hugh Prudden The great unconformity figured by De la Beche WELCOME TO SOMERSET Welcome to green fields, wild flower meadows, farm cider, Cheddar cheese, picturesque villages, wild moorland, peat moors, a spectacular coastline, quiet country lanes…… To which we can add a wealth of geological features. The gorge and caves at Cheddar are well-known. Further east near Frome there are Silurian volcanics, Carboniferous Limestone outcrops, Variscan thrust tectonics, Permo-Triassic conglomerates, sediment-filled fissures, a classic unconformity, Jurassic clays and limestones, Cretaceous Greensand and Chalk topped with Tertiary remnants including sarsen stones-a veritable geological park! Elsewhere in Mendip are reminders of coal and lead mining both in the field and museums. Today the Mendips are a major source of aggregates. The Mesozoic formations curve in an arc through southwest and southeast Somerset creating vales and escarpments that define the landscape and clearly have influenced the patterns of soils, land use and settlement as at Porlock. The church building stones mark the outcrops. Wilder country can be found in the Quantocks, Brendon Hills and Exmoor which are underlain by rocks of Devonian age and within which lie sunken blocks (half-grabens) containing Permo-Triassic sediments. The coastline contains exposures of Devonian sediments and tectonics west of Minehead adjoining the classic exposures of Mesozoic sediments and structural features which extend eastward to the Parrett estuary. The predominance of wave energy from the west and the large tidal range of the Bristol Channel has resulted in rapid cliff erosion and longshore drift to the east where there is a full suite of accretionary landforms: sandy beaches, storm ridges, salt marsh, and sand dunes popular with summer visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Church Registers
    Church Registers This table lists overall holdings - there may be some years missing for the sequences. Ancestry has two listings: up to 1812 the mixed registers; after 1812 the separate registers (1754 for some marriage registers) BT = Bishop's Transcripts; * = books kept offsite & must be requested in advance Non-Conformist Churches Some of these are original and some are transcripts. Please ask if you can't find them. Methodist Churches : Bath Circuit New King St Chapel Baptisms 1792-1819; 1877-1942 Marriages 1860-1921 Walcot Wesleyan Methodist Church Baptisms 1816-1961 Burials 1815-1928 Primitive Methodist Connexion Baptisms 1839-1862 Wesleyan Reform Chapel, Broad Street Baptisms 1851-1867 Methodist Nexus Connexion, Quiet Street Baptisms 1868-1881 Westgate Buildings Primitive Methodist Church Baptisms 1882-1964 Marriages 1908-1963 Note Walcot; Walcot & Freshford; Walcot & St Saviours; Westgate Buildings Larkhall Wesleyan Church, Dafford Street Baptisms 1891-1967 Claremont Primitive Methodist Church Baptisms 1862-1995 Box Hill United Methodist Church Baptisms 1869-1967 Bath Record Office : Archives & Local Studies CR 1 Church Registers Corston Methodist Church Baptisms 1938 Hinton Charterhouse Methodist Church Baptisms 1937-1961 Inglesbatch Methodist Church Baptisms 1879-1855 Note 1879-1855 copied from New King Street register Kingsdown Methodist Church Baptisms 1871-1966 Other Non-Conformist Churches Argyle Independent Chapel Baptisms 1793-1854 Burials 1790-1880 (including Memorial Inscriptions) Unitarian Chapel, Trim Street Baptisms 1719-1789 Burials 1820-1871 Catholic Church Baptisms 1780-1825 Marriages 1781-1824 Burials 1780-1819 Anglican Parishes & Churches Bath Abbey (Ss Peter and Paul) Ancestry Microfiche Transcripts/Indexes Baptisms 1569-1819; 1812-1908 1569-1901 1569-1840 Marriages 1569-1819; 1754-1914 1569-1900 1569-1840 Burials 1569-1819; 1813-1914 1569-1900 1569-1840 (incl.
    [Show full text]
  • Somerset Local Aggregate Assessment
    Somerset Local Aggregate Assessment: incorporating data from 2005-2014 Somerset County Council with Exmoor National Park Authority Minerals and Waste Development Framework This document has been prepared by Somerset County Council in partnership with Exmoor National Park Authority © Somerset County Council Cover photographs: Main image and bottom left image: Whatley Quarry (taken by SCC); middle left image: view of an aggregate working area (taken by SCC); top left image: Halecombe Quarry (taken by SCC). Copies of this document are available from: Somerset County Council County Hall Taunton Somerset TA1 4DY Tel: 0300 123 2224 Email: [email protected] For further details of the Somerset Minerals and Waste Development Framework, and to view and download this and related documents, please visit the Somerset County Council website: www.somerset.gov.uk/mineralsandwaste For further details of the Exmoor National Park Local Plan, please visit http://www.exmoor-nationalpark.gov.uk/planning/planning-policy Document control record Name of document: Somerset Local Aggregate Assessment Draft approved: 19 January 2016 Revised draft approved: 26 January 2016 2nd revision: 09 March 2016 ii Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Land won Aggregates 7 3. Imports and Exports 13 4. Capacity of Aggregate Transportation Infrastructure 16 5. Alternative Aggregates 19 6. Future Aggregate Supply 23 7. Conclusions 28 List of Tables Table 1 Permitted Aggregate Quarries 6 Table 2 Crushed Rock Sales in Somerset 2005-2014 7 Table 3 Somerset Existing Landbank
    [Show full text]
  • February 2021
    Thomas Kenrick Re-pointing Re-Pointing Specialist. Building Conservation. Stone Masonry. 01749 831568 / 07746 2 1 8 0 6 2 www.Repointing Somerset.co.uk 2 This Month The Editor’s Letter Advertisers Index 48 We’re still here. In a good way, with the FTN still going Alhampton Weather 6 Benefice Prayer Pyramid 24 strong, albeit online-only for now, and in a not-so-good Breast Cancer Appeal 27 way with lockdown continuing. But there are reasons British Legion 32 to be cheerful. Census 2021 5 Christmas at Ditcheat 30 The snowdrops are out, even daffodils are starting to Christmas Foodbank 34 appear, days are already more than an hour longer Church Services 24 than when last we published, and birds clearly have COVID vax scam warning 11 procreation on their minds; thankfully Nature is Diary dates 4 magnificently unphased by the latest human Directory 46 predicament and continues to do its stuff. Ditcheat PC Notes 36 Ditcheat PC Support 40 EP Church Rota 39 The Ditcheat Santa visited every house in the village to From the Archives 8 much approval; Mary, Joseph and the donkey attended Gardening 28 the opening of the Crib Service; readers’ contributions Good News ! 22 to the Food Bank and Taps and Toilets fundraiser Kneelers for Ditcheat 14 helped great things happen and two youngsters Litter Heroes 34 shamed the litter louts and cleared up a hideous mess Natural World 12 by the river. (P 34) One Hundred Club 7 Picture from the Past 27 Also, the first of my neighbours have been vaccinated; Pylle News 26 things seems to be heading the right way.
    [Show full text]
  • Glastonbury Companion
    John Cowper Powys’s A Glastonbury Romance: A Reader’s Companion Updated and Expanded Edition W. J. Keith December 2010 . “Reader’s Companions” by Prof. W.J. Keith to other Powys works are available at: http://www.powys-lannion.net/Powys/Keith/Companions.htm Preface The aim of this list is to provide background information that will enrich a reading of Powys’s novel/ romance. It glosses biblical, literary and other allusions, identifies quotations, explains geographical and historical references, and offers any commentary that may throw light on the more complex aspects of the text. Biblical citations are from the Authorized (King James) Version. (When any quotation is involved, the passage is listed under the first word even if it is “a” or “the”.) References are to the first edition of A Glastonbury Romance, but I follow G. Wilson Knight’s admirable example in including the equivalent page-numbers of the 1955 Macdonald edition (which are also those of the 1975 Picador edition), here in square brackets. Cuts were made in the latter edition, mainly in the “Wookey Hole” chapter as a result of the libel action of 1934. References to JCP’s works published in his lifetime are not listed in “Works Cited” but are also to first editions (see the Powys Society’s Checklist) or to reprints reproducing the original pagination, with the following exceptions: Wolf Solent (London: Macdonald, 1961), Weymouth Sands (London: Macdonald, 1963), Maiden Castle (ed. Ian Hughes. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1990), Psychoanalysis and Morality (London: Village Press, 1975), The Owl, the Duck and – Miss Rowe! Miss Rowe! (London: Village Press, 1975), and A Philosophy of Solitude, in which the first English edition is used.
    [Show full text]
  • 638 Far Somersetshire
    638 FAR SOMERSETSHIRE. [ KELLY's! FARMERS continued. Cox Hubert, Burtle, Bridgwater Creighton S.Downhead,Shepton Mallet Corp Alfred, Redlake, North Wootton, Cox Hugh, Chew Stoke, Bristol Crew Arthur, St. Catherine, Bath Shepton Mallet Cox Isaac, Egford, Whatley, Frome Crick Brothers, Great Ash, Winsford, Corp Alfd. West Pennard, Glastonbury Cox James, High Littleton, Bristol Dulverton R.S.O Corp A.Hen,. Lower Godney, Wells Cox Jeffery, Brean, Bridgwater Crick Jn. Devonscombe, Exfrd.Tauntn Corp Arthur Jn. Ham, Shepton Mallet Cox Jesse, Catcott Burtle, Bridgwater Crick Wm. Holtball,Luccombe,Tauntn Corp A. J. Lovington, CastleCary 8.0 Cox John, Lamyatt, Bath Griddle John, Higher Oatley, Canning- Carp Edwin, Witbam Friary, Bath Cox J. R. Oharlton, Radstock, Bath ton, Bridgwater Corp George, Wick, Glastonbury Cox Joseph, Burrington, Bristol Criddle Richard, Loc'king, Weston- Corp Henry, Ham, Wells Cox Joseph, Midsomer Norton, Bath super-Mare Corp Levi, Baltonsborough, Glastonbry Oox Joseph, Westbury, Wells Criddle Richard, Westleigh, Lydeard Gorp T. E. Thrupe, Crosoombe,Wells Cox Joseph James, Portishead S. 0 St. Lawrence, Taunton Corp William, Lamyatt, Bath Cox Mark, Nempnett Thrubwell, Cridge Edwin, Lopen, llminster Corpe John, Sutton, Bath Wrington R.S.O Cridge Thomas, West Hatch, Taunton Corpe Thos. S. Bickenhall, Taunton Cox Mark William, Skinner's hill, East Cridland E.R.S.Milton,Martock R.S.O Corpe William, J.amyatt, Bath Coker, Yeovil Oridland Vile Board, Milton, Martock Cosh Henry, Knapp Hill farm, Leigh- Cox Robert, Combe Hay, Bath R.S.O upon-Mendip, Bath Cox Robert, Frome Crisp John, Allowenshay, Kingstone, Cosh W. Highcroft, Ashwick, Bath Oox Robert, Mount Pleasant, Farm- Ilminster Cossey W.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedtngg. Douittng; Cftutcf), Etc
    .*>() Fifty-ninth Annual Meeting, Mr. II. St. George Gray gave an account, illustrated by lantern slides, of the excavations conducted at Small Down ('amp, near Evcrcreech, in 1903. Full particulars of this work, with illustrations, are given in the Proceedings, Vol. L, pt. ii, pp. 32-49. The third paper was by Mr. F. Bligh Bond, f.R.I.b.a., on " Screen-work in the Churches of North-East Somerset," which was illustrated by an excellent series of lantern slides. This paper is printed in full in Part II, with several illustra- tions. The evening's programme was concluded with a lantern exhibition of photographic studies of Shepton Mallet Church by Dr. F. J. Allen and the Rev. R. L. Jones. Some of these very fine illustrations are reproduced in Dr. Allen's paper on " Shepton Mallet Church " in Part II. Thanks were returned for these communications, and to the Rector of Shepton Mallet for kindly lending and manipulating the lantern. §>econt> proceeDtngg. Heavy and frequent showers considerably detracted from the pleasure of the day's excursions. A party of over 80 members left the George Hotel, at 9.30 a.m., half-an-hour's drive bringing them to Douittng; Cftutcf), etc. The Church was first visited, and after a preliminary in- spection the Rev. F. W. Weaver, f.s.a., gave an interesting paper on its history. He pointed out that they were now in the Glastonbury country, Doulting Church, with others, having been formerly attached to the Abbey of Glastonbury. Such churches were usually very fine, and there wT as no doubt that prior to its restoration Doulting Church was a magnificent edifice.
    [Show full text]