Landscape of Somatic Single-Nucleotide and Copy-Number Mutations in Uterine Serous Carcinoma

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Landscape of Somatic Single-Nucleotide and Copy-Number Mutations in Uterine Serous Carcinoma Landscape of somatic single-nucleotide and copy-number mutations in uterine serous carcinoma Siming Zhaoa, Murim Choia, John D. Overtona, Stefania Belloneb, Dana M. Roqueb, Emiliano Coccob, Federica Guzzob, Diana P. Englishb, Joyce Varugheseb, Sara Gasparrinib, Ileana Bortolomaib, Natalia Buzac, Pei Huic, Maysa Abu-Khalafd, Antonella Ravaggie, Eliana Bignottie, Elisabetta Bandierae, Chiara Romanie, Paola Todeschinie, Renata Tassie, Laura Zanottie, Luisa Carrarae, Sergio Pecorellie, Dan-Arin Silasib, Elena Ratnerb, Masoud Azodib, Peter E. Schwartzb, Thomas J. Rutherfordb, Amy L. Stieglerf, Shrikant Manea, Titus J. Boggonf, Joseph Schlessingerf, Richard P. Liftona,1, and Alessandro D. Santinb aDepartment of Genetics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510; bDepartments of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, cPathology, dInternal Medicine and Oncology, and fPharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510; and eDepartment of Obstetrics, and Gynecology, “Angelo Nocivelli” Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy Contributed by Richard P. Lifton, December 27, 2012 (sent for review December 12, 2012) Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is a biologically aggressive subtype and the recurrence rate after surgery is extremely high (50–80%) of endometrial cancer. We analyzed the mutational landscape of (3–5). This poor prognosis motivates determination of the molec- USC by whole-exome sequencing of 57 cancers, most of which were ular basis of this tumor’s aggressive behavior in hope of developing matched to normal DNA from the same patients. The distribution of new effective treatment modalities. the number of protein-altering somatic mutations revealed that 52 To address these issues, we have sequenced the exomes of USC tumors had fewer than 100 (median 36), whereas 5 had more a large cohort of USC and have identified genes with increased than 3,000 somatic mutations. The mutations in these latter tumors numbers of somatic single-nucleotide and copy-number variants. showed hallmarks of defects in DNA mismatch repair. Among the The results identify cancer genes and define the pathways in- remainder, we found a significantly increased burden of mutation in volved in USC. 14 genes. In addition to well-known cancer genes (i.e., TP53, PIK3CA, GENETICS PPP2R1A, KRAS, FBXW7), there were frequent mutations in CHD4/ Results Mi2b, a member of the NuRD–chromatin-remodeling complex, and Exome Sequencing of USC. Fifty-seven patients with uterine serous TAF1, an element of the core TFIID transcriptional machinery. Addi- carcinoma were studied. Their clinical features are presented in SI tionally, somatic copy-number variation was found to play an im- Appendix, Table S1. Upon surgical removal of tumors, primary cell portant role in USC, with 13 copy-number gains and 12 copy-number lines were prepared (15 tumors) or tumors were frozen (42 losses that occurred more often than expected by chance. In addi- tumors). Exome sequencing was performed on all tumors; for 34 of tion to loss of TP53, we found frequent deletion of a small segment these, DNA samples from normal tissue were available and se- of chromosome 19 containing MBD3, also a member of the NuRD– quenced. Exome sequencing was performed using the NimbleGen/ chromatin-modification complex, and frequent amplification of Roche capture reagent followed by 74 base paired-end DNA se- chromosome segments containing PIK3CA, ERBB2 (an upstream ac- quencing on the Illumina HiSeq platform (6). By design, tumor tivator of PIK3CA), and CCNE1 (a target of FBXW7-mediated ubiq- samples were sequenced to greater depth of coverage to permit uitination). These findings identify frequent mutation of DNA detection of somatic mutations in tumors despite admixture of damage, chromatin remodeling, cell cycle, and cell proliferation normal and tumor cells in these samples. For tumors and normal pathways in USC and suggest potential targets for treatment of this DNA, each targeted base was sequenced by a mean of 187 and 100 lethal variant of endometrial cancer. independent reads, respectively (SI Appendix, Table S2). Of all targeted bases in tumors, 94.5% were read by 20 or more in- endometrial carcinoma | uterine serous papillary cancer | cancer genomics dependent reads; mean per-base per read error rates were 0.42% for normal DNA and 0.48% for tumor DNA. Segments of loss of ndometrial cancer is the most prevalent gynecologic tumor in heterozygosity (LOH) were called from the difference in B-allele Ewomen, with an annual incidence of 47,130 new cases and frequency between tumor-normal pairs (SI Appendix,Fig.S1), 8,010 deaths in 2012 in the United States (1). On the basis of allowing estimates of tumor purity, which were above 60% for clinical and histopathological features, endometrial cancer is frozen tumors and higher for primary cell lines. Somatic mutations fi fi classified into type I and type II disease groups (2). Type I tumors, were identi ed by nding variant reads in tumors that were sig- fi Materials and which constitute the majority of cases, are generally diagnosed at ni cantly more frequent than expected by chance ( Methods fi an early stage, are low grade and endometrioid in histology, are ). At the coverage levels studied, there was no signi cant associated with a history of hyperestrogenism, and typically have relationship between tumor purity and the number of somatic fi a good prognosis. In contrast, type II cancers are poorly differ- variants detected, consistent with suf cient depth of coverage entiated, often with serous papillary [uterine serous carcinoma having been achieved to identify the vast majority of somatic (USC)] or clear cell histology. Although these tumors account for mutations. Variants in genes implicated in the pathogenesis of a minority of endometrial cancers, the majority of relapses and deaths occur in this group of patients (2). Among type II cancers, USC represents the most biologically Author contributions: J.S., R.P.L., and A.D.S. designed research; J.D.O., S.B., D.M.R., E.C., F.G., S.G., I.B., N.B., P.H., A.R., E. Bignotti, E. Bandiera, C.R., P.T., R.T., L.Z., L.C., A.L.S., S.M., aggressive subtype (3, 4). Classically, the neoplastic epithelium is and T.J.B. performed research; D.P.E., J.V., M.A.-K., S.P., D.-A.S., E.R., M.A., P.E.S., and characterized by serous differentiation with psammoma bodies and T.J.R. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; S.Z., M.C., and R.P.L. analyzed data; and a predominantly papillary architecture (3). Pleomorphic cytology S.Z., A.L.S., T.J.B., J.S., R.P.L., and A.D.S. wrote the paper. with nuclear atypia, prominent nucleoli, a vescicular chromatin The authors declare no conflict of interest. pattern, and high mitotic activity are seen. Clinically, USC has Freely available online through the PNAS open access option. a propensity for early intra-abdominal and lymphatic spread (3) 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. – and is more commonly diagnosed in women of African ancestry (3 This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. 5). The overall 5-y survival of USC is only 30 ± 9% for all stages, 1073/pnas.1222577110/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1222577110 PNAS Early Edition | 1of6 Downloaded by guest on September 23, 2021 USC were verified by direct Sanger sequencing and were found to mutated tumors showed a paucity of T:A > A:T or C:G > A:T be expressed in all available USC cell lines. transversions (SI Appendix,Fig.S2) (9). Examination of the POLE and MMR genes showed no germ-line mutations; however, so- Tumors with Hypermutator Phenotype. The number of protein-al- matic mutations in these genes were highly prevalent in these tering somatic mutations per tumor markedly deviated from tumors (mean of 4 per tumor, including 4 premature termination a normal distribution (Fig. 1A). In the discovery set of 34 USC with mutations for MMR genes and a mean of 4.5 per tumor for POLE) − matched normal DNA, 30 tumors had fewer than 100 protein- and more frequent than expected by chance (P = 2.23 × 10 3)(SI altering somatic mutations (median 36), whereas 4 had more than Appendix, Table S3). Among the cancers without matched normal 3,000 somatic mutations each. Only one of these tumors was from DNA, one showed a similarly high prevalence of rare protein- a cell line (with limited propagation), and none came from patients altering variants (>3,000) and a skewed distribution of rare pro- who had received chemotherapy before sample acquisition. These tein-altering transversions. Thus, 9% of USC in this cohort have tumors with high mutation burden were also notable for having no a hypermutator phenotype. Because of the skewing effect of the LOH segments or copy-number variants (CNVs), a feature found large number of mutations in these tumors, they were not included in only five other tumors. These features suggest a hypermutator in subsequent analyses of mutation burden. phenotype due to deficiency of mismatch repair (MMR) or poly- e POLE Analysis of Single-Nucleotide Variants. Among somatic mutations in merase ( ) genes (7, 8). Consistent with this, these hyper- the 30 remaining matched tumors, we identified recurrences of somatic mutations at the same positions. Accounting for the rate of − protein-altering somatic mutations in these tumors (1.1 × 10 6)and the size of the exome, the likelihood of seeing the mutation twice by − chance at any position among these tumors is <10 3.Weidentified six genes with recurrent somatic mutations (Table 1). These in- cluded well-established activating mutations in PIK3CA (10), the catalytic subunit of phosphoinositide-3 kinase (five tumors); the well-established G12V mutation in KRAS (three tumors) (11); and a mutation at R465 in FBXW7 in four tumors (12).
Recommended publications
  • Neutralizing Gatad2a-Chd4-Mbd3 Axis Within the Nurd Complex
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/192781; this version posted February 9, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Neutralizing Gatad2a-Chd4-Mbd3 Axis 2 within the NuRD Complex Facilitates 3 Deterministic Induction of Naïve Pluripotency 4 1* 1* 1 1,2 1 5 Nofar Mor , Yoach Rais , Shani Peles , Daoud Sheban , Alejandro Aguilera-Castrejon , 1 3 1 1 1 6 Asaf Zviran , Dalia Elinger , Sergey Viukov , Shay Geula , Vladislav Krupalnik , Mirie 1 4,5 1 1 1 1 7 Zerbib , Elad Chomsky , Lior Lasman , Tom Shani , Jonathan Bayerl , Ohad Gafni , 6 7,8 9 10 10 8 Suhair Hanna , Jason D. Buenrostro , Tzachi Hagai , Hagit Masika , Yehudit Bergman , 11,12 13 3 1 2 9 William J. Greenleaf , Miguel A. Esteban , Yishai Levin , Rada Massarwa , Yifat Merbl , 1#@ 1#@% 10 Noa Novershtern and Jacob H. Hanna . 1 11 The Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel. 2 12 The Department of Immunology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel. 13 3 The Nancy and Stephen Grand Israel National Center for Personalized Medicine (INCPM), 14 Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel. 15 4 Department of Biological Regulation, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel 16 5 Department of Computer Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel 17 6 Department of Pediatrics and the Pediatric Immunology Unit, Rambam Health Care Campus & 18 Bruce
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Unique Protein Interaction Networks Define the Chromatin Remodeling
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.27.428018; this version posted January 28, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Unique Protein Interaction Networks Define The Chromatin Remodeling Module of The NuRD Complex Mehdi Sharifi Tabar1,2, Caroline Giardina1, Yue Julie Feng1, Habib Francis1, Hakimeh Moghaddas Sani3, Jason K. K. Low3, Joel P. Mackay3, Charles G. Bailey1,2,4, John E.J. Rasko1,2,5,6 1Gene and Stem Cell Therapy Program Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia 2Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia 3School of Life & Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia 4Cancer and Gene Regulation Laboratory Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia 5Cell and Molecular Therapies, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia 6Corresponding author 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.27.428018; this version posted January 28, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract The combination of four proteins and their paralogues including MBD2/3, GATAD2A/B, CDK2AP1, and CHD3/4/5, which we refer to as the MGCC module, form the chromatin remodeling module of the Nucleosome Remodeling and Deacetylase (NuRD) complex, a gene repressor complex. Specific paralogues of the MGCC subunits such as MBD2 and CHD4 are amongst the key repressors of adult-stage fetal globin and provide important targets for molecular therapies in beta (β)-thalassemia.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Binding Selectivity of Mecp2 Due to a Requirement for A/T Sequences Adjacent to Methyl-Cpg
    Molecular Cell, Vol. 19, 667–678, September 2, 2005, Copyright ©2005 by Elsevier Inc. DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.07.021 DNA Binding Selectivity of MeCP2 Due to a Requirement for A/T Sequences Adjacent to Methyl-CpG Robert J. Klose, Shireen A. Sarraf, 2004). Mammalian MBD3 does not bind specifically to Lars Schmiedeberg, Suzanne M. McDermott, methylated DNA, and MBD4 is a DNA repair protein Irina Stancheva,* and Adrian P. Bird* (Hendrich et al., 1999; Millar et al., 2002), although re- Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology cent evidence suggests that MBD4 may also act as a Michael Swann Building transcriptional repressor (Kondo et al., 2005). University of Edinburgh The biomedical relevance of MBD proteins became Mayfield Road apparent with the discovery that the human neurode- Edinburgh EH9 3JR velopmental disorder Rett syndrome is caused by mu- United Kingdom tations in the MECP2 gene (Amir et al., 1999). Muta- tional profiling of Rett syndrome patients identified a significant fraction of point mutations that inactivated Summary the MBD itself (Kriaucionis and Bird, 2003). The DNA and protein features that determine the specificity of DNA methylation is interpreted by a family of methyl- the MBD for methyl-CpG sites have been examined CpG binding domain (MBD) proteins that repress (Free et al., 2001; Meehan et al., 1992; Nan et al., 1993; transcription through recruitment of corepressors Yusufzai and Wolffe, 2000), and the three-dimensional that modify chromatin. To compare in vivo binding of structure of the domain, both alone (Ohki et al., 1999; MeCP2 and MBD2, we analyzed immunoprecipitated Wakefield et al., 1999) and in complex with methylated chromatin from primary human cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of DNA Methyl-Cpg-Binding Protein Mecp2 in Rett Syndrome Pathobiology and Mechanism of Disease
    biomolecules Review Role of DNA Methyl-CpG-Binding Protein MeCP2 in Rett Syndrome Pathobiology and Mechanism of Disease Shervin Pejhan † and Mojgan Rastegar * Regenerative Medicine Program, and Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0J9, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-(204)-272-3108; Fax: +1-(204)-789-3900 † Current Address: Neuropathology Program, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 5C, Canada. Abstract: Rett Syndrome (RTT) is a severe, rare, and progressive developmental disorder with patients displaying neurological regression and autism spectrum features. The affected individuals are primarily young females, and more than 95% of patients carry de novo mutation(s) in the Methyl- CpG-Binding Protein 2 (MECP2) gene. While the majority of RTT patients have MECP2 mutations (classical RTT), a small fraction of the patients (atypical RTT) may carry genetic mutations in other genes such as the cyclin-dependent kinase-like 5 (CDKL5) and FOXG1. Due to the neurological basis of RTT symptoms, MeCP2 function was originally studied in nerve cells (neurons). However, later research highlighted its importance in other cell types of the brain including glia. In this regard, scientists benefitted from modeling the disease using many different cellular systems and transgenic mice with loss- or gain-of-function mutations. Additionally, limited research in human postmortem brain tissues provided invaluable findings in RTT pathobiology and disease mechanism. MeCP2 expression in the brain is tightly regulated, and its altered expression leads to abnormal brain function, implicating MeCP2 in some cases of autism spectrum disorders.
    [Show full text]
  • Function and Regulation of Aurora/Ipl1p Kinase Family in Cell Division
    Cell Research (2003); 13(2):69-81 http://www.cell-research.com Function and regulation of Aurora/Ipl1p kinase family in cell division 1 1 1 1,2, YU WEN KE , ZHEN DOU , JIE ZHANG , XUE BIAO YAO * 1 Laboratory for Cell Dynamics, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China 2 Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA ABSTRACT During mitosis, the parent cell distributes its genetic materials equally into two daughter cells through chromosome segregation, a complex movements orchestrated by mitotic kinases and its effector proteins. Faithful chromosome segregation and cytokinesis ensure that each daughter cell receives a full copy of genetic materials of parent cell. Defects in these processes can lead to aneuploidy or polyploidy. Aurora/Ipl1p family, a class of conserved serine/threonine kinases, plays key roles in chromosome segregation and cytokinesis. This article highlights the function and regulation of Aurora/Ipl1p family in mitosis and provides potential links between aberrant regulation of Aurora/Ipl1p kinases and pathogenesis of human cancer. Key words: Aurora (Ipl1p), mitosis, and cancer. INTRODUCTION among species, the regulatory machinery is conserved from yeast to human. One of most conserved regu- Cell is a fundamental unit of life that is relayed lators is serine/theronine protein kinase superfam- via mitosis. The essence of mitosis is to segregate ily that alters the function of its effectors via protein parental genomes encoded in sister chromatides into phosphorylation. Entry into mitosis is driven by pro- two daughter cells, such that each of them inherits tein kinases while initiation of exit from mitosis is one complete copy of genome.
    [Show full text]
  • (HDAC1), but Not HDAC2, Controls Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation
    Histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1), but not HDAC2, controls embryonic stem cell differentiation Oliver M. Dovey, Charles T. Foster, and Shaun M. Cowley1 Department of Biochemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 9HN, United Kingdom Edited* by Robert N. Eisenman, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, and approved March 30, 2010 (received for review January 13, 2010) Histone deacetylases (HDAC) 1 and 2 are highly similar enzymes that complexes, including Sin3A (20), SDS3 (21), MBD3 (22), and help regulate chromatin structure as the core catalytic components LSD1 (23, 24). Germ-line deletion of HDAC1 results in early of corepressor complexes. Although tissue-specific deletion of embryonic lethality around embryonic day (e)10.5, although ab- HDAC1 and HDAC2 has demonstrated functional redundancy, errant development occurs as early as e7.5. In contrast to these germ-line deletion of HDAC1 in the mouse causes early embryonic early embryonic phenotypes, constitutive HDAC2 knockout mice lethality, whereas HDAC2 does not. To address the unique re- survive embryogenesis and either die shortly after birth in one quirement for HDAC1 in early embryogenesis we have generated model (19) or survive to adulthood in others (25–27), albeit at conditional knockout embryonic stem (ES) cells in which HDAC1 or reduced Mendelian frequencies. In a number of cell types, de- HDAC2 genes can be inactivated. Deletion of HDAC1, but not letion of both HDAC1 and HDAC2 is required to generate HDAC2, causes a significant reduction in the HDAC activity of Sin3A, a phenotype (14, 19, 28). This result suggests that the activity of NuRD, and CoREST corepressor complexes.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-MBD4 Antibody Produced in Rabbit (M9817)
    Anti-MBD4 Developed in Rabbit Affinity Isolated Antibody Product Number M 9817 Product Description suggests that it plays a role in suppressing mutability Anti-MBD4 is developed in rabbit using as immunogen a and tumorigenesis.12 synthetic peptide corresponding to amino acids 541-554 Antibodies reacting specifically with MBD4 may be used of mouse MBD4, conjugated to KLH via an N- terminal for studying chromatin remodeling effects on gene added cysteine residue. The sequence is conserved in expression. human. The antibody is affinity-purified using the immunizing peptide immobilized on agarose. Reagent Anti-MBD4 is supplied as a solution in 0.01 M phosphate Anti-MBD4 recognizes mouse MBD4 by immunoblotting buffered saline, pH 7.4, containing 1% bovine serum (approx. 65 kDa). Staining of the MBD4 band in albumin (BSA) and 15 mM sodium azide. immunoblotting is specifically inhibited by the immunizing peptide. Antibody concentration: Approx. 1.0 mg/ml Chromatin, the physiological packaging structure of Precautions and Disclaimer histone proteins and DNA, is a key element in the Due to the sodium azide content, a material safety data regulation of gene expression. Histones are subjected sheet (MSDS) for this product has been sent to the to post-translational modifications such as acetylation, attention of the safety officer of your institution. Consult phosphorylation, and methylation that play a major role the MSDS for information regarding hazards and safe in the regulation of transcription.1, 2 DNA methylation is handling practices. the major modification of eukaryotic genomes, which occurs at the fifth position of cytosine in CpG dinucleo- Storage/Stability tide sequences.3, 4 DNA methylation is associated with For continuous use, store at 2-8 °C for up to one month.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mecp1 Complex Represses Transcription Through Preferential Binding, Remodeling, and Deacetylating Methylated Nucleosomes
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 26, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press RESEARCH COMMUNICATION highly similar (65% identical) to the candidate metasta- The MeCP1 complex represses sis-associated protein MTA1 (Toh et al. 1994; Zhang et transcription through al. 1999). Biochemical characterization of MTA2 indi- preferential binding, cates that it plays an important role in modulating the histone deacetylase activity of the NuRD complex remodeling, and deacetylating (Zhang et al. 1999). MBD3 is a methyl-CpG-binding do- methylated nucleosomes main-containing protein, similar to MBD2 (Hendrich and Bird 1998). Qin Feng and Yi Zhang1 The identification of the methyl-CpG-binding do- main-containing protein MBD3 in the NuRD/Mi2 com- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Lineberger plex suggests that this complex may be recruited to Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina methylated DNA for transcriptional silencing. There- at Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7295, USA fore, considerable efforts have been devoted to establish- Histone deacetylation plays an important role in meth- ing a link between the NuRD/Mi-2 complex and DNA ylated DNA silencing. Recent studies indicated that the methylation (Wade et al. 1999; Zhang et al. 1999). Con- methyl-CpG-binding protein, MBD2, is a component of sistent with the finding that the bulk of mammalian the MeCP1 histone deacetylase complex. Interestingly, MBD3 is not localized to methylated DNA foci in vivo MBD2 is able to recruit the nucleosome remodeling and (Hendrich and Bird 1998), mammalian MBD3, either by histone deacetylase, NuRD, to methylated DNA in vitro. itself or in association with NuRD, does not show affin- To understand the relationship between the MeCP1 ity binding to methylated DNA in gel shift assays (Hen- complex and the NuRD complex, we purified the MeCP1 drich and Bird 1998; Zhang et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Mecp2 Monoclonal Antibody
    TECHNICAL DATASHEET MeCP2 monoclonal antibody Other name: AUTSX3, MRX16, MRX79, MRXS13, MRXSL, PPMX, RTS, RTT Cat. No. C15200225 Specificity: Human, mouse: positive Type: Monoclonal Other species: not tested Source: Mouse Purity: Affinity purified monoclonal antibody in PBS. Does not Lot #: 001 contain any preservative. Size: 50 µg/50 µl Storage: Store at -20°C; for long storage, store at -80°C. Concentration: 1 µg/µl Avoid multiple freeze-thaw cycles Precautions: This product is for research use only. Not for use in diagnostic or therapeutic procedures Description: Monoclonal antibody raised in mouse against MeCP2 (Methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 2), using a recombinant protein. Applications Suggested dilution Results Western blotting 1:1,000 Fig 1 Immunofluorescence 1:400 Fig 2 Target description MeCP2 (UniProt/Swiss-Prot entry P51608) is a chromosomal protein with abundant binding sites in the chromatin. It belongs to the family of methyl CpG binding proteins which also comprises MBD1, MBD2, MBD3 and MBD4. MeCP2 can bind specifically to methylated promoters, thereby repressing transcription. This transcriptional repression is mediated through interaction with histone deacetylase and the corepressor SIN3A. MeCP2 also is essential for development. Mutations in MeCP2 are the cause of several types of mental retardation including Rett syndrome, a progressive neurological disorder that causes mental retardation in females and mental retardation syndromic X-linked type 13, and may also be involved in Angelman syndrome and susceptibility to some types of autism. 1 Results Figure 1. Western blot analysis using the Diagenode monoclonal antibody directed against MeCP2 Whole cell extracts from HeLa (lane 1) or MEF (lane 2) cells were analysed by Western blot using the Diagenode antibody against MeCP2 (Cat.
    [Show full text]
  • GATAD2B-Associated Neurodevelopmental Disorder (GAND): Clinical and Molecular Insights Into a Nurd-Related Disorder
    ARTICLE © American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics GATAD2B-associated neurodevelopmental disorder (GAND): clinical and molecular insights into a NuRD-related disorder Christine Shieh, MD1, Natasha Jones, BS2, Brigitte Vanle, PhD3,4, Margaret Au, MBE, MS5, Alden Y. Huang, PhD6, Ana P. G. Silva, PhD2, Hane Lee, PhD7, Emilie D. Douine, MS8, Maria G. Otero, PhD9, Andrew Choi, BS9, Katheryn Grand, GC10, Ingrid P. Taff, MD11, Mauricio R. Delgado, MD12, M. J. Hajianpour, MD-PhD13, Andrea Seeley, MD14, Luis Rohena, MD15,16, Hilary Vernon, MD-PhD17, Karen W. Gripp, MD18, Samantha A. Vergano, MD19, Sonal Mahida, MGC20, Sakkubai Naidu, MD21,22, Ana Berta Sousa, MD23, Karen E. Wain, MS LGC24, Thomas D. Challman, MD24, Geoffrey Beek, MS, GC25, Donald Basel, MD26, Judith Ranells, MD27, Rosemarie Smith, MD28, Roman Yusupov, MD29, Mary-Louise Freckmann, MD30, Lisa Ohden, GC31, Laura Davis-Keppen, MD32, David Chitayat, MD33,34, James J. Dowling, MD-PhD35, Richard Finkel, MD36, Andrew Dauber, MD37, Rebecca Spillmann, MS CGC38, Loren D. M. Pena, MD-PhD39,40, The Undiagnosed Diseases Network, Kay Metcalfe, MD41, Miranda Splitt, MD42, Katherine Lachlan, MD43,44, Shane A. McKee, MD45, Jane Hurst, MD46, David R. Fitzpatrick, MD47, Jenny E. V. Morton, MBChB FRCP48,49,50, Helen Cox, MD48,49,50, Sunita Venkateswaran, MD51, Juan I. Young, PhD52, Eric D. Marsh, MD-PhD53, Stanley F. Nelson, MD8, Julian A. Martinez, MD-PhD54, John M. GrahamJr, MD, ScD55, Usha Kini, MD56, Joel P. Mackay, PhD2 and Tyler Mark Pierson, MD-PhD 10,57,58 Purpose: Determination of genotypic/phenotypic features of disrupted GATAD2B interactions with its NuRD complex binding GATAD2B-associated neurodevelopmental disorder (GAND).
    [Show full text]
  • Solution Structure of the Methyl-Cpg Binding Domain of Human MBD1 in Complex with Methylated DNA
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Cell, Vol. 105, 487±497, May 18, 2001, Copyright 2001 by Cell Press Solution Structure of the Methyl-CpG Binding Domain of Human MBD1 in Complex with Methylated DNA Izuru Ohki,1,2 Nobuya Shimotake,1 Naoyuki Fujita,3 tumor suppressor genes become aberrantly hypermeth- Jun-Goo Jee,1 Takahisa Ikegami,1 ylated in cancer cells (Sutcliffe et al., 1994; Baylin et al., Mitsuyoshi Nakao,2 and Masahiro Shirakawa1,2,4 1998; Costello et al., 2000), while DNA hypomethylation 1 Graduate School of Biological Sciences has been shown to lead to elevated mutational rates Nara Institute of Science and Technology and chromosomal abnormalities, thus associating it with 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma an early step in carcinogenesis (Chen et al., 1998). These Nara 630-0101 observations suggest that DNA methylation also func- Japan tions as a genome integrity system. In addition, DNA 2 Graduate School of Integrated Science methylation has been linked to several human neurode- Yokohama City University velopmental syndromes, such as Rett, fragile X, and 1-7-29 Suehiro, Tsurumi ICF syndromes, which result from mutations in factors Yokohama, Kanagawa 230-0045 involved in DNA methylation (Robertson and Wolffe, Japan 2000). 3 Department of Tumor Genetics and Biology In many cases, sites of DNA methylation are recog- Kumamoto University School of Medicine nized by a family of protein factors that contain con- 2-2-1 Honjo served methyl-CpG binding domains (MBDs). To date, Kumamoto 860-0811 five family members have been characterized in mam- Japan mals and Xenopus laevis: MeCP2, MBD1, MBD2, MBD3, and MBD4 (Figure 1A) (Hendrich and Bird, 1998; Wade et al., 1999; Ballestar and Wolffe, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Closely Related Proteins MBD2 and MBD3 Play Distinctive but Interacting Roles in Mouse Development
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 25, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Closely related proteins MBD2 and MBD3 play distinctive but interacting roles in mouse development Brian Hendrich,1,4 Jacqueline Guy,1 Bernard Ramsahoye,2 Valerie A. Wilson,3 and Adrian Bird1 1Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell Biology, Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, The University of Edinburgh, Michael Swann Building, The King’s Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, Scotland; 2Department of Haematology, John Hughes Bennett Laboratory, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Scotland; 3Centre for Genome Research, The University of Edinburgh, The King’s Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ, Scotland MBD2 and MBD3 are closely related proteins with consensus methyl-CpG binding domains. MBD2 is a transcriptional repressor that specifically binds to methylated DNA and is a component of the MeCP1 protein complex. In contrast, MBD3 fails to bind methylated DNA in murine cells, and is a component of the Mi-2/NuRD corepressor complex. We show by gene targeting that the two proteins are not functionally redundant in mice, as Mbd3(−/−) mice die during early embryogenesis, whereas Mbd2(−/−) mice are viable and fertile. Maternal behavior of Mbd2(−/−) mice is however defective and, at the molecular level, Mbd2(−/−) mice lack a component of MeCP1. Mbd2-mutant cells fail to fully silence transcription from exogenous methylated templates, but inappropriate activation of endogenous imprinted genes or retroviral sequences was not detected. Despite their differences, Mbd3 and Mbd2 interact genetically suggesting a functional relationship. Genetic and biochemical data together favor the view that MBD3 is a key component of the Mi-2/NuRD corepressor complex, whereas MBD2 may be one of several factors that can recruit this complex to DNA.
    [Show full text]