Electoral Area Directors Committee Meeting Agenda May 14, 2012; 10:30 AM - 2:00 PM SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC
Item Item of Business and Page # Page
1. Call to Order
2. Approval of Agenda
3. New Business 3.1. April 2012 Monthly Building Report 3-9 For information
3.2. Select Funds Report 10-14
3.3. Information Report - House Numbering Signs 15-17
3.4. Information Report - McGillivray Creek Information 18-34
THAT the Electoral Area Directors Committee receive the information related to McGillivray Creek and Tribal Parks as background to the presentation by Mr. Bill Pekonen and Mr. Don McGee 3.5. Request for Decision - Exempt the Gun Lake Fire Protection 35-37 Society Storage Building from ‘Post-Disaster Building’ Designation
THAT the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board exempt the proposed Gun Lake Fire Protection Society storage building for a fire truck and related fire-fighting equipment from ‘post-disaster building’ designation. 3.6. Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Plan - Area C 38-67
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT the Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan - Area C (AAP) be adopted as Board policy. 3.7. CAO Verbal Update
4. Correspondence Requesting Action
Page 1 of 82 Item Item of Business and Page # Page
4. Correspondence Requesting Action 4.1. Pemberton & District Chamber of Commerce - Grant Request for 68-70 Pemberton Visitor's Centre
4.2. Lillooet Secondary School - Dry Grad Celebration 71-72
4.3. Lil'wat May Day Rodeo 73
4.4. Bridge River Valley Economic Development Society (BRVEDS) - 74-76 Request for Funding for the Dissolution of Bralorne-Bridge River Valley Community Association (BBRVCA)
5. Correspondence for Information 5.1. 4th Annual Longboard Event, Brittannia Beach 77
6. Confirmation and Receipt of Minutes 6.1. Electoral Area Directors Committee Draft Meeting Minutes of April 78-82 10, 2012 For approval as distributed or corrected.
7. Business Arising from the Minutes
8. Decision on Late Business THAT the late items be considered at this meeting (requires 2/3 majority vote)
9. Late Business
10. Electoral Area Directors Closed Meeting Resolution to Close the Meeting to the Public
THAT the Committee close the meeting to the public under the authority of Section 90(1)(j) of the Community Charter. 11. Delegations 11.1. Bill Pekonen & Don McGee re: McGillivray Trail and Tribal Parks
12. Adjournment
Page 2 of 82 April 2012 Monthly Building Report For information
To: Electoral Area Directors Committee
From: Arlene McClean, Sr. Building Clerk
Date: May 14, 2012
Re: Monthly Report for April 2012 REPORT
Courses/Meetings
The Building Inspector attended the Lower Mainland Technical Committee meeting in April.
Stop Work Orders
There were no Stop Work Orders posted in the month of April.
General
There were 16 applications received and 10 permits issued in the month of April. Please see attached Statistics report for details.
Respectfully submitted,
Arlene McClean Sr. Building Clerk
K:\BUILDING DEPARTMENT\reports\2012\April Bldg Report\04 April mf report.doc
Page 3 of 82 April 2012 Monthly Building Report For information
Building Department Monthly Report
Building Statistics Summary For April 2012
Type of Permit No. Permit Value Permit Fee
Residence Mobile/Modular Home Duplex Multi Family Commercial Building Industrial Building Institutional Building Garages/Carports 1 $ 53,760.00 $ 438.65 Sheds/Workshops Alt./Add to Dwelling Alt./Add to Commercial Alt./Add to Industrial Alt./Add to Institutional Wood Stoves/Fireplace Farm Buildings & Misc. Demolition Permits 9 $ 90,000.00 $ 60.00 Retaining Wall Moving Permit -All Bldgs Ex.Fm
TOTAL 10 $ 143,760.00 $ 498.65
Page 4 of 82 April 2012 Monthly Building Report For information
Issued Permit Totals
April-12 Permit Totals to Date
Permit Value Permit Fees # Permit Value Permit Fees # 2012 $ 143,760.00 $ 498.65 10 $ 1,454,610.00 $ 13,173.64 21 2011 $ 375,000.00 $ 3,533.00 1 $ 6,962,200.00* $ 66,544.84 26 2010 $ 454,610.00 $ 4,871.36 4 $ 1,634,181.00 $ 16,496.70 15 2009 $ 569,860.00 $ 5,926.17 5 $ 1,735,860.00 $ 17,346.16 16 2008 $ 456,440.00 $ 4,548.42 6 $ 2,685,410.00 $ 26,443.86 23 2007 $ 2,435,221.00 $ 24,211.48 11 $ 3,807,761.00 $ 37,712.03 24 2006 $ 1,673,330.00 $ 16,970.00 11 $ 3,875,135.00 $ 38,316.08 35 2005 $ 1,469,210.00 $ 14,312.93 14 $ 1,743,228.00 $ 15,623.43 26 2004 $ 1,423,650.00 $ 13,640.70 9 $ 3,997,175.00 $ 35,537.80 35 2003 $ 799,300.00 $ 7,387.16 6 $ 1,946,696.00 $ 18,715.58 21 2002 $ 1,187,520.00 $ 8,366.50 8 $ 1,526,985.00 $ 10,213.30 16
* 2011 March - BC Hydro Seton Project - 10 (4 Plex) Permits issued
Revenue Generated Renewed BP Reactivated BP Total Renewed BP Reactivated BP from ($210.00 ) ($500.00) Monthly ($210.00 ) ($500.00) Total YTD
April 2012 $ 840.00 $ -500.00** $ 840.00 $ 1,260.00 $ - $ 1,260.00
** Reimbursed Reactivated Fee - Owner sold property/will not complete permit Total Monthly Total YTD Applications BP App. Applications Received Fee Received BP App. Fee
Application Fee - Area A 3 $ 300.00 6 $ 600.00 Application Fee - Area B 8 $ 800.00 9 $ 900.00 Application Fee - Area C 2 $ 200.00 8 $ 800.00 Application Fee - Area D 3 $ 300.00 10 $ 1,000.00
Total Applications & Fees 16 $ 1,600.00 33 $ 3,300.00
Total BP Issued, Renewed/Reactivated & App. Fees Collected to date $ 17,733.64
Page 5 of 82 April 2012 Monthly Building Report For information
Year to Date Statistics
Year to Date Issued Permits Building Statistics January 1, 2012 - April 30, 2012
Yearly Number of Issued Permits AREA A 1 AREA B 9 AREA D AREA A AREA C 4 33% 5% AREA D 7 AREA A AREA B TOTAL: 21 AREA C AREA D AREA B AREA C 43% 19%
Yearly Issued Permit Values AREA A $ 2,000.00 AREA B $ 193,920.00 AREA A AREA B AREA C $ 95,760.00 0% 13% AREA D $ 1,162,930.00 AREA A AREA C AREA B TOTAL: $ 1,454,610.00 7% AREA C AREA D AREA D 80%
Yearly Issued Permit Fees AREA A $ 20.00 AREA B $ 1,137.00 AREA A AREA B AREA C $ 677.90 0% 9% AREA D $ 11,338.74 AREA A AREA C TOTAL: $ 13,173.64 5% AREA B AREA C
AREA D AREA D 86%
Page 6 of 82 April 2012 Monthly Building Report For information
Monthly Statistics
Monthly Issued Permits Building Statistics for April 2012
AREA A 0 Monthly Number of Issued Permits AREA B 8 AREA A AREA D AREA C 2 0% AREA C 0% AREA D 0 20%
AREA A TOTAL: 10 AREA B AREA C AREA D
AREA B 80%
AREA A $ - Monthly Issued Permit Values AREA B $ 80,000.00 AREA A AREA D AREA C $ 63,760.00 0% AREA D $ - 0% AREA A TOTAL: $143,760.00 AREA B AREA C
AREA D AREA C 44% AREA B 56%
Monthly Issued Permit Fees AREA A $ - AREA B $ 40.00 AREA A AREA D AREA B 0% 0% 8% AREA C $ 458.65 AREA A AREA D $ - AREA B AREA C TOTAL: $ 498.65 AREA D
AREA C 92%
Page 7 of 82 April 2012 Monthly Building Report For information
Building Permit Application Summary Application # Legal Area Construction Date Details Lot 65, DL1897, Plan BCP20004, NWD - 1726 Block771 Upper 9, DL Crescent, 1034, Plan Briatannia 4352, NWD Beach - D Wood Stove 06/02/12 Issued 2155 Hensman Road, Upper Squamish 1727 Valley D Change of Use 09/02/12 Issued Common Property, District Lot 2247, Grp 1, Plan BCS3916 - Riverside Drive, 1728 Wedge Woods (Whistler) C Retaining Walls 02/09/12 Issued SL 40, DLs 2668 & 5589, Splan VR559, 1729 NWD - Lot 40 Black Tusk D Fireplace 13/02/12 Issued Lot 22, DL 2201, Plan 24455, LLD - 9692 1730 Devine St., D'Arcy C Renovation 15/02/12 awaiting Information
1731 DL 657, LLD - Slot Creek, West Pavilion B Addition to SFD 16/02/12 Issued That Part of DL 201 Shown Coloured Red on Plan D.D. 18451F, LLD - Pemberton 1732 Meadows Road C Single Family Dwelling 23/02/12 awaiting Information Parcel A (Being a consolidation of Lots 11, 12 & 13 See LB391164) DL 2372, 1733 Plan 5847, LLD - 5450 Pioneer Road, A Single Family Dwelling 29/02/12 awaiting Information Strata Lot 69, DL's 2668 & 5589, Strata Plan VR. 559, NWD - 69 Black Tusk Dr., 1734 Whistler (Pinecrest Estates) D Renovation 06/03/12 Issued Lot 1, DL 1253, Plan 16759, LLD - 2789 1735 Gates Creek Road, Birken C Garage 16/03/12 Issued DL 4931, Except Plans B3568, B5258, 35969 & KAP67637, LLD - 8400 1736 Tyaughton Lake Road, Tyaughton Lake A Hot Tub & Deck 19/03/12 awaiting Information Lot 71, DL 1897, Grp 1, Plan BCP20004, 1737 NWD - 754 Britannia Way D Single Family Dwelling 26/03/12 awaiting Information Lot 2, DL 211, Plan 20878, LLD - 1710 1738 Hgwy 99 C Single Family Dwelling 28/03/12 awaiting Information Lot 1, DL 7325, Plan 13919, LLD - 645 S 1739 Gun Lake Rd. A Shed 02/04/12 awaiting Information Lot A, DL 1171, Plan 11681, LLD - 9183 Birken House 1740 Pemberton Portage Road C Alterations 05/04/12 awaiting Information SL 40, DL4102, Splan VR1290, NWD - 40 Garibaldi Dr., Whistler (Black Tusk 1741 Village) D Addition to SFD 10/04/12 awaiting Information
Lot 132. DL 891, Grp 1, Plan BCP20004, 1742 NWD - 930 Thistle Place, Britannia Beach D SFD 16/04/12 awaiting Information Strata Lot 1, D:'s 5380, 5384 & 8543, Strata Plan KAS3735, LLD - 6608 1743 Tyaughton Lake A SFD 17/04/12 awaiting Information Lot A, DL 164, Plan 28917, LLD - 7557 Demolition - Old PSS 1744 Pemberton Portage Road, Pemberton C High School 18/04/12 Issued Lot 1, DL 7325, Plan 13919, LLD - 645 S 1745 Gun Lake Rd., Gun Lake A SFD 02/04/12 awaiting Information Parcel 1 of Block A in the Slosh or Shalath IR No. 1 Except Plan B6269, 1746 Seton Portage B Demolition - House #9 25/04/12 Issued Parcel 1 of Block A in the Slosh or Shalath IR No. 1 Except Plan B6269, Demolition - House 1747 Seton Portage B #37 25/04/12 Issued Parcel 1 of Block A in the Slosh or Shalath IR No. 1 Except Plan B6269, Demolition - House 1748 Seton Portage B #40 25/04/12 Issued Parcel 1 of Block A in the Slosh or Shalath IR No. 1 Except Plan B6269, Demolition - House 1749 Seton Portage B #60 25/04/12 Issued Parcel 1 of Block A in the Slosh or Shalath IR No. 1 Except Plan B6269, Demolition - House 1750 Seton Portage B #65 25/04/12 Issued Parcel 1 of Block A in the Slosh or Shalath IR No. 1 Except Plan B6269, Demolition - House 1751 Seton Portage B #66 25/04/12 Issued
Page 8 of 82 April 2012 Monthly Building Report For information
Parcel 1 of Block A in the Slosh or Shalath IR No. 1 Except Plan B6269, Demolition - House 1752 Seton Portage B #67 25/04/12 Issued Parcel 1 of Block A in the Slosh or Shalath IR No. 1 Except Plan B6269, Demolition - House 1753 Seton Portage B #68 25/04/12 Issued Lot 154, DL's 1897, 2734 & 7169A, Grp 1, Plan BCP20031 - 1066 Goat Ridge Dr., 1754 Britannia Beach D Retaining Walls 27/04/12 awaiting Information
Page 9 of 82 Select Funds Report
SPECIAL GENERAL SERVICES 2012 as at 30-Apr-12 Cost Centre 2900 General Select
REVENUE: 40220 Interest Earned 42000 Surplus/Deficit Fwd 212,285.00 43000 Trans from Other Services (Hydro Grant) 43,361.94 Total Revenue 255,646.94
EXPENDITURES: 51000 Electoral / Select Services:
Southern Interior Beetle Action Coalition 2012 Funding 5,000.00 Sea to Sky Crime Stoppers 2012 Funding 2,500.00
7,500.00
0.00
Total Expenditures 7,500.00
Balance of Funds (excluding unpaid commitments) 248,146.94
Allocations committed but not yet paid Prior Year Commitments: 4 Fire Halls - Area C (150K - 50K for Birken) 100,000.00 Portal Idenfication Area A 9,000.00 Portal Idenfication Area B 10,000.00 Portal Idenfication Area C 10,000.00 Portal Idenfication Area D 10,000.00 Pemberton Transit -3200 2011 BC Hydro Grant allocation- remainder 378.16 Pemberton Transit -3200 2012 BC Hydro Grant Allocation 19,587.00 Squamish Public Library 2012 BC Hydro Grant Allocation 13,508.00
Total Allocations Committed but not paid 172,473.16
BALANCE OF FUNDS NOT SPENT OR COMMITTED $ 75,673.78
Q:\SelectServices\Select Services 2012.xlsxGen Select 2900
Page 10 of 82 Select Funds Report
ELECTORAL AREA A SELECT SERVICES 2012 as at 30-Apr-12 Cost Centre 2901 Area A Select
REVENUE: 40220 Interest Earned 42000 Surplus/Deficit Fwd 24,145.02 43000 Trans from Other Services (Hydro Grant) 48,765.31 Total Revenue 72,910.33
EXPENDITURES: 51000 Electoral / Select Services: from alloc. BRVEDS Upper Bridge River Valley Society Consolidation 553.48 Complete the tenure for the Bralorne Ski Hill; and pay for current liability insurance premiums for ski hill Bralorne-Bridge River Community Assoc operation 3,200.00 March EAD BC Business Magazine Bralorne Gold Mines recognition advertisement 702.07 Gun Lake Ratepayers Assoc Refund for repair of Gun Lake Boat Launch -225.00 4,230.55
Total Expenditures 4,230.55
Balance of Funds (excluding unpaid commitments) 68,679.78
2012 Allocations committed Appreciation Fund 500.00
2011 and Prior -Allocations committed but not yet paid Feasibility study - community groups consolidation (Unspent portion) 1,200.00 Study effects of septic systems on Gun Lake, up to Gun Lake Ratepayers Association 8,000 6,043.77 BRVEDS Upper Bridge River Valley Society Consolidation 7,487.39
Total Allocations Committed but not paid 15,231.16
BALANCE OF FUNDS NOT SPENT OR COMMITTED $ 53,448.62
Note: Funding for the Bralorne Sewer Engineering Report will be provided by Area A Select Funds Reserve Balances
Bralorne Community Hall Reserve Capital and Equipment Reserve 76,138.84
Q:\SelectServices\Select Services 2012.xlsxArea A 2901 05/02/12
Page 11 of 82 Select Funds Report
ELECTORAL AREA B SELECT SERVICES 2012 as at 30-Apr-12 Cost Centre 2902 Area B Select
REVENUE: 40220 Interest Earned 42000 Surplus/Deficit Fwd 2,488.01 43000 Trans from Other Services (Hydro Grant) 48,765.31 Total Revenue 51,253.32
EXPENDITURES: 51000 Electoral / Select Services:
Ts'Kw'aylaxw Community Group Vanentines Pow Wow Funding 500.00
500.00
Total Expenditures 500.00
Balance of Funds (excluding unpaid commitments) 50,753.32
2012 Allocations committed but not yet paid Appreciation Fund 500.00
Total Allocations Committed but not paid 500.00
BALANCE OF FUNDS NOT SPENT OR COMMITTED $ 50,253.32
Reserve Balances
IN 1761 Area B Wildfire equip. & fuel mit. Reserve 137,509.62
Q:\SelectServices\Select Services 2012.xlsx
Page 12 of 82 Select Funds Report
ELECTORAL AREA C SELECT SERVICES 2012 as at 30-Apr-12 Cost Centre 2903 Area C Select
REVENUE: 40220 Interest Earned 42000 Surplus/Deficit Fwd 19,869.93 43000 Trans from Other Services (Hydro Grant) 48,765.31 Total Revenue 68,635.24
EXPENDITURES: 51000 Electoral / Select Services:
Village Of Pemberton 2012 Funding for Winds of Change 2,500.00 Communities that Care Strenghening Families Program 2012 2,500.00 Pemberton Secondary School 2012 Sr. Girls Basketball Championships 1,000.00 from alloc's Positron Communications Area C Communications - copywriting Visitor info guide 305.25 6,305.25
Total Expenditures 6,305.25
Balance of Funds (excluding unpaid commitments) 62,329.99
2012 Allocations committed Appreciation Fund 500.00 Devine Transfer Station gate repairs 850.00
2011 and Prior -Allocations committed but not yet paid Pemberton Secondary School $1,000/yr scholarship for 5 years 3,000.00 Electoral Area C Communications (remainder) 409.73 D'arcy/Devine/N'Quatqua Fire service study 3,000.00 Traffic Calming measures for D'Arcy/N'Quatqua (remainder) 1,163.57 CostCo. Fold Up Tables for Gates Lake Property 400.00 Birken Water Line Easement Surveyor & backhoe costs 6,218.00 Total Allocations Committed but not paid 15,541.30
BALANCE OF FUNDS NOT SPENT OR COMMITTED $ 46,788.69
Q:\SelectServices\Select Services 2012.xlsxArea C 2903
Page 13 of 82 Select Funds Report
ELECTORAL AREA D SELECT SERVICES 2012 as at 30-Apr-12 Cost Centre 2904 Area D Select
REVENUE: 40220 Interest Earned 42000 Surplus/Deficit Fwd 24,901.99 43000 Trans from Other Services (Hydro Grant) 48,765.31 Total Revenue 73,667.30
EXPENDITURES: 51000 Electoral / Select Services:
Road name signage for Upper Squamish area from Lynn Rd to Olsen Rd north of Squamish Valley Rd as Wall St - from alloc's Miller Capilano Maintenance Corp Inv# S12-1166 & S12-1172 3966.22 3,966.22
Total Expenditures 3,966.22
Balance of Funds (excluding unpaid commitments) 69,701.08
2012 Allocations committed Appreciation Fund 500.00
2011 and Prior -Allocations committed but not yet paid transportation engineer to conduct a safety audit of the Oliver's Landing train crossing and to prepare a report to the SLRD for review by CN Rail and Transport Canada. 15,000.00 Road name signage for Upper Squamish area from Lynn Rd to Olsen Rd north of Squamish Valley Rd as Wall St 1,033.78 Total Allocations Committed but not paid 16,533.78
BALANCE OF FUNDS NOT SPENT OR COMMITTED $ 53,167.30
Q:\SelectServices\Select Services 2012.xlsxArea D 2904
Page 14 of 82 Information Report - House Numbering Signs
For Information Only House Numbering Signs
Meeting Date: May 14, 2012
Recommendation: Receive the Civic Addressing Status Report
Key Issue(s)/Concepts Defined
At the March meeting the Board of Directors requested that staff prepare a report to outline the options for providing standard house numbering signs throughout the SLRD. The Directors noted that they had seen examples of the types of signs they are interested in on the roads within the Thompson Nicola Regional District, and in the Okanagan Similkameen Regional District.
Relevant Policies
SLRD Civic Addressing Regulatory Bylaw No. 1123 requires that house numbers be posted, and sets out a minimum requirements for the size of the numerals, but does not set out any other requirements related to the size or style of the sign.
Background
As per the EAD Committee’s suggestion, staff consulted two other Regional Districts whom it was noted appeared to have standardized signage in place, the RDOS and the TNRD. Staff at both of those jurisdictions clarified that they actually do not have any sign programs in place, and that when standardized signs are seen they are essentially the product of local area initiatives, not a coordinated effort or regulation across the Regional District. Below is a summary of the information gathered from those Regional Districts.
The Regional District of Okanagan Similkameen (RDOS). The RDOS did initiate a house number sign program a number of years ago, likely as part of their 911 implementation, but it was taken up by the individual electoral areas or local communities. According to the recollection of current staff, in some cases the Area Director (perhaps through select funds and pulling together volunteer labour) supported the acquisition of signage. In other areas it was volunteer groups such as the volunteer fire departments that set up a program for their service area. In the case of it being a volunteer group, the way it typically works is that the volunteer group canvasses the neighbourhood, takes ‘orders’ for signs, then prepares (and sometimes even installs) the signs for a set fee, with proceeds going to the organization.
Staff at the RDOS explained that the house number sign program was a one-time initiative, and that there are currently no requirements to post any particular type of house number sign. At this time it is up to individuals to post any sign they like; there are no on-going programs.
The Thompson Nicola Regional District (TNRD) TNRD does not have any program in place for house number signs either. TNRD staff explained that several of the First Nations communities within their area have contracted out the work to establish civic addressing, and often as part of those contracts, the company includes the acquisition and posting of standardized metal, reflective signs, such as one sees on Highway 12 between Lillooet and
Page 15 of 82 Information Report - House Numbering Signs
For Information Only House Numbering Signs
Lytton.
TNRD staff also explained that in some other communities the volunteer fire departments or other community organizations undertook a house number sign program as a fund-raising initiative.
They clarified that they do not have any on-going programs in place.
Options for Consideration
Option 1 – buy signs for all existing addresses
If the SLRD wanted to simply purchase a house number sign for all existing addresses within the Electoral Areas a very rough estimate is about $40,000. This is based on a very rough calculation of 2000 addresses, at $20 per sign. Recently the Upper Squamish Valley neighbourhood ordered 50 reflective, metal house number signs for their community. The price of those from a sign making shop in Squamish was $22 per sign.
The advantage of this option is that it would establish standard signage throughout the Electoral Areas.
There are a number of possible issues for the SLRD under this option, from the high cost at the outset, to staff time and resources required for administration, to the logistical challenges of handling and distributing hundreds of signs. This option also raises the question of whether this is a one-time service offer, or if the SLRD would continue to supply new numbers in the future; who replaces stolen or damaged signs; and how to ensure that the signs are posted at all.
Another consideration is whether all neighbourhoods actually would benefit from new signage. For example, in much of Howe Sound East the communities have street lights and small lots with short driveways, where requiring a standard reflective metal sign would not be necessary or desirable for the community. However in more rural neighbourhoods where many houses are not visible from the road, where there is no street lighting, and where vehicles are often travelling at faster speeds, standard reflective metal signs may be the best option.
Option 2 – encourage local communities or emergency service organizations to initiate programs
The SLRD may want to consider encouraging community groups and volunteer fire departments (VFD) to initiate a house number sign program for fundraising. As noted above, that is the main way that the TNRD and the RDOS ended up with some standardized signs within the their regional districts. It appears that it is most often fire departments who are interested in having clearer signage, and who often have ‘labour’ on hand to help organize the program and may even offer a service to come and erect the sign at an appropriate location on the house or driveway. Staff believe that in some cases the VFDs have fabricated the signs themselves, perhaps using reflective stick on numbers on blank metal plates, thus saving on the production cost, and allowing them to offer the sign for a reasonable price and still make a ‘profit’ to go into the department.
Under this option the SLRD could consider offering support in terms of staff on a particular day to help assemble or erect signs. The Electoral Area Director could also consider contributing matching funds, though the use of select funds, to what is raised under the program.
Page 16 of 82 Information Report - House Numbering Signs
For Information Only House Numbering Signs
The advantage of this option is that it would work towards each community having standardized signs that would be clear for emergency responders. It also has the advantage of being driven from within the community, and each program can be adjusted in terms of how it is set-up, to suit the particular needs and desires of that community or organization.
Option 3 - status quo
SLRD Civic Addressing Regulatory Bylaw No. 1123 requires that house numbers be posted, and sets out minimum requirements for the size of the numerals, and that they be either reflective or high contrast, but does not actually set out exact specifications for the size or style of the sign. The SLRD does not actively enforce this bylaw requirement, and staff suggest that it would be a significant undertaking to begin enforcing it.
Staff have occasionally received a call from a resident who is concerned that neighbours on their street have not posted their addresses, but generally it appears that most residents want to post their house number, and are careful to ensure that emergency responders and others can quickly and easily find their house.
Analysis
Having highly visible, reflective, standardized signs may be something that certain neighbourhoods or communities would like, and is likely something that most fire department and other emergency responders would support. It appears that it is not something that is typically undertaken by Regional Districts as a broader initiative, but rather it is something that is most often a local initiative.
Given the broad range of neighbourhoods, from Britannia Beach to Tyaughton Lake, and the varying degrees of need for ‘standardized’ signs, it appears that local programs may be best suited to meet the local needs, and to keep the program at a scale that is more easily managed.
Staff suggest that if VFDs are interested in pursuing this type of program we can provide a list of addresses within their fire service areas. At the Direction of the Board, staff could encourage the VFDs to undertake such a program.
Submitted by: Tracy Napier, Planner Reviewed by: K. Needham, Director of Planning and Development Approved by: L. Flynn, CAO
Page 17 of 82 Information Report - McGillivray Creek Information
For Information Only McGillivray Creek Information
Meeting Date: May 14, 2012
Recommendation: Receive the information related to McGillivray Creek and Tribal Parks as background to the presentation by Mr. Bill Pekonen and Mr. Don McGee
Key Issue(s)/Concepts Defined:
Mr. Bill Pekonen and Don McGee are scheduled to speak about issues related to McGillivray Creek at the request of the EAD, and wish to also speak to the creation of Tribal Parks.
Background:
On April 10, 2012, the EAD received a short report regarding McGillivray Creek. On May 1, 2012, Lynda Flynn, CAO and Kim Needham, Director of Planning and Development, met with Mr. Bill Pekonen and Don McGee to discuss the McGillivray Trail. They provided documentation and historical information related to the McGilllivray Trail. They also discussed issues related to the Western Canada Wilderness Committee’s proposed Tribal Parks.
Misters Pekonen and McGee will present this information to the EAD.
Information associated with their presentation is attached as follows:
April 10 letter to the EAD Presentation Highway definition Wilderness Committee article regarding Tribal Parks
Background documentation includes:
History of McGillivray area
Submitted by: K. Needham, Director of Planning and Development Approved by: L. Flynn, CAO
Page 18 of 82 Information Report - McGillivray Creek Information
DAW HOLDINGS LTD. (DAW) 201 7300 MOFFATT ROAD RK..HMONDBC. tJGY I X8 PHONE 6O42708726 FAX 6042708709 PRESENTATION TO BOARDOF DIRECTORS Squamsh Uflooet Regional DistrIct May14, 2012. ctAatters Wilderness Committee proposal to create Tribal Parks within the District - The Historic Public McGiiiivray Creek Trail Road,
We welcome this opportunty to share pertinent information, Many details have been located and analyzed. Ne would be oleased to answer questions from the Board of Directors and are willingto supply at a later date additional information. istronoly es the rnaritenance res on ity Dro en Delo to the Dro\Iincjal Government and that the re-onenno of ne ‘IcGvrav Crnek rah PaO hobwav ‘sould a benefit to the SLRD re ionjn numerous differe ntvs,
ess Corn tjttee RenorHo create ‘/en’ IarIle Ben dor and Ca’ioosh Tnbal Parks A plan was announced byt.heWilderness Committeeina membershipnewsletter dated January 2Otn 2012 RconcerneaabouttneeffectoftheovereachnBendorPIan bectiontotheaflocationoftheCaoeshTniba!ParkThisLostVa!Ie’areaistruI dern ass area with numerous mountain oats.
GiIIivrav Creek Trail Road (a hi h’ia’ constructed/ma inta it appears that, after studying many governmnentdocuments, surveyor F’’eldBook Notes, Official Plans, maps of various kinas and dates, Hubiic Accounts, Ministeriai Reports dating from since 1874 and earlier, and more than 150 court decisions, that the 56 km. (35 mile) McGillivray Creek Trail Road is a common law public highway. See attached.i Conclusion: Funds to clear and Im rgve the McGjilivra Creek Trail Road During the fall of 2008, DAVVsubmitted a request of $250,000 to the all-party Provincial Select Committee of Finance and Government Services. The amount was to be designated to clear and improve the approximate 25 km. route between Anderson Lake and Piebiter Creek that has lacked maintenance. The committee commented that this would be a worthwhile project. However, funds were not available in the next budget despite the funding received from the Federal Government for infrastructure roects. Our eronosal was and still is shovel ready”. DAW intends to seek provincial funding again during the fall months of 2012, prior to the next election, even though our lone request may not resonate loudly enough. :LeislativeConflicts There are major conflicts between the intent and purpose of the Land Act, the Transportation Act, the Land Registry Acts, the Forestry Act, the Mining Act, the Railway Act, and more than 20 other Acts that involvetravel over public and private lands. The main conflict appears to be in respect to the definition of the word “highway.” This matter may be complicated by the fact that the MOT’s budgetary concerns appear to over-ride their duty to maintain access for the benefit of the travelling public. It certainly appears as if MOTattempts to avoid adopting responsblity for highway maintenance cy applying subsequent Iegislaton n a retroactive manner and appears to have difficulty in recognizing Common Law Public Highways in B.C. This creates problems for travellers and and owners using old public ways that can be considered as common law highways providing access to, on, over and through private lands. cHihvva’s In this presentation, DAVUis relying on the definition of Common Law highways as outlined on the next page.
Page 19 of 82
Information Report
maintaining
from
these
iegisiation
from
1910,
and
language of
‘:
ouiidings
a
ts
:iabf
each
oad
A
Brunswick
nighway
Oanad’a
simple
bridle-path:
Berton-.Eccies
on
hign
the
public
$
are
rulings
trait
to
wate
case
4.000
way
consolidation
pmc.
term’:,
the
on
in
construction including
or
roads,
public
according
“:a
cri’rts
is
respect
erther
to
fall
Supreme
each same
part
if
a
if
for
in
road,
it imi7
6.000
Stylec
ways. o(
201
in
(18831
t-ri
H
side,
line
at
cf
cattle,
thing,
highway,
a
my
to
‘s
or; C’hefheron
sea
of
higuwoy.
to
e:,
hut
Courf
has
-
with
costs
trespass
per
land
opinion, more -
.
7300
land
- the
McGillivray Creek Information
or
or
havc
PF’ONE
8
a
a
o’,r-ry
City
mile.
App.
the
“:j
road
dr,ft-way:
rather
on right
lo’.’wr
were ri
and use
‘
may
MOFFATT
o”r
of
a
1.000
p;ecs
issues
Rideour
less
wholly
‘s
Cas.
DAW
land
river
of
fined
(Source
any
powers
‘/‘ctorlo
less every
-,:‘:tior
not
be
passage.
‘chich
‘04
continuous
or
year
argument
of
or
7.98
HGHWY
a
it
than necessarily
on
fails.
rf
HOLDINGS
h;nd
public foot-oath,
is
,iiater,)
a. 2707’
bicyh’r”:vto
into
for
The H
88CR.
both
old
(Note:
ca/ld
Howleti,
at
ROAD
$500
norses,
members
.‘vr;or
if
Styles
p.
the
definition
Year
road
for along
public
i’mn’:trrjoticr
depending
801)
(per
.‘Hmpiv
hands
‘Pass
ocr
foot
or
a
DEFNED
406
January
RiCHMOND
Book
is
s
v.
nignway,
cean
ca,riaqes
ftX
bridle-path,
Lord
or
mile.
and
subjact
In
a
LTD
passengers
City
of
at
ano
of
over
of
highway.
a
sub-sect/on
the
of
400
private
the
Se/borne
the
“highway”
whereas
on
of
repass’
28,
British
standard
(DAW)
which
oublic
to
word Victoria
4—27q-709
the
Mr!stry
and
1213,
such
or
land.
distinction
BC.
A
Columbia.
oniy,
carts,
the
drift-way
in
‘highway”
are
means
road
street 127,
publ:c
than
4
Robinson
8
para
responsible
public
Other
entitled
highway
B.
VGY
a
construction
then
the
foot-path,
CR.
is
a
graph
going
rignt
on
between
road.
a
Legislature generally
questions
and
1911.)
a
1X8 roadway
Page 20 of 82
406
to
a
high-road.
v.
and
o
high-road.
back
10,
the
pass
Local
for
During
at
passage
if
a
Plow
higi’ways
resulting
ranged
for
414
Both
public
arid
has
and
arise
with
Board
riders,
used
forth.)
if
a
of
in
;s
it a Information Report - McGillivray Creek Information
McGillivray Creek trail Road I Bridge River Public Road Extension Common Law Public Highway
McG1(llvray Creek Trail Road Part of the Bridge River Highway Network Anderson Lake to Goldbridge Section April 30, 2012
Comments by His Honour Joseph William Trutch, Lieutenant Governor of British Columbia upon the prorogation of the Third Session, First Legislative Assembly on 2nd March, 1874
The policy of preparing our Province forsettlement by the building of Colonization roads and trails, the construction of importantworks, and the extension of suiveys, upon a scale not hitherto attemptecJ meets with my hearty approval.
This policy is the true basis of a successful Immigration scheme in the future. Its advantages are not even confined to success in this quarter. it willstimulate trade. It willimprove the condition, and increase the prosperity of our farmers by affordmg them easy access to new and, at presen inaccessible markets for the sale of their produce. it willensure profitable employment to our mechanics. it willdevelop our mineral wealth. it willmaterially assist our pastoral interest and thus retain for expenditure in the Province partially, if not wholly, large sums of money which have hitherto been paid by us to foreign markets. I have therefore cheerfully assented to the appropriations, which you have withprudent liberality made for those objects; as beneficial results of a permanent character are sure to flow from legislation so directed.
I McCRT dn FRS Administration Ltd. Paae 1
Page 21 of 82
Information Report
1
McGCaT.ooc
Other
Chinese
Coldbhdgo
the
Fields
point
settlement
Goldbridge
100 5.
the
make
oiume
‘inn
a
at
Indian
higriway
was
of
eat
from
significant
little
It
A.
rf
placer
hi
pre-empted
has
Reserve
which
traffic
W.
of
sense
along
area.
sh.
at
do
the
been
Smith
aur’ms
miners.
not
The
partculars
orospectcrs
Indian
the
in
Smith
The
and
report 0 cj
McGWivray
need
a
pnmt;ve
was
during
McGir.iray
rural end
- less
McGillivray Creek Information
fronts
Reserve
assumed
asphalt
a
at
area.
are gold
than
the
fl
corners
travelled
Creek
nature
on
sever
available.
Colonial
buyer,
io
C.eai<
boundary
nderson
paving
ownership
Trail
Common
c
lane
along rta
-
;CQuntS
aicrg
the
active
TrwI
Road
at
Period.
roads
Mamffusrratlon
for
ruads
high
Lake.
the
Road
Law
Anderson
of
I
along
the
route.
Bridge
costs
DL.
can
war
Pibllc
encourages
The
Nequatcue
This
to
the
100 be
,‘.
buy
Rer
Crown
LW.
simp’y
Travelling
Highway
is Lake
‘.
McGiilvray
made
in
gold
the
Puhic
D’Arcy
S,Jth
on
Grant
former
to
Indian
safer
from
safer
their
meet
at
Road
uvCQ
on
was
high
Creek
drang
rock
for
site Bane.
ay
January
construction
Extewion
drivers
held
speeds
minere,
of
to
Trail
practices.
ueiveen
Port
tIe
DL
back 17,
Page 22 of 82
by
Road
Anderson,
10fl
Barkerde
in
and
improving
1888.
pending
stanciards
modern
DAicy’ is
Indian
and
Pane vage
.
between
DL.
at
the
cars
the
O.dd
10
and
of
or
the
the that i3/’i5/212 Information Report
1
¶3:
To March the Squamish Can
government From: is According or tenure established It the Orants adequate pesent Creek 1902 Lake constructed road road. Lands.
years This length right doubles still and LtGovernor This Columbia. During threatened 1946.
have
information
is
LRDj4.d
11
responsible
by
St’at’rnic cracks.
Mr.
believed
you exists, trails
original
road
going
of and
to
an
been
ago,
The
Road
to
The of
and
Re:
3,
1874,
passage Goldbridge
and FRS
A
Peter
advise abuse
during
427079
accommodate
further
roads
research,
to
was
2012
copy
to
names
forest
via width
west
and
Bralorne.
mineral
LiIlooat This 35
rights.
is
future seems is
open
In
in
I Indian
35
that
the
Administration
a
do
avail
for
constructed
the preserved
accordance
Feb. -
his
of
mile
will who that De
in is
mile McGillivray Creek Information
201
from
that
route confirmed
non-aboriginal
of
not
fires
the
process.
all of
the
the available
Mcc3illivray
speech
rights
Jong,
to
claim the Bands? the
become
24th time.
The
ble.
parts I
(56
56
know
matters - Regional
has
SLRD
The
Anderson
should country Phone:
Srat’Imc
If
be
7300
Anderson
raged
is
raadltraii
highway
the
4
km.)
reference
letter also
Km.) involved.
of
existed
as wheeled
parcels
measurements
it of
Director
from
who
and
with
fire
by
needs
travel
from
is
even
It a
Moffatt
that
along
dealing
According
contact
Mcoillivray
necessary
up
is historic
Creek
believed the
by
Ltd.
territory. 604-270-8726
had
maintaIned I
the Historic
District
Lake provincial population
between
hoped
should
BCLTSA. to
is
for
route
Donovan showing
more
by Lake
survey to
vehicles,
map
both
33
Legislative settlement
reached
of
more
with Road be
the Fax
Road,
in
was
Bill
feet
highway
Administration.
have
that
that important
241269
respect
to
aware
the
contact
to
for
public
show
Creek
McQilhivrav
Anderson
of
it
Indian
BY
denoted
than
the
604-270-8709 Pekonen the
towards
on
polIcies
by Goldbridge
&
was
is
the
this
Hurley The
the
DL
Richmond, Bralorne,
changed
Company, it
FAX
either
possible the
BNA
progression
of
and
the
Buildings.
was has and
130
4363 SLRD are
Trail to
safety
only
to attached
area
Fax
Bands.
the
at
within
(information expenditure
the
on location
to make
to
River
as
Anderson
Act,
years.
been not
that
Lake
produced
side
has attached about
gazetted
will
encourage
over 604-270-8709
surveys recognizes
the
negotiations
theIr announced
604-894 of
Creek
that,
Jeopardized
Section
the me
the
sure
travelled
and people been of and
become
However, is
B.
The
time
of
10,000 of
only the
e-mail a
public Province
next through
April
C.
Bridge Goldbrldge
the
list that the Lake.
information Dec. by
Road! of
widened
and
purpose
centre
91, 6526
VSY
escape living
50
resource public the
of
route
The and the centre
March
this
people.
for
continue
gazetted
being 19, the
tIle
by years surveyed
ignorance
River
Department
Further
is
new
more
previously
highway protects
10, IXB Trail
line.
public al In
1919.
Paies
provincial
from federal
along
was
money
negotiating
on
line
2,
Bralorne. lack
might conducted Page 23 of 82
as
frontier so
development.
roads,
That
1874 land than
to
January
to
2012 The
Anderson
the of supporting
that
McGillivray
It’s Crown
of
have
was
those
build government
prior
or
the
fall
same
would
knowledge
130 waggon
population by
of
entire
9
the
and
lack
in
through trail
the
the Crown
the
A
to EAD
roads with
years.
30, British P’E
Land
long
past.
need
few
of
received or
meeting)
fli Information Report - I McGillivray Creek Information
I Page 24 of 82 Information Report - McGillivray Creek Information
a
Page 25 of 82 if
m 1> P1 Information Report
LD - I McGillivray Creek Information
I r
Page 26 of 82 F
-U Information Report - I McGillivray Creek Information
I,
Page 27 of 82 I
-o
01
Lii Information Report - McGillivray Creek Information
Page 28 of 82
-o
0’ Information Report - I McGillivray Creek Information
a
Page 29 of 82 I
-o rn Information Report - I McGillivray Creek Information
Page 30 of 82 I Information Report
a a a a - I’Ij1Uii’1P 111111 II rI9I I McGillivray Creek Information
——*
z
I t
1__ — Page 31 of 82 r llt IPIJI IP I it I tr ‘1’ iIt i -U I m Information Report - McGillivray Creek Information
Vol.31 No.1 Winter 2012 Published by the Wilderness Committee
FREE REPORT Bendor and Cayoosh Mountains
Tribal Park Protection Needed Now!
Beautiful Lands of the St'át'imc Joe Foy National Campaign Portage, Shalalth, Samahquam, Skatin which means they have pockets of both proposed tribal parks encompassing Director, and Douglas are strategically located on types of habitat. Unfortunately both the Bendor and Cayoosh mountains. Wilderness Committee trail and canoe routes that are thousands ranges are under threat from proposed This is an important step forward of years old near some of the world's industrial developments including that needs to be taken, and one most productive wild salmon rivers.1 logging and a proposed ski resort. So that is long overdue. Read on to Within St'át'imc territory are some of far the rugged nature of the Bendor and learn how you can help gain tribal here do I go when I want my favourite protected areas, including Cayoosh mountains and the courageous park protection for the Bendor and Wto see some of the wildest, portions of Garibaldi Provincial Park, nature of the St'át'imc people have Cayoosh mountains! most beautiful landscapes in the Stein Valley Nlaka'pamux Heritage been able to fend off the worst of the world? Where do I go when I want to Park and South Chilcotin Mountains industrial projects, which is why these Learn about the experience a place and a culture where Provincial Park. areas are still so wild and beautiful. But St'át'imc people people have lived for centuries upon However, two wilderness mountain for how long? centuries? I go to St'át'imc of course! ranges located in the heart of St'át'imc The St'át'imc have produced a land- and their land Several hundred kilometres to territory that are critical to the region's use plan for the northern portion of at statimc.net the north of Vancouver, BC lies the ecological and cultural well-being are their territory. The land-use plan was mountainous country of the St'át'imc not yet protected. The Bendor and developed using an ecosystem-based (pronounced Sta-at-lee-um). Cayoosh mountains have amazing planning process, relying on traditional St'át'imc communities at Lillooet, flower-filled alpine meadows, extensive knowledge of the St'át'imc people and Cayoose Creek, Bridge River, Fountain, old-growth forests, cascading wild rivers supported by scientific research.3 Pavilion, Mount Currie, N'Quatqua, Seton and spectacular peaks. The Bendor and Cayoosh mountains Both the Bendor and are highlighted in the St'át'imc land- Cayoosh mountains have a use plan as being very significant for rich legacy of ancient St'át'imc the protection of St'át'imc culture, as travel trails and archaeological well as for grizzly bears, old-growth sites.2 Hiking through these forests and sensitive ecosystems.4 The ranges is like taking a step two mountain ranges also harbour back in time when trade important mule deer habitat, which routes wound through forests are an essential cultural food source for and alpine passes to link the St'át'imc people. tribes to one another. These important wild areas deserve Photo top: Headwaters of the Lost Valley, Cayoosh Mountains (Jeremy Sean Williams), These mountains straddle protection. It's time that the BC Photo above: Grizzly bear (John E Marriott), the transition zone between government honour the St'át'imc land- Photo left: St’át’imc and Wilderness Committee trail finders in the headwaters of the coast and the interior, use plan by legally designating the two Melvin Creek, Cayoosh Mountains.
Page 32 of 82 Information Report Bendor and Cayoosh Mountains a Wilderness Wonderland! What are Tribal Parks? Bendor Tribal Park ribal parks in British Columbia recognized by the provincial and/or sanctuary for marine and seashore he 69,019 hectare proposed has been working for years with about 100 km west of Lillooet near valleys. McGillivray Creek is a Twere designated for the first federal government, they are managed wildlife, as well as a protected area TBendor Tribal Park lies the St'át'imc in the Bendor Range the village of Seton Portage. Now popular access for backcountry
time by First Nations in the 1980s on by the First Nation in cooperation with encompassing many ancient villages to the west of Anderson and to restore their old trails. BC Timber the battle is on to save the trees hiking as well as routes that begin - McGillivray Creek Information Meares Island in Clayoquot Sound, and the governments, who also fund the and spiritual gathering places. It has Seton lakes, and is bound on the Sales (BCTS), a taxpayer subsidized, so St'át'imc youth, hunters and on the roads leading out of the on Haida Gwaii off the northwest coast operations of the tribal park. been managed cooperatively by the north by Carpenter Lake. The money-losing BC government- food/medicine plant collectors can old mining town of Bralorne up of BC.5 For example, the 110,000 hectare governments of the Haida Nation and proposed tribal park boundaries run logging company is currently continue their age old use of trails Cadwallader Creek.12 Stein Valley Nlaka'pamux Heritage Park Canada since 1993. encompass the eastern portion threatening to log a patch of for traditional purposes unimpeded The Bendor Range is very was declared a co-managed provincial The proposed Ha'uukmin and of the Bendor Mountain Range, scraggly telephone pole-sized by clearcuts and logging debris. important habitat for grizzly bears. protected area in 1995 after a 25 Meares Island Tribal Parks in Clayoquot which has more of the remaining Douglas fir trees along the route of In the southern Bendors, the A recent grizzly study identified 47 year-long campaign by First Nations Sound are old-growth rainforest pristine valleys than the western one of the ancient traditional trails Wilderness Committee is helping individual grizzlies within the area.13 and conservationists that sought wilderness areas and sites rich in part of the range, where there in the northern part of the Bendors. the people of N'Quatqua clear This range is an important habitat wilderness preservation and protection archaeology, where the Tla-o-qui-aht has been more industrial The trail is in a pristine and their ancient traditional trails - connector for grizzlies between of tribal heritage. The Stein River Valley First Nation practice restorative justice, development, including logging, isolated area with no road access also threatened by logging - that the South Chilcotin Mountains 8 is a very important spiritual place and cultural and spiritual training. Photo: Enjoying In-Shuck-ch Days mining and hydropower project. encompassing Upper Whitecap, travel through the D'Arcy, Phelix, Provincial Park, the Cayoosh Photo: Mouth of Nosebag Creek that runs for both Nlaka'pamux and St'át'imc In the 2000s, the BC government community celebration. The Wilderness Committee Nosebag, Tommy and Keary creeks, McGillivray and Cadwallader creeks Mountain Range and the Stein into Carpenter Lake, Bendor Mountains. people, a habitat for wild plants and brought in new legislation to better over 100 conservancies have also been Valley Heritage Park.
Although typically grounded in animals sacred to the tribes, as well incorporate tribal parks into the designated in the Great Bear Rainforest Yalakam River Fraser River Genetic testing has 10 South Chilcotin environmental concerns for nature, as an important ancient travel route protected areas system. Protected and on Haida Gwaii. Mountains Provincial Park revealed that grizzly such as protection of old-growth linking the Fraser River Valley to the areas, called conservancies, specifically The newest tribal park to be Fred bear populations Page 33 of 82 forests, endangered species and Lillooet River Valley.6 recognize First Nations' rights on declared by a First Nation is 90,000 Antoine in BC’s southern Provincial Pavilion roadless wilderness, tribal parks also Another long campaign by the land and provide for economic hectares in size and straddles the Carpenter Lake Park Coast Mountains are have a dominant social, cultural and First Nations and conservationists development opportunities consistent Alberta-BC border near Fort St John. becoming isolated. spiritual function. eventually resulted in the 147,000 with the protection of nature. In 2007, K'ih tsaa?dze, the proposed name of River Providing for greater Gold Bridge Bridge River Tribal parks are typically designated hectare Gwaii Haanas National Park several of the Squamish Nation's Wild the tribal park, means "old-growth connectivity between Downton Lake Mt Bridge by a First Nation within their territory. Reserve and Haida Heritage Site on Spirt Places were protected under the area" and was designated in 2011 by Truax Proposed areas of grizzly habitat Bridge River When they are eventually legally Haida Gwaii.7 It was designated as a conservancy legislation.9 Since 2006, the Doig River Nation.11 is key to the bears’ Bralorne Keary Creek continued survival. Big 97 Tommy Creek Creek Nosebag Creek Fountain It is also very British Bendor Shalalth Provincial Whitecap Creek Park Columbia Cadwallader Creek Whitecap Seton Seton Lake important to respect Ts'yl-Os Clinton Mtn Lillooet Provincial South Chilcotin Mt Portage St'át'imc culture and McGillivray Park Mountains Fraser River Provincial Park Hurley River management authority 99 Cache Creek Proposed Cayoose 1 Tribal of the lands directly Proposed Ashcroft 99 Lillooet Creek Kamloops Phelix Creek to the north of the 0 25 km Lillooet River Tribal Anderson Lake Fraser River 1 Parks 99 McGillivray Creek proposed Bendor 5 Cayoosh Downton Cr Tribal Park to maintain map inset Birkenhead Lake Park Mt.Currie Stein Valley deer and moose Pemberton Lillooet R. Provincial Park Lost Valley Creek Nlaka'pamux Lytton Heritage Park D'Arcy populations. This is Whistler Merritt N'Quatqua 1 Bendor Mountain Range one of the St'át'imc’s Samahquam Haylmore Creek Cayoosh Creek Garibaldi Skatin Melvin Cr primary hunting Fraser Highways Tribal 99 Provincial 5 grounds. Here, poorly Park Douglas Canyon Main Roads 0 5 10 km Squamish Coquihalla Proposed Cayoosh & Bendor Tribal Parks Duffey planned logging and Pass Lake Exisiting BC Parks, Conservancies & Protected Areas Mt mining developments Marriott Provincial St'át'imc Reserves Fraser River Park Park are the two main Salish Sea Hope Young Forest Cayoosh Mountain Range causes of habitat Manning Old-growth Forest Cayoosh Vancouver Chilliwack Mtn Stein Valley destruction. It’s past Provincial 99 Alpine Nlaka'pamux 1 Park time to stop destroying St'át'imc Territory Ice & Snow Joffre Lakes & Cerise Heritage Park Washington (USA) Creek Provincial Parks these traditional lands. Cayoosh Tribal Park he 54,000 hectare proposed an estimated 24 grizzly bears still will be essential if this species is ever Current threats TCayoosh Tribal Park is a diverse surviving in the region in an isolated to recover to a healthy population in to the Cayoosh mix of high alpine ridges, peaks and population.15 Hunting, logging Canada.16 Range include valley-bottom old-growth forests. It and highway construction have all Running for 20 kilometres an all-season is a St'át'imc paradise with stunning lowered the grizzly population over through the Cayoosh Range from destination resort, mountain views and hiking routes the years. Preserving the remaining north to south is Lost Valley, the which since the that go for many kilometres. wilderness here is critical to their largest unlogged drainage in the 1990s has been The proposed tribal park chances for survival and recovery proposed tribal park. For over ten proposed for boundaries encompass the north- to a higher, stable population in years the Wilderness Committee has the Melvin Creek eastern portion of the mountain the future. been working with the St'át'imc to watershed. The Photo: Along the N'Quatqua trail to Lost Valley, Cayoosh Mountains. range, which is drier and known The low-elevation old-growth restore their ancient trails through resort, if built, Photos clockwise from top left: On top of Nosebag Peak, Bendor Mountains for its open ridge walks. These forests of the Cayoosh Mountain the old-growth forests of Lost would threaten • St’át’imc trail finders crossing Hoshum mountains support an estimated Range have sheltered spotted Valley, and over the surrounding the viability of wildlife within the Valley. In the face of strong Creek, Cayoosh Mountains • Near Twin 14 Lakes, Cayoosh Mountains • Hiking the 350 mountain goats. This is also owls right up until 2008, but this alpine ridges into the Melvin Cayoosh Mountain Range and opposition from the St'át'imc and Lost Valley trail, Cayoosh Mountains a critically important grizzly bear highly endangered species is no Creek drainage. In doing so many surrounding area – especially the conservation groups these harmful • Alpine meadows above Highway 99, Cayoosh Mountains • Mountain goat and migration corridor. longer found there, due to agressive archaeological sites have been grizzly bears and mountain goats. industrial projects have been held kid (Roberta Olenick) • St’át’imc hunting Grizzly bear numbers here are logging in surrounding areas. rediscovered including ancient Logging has been approved off so far. Tribal park protection is grounds north of the Bendor Mountains lower than in the past, with only Preserving the spotted owl's habitat shelters and bark harvesting areas. by the BC government for Lost clearly needed now. Information Report - McGillivray Creek Information
Tribal Parks: The Missing Link for Wildlife Protection
here is no doubt that a strong is only one small piece of a much for example, are on the brink of Tconservation argument exists larger initiative that needs to take being eliminated from Canada for designating new protected place. The designation of an arc completely, due to ongoing aggressive areas in St'át'imc territory. This of protected areas from the coast logging. region is home to many of the last through the Bendor and Cayoosh The Bendor and Cayoosh ranges big, wild, unprotected wilderness mountains, and then to the Fraser meet all the conservation criteria to areas in southwestern BC. St’át’imc Canyon and Coquihalla Pass justify them for protection: they are territory is also strategically located connecting to Manning Park, will remote, mostly pristine natural areas between the coast and the interior be essential for the recovery of that have large low- and mid-elevation of BC, making it a vital connecting endangered wildlife populations. valleys with old-growth forests. They link for wildlife. Simply put, the The Wilderness Committee still have populations of most of the future of many wildlife populations is calling for a doubling of BC’s animals associated with big wilderness, are dependent on establishing a protected area system this decade.18 like grizzly bears, mountain goats, series of “stepping stone” protected In southwestern BC large tracts wolverines, wolves and mountain lions. areas linking the coast of BC to the of all forest types, but in particular BC has nearly 2,000 species of plants interior.17 low-elevation old-growth forest, and animals on the province’s species Sadly, the strategic conservation have been eliminated by over a at risk list, the majority of which reside value of creating protected areas century of logging. Spotted owls, in southern BC. Clearly more habitat within St'át'imc territory is made all mountain goats, grizzly bears and urgently needs to be protected, the more urgent by the universally wild salmon have all suffered from and the designation of Bendor and poor condition of many wildlife the fragmentation of their forest Cayoosh Tribal Parks could be the in- populations. Creating tribal parks in habitats and experienced significant the-nick-of-time salvation for some of the Bendor and Cayoosh mountains population declines.19 Spotted owls, southwestern BC’s most at-risk wildlife.
Photos above: St’át’imc fish camp near Lillooet • Alpine ridge near Melvin Creek watershed, Cayoosh Mountains • Community art in the St’át’imc village of Shalalth. Photos left: Peregrine falcon (Gordon Court) • Logging in St’át’imc territory is one of the main threats to the region’s wilderness and wildlife • Trail finder’s camp in Melvin Creek alpine, Cayoosh Mountains.
more info & citations TAKE Action 1 http://faculty.forestry.ubc.ca/hinch/Jacob_etal_ MASGC_2010.pdf 2 http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wildlife/wsi/ reports/4159_4159_CAYOOSH_GOAT_SEP08_RPT.PDF Show your support for St’Át’imc 3 http://www.statimc.net/report/part1.pdf 4 Grizzly Bear info: http://www.statimc.net/grizzly.html 5 http://wildernesscommittee.org/sites/all/files/ Tribal Parks in the Bendor and publications/2010_meares-island_report_low-res.pdf 6 Stein Valley Nlaka'pamux Heritage Park info http://www. env.gov.bc.ca/bcparks/explore/parkpgs/stein_val/ Cayoosh Mountains! 7 Gwaii Haanas National Park Reserve info http://www. pc.gc.ca/pn-np/bc/gwaiihaanas/natcul/natcul1.aspx 8 http://clayoquotbiosphere.org/web/wp-content/ Write, phone, fax or email BC’s premier Clark now to say how uploads/2011/05/CSBR-Periodic-Review-2010.pdf 9 http://www.nativemaps.org/node/2711 much you want the Bendor and Cayoosh Mountains to be 10 http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/bcparks/program_plan/ program_plan_oct2008.pdf protected as St'át'imc Tribal Parks. 11 http://wildernesscommittee.org/news/first_nations_ band_wants_develop_tribal_park 12 McGillvary Pass hiking info: http://bivouac.com/FtrPg. asp?FtrId=623 The Honourable Christy Clark 13 Bendor Mountain Range Grizzly Bear info: Page 33 - http://www.bchydro.com/bcrp/projects/docs/bridge_ Premier of British Columbia river/06.W.BRG.03.pdf 14 Mountain Goat info: Page 6 – http://www.env.gov. Box 9041, Station PROV GOVT 250-387-1715 bc.ca/wildlife/wsi/reports/4159_4159_CAYOOSH_GOAT_ Photo: William Terry Sr. of Lh7us Seton SEP08_RPT.PDF 15 Victoria, BC, Canada, 250-387-0087 Portage, in an old bark stripping site, http://www.bchydro.com/bcrp/projects/ docs/05.W.Br.01.pdf V8W 9E1 email: [email protected] Lost Valley, Cayoosh Mountains. 16 Spotted Owl info: http://www.bchydro.com/bcrp/ projects/docs/bridge_river/04WBr03.pdf 17 BC Species at Risk info: BC Ecosystems and Species Explorer 2011: http://tinyurl.com/7qwsa45 18 Doubling in a decade BC Parks info – http://tinyurl. WildernessCommittee.org • 1-800-661-WILD (9453) com/6w4b56g 19 BC biodiversity and old growth forest info – http:// tinyurl.com/cmx7jkx I support the Wilderness Committee’s work to secure tribal park protection Yes! for the Bendor and Cayoosh mountains Credits Writing and Editing: Joe Foy, Derrick O'Keefe, Andy Miller. Graphic Design and Layout: Perry Sky Jack, Sue Fox. Enclosed is: $25 $50 $100 Other $ ______Mapping: Geoff Senichenko. clip Fed. reg. charity #11929-3009-RR0001 All photos: Wilderness Committee files except where noted. And return to the: I want to become a member! Enclosed is my annual fee for a: Wilderness Committee, Vol. 31, No 1, 2012. Canadian Wilderness Committee Mail Product Sales Agreement No. 0900567. Posted in P.O. Box 2205, $52 Family Membership $35 Individual Membership Vancouver for free distribution. Printed in Canada on Station Terminal recycled newsprint with vegetable-based inks. Press Run 23,000 © Wilderness Committee 2012. All rights Vancouver, BC V6B 3W2 reserved. Written material may be used without permission NAME PHONE when credit is given. Published by call ADDRESS CITY Wilderness Committee — National Office (604) 683-8220 in the P.O. Box 2205, Station Terminal Vancouver, BC V6B 3W2 Lower Mainland T: 604-683-8220 or 1-800-661-9453 F: 604-683-8229 1-800-661-9453 toll-free PROV Postal Code EMAIL elsewhere in Canada The Wilderness Committee is Canada’s largest membership-based wilderness preservation organization. WILDERNESS COMMITTEE
Page 34 of 82 Request for Decision - Exempt the Gun Lake Fire Protecti...
Request for Decision
Exempt the Gun Lake Fire Protection Society Storage Building from ‘Post- Disaster Building’ Designation
Date: May 14th, 2012
Recommendation: THAT the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Board exempt the proposed Gun Lake Fire Protection Society storage building for a fire truck and related fire-fighting equipment from ‘post- disaster building’ designation.
Recommendation Attachment : Map
Background: The Gun Lake Fire Protection Society wishes to construct a building for the storage of a fire truck and fire-fighting equipment. The BC Building Code designates this type of building as a ‘post-disaster building’ unless exempted from this designation by the authority having jurisdiction.
The 2006 BC Building Code definition of a post-disaster building is: “Post-disaster building” means a building that is essential to the provision of services in the event of a disaster, and includes Hospitals, emergency treatment facilities and blood banks, Telephone exchanges, Power generating stations and electrical substations, Control centres for air, land and marine transportation, Public water treatment and storage facilities, and pumping stations, Sewage treatment facilities and buildings having critical national defence functions, and Buildings of the following types, unless exempted from this designation by the authority having jurisdiction: Emergency response facilities Fire, rescue and police stations and housing for vehicles, aircraft or boats used for such purposes Communications facilities, including radio and televisions stations.
Key Issue(S)/Concepts Defined: The Building Code is divided into two parts: Part 9 deals with buildings not exceeding 600 m2 in building area, and not of assembly occupancy nor a ‘post-disaster building’. This part of the building code is prescriptive and the object is to minimize the registered professional involvement. Part 3 deals with buildings exceeding 600 m2 in building area, buildings of assembly occupancy and ‘post-disaster buildings’. This part of the building code requires registered professional involvement: architectural, structural, plumbing, mechanical, electrical and geotechnical.
The proposed building the Gun Lake Fire Protection Society wishes to build is not a traditional fire hall. It is a building for the housing of a fire truck and related fire-fighting equipment to protect them from the elements. This building will not have any plumbing, office space or any other occupancy other than what is required for the storage of the fire truck and equipment.
To require that this building be designated a ‘post-disaster building’ would substantially increase
Page 35 of 82 Request for Decision - Exempt the Gun Lake Fire Protecti...
Request for Decision
Exempt the Gun Lake Fire Protection Society Storage Building from ‘Post- Disaster Building’ Designation
the cost of construction beyond the means of the Society. The ‘post-disaster building’ designation would require the proposed storage building to be constructed under Part 3 of the building code, and the Society would be required to retain the services of an Architect, a Structural Engineer, a Plumbing Engineer, a Mechanical Engineer, an Electrical Engineer and a Geotechnical Engineer.
The intent is that this building be constructed under Part 9 of the BC Building Code. However, since non-standard construction (shipping containers) is proposed, a structural engineer will be required to provide signed and sealed drawings and letters of assurance. A geotechnical report may also be required depending on the existing soils on the site. It is common at Gun Lake for properties to have pockets of volcanic ash which would be required to be removed and structural fill may be required.
Although this building would be constructed under the 2006 BC Building Code, it is informative to note that the 2012 BC Building Code will be adding seismic provisions for Part 9 buildings. The Gun Lake area will have ‘no seismic provisions’ - see attached map (an excerpt from the draft manual – Lateral Load Requirements, Part 9, BC Building Code 2012).
Response Options: 1. Exempt the proposed Gun Lake Fire Protection Society storage building for a fire truck and related fire-fighting equipment from ‘post-disaster building’ designation. 2. Do not exempt the proposed Gun Lake Fire Protection Society storage building for a fire truck and related fire-fighting apparatus from ‘post-disaster building’ designation.
Preferred Strategy: Response option 1.
Implications Of Recommendation
Legal implications: none.
Financial: none for the SLRD. The exemption will substantially reduce the construction design costs for the Gun Lake Fire Protection Society.
Follow Up Action: none.
Communication: via the building permit application process.
Submitted by: Belinda Moen, Building Inspector Reviewed by: Peter DeJong, Director of Administrative Services Approved by: Lynda Flynn, CAO
Page 36 of 82 Request for Decision - Exempt the Gun Lake Fire Protecti...
Request for Decision
Exempt the Gun Lake Fire Protection Society Storage Building from ‘Post- Disaster Building’ Designation
Page 37 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
REQUEST FOR DECISION Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan Area C
Recommendation:
1. That the SLRD Board of Directors adopt the Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan (AAP) as Board policy.
Report/Document: Attached _X_ Available __ Nil __
Key Issue(s)/Concepts Defined:
The last draft of the Pemberton Valley Agriculture Area Plan was referred out to various agencies and local governments for review and comment.
The attached draft is a revised version based on comments received through the referral process.
Relevant Policy: Electoral Area C OCP contains extensive policies in relation to agriculture. This plan provides elaboration of those policies, and recommends action steps to move towards implementing the policies.
Desired Outcome(s): That the Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan be adopted as Board policy.
Response Options: 1. Adopt the Plan as presented. 2. Adopt the Plan as presented, and direct staff to prepare an amending bylaw to the OCP to adopt the AAP as a sub-area plan to the Area C OCP. 3. Refer back to staff for further revisions and analysis.
Preferred Strategy: Option 1
IMPLICATIONS OF RECOMMENDATION:
General: Option 1 will see the AAP adopted as Board policy. Having a formal Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan strengthens agricultural policy, provides a framework for future policy work, and sets out specific actions steps.
Page 38 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
REQUEST FOR DECISION
Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan Electoral Area C
Prepared for meeting of: May 14, 2012
Issue Defined
The draft Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan (AAP) was referred out to agencies and local governments in September 2011. As a result of the referral process, comments from two agencies and the Village of Pemberton were received. This report summarizes the comments received, and the revisions that are proposed to address the concerns that were raised.
History
The process to develop a Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan began at the end of 2008 when the Board endorsed the Terms of Reference. Following the Board’s endorsement of the Terms of Reference, funding was granted through the Investment Agriculture Foundation (IAF), a consultant was selected to undertake the project, and work began in the spring of 2009. By the end of 2009 a Phase 1 Report titled “Agriculture Profile” was completed and presented to the community at a public meeting and brainstorming session on issues affecting local agriculture.
A draft AAP was first presented to the SLRD Board in March 2010. Following that there were substantial personnel changes within the planning department that resulted in the AAP process being significantly delayed. In the fall of 2010 work on the AAP was initiated once again, and a refined policy draft was prepared and was used as the basis for an extensive review process with the Area C Agricultural Advisory Committee. In March 2011 the Board resolved that the draft be sent out for agency comments.
In the time since the last draft was considered by the Board, and the preparation of this report, the Ministry of Agriculture provided, for the first time, the completed Pemberton Valley Land Use Inventory. This LUI has been included in the Appendices, and it is anticipated that it will be a valuable resource during the implementation of the plan, as well as for related projects, and future reviews of the AAP.
Current Status
The agency review process is complete, and staff present the current draft as a reflection of the comments received through that process.
Page 39 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
Referral Process
The draft AAP was sent to several agencies. Comments were received from the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, the Ministry of Agriculture, and the Village of Pemberton. The full comments are attached to this report as an appendix. The table below summarizes the comments and provides a brief explanation of the revisions made, or staff response to the comment.
Section Description of Change Comments
Goal 1 Moved objectives 2.2, 2.3 and 2.6 from Previously Goal 1 and Goal 2 were in Goal 2 to Goal 1 the same section, with one list of objectives. This draft pulls out three objectives and moves them under Goal 1, so that now Goal 1 has three objectives, and Goal 2 has four objectives.
Objective 1.1 Minor rewording in opening paragraph no change to content
Action 1.1.1 UPDATED POLICY – to “consider Updated this action. Previously the amending the zoning bylaw as per the action was to support the development Minister’s bylaw standard regarding the of a Minister’s bylaw standard regarding size and siting of non-agricultural residential uses on agricultural land. developments on agricultural land.” The Minister’s bylaw standard is in place now, so this language is updated NOTE: in January 2010 the Board directed to reflect a possible next step. staff to begin a consultation and review process regarding this matter
Action 1.1.2 Inserted “that would apply to lands As per BC Ministry of Agriculture and adjacent to or nearby farmland” Lands (BCAGRI) comments, to clarify
Action 1.1.3 and Separated these into separate actions As per VoP comments 1.1.4 (previously they were both in one action)
Action 1.1.5 Deleted “request the province to delegate As per BCAGRI and VoP concerns authority to local governments to designate agricultural areas as development permit areas for the purpose of regulating form and character, including siting, of residential uses on ALR land.”
Objective 1.2 Minor rewording in opening paragraph no change to content
Action 1.2.2 Added phrase “Any signage within the As per the MoTI comments Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure right of way requires their approval.”
Page 40 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
Objective 1.3 Reworded opening paragraph to soften As per VoP comments tone
Goal 2 Reworded to soften tone, no change to As per VoP comments content
Actions 2.1.2 minor edits for grammar and 2.1.3
Action 2.1.5 Reworded As per BCAGRI comments to avoid using the term ‘lobbying’
Objective 2.2 Minor rewording in opening paragraph no change to content
Action 2.2.5 Reworded to specify that it refers to water As per VoP comments for irrigation
Action 2.3.3 Clarified that it refers to ‘impacts to As per VoP comments agriculture as a result of non-agricultural uses of Crown land’
Action 2.4.7 Added ‘farm animals’ As per VoP comment to add ‘horses’
Objective 5.1 Reworded opening paragraph to soften tone
Action 5.1.2 Reworded to say “work with BCAGRI to BCAGRI explained their limited access extension services as they are resources but confirmed their desire to available.” continue to provide support to communities
Action 5.3.2 Added “such as a farmer’s market” As per VoP comment
Action 6.2.5 Reworded to say “work with MoTI to…” As per MoTI comments
Action 6.3.1 Added “Such signage could also warn As per VoP comments visitors about slow moving vehicles and animals in farm areas.”
Action 6.3.2 NEW POLICY – to “consider collaborating Based on discussion at the Agricultural with the Chamber of Commerce and other Advisory Commission review, and interested organizations to undertake a suggestion from a BCAGRI regional study (and create a report for the public) to Agrologist. In other communities they show the economic contribution of were surprised to see the total agriculture to the community and the net contribution of agriculture, and also to tax benefit of agricultural land.” see the difference in cost/benefit of agricultural land compared to other land uses (ie industrial, residential).
Action 7.1.6 Added “…as per the requirements of the At the request of the BCAGRI Agricultural Land Commission Act,
Page 41 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
Agricultural Land Reserve Use Subdivision and Procedure Regulation and the Minister’s bylaw standard regarding residential uses in the ALR.”
Under DELETED - recommendation that a formal BCAGRI cautioned that they would not Agricultural Plan MOU be developed for signature by likely be able to commit to an MOU due Implementation participating organizations to limited resources. Staff believe that Body heading this commitment may be onerous for many organizations, and suggest that (pg 17) it’s removal does not jeopardize the spirit of the plan, or the call to action described under the Implementation section.
Glossary Added “Working Agriculture” as As per BCAGRI comment “Economically viable agriculture that can support an operator from the proceeds of farming.”
List of Acronyms NEW SECTION added to list acronyms used in the plan
Options
1. Adopt the Plan as presented. 2. Adopt Plan as presented and direct staff to prepare an amending bylaw to the OCP to adopt the AAP as a sub-area plan to the Area C OCP. 3. Refer back to staff for further revisions and analysis.
Analysis of Options
Option 1 – adopt the Plan as presented When this project was originally contemplated, it was envisioned that the Plan would be incorporated into the Area C Official Community Plan as a sub-area plan. Staff believe that shifting the direction of the AAP to become a plan that is simply adopted by the Board, akin to the Trails Master Plan, rather than a sub-area plan of the OCP is advantageous not only for a more timely completion and adoption of the plan, but also in that it allows greater flexibility in the future should amendments or revisions be desired. OCP amendments are still recommended in order to address any policy gaps that exist in the current OCP agricultural policies, and this way those amendments can be undertaken as one of the early implementation steps. Staff believe that adopting the plan independently from the OCP does not compromise the process or the strength of the policies, but simply allows greater flexibility in how the plan is implemented. It is noted that there are several jurisdictions that have adopted AAPs in place that are not sub-area plans, but rather act as a supplement to the OCP, and provide policy direction to the OCP as well as zoning and regulatory bylaws.
This option allows the fastest path to adoption of the plan, and to start implementation.
Page 42 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
Option 2 – Adopt plan as presented and prepare amending bylaws to adopt plan as a sub-area plan to the Area C OCP Should the Board wish to proceed with adopting this plan as a sub-area plan of the OCP, amending bylaws will be prepared and presented for first reading. Following first reading, a formal agency review process can begin and comments and concerns can be addressed before recommending further readings. The benefit to adopting the AAP as a sub-area plan is that the policies are enshrined, and any bylaw enacted or works undertaken after it is adopted must be consistent with the plan. The downside of adopting this as a sub-area plan is that any future amendments to the plan would require an amendment to the OCP.
This option would require more time than option 1, because it will require the formal OCP amendment process to be followed.
Option 3 – Refer back to staff for further revisions and analysis If the Board would like further revisions prior to the draft plan being adopted, staff suggest that specific comments be forwarded to staff in order to ensure that the appropriate revisions are completed.
The timeframe for completion under this option is undetermined, as it would depend on the nature and extent of revisions that are requested.
Attachments Draft Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan
Page 43 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan
Page 44 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
Acknowledgements
The plan was prepared with assistance from Zbeetnoff Agro-Environmental Consulting and Quadra Planning Consultants.
This project was funded in part by the Investment Agriculture Foundation of BC through Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada’s Advancing Canadian Agriculture and Agri-Food (ACAAF) Program.
Agriculture and Agri‐Food Canada (AAFC) is pleased to participate in the production of this Agricultural Area Plan. AAFC is committed to working with our industry partners and the Investment Agriculture Foundation of BC to increase public awareness of the importance of the agriculture and agri‐food industry to Canada. Policies and recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District and not necessarily AAFC’s.
Page 45 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ...... ii Introduction ...... 1 Policy Context ...... 1 The Process ...... 2 Plan Area ...... 3 Vision ...... 4 Guiding Principles ...... 4 Goals, Objectives, and Action Steps ...... 5 GOAL 1: Maintain the integrity of the ALR ...... 5 GOAL 2: Develop mechanisms to maintain the agricultural land base for working agriculture ...... 6 GOAL 3: Coordinate with other users to ensure that the natural advantages of the Pemberton Valley are protected ...... 9 GOAL 4: Diversify agriculture and comply with Seed Potato Control Regulation ...... 10 GOAL 5: Improve the economic viability of farming...... 11 GOAL 6: Increase community awareness of and support for agriculture ...... 14 GOAL 7: Attract new farmers and engage new workers ...... 15 Implementation ...... 16 Agricultural Plan Implementation Body (AIB) ...... 16 Financial Resources ...... 17 Human Resources ...... 18 Next Steps ...... 19 Glossary of Terms...... 20 List of Acronyms used in this Plan ...... 20
Appendix A – Pemberton Valley Land Use Inventory – 2009 (Ministry of Agriculture) Appendix B – Preliminary Market Opportunities Analysis Appendix C – SWOT Findings Appendix D – Selected Maps of Pemberton Valley
~ i ~
Page 46 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
Executive Summary The Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan was initiated by the SLRD in 2008 with the support of the Investment Agriculture Foundation. It is intended to be a Board policy, and to work in conjunction with existing policy documents such as the Official Community Plan, the Regional Growth Strategy, and others to inform future decisions related to agriculture, and provide guidance in decision making and priority setting related to agriculture in the valley.
This report represents the culmination of three phases of work and an extensive stakeholder engagement process including numerous open houses, public meetings, and committee review.
The plan covers all lands within the Agricultural Land Reserve within the SLRD Electoral Area C in the Pemberton Valley, and does not include those lands within the Village of Pemberton or on First Nations reserves.
The policies are informed by several guiding principles and a vision that includes an efficient, agriculture sector, with protected farmland, and a high level of recognition and respect for the value of agriculture to the broader community. The vision further includes a cooperative working environment between and among farms, engaged local markets, local secondary processing, and a balance of both new and continuing operations.
The plan describes 7 Goals, and then lists several objectives and action steps that stem from each goal. The goals are as follows:
1. Maintain the integrity of the ALR. 2. Develop mechanisms to maintain the agricultural land base for working agriculture. 3. Coordinate with other users to ensure that the natural advantages of the Pemberton Valley are protected. 4. Diversify agriculture and comply with Seed Potato Regulations. 5. Improve the economic viability of farming. 6. Increase community awareness of, and support for, agriculture. 7. Attract new farmers and engage new workers.
The last section of the plan looks at implementation, and breaks it down into three key elements: the creation of an Implementation Body, enlisting sufficient human resources, and securing sufficient financial resources. The recommended composition of the implementation body is described, and several suggestions to aid in the securing of financial and human resources are provided.
Lastly, the plan outlines that the next step, successful implementation, requires that opportunities for collaboration, coordination and cooperation be sought across governmental jurisdictions, and among agencies and community organizations.
~ ii ~
Page 47 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
DRAFT Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan P a g e | 1 Squamish-Lillooet Regional District
Introduction The Pemberton Valley agricultural land base consists of about 18,600 acres broken out between private lands (70%), Crown lands (18%) and First Nations lands (12%). The total area of farms consists of about 11,000 acres, almost all of it privately owned. In 2005, a total of about 72 farming units were operating in the Pemberton Valley
Pemberton Valley agriculture is an established community with an international reputation for high quality pest-free seed potato production, largely due to its pristine growing conditions and unique geographic isolation from other growing areas.
The Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan (PVAAP) was initiated by the SLRD in September 2008, and jointly funded by the SLRD and Investment Agriculture Foundation of BC with the purpose of elaborating on the agricultural policies of the Area C Official Community Plan, and providing additional policy direction and recommending specific actions to achieve the stated objectives.
While this plan is intended to be a stand-alone document, it is also intended to be adopted as a policy of the SLRD Board of Directors. As a Board Policy it will inform future decisions related to agriculture, and provide guidance in decision making and priority setting not only for the SLRD but for other organizations in the Pemberton Valley who are interested in undertaking actions to support and sustain agriculture.
Policy Context
Regional Growth Strategy (RGS) The RGS endorses Smart Growth principles, which includes ensuring the integrity of a productive agricultural and forestry land base. In addition, under the Goal to achieve a sustainable economy, one of the strategic directions is to undertake agriculture plans for Lillooet and the Pemberton Valley to provide a basis for new agricultural investment and protection of the ALR.
Area C Official Community Plan (OCP) The Squamish-Lillooet Regional District (SLRD) has adopted an Official Community Plan (OCP) for Area C that identifies several objectives for agriculture:
. To preserve the agricultural land base in the plan area. . To encourage diversification and economic sustainability of the farming community. . To minimize the impacts from non-agricultural development occurring at the edge of farming areas and within agricultural lands. . To accommodate housing that meets the needs of farmers and minimizes impacts on farm land. . To balance the interests of agriculture and protection of the environment. . To contribute to local and regional food security.
Page 48 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
DRAFT Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan P a g e | 2 Squamish-Lillooet Regional District
In addition to the objectives outlines above, the OCP sets out 40 policies related to agriculture. The intention of the PVAAP is to further elaborate on the policies of the OCP, to strengthen the policy position, and to begin to set out a strategy to operationalize the plan.
Area C Zoning Bylaw No. 765, 2002 Under the Area C Zoning Bylaw, all lands within the ALR have been zoned Agriculture (AGR). Within the AGR there is a sub-zone for the lands in the immediate vicinity of Pemberton, called the Pemberton Fringe sub-zone. In this sub-zone, additional permitted uses include a garden nursery, and on parcels 2ha or greater, a second single family dwelling (subject to ALC regulations), a bed and breakfast, and a “horse-riding academy, boarding stable and indoor riding arena”.
Residential density in the AGR is regulated according to parcel size (larger parcels are permitted an additional dwelling, subject to ALC regulations. In addition, there is a maximum floor area for dwellings in the AGR zone and in the Pemberton Fringe sub-zone there is a maximum floor area for horse riding academies, boarding stables and indoor riding arenas. The minimum parcel size in the AGR is 2ha, subject to approval from the ALC.
Energy Resilience Task Force Report The Task Force Report states that in the context of increasing energy costs, it will be “important to bolster the foundations of the food system in order to improve food security. In particular, the foundations of production, processing, packaging and delivery will need to be made more resilient”.
The report contains 21 policies related to agriculture and food systems, many of which are echoed in this plan. Of particular note is the first recommendation, to champion Agricultural Land Trusts to buy land for community food growing and protect in perpetuity as an investment in long-term food security.
Integrated Sustainability Plan (ISP) An ISP is defined as a “long-term planning, developed in consultation with community members, to help the community realize sustainability objectives it has for the environmental, cultural, social and economic dimensions of its identity.” It is anticipated that as the ISP process moves forward, objectives and action steps from various plans will be inventoried and worked into an Action Plan for Sustainability. While the AAP will stand alone as a plan, it is desirable to coordinate objectives and actions from across our policy documents, in an effort to realize opportunities for collaboration and cooperation in achieving common goals.
The Process The Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan (PVAAP) represents a further development of policies in support of agriculture. The specific tasks of the PVAAP process were to:
1. Complete an inventory of lands and crops; 2. Communicate with farmers to discover strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats affecting the local industry; 3. Conduct a preliminary market opportunities analysis for agricultural crops; and 4. Draft policies to address issues and capitalize on opportunities.
Page 49 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
DRAFT Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan P a g e | 3 Squamish-Lillooet Regional District
In order to accomplish those tasks, work was undertaken in three separate phases: 1) the Situation Analysis; 2) identification of Issues and Options; and 3) drafting of the Plan. This report draws on the material gathered under the process, and puts forward policies regarding agricultural issues and opportunities. In the Appendices of this plan one will find the Land Use Inventory, the SWOT Analysis, the Preliminary Market Opportunities Analysis, and also a selection of mapping of the valley.
Plan Area The Plan Area is all ALR lands in Area C between the north end of Pemberton Meadows, and the west end of Lillooet Lake, as shown on Map 1, below. The Plan area does not include lands within the Village of Pemberton or lands in Indian Reserves.
Birkenhead Lake
r ve R i R y a n PembertonL Meadowsi l l o o e t R i v e r M i l l e r C r e e k
Mt Currie Pemberton Legend
Indian Reserve Land Approximate Boundary of Plan Area
5 2.5 0 5 Kilometers This map is for convenience only. Accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. AAP Plan Area ¯ Map 1: Approximate plan area of the Pemberton Valley Agriculture Area Plan
Page 50 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
DRAFT Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan P a g e | 4 Squamish-Lillooet Regional District
Vision
The agricultural land base in the Pemberton Valley is protected, the agricultural sector operates efficiently as a result of appropriate investments in infrastructure, and conditions for working agriculture are maintained and enhanced. All stakeholders are actively working together to protect the Pemberton Valley’s unique natural agronomic advantages, and both residents and visitors are aware of the uniqueness of the valley and the importance of agriculture to the valley. The value and contribution of agriculture is widely recognized and respected as a strength of the local community.
The seed potato and other agricultural sectors have developed cooperative relationships and protocols that facilitate inter-farm management, cropping diversity, and agricultural opportunity and are able to work together to expand agricultural opportunities and maintain necessary seed production conditions.
Local markets are a key to the success of Pemberton Valley agriculture, increasing the economic viability of farming operations and services. Agriculture is supported by expanded local storage, handling, distribution, processing and marketing infrastructure.
Opportunities have been created to make land available for working agriculture and sufficient new participants able and willing to respond to new and continuing agricultural opportunities have been attracted to the industry.
Guiding Principles
Through the planning process for the agricultural area plan; a series of principles to guide the plan have been collaboratively developed and articulated as follows:
1. The existing ALR is to be respected and protected. Exclusions and non-farm uses are generally not supported. 2. Sustainable agriculture is the highest and best use of the ALR and policy will support productive and profitable agricultural use of the ALR. 3. The unique agronomic advantages of the Pemberton Valley are to be protected. 4. Impacts on conditions necessary for seed potato production are to be addressed in promoting the Pemberton Valley. 5. Promoting local markets for local agricultural goods and services is key to a sustainable local agricultural economy. 6. Awareness of the contribution of agriculture by the public, politicians and students must be promoted to develop respect for farming and farmland and to maintain conditions for continued viability. 7. Recruiting new and younger farmers is key to perpetuating the agricultural sector.
Page 51 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
DRAFT Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan P a g e | 5 Squamish-Lillooet Regional District
Goals, Objectives, and Action Steps
Based on the Guiding Principles listed above, the plan is structured around 7 Goals, from which flow a number of objectives and actions.
GOAL 1: Maintain the integrity of the ALR Objective 1.1 – Retain the agricultural production capacity of the ALR
When farmland properties are purchased for rural-residential purposes there is a risk that non- agricultural structures will be situated without due regard to agricultural land use practices or the integrity of the land for agriculture. The resultant impacts on soil and possible fragmentation of fields, etc. are what many would consider ‘avoidable impacts’ on the agricultural production capacity of the land. Development on agricultural lands should be carefully planned to ensure that there are minimal impacts on current and future agricultural activities of the land.
Action Steps The Regional Board will:
1.1.1 Consider amending the zoning bylaw as per the Minister’s bylaw standard regarding size and siting of non-agricultural development on agricultural land. 1.1.2 Consider creating a Development Permit Area for the protection of farming that would apply to lands adjacent to or nearby farmland, and include requirements for screening, buffering, landscaping, fencing, and siting of buildings or other structures, in order to provide for the buffering or separation of development from farming on nearby lands. 1.1.3 Support the permanence of the ALR boundary by generally not supporting applications for subdivision or exclusion. 1.1.4 Discourage the purchase of farmland for non-agricultural uses by generally not supporting ALR non-farm use applications. 1.1.5 Request the province to consider establishing tax disincentives for creating large non-agricultural building footprints on agricultural land.
Objective 1.2 – Maintain the ALR in good agronomic condition
There is concern that if both farm and non-farm land in the valley is not properly managed to control the spread of noxious weeds and other pests that this can create negative consequences for farmland. Particularly, this can lead to the establishment of invasive weeds, higher pest populations, and ultimately lead to increased costs of pest control for working agricultural land.
All land owners are encouraged to maintain their properties so as to prevent the establishment of noxious weeds and pests in the plan area.
Action Steps The Regional Board will:
Page 52 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
DRAFT Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan P a g e | 6 Squamish-Lillooet Regional District
1.2.1 Encourage corridor land owners, such as the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, the PVDD, and CN Rail, to develop a weed management plan that sets out an appropriate mowing schedule to reduce the spread of seeds. 1.2.2 Encourage the placement of signage at trailheads and parking areas to educate recreational users in the risks associated with invasive species, and the best way to ensure they do their part to not spread invasive species. Any signage within the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure right of way requires their approval. 1.2.3 Investigate ways to support local invasive species councils with invasive weed mapping projects. 1.2.4 Work with local organizations to educate land owners about noxious weeds and other invasives and pests, and what the landowner’s responsibilities are in relation to these issues. 1.2.5 Support initiatives for land owners, particularly in the ALR, to maintain their farmland in pest-controlled condition. 1.2.6 Collaborate with the agricultural sector to develop and implement a code of good agricultural practice.
Objective 1.3 – Educate and increase awareness of farm practices for non-farming property purchasers
It may sometimes be the case that farmland is marketed to property purchasers more interested in the recreational and/or rural residential aspect of living in the Pemberton Valley rather than making a living from farming. To help offset non-agricultural pressure it may be helpful to inform purchasers buying farmland primarily for non-agricultural purposes of the scope and nature of agricultural activities so that the non-farm residents do not carry unrealistic expectations with respect to the ‘quiet enjoyment’ of agricultural land.
Action Steps To assist new property owners to adjust to conditions in a farming area, the Regional District will explore opportunities to:
1.3.1 Work with realtors and agricultural community to prepare a ‘Farmland Information Brochure’ that can be given to prospective purchasers to advise them of typical farm activities, and land owner responsibilities with respect to pests, noxious weed control, Seed Potato Control Area Regulations, etc. 1.3.2 Work with agriculture organizations to identify options for new non-farming agricultural land owners to learn how to make their land available for farming by others, particularly for seed potato rotations.
GOAL 2: Develop mechanisms to maintain the agricultural land base for working agriculture Objective 2.1 - Keep the farmland base in working agriculture
It is sometimes suggested that removing the real and perceived financial advantages associated with owning farmland for non-agricultural purposes can be an effective way to ensure that farmland values are determined by working agriculture competing for the land base. In addition,
Page 53 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
DRAFT Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan P a g e | 7 Squamish-Lillooet Regional District
if non-farm property owners are encouraged to make their land available for farming activities, it can help keep the land available for working agriculture.
Action Steps The SLRD will:
2.1.1 Consider requesting the province to implement a taxation classification for rural residential ALR land that does not have Farm Class that assesses and taxes residential land and improvements in the ALR at a residential rate and eliminates any tax subsidy for non-farm uses of ALR land. 2.1.2 Support the establishment of a database to link owners of ALR land with potential renters wishing to farm. 2.1.3 Seek to provide attractive zoning opportunities for non-farm development in non- ALR areas. 2.1.4 Consider requiring that agricultural impact assessments are done as part of the development approval process, to identify the impacts of developments on agricultural lands and operations prior to development, including on non- agricultural farmland uses. 2.1.5 Engage with the Province to encourage them to require that provincially reviewable projects such as independent power projects 1) identify potential agricultural impacts at the project design stage and 2) to create a “no net loss to agriculture” policy for these developments (eg. mitigation be undertaken to protect and/or compensate agriculture where impacts are identified). 2.1.6 Investigate the establishment of an Agricultural Land Trust Fund that could be used to purchase and/or lease agricultural land. 2.1.7 Encourage property owners, perhaps through tax incentives, to amalgamate small parcels of land in the ALR into larger holdings. 2.1.8 Discourage non-farm use on agricultural land, however, where non-farm use is being considered, pursue an approach (e.g. development agreement or amenity zoning) that will create tangible improvements in the conditions for the agricultural sector and will ensure a “net benefit to agriculture”.
Objective 2.2 – Support the agricultural capability of the ALR with adequate infrastructure
While there have been significant improvements made over the years to flood control, drainage and irrigation infrastructure in the valley, there remain opportunities to improve the systems to create more favourable conditions for agricultural productivity and efficiency. Some of the issues that should be investigated include aging infrastructure, condition of existing infrastructure, cross jurisdictional co-operation, and possible changes in capacity that will be created by climate change.
Action Steps The SLRD will explore opportunities to address agricultural infrastructure needs throughout the valley by:
Page 54 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
DRAFT Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan P a g e | 8 Squamish-Lillooet Regional District
2.2.1 Supporting the undertaking of a needs assessment to look at drainage and flood control measures using an agricultural standard, and looking across jurisdictions to find solutions that will support and enhance agricultural lands throughout the valley. 2.2.2 Encouraging collaboration among jurisdictions in the valley, including First Nations, to establish coordinated economic development objectives that will address infrastructure issues such as flood control, that impact agricultural lands. 2.2.3 Supporting the undertaking of a needs assessment to look at water demand and availability. 2.2.4 Seeking opportunities to improve irrigation infrastructure for agriculture, particularly in areas that do not currently have access to irrigation. 2.2.5 Seeking to ensure that water supply infrastructure provides water that is of a quality that is acceptable to farmers for irrigation.
Objective 2.3 – Ensure agriculture is considered in Crown land use decisions
It is important that proposed non-agricultural uses of Crown ALR lands consider the impacts on existing and potential agricultural activities. While it is recognized that conservation and recreation uses are permitted uses within the ALR, such uses require thorough review to ensure that impacts to existing and potential agricultural use are fairly considered.
Action Steps The Regional Board will endeavour to ensure that processes are in place to consider impacts of non-agricultural uses of Crown ALR lands on existing and proposed agricultural activities by:
2.3.1 Requesting agencies with control of Crown ALR to offer Crown ALR grazing leases or other agricultural tenures to Pemberton Valley farmers on lands appropriate for grazing/suitable for farming. 2.3.2 Requesting agencies with control of Crown ALR to perform agricultural impact assessments on all proposals to use Crown ALR for non-agricultural purposes. 2.3.3 Ensuring that if there are to be any adverse impacts on agriculture as a result of non-agricultural uses of Crown ALR lands, that such impacts are mitigated or off-set in favour of agriculture. This could involve both improved infrastructure and/or acquisition of land for agriculture.
Objective 2.4 – Minimize impacts at the agriculture/non-agriculture interface
Edge planning along borders of agricultural areas is an effective method for managing the transition from agricultural to non-agricultural areas and of minimizing impacts related to the agricultural/urban interface. Any encroachment of rural-residential into a farming area is likely to increase the zone of interface between agricultural and non-agricultural property owners.
Action Steps Potential conflicts at the rural-urban interface may be avoided by using appropriate land use planning mechanisms. The SLRD will consider the following initiatives to increase awareness and minimize conflict at the agriculture/non-agriculture edge:
Page 55 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
DRAFT Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan P a g e | 9 Squamish-Lillooet Regional District
2.4.1 Where there is opportunity in conjunction with a Regional District approval, request that sale of property on the non-farm side of the ALR boundary have a notice registered on title informing purchasers of adjacent farming activities and associated sights, smells and sounds. 2.4.2 Request real estate vendors to inform prospective purchasers of ALR parcels that they will be residing in an agricultural area, where agriculture is practiced, and sights, sounds, and smells of agriculture are to be expected. 2.4.3 Explore the possibility of developing a farm bylaw that could regulate activities on both sides of the agricultural/urban interface, with the goal of minimizing and/or mitigating incompatible uses and activities. 2.4.4 Implement buffer guidelines recommended by the ALC. 2.4.5 Create signage to inform non-farming neighbours about where the farming areas are and farm practices are occurring. 2.4.6 Seek opportunities to create an agricultural festival called “Pemberton Farm Week” and use the festival to inform the greater community of farm / non-farm interface issues, and also to provide education and awareness opportunities, to market local farm products, to host specific events that will highlight local agricultural capacity. This could be organized around an existing event such as the Slow Food Cycle. 2.4.7 Work with appropriate Ministries to resolve potential safety issues with slow moving farm vehicles, farm animals, and logging trucks that are sharing Pemberton Meadows Road.
GOAL 3: Coordinate with other users to ensure that the natural advantages of the Pemberton Valley are protected The natural agronomic attributes of the Pemberton Valley are internationally recognized. These unique conditions bestow advantages ranging from “northern vigour” to the absence of invasive species and diseases affecting other growing areas of the continent. Current practices and precautions are inadequate to prevent the inadvertent introduction of invasive pests and disease. As well, precautions are insufficient to prevent the establishment of noxious weeds in the ALR.
The introduction of invasive pests and disease would threaten the agricultural viability of the area and livelihood of farmers. The establishment of these pests would eliminate an agronomic advantage of the Pemberton Valley.
Action Steps The Regional District will encourage the development of a coordinated approach to pest management with agricultural interest groups to ensure that mutually beneficial pest control protocols are implemented. All users of agricultural land in the Pemberton Valley should be engaged in a pro-active manner, and opportunities should be explored to:
3.1.1 Increase public awareness of pest risks through signage in recreational areas, brochures handed out to new property purchasers, supporting initiatives of the Sea to Sky Invasive Species Council (SSISC).
Page 56 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
DRAFT Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan P a g e | 10 Squamish-Lillooet Regional District
3.1.2 Work with commercial users, such as recreation/tourist operations, landscapers, nurseries, and gardeners to provide education on the risks of invasive species, teach pest identification skills, and encourage vigilance in the approach to invasives. 3.1.3 Support the development of ways to assist recreation/tourism operators and recreationists to take precautionary measures with respect to invasive species, such as a ‘wash station’ in town to allow users to hose down their vehicles/trailers and thereby reduce seed spread. 3.1.4 Require recreation/tourism operations/initiatives to develop precautionary practices to protect against invasive pests/ disease/soil erosion as part of a master recreation/tourism plan. 3.1.5 Capitalize on the existing knowledge of farmers to develop a Code of Good Farm Practices that can be used as a resource by farmland owners in the Pemberton Valley.
GOAL 4: Diversify agriculture and comply with Seed Potato Control Regulation Pemberton was the first commercial seed potato area in the world to grow virus-free seed potatoes. Since 1967, the sector has carried out strict production practices, monitoring, inspection and testing, to ensure that Pemberton Valley potatoes remain free of all known viruses, bacterial ring rot and spindle tuber viroid.
Seed potato production is governed by the Seed Potato Act and the Seed Potato Control Area Regulation. Maintaining conditions for seed potato production is vital to the current agricultural viability of the Pemberton Valley and it is important to be cautious when exploring other agricultural opportunities, that such actions will not jeopardize the seed potato sector. The major concerns of the seed potato sector are that 1) precautions are taken to ensure that quarantine pests do not enter the valley, 2) that pest control in organic farming supports the Seed Potato Control Regulation; and 3) that potato growers access to rental lands for crop rotation is not restricted by property owners because of the potato growers use of pesticide.
Action Steps The SLRD supports the principles of the Act, and Regulation, and can seek opportunities to strengthen local bylaws and policies to align with the intention of the Act and Regulations.
It is important to recognize that management of invasive species is more easily managed by prevention rather than treatment, and that certain invasive species are very difficult to manage by any means other than spraying insecticides. In light of this, prevention should be emphasized.
The SLRD will explore opportunities to work with the agriculture sector and provincial agencies to develop a pro-active approach to:
4.1.1 Educate owners and users of Pemberton Valley ALR lands about requirements of the Seed Potato Control Area regulation. 4.1.2 Explore opportunities in the implementing bylaws to support and enhance Seed Potato Control Area regulations.
Page 57 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
DRAFT Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan P a g e | 11 Squamish-Lillooet Regional District
4.1.3 Explore opportunities in the implementing bylaws to support and enhance the regulations of the Noxious Weeds Act. 4.1.4 Communicate implications of quarantine pest introduction on valley agriculture. 4.1.5 Establish and implement a Valley-wide precautionary approach to pests. 4.1.6 Re-evaluate requirements of the Seed Potato Act and Regulations from a pest control perspective. 4.1.7 Support and encourage research on methods of effective pest control in farming areas adjacent to potato farms, public lands, roads, and rights-of-way. 4.1.8 Encourage research projects that will identify pest control practices that might better meet the diversifying needs of the area.
GOAL 5: Improve the economic viability of farming Objective 5.1 – Support agricultural use of land base
When there is high demand for agricultural land for rural residential purposes it can result in higher prices being paid than would typically be affordable for farmers, based on the economic return from conventional agriculture. High land prices and low economic returns can keep farmers out of the market, and can also constrain farmers from expanding their holdings at affordable cost.
Agricultural operators can consider higher land costs only if margins from agriculture increase. Such increases in margins could be from reduced input costs, increased yields or through the production of higher valued crops. In addition, increased diversification on the farm will ensure that economic dips create less risk to the overall farm balance sheet.
Action Steps The SLRD will seek to support farmers in their competition for farmland by exploring opportunities to work with other organizations and agencies to:
5.1.1 Make improvements to increase the agricultural productivity of the land base. 5.1.2 Work with BCAGRI to access extension services as they are available. 5.1.3 Provide farmers with information to take advantage of local food trends. 5.1.4 Assist farmers in orienting themselves to local food markets. 5.1.5 Host local courses and training in new agricultural opportunities. 5.1.6 Investigate options for bulk purchasing of inputs.
Objective 5.2 – Pursue value-added opportunities
There is opportunity for local farmers and agricultural entrepreneurs to process commodities, create specialty items, and add value to products grown in the valley. The increasing inflow of recreationists and tourists promises a steady flow of potential customers seeking to purchase differentiated products that can be manufactured in the Pemberton Valley. The Village of Pemberton is well positioned to support opportunities to create business in the community.
Page 58 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
DRAFT Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan P a g e | 12 Squamish-Lillooet Regional District
Action Steps The SLRD endorses the following key actions that the agriculture sector and/or local government can pursue to provide the greatest potential for supporting local valued opportunities:
5.2.1 Encourage and support innovative value-added opportunities for farmers. 5.2.2 Seek investment, grant, seed capital, and local support to explore options for meat processing (e.g. mobile abattoir) and potato processing (e.g., vodka distillery). 5.2.3 Access small scale food processing technical programs (SSFPA) to “get it right” from the outset. 5.2.4 Conduct annual technical workshops for farmers and those interested in farming, perhaps in conjunction with a Pemberton Valley agricultural fair (e.g. Pemberton Farm Week). Invite speakers to discuss topics of interest to area farmers and the community. 5.2.5 Encourage the creation of an agri-industrial area within the existing urban footprint to centralize agricultural processing. 5.2.6 Include agriculture development in the local Economic Development Strategy. 5.2.7 Seek out other BC communities with strong agri-tourism markets and value added sectors and build relationships to share ideas and experiences.
Objective 5.3 – Pursue local and regional markets
The SLRD encourages local farmers to consider cooperating to capture the local food market to their collective advantage. This could focus on working cooperatively to eliminate redundant marketing costs; developing differentiated food products, promote processing of commodities grown in the valley, and providing high standards of food safety.
Action Steps The SLRD will explore opportunities to work collaboratively with other agencies and organizations to support Pemberton Valley agriculture in local and regional markets by:
5.3.1 Examining the feasibility of a local products marketing cooperative, including bulk purchasing of inputs. 5.3.2 Providing a permanent venue for country sales, such as a farmer’s market. 5.3.3 Investigating coordinated regional facilities for the handling, cooling and transport of valley agricultural products. 5.3.4 Collaborating with PFI and other local organizations to further develop and add value to the Pemberton brand and labeling initiative. 5.3.5 Encourage local chefs and restaurants to develop menus that enable them to purchase the ‘whole animal’ and not leave farmers with odd cuts that are difficult to market. 5.3.6 Work with local chefs and restaurants to further develop and market the Pemberton brand.
Page 59 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
DRAFT Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan P a g e | 13 Squamish-Lillooet Regional District
Objective 5.4 – Develop comprehensive approach to agri-tourism
The Agricultural Land Reserve Use, Subdivision and Procedure Regulation defines agritourism as a “tourist activity, service or facility accessory to land that is classified as farm under the Assessment Act.” Such uses are permitted only subject to meeting specific criteria set out in the Regulation, and if the conditions are not satisfied, approval of the Agricultural Land Commission is required in order for the use to proceed.
Recreation and tourist use of the Pemberton Valley is expected to increase in the future. Agritourism represents an opportunity to increase farm operator revenues from farming by marketing to recreationists and tourists and attracting tourists to the Pemberton Valley for agritourism events. Agritourism also has the potential to be used effectively as a way of interacting with the consumer public and raising the awareness of agriculture.
In order to plan effectively for the nurturing and growth of benefits associated with agritourism, the concerns of all local agricultural interests should be addressed in a systematic manner. Agritourism needs to be coordinated within the farming community to provide broader benefits. Better communication and a policy of inclusion will help to overcome the challenges of tourism in farming areas. Agritourism is perceived as a tool for promoting other objectives of the plan such as increased local marketing and sales, improved farm viability, and increased agricultural diversity.
Action Steps The SLRD supports Pemberton agricultural interests working together to provide a comprehensive approach to agri-tourism that spreads benefits and manages impacts effectively and fairly for the benefit of all, by seeking to:
5.4.1 Communicate with other local governments to share ideas and learn from their experiences about how to successfully promote and manage agritourism. 5.4.2 Promote local food production in agritourism initiatives. 5.4.3 Promote broad based agritourism opportunities. 5.4.4 Encourage the appropriate agencies to consider improvement to transportation corridors to handle agritourism traffic. 5.4.5 Systematically coordinate upcoming agritourism activities with neighbours. 5.4.6 Work with appropriate agencies to develop and implement more flexible regulations to better accommodate small scale agritourism. 5.4.7 Link farmers and agri-tourism events to Whistler tourism. 5.4.8 Promote diversity of agritourism products. 5.4.9 Continue to promote Slow Food Cycle Tours. 5.4.10 Create local food events. 5.4.11 Research new and evolving approaches in other jurisdictions.
Page 60 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
DRAFT Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan P a g e | 14 Squamish-Lillooet Regional District
GOAL 6: Increase community awareness of and support for agriculture Objective 6.1 – Increase agricultural awareness among youth Action Steps 6.1.1 Encourage schools to incorporate agricultural education materials in curriculum. 6.1.2 Encourage schools to develop school gardens. 6.1.3 Encourage school ‘farm days’ that could include tours of local operations. 6.1.4 Encourage schools to develop cafeteria menus that include local food where possible. 6.1.5 Gather and prepare materials such as brochures, reports, studies, and fact-sheets related to agriculture and make them available for reference, perhaps through an agriculture page on the SLRD website.
Objective 6.2 – Increase access to agricultural information and awareness of events and issues Action Steps 6.2.1 Encourage the creation of a regular “Agriculture Events’ page in local papers. 6.2.2 Consider developing an Agriculture web page on the SLRD website that would provide news and events information related to agriculture and provide links to other agriculture information and resources. 6.2.3 Develop interpretive signage for recreational trails to inform users of agricultural issues, and encourage responsible trail use. 6.2.4 Encourage positive relationships and collaboration between trail groups and farmers to work together to protect and preserve farmland and recreational land, and to protect private property rights while also preserving public access to public lands. 6.2.5 Work with the Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure to explore the possibility of posting signage to advise of slow moving vehicles and farm equipment in appropriate areas.
Objective 6.3 – Develop tools to help promote agriculture Action Steps 6.3.1 Work with Village of Pemberton and Chamber of Commerce to explore the possibility of making gateway signage that will identify Pemberton as a farming community (i.e. “Welcome to Pemberton – This is a Farming Community”). Such signage could also warn visitors about slow moving vehicles and animals in farm areas. 6.3.2 Consider collaborating with the Chamber of Commerce and other interested organizations to undertake a study (and create a report for the public) to show the economic contribution of agriculture to the community and the net tax benefit of agricultural land. 6.3.3 Promote farm tours, public workshops and information meetings. 6.3.4 Hold an annual Pemberton Valley agricultural fair that includes a market, exhibits, farm tours, lectures, workshops, dining events, networking opportunities, etc. 6.3.5 Cross-market local products. 6.3.6 Encourage/promote purchasing of local foods at public institutions.
Page 61 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
DRAFT Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan P a g e | 15 Squamish-Lillooet Regional District
6.3.7 Engage regional chefs, restaurants to promote valley agriculture. 6.3.8 Engage local food security groups to promote local food. 6.3.9 Engage Health Authority to promote valley agriculture.
GOAL 7: Attract new farmers and engage new workers While traditionally, replacement of retiring farmers with new farmers has been achieved predominantly within the ranks of farming families, this cannot necessarily be relied upon to meet the numbers required to have a critical mass of farmers. While there is a concern that a poorly targeted farmer recruitment program could contribute to tougher short term economic conditions for farmers locally, the need for replacement is critical in order to preserve the critical mass of farm operators. Farmer recruitment/succession should be promoted through initiatives to support farming families to continue family farms, and also initiatives that support new farmer entrepreneurship and increase access to farmland. These measures would contribute to needed diversification as well as bring new entrants into the sector.
Action Steps The SLRD supports in principle the following key actions intended to provide the greatest potential recruiting new farmers into Pemberton Valley agriculture:
7.1.1 Create incentives for non-agricultural property owners to make their land available for entry level lease farming. Incentives could include leasing arrangements, defining financial arrangements, and increased cost of keeping land out of production. 7.1.2 Facilitate access to farmland held by non-agricultural property owners by supporting the creation of a database that would link owners with leasees. 7.1.3 Coordinate mentorship and apprenticeship opportunities for young would-be farmers with established operators. 7.1.4 Pursue agricultural business and practices training workshops for aspiring farmers. 7.1.5 Pursue financing options to assist low asset new farmers to enter the sector. 7.1.6 Support the building of residences for farm families on family farms to allow and support family farming, as per the requirements of the Agricultural Land Commission Act, Agricultural Land Reserve Use Subdivision and Procedure Regulation and the Minister’s bylaw standard regarding residential uses in the ALR. 7.1.7 Recognize and value the farming knowledge of current farm families as an asset to successful farm operations. 7.1.8 Support the creation of an Agricultural Land Trust that could offer leases to new farmers.
Page 62 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
DRAFT Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan P a g e | 16 Squamish-Lillooet Regional District
Implementation Implementation of the agricultural plan will require effective response in three essential areas:
Implementation body Financial resources Human resources Agricultural Plan Implementation Body (AIB) The implementation of the PVAAP is envisioned as a shared responsibility. The SLRD has a primary role stemming from its authority in terms of regulating land use through the Area C Official Community Plan and bylaws, however many actions require mobilization of both human and financial resources that go beyond the capabilities of the SLRD.
The implementation model for the agricultural plan should ensure that all stakeholders are included and have meaningful access to the implementation processes. Currently, the Pemberton Farmers Institute (PFI) and the Agricultural Advisory Committee (AAC) are active in agricultural affairs in the area.
If formed, an Agricultural Plan Implementation Body would have several functions, including but not limited to:
Prioritizing implementation actions and identifying lead implementation roles and support roles. Developing an annual work plan for implementation. Assisting with coordination of stakeholders. Identifying sources of funding and assisting with funding applications. Providing a forum for all stakeholders to share their concerns and to identify the appropriate organization(s) to address concerns. Being an advocate for agriculture in the Pemberton Valley. Monitoring the progress of implementation of the Agricultural Area Plan and preparing an Annual Report. Reviewing and revising the Implementation Plan every 5 years.
To initiate implementation of the plan, it is recommended that a PVAAP Implementation Steering Committee be formed with membership from the SLRD, Village of Pemberton, Pemberton Farmer's Institute, Lil'wat First Nation, Pemberton Chamber of Commerce, Ministry of Agriculture and Lands, the Pemberton Seed Potato Grower’s Association, and the Pemberton Valley Dyking District. This committee would be charged with developing terms of reference for the implementation body, determining the best format (e.g., a Council, a Coordinating Committee, etc.), membership and mandate (functions).
To assist the Implementation Body, funding could be pursued for a Coordinator. The Coordinator would have appropriate training, qualifications and experience in agriculture and be a capable facilitator and communicator. The individual would need to work with the various interests involved and assist in pursuing financial assistance to implement recommendations. The Coordinator would also develop an annual work plan identifying priorities, responsible organizations and funding requirements.
Page 63 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
DRAFT Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan P a g e | 17 Squamish-Lillooet Regional District
Financial Resources There are several options that can be pursued to generate the financial resources to carry out key high priority items of the plan.
Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Consideration can be given to establishing a joint service between the local jurisdictions (SLRD Area C, Village of Pemberton, and Resort Municipality of Whistler) to raise funds to support and promote agriculture. This could be similar to the one used to fund the Sea-to-Sky Recreation Trails Network and may be suitable for raising resources in a stable, coordinated manner.
Alternatively, the Local Government Act contains provisions for the Lieutenant Governor in Council to incorporate an area as an improvement district, approved by the Board of the Regional District. A Pemberton Valley agricultural improvement district could be organized and empowered to levy and collect taxes for the purpose of promoting agriculture,1 similar to provisions that have enabled incorporation of mountain resort improvement districts in BC.
Grant Funding The Investment Agriculture Foundation (IAF) manages a federal-provincial pool of capital that is well positioned to assist in funding project priorities identified in this plan. It is anticipated that this program will be readily accessible to the AIB through a variety of leveraged funding opportunities supported by the SLRD, BCAGRI and other provincial agencies.
Various federal, provincial and private organizations are available to provide expertise and advice to the Pemberton Valley in lieu of capital contributions. School, social and health programs are also paying more attention to food and nutrition issues and are partnering with agricultural interests.
Pemberton Farmers Institute The PFI is anticipated to become a more active organization specifically tasked with initiating some of the farm level aspects of the plan. This would require the development of a strategy of how to increase its support, membership base, and financial capacity.
First Nations There may be opportunities to pursue, with the Lil’wat Nation, federal agricultural initiatives targeting First Nations. Interest in exploring these opportunities has been indicated and specific well-coordinated proposals may have increased potential for success in the future.
Engaging Local Businesses It is anticipated that local business groups may be engaged (recreation and tour operators, restaurants, chefs) to assist in promoting the agricultural message. This may best be accomplished through interactions with the Chamber of Commerce.
1 See the Local Government Act, Part 23. http://www.bclaws.ca/Recon/document/freeside/--%20L%20-- /Local%20Government%20Act%20%20RSBC%201996%20%20c.%20323/00_Act/96323_25.xml#section729 and the Mountain Resort Association Act http://qp.gov.bc.ca/35th4th/3rd_read/gov10-3.htm
Page 64 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
DRAFT Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan P a g e | 18 Squamish-Lillooet Regional District
Human Resources Human resources need to be enlisted to undertake agricultural area plan tasks. It is envisioned that the expertise of the Ministry of Agriculture and the Agricultural Land Commission will be available on an as needed basis independently of the PVAAP, for specific requests and information needs.
Agricultural Plan Coordinator As discussed above, it is recommended that funding for a Coordinator be pursued. At this point it is premature to recommend whether this person would be a SLRD staff person or working directly for the Agricultural Plan implementation body. This is a decision that should be reviewed by the Implementation Steering Committee, discussed above. The Coordinator would assist in ensuring that the plan is advanced with informed knowledge of the agricultural considerations and communicated to the public and politicians at large. Terms of Reference for the Coordinator position would be determined by the Implementation Body.
Pemberton Farmers Institute (PFI) It is anticipated that a strong case can be made to the Investment Agriculture Foundation (IAF) to support a pilot project in local governance capacity building directly aimed at managing the impacts on agriculture in the Pemberton Valley. The first order of business for the PFI would be to apply for a 3-year AIF grant to expand its agricultural organizational governance capacity.
It is expected that this would include employment of a person in an administrative capacity. This person would be qualified to develop the role of the organization, complete applications for special projects, target high priority items identified in the agricultural plan, convey PFI concerns and positions to the Implementing Committee, and leverage financing received from partners.
In addition to a minimal staff to coordinate the initiatives proposed in this plan, the local agricultural sector should also seek to engage young leaders, particularly by capitalizing on the experience and knowledge of established and successful farmers. Retired farmers can seek opportunities to mentor new farmers. The PFI can also seek opportunities to collaborate with First Nations on agricultural initiatives, and coordinate efforts at obtaining support from other levels of government.
Page 65 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
DRAFT Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan P a g e | 19 Squamish-Lillooet Regional District
Next Steps This Agriculture Area Plan was developed as a living plan that is a reflection of the plan process and ideally provides representation of the vision and goals of the community with respect to agriculture.
The next step in this path is to look at how to take action, and how to move ahead with the implementation tasks described above. Other future tasks could include the development of specific indicators and a monitoring plan, to help gauge the success of the plan over time, and to help coordinate the actions taken in this plan with actions and initiatives throughout the valley and across organizations.
Success will be achieved by seeking opportunities for collaboration, coordination and cooperation across the governmental jurisdictions, and among other agencies and community organizations.
Page 66 of 82 Request for Decision - Pemberton Valley Agricultural Pla...
DRAFT Pemberton Valley Agricultural Area Plan P a g e | 20 Squamish-Lillooet Regional District
Glossary of Terms Agritourism
Agritourism is defined by the Agricultural Land Reserve Use, Subdivision and Procedure Regulation (BC Reg. 171/2002) as a “tourist activity, service or facility [that is] accessory to land that is classified as a farm under the Assessment Act.”
Food Security
According to the website of the World Health Organization, food security is premised on three concepts: food availability, food access and food use. In 1996 the World Food Summit defined food security as existing “when all people, at all times, have access to sufficient, safe, nutritious food to maintain a healthy and active life.” (http://www.who.int/trade/glossary/story028/en/)
Sustainable Agriculture
Broadly speaking, sustainable agriculture is agricultural practices that meet the needs of the present without compromising the needs of the future. The key pillars of sustainability, in relation to agriculture are the ongoing production and availability of food, protection of the environment, and economic viability of both the farm and community.
Working Agriculture
Working agriculture is economically viable agriculture that can support an operator from the proceeds of farming.
List of Acronyms used in this Plan AAC – Agricultural Advisory Committee AAFC – Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada AAP – Agricultural Area Plan ACAAF – Advancing Canadian Agriculture and Agri-Food AIB – Agricultural Implementation Body ALC – Agricultural Land Commission ALR – Agricultural Land Reserve BCAGRI – Ministry of Agriculture and Lands ERTF – Energy Resilience Task Force IAF – Investment Agriculture Foundation ISP – Integrated Sustainability Plan MoTI – Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure OCP – Official Community Plan PFI – Pemberton Farmer’s Institute PVDD – Pemberton Valley Dyking District SLRD – Squamish-Lillooet Regional District SWOT – Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats VoP – Village of Pemberton
Page 67 of 82 Pemberton & District Chamber of Commerce - Grant Request...
chairperson
February
Squamish Pemherton. Box
Dear
The May Chamber
years.)
from Visitor seasonal requests and On The the Village like for Fourism of greatly It Yours
President
Karen End.
is
the
the
behalf
Visitor
219. Pemberton
to prospective Visitor
hoped
(hairperson
-September
the
Visitor
‘uly,
request visitors
enquiries
appreciated.
of
oss. for
27.
BC
operation.
Chamber
Lillooet
funds
Pemberton of
that B.C..
Centre
Susie
information.
Centre
2012
the
and
Centre
that
to
&
while
businesses
ihe
Board
30 VON
and
Gimse:
our
a
District Gimse. www
Regional
with
of the
was
Summer
On
each
area
business Visitor
and
or
you
Commerce. 2L0,
pembertonchamber
Squamish
of
a
an
SLRD.
staffed
T
year
Commerce
give
$2500
P0 but
Directors
he are
District,
a
to
Pemberton
Career
Chamber
Centre
for
erage
in
Box
requests
your our
Last
with
budget
for
potential
Lillooet
(Find
valley.
370,
of
financial year
there
the
Student
would
of
students
the
is
continue
District
deliberations
2012
attached
the a
Pemberton,
Regional
are Pemberton
investors
corn
The
total
not
first
grant
support
season.
2-3
funded
majority
operates
be
of
all
infopernbertonchamber Chamber
line
visitor
phone
from
18.738
able
District
year
and
you
for
& of
The
through
BC
residents
District
contact
the
to
of
Service long
this
information
will calls
Chamber & visitors
operate
these
consider
Pemberton
VON
of
service,
even
seriously
grants
District
per
for Commerce
Chamber
Canada
in
requests
2L0
were
though
many
day
without
our
provides
continuing
from Your from
Visitor
community.
consider
and recorded
as
‘visitors,
of
corn
are
the
the the
continued
substantial
well
Commerce
the
a
forwarded
centre
Visitor
previous Village,
service
their
the
same
at
as
new
the
importance
substantial
support
support from
Centre
residents
in
not
funding
Centre. I
SLRD
eleven
would
to
only
mid
the
of
is
is
Page 68 of 82 ¾
PEMBERTONVISITORCENTREFINANCIALREPORT2011
REVENUES
Tourism BC $10,000.00 Villageof Pemberton $4,500.00 Squamish LillooetRegionalDi: $2,500.00 Service Canada Grant $2,987.00 Pemberton Chamber Funds $8,564.21 RackingFees $350.00 SIae of Merchandise $2,224.00 Map Revenue $9,300
OutstandIng Revenue (Map P $300.00 Page 69 of 82 TOTALREVENUE $40,725.21
EXPENSES Grant Request... Grant - Staff Salaries $22,679.81 Insurance $519.38 Map Costs $5,775.84 Hydro(4.5mo) $316.35 Tel. (4.5 mo) $1,299.17 Courier/Postage $628.82 Uniforms (name tags) $29.40 OfficeSuppplies $200.00 CleaningSupplies $78.46 Repairs $5,433.92 Maintenance $1,569.44 VCExpenses $347.35 VCPurchases $1,847.27
Pemberton & District Chamber of Commerce Commerce of Chamber District & Pemberton TOTALEXPENSES $40,725.21 Page 70 of 82 of 70 Page
PFMRFRTON VISITOR CENTRE COMPARISONS 2000-2fl1 I 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 ADMINISTRATION #Hours 1100.5 1102.75 1128.5 1107 1200 1237 1164 1238 1140.5 1144 1278 1205 #Partles 7605 6553 9098 8790 7053 9067 9684 9391 10,742 9610 10,641 9395 #Vlsltors 18,285 16,253 22,717 20,537 14,782 18,054 20,639 19,110 23,292 22,089 21,752 18,738 VISITOR ORIGIN (Top 5) BC BC BC BC BC BC BC BC BC BC BC BC Europe Europe Europe Europe Europe Europe Europe Europe Europe Europe Europe Europe Other Us/Mexi Washington Otherlis/Mexic Washington OtherUS/Mexic OtherUS/Mexi OtherUs/Mexic OtherliS/Mexic OtheruS/Mexi OtherUS/Mexi OtherUS/Mexic OtherUS/Mexicc Washington Other Canada Washington Alberta Other Canada Washington Other Canada Other Canada Other Canada Other Canada Other Canada Other Canada Alberta OtherUS/Mexi Other Canada OtherUS/Mexh Washington Other Canada Washington Washington Asia/Australia Washington Washington Asia/Australia INFO REQUESTED (Top 5) Adven/Recreat Adven/Recreat Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Attractions Accommodatlo Accommodatlo Accommodatio Adven/Recreat Adven/Recreati Attractions Adven/Recreati Adven/Recreati Adven/Recreat Adven/Recreat Adven/Recreati Adven/Recreat Attractions Attractions Attractions Attractions Accommodatio Adven/Recreat Attractions Attractions Attractions Attractions Attractions Transportation Transportation Transportation Adven/Recreati Parks Attractions Parks Parks Accommodatio Parks Accommodatio Accommodatio Parks Parks Parks Parks Accommodatio Parks Accommodatio Accommodatioi Parks Accommodatio Parks Parks Accommodation NIGHTS IN COMMUNITY Same Day 2945 3547 4650 4175 3783 4224 5144 5805 5433 4795 6633 6123 might 1806 2198 2639 2575 1677 1393 1781 1396 1788 2149 1690 1318 2 nights 675 103 571 458 132 420 358 168 544 639 252 164 3 nIghts 292 33 103 104 22 94 43 48 127 146 65 40
RV’s 379(Sept1Oct, 1510 1472 1400 1326 1174 1448 1424 1779 1677 1545 1773
Request... Grant - Commerce of Chamber District & Pemberton Lillooet Secondary School - Dry Grad Celebration
LILLOOET SECONDARY SCHOOL P.O. Box 760 Lillooet, B.C. VOK 1V0
Phone: (250)2564274 Principal: Ms P. Teskey Fax: (250) 2564275 Vice Principal: Mr. T. Mountain Website: geelsq.${f-* +s.=_Ej, l+Sl
Emai l qqn q.qnlq n$q e " : friee&ty #,sy.$" S-?4, hs " se ! W. +"d ?j. A €A
April 15,2012 ro: SAuam\sh Li\\ooe-t Regione\ Dislricrt
Re: Graduation Class of 2012
T\e2012 Grad Class of Lillooet, B.C. is proudly excited to be holding Dry Grad Celebrations this year. This will be the fourth dry grad in over 18 years. This year the Grad Class has decided to try a different approach to their Dry Grad Celebrations by hosting a trip to Playland in Vancouver. This means that their Celebrations will require them to be 100% drug and alcohol free for two weekends.
Dry Grad will be held on Safurday, June 16 at Playland in Vancouver. The Grad Class has rented a bus which will be leaving Lillooet Secondary School at 6:30am and will arrive home at 9:30pm. Prom will be held on Friday, June22 from 8:00pm to 2:00am at the Lillooet Memorial Curling Rink and Grad Ceremonies will be on Saturday, June 23 at Lillooet Secondary School.
Your contributions of funds, certificates and/or goods can be used to make this year's event one of the best ever. Your support is an excellent way to demonstrate your high regard for student achievement and strong community values. As well, you will help the Grad class demonstrate that graduation can be celebrated in a safe and responsible manner.
Your generous contribution will be used to offer incentives and prizes for the event. We will be pleased to accept any type of donation. Cheques can be made payable to "school District 74" and other items can be mailed or dropped off to the school's office, or we will be pleased to pick up your donation.
The School District will issue tax receipts for cash and new in-kind donations in excess of $25.00. If you would like a tax receipt please complete a form for cash donation or for gift in-kind and return it to Kate Wright at Lillooet Secondary. These forms are available on the School District w-ebsite r,' you pick 'i *siilJ.hq1it or can them up in the offrce at Lillooet Secondary School.
Shouldhould you have any questions or cornments, please contact Tracy Holden at liitril.i,;i: gj:;:!i.:.l-!t or (250) 256-0151. Thank you for your kind attention and consideration.
Sincerely, fi**l* ll"U Brandon Holden Grad2012, Director
Page 71 of 82 Lillooet Secondary School - Dry Grad Celebration
GOLD TRAIL SCHOOL DISTRICT 74 (CCRA Registration No.
Cash Donation Form
Donor Name: (Please Print) Mailing Address: PostalCode: Phone No: Fax No: Emait:
1. What is the amount of your cash gift? (Please make your cheque payable to the School Distict No. 74 and aftach to this form.)
2. Do you want your gift directed to a specific school, program, or project? tr Yes I No, please use the gifi where it is most needed, lf yes, please specify where you want your gift directed:
3. Do you require a charitable donation receipt? n Yes trNo
4. Do you wish to remain anonymous? tr Yes trNo
Donor Signature Date
PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO: School District No. 74 (Gold Trait) P.O. Bag 250,400 Hollis Road, Ashcroft, BC VOK {A0 June 2008
Page 72 of 82 Lil'wat May Day Rodeo
Ij.41
April 27, 2012
Squamish-Lilloeet Regional I)istrict P.O. Box 219 1350 Aster Street Pemberton, BC VON2L0
Dear Sir/Madam:
The Mount Currie Band is writing to request assistance from Squamish-Lilloeet Regional District in the form of prizes, supplies, cash donation, and or other resources for the annual 2012 Lil’wat May
Day Rodeo held at the Mount Currie Rodeo Ground in Mount Currie, British Columbia on May I9’, 2Oth& 21t, 2012.
The LiFwat May Day Rodeo is a three day event aimed at amateur First Nation rodeo stars from British Columbia and the rest of North America. The event hosts barrel racing, calf roping, steer wrestling and bull riding. Other activities such as foot races, cow milking, watermelon eating and other children’s activities make the event fun for the whole family. We expect approximately 50 participants and 300 spectators to attend each day.
In total, hosting the Rodeo is expected to cost approximately $21,900.00. Your contribution will help ensure an enjoyable and safe three day event. Any financial sponsorship will go toward upkeep of the rodeo grounds and assist in ongoing annual events. Sponsors will receive prominent advertising display at the event. Any financial surplus from the Rodeo goes to Recreation Committee and Youth Events.
This program will be a success and we hope it will promote positive attitudes that will continue throughout the year. Thank you for your consideration of this request. I hope you will contact us to express your support for this initiative. Cheques can be made out to “Mount Currie Band”. If you have any additional questions or need more information, feel free to contact Michelle Thevarge (604) 894 6115 or [email protected].
Sincerely,
Chief Lucinda Phillips Lil’wat Nation/Mount Currie Band
p I4:i] E 144-41 N
Page 73 of 82 Bridge River Valley Economic Development Society (BRVEDS...
April 24, zor2
Squamish-Lillooet Regional District
Attention: Dir. Debbie Demare, Area A Director
Bridge River Volley Econamit Dear Dir. Demare, Development Saciety $ yon are aware, on November 12, 2ou the membership of the Bralorne- Bridge River Community Association ( g gRVCe) Wvy!&J i lt qq { i ut €ty s 4 e v. c {} met (25 people) and by special resolution (motion), {2s0}238-2s34 unanimously passed: b r.i dgg il!,e_Lv i Jl€y@ s ryf€jlg.1;1 General Delivery "That Gold Bridge, B.C. the Bralorne Bridge River CommunityAssociation be VOK 1PO dissolved and become part of an umbrella organization, initially run by the Bridge River Valley Economic Development Society with the understanding that a Bralorne community advisory committee will be formed and give direction to the Bridge River Valley Economic Development Qociety regarding anlthing that originally the responsibility of this BBRVCA. "
The reasons for the group deciding this included: 8.R.V.E.D.S..... "lack of interest and participation in the BBRVCA over the last ro years "Encouraging and assisting in attended the AGM - "3_people in October, the only meeting the promotion of economic held prior to that was June 2o1o development in the upper "board members of BBRVCA (and any non-profit) have legal Bridge River Valley responsbiliities including a duty of care ensuring they act in the best interest of the society and assets. The board members 2o1o-11and zorr-rz could not commit to this. xassets orruned by the BBRVCA not being managed, and in fact impossible to be managed properly (again a legal issue) by 3 people *finances of the society in very poor condition *purposes of the society not being accomplished
The-reasons the group decided to try the umbrella society model: *as resolution from special meeting says, the Bralorne CommunityAdvisory Committee, through its terms of reference, retains responsibility for management of the assets and activities such as recreational, community, athletic as well as financial performance to budget
Page 74 of 82 Bridge River Valley Economic Development Society (BRVEDS...
*the umbrella board will provide legal oversight and assistance (professional etc) where possible and thus take the "official" load off of the residents working on the BCAC so th"y move forward with goals related to the Hall, Ski Hill, Ball Diamond and other activities"an related to their purpose "the umbrella board contains current 4go/oBralorne residents on it currently and it is very likely that this umbrella board will continue to have a significant number of Bralorne residents on it
Since this time, a Terms of Reference for the Bralorne Advisory Committee of the Bridge River Economic Development Society have been created and approved by both the committee and the Board of Directors of BRVEDs. The Bralorne Community Advisory Committee is functioning, meeting regularly and laying out goals, objectives and budget with the assistance and coordination of BRVEDs.
The BRVEDs Board of Directors is now wishing to move forward with the legal aspects of this consolidation. These aspects include, in chronological order:
1. Transfer of properties (Bralorne Community Hall, Bralorne Ball Diamond) into BRVEDs ownership 2. Payment of Properly Tax 3. Transfer of Ski Hill Tenure to BRVEDS 4. Formal paperworkfor dissolution of BBRVCA
The BRVEDs Board of Directors have sought advice from a lawyer and an accountant on howto proceed as there are other mechanisms including amalgamation that couldbe used. Based on their advice the BRVEDs Board of Directors have chosen to stay the course and proceed with the dissolution of BBRVCA as the most straight forward and least costly approach.
BRVEDS is requesting funding to support this process:
1. Legal fees for property transfers - $z,ooo 2. Property Transfer Tax - $z,ooo 3. Other Fees: Tenure Transfer, Insurance, etc - $5oo 4. Contingency andAdministration by BRVEDs - $45o Dir. Demare we know you are very aware of the current stafus and trust you will support this funding application.
Sincerely,
Bruce Simon, President Bridge River Valley Economic Development Society
Page 75 of 82 Bridge River Valley Economic Development Society (BRVEDS...
Bralorne Community Advisory Committee Committee Terms of Reference In accordance with bylaws and policies of the Bridge River Valley Economic Development Society the Bralorne Community Advisory Committee directs: i. the operations of specific services including the Bralorne Community Hall, the Bralorne Ball Diamond and the Sunshine Mtn Ski Hill and Lift Line Strip ii. the efforts to fulfill mandates related to social, athletic, recreational and other community opportunities in Bralorne
Primary Committee Responsibilities 1.Election of officers: a chairperson and secretary 2. Following the models, procedures and guidelines established by the Bridge River Valley Economic Development Society, the committee is responsible for making any hiring or contract recommendations to the executive, assuring that clear directions are given through written job descriptions, conducting personnel performance appraisals, and, where necessary, making recommendation to the executive for termination of employment and/or contracts. 3. Scheduling and publicizing 6 meetings per year
The general purpose of meetings is ongoing review of operations and progress, including financial performance to budget. Committee meetings are open to the public; presentations will be received at the beginning of any scheduled committee meeting. 1. Reporting to the BRVEDs Executive by: i. submitting copies of the minutes of committee meetings within ten days of the meeting. ii. attendance by chair or designate at scheduled Executive meetings when requested. 2. Formulation of policies to direct the operation of the service and presentation of new policies to the executive for information and/or approval by the membership. 3. Participation in planning processes for future directions of the service based on the perceived needs of the Bralorne Community.
Public consultation In order to ensure opportunity for community consultation, committees shall: 1. Assure the posting of regular meeting times on the www.bridgerivervalley.ca website so community members may attend as observers or, by prior arrangement, to make presentations. 2. Host meetings in an appropriate public venue. 3. Report regularly to the BRVEDS executive and to the BRVEDS membership. 4. Make minutes publicly accessible online on www.bridgerivervalley.ca 5. On issues of significant community impact, committees shall also ensure the community is informed through articles, flyers, posters, neighborhood meetings and/or other available media, well in advance of the meeting at which the issue will be discussed and/or decided.
Page 76 of 82
4th Annual Longboard Event, Brittannia Beach
ph.
Vancouver,
202-550
Lee
Please
parking
best
Goat
and
nature
with
We
and
Logistics,
include.
Co-coordinator
Detailed
Ministry
region.
benefit
spectators
2012
Our
currently
lucky May
location
Association.
regularly
I
the
Hello.
VON
Pemberton,
Squamish-Lillooet April
P.O.
am
604.630.3815
Cation
anticipate
then
300 4 th
ways
primary
a
Ridge
25-27h
writing
we Box
2L0
to
contact
of
mobile
2.
Annual
local
to
East Additional
spectators
Insurance,
leave.
planning
continue
in
the
of 2012
will
parameters.
to
Volunteers,
one
219.
and
BC.
2009, is
-
ith
Health,
direct
BC
event
iciop/aai1.cini
business,
goal
7th
from
The
your
take
where
less unit
us
side
will
Ministry
Longboard
1350
and
Like
V5T
Ave.
with
2010
event
is
at
has
than
to
additional
agency
9am-Spm.
people
spectators
for
ONLY
Safety/First
set
correspondence
the
the
Regional
the
we
our
in
be
Aster
1N7
any
been
Hay
the
provide
out
and
Coastal
100
past
Britannia
is
on safety
have
of
current
unfamiliar
weekend.
being
today
concerns
to
to
E
iransportation
protection Sircet
site
2011.
passed
cars
years
measures
make
improve
tend
parked
District
cm
of
The
quality
for
Aid,
health
scale
planned
for
to
in
our
Beach
We
we
to
the
on
ask
event
sure
or Britannia
is
this
We
Event
for
cycle
with
participant.
found
and
a’
and
to
being safety
questions entire
recreation
Authority
to
for
emergency
event
the have
Community
the
on
will
not
discourage
diligently
the
Litter/Recycling.
and
support
through.
Route.
the
last
signage
with
Ministry
for
event.
looking
also
he
Beach
logistics
at
the
uppermost
3
our
you
any
identical
and
and
spectators
Squamish
years
Britannia
hired Participation,
of
vehicles
People
athletes.
and
refine
and
given
may Association.
drug
our
the to
of’
to
of
and
be
a
Transportation
expend
a
have
BC
event.
the
have
Medical to
and
our
section
respectful
time.
show
and
FD,
volunteer
we
I3each
can
We
events
Museum
Additionally
location.
being
alcohol
operations
regarding
make
We
the
in
Epcor
Parking,
penetrate. expect
Due
up
Categories
of
First
201
Community
held
local
are
for corresponding
Copper
of
to
sure
greeter”
of
2.
consumption
One
Utilities,
Special
currently
Response
a
150
the
the
at
we
residents.
Mining.
Traffic
this
couple within
Page 77 of 82
we
to
the
shoulder
slow
participants
feel
direct
detailed
Drive
event.
aim
are
same
Events
RCMP,
the
hours
‘very
Control
paced
planning
Team
the to
on
In
by of Electoral Area Directors Committee Draft Meeting Minutes...
Electoral Area Directors Committee Meeting Minutes April 10, 2012;a10:30 AM SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton BC
In Attendance: Committee: D. Demare, Chair (Area A); M. Macri (Area B); ; S. Gimse (Area C); M. Freitag (Area D)
Staff: L. Flynn, CAO; P. DeJong, Director of Administrative Services (Recording Secretary); K. Needham, Director of Planning & Development; K. Salin, Planner
1 Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 10:32 A.M.
2 Approval of Agenda
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the agenda be approved as circulated. CARRIED 3 New Business
3.1. March 2012 Monthly Building Report
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the March 2012 Monthly Building Report be received. CARRIED
3.2. Select Funds Report
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Select Funds Report be received. CARRIED
3.3. Request for Decision - Whitecap Resorts Ltd (McGillivray Pass Lodge)
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
1. THAT a Notice on Title be registered against District Lot 8446 Lillooet District, pursuant to the Community Charter, Section 57, as the required inspection has not been satisfactorily completed.
Page 78 of 82 Electoral Area Directors Committee Draft Meeting Minutes...
Page 2 of 5 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area Directors Committee meeting, held on Tuesday, April 10, 2012 in the SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton, BC.
2. AND THAT further information regarding this Notice on Title may be inspected at the offices of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District, located at 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton, BC, between the hours of 8:00 am and 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday, except Statutory Holidays. CARRIED K. Needham and K. Salin left the meeting at 10:47 A.M.
3.4. Information Report - Gas Tax Funding
Director Freitag left the meeting at 11:32 A.M.
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Information Report - Gas Tax Funding be received. CARRIED It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board;
THAT staff develop two grant applications under the General Strategies Priorities System Fund for a Pemberton North water system and for the Bralorne sewer system. CARRIED
3.5. Update Report - Highline Road, Skutnik v. Her Majesty the Queen et al
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT the Board continue to monitor the legal proceedings as a bystander and seek reinstatement of road maintenance funding from the Ministry of Transportation & Infrastructure. CARRIED 3.6. CAO Verbal Update
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the CAO Verbal Update be received. CARRIED 4 Correspondence Requesting Action
4.1. Pemberton & District Chamber of Commerce - Grant Request for Pemberton Visitor's Centre
THAT a letter be sent to the Pemberton & District Chamber of Commerce stating that Chair Gimse is requesting a meeting with Chamber President Karen Ross to discuss the Chamber’s grant request for the Pemberton’s Visitor Centre.
Page 79 of 82 Electoral Area Directors Committee Draft Meeting Minutes...
Page 3 of 5 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area Directors Committee meeting, held on Tuesday, April 10, 2012 in the SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton, BC.
CARRIED
4.2. Bralorne Pioneer Museum - Return of Roofing Funds
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the $2,000 allocation of Area A Select Funds for repair of the Bralorne Pioneer Museum roof be reversed. CARRIED 5 Correspondence for Information
5.1. Southern Interior Beetle Action Coalition - Minutes of February 22, 2012 Board Meeting
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Southern Interior Beetle Action Coalition Board Meeting minutes of February 22, 2012 be received for information. CARRIED 6 Confirmation and Receipt of Minutes
6.1. Electoral Area Directors Committee Draft Meeting Minutes of March 12, 2012
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Electoral Area Directors Committee Meeting Minutes of March 12, 2012 be approved as circulated. CARRIED 7 Business Arising from the Minutes
None
8 Items of Late Business
8.1. Request for Decision - Use of Area C Select Funds to Finance Repair of the Devine Transfer Station Gate
It was moved and seconded:
THAT up to $850.00 be allocated from Area C Select Funds to perform gate repairs at the Devine Transfer Station. CARRIED Director Freitag returned to the meeting at 11:57 A.M.
8.2. McGillivray Creek Road – Public Highway Designation It was moved and seconded:
THAT the McGillivray Creek Road – Public Highway Designation correspondence from B. Pekonen be received. CARRIED
Page 80 of 82 Electoral Area Directors Committee Draft Meeting Minutes...
Page 4 of 5 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area Directors Committee meeting, held on Tuesday, April 10, 2012 in the SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton, BC.
It was moved and seconded:
THAT B. Pekonen be invited to appear as a delegation at an Electoral Area Director’s meeting.
CARRIED
8.3. Regional District of North Okanagan – Annexation Impact Study Funding Request
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Regional District of North Okanagan – Annexation Impact Study Funding Request be received.
CARRIED It was moved and seconded:
THAT staff prepare a letter to the Chair of the Regional District of North Okanagan ("RDNO") asking for clarification of the Terms of Reference for the Annexation Impact Study for which the RDNO is seeking financial contributions from interested Electoral Areas province-wide. CARRIED
8.4. Ministry of Forests, Lands & Natural Resource Operations - Power Ltd. License
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Ministry of Forests, Lands & Natural Resource Operations letter notifying of a five (5) year waterpower investigation license granted to Flash Power Ltd. be received. CARRIED The meeting recessed at 12:05 P.M. The meeting re-convened at 12:35 P.M.
8.5. Funding for the District of Squamish Skateboard Park
It was moved and seconded:
THAT it be recommended to the Regional Board:
THAT the Regional District provide a letter of support for the application to the Whistler Blackcomb Foundation for funding for lighting at the District of Squamish Skateboard Park. CARRIED
Page 81 of 82 Electoral Area Directors Committee Draft Meeting Minutes...
Page 5 of 5 of the minutes of the Squamish-Lillooet Regional District Electoral Area Directors Committee meeting, held on Tuesday, April 10, 2012 in the SLRD Boardroom 1350 Aster Street, Pemberton, BC.
9 Electoral Area Directors Committee Closed Meeting
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the Committee close the meeting to the public under the authority of Section 90(1)(a) & (c) of the Community Charter. CARRIED
The meeting was closed to the public at 12:40 P.M. and P. DeJong left the room.
The meeting re-opened to the public at 1:25 P.M.
10 Adjournment
It was moved and seconded:
THAT the meeting be adjourned. CARRIED
The meeting adjourned at 1:26 P.M.
D. DeMare, Chair P. DeJong, Secretary
Page 82 of 82