Combine Public Input.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Combine Public Input.Pdf Amber Virkler From: Angela Whitfield <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 1, 2020 9:23 AM To: CCB Regulations Subject: Comment on Proposed Regulations RC025, RP016 MMNV2 Holdings Please see the below comments defined by section for the proposed regulations. Thank you for this opportunity to provide comments. 1.125 Can the different “Lots” also be described in grams. Items in the seed to sale tracking system must be in grams according to training. 1.165 Can Production Run also be described in grams. Items in the seed to sale tracking system must be in grams according to training. 1.245 Is an immature cannabis plant less than 8” tall and 3” wide? For the purposes of the seed to sale tracking software, a cannabis plant is considered “vegetative” and no longer “immature” once it was reached 8” tall and 3” wide. 6.010 Can “one ounce” of usable marijuana be expressed in grams. One ounce is actually 28.3g but I understand the state has defined one ounce to be 28 grams. Can this be explicitly stated? Also mentioned in section 12.010. 6.080 Section 3: if we can acquire seeds from anyone how can these be tracked in the seed to sale tracking system if the supplier does not have seed to sale tracking software? Currently we have no way to introduce seeds into the seed to sale tracking software. All new plants must come from another plant or be transferred from another license. 6.135 Quarterly reporting is currently reported on the 30th of the month for the three previous months. Ex: Jan, Feb, March reporting is due April 30th. Due to harvesting and curing schedules, it would be impossible to fully capture the entire month of March by April 15th. Curing schedules can take up to 21 days before product is fully cued and ready to package. Reporting by April 15th would lead to completely inaccurate harvest data. 9.040 Section 3. Guidance was provided by the department on common items and understood shelf life of those items. Any exception to these understood lives would require testing by the manufacturing facility. Will a similar memo be issued by the Board? 10.035 Section 3 mentions that all components must be stored 6 inches off the floor. 9.030 states “fifteen centimeters”. Can the units system in the regulations please be unified to avoid confusion? 12.010 While tincture is called out separately here, it is packaged and treated as an edible in the seed to sale tracking software. The single package limit for tincture versus edibles are very different. Can more clarification be given on how to package tincture in the seed to sale tracking software? 1 12.035 Can it please be stipulated that the serving size statement is not required for concentrated cannabis product and is only required for edible products. Serving sizes are not defined and are not required to be defined for concentrates so have a serving size statement on these labels is incompatible. 13.015 Section 4, the distributor must updated the manifest to accurately depict any delays in arrival times, any route change, or any new driver information. The originating establishment cannot be responsible for knowing, or entering this information in the seed to sale tracking software. Angela Whitfield Production Manager MedMen.com NOTICE: This message is intended only for the named recipient and may contain confidential, proprietary and/or legally privileged information. Any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply email, and delete this message and any attachments immediately. 2 Amber Virkler From: Marla McDade Williams <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, June 1, 2020 9:25 AM To: CCB Regulations Subject: Re: Proposed Regulations of the CCB Thank you for providing these draft regulations. Will they replace the regulations in NAC Chapter 453A and 453D in whole? Sign up for our free weekly newsletter To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. Strategies 360 MARLA MCDADE WILLIAMS Senior Director C 775.315.4728 O 702.800.2100 F 702.728.2750 CARSON CITY: 810 E. 5TH STREET CARSON CITY, NV 89701 LAS VEGAS: 10801 W CHARLESTON BLVD STE 420 LAS VEGAS, NV 89135 STRATEGIES360.COM From: Medical Marijuana <[email protected]> on behalf of Nevada Department of Taxation, Cannabis Compliance Board <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2020 5:25 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Proposed Regulations of the CCB Please see attached memo regarding the proposed regulations of the Cannabis Compliance Board. A reminder notice will go out again on Monday morning. - Cannabis Compliance Board To unsubscribe from the MEDICALMARIJUANA list, click the following link: http://listserv.state.nv.us/scripts/wa.exe?TICKET=NzM3NjA0IG1hcmxhbXdAU1RSQVRFR0lFUzM2MC5DT00gTUVESUNBT E1BUklKVUFOQRX5rvbh3ItN&c=SIGNOFF 1 Amber Virkler From: Savino Sguera <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 10:52 AM To: CCB Regulations; Marco Troiani Subject: Comments on proposed CCB regualtions Greetings. Please see comment below. ******************************************************************************** Savino Sguera Comments on proposed CCB regulations Page 101, 11.055.b (4) Alpha-terpinolene is incorrect terminology. It should be written as "delta-terpinene" or "terpinolene". ********************************************************************************* -- Savino Sguera Chief Science Officer, Digamma Consulting +1 (631) 834-9227 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited 1 Amber Virkler From: Dennis Gutwald <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 9:03 PM To: CCB Regulations Subject: Propose Regulation section 2.040(1) and (3) seem to say the same thing unless I am missing something. Dennis Gutwald | Partner McDONALD CARANO 2300 West Sahara Avenue | Suite 1200 Las Vegas, NV 89102 P: 702.873.4100 | D: 702.257.4517 C: 702.807.9862 BIO | WEBSITE | V-CARD ® MERITAS PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL: This message originates from the law firm of McDonald Carano LLP. This message and any file(s) or attachment(s) transmitted with it are confidential, intended only for the named recipient, and may contain information that is a trade secret, proprietary, protected by the attorney work product doctrine, subject to the attorney-client privilege, or is otherwise protected against unauthorized use or disclosure. This message and any file(s) or attachment(s) transmitted with it are transmitted based on a reasonable expectation of privacy consistent with ABA Formal Opinion No. 99-413. Any disclosure, distribution, copying, or use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient, regardless of address or routing, is strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in error, please advise the sender by immediate reply and delete the original message. Personal messages express only the view of the sender and are not attributable to McDonald Carano LLP. 1 MEMO To: State of Nevada Compliance Board From: Anansi Enterprise LLC – (Tim Eli Addo & Kofi Forkuo-Sekyere) Date: June, 6, 2020 Re: Recall Procedures for Cannabis in Nevada Nevada should be proactive in its approach for strengthening recall procedures for contaminated cannabis products. Increasing strength of lab testing is an important step for guaranteeing consumer safety. However, stronger testing needs to be paired with ways for warning the public of contaminated cannabis products. Establishing an effective cannabis recall program now will help ensure Nevada’s gaming industry can safely create revenue share models for cannabis. The gaming and tourism industries will seek to profit from another potential lucrative revenue stream as cannabis get closer to federal legalization. Furthermore, the Proposed Final Regulations of the Cannabis Compliance Board does not address how contaminated cannabis products should be recalled or recorded. Regulation 6 of the Proposed Final Regulations of the Cannabis Compliance board does not address how contaminated cannabis products should be recalled or recorded. Regulation 10 of the Proposed Final Regulations of the Cannabis Compliance board does not address how contaminated cannabis products should be recalled or recorded. Regulation 11 of the Proposed Final Regulations of the Cannabis Compliance board does not address how testing facilities should respond during a recall for contaminated cannabis products. Regulation 13 of the Proposed Final Regulations of the Cannabis Compliance board does not address how distributors should respond during a recall for contaminated cannabis products. Anansi Enterprise is prepared to provide recall procedures for each step of the cannabis supply chain (sellers, producers, distributors, testing facilities). Policy Issue: The current method the Department of Taxation uses to notify the public of recall is ineffective in notifying all the parties involved. The lack of notification to affected parties can be fatal, especially since medicinal cannabis patients may already suffer from a compromised immune system. Nevada needs to be equipped with a method of notification and containment for potential recalls on cannabis products. Public safety should be the highest priority for cannabis regulators This memo is not written in fear that an issue may happen. Fatalities from contaminated cannabis have already happened in two states.
Recommended publications
  • Section Spotlight: Board of Governors Approves Formation of Cannabis Law Section
    SECTION SPOTLIGHT Board of Governors Approves Formation of Cannabis Law Section BY RIANA DURRETT, ESQ. In September 2019, the WHO IS INVOLVED? State Bar of Nevada’s Board In addition to many esteemed of Governors approved the members of the Nevada bar who formation of the Cannabis signed onto the petition, the Law Section. While this may Executive Board includes: seem like a natural result of Nevada’s legalization of Alicia Ashcraft, chair ─ For medical and adult-use cannabis more than 20 years, Ashcraft sales, approval of the section has represented corporate and didn’t happen overnight. business clients engaged in highly Here is a summary of regulated industries in Nevada how we got here and what to before a multitude of agencies and expect going forward: municipalities. She represents and guides clients through corporate, regulatory and governmental HOW WE GOT HERE processes to actualize their In March 2016, several entrepreneurial vision. From attorneys petitioned the Board previous experience, serving as of Governors for approval of a the chair of the Administrative Law Section for five years, Marijuana Law Section. These Ashcraft saw how important the support of a bar section is to attorneys were already involved in practice area, especially an emerging, ever-evolving area of representing cannabis businesses the law. and saw the benefit of a bar section to the practice area. However, that Tisha Black, vice chair ─ Black has been practicing in the petition was ultimately denied. areas of corporate and real estate law for nearly 25 years. Undeterred and committed She enjoys all manner of law related to small and mid-size to the creation of a bar section business finance, structure, operation, mergers and sale.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Decline of Cannabis Prohibition the History of Cannabis in the UN Drug Control System and Options for Reform
    TRANSNATIONAL I N S T I T U T E THE RISE AND DECLINE OF CANNABIS PROHIBITION THE HISTORY OF CANNABIS IN THE UN DruG CONTROL SYSTEM AND OPTIONS FOR REFORM 3 The Rise and Decline of Cannabis Prohibition Authors Dave Bewley-Taylor Tom Blickman Martin Jelsma Copy editor David Aronson Design Guido Jelsma www.guidojelsma.nl Photo credits Hash Marihuana & Hemp Museum, Amsterdam/ Barcelona Floris Leeuwenberg Pien Metaal UNOG Library/League of Nations Archives UN Photo Printing Jubels, Amsterdam Contact Transnational Institute (TNI) De Wittenstraat 25 1052 AK Amsterdam Netherlands Tel: +31-(0)20-6626608 Fax: +31-(0)20-6757176 [email protected] www.tni.org/drugs www.undrugcontrol.info www.druglawreform.info Global Drug Policy Observatory (GDPO) Research Institute for Arts and Humanities Rooms 201-202 James Callaghan Building Swansea University Financial contributions Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP Tel: +44-(0)1792-604293 This report has been produced with the financial www.swansea.ac.uk/gdpo assistance of the Hash Marihuana & Hemp Museum, twitter: @gdpo_swan Amsterdam/Barcelona, the Open Society Foundations and the Drug Prevention and Information Programme This is an Open Access publication distributed under (DPIP) of the European Union. the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which of TNI and GDPO and can under no circumstances be permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction regarded as reflecting the position of the donors. in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. TNI would appreciate receiving a copy of the text in which this document is used or cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting a Marijuana Licence in Nevada
    Getting A Marijuana Licence In Nevada Phonematic and irreligious Templeton anglicizes his varicocele unsheathe sick notedly. Pasted Pip faradize underground, he sunks his major-generals very shapelessly. If toadyish or mocking Durward usually mails his papoose wends translucently or repose unjustifiably and unwarrantedly, how irreplevisable is Wilek? Las vegas can not serve as marijuana in a nevada state of the link in arizona for no limitations for Workers businesses anxious as Nevada marijuana permit. Step 1 in the proficient of medical marijuana qualification Register online with the Nevada Medical Marijuana Patient Cardholder Registry Step 2 get a rec Icon 2. Board in las vegas is getting a rediculous situation. How to layout a Marijuana Dispensary in Nevada FindLaw. Many pertinent diseases, in nevada gets smarter about getting through his or his or municipal government. Medical Marijuana Doctor in Nevada. They on get approval and a medical marijuana card ahead waste time before. Benefits of a Medical Marijuana Card Las Vegas ReLeaf. Do in nevada state licensed distributors, and getting a marijuana licence in nevada. For patients seeking to legally obtain a Nevada Medical Marijuana Card. If trout were considering HelloMD for your cannabis recommendation. Nevada Marijuana Laws Nevada Dispensary POS Software. Nevada Medical Marijuana Card Dr Green Relief Marijuana. Cardholder Registry process making obtaining your Nevada Medical Marijuana Card easier than ever. At marijuana in compliance board, get info on the two members of. How yet Would It Cost and Open a Dispensary in Nevada. The short answer are NO your Nevada Medical Marijuana Card text not. Start in nevada gets smarter about getting a lot of citizens to get this template yours, ceo of cannabis.
    [Show full text]
  • Mystic Holdings Inc./NV Form 1-A/A Filed 2020-01-03
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 1-A/A Offering statement under Regulation A [amend] Filing Date: 2020-01-03 SEC Accession No. 0001493152-20-000153 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER Mystic Holdings Inc./NV Mailing Address Business Address 4145 4145 CIK:1790320| IRS No.: 813431472 | State of Incorp.:NV | Fiscal Year End: 1231 WAGON TRAIL AVE WAGON TRAIL AVE Type: 1-A/A | Act: 33 | File No.: 024-11093 | Film No.: 20506838 LAS VEGAS NV 89118 LAS VEGAS NV 89118 SIC: 2834 Pharmaceutical preparations 646-286-9070 Copyright © 2020 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document An offering statement pursuant to Regulation A relating to these securities has been filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. Information contained in this Preliminary Offering Circular is subject to completion or amendment. These securities may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted before the offering statement filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission is qualified. This Preliminary Offering Circular shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor may there be any sales of these securities in any state in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful before registration or qualification under the laws of any such state. We may elect to satisfy our obligation to deliver a Final Offering Circular by sending you a notice within two business days after the completion of our sale to you that contains the URL where the Final Offering Circular or the offering statement in which such Final Offering Circular was filed may be obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Ianthus Capital Holdings, Inc
    iAnthus Capital Holdings, Inc. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 Management’s Discussion and Analysis For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 (In thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless stated otherwise) Company Overview iAnthus Capital Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”, or “ICH”, or “iAnthus”) is one of the largest Multi-State Operators (MSOs) in the United States, providing investors with diversified exposure to the regulated cannabis industry. We develop, own and operate, what we believe to be, the best-in-class licensed cannabis cultivation, processing and dispensary facilities and we offer our innovative branded cannabis products in the United States. Through our subsidiaries, we currently own and/or operate 21 dispensaries and 13 cultivation/processing facilities throughout the eastern and western regions of the United States and distribute our cannabis products to over 100 dispensaries. Under our existing licenses, interests and contractual arrangements, we have the capacity to own and/or operate up to 68 dispensaries and up to 15 cultivation/processing facilities, and manufacture and distribute our cannabis products in 11 states with an aggregate population of approximately 121 million. Our multi-state operations encompass the full spectrum of medical and adult-use cannabis enterprises, including cultivation, processing, product development, wholesale-distribution and retail. Our cannabis products include flower and trim, products containing cannabis flower and trim (such as pre-rolls), cannabis infused products, and products containing cannabis extracts (such as vape cartridges, concentrates, wax products, oils, tinctures, topical creams and edibles). We are an innovative leader in the burgeoning regulated cannabis industry in the United States and we are committed to creating a distinctive customer retail experience at our branded stores nationally and a portfolio of branded cannabis products recognized both in the United States and around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Important Dates in Hemp History 10,000-Year History of Marijuana Use in the World
    Important dates in Hemp History 10,000-year History of Marijuana use in the World 8,000+ BCE Use of hemp cord in pottery identified at ancient village site dating back over 10,000 years, located in the area of modern day Taiwan. 6,000 BCE Cannabis seeds and oil used for food in China. 4,000 BCE Textiles made of hemp are usedina. in China and Turkestan. 2,737 BCE First recorded use of cannabis as medicine by Emperor Shen Neng of China. 1,500 BCE Cannabis cultivated in China for food and fiber. Scythians cultivate cannabis and use it to weave fine hemp cloth. 100 BCE First evidence of hemp paper, invented in China. 100 Imported hemp rope appears in England. 105 Legend suggests that Ts'ai Lun invents hemp paper in China, 200 years after its actual appearance (see 100 BCE above). 300 A young woman in Jerusalem receives medical marijuana during childbirth. 570 The French queen Arnegunde is buried with hemp cloth. 500-600 The Jewish Talmud mentions the euphoriant properties of Cannabis. 850 Vikings take hemp rope and seeds to Iceland. 900 Arabs learn techniques for making hemp paper. 1271-1295 Marco Polo brings cannabis to Europe. 1300 Ethiopian pipes containing marijuana suggest the herb has spread from Egypt to the rest of Africa. 1533 King Henry VIII fines farmers if they do not raise hemp for industrial use. 1549 Angolan slaves brought cannabis with them to the sugar plantations of northeastern Brazil. They were permitted to plant their cannabis between rows of cane, and to smoke it between harvests.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation of NCS Cannabis Survey Results For
    Nevada County, CA Survey Results of Cannabis- Related Questions 2017 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA About NRC . 20 years conducting survey research for local government . Wrote the books on citizen surveying . Industry pioneers . Long-term partnerships with ICMA and NLC . Charter members of AAPOR Transparency Initiative About The National Citizen Survey . Community Livability Residents . Community Characteristics Private Communities Community- are partnerships based . Governance sector among... organizations . Participation Govern- ment The NCS & Nevada County . First-time participant in The NCS . Scientific sample of 1,800 households . 545 returned surveys; 32% response rate . ±4% margin of error Online Expanded Open-ended Geographic response sample question comparisons option Extra page of In-person Next Steps questions presentations Workshops Level of Support for Retail Sales of Cannabis To what extent do you support or oppose each of the following types of retail sales of cannabis in Nevada County? Strongly support Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose Medical cannabis 54% 20% 9% 17% Recreational cannabis 29% 25% 8% 38% Level of Support for Future Presence of Cannabis To what extent would you support or oppose each of the following in the future in Nevada County? Strongly support Somewhat support Somewhat oppose Strongly oppose Regulation of cannabis advertising 49% 25% 7% 20% Indoor cannabis cultivation facilities 25% 29% 14% 33% Retail cannabis stores 29% 25% 9% 37% Cannabis being an economic driver
    [Show full text]
  • Ianthus Capital Holdings, Inc
    iAnthus Capital Holdings, Inc. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 Management’s Discussion and Analysis For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 (In thousands of U.S. Dollars, unless stated otherwise) Company Overview iAnthus Capital Holdings, Inc. (the “Company” or “iAnthus”) is one of the largest Multi-State Operators (“MSOs”) in the United States, providing investors with diversified exposure to the regulated cannabis industry. The Company develops, owns, and operates, what it believes to be, the best-in-class licensed cannabis cultivation, processing, and dispensary facilities, and the Company offers innovative branded cannabis and cannabidiol (“CBD”) products in the United States. Through its subsidiaries, the Company currently owns and/or operates 27 dispensaries and 13 cultivation/processing facilities throughout the United States and distributes cannabis and CBD products to over 200 dispensaries and 1,500 retail stores, respectively. Under the Company’s existing licenses, interests, and contractual arrangements, the Company has the capacity to own and/or operate up to 68 dispensaries and up to 15 cultivation/processing facilities, and manufacture and/or distribute its cannabis products in 11 states with an aggregate population of approximately 121 million. Incorporated in British Columbia, Canada in 2014, the Company became the first licensed multi-state cannabis operator in the United States to publicly trade on the Canadian Securities Exchange (the “CSE”) in 2016. iAnthus’ multi-state operations encompass the full spectrum of medical and adult-use cannabis enterprises, including cultivation, processing, product development, wholesale-distribution, and retail.
    [Show full text]
  • Dispensary Facility Final Score the Following Spreadsheet Reflects the Final Scores for All Dispensary Applicants
    Dispensary Facility Final Score The following spreadsheet reflects the final scores for all Dispensary applicants. Due to the size of the Dispensary applicant pool, DHSS is still preparing spreadsheets that reflect the level of detail in final score/rank that was provided for all other facility types. The Department expects to have this information posted the week of February 7. Congressional Location Zip District GIS Final Score (Sorted High to Low by License/Certification Applicant Entity Name Location Street Location City Location State Code Confirmed Congressional District) Status VMO-Ops, Inc. 3420 IOWA AVE SAINT LOUIS MO 63118 1 1705.09 Approved BeLeaf Medical LLC 6036 DELMAR BLVD SAINT LOUIS MO 63112 1 1651.91 Approved GF Wellness S. Grand LLC 3737 S GRAND BLVD SAINT LOUIS MO 63118 1 1645.04 Approved COMO HEALTH LLC 11088 NEW HALLS FERRY RD FLORISSANT MO 63136 1 1615.53 Approved FP4-Broadway LLC 8542 N BROADWAY SAINT LOUIS MO 63147 1 1610.83 Approved Agri-Genesis LLC 6407 MICHIGAN AVE SAINT LOUIS MO 63111 1 1610.44 Approved BeLeaf Medical LLC 2734 LAFAYETTE AVE SAINT LOUIS MO 63104 1 1609.14 Approved FP2-Natural Bridge LLC 4451 BROWN RD BERKELEY MO 63134 1 1598.50 Approved Heya St. Ann Retail II LLC 10417 SAINT CHARLES ROCK RD SAINT ANN MO 63074 1 1597.02 Approved TCAppliCO LLC 3230 PARKER RD FLORISSANT MO 63033 1 1596.60 Approved V3 Mo Vending 2, LLC 7766 N LINDBERGH BLVD HAZELWOOD MO 63042 1 1579.32 Approved COMO HEALTH LLC 5501 CHIPPEWA ST SAINT LOUIS MO 63109 1 1573.39 Approved 6662 Delmar SL, LLC 6662 DELMAR BLVD STE A UNIVERSITY
    [Show full text]
  • Cannabis Life Sciences Files Lawsuit Against in Good Health Inc
    March 9, 2020 Cannabis Life Sciences Files Lawsuit Against In Good Health Inc. The complaint was filed after the Massachusetts-based dispensary allegedly refused to complete the sale of its business to CLS LAS VEGAS, NV / ACCESSWIRE / March 9, 2020 /CLS Holdings USA, Inc. (OTCQB:CLSH) (CSE:CLSH) ("CLS" or the ''Company''), a diversified cannabis company operating as Cannabis Life Sciences, announced today that it has filed a complaint against In Good Health, Inc. (IGH), a vertically integrated cannabis business in Brockton, Massachusetts, after it allegedly refused to complete the sale of its business to CLS. The agreement to acquire IGH was originally announced in November 2018, but after IGH allegedly withheld financial documents, refused in-person visits and attempted to change terms of the acquisition documents, CLS filed the complaint claiming IGH breached its obligations to CLS, among other things. As the plaintiff, CLS is seeking the court declare that IGH must comply with the terms of the acquisition documents as well as award it monetary damages. "We entered into this agreement in good faith and are disappointed that we were unable to reach our intended outcome," said Jeffrey Binder, Co-founder & CEO of CLS. "Despite this pivot, CLS is well positioned to not only scale its business within the Nevada cannabis market, but also to capitalize on other cannabis opportunities." The Nevada market is projected to be worth nearly $980 million by the end of 2022 according to information provided by Canaccord Genuity's US equity research team. CLS owns the award-winning Oasis Cannabis dispensary, located near the Las Vegas strip, and the rapidly growing City Trees brand, available in 75% of all Nevada dispensaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Meeting of the Assembly Committee on Judiciary
    MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY Eightieth Session March 11, 2019 The Committee on Judiciary was called to order by Chairman Steve Yeager at 9:05 a.m. on Monday, March 11, 2019, in Room 3138 of the Legislative Building, 401 South Carson Street, Carson City, Nevada. The meeting was videoconferenced to Room 4406 of the Grant Sawyer State Office Building, 555 East Washington Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada. Copies of the minutes, including the Agenda (Exhibit A), the Attendance Roster (Exhibit B), and other substantive exhibits, are available and on file in the Research Library of the Legislative Counsel Bureau and on the Nevada Legislature's website at www.leg.state.nv.us/App/NELIS/REL/80th2019. COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Assemblyman Steve Yeager, Chairman Assemblywoman Lesley E. Cohen, Vice Chairwoman Assemblywoman Shea Backus Assemblyman Skip Daly Assemblyman Chris Edwards Assemblyman Ozzie Fumo Assemblywoman Alexis Hansen Assemblywoman Lisa Krasner Assemblywoman Brittney Miller Assemblywoman Rochelle T. Nguyen Assemblywoman Sarah Peters Assemblyman Tom Roberts Assemblywoman Jill Tolles Assemblywoman Selena Torres Assemblyman Howard Watts COMMITTEE MEMBERS ABSENT: None GUEST LEGISLATORS PRESENT: Assemblywoman Ellen B. Spiegel, Assembly District No. 20 Minutes ID: 452 *CM452* Assembly Committee on Judiciary March 11, 2019 Page 2 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Diane C. Thornton, Committee Policy Analyst Bradley A. Wilkinson, Committee Counsel Linda Whimple, Committee Secretary Melissa Loomis, Committee Assistant OTHERS PRESENT: Riana Durrett, Executive Director, Nevada Dispensary Association Melanie Young, Executive Director, Department of Taxation Jorge Pupo, Deputy Executive Director, Marijuana Enforcement Division, Department of Taxation Will Adler, representing Silver State Government Relations; and Scientists for Consumer Safety Krystal Saab, General Counsel, Nevada Organic Remedies LLC; and The Source Leighton Koehler, General Counsel, MM Development Company, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada County 2017 Citizen Survey
    Nevada County, CA Technical Appendices DRAFT 2017 2955 Valmont Road Suite 300 777 North Capitol Street NE Suite 500 Boulder, Colorado 80301 Washington, DC 20002 n-r-c.com • 303-444-7863 icma.org • 800-745-8780 The National Citizen Survey™ Contents Appendix A: Complete Survey Responses .......................................... 1 Appendix B: Benchmark Comparisons ............................................. 25 Appendix C: Detailed Survey Methods ............................................. 34 Appendix D: Survey Materials ......................................................... 39 The National Citizen Survey™ © 2001-2017 National Research Center, Inc. The NCS™ is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA. NRC is a charter member of the AAPOR Transparency Initiative, providing clear disclosure of our sound and ethical survey research practices. The National Citizen Survey™ Appendix A: Complete Survey Responses Responses excluding “don’t know” The following pages contain a complete set of responses to each question on the survey, excluding the “don’t know” responses. The percent of respondents giving a particular response is shown followed by the number of respondents (denoted with “N=”). Table 1: Question 1 Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Nevada County: Excellent Good Fair Poor Total Nevada County as a place to live 41% N=217 53% N=286 6% N=30 0% N=1 100% N=535 Your neighborhood as a place to live 47% N=252 43% N=233 9% N=46 1% N=4 100% N=536 Nevada County as a place to raise children 35% N=162 48% N=218
    [Show full text]