DOCSLIB.ORG

Cooperative Breeding Behavior

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FRONTISPIECE. This is a reproduction of an original watercolor by George M. Sutton painted in 1952 as an illustration for the book, Georgia Birds, written by Thomas D. Burleigh and published by University of Oklahoma Press. The original paintings for the book were given in friendship to Herbert Stoddard and are part of the Stoddard Collection at Tall Timbers Research Station & Land Conservancy. ‘‘When I made this painting, the nuthatches were not moving through the pine tops in noisy family groups, as they often do, but nesting quietly. This pair had a nest in a small hollowed-out cypress knee placed for them on a fence post. I looked a long while before finding exactly the right shortleaf pine branch for the picture. I wanted the branch, as well as the birds, to be interesting.’’ Published by the Wilson Ornithological Society VOL. 119, NO. 1March 2007 PAGES 1–150 The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 119(1):1–8, 2007 COOPERATIVE BREEDING IN THE BROWN-HEADED NUTHATCH JAMES A. COX1,3 AND GARY L. SLATER2 ABSTRACT.—We monitored two color-marked populations of the Brown-headed Nuthatch (Sitta pusilla) for Ն5 years and collected data on survival, dispersal, territoriality, and cooperative breeding. Adults (n ϭ 284) were sedentary, maintained long-term pair bonds, and had higher apparent annual survival (66–78%) than previously reported. Territories monitored (n ϭ 347) contained up to five adults; the percentage of territories containing Ͼ2 adults averaged ϳ20% but varied widely. Most groups with Ͼ2 adults consisted of a breeding pair and a male helper related to at least one breeding adult (n ϭ 8), but several exceptions were noted. The presence of helpers did not improve nest productivity. Apparent annual survival for females was lower than apparent survival for males in one population and may have influenced cooperative breeding. In the other population, apparent survival was similar between males and females. We suggest food resources and other environmental factors may have influenced cooperative breeding in this setting. Received 19 January 2006. Accepted 21 July 2006. Cooperative breeding in the Brown-headed that inhabits open pine (Pinus spp.) forests in Nuthatch (Sitta pusilla) has received little at- the southeastern United States and the Baha- tention since the behavior was first described mas. Populations have declined steadily by Norris (1958). Presumably non-breeding throughout much of the species’ range (Sauer adult nuthatches spend large amounts of time et al. 2005) as a result of habitat loss from assisting in nest construction, feeding nest- human development and habitat degradation lings, and defending territories (Norris 1958, through fire suppression and logging (With- Thompson 2000), but recent studies of coop- gott and Smith 1998). The species also has erative breeding in this species are limited to exhibited range contraction in some regions two unpublished theses (Slater 1997, Thomp- (e.g., South Florida and Missouri), and With- son 2000) and a study based on 15 territories gott and Smith (1998) noted that nuthatches (Miller and Jones 1999). disappeared from some areas before the en- The Brown-headed Nuthatch is a primary dangered Red-cockaded Woodpecker (Picoi- cavity-nesting species (McComb et al. 1986) des borealis; U.S. Department of Interior 2003) disappeared from those same areas. Ac- cordingly, the Brown-headed Nuthatch has 1 Tall Timbers Research Station, 13093 Henry Bead- el Dr., Tallahassee, FL 32312, USA. been designated a species of management 2 Ecostudies Institute, P. O. Box 703, Mount Vernon, concern in several evaluations (Hunter et al. WA 98273, USA. 1993, Carter et al. 1998, U.S. Department of 3 Corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected] Interior 2002), and the Bahamian subspecies 1 2 THE WILSON JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY • Vol. 119, No. 1, March 2007 (S. p. insularis; Bond 1931) is thought to be glades. Nuthatches disappeared from ENP in highly imperiled (Smith and Smith 1994, the early 1940s apparently as a result of ex- Hayes et al. 2004). tensive logging (Robertson and Kushlan Characteristics of social breeding systems 1984), and data collected here stemmed from have been used to develop management pro- a reintroduction program initiated in 1997. grams for some cooperative breeders that have Most prescribed burns in BCNP and ENP undergone population declines (Walters et al. were conducted during the early wet season 1992, Mumme and Below 1999). Information (May–Jun) at 3 to 5-year return intervals. on cooperative breeding in the Brown-headed Fieldwork and Data Analysis.—Area Nuthatch could have a similar role and also searches were initiated in February to locate broaden our understanding of social breeding territories and find nests. Nests were identified systems (Boland and Cockburn 2002); how- by worn or freshly exposed wood at cavity ever, data regarding the extent and frequency entrances, observing birds excavating cavities, of cooperative breeding, gender of auxiliary or by finding completed nests with eggs or adults, territory establishment and mainte- young. Nest locations were geographically nance, and adult and natal dispersal are gen- referenced using hand-held global positioning erally lacking (Norris 1958, Withgott and systems. Dispersal distances, nest displace- Smith 1998). ments, and territory densities were estimated The objectives of our study were to (1) using ArcView (ESRI 1998) and the straight- quantify and compare demographic parame- line distance between nest locations. ters, population densities, and characteristics Nests were visited every 3–4 days to as- of cooperative breeding between two popula- certain status and gather information on adults tions of Brown-headed Nuthatch in Florida, associated with nests. Nest height at TTRS (2) develop hypotheses for factors influencing generally was Ͻ3 m and nesting status was cooperative breeding in this species, and (3) monitored using step ladders, flash lights, and consider how our information regarding co- dental mirrors. In south Florida, nest height operative breeding and other life history traits averaged Ͼ10 m and status was monitored us- may contribute to population conservation and ing behavioral observations (typically Ͻ30 management. min/visit). A breeding attempt was defined as the presence of eggs or behavioral cues indi- METHODS cating nesting was underway (used for tall Study Areas.—We studied nuthatches at Tall nests). Timbers Research Station (TTRS; 30.66Њ N, Nestlings were banded 13–16 days after 84.22Њ W) in north Florida (2001–present) and hatching at TTRS by removing the front of at two sites in south Florida (1998–2003): Big nesting cavities using a small saw. The cavity Cypress National Preserve (BCNP; 26.03Њ N, face was secured after banding using wood 81.20Њ W) and Everglades National Park putty, staples, and masking tape. A single fed- (ENP; 25.37Њ N, 80.59Њ W). TTRS encom- eral band was affixed to nestlings. All adults passes 1,630 ha and is dominated by upland were color banded. The height of nests in pine habitats consisting primarily of loblolly South Florida precluded banding of young, (Pinus taeda) and shortleaf pines (P. echina- and data on dispersal for second-year (SY) ta). Dominant trees are Ͼ100 years old, and birds and nestlings stemmed exclusively from prescribed burns are conducted from March to the TTRS population. We compared produc- April at two-year return intervals. Historically, tivity between pairs and cooperative groups upland forests at TTRS were dominated by within populations using (1) the number of longleaf pine (P. palustris), but the original nestlings banded per nest (TTRS) and (2) the forests were cleared for agriculture many de- number of fledglings counted on at least two cades ago (Frost 1993). In south Florida, the visits (south Florida) less than two weeks after BCNP site is associated with an old-growth young left the nest. slash pine (P. elliottii var. densa) forest sur- Most adults were captured using mist nets rounded by a cypress (Taxodium sp.) mosaic. placed near nests, but a few individuals were ENP contained even-aged slash pines inter- lured into mist nets using recorded vocaliza- spersed with hardwood forests and grassy tions of nuthatches or Eastern Screech-owl Cox and Slater • COOPERATIVE BREEDING IN BROWN-HEADED NUTHATCH 3 TABLE 1. Data for color-marked populations of the Brown-headed Nuthatch in Florida. Study area North Florida South Florida Study length (years) 5 6 Territories monitored 152 195 Territories with helpers (%)a 22.7 Ϯ 11.4 17.3 Ϯ 16.1 Maximum group size 5 4 Territories with nests (%)a 85.2 Ϯ 9.2 83.2 Ϯ 22.4 Adults banded 148 136 Females 66 57 Males 62 57 Unknown 20 22 Nestlings banded 246 SYb in natal territories 8 SYb Dispersed 8 Apparent annual survivalc Females (%)a 66.1 Ϯ 5.3 68.7 Ϯ 13.1 Males (%)a 77.8 Ϯ 4.7 69.3 Ϯ 15.8 a Mean Ϯ SD. b Second Year (SY) individuals banded as nestlings and recaptured the next breeding season. c Estimates obtained from Program MARK (White and Burnham 1999). (Otus asio). Gender was assigned based on the calizations, copulation, incubation, and dom- presence (female) or absence (male) of a inance (Norris 1958) were used to categorize brood patch on breeding birds, behavioral ob- breeding status either as breeding adult or an servations of color-banded birds (e.g., copu- auxiliary helper; however, individuals de- lation), and presence of a cloacal protuberance scribed as helpers may have been breeders (male; Norris 1958, Pyle 1997). Wing length (Richardson et al. 2001). was used to assign gender for some SY help- Apparent adult survival was estimated with ers captured at TTRS if other traits were Program MARK (White and Burnham 1999) equivocal. Wing length averaged 2.5 mm lon- using observations of color-banded adults dur- ger for males than females among individuals ing subsequent breeding seasons (Feb–Jul).
Recommended publications
  • Florida State University Libraries

    Florida State University Libraries

    )ORULGD6WDWH8QLYHUVLW\/LEUDULHV 2018 Using a Call-Response Occupancy Survey with Brown-headed Nuthatches (Sitta pusilla) to Evaluate the Biological Species Concept Heather Levy Follow this and additional works at DigiNole: FSU's Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES USING A CALL-REPONSE OCCUPANCY SURVEY WITH BROWN-HEADED NUTHATCHES (SITTA PUSILLA) TO EVALUATE THE BIOLOGICAL SPECIES CONCEPT By HEATHER LEVY A Thesis submitted to the Department of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with Honors in the Major Degree Awarded: Spring 2018 ! Heather Levy FSU EAOS Honors Thesis Using a Call-Response Occupancy Survey with Brown-headed Nuthatches (Sitta pusilla) to Evaluate the Biological Species Concept Abstract The status of the endangered Bahama Nuthatch (Sitta insularis) as an independent species is being debated. The Bahama Nuthatch currently is listed as a subspecies of the Brown-headed Nuthatch (Sitta pusilla), even though the two differ in morphology, song, genetic characteristics, and range. According to the biological species concept, if two populations of the same species are unable to vocally recognize one another, then the two populations would not be able to interbreed, inferring two distinct species. Birds generally react more aggressively to vocalizations of conspecifics, or of the same species, than those of non-predatory heterospecifics, or of a different species, because two members of one species are in closer competition for mates, resources, and territories. In this study, I used a call-response occupancy survey at St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge to determine if using playback increased detection probabilities of Brown-headed Nuthatches.
  • PPCO Twist System

    PPCO Twist System

    A Brown-headed Nuthatch brings food to the nest. Color-coded leg bands enable the authors and their colleagues to discern the curious and potentially complex relationships among the various individuals at Tall Timbers Research Station on the Florida–Georgia line. Photo by © Tara Tanaka. photos by Tara Tanaka Tallahassee, Florida [email protected] 46 BIRDING • FEBRUARY 2016 arblers are gorgeous, jays boisterous, and sparrows elusive, Wbut words like “cute” and “adorable” come to mind when the conversation shifts to Brown-headed Nuthatches. The word “cute” doesn’t appear in the scientifc literature regularly, but science may help to explain its frequent association with nuthatch- es. The large heads and small bodies nuthatches possess have propor- tions similar to those found on young children. Psychologists have found that these proportions conjure up “innate attractive” respons- es among adult humans even when the proportions fall on strange objects (Little 2012). This range-restricted nuthatch associated with southeastern pine- woods has undergone steep declines in recent decades and is listed as a species of special concern in most states in which it breeds (Cox and Widener 2008). The population restricted to Grand Bahama Island appears to be critically endangered (Hayes et al. 2004). Add to these concerns some intriguing biology that includes helpers at the nest, communal winter roosts, seed caching, social grooming, and the use of tools, and you have some scintillating science all bound up in one “cute” and “adorable” package. James
  • Foraging Behavior of the Pygmy Nuthatch in Colorado Ponderosa Pine Forests

    Foraging Behavior of the Pygmy Nuthatch in Colorado Ponderosa Pine Forests

    FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF THE PYGMY NUTHATCH IN COLORADO PONDEROSA PINE FORESTS HEATHER EWELL and ALEXANDER CRUZ, Environmental,Population, and Organ- ismic Biology Department, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0334 The Pygmy Nuthatch (Sitta pygrnaea) is a permanent resident of mon- tane habitats in the Rocky Mountain region, occurring most commonlyin forests of PonderosaPine (Pinus ponderosa). In Colorado, the center of its distributionis in the lower montane region (1660 to 2425 m) (Bailey and Niedrach 1965, Andrews and Righter 1992). The breeding season (egg laying through fledglingstage) in Colorado lasts from early May to August (Bent 1964, Bailey and Niedrach 1965). The diet of the Pygmy Nuthatch consistsof both insect and vegetable matter. In Monterey County, California, Beal (1907) found that during late spring and early summer the diet consistedof 83% animal matter and 17% conifer seeds.Beal found that the insect diet is dominatedby Hymenoptera (38%), Homoptera (23%) and Coleoptera(12%). Norris (1958) found that in Marin County, California,in winter nuthatchesate an averageof 85 to 95% vegetable matter (pine seeds) while from April-September, they ate an average of 40 to 60% vegetable matter. In Larimer County, Colorado, McEllin (1979) noted that the nuthatches'diet shifted from primarilyinsects in the summerto primarilypine seedsin the winter. We observed the foraging behavior of Pygmy Nuthatches during the breeding (10 June-31 August 1995 and 15 June-31 August 1996) and non-breedingseason (1 March-30 April, 1995, 15 January-30 April 1996, and 1 September 1996-1 March 1997) in the PonderosaPine foothills of Colorado, focusing on foraging technique, position during foraging, and foraginglocation.
  • Cavity-Nesting Bird Habitat and Populations in Ponderosa Pine

    Cavity-Nesting Bird Habitat and Populations in Ponderosa Pine

    Land Managers’ Guide to Cavity-Nesting Bird Habitat and Populations in Ponderosa Pine Forests of the Pacific Northwest This open ponderosa pine slope with snags and grassland elements is Flammulated Owl habitat. Photo: Dan Casey, ABC Authors: Dan Casey, Bob Altman, Darin Stringer, Craig Thomas Cover photos courtesy of Dan Casey and Bob Altman, ABC Funding for this document was provided by the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service through the National Conservation Innovation Grant program, as part of a grant entitled “Integrating Management for Forest Health and Cavity-Nesting Bird Conservation in Ponderosa Pine Forests”. Additional funding partners include the Sustainable Forestry Initiative, through its Conservation & Community Partnerships Grant Program; the Biophilia Foundation, and ABC donor Joan Hero. Reviews of earlier drafts were provided by Gavin Shire. Layout and design by Gemma Radko. 2 Ponderosa Pine Cavity-Nesting Bird Guide Land Managers’ Guide to Cavity-Nesting Bird Habitat and Populations in Ponderosa Pine Forests of the Pacific Northwest Low older snag with multiple cavities, shrub understory. Photo: Dan Casey, ABC TOP OF PAGE Mountain Bluebirds: Greg Homel, Natural Elements Productions Ponderosa Pine Cavity-Nesting Bird Guide 3 Purpose of the Ponderosa Pine Cavity-Nesting Bird Guide This Ponderosa Pine Cavity-Nesting Bird Guide is intended to provide land man- agers in ponderosa pine habitats with information on bird species’ status, distri- bution, density, habitat relationships, and potential responses to habitat manage- ment or restoration activities. This information can be used to facilitate sound decisions to support bird conservation in the context of protection and manage- ment of the threatened ponderosa pine ecosystems of the Pacific Northwest.
  • A Conservation Blueprint for Neotropical Migratory Birds in Western Colorado

    A Conservation Blueprint for Neotropical Migratory Birds in Western Colorado

    A Conservation Blueprint for Neotropical Migratory Birds in Western Colorado Michelle Fink, David Hanni, David Klute, John Sovell, and Renée Rondeau December 2007 Photo by Dave Menke, Photo Courtesy of U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Final report submitted to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (Neotropical Migratory Bird Act). Executive Summary The purpose of this project was to incorporate land use, policy, and biological inputs to define areas representing the most important opportunities for conservation of Neotropical migratory birds in coniferous and aspen forest habitats in Western Colorado and to understand the current status and requirements for maintaining viable populations of these migratory birds within the project area. To that end, we used NatureServe Vista, a decision-support software, and SPOT, a conservation portfolio optimization software, to analyze information about bird distribution, abundance, conservation priorities, quantitative conservation goals, threats to ecosystem stability, and current landscape integrity in order to identify conservation needs and opportunities for birds in aspen and conifer forests in western Colorado. Twenty-two forest-based bird species were used as conservation targets. Multi-year survey data from the Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory was combined with data from the Colorado Natural Heritage Program’s Biodiversity Tracking and Conservation System (BIOTICS) database in addition to modified Southwest Regional GAP vertebrate models for the target species. We used available statewide spatial data to determine general landscape integrity for these species, current and future predicted land use, and policy mandated protection status. This information was then input in NatureServe Vista and SPOT projects and evaluated against varying conservation goal sets for the target species.
  • Pygmy Nuthatch in Mountain Region

    Pygmy Nuthatch in Mountain Region

    United States Department of Agriculture Conservation Assessment Forest Service Rocky of the Pygmy Nuthatch in Mountain Region Black Hills the Black Hills National National Forest Custer, Forest, South Dakota and South Dakota May 2003 Wyoming Cameron Ghalambor Conservation Assessment of the Pygmy Nuthatch in the Black Hills National Forest, South Dakota and Wyoming Cameron Ghalambor Department of Biology University of California – Riverside Riverside, CA 92521 Under a personal services contract with: USDA Forest Service Black Hills National Forest Cameron Ghalambor is currently a postdoctoral research biologist at the University of California at Riverside. He received his B. A. from University of California at Los Angeles and his Ph.D. from the University of Montana at Missoula. His Ph.D. and subsequent research has focused in part on the comparative reproductive biology of Pygmy, Red-breasted, and White-breasted Nuthatches. His work on nuthatches and related species has investigated such questions as 1) the ecological and evolutionary determinants that shape different incubation strategies, 2) the role of life histories in determining parental investment strategies, and 3) the adaptive significance of conifer resin use at Red-breasted Nuthatch nests. His current address is: Department of Biology, University of California - Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................... 1 CURRENT MANAGEMENT
  • Prescribed Fire Effects on Wintering, Bark-Foraging Birds in Northern Arizona

    Prescribed Fire Effects on Wintering, Bark-Foraging Birds in Northern Arizona

    Management and Conservation Article Prescribed Fire Effects on Wintering, Bark-Foraging Birds in Northern Arizona THERESA L. POPE,1,2 United States Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2500 S Pine Knoll Drive, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA WILLIAM M. BLOCK, United States Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2500 S Pine Knoll Drive, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA PAUL BEIER, School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, P.O. Box 15018, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA ABSTRACT We examined effects of prescribed fire on 3 wintering, bark-foraging birds, hairy woodpeckers (Picoides villosus), pygmy nuthatches (Sitta pygmaea), and white-breasted nuthatches (S. carolinensis), in ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests of northern Arizona, USA. During winters of 2004–2006, we compared bird density, foraging behavior, and bark beetle activity among burned treatment and unburned control units. Hairy woodpecker density was 5 times greater in burn units, whereas white-breasted nuthatches and pygmy nuthatches had similar densities between treatments. Compared to available trees, trees used by foraging hairy woodpeckers had 9 times greater odds of having bark beetles in control units and 12 times greater odds in burn units. Tree diameter appeared to be the main factor bark-foraging birds used in selecting winter foraging trees. Our results suggest that forest managers can use prescribed fire treatments without detrimental effects to wintering nuthatches, while providing additional food to hairy woodpeckers. (JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT 73(5):695– 700; 2009) DOI: 10.2193/2007-537 KEY WORDS Arizona, bark-foraging birds, hairy woodpecker, Picoides villosus, prescribed fire, pygmy nuthatch, Sitta carolinensis, Sitta pygmaea, white-breasted nuthatch, winter.
  • Nest Characteristics of the Eastern Rock Nuthatch (Sitta Tephronota) in Southwestern Iran

    Nest Characteristics of the Eastern Rock Nuthatch (Sitta Tephronota) in Southwestern Iran

    Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 66(1), pp. 85–98, 2020 DOI: 10.17109/AZH.66.1.85.2020 NEST CHARACTERISTICS OF THE EASTERN ROCK NUTHATCH (SITTA TEPHRONOTA) IN SOUTHWESTERN IRAN Arya Shafaeipour1*, Behzad Fathinia1 and Jerzy Michalczuk2 1Department of Biology, University of Yasouj, Yasouj, Iran E-mails: [email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4267-536X [email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5752-9288 2Department of Nature Protection and Landscape Ecology, University of Rzeszów Zelwerowicza 4, 35-601 Rzeszów, Poland E-mail: [email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9311-7731 In the springs of 2015–2017, the population size and nest characteristics of the Eastern Rock Nuthatch (Sitta tephronota) were investigated. The study was conducted in a 400 hectare area of the mountainous region of southwestern Iran. In 2016, the population of the Eastern Rock Nuthatch was estimated at 33 pairs and its density was 8.25 breeding pairs per 100 ha of the study area. During the study, 45 nuthatch nests were investigated, of which 15 (33%) were found in cliffs and 28 (62%) were located in tree holes; 2% were built in house and bridge walls. The height of the nest was 214.3±112.3 cm above ground level. The mean of the horizontal and vertical depths of the nest chambers in trees was 17.8±3.7 and 12.6±3.2 cm respectively, and statistically differed from those in rocky nests (respectively 23.9±5.5 and 10.8±4.6 cm). However, chamber volumes did not statistically differ between these two nest type categories.
  • Habitat Selection by Selected Breeding Passerine Birds in Pine-Oak Forests of Northern Arizona

    Habitat Selection by Selected Breeding Passerine Birds in Pine-Oak Forests of Northern Arizona

    HABITAT SELECTION BY SELECTED BREEDING PASSERINE BIRDS IN PINE-OAK FORESTS OF NORTHERN ARIZONA By Tamara D. Lesh A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Forestry Northern Arizona University August. 1999 1Beier, Ph.D., Chair M(,~~- Ste n Rosenstock, ~tS. ABSTRACT HABITAT SELECTION BY SELECTED BREEDING PASSERINE BIRDS IN PINE-OAK FORESTS OF NORTHERN ARIZONA TAMARA D. LESH Forest treatments proposed to restore pre-settlement conditions for northern Arizona ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) forests will dramatically alter forest structure by reducing densities of smaller diameter trees. Baseline information on habitat selection is needed to understand responses of passerine birds to these treatments. During the 1997 and 1998 breeding seasons, I examined foraging-habitat selection by 5 permanent resident species ~ hairy woodpeckers (Picoides villosus), mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli), white-breasted nuthatches (SUra carolinensis), pygmy nuthatches (S. pygmaea), and dark­ eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis) - and 3 neotropical migrants, Virginia's warblers (Vennivora virginiaey, p1umbeus vireos (Vireo plumbeus), and western tanagers (Piranga ludoviciana}, I measured and analyzed habitat selection at 2 scales, the foraging tree (third-order selection sensu Johnson 1980) and within a 0.04-ha plot centered on each foraging location (Johnson's second-order selection). I analyzed microhabitat selection for all species with> 41 observations. I detected third-order selection by pygmy nuthatches and Virginia's warblers at Camp Navajo and by white-breasted nuthatches, dark-eyed juncos, and hairy woodpeckers at Mt. Trumbull. CART models indicated second-order selection by white-breasted nuthatches, pygmy nuthatches, Virginia's warblers, plumbeus vireos, and western tanagers at Camp Navajo 11 and by pygmy nuthatches, dark-eyed juncos, and plumbeus vireos at Mt.
  • Critter Class Nuthatches

    Critter Class Nuthatches

    Critter Class Nuthatches White breasted Nuthatch December 1, 2011 MVK: Some were asking where the nuthatch got the name - They get their common name from their habit of jamming large nuts and acorns into tree bark, then whacking them with their sharp bill to “hatch” out the seed from the inside. White- breasted Nuthatches may be small but their voices are loud, and often their insistent nasal yammering will lead you right to them. Per Allaboutbirds.com MVK: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHlTrWQbnms MVK: White-breasted nuthatch by E. George Strasser There is a little bird, who lives in my hometown. he is the strangest bird, as he's mostly upside down. He may come to your feeder, for a seed or two to take. he really does like best, to peck a suet cake. He searches bark for insects, and his wings may start to flutter. when he finds somebody's feeder, is filled with peanut butter. The constant nasal chatter, whenever he's around. you'll know exactly who it is, when you just hear the sound. How they named this bird, I really do not know. he's surely not a nut, and hatched a while ago. Through snow or heat of summer, at any time of year. he migrates not at all, so always will be here. As you watch this small bird's antics, you'll never have a frown. because this little bird, is mostly upside down Critter Class – Nuthatches 1 12/1/2011 Comment: I love to watch Snitch walking straight down that concrete wall in the bear pen.
  • Learn About Texas Birds Activity Book

    Learn About Texas Birds Activity Book

    Learn about . A Learning and Activity Book Color your own guide to the birds that wing their way across the plains, hills, forests, deserts and mountains of Texas. Text Mark W. Lockwood Conservation Biologist, Natural Resource Program Editorial Direction Georg Zappler Art Director Elena T. Ivy Educational Consultants Juliann Pool Beverly Morrell © 1997 Texas Parks and Wildlife 4200 Smith School Road Austin, Texas 78744 PWD BK P4000-038 10/97 All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means – graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or information storage and retrieval systems – without written permission of the publisher. Another "Learn about Texas" publication from TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE PRESS ISBN- 1-885696-17-5 Key to the Cover 4 8 1 2 5 9 3 6 7 14 16 10 13 20 19 15 11 12 17 18 19 21 24 23 20 22 26 28 31 25 29 27 30 ©TPWPress 1997 1 Great Kiskadee 16 Blue Jay 2 Carolina Wren 17 Pyrrhuloxia 3 Carolina Chickadee 18 Pyrrhuloxia 4 Altamira Oriole 19 Northern Cardinal 5 Black-capped Vireo 20 Ovenbird 6 Black-capped Vireo 21 Brown Thrasher 7Tufted Titmouse 22 Belted Kingfisher 8 Painted Bunting 23 Belted Kingfisher 9 Indigo Bunting 24 Scissor-tailed Flycatcher 10 Green Jay 25 Wood Thrush 11 Green Kingfisher 26 Ruddy Turnstone 12 Green Kingfisher 27 Long-billed Thrasher 13 Vermillion Flycatcher 28 Killdeer 14 Vermillion Flycatcher 29 Olive Sparrow 15 Blue Jay 30 Olive Sparrow 31 Great Horned Owl =female =male Texas Birds More kinds of birds have been found in Texas than any other state in the United States: just over 600 species.
  • Species Risk Assessment

    Species Risk Assessment

    Ecological Sustainability Analysis of the Kaibab National Forest: Species Diversity Report Ver. 1.2 Prepared by: Mikele Painter and Valerie Stein Foster Kaibab National Forest For: Kaibab National Forest Plan Revision Analysis 22 December 2008 SpeciesDiversity-Report-ver-1.2.doc 22 December 2008 Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 PART I: Species Diversity.............................................................................................................. 1 Species List ................................................................................................................................. 1 Criteria .................................................................................................................................... 2 Assessment Sources................................................................................................................ 3 Screening Results.................................................................................................................... 4 Habitat Associations and Initial Species Groups........................................................................ 8 Species associated with ecosystem diversity characteristics of terrestrial vegetation or aquatic systems ......................................................................................................................