2010 Interim Record
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
NBAF Final Environmental Impact Statement
NATIONAL BIO AND AGRO-DEFENSE FACILITY FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT APPENDIX H COMMENT RESPONSE DOCUMENT DECEMBER 2008 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Chapter 1 – Comment Response Document NBAF Final Environmental Impact Statement Comment Response Document, Chapter 1 PUBLIC COMMENT PROCESS This chapter of the Comment Response Document describes the public comment process for the National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility (NBAF) Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and the procedures used in responding to those comments. Section 1.1 describes the various means through which comments were acquired. Section 1.2 discusses the public meeting format used to gather comments from the public. Section 1.3 describes the organization of this document and explains how the comments were categorized, addressed, and documented. Section 1.4 provides guidance to assist readers in locating comments and DHS responses. Section 1.5 presents the major issues raised in a majority of comments. In Section 1.6, the chapter concludes with a list of significant changes to the EIS resulting from public comments. 1.1 INTRODUCTION In June 2008, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published the National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility (NBAF) Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), which analyzed six action alternatives as well as a No Action Alternative. The action alternatives include construction and operation of the proposed NBAF at one of the following site alternatives: (1) South Milledge Avenue Site, Athens, Georgia; (2) Manhattan Campus Site, Manhattan, Kansas; (3) Flora Industrial Park Site, Flora, Mississippi; (4) Plum Island Site, Plum Island, New York; (5) Umstead Research Farm Site, Butner, North Carolina; and (6) Texas Research Park Site, San Antonio, Texas. -
Final Reports of the Interim Joint, Statutory, and Special Committees
Final Reports Of The Interim Joint, Statutory, And Special Committees Informational Bulletin No. 259 December 2020 Kentucky Legislative Research Commission SENATE HOUSE Robert Stivers David W. Osborne President, LRC Co-Chair Speaker, LRC Co-Chair David P. Givens David Meade President Pro Tempore Speaker Pro Tempore Damon Thayer Steven Rudy Majority Floor Leader Majority Floor Leader Morgan McGarvey Joni L. Jenkins Minority Floor Leader Minority Floor Leader Julie Raque Adams Suzanne Miles Majority Caucus Chair Majority Caucus Chair Johnny Ray Turner Derrick Graham Minority Caucus Chair Minority Caucus Chair Mike Wilson Chad McCoy Majority Whip Majority Whip Dennis Parrett Angie Hatton Minority Whip Minority Whip Jay D. Hartz, Director The Kentucky Legislative Research Commission is a 16-member committee that comprises the majority and minority leadership of the Kentucky Senate and House of Representatives. Under Chapter 7 of the Kentucky Revised Statutes, the Commission constitutes the administrative office for the Kentucky General Assembly. Its director serves as chief administrative officer of the legislature when it is not in session. The Commission and its staff, by law and by practice, perform numerous fact-finding and service functions for members of the General Assembly. The Commission provides professional, clerical, and other employees required by legislators when the General Assembly is in session and during the interim period between sessions. These employees, in turn, assist committees and individual members in preparing legislation. Other services include conducting studies and investigations, organizing and staffing committee meetings and public hearings, maintaining official legislative records and other reference materials, furnishing information about the legislature to the public, compiling and publishing administrative regulations, administering a legislative intern program, conducting a presession orientation conference for legislators, and publishing a daily index of legislative activity during sessions of the General Assembly. -
Legislative Guide Ejrodriquez/Adobe Stock
KENTUCKY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVES 2021 LEGISLATIVE GUIDE EJRODRIQUEZ/ADOBE STOCK Serving more than 1.5 million people in 117 of 120 Kentucky counties, Kentucky’s member-owned electric cooperatives are committed to improving the quality of life for their consumer-members. We encourage Kentuckians to engage with elected leaders and advocate for safe, reliable and affordable electricity. 1 TIM WEBB This 2021 Legislative Guide is provided as a public service by Co-ops work together to keep the power grid secure. Kentucky Electric Cooperatives, the statewide association When disasters strike, electric co-ops are always ready to that represents 26 co-ops that serve more than 1.5 million lend a hand. Kentuckians in 117 of the commonwealth’s 120 counties. We appreciate the service of elected leaders and other We work to educate elected leaders and advocate for government officials tasked with oversight of the energy policies that support our ability to provide safe, reliable and sector, and we are proud to be a trusted resource for any affordable electricity. questions about how public policy affects our ability to Each of Kentucky’s local electric cooperatives is locally effectively serve our members. owned and controlled by the consumer-members who are We encourage you to pull out this guide, save it and served by that local co-op. Each co-op was built by, belongs use it to contact elected leaders about issues that are to and is led by people in its own community. important to you. In that spirit, we encourage local co-op members to join our grassroots portal to stay up to date and communicate with legislators about issues important to co-ops. -
March 23, 2020 Via Email Governor Andy Beshear Lt. Governor
March 23, 2020 Via email Governor Andy Beshear Lt. Governor Jacqueline Coleman The Honorable Robert Stivers The Honorable Morgan McGarvey The Honorable David Osborne The Honorable Joni Jenkins Dear Governor Beshear, Lt. Governor Coleman and Legislative Leaders: This letter is intended to provide additional recommendations urgently requested by Kentucky’s nonprofit sector as a follow up to the letter originally submitted via email on March 17 (see below). The original recommendations and these additions are critical to the nonprofit sector’s ability to weather this storm and continue to serve Kentucky’s most vulnerable during this crisis. Disruptions in state grants and contracts could trigger massive layoffs or even permanently shut down organizations providing health services, food assistance, emergency shelter, senior care, emergency child-care, mental health, substance use disorder treatment and other essential services in the Commonwealth. In addition to the original recommendations (see below), we recommend: • Special attention and funding are needed for the homeless population in Kentucky. Homeless individuals are not able to safely practice social distancing, wash their hands or take other recommended precautions to stay safe. They are also more likely to have underlying health conditions and a high volume of infection among this population will seriously stress our health system. Emergency funding to agencies that provide housing, healthcare and other services to homeless populations are needed, as well as creative responses to relieve existing shelters that do not have enough distance between beds to keep the virus from spreading. • We urge the Commonwealth to maintain customary payments to nonprofits that have current grants and contracts. -
2008 Political Contributions (July 1 – December 31)
2008 Political Contributions (July 1 – December 31) Amgen is committed to serving patients by transforming the promise of science and biotechnology into therapies that have the power to restore health or even save lives. Amgen recognizes the importance of sound public policy in achieving this goal, and, accordingly, participates in the political process and supports those candidates, committees, and other organizations who work to advance healthcare innovation and improve patient access. Amgen participates in the political process by making direct corporate contributions as well as contributions through its employee-funded Political Action Committee (“Amgen PAC”). In some states, corporate contributions to candidates for state or local elected offices are permissible, while in other states and at the federal level, political contributions are only made through the Amgen PAC. Under certain circumstances, Amgen may lawfully contribute to other political committees and political organizations, including political party committees, industry PACs, leadership PACs, and Section 527 organizations. Amgen also participates in ballot initiatives and referenda at the state and local level. Amgen is committed to complying with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations that govern all such contributions. The list below contains information about political contributions for the second half of 2008 by Amgen and Amgen PAC. It includes contributions to candidate committees, political party committees, industry PACs, leadership PACs, Section 527 organizations, and state and local ballot initiatives and referenda. These contributions are categorized by state, political party (if applicable), political office (where applicable), recipient, contributor (Amgen Inc. or Amgen PAC) and amount. State Party Candidate Office Committee/PAC Name Candidate Name Corp. -
February 10, 2020 Via Electronic Communication David W. Osborne
February 10, 2020 Via Electronic Communication David W. Osborne David Meade Chair, Committee on Committees Vice-Chair, Committee on Committees Kentucky House of Representatives Kentucky House of Representatives [email protected] [email protected] Re: Letter in Support of HB114 Dear Representatives Osborne and Meade: Aimed Alliance is a 501(c)(3) non-profit health policy organization that seeks to protect and enhance the rights of health care consumers and providers. We are writing in support of HB114, and we ask that you approve the bill, with a few changes, for a full vote before the legislature. Historically, privately insured individuals who cannot afford their copayments or coinsurance have been able to obtain aid from copayment assistance programs –programs in which a pharmaceutical manufacturer may offer cost-sharing assistance, typically in the form of a coupon card, to an individual to ease the burden of high out-of-pocket costs. Traditionally, the coupon card contributes also toward the patient’s deductible and maximum out-of-pocket limit. These programs have been especially helpful for individuals enrolled in high deductible health plans (HDHPs) in which the patient is responsible for high out-of-pocket costs until the deductible is reached. Increasingly, HDHPs are the only option for many Americans; many employers and marketplace exchanges only offer HDHPs.1 Health plans are increasingly implementing copay accumulator programs, which prevent the value of a drug manufacturer’s coupon from counting toward a patient’s deductible and maximum out-of-pocket limit.2 Under such programs, once copayment assistance runs out, the plan enrollee is again faced with an inability to afford his or her medication. -
East Stand (A)
EAST STAND (A) ACHIE ATWELL • GEORGE BOGGIS • JOHN ELLIOTT • DAVID BREWSTER • GILLIAN ROBINS • DESMOND DESHAUT • PETER CWIECZEK • JAMES BALLARD • PETER TAYLOR • JOHN CLEARY • MARK LIGHTERNESS • TERENCE KERRISON • ANTHONY TROCIAN • GEORGE BURT • JESSICA RICHARDSON • STEVE WICK • BETHAN MAYNARD • MICHAEL SAMMONS • DAN MAUGHAN • EMILY CRANE • STEFANO SALUSTRI • MARTIN CHIDWICK • SOPHIA THURSTON • RICHARD HACK • PHILIP PITT • ROBERT SAMBIDGE • DEREK VOLLER • DAVID PARKINSON • LEONARD COONEY • KAREN PARISH • KIRSTY NORFOLK • SAMUEL MONAGHAN • TONY CLARKE • RAY MCCRINDLE • MIKKEL RUDE • FREDERIC HALLER • JAMIE JAXON • SCOTT JASON • JACQUELINE DUTTON • RICHARD GRAHAM • MATTHEW SHEEHAN • EMILY CONSTABLE • TERRY MARABLE • DANNY SMALLDRIDGE • PAULA GRACE • JOHN ASHCROFT • BARNABY BLACKMAN • JESSICA REYNOLDS • DENNIS DODD • GRAHAM HAWKES • SHAUN MCCABE • STEPHEN RUGGIERO • ALAN DUFFY • BEN PETERS • PAUL SHEPPARD • SIMON WISE • IAN SCOTT • MARK FINSTER • CONNOR MCCLYMONT • JOSEPH O’DRISCOLL • FALCON GREEN • LEAH FINCHAM • ROSS TAYLOR • YONI ADLER • SAMUEL LENNON • IAN PARSONS • GEORGE REILLY • BRIAN WINTER • JOSEPH BROWN • CHARLIE HENNEY • PAUL PRYOR • ROBERT BOURKE • DAREN HALL • DANIEL HANBURY • JOHN PRYOR • BOBBY O’DONOGHUE • ROBERT KNIGHT • BILLY GREEN • MAISIE-JAE JOYCE • LEONARD GAYLE • KEITH JONES • PETER MOODY • ANDY ATWELL DANIEL SEDDON • ROBBIE WRIGHT • PAUL BOWKER • KELLY CLARK • DUNCAN LEVERETT • BILL SINGH • RODNEY CASSAR • ASHER BRILL • MARTIN WILLIAMS • KEVIN BANE • TERRY PORTER • GARETH DUGGAN • DARREN SHEPHERD • KEN CAMPBELL • PHYLLIS -
2011 Political Contributions (July 1 – December 31)
2011 Political Contributions (July 1 – December 31) Amgen is committed to serving patients by transforming the promise of science and biotechnology into therapies that have the power to restore health or even save lives. Amgen recognizes the importance of sound public policy in achieving this goal, and, accordingly, participates in the political process and supports those candidates, committees, and other organizations who work to advance healthcare innovation and improve patient access. Amgen participates in the political process by making direct corporate contributions as well as contributions through its employee-funded Political Action Committee (“Amgen PAC”). In some states, corporate contributions to candidates for state or local elected offices are permissible, while in other states and at the federal level, political contributions are only made through the Amgen PAC. Under certain circumstances, Amgen may lawfully contribute to other political committees and political organizations, including political party committees, industry PACs, leadership PACs, and Section 527 organizations. Amgen also participates in ballot initiatives and referenda at the state and local level. Amgen is committed to complying with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations that govern such contributions. The list below contains information about political contributions for the second half of 2011 by Amgen and the Amgen PAC. It includes contributions to candidate committees, political party committees, industry PACs, leadership PACs, Section 527 organizations, and state and local ballot initiatives and referenda. These contributions are categorized by state, political party (if applicable), political office (where applicable), recipient, contributor (Amgen Inc. or Amgen PAC) and amount. Candidate Office State Party Office Sought Committee/PAC Name Candidate Name Corp. -
Political Contributions & Related Activity Report
Political Contributions & Related Activity Report 2012 CARTER BECK JACKIE MACIAS ALAN ALBRIGHT SVP & Counsel VP & General Manager Legal Counsel to WellPAC Medicaid JOHN JESSER VP, Provider Engagement & GLORIA MCCARTHY JOHN WILLEY COC EVP, Enterprise Execution & Sr. Director, Efciency Government Relations 2012 WellPAC DAVID KRETSCHMER WellPAC Treasurer SVP, Treasurer & Chief MIKE MELLOH Investment Ofcer VP, Human Resources TRACY WINN Board of Directors Manager, Public Affairs ANDREW MORRISON DEB MOESSNER WellPAC Assistant Treasurer & SVP, Public Affairs President & General Manager Executive Director WellPAC Chairman KY 1 from the Chairman America’s health care system is in the midst of transformative change, and WellPoint is leading the way by making it easier for consumers to access and use it while improving the health of the people we serve. In this new post-reform era, WellPoint’s Public Affairs function is more important than ever as the government expands its regulatory scope into our key lines of business. By 2015, almost 66 percent of the company’s revenue will be paid either in part or entirely by the federal and state government. For this reason, we continue to play an active role in the political process through our Public Affairs efforts, industry memberships and WellPAC, our political action committee. More than 1,875 WellPoint associates provided voluntary nancial support to WellPAC in 2012. Their generosity allowed our PAC to make contributions of more than $780,000 to federal campaigns and $140,000 to state and local campaigns on both sides of the political aisle in 2012. Our participation in the political process helps us develop good working relationships with Members of Congress, as well as key state legislators, in order to communicate WellPoint’s perspective on a range of issues including the cost and quality of today’s health care, the establishment of insurance exchanges and the expansion of Medicaid. -
Pfizer Inc. Regarding Congruency of Political Contributions on Behalf of Tara Health Foundation
SANFORD J. LEWIS, ATTORNEY January 28, 2021 Via electronic mail Office of Chief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549 Re: Shareholder Proposal to Pfizer Inc. Regarding congruency of political contributions on Behalf of Tara Health Foundation Ladies and Gentlemen: Tara Health Foundation (the “Proponent”) is beneficial owner of common stock of Pfizer Inc. (the “Company”) and has submitted a shareholder proposal (the “Proposal”) to the Company. I have been asked by the Proponent to respond to the supplemental letter dated January 25, 2021 ("Supplemental Letter") sent to the Securities and Exchange Commission by Margaret M. Madden. A copy of this response letter is being emailed concurrently to Margaret M. Madden. The Company continues to assert that the proposal is substantially implemented. In essence, the Company’s original and supplemental letters imply that under the substantial implementation doctrine as the company understands it, shareholders are not entitled to make the request of this proposal for an annual examination of congruency, but that a simple written acknowledgment that Pfizer contributions will sometimes conflict with company values is all on this topic that investors are entitled to request through a shareholder proposal. The Supplemental letter makes much of the claim that the proposal does not seek reporting on “instances of incongruency” but rather on how Pfizer’s political and electioneering expenditures aligned during the preceding year against publicly stated company values and policies.” While the company has provided a blanket disclaimer of why its contributions may sometimes be incongruent, the proposal calls for an annual assessment of congruency. -
Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut
This list is a comprehensive list of state legislators who are members of ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council). There are 1192 Republicans, 61 Democrats, 11 Non-Partisans (NE) members. There have been 45 members who have left ALEC in the last month; 11 Republicans, 32 Democrats, 2 Non-Partisans (NE) (Corporate Campaign). There have been 108 ALEC Legislators who have either lost or given up their seats. These are the people who are carrying out the extreme right -wing agenda in the states. They go to all expense paid ALEC meetings where they get treated to lavish accommodations, meals and entertainment for the small price of destroying our democracy. They target minorities, workers, women and democratically elected city and school board members. They push privatization as the answer when it has been proven that it is less efficient and more costly. The Kochs were funding the reintroduction of segregation into a school district in NC. Alabama Louisiana Ohio Alaska Maine Oklahoma Arizona Maryland Oregon Arkansas Massachusetts Pennsylvania California Michigan Rhode_Island Colorado Minnesota South_Carolina Connecticut Mississippi South_Dakota Delaware Missouri Tennessee Florida Montana Texas Georgia Nebraska Utah Hawaii Nevada Vermont Idaho New_Hampshire Virginia Illinois New_Jersey Washington Indiana New_Mexico West_Virginia Iowa New_York Wisconsin Kansas North_Carolina Wyoming Kentucky North_Dakota Alabama ALEC Legislators Rep. Karen Fann (R-1) Pres.P.Tem.S.Tenney Allen (R-5) House of Representatives Rep. Eddie Farnsworth (R-22) Rep. Richard Miranda (D-13) Rep. Jim Carns (R-48) Rep. John Fillmore (R-23) Former ALEC Legislators Rep. Victor Gaston (R-100) Rep. Thomas Forese (R-21) Sen. Russell Pearce Rep. -
Legislative Guide Ejrodriquez/Adobe Stock
KENTUCKY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVES 2021 LEGISLATIVE GUIDE EJRODRIQUEZ/ADOBE STOCK Serving more than 1.5 million people in 117 of 120 Kentucky counties, Kentucky’s member-owned electric cooperatives are committed to improving the quality of life for their consumer-members. We encourage Kentuckians to engage with elected leaders and advocate for safe, reliable and affordable electricity. 1 KENTUCKY CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICES KENTUCKY CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION Andy Beshear Jacqueline Coleman Sen. Mitch McConnell Sen. Rand Paul Governor Lt. Governor Senate Minority Leader (202) 224-4343 (502) 564-2611 (502) 564-2611 (202) 224-2541 Allison Ball Michael Adams Rep. James Comer Rep. Brett Guthrie Treasurer Secretary of State 1st District 2nd District TIM WEBB (502) 564-4722 (502) 564-3490 (202) 225-3115 (202) 225-3501 This 2021 Legislative Guide is provided as a public service by Co-ops work together to keep the power grid secure. Kentucky Electric Cooperatives, the statewide association When disasters strike, electric co-ops are always ready to that represents 26 co-ops that serve more than 1.5 million lend a hand. Kentuckians in 117 of the commonwealth’s 120 counties. We appreciate the service of elected leaders and other We work to educate elected leaders and advocate for government officials tasked with oversight of the energy policies that support our ability to provide safe, reliable and sector, and we are proud to be a trusted resource for any affordable electricity. questions about how public policy affects our ability to Each of Kentucky’s local electric cooperatives is locally effectively serve our members. Mike Harmon Daniel Cameron Rep.