Nice Complete Sets of Pairwise Quasi-Orthogonal Masas —From the Basics to a Unique Encoding—

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nice Complete Sets of Pairwise Quasi-Orthogonal Masas —From the Basics to a Unique Encoding— Mathematik Dissertationsthema Nice Complete Sets of Pairwise Quasi-Orthogonal Masas —From the Basics to a Unique Encoding— Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften im Fachbereich Mathematik und Informatik der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster vorgelegt von Sebastian Krusekamp aus Paderborn – 2014 – Dekan : Prof. Dr. Martin Stein Erster Gutachter : Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Joachim Cuntz Zweiter Gutachter : Prof. Dr. Andreas Winter Tag der mündlichen Prüfung : 14.8.2014 Tag der Promotion : 14.8.2014 PhD Thesis Nice Complete Sets of Pairwise Quasi-Orthogonal Masas —From the Basics to a Unique Encoding— Sebastian Krusekamp Münster 2014 Supervised by Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Joachim Cuntz Abstract Mutually unbiased bases (MUBs) have gained considerable importance in the field of quantum physics over the past twenty-five years. Various applications have been found (see e.g. the survey article [35]), and connections to different mathematical domains of interest, such as unitary Hadamard matrices ([13]), Ga- lois fields ([114]), Latin squares and design theory ([79, 112]), and finite geometry ([89]), are numerous. The counterpart of mutually unbiased bases on the level of matrix algebras are pairwise quasi-orthogonal maximal abelian ∗-subalgebras, briefly called masas. Whereas physicists’ accounts on the subject mainly focus on the picture of MUBs (e.g. [27, 35]), the present mathematical thesis centres on the algebraic framework of quasi-orthogonal masas. Starting from the very basics, we first thoroughly discuss the connections be- tween the equivalent pictures of (mutually) unbiased bases, unbiased unitary Ha- damard matrices, and quasi-orthogonal masas, and illustrate two of the most fa- mous constructions of so-called complete sets of pairwise quasi-orthogonal masas in prime power dimensions. Though this is a mathematical thesis, we also turn our attention to basic physical aspects of MUBs. We attach special importance on standard pairs of masas ([44]), and generalise this notion to pairs which we call normal. While standard pairs in dimension d model actions of the cyclic group of order d on the complex functions on d different points, normal masa pairs model actions of direct sums Z/d0 × · · · × Z/dm on the same function space, where d = d0 ··· dm is any factorisation of the dimension. We shortly address a further generalisation of normal masa pairs, and demonstrate that this generalised class comprises all quasi-orthogonal pairs in dimension four. Our concept of normal masa pairs is compatible with the existing definition of nice masa families by Aschbacher, Childs, and Wocjan ([3]), in the sense that each normal masa pair is a nice family of length two. Moreover, each masa pair in a complete nice family is automatically normal. According to Godsil and Roy ([40]), all known constructions of complete quasi-orthogonal masa sets produce nice families. We show that the generalised Clifford algebra, as defined by Yamazaki and Morris in the sixties ([74,75,115]), is an appropriate framework for the construction of nice complete masa families. As the main result of this thesis, we prove that, although various constructions of nice complete families have been proposed so far (e.g. [1, 9, 49, 60, 114]), one unique method permits to encode all nice complete families. Calderbank, Cameron, Kantor, and Seidel ([23]) had established an equivalent result earlier, in terms of so-called symplectic spreads, as has later been observed by Godsil and Roy ([40]). By contrast to this approach, the one presented here is based on more or less elementary means of matrix algebra. The unique encoding of nice complete masa families opens the theoretical door to classify the latter. While the complete nice masa families in the smallest dimen- sions turn out to be essentially unique, it is known that there are many prime power dimensions admitting inequivalent complete families. However, the classi- fication of these families appears to be an extraordinarily complicated matter ofits own, and is not dealt with in the present work. Danksagung (Acknowledgements) Herzlich möchte ich mich an erster Stelle bei meinem Betreuer Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Joachim Cuntz bedanken. Er erlaubte mir frei und eigenständig zu arbeiten, nahm sich zugleich aber stets Zeit für ausführliche Besprechungen, die für mich nicht nur mathematisch sehr anregend und lehrreich, sondern oft genug auch persönlich ermutigend waren, gerade wenn sich Erfolge mitunter nur schleppend einstellten. Meinen Freunden und Kollegen am Fachbereich Mathematik der Wilhelms- Universität Münster, vor allem in der Arbeitsgruppe Funktionalanalysis, Operatoral- gebren und nichtkommutative Geometrie, danke ich für das menschlich wie mathema- tisch hervorragende Arbeitsumfeld. Zum Glück gehören Elke und Gabi dazu, die immer einen klaren Kopf und ein gutes Wort haben, vom richtigen Formular ganz zu schweigen. Meine Freunde Klaus und Walther waren mir zugleich wunderbare Büro-Kol- legen. Beiden bin ich darüber hinaus, wie auch Thomas und Moritz, zu Dank verpflichtet für konkrete fachliche Hilfe und fruchtbare Diskussionen. Prof. Dr. Andreas Winter gab mir wertvolle Impulse bei meiner Suche nach einem interesssanten Thema. Zudem erklärte er sich bereit, Zweitgutachter dieser Arbeit zu sein. Für beides danke ich ihm herzlich. Prof. Dr. Urs Hartl nahm sich die Zeit, Fragestellungen meiner Arbeit mit mir zu diskutieren. Ihm bin ich ebenso dankbar wie Prof. Dr. William M. Kantor, der mir mit großer Klarheit und Freund- lichkeit eine Forschungsfrage beantwortete, die mich so lange verfolgte. Großen Dank schulde ich Franziska für die Korrektur meiner sprachlichen Mängel in wichtigen Textpassagen. Meiner Familie danke ich; meinen Freundinnen und Freunden, neben den be- reits genannten vor allem Thomas, Doris und Stefan mit Alida, Marika und Frank, Barbara und Thomas, Jule und Didi, Robert, Carl und schließlich Bruno, für ihre vielfältige Unterstützung in den vergangenen Jahren. Zu guter Letzt danke ich meiner Freundin Johanna, für alles. Contents Introduction 1 Motivation and subject classification . 1 Content and organisation of the present thesis . 2 Notations and conventions . 5 1 Maximal abelian *-subalgebras (masas) in the complex d×d-matrices 9 1.1 Motivation: Finite dimensional quantum systems and maximal abelian *-subalgebras . 9 1.2 Masas in the complex d×d-matrices, and associated orthonormal bases and unitaries . 12 1.3 Complex Hadamard matrices . 17 1.4 Unitary Hilbert-Schmidt orthonormal bases of masas . 21 2 Quasi-orthogonality of masas 27 2.1 Motivation: Pairs of mutually unbiased bases in quantum physics . 27 2.2 Quasi-orthogonal masas, unbiased bases and unbiased unitaries . 29 2.3 Measures of quasi-orthogonality . 41 2.4 Equivalent, standard, and non-standard pairs of quasi-orthogonal masas 53 2.5 Excursion: Standard pairs of masas and crossed products . 63 3 Families of pairwise quasi-orthogonal masas 71 3.1 Motivation: Optimal state-determination of quantum systems . 71 3.2 Maximal and complete families of pairwise quasi-orthogonal masas and the MUB-Problem . 78 3.3 Constructions of complete quasi-orthogonal families of masas in prime power dimensions . 88 3.4 A construction of quasi-orthogonal masa families in square dimensions 100 3.5 Excursion: Mutually unbiased bases and design theory . 104 4 Nice masa families and the generalised Clifford algebra 115 4.1 Nice unitary error bases . 115 4.2 Normal pairs of quasi-orthogonal masas . 124 4.3 Nice families of pairwise quasi-orthogonal masas . 134 4.4 Nice complete masa families in the generalised Clifford algebra . 142 4.5 Excursion: Concatenated normal pairs of masas . 154 5 Smid families 161 5.1 Equivalence classes of smid families and nice sets of masas . 162 5.2 Complete linear smid families in the matrix algebras M2(Fp) . 182 5.3 Smid families in M2(Fp), permutation polynomials, and Latin squares . 190 5.4 Smid families in small dimensions—some computer algebraic results . 204 Conclusion 209 Appendix 211 Bibliography 235 List of figures 245 List of symbols 247 Index 251 Introduction In the present thesis, we study families of pairwise quasi-orthogonal maximal abelian ∗-subalgebras—called masas in short—of the complex d×d-matrices, with a special emphasis on so-called nice masa families. Though doubtlessly of an intrinsic, purely mathematical interest, a very strong motivation for this topic stems from the field of quantum physics, since pairwise quasi-orthogonal masas in Md(C) can be considered as the algebraic counterpart of mutually unbiased bases (MUBs) in the Hilbert space Cd. Motivation and subject classification d A pair of orthonormal bases (x0,..., xd−1), (y0,..., yd−1) of C is said to be unbiased 2 if the identity j(xijyj)j = 1/d holds for all 0 ≤ i, j < d. Pairs of unbiased bases cor- respond to so-called complementary pairs of quantum physical measurements (observ- ables). Performing such measurements one after the other in any order, the second outcome is perfectly independent of the first. As one of the basic principles of quan- tum mechanics, this is not true in general. A set of MUBs for the Hilbert space Cd containing d + 1 members is called complete, for it is known that no larger sets can exist. Families of MUBs, complete families in par- ticular, have met a number of important applications in quantum information theory in the recent decades, such as optimal state determination, quantum teleportation, or quantum cryptography (see [35] for a good
Recommended publications
  • 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Introductory Remarks on Supersymmetry. 1.2
    1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Introductory remarks on supersymmetry. 1.2. Classical mechanics, the electromagnetic, and gravitational fields. 1.3. Principles of quantum mechanics. 1.4. Symmetries and projective unitary representations. 1.5. Poincar´esymmetry and particle classification. 1.6. Vector bundles and wave equations. The Maxwell, Dirac, and Weyl - equations. 1.7. Bosons and fermions. 1.8. Supersymmetry as the symmetry of Z2{graded geometry. 1.1. Introductory remarks on supersymmetry. The subject of supersymme- try (SUSY) is a part of the theory of elementary particles and their interactions and the still unfinished quest of obtaining a unified view of all the elementary forces in a manner compatible with quantum theory and general relativity. Supersymme- try was discovered in the early 1970's, and in the intervening years has become a major component of theoretical physics. Its novel mathematical features have led to a deeper understanding of the geometrical structure of spacetime, a theme to which great thinkers like Riemann, Poincar´e,Einstein, Weyl, and many others have contributed. Symmetry has always played a fundamental role in quantum theory: rotational symmetry in the theory of spin, Poincar´esymmetry in the classification of elemen- tary particles, and permutation symmetry in the treatment of systems of identical particles. Supersymmetry is a new kind of symmetry which was discovered by the physicists in the early 1970's. However, it is different from all other discoveries in physics in the sense that there has been no experimental evidence supporting it so far. Nevertheless an enormous effort has been expended by many physicists in developing it because of its many unique features and also because of its beauty and coherence1.
    [Show full text]
  • Can One Identify Two Unital JB $^* $-Algebras by the Metric Spaces
    CAN ONE IDENTIFY TWO UNITAL JB∗-ALGEBRAS BY THE METRIC SPACES DETERMINED BY THEIR SETS OF UNITARIES? MAR´IA CUETO-AVELLANEDA, ANTONIO M. PERALTA Abstract. Let M and N be two unital JB∗-algebras and let U(M) and U(N) denote the sets of all unitaries in M and N, respectively. We prove that the following statements are equivalent: (a) M and N are isometrically isomorphic as (complex) Banach spaces; (b) M and N are isometrically isomorphic as real Banach spaces; (c) There exists a surjective isometry ∆ : U(M) →U(N). We actually establish a more general statement asserting that, under some mild extra conditions, for each surjective isometry ∆ : U(M) → U(N) we can find a surjective real linear isometry Ψ : M → N which coincides with ∆ on the subset eiMsa . If we assume that M and N are JBW∗-algebras, then every surjective isometry ∆ : U(M) → U(N) admits a (unique) extension to a surjective real linear isometry from M onto N. This is an extension of the Hatori–Moln´ar theorem to the setting of JB∗-algebras. 1. Introduction Every surjective isometry between two real normed spaces X and Y is an affine mapping by the Mazur–Ulam theorem. It seems then natural to ask whether the existence of a surjective isometry between two proper subsets of X and Y can be employed to identify metrically both spaces. By a result of P. Mankiewicz (see [34]) every surjective isometry between convex bodies in two arbitrary normed spaces can be uniquely extended to an affine function between the spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • The Index of Normal Fredholm Elements of C* -Algebras
    proceedings of the american mathematical society Volume 113, Number 1, September 1991 THE INDEX OF NORMAL FREDHOLM ELEMENTS OF C*-ALGEBRAS J. A. MINGO AND J. S. SPIELBERG (Communicated by Palle E. T. Jorgensen) Abstract. Examples are given of normal elements of C*-algebras that are invertible modulo an ideal and have nonzero index, in contrast to the case of Fredholm operators on Hubert space. It is shown that this phenomenon occurs only along the lines of these examples. Let T be a bounded operator on a Hubert space. If the range of T is closed and both T and T* have a finite dimensional kernel then T is Fredholm, and the index of T is dim(kerT) - dim(kerT*). If T is normal then kerT = ker T*, so a normal Fredholm operator has index 0. Let us consider a generalization of the notion of Fredholm operator intro- duced by Atiyah. Let X be a compact Hausdorff space and consider continuous functions T: X —>B(H), where B(H) is the set of bounded linear operators on a separable infinite dimensional Hubert space with the norm topology. The set of such functions forms a C*- algebra C(X) <g>B(H). A function T is Fredholm if T(x) is Fredholm for each x . Atiyah [1, Appendix] showed how such an element has an index which is an element of K°(X). Suppose that T is Fredholm and T(x) is normal for each x. Is the index of T necessarily 0? There is a generalization of this question that we would like to consider.
    [Show full text]
  • Von Neumann Equivalence and Properly Proximal Groups 3
    VON NEUMANN EQUIVALENCE AND PROPERLY PROXIMAL GROUPS ISHAN ISHAN, JESSE PETERSON, AND LAUREN RUTH Abstract. We introduce a new equivalence relation on groups, which we call von Neu- ∗ mann equivalence, that is coarser than both measure equivalence and W -equivalence. We introduce a general procedure for inducing actions in this setting and use this to show that many analytic properties, such as amenability, property (T), and the Haagerup property, are preserved under von Neumann equivalence. We also show that proper proximality, which was defined recently in [BIP18] using dynamics, is also preserved under von Neu- mann equivalence. In particular, proper proximality is preserved under both measure ∗ equivalence and W -equivalence, and from this we obtain examples of non-inner amenable groups that are not properly proximal. 1. Introduction Two countable groups Γ and Λ are measure equivalent if they have commuting measure- preserving actions on a σ-finite measure space (Ω,m) such that the actions of Γ and Λ individually admit a finite-measure fundamental domain. This notion was introduced by Gromov in [Gro93, 0.5.E] as an analogy to the topological notion of being quasi-isometric for finitely generated groups. The basic example of measure equivalent groups is when Γ and Λ are lattices in the same locally compact group G. In this case, Γ and Λ act on the left and right of G respectively, and these actions preserve the Haar measure on G. For certain classes of groups, measure equivalence can be quite a course equivalence relation. For instance, the class of countable amenable groups splits into two measure equivalence classes, those that are finite, and those that are countably infinite [Dye59, Dye63, OW80].
    [Show full text]
  • Of Operator Algebras Vern I
    proceedings of the american mathematical society Volume 92, Number 2, October 1984 COMPLETELY BOUNDED HOMOMORPHISMS OF OPERATOR ALGEBRAS VERN I. PAULSEN1 ABSTRACT. Let A be a unital operator algebra. We prove that if p is a completely bounded, unital homomorphism of A into the algebra of bounded operators on a Hubert space, then there exists a similarity S, with ||S-1|| • ||S|| = ||p||cb, such that S_1p(-)S is a completely contractive homomorphism. We also show how Rota's theorem on operators similar to contractions and the result of Sz.-Nagy and Foias on the similarity of p-dilations to contractions can be deduced from this result. 1. Introduction. In [6] we proved that a homomorphism p of an operator algebra is similar to a completely contractive homomorphism if and only if p is completely bounded. It was known that if S is such a similarity, then ||5|| • ||5_11| > ||/9||cb- However, at the time we were unable to determine if one could choose the similarity such that ||5|| • US'-1!! = ||p||cb- When the operator algebra is a C*- algebra then Haagerup had shown [3] that such a similarity could be chosen. The purpose of the present note is to prove that for a general operator algebra, there exists a similarity S such that ||5|| • ||5_1|| = ||p||cb- Completely contractive homomorphisms are central to the study of the repre- sentation theory of operator algebras, since they are precisely the homomorphisms that can be dilated to a ^representation on some larger Hilbert space of any C*- algebra which contains the operator algebra.
    [Show full text]
  • Robot and Multibody Dynamics
    Robot and Multibody Dynamics Abhinandan Jain Robot and Multibody Dynamics Analysis and Algorithms 123 Abhinandan Jain Ph.D. Jet Propulsion Laboratory 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena, California 91109 USA [email protected] ISBN 978-1-4419-7266-8 e-ISBN 978-1-4419-7267-5 DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-7267-5 Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London Library of Congress Control Number: 2010938443 c Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) In memory of Guillermo Rodriguez, an exceptional scholar and a gentleman. To my parents, and to my wife, Karen. Preface “It is a profoundly erroneous truism, repeated by copybooks and by eminent people when they are making speeches, that we should cultivate the habit of thinking of what we are doing. The precise opposite is the case.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short Introduction to the Quantum Formalism[S]
    A short introduction to the quantum formalism[s] François David Institut de Physique Théorique CNRS, URA 2306, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France CEA, IPhT, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France [email protected] These notes are an elaboration on: (i) a short course that I gave at the IPhT-Saclay in May- June 2012; (ii) a previous letter [Dav11] on reversibility in quantum mechanics. They present an introductory, but hopefully coherent, view of the main formalizations of quantum mechanics, of their interrelations and of their common physical underpinnings: causality, reversibility and locality/separability. The approaches covered are mainly: (ii) the canonical formalism; (ii) the algebraic formalism; (iii) the quantum logic formulation. Other subjects: quantum information approaches, quantum correlations, contextuality and non-locality issues, quantum measurements, interpretations and alternate theories, quantum gravity, are only very briefly and superficially discussed. Most of the material is not new, but is presented in an original, homogeneous and hopefully not technical or abstract way. I try to define simply all the mathematical concepts used and to justify them physically. These notes should be accessible to young physicists (graduate level) with a good knowledge of the standard formalism of quantum mechanics, and some interest for theoretical physics (and mathematics). These notes do not cover the historical and philosophical aspects of quantum physics. arXiv:1211.5627v1 [math-ph] 24 Nov 2012 Preprint IPhT t12/042 ii CONTENTS Contents 1 Introduction 1-1 1.1 Motivation . 1-1 1.2 Organization . 1-2 1.3 What this course is not! . 1-3 1.4 Acknowledgements . 1-3 2 Reminders 2-1 2.1 Classical mechanics .
    [Show full text]
  • From String Theory and Moonshine to Vertex Algebras
    Preample From string theory and Moonshine to vertex algebras Bong H. Lian Department of Mathematics Brandeis University [email protected] Harvard University, May 22, 2020 Dedicated to the memory of John Horton Conway December 26, 1937 – April 11, 2020. Preample Acknowledgements: Speaker’s collaborators on the theory of vertex algebras: Andy Linshaw (Denver University) Bailin Song (University of Science and Technology of China) Gregg Zuckerman (Yale University) For their helpful input to this lecture, special thanks to An Huang (Brandeis University) Tsung-Ju Lee (Harvard CMSA) Andy Linshaw (Denver University) Preample Disclaimers: This lecture includes a brief survey of the period prior to and soon after the creation of the theory of vertex algebras, and makes no claim of completeness – the survey is intended to highlight developments that reflect the speaker’s own views (and biases) about the subject. As a short survey of early history, it will inevitably miss many of the more recent important or even towering results. Egs. geometric Langlands, braided tensor categories, conformal nets, applications to mirror symmetry, deformations of VAs, .... Emphases are placed on the mutually beneficial cross-influences between physics and vertex algebras in their concurrent early developments, and the lecture is aimed for a general audience. Preample Outline 1 Early History 1970s – 90s: two parallel universes 2 A fruitful perspective: vertex algebras as higher commutative algebras 3 Classification: cousins of the Moonshine VOA 4 Speculations The String Theory Universe 1968: Veneziano proposed a model (using the Euler beta function) to explain the ‘st-channel crossing’ symmetry in 4-meson scattering, and the Regge trajectory (an angular momentum vs binding energy plot for the Coulumb potential).
    [Show full text]
  • Geodesics of Projections in Von Neumann Algebras
    Geodesics of projections in von Neumann algebras Esteban Andruchow∗ November 5, 2020 Abstract Let be a von Neumann algebra and A the manifold of projections in . There is a A P A natural linear connection in A, which in the finite dimensional case coincides with the the Levi-Civita connection of theP Grassmann manifold of Cn. In this paper we show that two projections p, q can be joined by a geodesic, which has minimal length (with respect to the metric given by the usual norm of ), if and only if A p q⊥ p⊥ q, ∧ ∼ ∧ where stands for the Murray-von Neumann equivalence of projections. It is shown that the minimal∼ geodesic is unique if and only if p q⊥ = p⊥ q =0. If is a finite factor, any ∧ ∧ A pair of projections in the same connected component of A (i.e., with the same trace) can be joined by a minimal geodesic. P We explore certain relations with Jones’ index theory for subfactors. For instance, it is −1 shown that if are II1 factors with finite index [ : ] = t , then the geodesic N ⊂M M N 1/2 distance d(eN ,eM) between the induced projections eN and eM is d(eN ,eM) = arccos(t ). 2010 MSC: 58B20, 46L10, 53C22 Keywords: Projections, geodesics of projections, von Neumann algebras, index for subfac- tors. arXiv:2011.02013v1 [math.OA] 3 Nov 2020 1 Introduction ∗ If is a C -algebra, let A denote the set of (selfadjoint) projections in . A has a rich A P A P geometric structure, see for instante the papers [12] by H.
    [Show full text]
  • Noncommutative Geometry and Flavour Mixing
    Noncommutative geometry and flavour mixing prepared by Jose´ M. Gracia-Bond´ıa Department of Theoretical Physics Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain October 22, 2013 1 Introduction: the universality problem “The origin of the quark and lepton masses is shrouded in mystery” [1]. Some thirty years ago, attempts to solve the enigma based on textures of the quark mass matrices, purposedly reflecting mass hierarchies and “nearest-neighbour” interactions, were very popular. Now, in the late eighties, Branco, Lavoura and Mota [2] showed that, within the SM, the zero pattern 0a b 01 @c 0 dA; (1) 0 e 0 a central ingredient of Fritzsch’s well-known Ansatz for the mass matrices, is devoid of any particular physical meaning. (The top quark is above on top.) Although perhaps this was not immediately clear at the time, paper [2] marked a water- shed in the theory of flavour mixing. In algebraic terms, it establishes that the linear subspace of matrices of the form (1) is universal for the group action of unitaries effecting chiral basis transformations, that respect the charged-current term of the Lagrangian. That is, any mass matrix can be transformed to that form without modifying the corresponding CKM matrix. To put matters in perspective, consider the unitary group acting by similarity on three-by- three matrices. The classical triangularization theorem by Schur ensures that the zero patterns 0a 0 01 0a b c1 @b c 0A; @0 d eA (2) d e f 0 0 f are universal in this sense. However, proof that the zero pattern 0a b 01 @0 c dA e 0 f 1 is universal was published [3] just three years ago! (Any off-diagonal n(n−1)=2 zero pattern with zeroes at some (i j) and no zeroes at the matching ( ji), is universal in this sense, for complex n × n matrices.) Fast-forwarding to the present time, notwithstanding steady experimental progress [4] and a huge amount of theoretical work by many authors, we cannot be sure of being any closer to solving the “Meroitic” problem [5] of divining the spectrum behind the known data.
    [Show full text]
  • Operator Algebras: an Informal Overview 3
    OPERATOR ALGEBRAS: AN INFORMAL OVERVIEW FERNANDO LLEDO´ Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Operator algebras 2 2.1. What are operator algebras? 2 2.2. Differences and analogies between C*- and von Neumann algebras 3 2.3. Relevance of operator algebras 5 3. Different ways to think about operator algebras 6 3.1. Operator algebras as non-commutative spaces 6 3.2. Operator algebras as a natural universe for spectral theory 6 3.3. Von Neumann algebras as symmetry algebras 7 4. Some classical results 8 4.1. Operator algebras in functional analysis 8 4.2. Operator algebras in harmonic analysis 10 4.3. Operator algebras in quantum physics 11 References 13 Abstract. In this article we give a short and informal overview of some aspects of the theory of C*- and von Neumann algebras. We also mention some classical results and applications of these families of operator algebras. 1. Introduction arXiv:0901.0232v1 [math.OA] 2 Jan 2009 Any introduction to the theory of operator algebras, a subject that has deep interrelations with many mathematical and physical disciplines, will miss out important elements of the theory, and this introduction is no ex- ception. The purpose of this article is to give a brief and informal overview on C*- and von Neumann algebras which are the main actors of this summer school. We will also mention some of the classical results in the theory of operator algebras that have been crucial for the development of several areas in mathematics and mathematical physics. Being an overview we can not provide details. Precise definitions, statements and examples can be found in [1] and references cited therein.
    [Show full text]
  • Intertwining Operator Superalgebras and Vertex Tensor Categories for Superconformal Algebras, Ii
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 354, Number 1, Pages 363{385 S 0002-9947(01)02869-0 Article electronically published on August 21, 2001 INTERTWINING OPERATOR SUPERALGEBRAS AND VERTEX TENSOR CATEGORIES FOR SUPERCONFORMAL ALGEBRAS, II YI-ZHI HUANG AND ANTUN MILAS Abstract. We construct the intertwining operator superalgebras and vertex tensor categories for the N = 2 superconformal unitary minimal models and other related models. 0. Introduction It has been known that the N = 2 Neveu-Schwarz superalgebra is one of the most important algebraic objects realized in superstring theory. The N =2su- perconformal field theories constructed from its discrete unitary representations of central charge c<3 are among the so-called \minimal models." In the physics liter- ature, there have been many conjectural connections among Calabi-Yau manifolds, Landau-Ginzburg models and these N = 2 unitary minimal models. In fact, the physical construction of mirror manifolds [GP] used the conjectured relations [Ge1] [Ge2] between certain particular Calabi-Yau manifolds and certain N =2super- conformal field theories (Gepner models) constructed from unitary minimal models (see [Gr] for a survey). To establish these conjectures as mathematical theorems, it is necessary to construct the N = 2 unitary minimal models mathematically and to study their structures in detail. In the present paper, we apply the theory of intertwining operator algebras developed by the first author in [H3], [H5] and [H6] and the tensor product theory for modules for a vertex operator algebra developed by Lepowsky and the first author in [HL1]{[HL6], [HL8] and [H1] to construct the intertwining operator algebras and vertex tensor categories for N = 2 superconformal unitary minimal models.
    [Show full text]