Tesla Flying Machine.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Tesla's Flying Machine Description Nikola Tesla's "flying machine", contrarily to what many have been lead to believe by his misleading late VTOL patent, was not an aerodynamically based one, but electropropulsive. While his VTOL patent was far ahead of his time, it was of aerodynamic design with wings and propeller - this was *not* his "flying machine". There are several references to his "ideal flying machine" in his interviews and articles. Most have been put together in a pdf with footnotes in the files area for everyone that is interested in researching this occulted but prime moving life objective. It would be also appropriate to straighten out some facts regarding Tesla's life. These facts are: - UFOs are real, Man-made electropropulsive crafts based on Tesla Technology - The alien scenario is a misleading "charade" to get people "hooked" - Nikola Tesla was never "contacted" by any alien entity! - He "worked out" his Dynamic Theory of Gravity by 1893-4 - The US government refused his offer to build and develop this machine, so he most probably turned to the Germans *prior* to WWII as he already had sold them a generator system. - All other saucer shaped projects, information and data (AVRO, Schauberger repulsine, jet aerodynes etc) have been most probably released for misdirection and to arrange confusion. - The undeniable occultation of Tesla's name and accomplishments from mainstream media and academia underline an unexplainable gesture - why else go to such great lengths than to hide something so important? Excerpt from the New York Herald Tribune Oct 15, 1911: “And it makes the aeroplane practical,” I suggested. “Not the aeroplane, the flying machine,” responded Dr. Tesla. “Now you have struck the point in which I am most deeply interested — the object toward which I have been devoting my energies for more than twenty years — the dream of my life. It was in seeking the means of making the perfect flying machine that I developed this engine. 9 Dracozny, "lifter" technology is only half of the game - it really won't yield practical results so to speak. The thrust is only a few grams and can only displace so little in that setup. The complete setup is Tesla's "p2" system, involving HV HF AC currents and a HV DC negative brush discharge *together*, electrifying a hull. The lifter is an "open" setup, only utilizing DC. A hint is given when "pulsed" DC is used on the lifter, as the performance is enhanced, but the setup does not take advantage due to a missing hull or cage with which "tubes of force" can be manipulated/synthesized. I would suggest anyone who wants to try this to use a sphere or whatever "empty" metal object, preferably with a small opening through which a HV source can be fed through an umbilical cord with enough isolation. My first attempt utilized a pseudo saucer shaped iron object, a small Tesla coil and a color TV output. Incredibly I got better results with the DC output of the TV set: the hull was suspended with rubber bands from the ceiling and it would wobble and oscillate when the discharges were fed to the hull. Sometimes it would oscillate from side to side and the next disharge would make it halt instantly, or it would increase the oscillation. If you think of it, any discharge to the hull would create a virtual LC circuit with ground through the atmosphere (as with a TC) and it will ring at a very high frequency. It is clear that 27KV are nowhere near the necessary "Voltage pressure" to see things happen, as over 200KV are needed to probably just get things going. Size is not an issue, the bigger actually the better. Only corona leakage is and must be considered when upscaling. Tesla also used "Ultraviolet" sources to ionize the atmosphere and make it conduct better which I believe he also used to "bring in" more tubes of force and enhance the effect. I don't think just a TC would fly, you need a hull to encase it. Consider also that the "standard TC" was only a brief part of Tesla's "evolution" line where he was searching for the most appropriate "power source". The next step was his Pancake Coil which was more ideal and could handle high voltages in less space when encased and isolated well due to it's flat spiral configuration. Everything he actually developed was for a purpose, and the flat pancake coil was for this type of power source. Infact, from the "method of signalling" and "system of signalling" patents you can see that from one single HF alternator he could energize 2 coils, one tuned to an AC 1/2 wave and the other to a DC brush 1/4 or 3/4 wave output, hence the name "p2", 2 potentials. He put this "method" to good work, not only to just send "signals" evidently. Regards Luke 12 Dracozny, let me re-iterate what I meant: not one bifilar coil but 2 seperate pancake coils, one for AC and the other for the DC brush powered by the same HF alternator. The coils would be attached to the hull in a "real" scenario with proper isolation. The DC brush is responsible for "bringing in" tubes of force, or what Tesla calls the "veritable rope" which is what keeps or holds the ship in position or propels it to any desired destination ("a great propelling force"). To augment this "veritable rope" Tesla developed a bulb, first in vacuum, then only encapsulated in glass - an aluminum hemisphere. This is what he used to "conduct" also power to his remote devices, and was one of the devices in his "death ray" or Teleforce machine, depending on how it was set up and focused. The critical part is electrifying the hull with AC and contemporarily feeding it a DC brush - but this can be overcome by using "pressure controlled" brush discharges towards the hull to control the brush. The "bulbs" are positioned above (for bouyancy) and in the desired direction of travel. A completely "inertia free" hull will be solely electrified using HV HF AC currents. It will be free to "tumble", rotate or flip so to speak in any direction - good evidence is the heavy precession problem the early saucers were afflicted with. Stability seems to have been reached using microwaves in the IR spectrum around the rim to counter act precession. I think a good testbed is the suspended hull powered by only HV HF AC with such a pancake coil. If there is a good "interaction" the hull will lift being pulled up by the rubber bands as it will "weigh less" or even go weightless. Regards Luke 14 Yes that is what I meant: the best setup would be to have a large enough hull to contain a small pancake coil suspended by isolated rubber bands - only the HF pilot voltage could be fed from the outside. There are ground problems though which I did not mention. Considering a large hull, there would be another internal hull, isolated and with enough dielectric to avoid breakdown between the external and internal hull which is the ship's "floating" ground. Both coils' ground are connected to this internal hull. Ideally the coils would be located between the internal shielded hull and the external hull away from operators. Luke 17 Jeff, as you have seen unfortunately it is difficult with all the brainwashing propaganda to keep the term "UFO" dissociated from "Alien". Normally, when people think of a UFO, they think of ET. When you tell them there's really no ET other than the "BIG LIES" and that Nikola Tesla is the man behind this occulted flying machine all sorts of wierd ideas start popping up. Cut these out, and you are left with a handful of people that really see the picture. This is obvious to me, having researched Tesla's documents, articles and lectures for years, but not so obvious to others who seem to depend on "webinfo". It is also obvious to me that these crafts are no regular aerodynamic ones, as some still try to describe them (I have been lucky enough also to see them in action). I am glad you wish to get the information out, this is what I have been trying to do for the last 3 years. The "technology" is now over 100 years old, since Tesla first verified and tested it. WWII came along and since then it has been taken "undergound" by the various governments with all their lies and charades. Now they are playing with colorful lights to get even more people on the "alien bandwagon" and continue refining the technology. Regarding your note on cigar UFOs: during WWII, the Nazis used this technology in stripped U-boot hulls, which were pressurized and contained batteries and various equipment, perfect also for an airborne craft. The hulls were fitted with the coils and HV HF alternator generators which were at first driven by their own diesel engines and subsequently by a different kind of generator. They also used spherical crafts (kugelblitz) which lit up due to their corona. What the real problem is, that researchers are working with the wrong set of "standards". It is obvious that since such a craft exists, that the technology behind it is really not complex, but based on ether mechanics and no Relativism (since Tesla despised Relativists). Thinking in terms of "curving space-time" and "emitting gravity waves" is totally out of line and only disinformation. This is the highest and toughest wall to overthrow.