DOCSLIB.ORG

Nominations to the Us Department of Commerce and the Federal Trade

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nominations to the Us Department of Commerce and the Federal Trade S. HRG. 112–469 NOMINATIONS TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 15, 2011 Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 74–999 PDF WASHINGTON : 2012 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 09:37 Jul 18, 2012 Jkt 074999 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\DOCS\74999.TXT SCOM1 PsN: JACKIE SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West Virginia, Chairman DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas, Ranking JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine BARBARA BOXER, California JIM DEMINT, South Carolina BILL NELSON, Florida JOHN THUNE, South Dakota MARIA CANTWELL, Washington ROGER F. WICKER, Mississippi FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia MARK PRYOR, Arkansas ROY BLUNT, Missouri CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri JOHN BOOZMAN, Arkansas AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota PATRICK J. TOOMEY, Pennsylvania TOM UDALL, New Mexico MARCO RUBIO, Florida MARK WARNER, Virginia KELLY AYOTTE, New Hampshire MARK BEGICH, Alaska DEAN HELLER, Nevada ELLEN L. DONESKI, Staff Director JAMES REID, Deputy Staff Director TODD BERTOSON, Republican Staff Director JARROD THOMPSON, Republican Deputy Staff Director REBECCA SEIDEL, Republican General Counsel and Chief Investigator (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 09:37 Jul 18, 2012 Jkt 074999 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\DOCS\74999.TXT SCOM1 PsN: JACKIE C O N T E N T S Page Hearing held on November 15, 2011 ...................................................................... 1 Statement of Senator Rockefeller ........................................................................... 1 Statement of Senator Lautenberg .......................................................................... 2 Statement of Senator Hutchison ............................................................................ 4 Statement of Senator Boxer .................................................................................... 5 Statement of Senator Pryor .................................................................................... 62 Statement of Senator McCaskill ............................................................................. 64 Statement of Senator Klobuchar ............................................................................ 66 Statement of Senator Ayotte ................................................................................... 68 Statement of Senator Boozman .............................................................................. 71 WITNESSES Hon. Herb Kohl, U.S. Senator from Wisconsin ..................................................... 3 Hon. Jon D. Leibowitz, Nomination to be Commissioner and Chairman, Fed- eral Trade Commission ........................................................................................ 6 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 8 Biographical information ................................................................................. 9 Dr. Rebecca M. Blank, Nomination to be Deputy Secretary, U.S. Department of Commerce ......................................................................................................... 25 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 26 Biographical information ................................................................................. 28 Maureen K. Ohlhausen, Nomination to be Commissioner, Federal Trade Com- mission .................................................................................................................. 47 Prepared statement .......................................................................................... 49 Biographical information ................................................................................. 50 APPENDIX Response to written questions submitted to Hon. Jon D. Leibowitz by: Hon. John D. Rockefeller IV ............................................................................ 79 Hon. Barbara Boxer ......................................................................................... 81 Hon. Maria Cantwell ........................................................................................ 82 Hon. Frank R. Lautenberg ............................................................................... 87 Hon. Mark Pryor ............................................................................................... 87 Hon. Claire McCaskill ...................................................................................... 88 Hon. Tom Udall ................................................................................................ 90 Hon. Mark Warner ........................................................................................... 91 Hon. Mark Begich ............................................................................................. 94 Hon. John Thune .............................................................................................. 94 Hon. Roger F. Wicker ....................................................................................... 95 Hon. John Boozman ......................................................................................... 97 Hon. Patrick J. Toomey .................................................................................... 98 Hon. Kelly Ayotte ............................................................................................. 107 Response to written questions submitted to Dr. Rebecca M. Blank by: Hon. John D. Rockefeller IV ............................................................................ 109 Hon. Maria Cantwell ........................................................................................ 110 Hon. Mark Pryor ............................................................................................... 111 Hon. Mark Warner ........................................................................................... 112 Hon. Mark Begich ............................................................................................. 115 Hon. Olympia J. Snowe .................................................................................... 117 Response to written questions submitted to Maureen K. Ohlhausen by: Hon. John D Rockefeller IV ............................................................................. 119 Hon. Bill Nelson ............................................................................................... 120 Hon. Maria Cantwell ........................................................................................ 121 (III) VerDate Nov 24 2008 09:37 Jul 18, 2012 Jkt 074999 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\DOCS\74999.TXT SCOM1 PsN: JACKIE IV Page Response to written questions submitted to Maureen K. Ohlhausen by— Continued Hon. Mark Warner ........................................................................................... 123 Hon. Mark Begich ............................................................................................. 124 Hon. Roger F. Wicker ....................................................................................... 125 Hon. John Boozman ......................................................................................... 127 VerDate Nov 24 2008 09:37 Jul 18, 2012 Jkt 074999 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\DOCS\74999.TXT SCOM1 PsN: JACKIE NOMINATIONS TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2011 U.S. SENATE, COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION, Washington, DC. The Committee met, pursuant to notice, at 2:29 p.m. in room SR–253, Russell Senate Office Building, Hon. John D. Rockefeller IV, Chairman of the Committee, presiding. OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, U.S. SENATOR FROM WEST VIRGINIA The CHAIRMAN. The hearing will come to order, please. I want to welcome and to congratulate the three nominees who are appearing before the Commerce Committee today. And you, too, Senator Kohl. You’re already in the Senate, so I as- sume we don’t have to approve you, but you’re here and we wel- come you. I value your commitment to public service, and I always say this because I mean it, given what people think about public service these days and politics these days doesn’t in any way de- tract from the majesty of the experience of following public service and drilling down and keeping drilling down and expanding your knowledge. We can’t seem to make bills pass well enough to satisfy the needs of the country, but that does not take away from the courage and the steadfast, and I believe the awesomeness of those who vol- unteer to come and do this. So thank you for that attitude. I’m going to start today with Jon Leibowitz, who’s been nomi- nated to have a second term as Commissioner and Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission. I’m a fan. During his seven-year term as a Commissioner and during the past three years as Chairman, Mr. Leibowitz has shown that he understands the vital role of the FTC as
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EPIC Statement 1 Social Media Privacy Senate Judiciary and Commerce Committees April 9, 2018
    April 9, 2018 Senator Chuck Grassley, Chairman Senator Dianne Feinstein, Ranking Member Committee on the Judiciary 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Senator John Thune, Chairman Senator Bill Nelson, Ranking Members Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation 512 Dirksen Senate Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Senate Commerce Committee: We write to you regarding the joint hearing this week on “Facebook, Social Media Privacy, and the Use and Abuse of Data.”1 We appreciate your interest in this important issue. For many years, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (“EPIC”) has worked with both the Judiciary Committee and the Commerce Committee to help protect the privacy rights of Americans.2 In this statement from EPIC, we outline the history of Facebook’s 2011 Consent Order with the Federal Trade Commission, point to key developments (including the failure of the FTC to enforce the Order), and make a few preliminary recommendations. Our assessment is that the Cambridge Analytica breach, as well as a range of threats to consumer privacy and democratic institutions, could have been prevented if the Commission had enforced the Order. 1 Facebook, Social Media Privacy, and the Use and Abuse of Data: Hearing Before the S. Comm. on the Judiciary, 115th Cong. (2018), https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/facebook-social-media- privacy-and-the-use-and-abuse-of-data (April 10, 2018). 2 See, e.g., The Video Privacy Protection Act: Protecting Viewer Privacy in the 21st Century: Hearing Before the S. Comm on the Judiciary, 112th Cong.
    [Show full text]
  • June 7, 2010 ANALYSIS of the FTC's DECISION NOT to BLOCK
    June 7, 2010 ANALYSIS OF THE FTC’S DECISION NOT TO BLOCK GOOGLE’S ACQUISITION OF ADMOB Randy Stutz and Richard Brunell* Introduction On May 21, 2010, after months of investigation, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that it would not challenge Google’s $750 million acquisition of AdMob, a mobile advertising network and mobile ad solutions and services provider.1 In this white paper, we present AAI’s analysis of the FTC’s decision. The FTC found that, but for recent developments concerning Apple, the acquisition “appeared likely to lead to a substantial lessening of competition in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act.” According to the FTC, Google and AdMob “currently are the two leading mobile advertising networks, and the Commission was concerned about the loss of head-to-head competition between them.” The companies “generate the most revenue among mobile advertising networks, and both companies are particularly strong in … performance ad networks,” i.e. those networks that sell advertising by auction on a “per click” or other direct response basis. Without necessarily defining a relevant market, the Commission apparently saw a likelihood of unilateral anticompetitive effects, as it found “each of the merging parties viewed the other as its primary competitor, and that each firm made business decisions in direct response to this perceived competitive threat.” Yet, Apple’s acquisition of the third largest mobile ad network, Quattro Wireless, in December 2009, and its introduction of its own mobile advertising network, iAd, as part of its iPhone applications package, convinced the FTC that the anticompetitive effects of the acquisition “should [be] mitigate[d].” The Commission “ha[d] reason to believe that Apple * Randy Stutz is a Research Fellow and Richard Brunell is the Director of Legal Advocacy of the American Antitrust Institute (AAI), a non-profit research and advocacy organization devoted to advancing the role of competition in the economy, protecting consumers, and sustaining the vitality of the antitrust laws.
    [Show full text]
  • July 23, 2020 the Honorable William P. Barr Attorney General United
    July 23, 2020 The Honorable William P. Barr Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530 Dear Attorney General Barr: We write to raise serious concerns regarding Google LLC’s (Google) proposed acquisition of Fitbit, Inc. (Fitbit).1 We are aware that the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice is investigating this transaction and has issued a Second Request to gather additional information about the acquisition’s potential effects on competition.2 Amid reports that Google is offering modest, short-term concessions to overseas enforcers to avoid a full-scale investigation of the transaction in Europe,3 we write to urge the Division to continue with its efforts to conduct a thorough and comprehensive review of this proposed merger and to take any and all enforcement action warranted by the law and the evidence. It is no exaggeration to say that Google is under intense antitrust scrutiny across the globe. As you know, the company has been under investigation for potential anticompetitive conduct across a number of product markets by the Department and numerous state attorneys general, as well as by a number of foreign competition enforcers, some of which are also reviewing the proposed Fitbit acquisition. Competition concerns about Google are widespread and bipartisan. Against this backdrop, in November 2019, Google announced its proposed acquisition of Fitbit for $2.1 billion, a staggering 71 percent premium over Fitbit’s pre-announcement stock price.4 Fitbit—which makes wearable technology devices, such as smartwatches and fitness trackers— has more than 28 million active users submitting sensitive location and health data to the company.
    [Show full text]
  • If Google Is a 'Bad' Monopoly, What Should Be Done?
    If Google Is A 'Bad' Monopoly, What Should Be Done? Google Inc. is currently subject to antitrust investigations by state attorneys general in the United States, as well as antitrust authorities in the European Union. Google and its allies have mounted a vigorous public defense, arguing that Google’s activity should be immune from antitrust scrutiny or that imposing a remedy on Google would transform antitrust enforcers into some kind of undesirable “software regulatory agency,” which would threaten innovation in the Internet. These arguments are reminiscent of the claims made 20 years ago that antitrust analysis was too outdated to apply to high-tech industries. That argument was rejected then, and it should be rejected now. Exclusionary conduct by a dominant firm can distort fair competition in high-tech markets, Samuel Miller just as in more traditional markets. Antitrust remedies can, and should, be imposed to make sure that a dominant company does not improperly keep rivals out of its markets or improperly strengthen its dominant position, to the detriment of consumers and innovation. EU Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia rejected Google’s original proposals to resolve claims of anti-competitive conduct in July 2013, and is currently considering a revised proposal submitted by Google. So what remedy proposals would make sense? This article will outline potential antitrust remedies that may appropriately be imposed upon Google, assuming antitrust authorities or courts determine that Google has violated the antitrust laws. What Is an Illegal Monopoly? A company violates Section 2 of the Sherman Act when it acquires or maintains or “monopoly power” in a relevant market by “exclusionary” conduct.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Leader Economic Development for the Regions of Los Angeles County Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation Spring/Summer 2005
    Business Leader Economic Development for the Regions of Los Angeles County www.laedc.org Los Angeles County Economic Development Corporation Spring/Summer 2005 In This Issue: LAEDC REACHES 100,000 JOBS MILESTONE Business Assistance Program Sets a New Standard for Years to Come á President’s Annual Report 2004-2005 A testament to LAEDC’s mission to “attract, retain and grow á Story and photos from businesses and jobs in the re- the 9th Annual Eddy gions of LA County,” LAEDC Awards celebrates its new milestone of having attracted and retained á LAEDC/WTCA 2004 100,532 jobs from 1996 to Asia Mission Report April 2005. Those jobs trans- late to $3.5 billion in annual á Membership News and economic impact from salaries Updates and $65 million in annual tax revenue benefit to Los Angeles á And much more! County. At the May 19 Membership Meeting, Los Angeles County Supervisor Michael Antonovich presented the LAEDC with a special commendation from the County Supervisors for this im- portant achievement. Standing from left to right: Westside Regional Manager (RM) Libby Wil- liams, Former RM Judy Turner, San Fernando Valley RM Alex Rosas, Business Development Coordinator Bob Machuca, Former RM Saul Rodney F. Banks, Chairman of Gomez, Gateway Cities RM Barbara Levine, LAEDC Vice President Busi- the Board of the LAEDC said, ness Development Greg Whitney, Former RM Elaine Cullen, Undersecre- “We are pleased to have tary Business, Transportation & Housing Barry Sedlik, Former RM David reached this milestone in job Myers, Antelope & Santa Clarita Valleys RM Henry Leyva, Metro & South creation and retention.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile Developer's Guide to the Galaxy
    Don’t Panic MOBILE DEVELOPER’S GUIDE TO THE GALAXY U PD A TE D & EX TE ND 12th ED EDITION published by: Services and Tools for All Mobile Platforms Enough Software GmbH + Co. KG Sögestrasse 70 28195 Bremen Germany www.enough.de Please send your feedback, questions or sponsorship requests to: [email protected] Follow us on Twitter: @enoughsoftware 12th Edition February 2013 This Developer Guide is licensed under the Creative Commons Some Rights Reserved License. Editors: Marco Tabor (Enough Software) Julian Harty Izabella Balce Art Direction and Design by Andrej Balaz (Enough Software) Mobile Developer’s Guide Contents I Prologue 1 The Galaxy of Mobile: An Introduction 1 Topology: Form Factors and Usage Patterns 2 Star Formation: Creating a Mobile Service 6 The Universe of Mobile Operating Systems 12 About Time and Space 12 Lost in Space 14 Conceptional Design For Mobile 14 Capturing The Idea 16 Designing User Experience 22 Android 22 The Ecosystem 24 Prerequisites 25 Implementation 28 Testing 30 Building 30 Signing 31 Distribution 32 Monetization 34 BlackBerry Java Apps 34 The Ecosystem 35 Prerequisites 36 Implementation 38 Testing 39 Signing 39 Distribution 40 Learn More 42 BlackBerry 10 42 The Ecosystem 43 Development 51 Testing 51 Signing 52 Distribution 54 iOS 54 The Ecosystem 55 Technology Overview 57 Testing & Debugging 59 Learn More 62 Java ME (J2ME) 62 The Ecosystem 63 Prerequisites 64 Implementation 67 Testing 68 Porting 70 Signing 71 Distribution 72 Learn More 4 75 Windows Phone 75 The Ecosystem 76 Implementation 82 Testing
    [Show full text]
  • GOOGLE ADVERTISING TOOLS (FORMERLY DOUBLECLICK) OVERVIEW Last Updated October 1, 2019
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
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    2019 ANNUAL REPORT OUR MISSION The Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation mobilizes people and resources to provide access to high quality care and leads research for a cure so people with pulmonary fibrosis will live longer, healthier lives. DEAR FRIENDS, At the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation (PFF), our efforts to educate the public, patients, and healthcare providers about pulmonary fibrosis (PF) are complemented by our significant support of the important research that leads to improved drug therapies. Your support has helped the Foundation achieve new goals to improve the lives of patients and their families everywhere. The PFF Patient Registry is a centerpiece of that research support. With the completion of phase I of patient enrollment, the Registry has reached an important developmental milestone—but our work is far from over. A growing body of current research is based on the invaluable data generated by the Registry and its associated biorepository, but much more participation and data are needed, particularly for clinical trials. In response to aggressive targeting of PF patients, the Foundation’s medical advisory board updated its positon statement on stem cell therapies. In the statement, we urge patients to consider stem cell therapies only in an FDA- approved clinical trial setting. Our website is a valuable resource to find myriad ILD-specific clinical trials in safe environments. In addition, the Foundation enjoyed unprecedented success during Pulmonary Fibrosis Awareness Month. Thanks to the efforts of the PF community nationwide, more than 1.2 million people on social media read a message from the PFF about this disease. As we work toward improved treatment options for tomorrow, the Foundation is also focused on the quality of life for PF patients today.
    [Show full text]
  • FTC Nominee Expected to Oppose Broad Privacy Rules
    Portfolio Media. Inc. | 860 Broadway, 6th Floor | New York, NY 10003 | www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 | Fax: +1 646 783 7161 | [email protected] FTC Nominee Expected To Oppose Broad Privacy Rules By Bibeka Shrestha Law360, New York (September 2, 2011) -- If confirmed, Federal Trade Commission nominee Maureen Ohlhausen would likely call for greater transparency about privacy practices but fight comprehensive restrictions on the collection and use of consumer information, according to privacy experts. Should the Senate greenlight President Barack Obama's pick, Ohlhausen would leave her partner position at Wilkinson Barker Knauer LLP's privacy, data protection and cybersecurity practice to join the FTC's five-member board as its second Republican commissioner for a seven-year term starting Sept. 26. Ohlhausen would replace Republican Commissioner William Kovacic, who has served on the commission since January 2006. Experts say it would be surprising for the technology policy heavyweight to meekly sign on to FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz's privacy agenda, which seeks to set a minimum standard of conduct for companies across the board that collect personal information, rather than focusing on specific sectors like the financial industry. "As a general matter, I do not think that she would not support 'substantive' regulation — restrictions on what companies can collect and disclose or how they can use the information that they collect," said Andrew Smith, a Morrison & Foerster LLP partner who worked closely with Ohlhausen while at the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection. Leibowitz has sought to move past the notice-and-choice mechanism espoused under the George W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Heart of the Matter
    american academy of arts & sciences The Heart of the Matter The Humanities and Social Sciences for a vibrant, competitive, and secure nation Who will lead America into a bright future? Citizens who are educated in the broadest possible sense, so that they can participate in their own governance and engage with the world. An adaptable and creative workforce. Experts in national security, equipped with the cultural understanding, knowledge of social dynamics, and language proficiency to lead our foreign service and military through complex global conflicts. Elected officials and a broader public who exercise civil political discourse, founded on an appreciation of the ways our differences and commonalities have shaped our rich history. We must prepare the next generation to be these future leaders. commission on the humanities and social sciences The Heart of the Matter american academy of arts & sciences Cambridge, Massachusetts © 2013 by the American Academy of Arts and Sciences All rights reserved. isbn: 0-87724-096-5 The views expressed in this volume are those held by the contributors and are not necessarily those of the Officers and Fellows of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. The Heart of the Matter is available online at http://www.amacad.org. Please direct inquiries to: American Academy of Arts & Sciences 136 Irving Street Cambridge, MA 02138-1996 Phone: 617-576-5000 Email: [email protected] www.amacad.org 5 Members of the Commission on the Humanities and Social Sciences 6 Acknowledgments 9 Executive Summary 15 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • The Boeing Company
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549-4561 Januar 27,2010 Michael F. Lorn Corporate Secretay The Boeing Company. 100 N Riverside MC 5003-1001 Chicago, IL 60606-1596 Re: The Boeing Company Incoming letter dated December 21, 2009 Dear Mr. Lorn: This is in response to your letter dated December 21, 2009 concerning the shareholder proposal submitted to Boeing by John Chevedden. We also received letters from the proponent on Januar 5,2010, Januar 19,2010, Januar 19,2010 and Januar 20,2010. Our response is attched to the enclosed photocopy of your correspondence. By doing this, we avoid having to recite or sumarize the facts set forth in the correspondence. Copies of all of the correspondence also wil be provided to the proponent. In connection with this matter, your attention is directed to the enclosure, which sets forth a brief discussion of the Division's informal procedures regarding shareholder proposals. Sincerely, Heather L. Maples Senior Special Counsel Enclosures cc: John Chevedden *** FISMA & OMB Memorandum M-07-16 *** Januar 27, 2010 Response of the Offce of Chief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance Re: The Boeing Company Incoming letter dated December 21, 2009 The proposal asks the board to take the steps necessar to amend the bylaws and each applicable governng document to give holders of 10% of Boeing's outstading common stock (or the lowest percentage allowed by law above 10%) the power to call a special shareowner meeting and fuher provides that such bylaw and/or charer text shall not have any exception or exclusion conditions (to the fullest extent permtted by state law) that apply only to shareowners but not to management and/or the board.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 115 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 115 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 164 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, MAY 9, 2018 No. 75 House of Representatives The House met at 10 a.m. and was housing. Now, in my district, in the ownership is out of the question. Even called to order by the Speaker pro tem- East Bay in northern California, the as a dedicated public servant, I can’t pore (Mr. COMER). average renter in Oakland would be afford to work in urban schools in the f forced to spend a staggering—mind Bay area. you, staggering—70 percent of their in- A former student wrote me: I had to DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO come on housing if they were to move withdraw from classes at UC Berkeley TEMPORE today. That is 70 percent. Clearly, the so I could find stable housing and The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- affordable housing crisis is off the scale enough income to afford my monthly fore the House the following commu- in my district. rent. nication from the Speaker: In April, I sent an email to my con- Mr. Speaker, our community, our WASHINGTON, DC, stituents asking for their stories and country, cannot function without May 9, 2018. suggestions on how to address this very nurses, teachers, or young people living I hereby appoint the Honorable JAMES important issue. Today I would like to in decent affordable housing. We need COMER to act as Speaker pro tempore on this share just a few of those stories which to solve this crisis before it is too late.
    [Show full text]