Priority NSW Plants for Post-Fire Field Assessment List Current at 18 November 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests?
Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? An Analysis of the State of the Nation’s Regional Forest Agreements Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? An Analysis of the State of the Nation’s Regional Forest Agreements The Wilderness Society. 2020, Creating Jobs, Protecting Forests? The State of the Nation’s RFAs, The Wilderness Society, Melbourne, Australia Table of contents 4 Executive summary Printed on 100% recycled post-consumer waste paper 5 Key findings 6 Recommendations Copyright The Wilderness Society Ltd 7 List of abbreviations All material presented in this publication is protected by copyright. 8 Introduction First published September 2020. 9 1. Background and legal status 12 2. Success of the RFAs in achieving key outcomes Contact: [email protected] | 1800 030 641 | www.wilderness.org.au 12 2.1 Comprehensive, Adequate, Representative Reserve system 13 2.1.1 Design of the CAR Reserve System Cover image: Yarra Ranges, Victoria | mitchgreenphotos.com 14 2.1.2 Implementation of the CAR Reserve System 15 2.1.3 Management of the CAR Reserve System 16 2.2 Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management 16 2.2.1 Maintaining biodiversity 20 2.2.2 Contributing factors to biodiversity decline 21 2.3 Security for industry 22 2.3.1 Volume of logs harvested 25 2.3.2 Employment 25 2.3.3 Growth in the plantation sector of Australia’s wood products industry 27 2.3.4 Factors contributing to industry decline 28 2.4 Regard to relevant research and projects 28 2.5 Reviews 32 3. Ability of the RFAs to meet intended outcomes into the future 32 3.1 Climate change 32 3.1.1 The role of forests in climate change mitigation 32 3.1.2 Climate change impacts on conservation and native forestry 33 3.2 Biodiversity loss/resource decline 33 3.2.1 Altered fire regimes 34 3.2.2 Disease 35 3.2.3 Pest species 35 3.3 Competing forest uses and values 35 3.3.1 Water 35 3.3.2 Carbon credits 36 3.4 Changing industries, markets and societies 36 3.5 International and national agreements 37 3.6 Legal concerns 37 3.7 Findings 38 4. -
National Parks and Wildlife Amendment (Protected Native Plants) Order 2009 Under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974
2009 No 138 New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Amendment (Protected Native Plants) Order 2009 under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 MARIE BASHIR, Governor I, Professor Marie Bashir AC, CVO, Governor of the State of New South Wales, with the advice of the Executive Council, and in pursuance of section 115 (2) of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974, make the following Order. Dated, this 8th day of April 2009. By Her Excellency’s Command, CARMEL TEBBUTT, M.P., Minister for Climate Change and the Environment Explanatory note The object of this Order is to substitute Schedule 13 to the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (the Act) (the Schedule that classifies certain plants as protected native plants). The consequences of a plant being classified as a protected native plant are: (a) section 115A of the Act provides for the preparation of plans of management for any commercial activity relating to a species or group of species of protected native plant if the Director-General of the Department of Environment and Climate Change is of the opinion that the activity has the potential to affect adversely the conservation of the species or group, and (b) section 116 of the Act prevents the issue of licences under the Forestry Act 1916 for the removal of protected native plants from any State forest, timber reserve or Crown land, and (c) section 117 of the Act restricts the picking or possession of protected native plants, and (d) section 118 of the Act restricts the selling of protected native plants. -
Priority Band Table
Priority band 1 Annual cost of securing all species in band: $338,515. Average cost per species: $4,231 Flora Scientific name Common name Species type Acacia atrox Myall Creek wattle Shrub Acacia constablei Narrabarba wattle Shrub Acacia dangarensis Acacia dangarensis Tree Allocasuarina defungens Dwarf heath casuarina Shrub Asperula asthenes Trailing woodruff Forb Asterolasia buxifolia Asterolasia buxifolia Shrub Astrotricha sp. Wallagaraugh (R.O. Makinson 1228) Tura star-hair Shrub Baeckea kandos Baeckea kandos Shrub Bertya opponens Coolabah bertya Shrub Bertya sp. (Chambigne NR, Bertya sp. (Chambigne NR, M. Fatemi M. Fatemi 24) 24) Shrub Boronia boliviensis Bolivia Hill boronia Shrub Caladenia tessellata Tessellated spider orchid Orchid Calochilus pulchellus Pretty beard orchid Orchid Carex klaphakei Klaphake's sedge Forb Corchorus cunninghamii Native jute Shrub Corynocarpus rupestris subsp. rupestris Glenugie karaka Shrub Cryptocarya foetida Stinking cryptocarya Tree Desmodium acanthocladum Thorny pea Shrub Diuris sp. (Oaklands, D.L. Jones 5380) Oaklands diuris Orchid Diuris sp. aff. chrysantha Byron Bay diuris Orchid Eidothea hardeniana Nightcap oak Tree Eucalyptus boliviana Bolivia stringybark Tree Eucalyptus camphora subsp. relicta Warra broad-leaved sally Tree Eucalyptus canobolensis Silver-leaf candlebark Tree Eucalyptus castrensis Singleton mallee Tree Eucalyptus fracta Broken back ironbark Tree Eucalyptus microcodon Border mallee Tree Eucalyptus oresbia Small-fruited mountain gum Tree Gaultheria viridicarpa subsp. merinoensis Mt Merino waxberry Shrub Genoplesium baueri Bauer's midge orchid Orchid Genoplesium superbum Superb midge orchid Orchid Gentiana wissmannii New England gentian Forb Gossia fragrantissima Sweet myrtle Shrub Grevillea obtusiflora Grevillea obtusiflora Shrub Grevillea renwickiana Nerriga grevillea Shrub Grevillea rhizomatosa Gibraltar grevillea Shrub Hakea pulvinifera Lake Keepit hakea Shrub Hibbertia glabrescens Hibbertia glabrescens Shrub Hibbertia sp. -
Council Meeting Held on 23/02/2017
Peter Parker Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd 250 Broken Head Road, Broken Head, NSW 2481 0266 853 148 ACN 076 885 704 0419984954 [email protected] _________________________________________________________________ 18 November 2016 General Manager Byron Shire Council PO Box 219 MULLUMBIMBY NSW 2481 Rezoning of land at Tallowood Ridge, Mullumbimby Byron Shire Council provided the Applicant with an update on the planning proposal for rezoning of land at Tallowood Ridge on 27 September 2016. In this update, Council referred to a submission from the Office of Environment and Heritage (“OEH”) and requested that the Applicant provide an updated ecological, flora and fauna assessment. Council requested that the revised assessment is to include: Assessment of the whole of the land which is the subject of the planning proposal, particularly the forested areas Consideration of the potential impacts of the proposed rezoning and future development of approximately 65 additional residential lots with associated earthworks and infrastructure (roads, water, sewer, electricity) on the proposed R2 zoned land Consideration of the provisions of the draft ‘Byron Coast Comprehensive Koala Plan of Management’ and 1 |Peter Parker consultancy advice Additional field survey and/or verification as required to ensure that the report adequately addresses threatened species, populations and ecological communities listed on the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 since 2011. The site is arguably one of the most intensively surveyed sites in Byron Shire. A systematic flora and fauna survey was undertaken in 2011 and regular koala Spot Assessment Technique (“SAT”) surveys have been periodically undertaken since 2011. Survey results are discussed below. 1.0 Background A systematic flora and fauna survey was undertaken in 2011 by this consultancy. -
NSW Threatened Species Scientific Committee: Minor Amendments February 2021
NSW Threatened Species Scientific Committee Final Determination Minor amendments to the lists of threatened species and ecological communities in the Schedules of the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 The Threatened Species Scientific Committee, established under the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 (the Act), has made a final determination to amend the list of species and ecological communities in Schedules 1, 2 and 3 of the Act referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b) below. Minor amendments to the Schedules are provided for by section 4.19 of Part 4 of the Act. a) The Threatened Species Scientific Committee is of the opinion that the following amendments are necessary or desirable to reflect a change in the name of a listed species or a reclassification of a listed species into further species as a result of taxonomic revision: The references cited contain the reasons for these amendments in the Schedules. Schedule 1 Threatened species Part 1 Critically endangered species Division 1 Animals Vertebrates Birds Charadriidae Omit * Thinornis rubricollis (Gmelin, 1789) Hooded Plover Insert * Thinornis cucullatus cucullatus (Vieillot, 1818) Eastern Hooded Dotterel, Eastern Hooded Plover Reference ABRS 2009. Australian Faunal Directory. Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra. M Lockett Australian Biological Resources Study in litt. 14/7/2020 Division 2 Plants Omit Prasophyllum sp. Majors Creek (Jones 11084) Insert Prasophyllum sandrae D.L.Jones Reference Jones D.L. (2019) Two new species of Prasophyllum R.Br. in the P. patens R.Br./P.odoratum R.S.Rogers complex from south-eastern NSW South Wales and Australian Capital Territory. Australian Orchid Review 84(2):37-39 Established under the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 Locked Bag 5022 Parramatta NSW 2124 (02) 9585 6940 [email protected] NSW Threatened Species Scientific Committee Schedule 1 Threatened species Part 2 Endangered species Division 3 Plants Fabaceae Omit *Acacia terminalis (Salisb.) J.F. -
Post-Fire Recovery of Woody Plants in the New England Tableland Bioregion
Post-fire recovery of woody plants in the New England Tableland Bioregion Peter J. ClarkeA, Kirsten J. E. Knox, Monica L. Campbell and Lachlan M. Copeland Botany, School of Environmental and Rural Sciences, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, AUSTRALIA. ACorresponding author; email: [email protected] Abstract: The resprouting response of plant species to fire is a key life history trait that has profound effects on post-fire population dynamics and community composition. This study documents the post-fire response (resprouting and maturation times) of woody species in six contrasting formations in the New England Tableland Bioregion of eastern Australia. Rainforest had the highest proportion of resprouting woody taxa and rocky outcrops had the lowest. Surprisingly, no significant difference in the median maturation length was found among habitats, but the communities varied in the range of maturation times. Within these communities, seedlings of species killed by fire, mature faster than seedlings of species that resprout. The slowest maturing species were those that have canopy held seed banks and were killed by fire, and these were used as indicator species to examine fire immaturity risk. Finally, we examine whether current fire management immaturity thresholds appear to be appropriate for these communities and find they need to be amended. Cunninghamia (2009) 11(2): 221–239 Introduction Maturation times of new recruits for those plants killed by fire is also a critical biological variable in the context of fire Fire is a pervasive ecological factor that influences the regimes because this time sets the lower limit for fire intervals evolution, distribution and abundance of woody plants that can cause local population decline or extirpation (Keith (Whelan 1995; Bond & van Wilgen 1996; Bradstock et al. -
Threatened Species Day Events Guidedownload
SAVING OUR SPECIES Threatened Species Day Your guide to running a successful community event © 2019 State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage With the exception of photographs, the State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. The Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) has compiled this report in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. OEH shall not be liable for any damage which may occur to any person or organisation taking action or not on the basis of this publication. Readers should seek appropriate advice when applying the information to their specific needs. All content in this publication is owned by OEH and is protected by Crown Copyright, unless credited otherwise. It is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), subject to the exemptions contained in the licence. The legal code for the licence is available at Creative Commons. OEH asserts the right to be attributed as author of the original material in the following manner: © State of New South Wales and Office of Environment and Heritage 2019. Cover photo: Wingello Grevillea (Grevillea molyneuxii) flower -
Index to NSW TSSC Final Determinations
NSW Threatened Species Scientific Committee Index to Final Determinations – 1996 –2018 (Updated to 27/4/2018) Listing of threatened species, populations and ecological communities in NSW from 1996 to 25th August 2017 was undertaken by the NSW Scientific Committee established under the Threatened Species Conservation Act, 1995. The extinction risk of species, populations and ecological communities were assessed at the State scale under this Act. However, it should be noted that assessments of species endemic to NSW (ie species that only occur in NSW) is equivalent to a national scale assessment. The NSW Threatened Species Scientific Committee (NSWTSSC) is established under the Biodiversity Conservation Act, 2016 which commenced on 25th August 2017. Under ths Act, species and ecological communities are assessed at the national scale. If a species or ecological community is not threatened at the national scale then it can be assessed at the State scale and can be listed as threatened if it meets the criteria for listing in NSW. The NSWTSSC identifies and assesses species and ecological communities for listing as threatened in the Schedules of the Act as follows: Schedule 1 – Critically endangered (CR), Endangered (E) and Vulnerable (V) species Schedule 2 – Critically endangered (CREEC), Endangered (EEC) and Vulnerable (VEC) ecological communities Schedule 3 – Extinct species (EX), species extinct in the wild and collapsed ecological communities Schedule 4 – Key threatening processes (KTP) Final determinations include the reasons for listing and are available for those entities listed or reviewed by the Committee since the Threatened Species Conservation Act, 1995 commenced in 1996. Final determinations made prior to 25th August 2017 refer to the listing criteria and provisons of the Threatended Species Conservation Act and Regulations. -
Germination and Ex Situ Storage of Hakea Dohertyi (Proteaceae) Seed
Offord et al., Germination and storage of Hakea dohertyi seed 129 Germination and ex situ storage of Hakea dohertyi (Proteaceae) seed Cathy Offord, Mishy Mckensy, Julie Brien*, Graeme Errington+ and Peter Cuneo Royal Botanic Gardens, Mount Annan Botanic Garden, Mount Annan Drive, Mount Annan NSW 2567, AUSTRALIA *Now at NSW Agriculture, Tumut; +Now at Eurobodalla Shire Council, NSW. Abstract: Fresh seeds of the endangered Hakea dohertyi Haegi (Proteaceae) germinated at 15°C (with 12 hour light) within 14 days. At higher temperatures (20°, 25°C) seeds were slower to germinate. After 28 days only 5% of seeds germinated at 30°C, but when moved to 15°C, close to 100% of seeds germinated within 14 days. Having established optimum germination conditions, the effects of ex situ storage conditions and duration were examined. Storage at low moisture content appeared to have little effect on the germinability of Hakea dohertyi seeds and this species can be considered orthodox in that respect. Seeds stored at 4.5 or 9% moisture content, 5 or -20°C and tested after 1 and 7 years of storage achieved close to 100% germination. Issues relating to the in situ and ex situ conservation of Hakea dohertyi are discussed. Cunninghamia (2003) 8(1): 129–132 Introduction There is a high degree of diversity and local endemism in the 5 tudy2ere Proteaceae of the Sydney region (Myerscough et al. 2000). Hakea dohertyi Haegi, discovered in 1986, is one of a number of endangered endemic species occurring in the region that 5yeron are threatened by land management changes (Fisher et al. -
Plant Diseases Regulations 1989
Western Australia Plant Diseases Regulations 1989 STATUS OF THIS DOCUMENT This document is from an electronic database of legislation maintained by the Parliamentary Counsel’s Office of Western Australia. DISCLAIMER No warranty is given as to the accuracy or completeness of this document. The State of Western Australia and its agents and employees disclaim liability, whether in negligence or otherwise, for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on the accuracy or completeness of this document. REPRINT AND CONSOLIDATION NUMBERING The reprint number (in the footer of each page of the document) shows how many times the Act has been reprinted. For example, numbering a reprint as “Reprint 3” would mean that the reprint was the 3rd reprint since the Act was passed. A consolidation described as “Consolidation 3a” would be the result of updating Reprint 3 for the first time to reflect the amendments since the date as at which Reprint 3 was prepared. Reprint and consolidation numbering was implemented as from 1 January 2003. COPYRIGHT Copyright in this document is reserved to the Crown in right of the State of Western Australia. Reproduction except in accordance with copyright law is prohibited. THE TEXT OF THE LEGISLATION FOLLOWS Western Australia Plant Diseases Regulations 1989 CONTENTS Part 1 — Preliminary 1. Citation 1 2. Commencement 1 3. Interpretation 1 Part 2 — Entry requirements 3A. Quality assurance system 3 3B. Bringing plants into the State 3 4. Potential carriers — conditions for entry 3 4A. Potential carriers — entry for experimental purposes 4 4B. Potential carriers — entry for processing or export 4 5. Entry of propagating material 5 6. -
I Is the Sunda-Sahul Floristic Exchange Ongoing?
Is the Sunda-Sahul floristic exchange ongoing? A study of distributions, functional traits, climate and landscape genomics to investigate the invasion in Australian rainforests By Jia-Yee Samantha Yap Bachelor of Biotechnology Hons. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2018 Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation i Abstract Australian rainforests are of mixed biogeographical histories, resulting from the collision between Sahul (Australia) and Sunda shelves that led to extensive immigration of rainforest lineages with Sunda ancestry to Australia. Although comprehensive fossil records and molecular phylogenies distinguish between the Sunda and Sahul floristic elements, species distributions, functional traits or landscape dynamics have not been used to distinguish between the two elements in the Australian rainforest flora. The overall aim of this study was to investigate both Sunda and Sahul components in the Australian rainforest flora by (1) exploring their continental-wide distributional patterns and observing how functional characteristics and environmental preferences determine these patterns, (2) investigating continental-wide genomic diversities and distances of multiple species and measuring local species accumulation rates across multiple sites to observe whether past biotic exchange left detectable and consistent patterns in the rainforest flora, (3) coupling genomic data and species distribution models of lineages of known Sunda and Sahul ancestry to examine landscape-level dynamics and habitat preferences to relate to the impact of historical processes. First, the continental distributions of rainforest woody representatives that could be ascribed to Sahul (795 species) and Sunda origins (604 species) and their dispersal and persistence characteristics and key functional characteristics (leaf size, fruit size, wood density and maximum height at maturity) of were compared. -
Bushfire Impacts How Much Seed Will I Need?
BUSHFIRE IMPACTS HOW MUCH SEED WILL I NEED? JUNE 2021 First published 2021 Project Phoenix Greening Australia (National Office) Level 3, 349 Collins Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Tel: 1300 886 589 Email: [email protected] Website: www.greeningaustralia.org.au ISBN: xxx-x-xxxxxx-xx-x (Book) xxx-x-xxxxxx-xx-x (epub) Authors: Dr Melinda Pickup, Technical Lead, Greening Australia With contributions by Summer Bailey Kerber, Research Assistant, Greening Australia Title: Bushfire impacts — How much seed will I need? Notes: Includes bibliographical references Copyright © Project Phoenix 2021 Cover by Kerry O’Flaherty, Design Consultant Internal design by Puddingburn Publishing Services Proofread by Puddingburn Publishing Services This report is copyright. Except for private study, research, criticism or reviews, as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of this report may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission. Enquiries should be made to [email protected]. Project Phoenix is supported by the Australian Government’s Wildlife and Habitat Bushfire Recovery program and co-ordinated by Greening Australia. Across all of our Project Phoenix activities and actions we pay respect to the Traditional Owners and Custodians of the lands and waters on which we work. We honour the resilience and continuing connection to country, culture and community of all Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people across Australia. We recognise the decisions we make today will impact the lives of generations to come. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Authorship: Dr Melinda Pickup, with contributions by Summer Bailey Kerber. Greening Australia would like to acknowledge the hard work and dedication of the Project Phoenix Management Team: Samantha Craigie, Patricia Verden, Brian Ramsay, Irene Walker, Courtney Sullivan, Rowan Wood, Paul Della Libera, Kim Philliponi and Ella Campen.