Ending Racial Profiling in America Hearing Committee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ending Racial Profiling in America Hearing Committee AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT__ INFORMATION S. HRG. 112-944 ENDING RACIAL PROFILING INAMERICA HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE CONSTITUTION, CIVIL RIGHTS AND HUMAN RIGHTS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION APRIL 17, 2012 Serial No. J-112-70 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary C 2 C 3D Pr S. HRG. 112-944 ENDING RACIAL PROFILING INAMERICA HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE CONSTITUTION, CIVIL RIGHTS AND HUMAN RIGHTS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION APRIL 17, 2012 Serial No. J-112-70 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 20-969 PDF WASHINGTON :2016 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402-0001 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont, Chairman HERB KOHL, Wisconsin CHUCK GRASSLEY, Iowa, Ranking Member DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah CHUCK SCHUMER, New York JON KYL, Arizona DICK DURBIN, Illinois JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island LINDSEY GRAHAM, South Carolina AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota JOHN CORNYN, Texas AL FRANKEN, Minnesota MICHAEL S. LEE, Utah CHRISTOPHER A. COONS, Delaware TOM COBURN, Oklahoma RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, Connecticut BRUCE A. COHEN, Chief Counsel and Staff Director KOLAN DAvIs, Republican Chief Counsel and Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE CONSTITUTION, CIVIL RIGHTS AND HUMAN RIGHTS DICK DURBIN, Illinois, Chairman PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont LINDSEY GRAHAM, South Carolina, SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island Ranking Member AL FRANKEN, Minnesota JON KYL, Arizona CHRISTOPHER A. COONS, Delaware JOHN CORNYN, Texas RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, Connecticut MICHAEL S. LEE, Utah TOM COBURN, Oklahoma JOSEPH ZOGBY, Democratic Chief Counsel WALT KUHN, Republican Chief Counsel CONTENTS APRIL 17, 2012, 10:00 A.M. STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBER Page Durbin, Hon. Dick, a U.S. Senator from the State of Illinois .................... 1 prepared statem ent .......................................................................................... 129 WITNESSES W itn ess L ist ............................................................................................................. 4 3 Cardin, Hon. Benjamin L., a U.S. Senator from the State of Maryland ........... 4 prepared statem ent .......................................................................................... 45 Chu, Hon. Judy, a Representative in Congress from the State of California ..... 9 prepared statem ent .......................................................................................... 49 Clegg, Roger, President and General Counsel, Center for Equal Opportunity, F alls C hurch , V irginia ........................................................................................ 20 prepared statem ent .......................................................................................... 51 Conyers, Jr., Hon. John, a Representative in Congress from the State of M ich ig a n ............................................................................................................... 5 Davis, Ronald L., Chief of Police, City of East Palo Alto, California ... .......... 12 prepared statem ent .......................................................................................... 59 Ellison, Hon. Keith, a Representative in Congress from the State of Min- n e so ta .................................................................................................................... 8 prepared statem ent .......................................................................................... 66 Gale, Frank, National Second Vice President, Grand Lodge, Fraternal Order of Police, Denver, Colorado ............................................17 prepared statem ent .......................................................................................... 67 Gutierrez, Hon. Luis V., a Representative in Congress from the State of Illin o is ................................................................................................................... 6 prepared statem ent .......................................................................................... 76 Harris, David A., Professor of Law and Associate Dean for Research, Univer- sity of Pittsburgh School of Law, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania .................. 21 prepared statem ent .......................................................................................... 8 1 Romero, Anthony, Executive Director, American Civil Liberties Union, New Y ork, N ew Y ork ................................................................................................... 15 prepared statem ent .......................................................................................... 100 Wilson, Hon. Frederica, a Representative in Congress from the State of F lord a ................................................................................................................... 10 prepared statem ent .......................................................................................... 127 MISCELLANEOUS SUBMISSIONS FOR THE RECORD African American Ministers in Action (AAMIA), A Project of People For the American Way, Minister Leslie Watson Malachi, Director, statement ..... 131 African American Ministers in Action et al., April 17, 2012, letter .. ........... 507 Alliance for a Just Society, LeeAnn Hall, Executive Director, statement .......... 141 American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC), Washington, DC, state ent .............................................................................................................. 166 American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Illinois, Harvey Grossman, Legal Director, statement ............................................ ..... 145 American Friends Service Committee (AFSC), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, state ent .............................................................................................................. 150 American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA), Washington, DC, state- m en t ...................................................................................................................... 16 2 Page Americans for Immigrant Justice, Cheryl Little, Executive Director, state- m e n t ...................................................................................................................... 16 8 Amnesty International USA, Suzanne Nossel, Executive Director, statement .. 172 Anti-Defamation League@ (ADL), Deborah M. Lauter, Director, Civil Rights, Michael Lieberman, Washington Counsel, and Stacy Burdett, Washington D irector, statem ent .............................................................................................. 183 Arab American Institute, The, Danielle Malaty, Manager, Government Rela- tions in Dom estic Policy, statem ent ................................................................... 187 Asian American Center for Advancing Justice, April 17, 2012, statement ........ 192 Bill of Rights Defense Committee (BORDC), Shahid Buttar, Executive Direc- tor, statem en t ....................................................................................................... 19 5 Black Alliance for Just Immigration (BAJI), Gerald Lenoir, Executive Direc- tor, statem en t ....................................................................................................... 198 Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law, Faiza Patel and Elizabeth Goitein, Co-Directors, Liberty and National Security P rogram, statem ent ............................................................................................. 20 1 "Call the NYPD," photo campaign on social media, statement ................ 213 Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), Vincent Warren, Executive Director, state ent .............................................................................................................. 2 16 Center for Latino Progress-CPRF, Yanil Teron, Executive Director, state- m e n t ...................................................................................................................... 2 2 5 Citizens United for Rehabilitation of Errants (CURE)-Virginia, Carla Peter- son, Executive Director, statement .....................................607 City of Riverside Police Department, Riverside, California, Sergio G. Diaz, Chief of Police, statement ..................... .................... 228 City of Seattle Immigrant and Refugee Commission, Seattle, Washington, Jesus Y. Rodriguez and Devon Abdallah, Co-Chairs, statement ... .......... 231 Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles (CHIRLA), Los Ange- les, California, Angelica Salas, Executive Director, statement ............... 235 Comunidad Liberacion/Liberation Community, Rev. Anne Dunlap, Pastor, state ent .............................................................................................................. 239 Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), Robert S. McCaw, statement .. 253 Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-Chicago), Chicago, Illinois, state ent .............................................................................................................. 24 2 Defending Dissent Foundation (DDF), Woody Kaplan, President, statement ... 257 Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Incorporated,
Recommended publications
  • Catalyst Circle Bringing Racial Equity Into Focus for St
    Catalyst Circle Bringing racial equity into focus for St. Louis A reality in which a person is no more or Racial less likely to experience society’s benefits or bur- Equity: dens just because of the color of their skin. We operate in our world and live our lives unaware of many things happening around us – until there is a catalytic event. For St. Louis, for many people in St. Louis, the catalytic event to put racial equity at the forefront was the shooting of Michael Brown. Throughout its history, St. Louis has long wrestled with race relations. Today, through the diligent work of the Ferguson Commission, we can better understand our role in making our community more equitable. The goal of this work, undertaken by individuals, small groups, and organizations throughout St. Louis, is to raise the level of understanding and identify a path toward racial equity. Racial equity can come through system-wide policy changes. It can also come through YOU. By having potentially difficult conversations about race with your friends and family, we can all play a part in stemming the tide of racism. No longer being comfortable remaining a bystander to our community’s racial inequities, this work will equip you to engage in those conversations, to share insights from a mismatched history, to radically listen to those who are different from you, and to become an individual catalyst for change in our community. Why does this matter to you? To our community? Racial equity provides each of us with individual enrichment and exposes us to diversity of thought, making us each more knowledgeable and effective members of our community.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pulitzer Prizes 2020 Winne
    WINNERS AND FINALISTS 1917 TO PRESENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Excerpts from the Plan of Award ..............................................................2 PULITZER PRIZES IN JOURNALISM Public Service ...........................................................................................6 Reporting ...............................................................................................24 Local Reporting .....................................................................................27 Local Reporting, Edition Time ..............................................................32 Local General or Spot News Reporting ..................................................33 General News Reporting ........................................................................36 Spot News Reporting ............................................................................38 Breaking News Reporting .....................................................................39 Local Reporting, No Edition Time .......................................................45 Local Investigative or Specialized Reporting .........................................47 Investigative Reporting ..........................................................................50 Explanatory Journalism .........................................................................61 Explanatory Reporting ...........................................................................64 Specialized Reporting .............................................................................70
    [Show full text]
  • The Freedom of Speech Vs the Right to Discriminate; American and French Policy on Banning Muslim Religious Attire”
    “The Freedom of Speech Vs the Right to Discriminate; American and French Policy on banning Muslim Religious Attire” Cortni Holthaus A New Middle East Spring 2016 3/31/2016 From hijab bans to TSA patdowns, the American and French government have shown no tolerance whatsoever to the people in the Muslim community in the aftermath of terror events such as 9/11 and the 2015 Paris Attack. In my essay, I explain why the American and French government have responded to these events the way they did, how it negatively affects Muslim people, and how the problem should be solved instead. The first and fourteenth amendments of the U.S Constitution, according to the American Civil Liberties Union, gives religious Muslim women the right to wear hijab, because there can be no state or federal law which prohibits this activity. However, there is a major caveat in this amendment; Sometimes, in a building like a school or an airport, hijab is not allowed, along with headscarves. This is because these public buildings often have a rule of no head coverings, and wearing hijab can be perceived as a safety issue, as the garment is loose, and items could potentially be stored under it. In the US' laws and French laws surrounding the right to religious attire, the laws are often contradicting, and can be interpreted many different ways by the governments and other national institutions. My goal is to explain why the U.S and French are inherently Islamophobic towards Muslim clothing, and explain what can be done in order to ameliorate this problem, taking in mind the recent terror attacks in Paris, and of past events such as 9/11.
    [Show full text]
  • Final CERD Follow up Report
    THE PERSISTENCE OF RACIAL AND ETHNIC PROFILING IN THE UNITED STATES A FOLLOW-UP REPORT TO THE U.N. COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION BY THE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION AND THE RIGHTS WORKING GROUP JUNE 30, 2009 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Chandra Bhatnagar, staff attorney with the ACLU Human Rights Program, is the principal author of this report. Jamil Dakwar, director of the Human Rights Program, reviewed and edited drafts of the report. Nicole Kief of the ACLU Racial Justice Program also provided significant material and valuable editing assistance. Mónica Ramírez of the ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project provided substantial material and reviewed sections of the report. Reggie Shuford of the Racial Justice Program; Lenora Lapidus of the ACLU Women’s Rights Project; and Michael Macleod-Ball, Jennifer Bellamy, and Joanne Lin of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office also reviewed drafts and contributed to the report, as did Ken Choe of the ACLU LGBT Project. Rachel Bloom and Nusrat Jahan Choudhary of the Racial Justice Program; Mike German and John Hardenbergh of the Washington Legislative Office; and Dan Mach of the ACLU Program on Religion and Belief all made contributions as well. Two law students, Elizabeth Joynes (Fordham Law School) and Peter Beauchamp (New York Law School), provided substantial editorial support and research assistance; Aron Cobbs from the Human Rights Program also contributed. Many ACLU affiliates made available extremely valuable material about and analyses of their state-based work, including Arizona, Arkansas, Northern California, Southern California, Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Eastern Missouri, New Mexico, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, and West Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • A Response to #Livingwhileblack: Blackness As Nuisance
    RESPONSE RACE, SPACE, AND SURVEILLANCE: A RESPONSE TO #LIVINGWHILEBLACK: BLACKNESS AS NUISANCE LOLITA BUCKNER INNISS* TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................ 213 I. Nuisance, Trespass, and the Interaction Between the Two ............................................................................ 219 II. #LWB Incidents as Legal Geography: Race and Space ................................................................................ 225 III. #LivingWhileBlack and Surveillance .............................. 229 Conclusion................................................................................... 231 INTRODUCTION In #LivingWhileBlack: Blackness as Nuisance, Taja-Nia Henderson and Jamila Jefferson-Jones examine incidents wherein white people called 911 to report Black people for occupying spaces that callers believed the Black people in question ought not to occupy.1 Sadly, these incidents * Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, Professor of Law, University Distinguished Professor and Inaugural Robert G. Storey Distinguished Faculty Fellow, SMU Dedman School of Law. Ph.D., LLM with Distinction, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University. J.D., University of California, Los Angeles. A.B., Princeton University. 1. Taja-Nia Y. Henderson & Jamila Jefferson-Jones, #LivingWhileBlack: Blackness as Nuisance, 69 AM. U. L. REV. 863, 863 (2020). The phenomenon of white people calling the police or personally accosting Black people based on unfounded allegations of wrongdoing
    [Show full text]
  • Under the Radar: Muslims Deported, Detained, and Denied on Unsubstantiated Terrorism Allegations (New York: NYU School of Law, 2011)
    CHRGJ and AALDEF ABOUT THE AUTHORS The Center for Human Rights and Global Justice (CHRGJ) at New York University School of Law was established in 2002 to bring together the law school’s teaching, research, clinical, internship, and publishing activities around issues of international human rights law. Through its litigation, advocacy, and research work, CHRGJ plays a critical role in identifying, denouncing, and fighting human rights abuses in several key areas of focus, including: Business and Human Rights; Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Caste Discrimination; Human Rights and Counter-Terrorism; Extrajudicial Executions; and Transitional Justice. Philip Alston and Ryan Goodman are the Center’s Faculty Chairs; Smita Narula and Margaret Satterthwaite are Faculty Directors; Jayne Huckerby is Research Director; and Veerle Opgenhaffen is Senior Program Director. The International Human Rights Clinic (IHRC) at New York University School of Law provides high quality, professional human rights lawyering services to community-based organizations, nongovernmental human rights organizations, and intergovernmental human rights experts and bodies. The Clinic partners with groups based in the United States and abroad. Working as researchers, legal advisers, and advocacy partners, Clinic students work side-by-side with human rights advocates from around the world. The Clinic is directed by Professor Smita Narula of the NYU faculty; Amna Akbar is Senior Research Scholar and Advocacy Fellow; and Susan Hodges is Clinic Administrator. The Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund (AALDEF), founded in 1974, is a national organization that protects and promotes the civil rights of Asian Americans. By combining litigation, advocacy, education, and organizing, AALDEF works with Asian American communities across the country to secure human rights for all.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives from the Dhs Frontline: Evaluating Staffing Resources and Requirements
    S. Hrg. 115–159 PERSPECTIVES FROM THE DHS FRONTLINE: EVALUATING STAFFING RESOURCES AND REQUIREMENTS HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 22, 2017 Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov/ Printed for the use of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 27–014 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin, Chairman JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri ROB PORTMAN, Ohio THOMAS R. CARPER, Delaware RAND PAUL, Kentucky JON TESTER, Montana JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma HEIDI HEITKAMP, North Dakota MICHAEL B. ENZI, Wyoming GARY C. PETERS, Michigan JOHN HOEVEN, North Dakota MAGGIE HASSAN, New Hampshire STEVE DAINES, Montana KAMALA D. HARRIS, California CHRISTOPHER R. HIXON, Staff Director GABRIELLE D’ADAMO SINGER, Chief Counsel BROOKE N. ERICSON, Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy JOSE´ J. BAUTISTA, Senior Professional Staff Member MARGARET E. DAUM, Minority Staff Director CAITLIN A. WARNER, Minority Counsel J. JACKSON EATON IV, Minority Senior Counsel HANNAH M. BERNER, Minority Investigator LAURA W. KILBRIDE, Chief Clerk BONNI E. DINERSTEIN, Hearing Clerk (II) C O N T E N T S Opening statements:
    [Show full text]
  • Billing Code: 9111-97-P DEPARTMENT OF
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 08/20/2021 and available online at Billing Code: 9111-97-P federalregister.gov/d/2021-17779, and on govinfo.gov DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 8 CFR Parts 208 and 235 [CIS No. 2692-21; DHS Docket No. USCIS-2021-0012] RIN 1615-AC67 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Executive Office for Immigration Review 8 CFR Parts 1003, 1208, and 1235 [A.G. Order No. 5116-2021] RIN 1125-AB20 Procedures for Credible Fear Screening and Consideration of Asylum, Withholding of Removal, and CAT Protection Claims by Asylum Officers AGENCY: Executive Office for Immigration Review, Department of Justice; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. SUMMARY: The Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) (collectively, “the Departments”) are proposing to amend the regulations governing the determination of certain protection claims raised by individuals subject to expedited removal and found to have a credible fear of persecution or torture. Under the proposed rule, such individuals could have their claims for asylum, withholding of removal under section 241(b)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA” or “the Act”) (“statutory withholding of removal”), or protection under the regulations issued pursuant to the legislation implementing U.S. obligations under Article 3 of the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (“CAT”) initially adjudicated by an asylum officer within U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”). Such individuals who are granted relief by the asylum officer would be entitled to asylum, withholding of removal, or protection under CAT, as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Candidate Number 25460
    LOSING CONTROL: REGULATING SITUATIONAL CRIME PREVENTION IN MASS PRIVATE PROPERTY * ROBERT E. PFEFFER ** Introduction Three young men enter a shopping mall. In a security office in the mall a guard monitors them via closed circuit TV. Based on their appearance, such as their ethnicity or the way they are dressed, he decides to approach them and asks for ID. They are told that if they do not produce ID, they will not be admitted. He then runs their names through the computer and finds that one of them was arrested two years before on a shoplifting charge. He tells all three they must leave. This not uncommon scenario raises nettlesome issues regarding the general right of the mall owner to exclude persons from the mall property versus the right of the young men to visit the mall, as well as whether the exclusion was based on factors — such as race, age, or ethnicity — that many would find at minimum troubling and perhaps entirely unacceptable. 1 The owner of the * This Article grew in part out of two presentations made to the faculty of the University of Mississippi. I wish to thank the faculty for the opportunity to present my ideas and for providing helpful feedback. It also was motivated by research performed under the guidance of the Faculty of Law and the Center for Criminological Research at Oxford University, and I wish to extend thanks to those institutions for their guidance and assistance. ** Of counsel, Bickel & Brewer, Dallas, Texas; Visiting Assistant Professor of Law, University of North Dakota School of Law, 2006-2007; Visiting Assistant Professor of Law, University of Mississippi School of Law, 2005-2006.
    [Show full text]
  • A Moral Call for a National Moratorium on Water, Power and Broadband Shutoffs
    To: The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Mitch McConnell Speaker Majority Leader U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Senate Washington, D.C. 20515 Washington, D.C. 20510 The Honorable Kevin McCarthy The Honorable Chuck Schumer Minority Leader Democratic Leader U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Senate Washington, D.C. 20515 Washington, D.C. 20510 cc: U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Committee U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation Date: July 30, 2020 A Moral Call for a National Moratorium on Water, Power and Broadband Shutoffs Dear Senate Majority Leader McConnell, Minority Leader Schumer, Speaker Pelosi, Minority Leader McCarthy, Chairman Barrasso, and Ranking Member Carper, Chairwoman Murkowski, Ranking Member Manchin, Chairman Wicker, and Ranking Member Cantwell: On behalf of our congregants, members and supporters nationwide, we, the undersigned 537 faith leaders and organizations urge Congress to take decisive, moral action and implement a nationwide moratorium on the shut-offs of electricity, water, broadband, and all other essential utility services for all households, places of worship, and other non-profit community centers as part of the next COVID-19 rescue package. As faith leaders in the Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Buddhist, Baha’i, and other religious traditions, we call on you to come to the aid of struggling families and houses of worship across the country--and ensure that we all have access to water, power, and broadband during the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. Nearly 80% of the American population self identifies as being grounded in a faith ideology.
    [Show full text]
  • Theire Journal
    CONTENTSFEATURES THE IRE JOURNAL 22- 34 TROUBLE IN SCHOOLS FALSE DATA TABLE OF CONTENTS School crime reports discredited; NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2005 official admits ‘we got caught’ By Liz Chandler 4 Hurricanes revive The Charlotte Observer investigative reporting; need for digging deeper NUMBERS GAME By Brant Houston, IRE Reporting of violence varies in schools; accountability found to be a problem 6 OVERCHARGE By Jeff Roberts CAR training pays off in examination and David Olinger of state purchase-card program’s flaws The Denver Post By Steve Lackmeyer The (Oklahoma City) Oklahoman REGISTRY FLAWS Police confusion leads 8 PAY TO PLAY to schools unaware of Money managers for public fund contribute juvenile sex offenders to political campaign coffers to gain favors attending class By Mark Naymik and Joseph Wagner By Ofelia Casillas The (Cleveland) Plain Dealer Chicago Tribune 10 NO CONSENT LEARNING CURVE Families unaware county profiting from selling Special needs kids dead relatives’ brains for private research use overrepresented in city’s By Chris Halsne failing and most violent KIRO-Seattle public high schools By John Keefe 12 MILITARY BOON WNYC-New York Public Radio Federal contract data shows economic boost to locals from private defense contractors LOOKING AHEAD By L.A. Lorek Plenty of questions remain San Antonio Express-News for journalists investigating problems at local schools By Kenneth S. Trump National School Safety and Security Services 14- 20 SPECIAL REPORT: DOING INVESTIGATIONS AFTER A HURRICANE COASTAL AREAS DELUGE OF DOLLARS
    [Show full text]
  • The Palestinian Struggle at a Watershed
    The Palestinian Struggle at a Watershed Al-Shabaka in 2018 and into 2019 This report is dedicated to Kamal Boullata Artist, Art Historian, and Steadfast Supporter of Justice 1942-2019 Contents From the Board President 3 Policy Analysis 7 Policy Reach 9 In Palestine 9 In Europe 10 In the United States 12 Member Network 14 Outreach 16 Our Valued Supporters 18 More Information 20 The Palestinian Struggle at a Watershed Al-Shabaka in 2018 and into 2019 From the Board President Resisting Despair, Sustaining the Struggle for Rights and Freedom As difficult as the previous decades have been for the Palestinian national movement, which has been on a downward spiral since its heyday in the 1970s, 2018 marked a grim turning point that has carried through 2019. At stake is the very survival of the national movement as a coherent expression of the will of the Palestinian people to achieve the right to self-determination and secure justice, freedom, and equality in historic Palestine and for Palestinian refugees. The tight alliance between the Israeli regime and the Trump Administration, with the latter’s greenlighting of annexation and conquest, has tightened the noose on Jerusalem, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip. This alliance has also led to a frontal assault against the Palestinians’ representative bodies which, hollowed out as they are, still provide a focal point in the absence of alternatives. It has also increased the criminalization of Palestinian solidarity activities. And yet, the Palestinian people refuse to concede defeat and, indeed, are launching major acts of largely peaceful resistance to the efforts to terminate their struggle for rights.
    [Show full text]