897 42T6t25, 9 4362200 1 5 Anjaw District, the Commission Could Not
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
,; c ffi r{-q-* tnt 3Tfuo.n dffi RIGHT TO {rai? q'rd H INFORMATION ARUNACHAL PRADESH INFORMATION COMMISSION ITANAGAR E COURT OF DR.JORAM BEGt, STATE CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER No.APlC-76/ZOZO Dated, ltanagar the 11th August, 2OZO Under Section 19(3) RTt Act, 2005 Appellant Respondent Shri Shoney Pertin, Shri S.S. Singh & PIO-cum-EE(PWD), Shri Kanggong Pertin, O/o EE, PWD Khupa, President Siang Rights Vs Hayuliang Division, Forum(SRF), Anjaw District, Airfield Pasighat, Ward No-4, Arunachal Pradesh. PolPs-Pasighat (M) e4365614ss East Siang District. (m) 09a02788327, 897 42t6t25, 9 4362200 1 5 Dated of hearing: llth August' 2020. ORDER Whereas, an appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act, 2005 has been received from Shri Shoney Pertin, & Shri Kanggong Pertin, President Siang Rights Forum(SRF), Airfield pasighat, Ward No-4, Po/Ps-Pasighat, East Siang District, for non-furnishing of information, by Shri S.S. Singh, plO-cum- EE(PWD), O/o EE, PWD Khupa, Hayuliang Division, Anjaw District , Arunachal pradesh as sought, by the Appellants under section 6(1) of RTI Act, 2005 on 23/01,/ZO2O. Whereas, the L't hearing was held through online Video / Audio conferencing on 9th June, 2020' Shri S.S. Singh, PIO-cum-EE(PWD), EE, O/o PWD Khupa, Hayuliang Division, Anjaw District , Arunachal Pradesh could not be accessed due to network problems. The Appellant Shri Shoney pertin attended the hearing through audio conferencing. The Appellant informed the Commission that the PIO has given him in written that the information sought by the Appellant regarding the "Construction of vorious Roads ond Bridges under Hayliang Division (SH: protection Work ond Povement of Rs. 565.748 lakhs) since 2014-75'does not exist, as such scheme or work has not been implemented in the area. The Appellant also informed that the PIO has given the statement that signatures found in some documents are not his signature. The same statement will be given in written by the Plo and a copy will be forwarded to the commission. Whereas, the Commission, found that the Appellant has submitted two lpplication and both were registered in different Appeal Nos, i.e. APIC-76/2020 and AplC-80/2020. Therefore, both the appeal are clubbed together into one as A?!C-76/ZO2O. The plo. Commission could not hear from the Therefore, to hear from the plO, the commission decided to fix next date of hearing. Contd..p..2 -2- conferencing on 7tn luly' Whereas, the 2ndhearing was held through online Video / Audio Hayuliang Division, Anjaw District 2020.Shri S.S. Singh, rto-cum-if(eWD), O/o EE, PWD Khupa, ' the hearing through online video Arunachal Pradesh and the Appellant Shri Shoney Pertin attended is no such scheme "construction of conferencing. The Plo informed the commission that there Work ond Povement) (Rs' 665'748 vorious Roods ond Bridges under Hayliang Division (SH: Protection the Appellant vide Letter No' HD/AC- lokhs, during 2014-15)". The Plo has also given in written to However, there is o similar work i'e' "Repoir lg l2O2O-Ztl8t-84 Dated O2/OSI202O stating the same. (SH: Protection & works & Pavement)' and mointenance of Roods & Bridges under Hayulliong Division certificate No H DP/Cont/20l4-15/2I2 The Plo also informed that the signature in the completion match with the signature of Shri Dated 20/0512015 furnished by the Appellant does not seems to Engineer(PWD) Hayulliang Division R.N.Singh, Executive Engineer(PWD), who was the Executive during that time. R'N. Sigh, EE(PWD), now Whereas, the Commission directed the PIO to confirm from Shri work completion certificate posted at Yingkiong, Upper siang District regardinS the signature in the and get his written statement' No. HDp/Cont/2014-75/212 Dated 2010512015 within 77th July'2120 to the Commission before The PIO is also directecl to send a copy of the statement of Shri R.N. Singh, next date of hearing. on 11th whereas, the 3'ohearing was held through online video / Audio conferencing August, 2020.shri s.s. singh, Plo-cum-EE(PWD), O/o EE, PWD Khupa, Hayuliang Division, An[w District, Arunachal pradesh and the Appellant Shri Shoney Pertin attended the hearing through online audio conferencing. The PIO verbally and also in written vide letter no' HD/AC- tg/Rit/2020-21./671-72 Dated 05/08/2020 informed the commission that Shri R.N' Singh, the EE(PWD), Yingkiong, upper siang District have confirmed that signature found in Completion certificate No. HDP/Cont /20t4-15/212 Dared 20/05/2015 submitted by the M/s J.B. Constructions is not his signature. whereas, the commission viewed that shri s.5. singh, Plo-cum-EE(PWD), O/o EE, PWD Khupa, Hayuliang Division, Anjaw District , Arunachal Pradesh has been consistently stating that signature found in the Completion certificate No. HDP/ConL/20I4-!5/2I2 Dated 20/05/2015 submitted by the M/s J.B. Constructions is not the signature of Shri R'N' Singh, the then EE(pWD) Hayuliang. Also, Shri R.N. Singh, EE(PWD) himself has also confirmed that the signature is not his and the PIO has given in written to the effect. The Appellant is also satisfied with the information furnished to him by the PlO. Therefore, the case is hereby disposed of' sd/_ (Dr.Joram Begi) State Chief Information Commissioner Arunachal Pradesh Information Commission Ita naga r Memo No.APtc-7612o2o / tAS_ Dated, ltanagar the l&August,2020 Copy to: 1. Shri S.S. Singh, PIO-cum-EE(PWD), O/o EE, PWD Khupa, Hayuliang Division, Anjaw District, Arunachal Pradesh, 2. Shri Shoney Pertin, & Shri Kanggong Pertin, President Siang Rights Forum(SRF), Airfield Pasighat, Ward No-4, Po/Ps-Pasighat, East Siang District, , 3--Computer Programmer, APIC, ltanagar, to upload in APIC Website, -4. Case f ile. Commission Ita naga r.