DOCSLIB.ORG

Challenging Secularities, Challenging Religion: 'Secularist Ex

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Challenging Secularities, Challenging Religion: 'Secularist Ex Journal of journal of religion in europe 11 (2018) 348-377 Religion in Europe brill.com/jre Challenging Secularities, Challenging Religion: ‘Secularist Ex-Muslim Voices’ in the British Debate on Islam and Freedom of Expression Maria Vliek Faculty of Philosophy, Theology & Religious Studies, Radboud University Nijmegen [email protected] Abstract This article uses the interpretative device of ‘multiple secularities’ to interrogate the presence of ‘secularist ex-Muslim voices’ in the British debate on Islam and freedom of expression. By contrasting Britain with the Netherlands, where these voices are currently relatively absent, it will examine ‘secularist ex-Muslim voices’ as expressed at the International Conference on Freedom of Conscience and Ex- pression in London, July 2017. It argues that these voices have surfaced here due to Britain’s particular history of secularity for the sake of accommodating diversity. They challenge institutionalized levels (state-church relations, multiculturalism, and communitarianism) and social and cultural forms (debate on freedom of ex- pression and Islamophobia). These voices are relatively absent in the Netherlands due to its dominant secularity for the sake of social/national integration. Due to the particular histories of secularity, reference problems that surface in Britain have less bearing on the Dutch situation. These voices have, therefore, been relatively absent. Keywords secularity – religion – ex-Muslim – Britain – Islam – freedom of expression – multiple secularities © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2018 | doi 10.1163/18748929-01104004Downloaded from Brill.com09/25/2021 11:21:54AM via free access <UN> Challenging Secularities, Challenging Religion 349 1 Introduction We make no apologies. We will not live on our knees. We are the tsunami that is coming.1 These were the final words with which Maryam Namazie opened the Inter- national Conference on Freedom of Conscience and Expression in London, on 22 July 2017. Her words referred to the growing number of ex-Muslims and atheists from Islamic communities who speak out against Islam. The confer- ence marked the tenth anniversary of the Council of Ex-Muslims in Britain (cemb) and aimed to bring together secularists and freethinkers from all over the world.2 At the conference, panels consisted of people such as Deeyah Khan, film maker of the documentary Islam’s Non-believers (2016), scientist and atheist Richard Dawkins, spokesperson for the campaign One Law for All Gina Khan, co-founder of Ex-Muslims of North America Sarah Haider, lgbt ex-Muslim activist Jimmy Bangash, author and broadcaster Kenan Malik, di- rector of the Centre for Secular Space Gita Sahgal, and many more. Issues such as Islamophobia, apostasy and blasphemy, communalism and multicultural- ism, secularism, and identity politics were discussed. Although many opinions were shared, the general atmosphere and rhetoric is best described by Namaz- ie’s own agenda. Namazie is, among other things, the founder and chair of the Council of Ex- Muslims in Britain. She has criticized Islam and, in particular, what she refers to as ‘Islamism’—political appropriation of Islam. She has frequently referred to apostates and blasphemers in Muslim majority countries who are being persecuted for asserting their right to freedom of conscience. Consequently, she has castigated British left-wing parties and public figures for siding with Islamists by only recognizing values of liberty when it concerns themselves but not when it concerns Muslims.3 This so-called regressive left, according to Namazie, has imposed de facto blasphemy laws in the West by the accusation 1 Nano GoleSorkh, “Maryam Namazie: Celebrating Apostasy and Blasphemy,” 26 July 2017. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3Hb38s9jAQ (accessed 13 June 2018). 2 In light of my PhD project focusing on people leaving Islam in Europe, I attended this event. My research project aims to shed light on the experiences of moving out of Islam in Europe, as well as complications of ‘speaking out’ and ‘being out.’ Fieldwork has been conducted over eighteen months, during which forty-four people have been interviewed, twenty-two in the Netherlands, and twenty-two in the uk, on their experiences of leaving faith behind. 3 Maryam Namazie, “Walking a Tightrope: Between the Pro-Islamist Left and the Far Right,” 7 May 2014. http://onelawforall.org.uk/walking-a-tightrope-between-the-pro-islamist-left- and-the-far-right/ (accessed 3 May 2018). journal of religion in europe 11 (2018) 348-377 Downloaded from Brill.com09/25/2021 11:21:54AM via free access <UN> 350 Vliek of Islamophobia when it concerns public criticism of Islamic doctrine. These controversial opinions have led to accusations from Muslims and non- Muslims alike of racism and siding with right-wing populists, which Namazie has refuted.4 During the conference, panelists and speakers stressed time and again the ‘incommensurable divide’ between Islam and secularism.5 They asserted their authority to do so by claiming to be ‘a voice from within’—a voice that as- sumes that since one has been ‘inside’ Islam has thereby the knowledge (often through victimhood) to now speak out against it.6 My larger research project focuses on people who could potentially take up such roles: they have Islamic backgrounds, they are from the Netherlands or Britain, and they no longer be- lieve in God nor have they converted to another religion. I attended the Con- ference mentioned above in the middle of my fieldwork, and I jotted down various occasions that ‘multiculturalism,’ state appropriation, and legal incor- poration of religious sensibilities seemed to be what participants of the Con- ference argued against. I also noted, that these were themes that at the time were not particularly present in the Dutch debate nor were ‘voices from within’ currently contesting such issues. A prominent ‘voice from within’—or what I will now refer to as ‘secular- ist ex-Muslim voices’—did, at one point, surface in the Netherlands, that is Ayaan Hirsi Ali who entered politics in 2002. The Somali-born was the first Dutch politician to confront issues of Islam in the West by stressing her inti- mate knowledge of the ‘darkness’ of her former religion. Islam was, according to her, threatening the ‘Enlightenment values’ of the Netherlands. Although she left the country in 2006, Dutch right-wing politics have since been domi- nated by like-minded politician Geert Wilders who pursues a nationalist, anti- Islam, anti-Europe agenda.7 In this light, my research interlocutors from the Netherlands who I interviewed with regards to their loss of faith often thought that what Namazie calls “the celebration of apostasy and blasphemy” was 4 Idem, “One Law for All Has No Links with Anne Marie Waters and Sharia Watch,” 7 May 2014. http://onelawforall.org.uk/anne-marie-waters-is-leaving-post-of-spokesperson/ (accessed 3 May 2018). 5 Saba Mahmood, “Religious Reason and Secular Affect: An Incommensurable Divide?,” Criti- cal Inquiry 35/4 (2009), 836–862. 6 Idem, “Feminism, Democracy, and Empire: Islam and the War on Terror,” in: Hanna Herzog & Ann Braude (eds.), Gendering Religion and Politics: Untangling Modernities (New York: Palgrave McMillan, 2009) 193–215. 7 See also Elizabeth Poole, “The Case of Geert Wilders: Multiculturalism, Islam, and Identity in the uk,” Journal of Religion in Europe 5/2 (2012), 162–191. journal of religion inDownloaded europe from 11 Brill.com09/25/2021 (2018) 348-377 11:21:54AM via free access <UN> Challenging Secularities, Challenging Religion 351 more harmful rather than helpful toward the plight of those that wish to leave Islam.8 Besides not necessarily feeling much resentment towards Islam or Muslims, many of my interlocutors in the Netherlands feared that if they were to speak out then their narratives could be utilized by Geert Wilders or other populist politicians, aiming to exclude Muslims. So why do these particular activist and political voices currently emerge and assemble in Britain, but not in the Netherlands? I argue that ‘secularist ex-Muslim voices’ have recently emerged in the public debate in Britain and not as much in the Netherlands because of these countries’ respective histories of secularity. The way the state treats its reli- gious minorities as well as the social and cultural meanings that define and contest religious and secular spaces have raised particular problems that ‘secu- larist ex-Muslim voices’ currently contest in Britain. I contend that because of the particular developments of secularities in the Netherlands and the refer- ence problems these produce, this voice has not surfaced there in recent years. Because Britain has been predominantly marked by a secularity that seeks to accommodate religious diversity, ‘secularist ex-Muslim voices’ criticize both policy as well as the cultural norms it produces, which allegedly accommodate Islamism. In order to shed light on why ‘secularist ex-Muslim voices’ currently surface in Britain but are relatively absent in the Netherlands, this article will first elab- orate on the theoretical concept of ‘multiple secularities.’9 Second, an analysis will be provided on the particulars of dominant British secularity and its con- testations on institutionalized levels and the policies it has produced. Third, in order to explore the social and cultural domains of secularity in Britain, the reception of the Danish cartoon affair in 2006 and the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo attacks in 2015 by the British press and commentators will be elabo- rated on. Last, in order to unpack the ‘secularist ex-Muslim discourse’ and its particular surfacing in Britain, a case study concerning the above-mentioned conference will be presented. Throughout this article, the Dutch situation will be utilized as a contrast against which the British situation becomes particu- larly salient. 8 GoleSorkh, “Maryam.” On injury and blasphemy, see also Christoph Baumgartner, “Blasphe- my as Violence: Trying to Understand the Kind of Injury that Can Be Inflicted by Acts and Artefacts that Are Construed as Blasphemy,” Journal of Religion in Europe 6/1 (2013), 35–63.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Political and Legal Status of Apostates in Islam
    Political and Legal Status of Apostates in Islam The Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain was formed in June 2007 in order to break the taboo that comes with renouncing Islam. The main aims of the organisation are to provide support to and highlight the plight of ex- Muslims, challenge Sharia and apostasy laws and take a stand for reason, universal rights and secularism. Atheist Alliance International is a global alliance of atheist and freethought groups and individuals, committed to educating its members and the public about atheism, secularism and related issues. Atheist Alliance International is proud to support its Affiliate, the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain, in the publication of this report. For further information contact: CEMB BM Box 1919 London WC1N 3XX, UK Tel: +44 (0) 7719166731 [email protected] www.ex-muslim.org.uk Atheist Alliance International [email protected] www.atheistalliance.org Published by Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain, December 2013 © Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain 2013 – All rights reserved ISBN: 978-0-9926038-0-9 Political and Legal Status of Apostates in Islam A Publication of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain Political and Legal Status of Apostates in Islam Died Standing A severed head in between your hands my eyes on the broken clock And sad and rebellious poems and the wolf, unafraid of the gun On my doubts of the origin of existence, on choking loneliness when drunk And longing and inhaling you, and the depth of the tragedy not seeing you The artery destined to blockage, and your
    [Show full text]
  • Faith in the Academy: Religion at University
    Faith in the Academy: Religion at University Rania Hafez Recently universities have found themselves torn between upholding values of academic freedom, of free speech and expression on campus, and pandering to a new orthodoxy that defines students as vulnerable adults and likely to be 'damaged' by contrary opinions. This has been most marked when it comes to issues of faith and students' religious identity and beliefs. This chapter considers the contradictory position universities find themselves in, on one hand seeking to protect students' religious sensibilities by sanctioning illiberal practices and restricting criticism, and on the other seeking to limit freedom of expression by banning certain faith speakers in the fear they will 'radicalise' vulnerable students. It will reflect on the troubled relationship between religion and the academy, especially as the current government seeks to conscript universities and their staff in surveillance over the thoughts and leanings of their students. This is not simply a case of academic freedom under attack, it is more fundamental and far reaching. The current troubled relationship between religion and universities is a manifestation of something far more serious: that we as a society have lost faith in the academy. Religion in the Academy Religion might have an ambivalent presence on university campuses nowadays but faith and the academic tradition have a long history. From the medieval monasteries of Europe that instituted the education of monks and priests to the heyday of Islamic scholarship that saw the establishment of Baghdad’s House of Wisdom (Lyons 2009), Christianity and Islam both acted as catalysts in transmitting ancient philosophical traditions and building on them.
    [Show full text]
  • Framing Secular Women's Rights in Contemporary Britain
    Article Leviathan: Interdisciplinary Journal in English No. 1, 60-124 © The Journal Editors 2017 Framing Secular Reprints and permissions: https://tidsskrift.dk/lev DOI: 10.7146/lev.v0i1.96783 Women’s Rights in Recommendation: Sara Dybris McQuaid Contemporary ([email protected]) Britain and Beyond: 0 Challenges and Implications Martin Rosendal Ehlers ABSTRACT This thesis argues that a group of women from Muslim majority communities campaigning against Sharia law in Britain is challenging group rights multicultural discourse, and that this challenge is quite serious. The thesis’ premise is based on decentering. Instead of looking at their campaign through the lens of multicultural theory, the campaigners are given the proverbial first and last word against their intellectual adversaries. This is done for the purpose of added value – there is limited literature in the field privileging this position. The theory used consists of frame analysis with added insights from critical theory and critical discourse analysis, as power and the concept of hegemony are central to the case. It is concluded that the way the women frame their campaign and their politics does indeed challenge group rights multicultural discourse. Keywords: Islam, Muslims, women’s rights, multiculturalism, framing, critical discourse analysis, hegemony, Sharia, discourse, Britain, universalism, Islamism Corresponding author: Martin Rosendal Ehlers ([email protected]) Department of English, Aarhus University 61 Table of Contents Summary (62) 1: Introduction (63-66) 2: Theory
    [Show full text]
  • December 2017
    The Enlightenment A Mini-Journal of the Humanist Association of London and Area Visit Our Web Site at www.humanists-london.org Volume 13 Number 12 December 2017 DEFIANT EARTH: The Fate of Humans in the Anthropocene by Clive Hamilton Reviewed by Rosslyn Ives Hamilton’s aim in Defiant Earth is to set out a compelling case for how humans have become major agents affecting the functioning of the Earth System. In this book he argues that humans have become so powerful we have disrupted the functioning of the Earth, bringing on a new geological epoch, the Anthropocene. As he reminds readers, from the beginning of the Industrial Revolution humans have been responsible for huge changes on Earth, including the consequences of burning fossil fuels. Since the rapid growth in the post-Second World War period of land clearing, manufacturing and resource use these changes have accelerated. The carbon dioxide from fossil fuels has caused global warming, climate change, ice melts and acidification of the oceans, among other significant system changes. In other words, humans have become a major agent for change, augmenting the blind forces of nature This is a challenging book to read, because Hamilton is setting out the evidence and arguments for a paradigm shift in how the Earth System ought to be understood. Instead of perceiving ourselves as simply products of evolution living on a planet that sustains our livelihood, we need to see ourselves as active agents affecting how the Earth System functions. This has led scientists to apply the concept of the Anthropocene epoch, a time when humans are significant agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Moderate Muslim Networks
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Support RAND Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Center for Middle East Public Policy View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Building Moderate Muslim Networks Angel Rabasa Cheryl Benard Lowell H. Schwartz Peter Sickle Sponsored by the Smith Richardson Foundation CENTER FOR MIDDLE EAST PUBLIC POLICY The research described in this report was sponsored by the Smith Richardson Foundation and was conducted under the auspices of the RAND Center for Middle East Public Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Terror(Izing) the "Veil"
    Please do not remove this page Terror(izing) the "Veil" Aziz, Sahar F. https://scholarship.libraries.rutgers.edu/discovery/delivery/01RUT_INST:ResearchRepository/12643454820004646?l#13643523030004646 Aziz, S. F. (2014). Terror(izing) the “Veil.” In Simeon O. Ilesanmi (Ed.), The Rule of Law and the Rule of God (pp. 207–232). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.7282/T34171MT This work is protected by copyright. You are free to use this resource, with proper attribution, for research and educational purposes. Other uses, such as reproduction or publication, may require the permission of the copyright holder. Downloaded On 2021/09/24 10:49:03 -0400 1 Terror(izing) the “Veil” By Sahar F. Aziz1 “We should never pass judgment on barrels and barrels of apples just because one of them may be rotten.”2 -- Justice John Paul Stevens The September 11th terrorist attacks transformed the meaning of the Muslim headscarf.3 No longer is the crux of the debate whether the “veil” is used to oppress women by controlling their sexuality, and by extension, their personal freedoms and life choices. Rather, a Muslim headscarf “marks” her as a representative of the suspicious, inherently violent, and forever foreign “Terrorist other” in our midst.4 In the post-9/11 era, many Muslim women donning a headscarf find themselves trapped at the intersection of bias against Islam, the racialized Muslim, and women. In contrast to their male counterparts, Muslim women face unique forms of discrimination not adequately addressed by Muslim civil rights advocacy organizations,
    [Show full text]
  • No Sharia Law in Britain Maryam Namazie of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain Spoke Against Sharia Law
    No Sharia Law in Britain Maryam Namazie of the Council of ex-Muslims of Britain spoke against Sharia Law. Sharia law is an important issue for people living means that it works. The fact that her son went to in Britain, as well as across the world. To highlight see her a few days ago and she said that for the it, I want to start with a case that I have been first time she had hope as a result of all the people working on these past few weeks. It’s the case of who had come out in her defence shows that it Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani. She’s a mother of makes a difference and it has an impact. I am here two who is facing death by stoning in Iran for to ask you also to step in and intervene on her ‘adultery.’ Under Sharia law, the penalty for behalf; I’m sure many of you have already done adultery is death by stoning. Women are buried up that. Her lawyer is in hiding now, he has been to their chests, men up to their waists and the law interrogated, his wife and his brother-in-law have even specifies the size of been arrested. Her son has the stone to be used in the been called for stoning. Sakineh was due interrogation a number of to be executed by stoning times to ask why and how a few weeks ago. When this international campaign there was no legal recourse has taken the scope that it remaining, her 22-year-old has, how her picture got son, Sajjad, wrote an open out to the public and so on letter, together with his and so forth.
    [Show full text]
  • Correspondence-With-Government
    AN OPEN LETTER TO PRIME MINISTER DAVID CAMERON Time to Dismantle the Parallel Legal System: Call from 395 Signatories 10th December 2015 Prime Minister David Cameron 10 Downing St London SW1A 2AA Dear Prime Minister Women’s rights and secular organisations urge the new government to take concerted measures to stop the development of parallel legal systems and to facilitate full and proper access to justice for all citizens and to one secular law for all. For decades, successive governments have appeased undemocratic religious power brokers in minority communities who have sought to gain power through multicultural and now multi- faith social policies. These policies have led to the homogenisation of minority communities including the ‘Muslim community’ and have recognised and legitimated ‘non-violent’ Islamists as ‘community representatives’, outsourcing legal justice to what are in effect kangaroo courts that deliver highly discriminatory and second-rate forms of ‘justice.’ Over the years, we have witnessed with increasing alarm the influence of ‘Sharia courts’ over the lives of citizens of Muslim heritage. Any government inquiry into ‘Sharia courts’ must also examine the impact of the draconian cuts in legal aid that have adversely affected access to justice for the most vulnerable. Many abused women from minority backgrounds, for instance, are increasingly forced to either represent themselves in court in what are often complex family legal proceedings or go to ‘Sharia courts’ that operate entirely outside the rule of law. The loss of legal aid contributes to a context that is conducive to the consolidation of privatised and unaccountable forms of justice and ‘Sharia courts’ are amongst the main beneficiaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Islam Councils
    THE MUSLIM QUESTION IN EUROPE Peter O’Brien THE MUSLIM QUESTION IN EUROPE Political Controversies and Public Philosophies TEMPLE UNIVERSITY PRESS Philadelphia • Rome • Tokyo TEMPLE UNIVERSITY PRESS Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122 www.temple.edu/tempress Copyright © 2016 by Temple University—Of Th e Commonwealth System of Higher Education All rights reserved Published 2016 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: O’Brien, Peter, 1960– author. Title: Th e Muslim question in Europe : political controversies and public philosophies / Peter O’Brien. Description: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania : Temple University Press, 2016. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifi ers: LCCN 2015040078| ISBN 9781439912768 (cloth : alk. paper) | ISBN 9781439912775 (paper : alk. paper) | ISBN 9781439912782 (e-book) Subjects: LCSH: Muslims—Europe—Politics and government. | Islam and politics—Europe. Classifi cation: LCC D1056.2.M87 O27 2016 | DDC 305.6/97094—dc23 LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2015040078 Th e paper used in this publication meets the requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1992 Printed in the United States of America 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 For Andre, Grady, Hannah, Galen, Kaela, Jake, and Gabriel Contents Acknowledgments ix 1 Introduction: Clashes within Civilization 1 2 Kulturkampf 24 3 Citizenship 65 4 Veil 104 5 Secularism 144 6 Terrorism 199 7 Conclusion: Messy Politics 241 Aft erword 245 References 249 Index 297 Acknowledgments have accumulated many debts in the gestation of this study. Arleen Harri- son superintends an able and amiable cadre of student research assistants I without whose reliable and competent support this book would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • FFRF, AHA Ask High Court to Let Cross Win Stand
    Wonders of the Best way For minorities, universe written to honor is to reason can lead in Stardust become an ally to equality PAGE 13 PAGES 14-15 PAGE 24 Vol. 35 No. 10 Published by the Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. December 2018 Convention attention FFRF sues over Wisconsin’s DOJ chaplaincy program The Freedom From Religon 4, but had been in the works Foundation is legally contesting for at least a year. a Wisconsin religion-centered Schimel claims that the counseling state program. chaplaincy program is a “crit- In a lawsuit filed Nov. 13 in ical component” of the DOJ, a Dane County court, FFRF is and has urged other state challenging agencies to contact the DOJ the constitu- staff to start their own chap- tionality of a laincy programs. Six all-white faith-based men from Christian faiths, employee many conservative, have been chaplaincy formally appointed DOJ chap- that Wis- lains. Although unpaid, the six consin At- agency chaplains are under the torney Gen- direction of a paid DOJ chap- eral Brad laincy program coordinator Schimel cre- Brad Schimel and have received training and Photo by Ingrid Laas ated at the reimbursement at taxpayer Comedian Julia Sweeney (right) takes a selfie with former Planned Parenthood president state Department of Justice. expense. They’re issued DOJ Cecile Richards during FFRF’s national convention in San Francisco the weekend of Nov. Schimel, who was defeated identification and building ac- 2-4. A record 986 people attended this year’s convention, from 42 states, Puerto Rico and in his bid for re-election on cess cards and are not prohib- Washington, D.C., and from Canada and the U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 22 Rationally Speaking #227: Sarah Haider on “Dissent
    Rationally Speaking #227: Sarah Haider on “Dissent and free speech” Julia: Welcome to Rationally Speaking, the podcast where we explore the borderlands between reason and nonsense. I'm your host, Julia Galef, and my guest today is Sarah Haider. Sarah is a writer, speaker and the executive director of the Ex-Muslims of North America. Sarah, welcome to Rationally Speaking. Sarah: Really good to be here Julia. Thank you for having me. Julia: I'm a big fan of your presence on Twitter, for what that's worth. You're one of my role models for engaging with disagreement in a careful and eloquent and intellectually honest way. So I'm having a fangirl moment right now. Sarah: Oh wow. That's in itself such a compliment because I love your presence on Twitter as well. Julia: So, the arc for this conversation that I was thinking made sense -- I'd really like to talk first about your work with the Ex-Muslims of North America. What you do, what you've learned from the experience, about the issues or about successful activism. And then transition from there into some broader topics that I've seen you discuss interestingly on Twitter and some of your other interviews. Having to do with free speech and liberalism and justice and things like that. So, small talk. Sarah: Sure. Yeah. Julia: Why don't we start by describing what the Ex-Muslims of North America does. Sarah: Right. So, Ex-Muslims of North America, we are now in our sixth year, so we are still a relatively young organization, but we're starting to grow up a little bit.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamophobia
    Islamophobia An Anthology of Concerns Edited by Emma Webb Islamophobia Islamophobia An Anthology of Concerns Edited by Emma Webb First Published August 2019 © Civitas 2019 55 Tufton Street London SW1P 3QL email: [email protected] All rights reserved ISBN 978-1-906837-98-3 Independence: Civitas: Institute for the Study of Civil Society is a registered educational charity (No. 1085494) and a company limited by guarantee (No. 04023541). Civitas is financed from a variety of private sources to avoid over-reliance on any single or small group of donors. All the Institute’s publications seek to further its objective of promoting the advancement of learning. The views expressed are those of the authors, not of the Institute. Typeset by Typetechnique Printed in Great Britain by 4edge Limited, Essex iv ‘This comprehensive anthology of widespread concerns about the danger to free speech and legitimate discussion in the use of the vague catch-all term Islamophobia, is both timely and welcome. ‘The report will not only help protect free speech and legitimate criticism, but also help us understand why Muslims and other religious communities are sometimes the target for hate crimes that shame society. Perpetrators of such crimes do not carry out a detailed study of a religion before expressing antipathy. Hatred arises out of ignorance in which small differences can assume frightening and threatening proportions. It can only be removed through greater emphasis on religious and cultural literacy.’ Lord Singh of Wimbledon ‘Islamophobia is an otiose word which doesn’t deserve definition. Hatred of Muslims is unequivocally reprehensible, as is hatred of any group of people such as gay people or members of a race.
    [Show full text]