Electronic Document Distribution Why I Can't Read Microsoft Word
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Electronic Document Preparation Pocket Primer
Electronic Document Preparation Pocket Primer Vít Novotný December 4, 2018 Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (cc by 3.0) Contents Introduction 1 1 Writing 3 1.1 Text Processing 4 1.1.1 Character Encoding 4 1.1.2 Text Input 12 1.1.3 Text Editors 13 1.1.4 Interactive Document Preparation Systems 13 1.1.5 Regular Expressions 14 1.2 Version Control 17 2 Markup 21 2.1 Meta Markup Languages 22 2.1.1 The General Markup Language 22 2.1.2 The Extensible Markup Language 23 2.2 Markup on the World Wide Web 28 2.2.1 The Hypertext Markup Language 28 2.2.2 The Extensible Hypertext Markup Language 29 2.2.3 The Semantic Web and Linked Data 31 2.3 Document Preparation Systems 32 2.3.1 Batch-oriented Systems 35 2.3.2 Interactive Systems 36 2.4 Lightweight Markup Languages 39 3 Design 41 3.1 Fonts 41 3.2 Structural Elements 42 3.2.1 Paragraphs and Stanzas 42 iv CONTENTS 3.2.2 Headings 45 3.2.3 Tables and Lists 46 3.2.4 Notes 46 3.2.5 Quotations 47 3.3 Page Layout 48 3.4 Color 48 3.4.1 Theory 48 3.4.2 Schemes 51 Bibliography 53 Acronyms 61 Index 65 Introduction With the advent of the digital age, typesetting has become available to virtually anyone equipped with a personal computer. Beautiful text documents can now be crafted using free and consumer-grade software, which often obviates the need for the involvement of a professional designer and typesetter. -
AD SUMMATION DII/Edii Guide
AD SUMMATION DII/eDII Guide A Guide for Service Bureaus Published: June 2004 Updated: June 2011 ABSTRACT This document provides information about the AD Summation DII/eDII file to service bureaus. The Table of Contents serves as an outline of the electronic discovery (eDiscovery) workflow from the perspective of a service bureau. This document also discusses changes to the structure of the DII file that allow for the batch loading of electronic discovery, and provides a reference of new DII tokens used for email messages and electronic documents. This document assumes prior knowledge of DII files, their structure, and tokens. This document is geared toward service bureaus that deliver data and eDiscovery to the client in the form of native files, images, full- text, fielded data, or any combination thereof. Copyright Information © 2011 AccessData Group. All rights reserved. The information contained in this document represents the current view of AD Summation on the issues discussed as of the date of publication. Because AccessData must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of AccessData, and AccessData cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information presented after the date of publication. This white paper is for informational purposes only. ACCESSDATA MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, IN THIS DOCUMENT. Complying with all applicable copyright laws is the responsibility of the user. Without limiting the rights under copyright, no part of this document may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) or for any purpose, without the express written permission of AccessData. -
Electronic Document Technol
Abstract Electronic Document Technology Standards PDF, PDF/A, OOXML, OpenDocument. What is the alphabet soup? In recent years technologists and Signatures have been attempting to make electronic documents more transportable across systems and displays as well as improving their usability. This session will explain these various document E-Courts 2008, Las Vegas formats and how your court can use the technology to improve data capture, display, and information security. Erik Wilde, UC Berkeley School of Information December 9, 2008 This work is licensed under a CC Attribution 3.0 Unported License About this Presentation About Me Outline Outline 1. About this Presentation [6] 1. About this Presentation [6] 1. About Me [1] 1. About Me [1] 2. About ISD [5] 2. About ISD [5] 2. Document Standards [18] 2. Document Standards [18] 3. Document Security [7] 3. Document Security [7] About Me About ISD Computer Science at Technical University of Berlin (TUB) (88-91) Ph.D. at ETH Zürich (92-97) Post-Doc at ICSI, Berkeley (97/98) Outline Various activities back in Switzerland (98-06) teaching at ETH Zürich and FHNW 1. About this Presentation [6] working as independent consultant (training, courses, consulting) 1. About Me [1] research in various XML-related areas 2. About ISD [5] Professor at the School of Information (since Fall 2006) 2. Document Standards [18] Technical Director of the Information and Service Design (ISD) program 3. Document Security [7] Information and Service Design (ISD) Information-Intensive Applications Part of UC Berkeley's -
Difference Between Electronic and Paper Documents in Principle, Electronic Discovery Is No Different Than Paper Discovery
1 The Difference between Electronic and Paper Documents In principle, electronic discovery is no different than paper discovery. All sorts of documents are subject to discovery electronic or otherwise. But here is where the commonality ends. There are substantial differences between the discoveries of the two media. The following is a list of discovery-related differences between electronic documents and paper ones. We assume that a paper document is a document that was created, maintained, and used manually as a paper documents; it is simply a hard copy of an electronic document. 1.1 The magnitude of electronic data is way larger than paper documents This point is obvious to the majority of observers. Today’s typical disks are at several dozens gigabytes and these sizes grow constantly. A typical medium-size company will have PC’s on the desks of most white-collar workers, company-related data, accounting and order information, personnel information, a potential for several databases and company servers, an email server, backup tapes, etc. Such a company will easily have several terabytes of information. Accordingly1, such a company has over 2 million documents. Just one personal hard drive can contain 1.5 million pages of data, and one corporate backup tape can contain 4 million pages of data. Thus the magnitude of electronic data that needs to be handled in discovery is staggering. In most corporate civil lawsuits, several backup tapes, hard drives, and removable media are involved.2 1.2 Variety of electronic documents is larger than paper documents Paper documents are ledgers, personnel files, notes, memos, letters, articles, papers, pictures, etc. -
A Guide to Making Documents Accessible to People Who Are Blind Or Visually Impaired by Jennifer Sutton
A Guide to Making Documents Accessible to People Who Are Blind or Visually Impaired by Jennifer Sutton The inclusion of products or services in the body of this guide and the accompanying appendices should not be viewed as an endorsement by the American Council of the Blind. Resources have been compiled for informational purposes only, and the American Council of the Blind makes no guarantees regarding the accessibility or quality of the cited references. For further information, or to provide feedback, contact the American Council of the Blind at the address, telephone number, or e-mail address below. If you encounter broken links in this guide, please alert us by sending e-mail to [email protected]. Published by the American Council of the Blind 1155 15th St. NW Suite 1004 Washington, DC 20005 (202) 467-5081 Fax: (202) 467-5085 Toll-free: (800) 424-8666 Web site: http://www.acb.org E-mail: [email protected]. This document is available online, in regular print, large print, braille, or on cassette tape. Copyright 2002 American Council of the Blind Acknowledgements The American Council of the Blind wishes to recognize and thank AT&T for its generous donation to support the development of this technical assistance guide to producing documents in alternate formats. In addition, many individuals too numerous to mention contributed to the development of this project. Colleagues demonstrated a strong commitment to equal access to information for everyone by offering suggestions regarding content, and a handful of experts spent time reviewing and critiquing drafts. The author is grateful for all of the assistance and support she received.