The Dialectics of Diaspora in Contemporary Modernity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Dialectics of Diaspora in Contemporary Modernity chapter 20 The Dialectics of Diaspora in Contemporary Modernity Lars Dencik Diaspora: The Origin and Carrier of Jewish Culture Dwelling far from one’s homeland is a frequently re-occurring Ur-Geschichte in the stories of the Bible. In Jewish history in general, it constitutes what scholars of literature would call a leitmotiv. Just recall the story of Abraham, who was told by God to leave his home in Ur in Chaldea (located close to where the river Euphrates joins the river Tigris in the south of present-day Iraq) to go the land of Israel. But circumstances there soon forced him to leave the country to seek better conditions outside the Promised Land—in Egypt. Later on, it was there, under the rule of the Egyptian Pharaoh, that Joseph lived—the son of another of Judaism’s “founding fathers” Jacob, whom God named Israel. And the Jews, as is re-told every year at the Passover ceremony, were slaves until a man with a clearly Egyptian name, Moses, removed the Jews from the land and out of slavery. While roaming for 40 years in the desert, i.e. in no-man’s land, the crowd that Moses had liberated became shaped as a people—again, outside the Promised Land (a land that Moses had in sight, but—I think this is sym- bolically significant—never entered). And there, in the desert of Sinai, accord- ing to the myth, the primary source of Jewish identity, the Torah, comprising the essence of Jewish wisdom and laws, was given to the Jewish people and through them to all humanity. After a not very long period as rulers (the Kingdom of David and Solomon lasted for less than a hundred years from about the year 1000 B.C.E.), and a relatively short period as a sedentary people in what had been the land of the Canaanites and other peoples—a period described in the historiographic books of the Hebrew Bible, the Book of Joshua, The Book of Judges, the Books of Kings, Samuel and the former prophets, and in many respects dealing with the problems of authority and obedience—the Jews again had to hit the road. In the year 586 B.C.E., Jerusalem and the first Temple were destroyed and the leadership and tribe of Judah forced into the Babylonian Exile, to live in an area called Mesopotamia. There, to quote the Psalm (137), “By the rivers © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���4 | doi ��.��63/9789004�77076_��� 406 dencik of Babylon, there we sat down; yea, we wept when we remembered Zion.” It is interesting in this context to note the remark by the historian Martin Gilbert in his The Atlas of Jewish History (1993) about the map of the first Jewish disper- sion 722–586 B.C.E. Gilbert cites “Cities in which the Jews settled after their dispersal” and adds the following comment: “The Jews quickly established vig- orous intellectual and merchant communities throughout the ‘Diaspora’ or area of dispersal” (Gilbert, 1993: 7). Against this background one may ask: what would Jewish culture have been today had the Jews remained a tribe in the Judean desert? What would have happened had the Jews not been forced into the Babylonian Exile 2,500 years ago when the remnants of the divided kingdoms of Israel and Judah were con- quered and Solomon’s temple, i.e. the First Temple, destroyed? What would have happened had the Jews not become “dispersed among the nations” little more than 500 years later; that is, a little less than 2,000 years ago, as a conse- quence of Jerusalem’s looting by Roman soldiers under Titus, son of the Emperor, and their leveling Herod’s temple, i.e. the Second Temple (leaving only the ruins of one of its outer supporting walls—today’s Western Wall (in Hebrew: Kotel). As we are repeatedly told in present-day Israel, in the year 73 the last fighting forces in the land of Israel at that time committed collective suicide in a heroic gesture at Masada. If the Jews had not become “dispersed among the nations” what would have been the fate of Jewish culture? No one, of course, can answer this question. But it is a matter of fact that Jewish culture as we know it is largely a Diaspora product and most of the texts that express, carry, and are salient and significant to, Jewish culture were written and com- piled in the Jewish Diaspora. The very word “diaspora” emerges for the first time in written history in the Greek translation of the Hebrew bible, where it means approximately “to cul- tivate over wide areas.” In the Bible it appears in Deuteronomy 28 when the Lord threatens to “disperse among the peoples” (verse 64) his Chosen People, should they diverge from what He has proscribed to be the “right way.” In a story about an unsuccessful fight led by the Jewish leader, Zedekiah, against the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar, we confront what could be regarded a mythical matrix in Jewish narration regarding the Jewish people’s relationship to seizing worldly, or rather territorial, power. According to the biblical text (Kings II 25, vii), the territory-seeking Jewish leader Zedekiah is punished in three ways: (a) his sons are killed, as it is said, in front of his eyes. This may be interpreted: he shall be aware that there will be nobody to carry on and preserve the teachings and the culture of ancient Israel, i.e. of Jewish thought; (b) he is blinded so that he, as it is said, becomes sightless. This may be inter- preted: he will no longer be able to orient himself through life, that is, unable .
Recommended publications
  • Israel Israel (Ancient)
    441 Israel (Ancient), History of 442 his way home. The virtually silent journey opens consisting mainly of people from the former king- with this message: dom of Judah (Ezek 2 : 3; 3 : 1; etc.; Ezra 7 : 13); I tried. I think you would all agree that I tried. To be (6) “true” Israel, consisting of returnees from true, to be strong, to be kind, to love, to be right, but Babylonian exile in contrast to those who had re- I wasn’t. And I know you knew this, in each of your mained in the land who were regarded as compro- ways. And I am sorry. All is lost here, except for soul mised (e.g., Ezra 2 : 59; 4 : 3; 6 : 16; Neh 7 : 61; and body, that is what’s left of it, and a half day’s ra- 11 : 20; 13 : 3). tion. It’s inexcusable, I know that now. How it could For the reception of the Bible in the modern have taken this long to admit that, I’m not sure, but it State of Israel, see “Western Asia.” did. I fought to the end. I’m not sure what that is Steven L. McKenzie worth, but know that I did. I’ve always hoped for more for you all. I will miss you. I’m sorry. See also /Holy Land; /Israel (Ancient), History / / It takes the experience of separation to understand of; Israel, Land of; Israel, People of; / / his life and to see his place in his world. Whether Israelite Religion; Israelites, Children/Sons of / / he finds his way home remains an open question.
    [Show full text]
  • Saul, Benjamin, and the Emergence of Monarchy in Israel
    SAUL, BENJAMIN, AND THE EMERGENCE OF MONARCHY IN ISRAEL Press SBL ANCIENT ISRAEL AND ITS LITERATURE Thomas C. Römer, General Editor Editorial Board: Susan Ackerman Thomas B. Dozeman Alphonso Groenewald Shuichi Hasegawa Konrad Schmid Naomi A. Steinberg Number 40 Press SBL SAUL, BENJAMIN, AND THE EMERGENCE OF MONARCHY IN ISRAEL Biblical and Archaeological Perspectives Edited by Joachim J. Krause, Omer Sergi, and Kristin Weingart Press SBL Atlanta Copyright © 2020 by SBL Press All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by means of any information storage or retrieval system, except as may be expressly permit- ted by the 1976 Copyright Act or in writing from the publisher. Requests for permission should be addressed in writing to the Rights and Permissions Office, SBL Press, 825 Hous- ton Mill Road, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Krause, Joachim J., editor. | Sergi, Omer, 1977– editor. | Weingart, Kristin, 1974– editor. Other titles: Ancient Israel and its literature ; no. 40. Title: Saul, Benjamin and the emergence of monarchy in Israel : biblical and archaeological perspectives / edited by Joachim J. Krause, Omer Sergi, and Kristin Weingart. Description: Atlanta : SBL Press, 2020. | Series: Ancient Israel and its literature ; 40 | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2020012825 (print) | LCCN 2020012826 (ebook) | ISBN 9781628372816 (paperback) | ISBN 9780884144502 (hardback) | ISBN 9780884144519 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Saul, King of Israel. | Benjamin (Biblical figure) | Bible. Samuel. | Bible. Kings. | Jews—Kings and rulers. | Monarchy—Palestine—History. | Excavations (Archaeology)—Palestine.
    [Show full text]
  • The Names and Boundaries of Eretz-Israel (Palestine) As Reflections of Stages in Its History
    THE NAMES AND BOUNDARIES OF ERETZ-ISRAEL (PALESTINE) AS REFLECTIONS OF STAGES IN ITS HISTORY GIDEON BIGER INTRODUCTION Classical historical geography focuses on research of the boundaries of the various states, along with the historical development of these boundaries over time. Edward Freeman, in his book written in 1881 and entitled The Historical Geography of Europe, defines the nature of historical-geographical research as follows: "The work which we have now before us is to trace out the extent of territory which the different states and nations have held at different times in the world's history, to mark the different boundaries which the same country has had and the different meanings in which the same name has been used." The author further claims that "it is of great importance carefully to make these distinctions, because great mistakes as to the facts of history are often caused through men thinking and speaking as if the names of different countries have always meant exactly the same extent of territory. "1 Although this approach - which regards research on boundaries as the essence of historical geography- is not accepted at present, the claim that it is necessary to define the extent of territory over history is as valid today as ever. It is impossible to discuss the development of any geographical area having political and territorial significance without knowing and understanding its physical extent. Of no less significance for such research are the names attached to any particular expanse. The naming of a place is the first step in defining it politically and historically.
    [Show full text]
  • The Key to the Bible
    Kingdom Parables - 1 1 The Key To The Bible The Mysteries of the Bible Revealed The 7 Kingdom Parables of Matthew 13 UNLOCKING THE KEY TO THE BIBLE The Kingdom Parables of Matthew 13 Jesus plainly states that the parables of Matthew 13 are "given unto you to know the mysteries of the Kingdom of heaven (Matthew 13:11). He begins each parable by saying, "The kingdom of heaven is like unto," and then He shares a glimpse into the realm of His kingdom by giving seven parables in order to enable the believer to understand what "the kingdom of heaven" is. These seven parables are a key unlocking the "mysteries of the kingdom." A correct definition of these parables will supply an understanding of what Christ is accomplishing in the world today and what His intention for the future is. These parables cannot refer to "Heaven," our eternal home, nor can they refer to the "Church" of which Christ is the Head. We will see in this study that New Testament Scriptures conclusively refute both of these definitions. The believer should never be satisfied with these explanations, but rather search for a correct definition, or there will be little in Scripture that he will adequately understand. The dictionary can help to understand what a "kingdom" is. It states that a "kingdom is a royal authority, a sovereign power, a rule, a dominion." The term "kingdom" refers mainly, not to territory, but, rather to authority...not to locality, but to sovereignty. Thus, "the kingdom of heaven" is when and where Christ rules and reigns.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hebraic Perspective - Who the Messiah?
    The Hebraic perspective - Who the Messiah? Since the days of Moses, what were the people expecting from the Prophet that Moses foretold would appear (Deut 18). Were they expecting a King, a Prophet, or a Priest. Were they expecting 1, 2 or even 3 Messiahs? Today there is a common Jewish understanding that there will be two ‘end-times’ Messiah’s: “A Kabbalistic tradition within Judaism is that the commonly-discussed messiah who will usher in a period of freedom and peace (Messiah ben David) will be preceded by Messiah ben Joseph, who will die sacrificing himself while uniting all of Israel in preparing the world for the arrival of Messiah ben David.” – see http://www.aish.com/tp/i/moha/48909612.html The Qumran scrolls, the Book of Jubilees and the Testaments of the Tribes—all of which are close to the Essene1 worldview and written prior to the first century of the Common Era, reflected the belief in three messiahs: an eschatological messiah, along with the messiahs of Aaron and Israel. So what were the characteristics of this eschatological (end-times) Messiah? Messiah is the English transliteration from the Hebrew ‘Mashiach’ meaning ‘anointed one’ i.e. someone chosen specially by God for some purpose. This term is translated into ‘Christos’ in Greek and then to ‘Christ’ in English. The term occurs some 37 times in the Hebrew Scriptures (KJV OT version - Strong’s #H4886) and is not always a prophetic reference to the eschatological Messiah. It is used to refer to the kings of Israel, the high priest, the patriarchs, as well as the Assyrian Cyrus (see Isaiah 45).
    [Show full text]
  • Memories of a Golden Age? I25 of Kiriyat Yearim West Ofjerusalem
    [ 5 ] M emories of a Golden Age? In the Temple and royal palace of Jerusalem, biblical Israel found its per­ manent spiritual focus after centuries of struggle and wandering. As the books of Samuel narrate, the anointing of David, son ofJesse, as king over all the tribes oflsrael finalized the process that had begun with God's orig­ inal promise to Abraham so many centuries before. The violent chaos of the period of the Judges now gave way to a time in which_God's promises could be established securely under a righteous king. Though the first choice for the throne oflsrael had been the brooding, handsome Saul from the tribe of Benjamin, it was his successor David who became the central figure in early Israelite history. Of the fabled King David, songs and stories were nearly without number. They told of his slaying the mighty Goliath with a single sling stone; of his adoption into the royal court for his skill as a harpist; of his adventures as a rebel and freebooter; of his lustful pursuit of Bathsheba; and of his conquests of Jerusalem and a vast empire beyond. His son Solomon, in turn, is remembered as the wisest of kings and the greatest of builders. Stories tell of his brilliant judgments, his unimaginable wealth; and his construction of the great Temple in Jerusalem. For centuries, Bible readers all over the world have looked back to the era of David and Solomon as a golden age in Israel's history. Until recently many scholars have agreed that the united monarchy was the first biblical I2J I24 THE BIBLE UNEARTHED period that could truly be considered historical.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Aloysius Religious Education 6Th Grade Salvation History – a Review in Pictures
    St. Aloysius Religious Education 6th grade Salvation History – a review in pictures 1 Creation Genesis *There is one God who is ever present, all powerful and all knowing *Reveals God is the source of all life *God created the world in 7 days 1. Light 2. Sky 3. Land, sea and plants 4. Son, moon and stars 5. Creatures of the sea and sky 6. Animals and people 7. Rest *We were created in the image and likeness of God with free will and conscience *There is a call for respect of others and our world (human dignity and stewardship) 2 Adam & Eve Genesis *God created man and then woman came from man (we all share the same human dignity and are equal – we are united to one another and we all have one true father -- God) *Created humans with a soul – this makes us different from other living creatures – our soul will never die – it is immortal *Garden of Eden symbolizes perfect happiness and harmony with God and one another *There is a warning from God to Adam and Eve not to eat the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge *Eve is tempted by the serpent (devil) *God gave us free will – the power to choose good/evil *Eve eats and has Adam eat fruit. God is disobeyed. He makes Adam & Eve leave the Garden of Eden *This fall of mankind is called original sin – it s weakened human nature *Baptism washes away original sin 1 3 Cain Kills Abel Genesis *Adam and Eve have two sons, Cain and Abel *Abel is a shepherd and Cain works in the fields *They make offerings to God – God is pleased with Abel’s, but not with Cain’s *Why?? This is an indication that we cannot always understand the ways of God and should not try and judge his ways *Cain thought he had been treated unjustly – he is angry – he takes his resentment out on his brother by killing him *God asks Cain where Abel is – he answers, “I do not know.
    [Show full text]
  • King David Kills Biblical Minimalism Edited from an Article by Yosef Garfinkel
    BAR 37:03, May/Jun 2011 King David kills Biblical Minimalism Edited from an article By Yosef Garfinkel “Biblical minimalism,” as it is known, has gone through a number of permutations in the recent past. Its modern career began about 30 years ago, when BAR was still a youngster. Since then it has been part of the ongoing debate regarding the extent to which historical data are embedded in the Hebrew Bible. In the mid-1980s the principal argument involved the dating of the final writing of the text of the Hebrew Bible. The minimalist school claimed then that it had been written only in the Hellenistic period, nearly 700 years after the time of David and Solomon, and that the Biblical descriptions were therefore purely literary. The main developers of this position were centered at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark (Niels Peter Lemche and expatriate-American Thomas Thompson) and in England (Philip Davies and Keith Whitelam). The titles of their books tell us what they were about: a search for the real Israel of the Biblical period (if indeed there was a real Israel). Thus Lemche (1988): Ancient Israel: A New History of Israelite Society; Thompson (1992): Early History of the Israelite People; Davies (1992): In Search of “Ancient Israel”; and Whitelam (1997): The Invention of Ancient Israel. Much of the discussion focused on the Biblical narrative about the tenth century B.C.E., the time of David and Solomon, the period known as the United Monarchy. Was there a United Monarchy? Were David and Solomon kings of a real state? Indeed, did they actually exist? Or were they simply literary creations of the Biblical writers? For the minimalists, King David was “about as historical as King Arthur.”a The name David had never been found in an ancient inscription.
    [Show full text]
  • UT102 Dead Sea Scrolls Bklt.Qxp
    THE DEAD SEA SCROLLS : THE TRUTH BEHIND THE MYSTIQUE COURSE GUIDE Professor Lawrence H. Schiffman NEW YORK UNIVERSITY The Dead Sea Scrolls: The Truth Behind the Mystique Professor Lawrence H. Schiffman New York University Recorded Books ™ is a trademark of Recorded Books, LLC. All rights reserved. The Dead Sea Scrolls: The Truth Behind the Mystique Executive Producer John J. Alexander Executive Editor Donna F. Carnahan RECORDING Producer - David Markowitz Director - Matthew Cavnar COURSE GUIDE Editor - James Gallagher Karen Sparrough Design - Edward White Lecture content ©2007 by Lawrence H. Schiffman Course guide ©2007 by Recorded Books, LLC Cover image: © Joseph Calev/shutterstock.com 72007 by Recorded Books, LLC #UT102 ISBN: 978-1-4281-5625-8 All beliefs and opinions expressed in this audio/video program and accompanying course guide are those of the author and not of Recorded Books, LLC, or its employees. Course Syllabus The Dead Sea Scrolls: The Truth Behind the Mystique About Your Professor ................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 5 Lecture 1 The Library of Qumran .......................................................................... 6 Lecture 2 Scandal and Publication ...................................................................... 12 Lecture 3 Sects of the Second Temple Period ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Great United Monarchy?
    A Great United Monarchy? Archaeological and Historical Perspectives* ISRAEL FINKELSTEIN Twelve years have passed since I first presented – to the German Insti- tute in Jerusalem – my ideas on the chronology of the Iron Age strata in the Levant and how it impacts on our understanding of the biblical narrative on the United Monarchy of ancient Israel.1 I was naïve enough then to believe that the logic of my ‘correction’ was straight- forward and clear. Twelve years and many articles and public debates later, however, the notion of Davidic conquests, Solomonic building projects, and a glamorous United Monarchy – all based on an uncritical reading of the biblical text and in contradiction of archaeological finds – is still alive in certain quarters. This paper presents my updated views on this matter, and tackles several recent claims that archaeology has now proven the historicity of the biblical account of the great kingdom of David and Solomon. The Traditional Theory The quest for the United Monarchy has been the most spectacular ven- ture of ‘classical‘ biblical archaeology. 2 The obvious place to begin the search was Jerusalem. Yet Jerusalem proved elusive: the nature of the site made it difficult to peel away the layers of later centuries and the Temple Mount has always been beyond the reach of archaeologists. The search was therefore diverted to other sites, primarily Megid- do, specifically mentioned in 1 Kings 9:15 as having been built by So- lomon. Starting over a century ago, Megiddo became the focus of the * This study was supported by the Chaim Katzman Archaeology Fund and the Jacob M.
    [Show full text]
  • Hwang2011.Pdf
    The Hope for the Restoration of the Davidic Kingdom in the Light of the Davidic Covenant in Chronicles Sunwoo Hwang Doctor of Philosophy The University of Edinburgh 2011 I dedicate this thesis to my sister Sunah Hwang, who went to the presence of God in the midst of my writing this thesis. ii CONTENTS Acknowledgement vi Abbreviations vii I. Introduction 1 1. A Problem 1 2. Review of Previous Scholarship 6 2. 1. Nathan’s oracle 6 2. 2. Solomon’s prayer 10 2. 3. Abijah’s speech 11 2. 4. Other disputed passages 12 2. 5. Terminology 15 3. Methodology 16 II. The Davidic Covenant in 1 Chr 17:1-27 19 1. Setting 19 2. Synoptic Comparison 19 2. 1. 2 Sam 7:6//1 Chr 17:5 19 2. 2. 2 Sam 7:12//1 Chr 17:11 27 2. 3. 2 Sam 7:14-15//1 Chr 17:13 34 2. 4. 2 Sam 7:16//1 Chr 17:14 43 2. 5. 2 Sam 7:20//1 Chr 17:18 54 3. Further Issues 55 3. 1. Ideology for the revival of the Davidic dynasty 55 3. 1. 1. ~lw[ 55 3. 1. 2. The Davidic kingdom as YHWH’s kingdom 62 3. 1. 3. The Davidic covenant in David’s prayer 65 3. 1. 4. Eschatological reading of the Davidic covenant 66 3. 1. 5. The Chronicler’s faithful retention of the Davidic covenant in 1 Chronicles 17 72 3. 2. Ideology against the revival of the Davidic dynasty 73 3. 2. 1. Solomon, not David as the protagonist of the Chronicler 73 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 150415-The-Jewish-Messiah.Pdf
    Wed 15 Apr 2015 / 26 Nissan 5775 B”H Dr Maurice M. Mizrahi Congregation Adat Reyim Adult Education The Jewish Messiah .( ָמ ִׁשי חַ ,We Jews are waiting for the Messiah (Mashiach -Means “The Anointed One”. -Kings were anointed with oil when they began their reign. Many contenders arose over the centuries, but rabbis disqualified them. What exactly are the job requirements? What are we expecting? What will happen after he arrives? Maybe YOU qualify! Biblical references Torah: And Balaam [the Gentile prophet] said to [King] Balak [who told him to curse the Jews]:... [I] heard the words of God, and know the knowledge of the most High, [and] saw the vision of the Almighty... I shall see him, but not now. I shall behold him, but he is not near. A star shall shoot forth out of Jacob, and a scepter shall rise out of Israel. And it shall strike the corners of Moab, and destroy all the sons of Seth... And Israel shall do bravely. A ruler shall come out of Jacob... [Numbers 24:12-19] Note: A star shall shoot forth out of Jacob. [Numbers 24:17] Isaiah: For to us a child is born, to us a son is given; and the government is upon his shoulder. His name shall be “Wonderful Counselor of the Mighty God, of the Everlasting Father, of the Prince of Peace”. [His mission shall be] to increase government, establish unending peace upon the throne of David and upon his kingdom, and uphold it through justice and righteousness from that time forth and forevermore.
    [Show full text]