DOCSLIB.ORG

National Tracking Poll 210259

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Tracking Poll 210259 National Tracking Poll Project: 210259 N Size: 1984 Registered Voters Margin of Error: ± 2% Topline Report February 14-15, 2021 Question Response Frequency Percentage P1 Now, generally speaking, would you say that things in the country are going in the right direction, or have they pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track? Right Direction 931 47% Wrong Track 1053 53% nr2b Do you approve or disapprove of the job Joe Biden is doing as President? Strongly Approve 767 39% Somewhat Approve 457 23% Somewhat Disapprove 159 8% Strongly Disapprove 501 25% Don’t Know / No Opinion 100 5% nr2bNET Do you approve or disapprove of the job Joe Biden is doing as President? Total Approve 1224 62% Total Disapprove 660 33% Don’t Know / No Opinion 100 5% P3 Now, thinking about your vote, what would you say is the top set of issues on your mind when you cast your vote for federal offices such as U.S. Senate or Congress? Economic Issues – like taxes, wages, jobs, 773 39% unemployment, and spending Security Issues – like terrorism, foreign policy, and 181 9% border security Health Care Issues – like the 2010 health care law, 352 18% Medicaid, other challenges Seniors Issues – like Medicare and Social Security 289 15% Women’s Issues – like birth control, abortion, and equal 76 4% pay Education Issues – like school standards, class sizes, 82 4% school choice, and student loans Energy Issues – like carbon emissions, cost of 87 4% electricity/gasoline, or renewables Other: 145 7% Page | 1 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL1 If the 2024 Republican primary were being held today, for whom would you vote? (N=645) Donald Trump 342 53% Mike Pence 77 12% Marco Rubio 10 2% Mitt Romney 27 4% Nikki Haley 36 6% Ted Cruz 23 4% Josh Hawley 5 1% Tom Cotton 7 1% Tim Scott 3 1% Kristi Noem 6 1% Larry Hogan 5 1% Rick Scott 2 0% Donald Trump Jr. 40 6% Mike Pompeo 10 2% Someone else 17 3% Would not vote 34 5% POL2 Thinking about the Republican party today, would you say it’s going in the right direction, or has it pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track? Right direction 451 23% Wrong track 1254 63% Don’t know / No opinion 278 14% POL3 Thinking about the Democratic party today, would you say it’s going in the right direction, or has it pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track? Right direction 974 49% Wrong track 770 39% Don’t know / No opinion 240 12% POL4 Do you believe Donald Trump should play a major role in the Republican party, a minor role in the Republican party, or should he no longer play a role in the Republican Party? Play a major role in the Republican party 486 25% Play a minor role in the Republican party 194 10% No longer play a role in the Republican party 1068 54% Don’t know / No opinion 236 12% POL5 How much have you seen, read or heard about a mob of people attacking police and breaking into the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on January 6th 2021? A lot 1376 69% Some 457 23% Not much 102 5% Nothing at all 49 2% Page | 2 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL6_1NET Did you watch coverage of Donald Trump’s impeachment trial in the Senate that occurred the week of February 8th 2021? Yes, I watched some of it live Selected 867 44% Not Selected 1117 56% POL6_2NET Did you watch coverage of Donald Trump’s impeachment trial in the Senate that occurred the week of February 8th 2021? Yes, I watched news coverage of the trial Selected 462 23% Not Selected 1522 77% POL6_3NET Did you watch coverage of Donald Trump’s impeachment trial in the Senate that occurred the week of February 8th 2021? No, I did not watch coverage of the trial Selected 735 37% Not Selected 1249 63% POL7 And do you believe the people who broke into the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., as Congress was certifying Electoral College votes for President-elect Joe Biden are: Supporters of President Trump 1316 66% Opponents of President Trump 303 15% Don’t know / No opinion 365 18% POL8_1 How responsible do you believe each of the following are for the events that led to a group of people attacking police and breaking into the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.? Democrats in Congress Very responsible 318 16% Somewhat responsible 276 14% Not too responsible 256 13% Not responsible at all 887 45% Don’t know / No opinion 246 12% POL8_2 How responsible do you believe each of the following are for the events that led to a group of people attacking police and breaking into the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.? Republicans in Congress Very responsible 486 24% Somewhat responsible 553 28% Not too responsible 291 15% Not responsible at all 413 21% Don’t know / No opinion 241 12% Page | 3 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL8_3 How responsible do you believe each of the following are for the events that led to a group of people attacking police and breaking into the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.? Sen. Ted Cruz Very responsible 444 22% Somewhat responsible 345 17% Not too responsible 211 11% Not responsible at all 484 24% Don’t know / No opinion 501 25% POL8_4 How responsible do you believe each of the following are for the events that led to a group of people attacking police and breaking into the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.? Sen. Josh Hawley Very responsible 371 19% Somewhat responsible 261 13% Not too responsible 186 9% Not responsible at all 355 18% Don’t know / No opinion 812 41% POL8_5 How responsible do you believe each of the following are for the events that led to a group of people attacking police and breaking into the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.? Local law enforcement Very responsible 209 11% Somewhat responsible 461 23% Not too responsible 370 19% Not responsible at all 683 34% Don’t know / No opinion 261 13% POL8_6 How responsible do you believe each of the following are for the events that led to a group of people attacking police and breaking into the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.? Defense Department Very responsible 181 9% Somewhat responsible 319 16% Not too responsible 359 18% Not responsible at all 708 36% Don’t know / No opinion 417 21% POL8_7 How responsible do you believe each of the following are for the events that led to a group of people attacking police and breaking into the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.? Donald Trump Very responsible 1035 52% Somewhat responsible 235 12% Not too responsible 174 9% Not responsible at all 420 21% Don’t know / No opinion 121 6% Page | 4 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL8_8 How responsible do you believe each of the following are for the events that led to a group of people attacking police and breaking into the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.? Mike Pence Very responsible 168 8% Somewhat responsible 361 18% Not too responsible 398 20% Not responsible at all 757 38% Don’t know / No opinion 300 15% POL8_9 How responsible do you believe each of the following are for the events that led to a group of people attacking police and breaking into the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.? President Joe Biden Very responsible 255 13% Somewhat responsible 217 11% Not too responsible 154 8% Not responsible at all 1156 58% Don’t know / No opinion 201 10% POL8_10 How responsible do you believe each of the following are for the events that led to a group of people attacking police and breaking into the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.? The people who broke into the U.S. Capitol Very responsible 1569 79% Somewhat responsible 153 8% Not too responsible 48 2% Not responsible at all 96 5% Don’t know / No opinion 118 6% POL8_11 How responsible do you believe each of the following are for the events that led to a group of people attacking police and breaking into the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.? State elections officials Very responsible 216 11% Somewhat responsible 361 18% Not too responsible 325 16% Not responsible at all 690 35% Don’t know / No opinion 392 20% POL8_12 How responsible do you believe each of the following are for the events that led to a group of people attacking police and breaking into the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.? State legislators Very responsible 199 10% Somewhat responsible 423 21% Not too responsible 383 19% Not responsible at all 541 27% Don’t know / No opinion 437 22% Page | 5 Question Response Frequency Percentage POL8_13 How responsible do you believe each of the following are for the events that led to a group of people attacking police and breaking into the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.? News media Very responsible 444 22% Somewhat responsible 542 27% Not too responsible 331 17% Not responsible at all 436 22% Don’t know / No opinion 230 12% POL8_14 How responsible do you believe each of the following are for the events that led to a group of people attacking police and breaking into the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C.? Social media companies Very responsible 506 25% Somewhat responsible 658 33% Not too responsible 265 13% Not responsible at all 305 15% Don’t know / No opinion 250 13% POL9 Based on what you know, do you agree or disagree with the following statement:Members of Congress who were at the U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SSCI Senators to DHS Mayorkas Re
    MARK R. WARNER, VIRGINIA, CHAIRMAN MARCO RUBIO, FLORIDA, VICE CHAIRMAN DIANNE FEINSTEIN, CALIFORNIA RICHARD BURR, NORTH CAROLINA RON WYDEN, OREGON JAMES E. RISCH, IDAHO MARTIN HEINRICH, NEW MEXICO SUSAN M. COLLINS, MAINE ANGUS S. KING, JR., MAINE ROY BLUNT, MISSOURI MICHAEL F. BENNET, COLORADO TOM COTTON, ARKANSAS ROBERT P. CASEY, JR., PENNSYLVANIA JOHN CORNYN, TEXAS United States Senate KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND, NEW YORK BEN SASSE, NEBRASKA SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE CHARLES SCHUMER, NEW YORK, EX OFFICIO MITCH MCCONNELL, KENTUCKY, EX OFFICIO WASHINGTON, DC 20510–6475 JACK REED, RHODE ISLAND, EX OFFICIO JAMES M. INHOFE, OKLAHOMA, EX OFFICIO MICHAEL CASEY, STAFF DIRECTOR BRIAN W. WALSH, MINORITY STAFF DIRECTOR KELSEY S. BAILEY, CHIEF CLERK March 16, 2021 The Honorable Alejandro Mayorkas Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security Washington, D.C. 20528 Dear Secretary Mayorkas: We write to draw your attention to the “Report on DHS Administrative Review into I&A Open Source Collection and Dissemination Activities During Civil Unrest; Portland, Oregon, June through July 2020,” produced on January 6, 2021, by the Office of the General Counsel of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The report raises serious concerns about the Department’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) which require a response from Department leadership. The report details a series of problems related to the legality of I&A operations, I&A’s relationships with other federal as well as state and local authorities, the allocation of resources and personnel, management and the internal climate at I&A, and accountability. We request that the Department provide the Congress an explanation of how it will address each of these issues, the extent to which the Department accepts and intends to implement the recommendations included in the report, and any additional reforms the Department may support.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Committees 2021
    Key Committees 2021 Senate Committee on Appropriations Visit: appropriations.senate.gov Majority Members Minority Members Patrick J. Leahy, VT, Chairman Richard C. Shelby, AL, Ranking Member* Patty Murray, WA* Mitch McConnell, KY Dianne Feinstein, CA Susan M. Collins, ME Richard J. Durbin, IL* Lisa Murkowski, AK Jack Reed, RI* Lindsey Graham, SC* Jon Tester, MT Roy Blunt, MO* Jeanne Shaheen, NH* Jerry Moran, KS* Jeff Merkley, OR* John Hoeven, ND Christopher Coons, DE John Boozman, AR Brian Schatz, HI* Shelley Moore Capito, WV* Tammy Baldwin, WI* John Kennedy, LA* Christopher Murphy, CT* Cindy Hyde-Smith, MS* Joe Manchin, WV* Mike Braun, IN Chris Van Hollen, MD Bill Hagerty, TN Martin Heinrich, NM Marco Rubio, FL* * Indicates member of Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies Subcommittee, which funds IMLS - Final committee membership rosters may still be being set “Key Committees 2021” - continued: Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Visit: help.senate.gov Majority Members Minority Members Patty Murray, WA, Chairman Richard Burr, NC, Ranking Member Bernie Sanders, VT Rand Paul, KY Robert P. Casey, Jr PA Susan Collins, ME Tammy Baldwin, WI Bill Cassidy, M.D. LA Christopher Murphy, CT Lisa Murkowski, AK Tim Kaine, VA Mike Braun, IN Margaret Wood Hassan, NH Roger Marshall, KS Tina Smith, MN Tim Scott, SC Jacky Rosen, NV Mitt Romney, UT Ben Ray Lujan, NM Tommy Tuberville, AL John Hickenlooper, CO Jerry Moran, KS “Key Committees 2021” - continued: Senate Committee on Finance Visit: finance.senate.gov Majority Members Minority Members Ron Wyden, OR, Chairman Mike Crapo, ID, Ranking Member Debbie Stabenow, MI Chuck Grassley, IA Maria Cantwell, WA John Cornyn, TX Robert Menendez, NJ John Thune, SD Thomas R.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Dream Is Not Dead: (But Populism Could Kill
    The American Dream Is Not Dead (But Populism Could Kill It) Michael R. Strain Arthur F. Burns Scholar in Political Economy Director of Economic Policy Studies American Enterprise Institute What do we mean by “the American Dream?” • The freedom to choose how to live your own life. • To have a “good life,” including a good family, meaningful work, a strong community, and a comfortable retirement. • To own a home. What do we mean by “the American Dream?” • A key part of the dream is based on economic success and upward mobility (loosely defined). 1. Are my kids going to be better off than I am? 2. Am I doing better this year than last year? 3. Can a poor kid grow up to become a billionaire or president? The national conversation assumes that American Dream is dead “Sadly, the American dream is dead.” — Donald Trump, June 2015 “There was once a path to a stable and prosperous life in America that has since closed off. It was a well-traveled path for many Americans: Graduate from high school and get a job, typically with a local manufacturer or one of the service industries associated with it, and earn enough to support a family. The idea was not only that it was possible to achieve this kind of success, but that anyone could achieve it—the American dream. That dream defines my family’s history, and its disappearance calls me to action today.” — Marco Rubio, December 2018 The national conversation assumes that American Dream is dead “Across generations, Americans shared the belief that hard work would bring opportunity and a better life.
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICAN P VERSIGHT
    AMERICAN p VERSIGHT January11,2021 VIA ONLINE PORTAL DouglasHibbard Chief,InitialRequestStaff OfficeofInform ationPolicy DepartmentofJustice 441GStNW,6thFloor Washington,DC20530 ViaOnlinePortal Re: Expedited Freedom of Information Act Request DearFOIAOfficer: PursuanttotheFreedomof InformationAct(FOIA),5U.S.C.§552,andthe implem entingregulationsof youragency,Am ericanOversightmakesthefollowing requestforrecords. OnJanuary6,2021,PresidentTrumpinciteda mtoob attackCongresswhile mbers em werecertifyingtheelectionforPresident-electJoeBiden. 1 Theapparent insurrectionistsattackedtheCapitolBuilding,forcedtheirwaypastreportedly understaffedCapitolPolice,andultim atelydelayedtheCongressionalsessionbyforcing lawmakersandtheirstaffstoflee. 2 Fourpeoplediedduringthisassaultandafifth person,aCapitolPoliceofficer,diedthefollowingdayfrominjuriesincurredwhile engagingwithrioters. 3 Whilem ilitia mbers em roamedthehallsofCongress,Trum preportedlyfoughtagainst deployingtheD.C.NationalGuard, 4 andtheDefenseDepartm entreportedlyinitially 1 PressRelease,OfficeofSen.MittRom ney,Rom neyCondemInsurrectionatU.S. ns Capitol, Jan.6,2021, https://www.romney.senate.gov/rom ney-condem ns-insurrection- us-capitol. 2 RebeccaTan,etal., TrumpSupportersStormU.S.Capitol,WithOneWomanKilledand TearGasFired, Wash.Post(Jan.7,2021,12:30AM), https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/trum p-supporters-storm -capitol- dc/2021/01/06/58afc0b8-504b-11eb-83e3-322644d82356 story.html. 3 EricLevenson, WhatWeKnowAboutthe5DeathsinthePro-TrumpMobthatStormedthe Capitol, CNN(Jan.8,2021,5:29PM),
    [Show full text]
  • Trump Holds up Ukraine Military Aid Meant to Confront Russia POLITICO
    12/14/19, 1052 PM Page 1 of 1 Pro-Russia separatist soldiers celebrate in Lugansk, Ukraine, in 2014. | Spencer Platt/Getty Images BUDGET & APPROPRIATIONS Trump holds up Ukraine military aid meant to confront Russia By CAITLIN EMMA and CONNOR O’BRIEN | 08/28/2019 06:11 PM EDT | Updated 08/29/2019 03:40 PM EDT The Trump administration is slow-walking $250 million in military assistance to Ukraine, annoying lawmakers and advocates who argue the funding is critical to keeping Russia at bay. President Donald Trump asked his national security team to review the funding program, known as the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, in order to ensure the money is being used in the best interest of the United States, a senior administration official told POLITICO on Wednesday. Story Continued Below AD But the delays come amid questions over Trump’s approach to Russia, after a weekend in which the president repeatedly seemed to downplay Moscow’s military intervention in Ukraine and pushed for Russia to be reinstated into the Group of Seven, an annual gathering of the world’s largest advanced economies. The review is also occurring amid a broader internal debate over whether to halt or cut billions of dollars in foreign aid. United States military aid to Ukraine has long been seen as a litmus test for how strongly the American government is pushing back against Moscow. The Trump administration in 2017 approved lethal arms sales to Ukraine, taking a step the Obama administration had never done. The move was seen as a sign that Trump’s government was taking a hard-line approach to a revanchist Vladimir Putin despite the president’s public rhetoric flattering the Russian leader.
    [Show full text]
  • CALENDAR of BUSINESS Wednesday, January 6, 2021
    SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS CONVENED JANUARY 3, 2021 FIRST SESSION ! " DAYS OF SESSION 2 SECOND SESSION ! " CALENDAR OF BUSINESS Wednesday, January 6, 2021 SENATE CONVENES AT 12:30 P.M. PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF JULIE E. ADAMS, SECRETARY OF THE SENATE By JOHN J. MERLINO, LEGISLATIVE CLERK www.SenateCalendar.gov 19–015 2 UNANIMOUS CONSENT AGREEMENTS 3 SSS2021 SSS JANUARY JULY Sun M Tu W Th F Sat Sun M Tu W Th F Sat 1 2 1 2 3 3 4 5 —–6 7 8 9 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 31 FEBRUARY AUGUST 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 28 29 30 31 MARCH SEPTEMBER 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 28 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30 APRIL OCTOBER 1 2 3 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 29 30 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 MAY NOVEMBER 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 28 29 30 30 31 JUNE DECEMBER 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 28 29 30 26 27 28 29 30 31 JANUARY Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Days Senate met during First Session, One Hundred Seventeenth Congress, are marked (—–).
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet: Senator Marco Rubio’S Republican Address to the Nation
    FACT SHEET: SENATOR MARCO RUBIO’S REPUBLICAN ADDRESS TO THE NATION Rubio: “Economic growth is the best way to help the middle class. … I hope the President will abandon his obsession with raising taxes and instead work with us to achieve real growth in our economy.” RUBIO: LIMITED GOVERNMENT & FREE ENTERPRISE – NOT BIG GOVERNMENT – WILL STRENGTHEN AMERICA’S MIDDLE CLASS Rubio: “Presidents in both parties – from John F. Kennedy to Ronald Reagan – have known that our free enterprise economy is the source of our middle class prosperity. Enacted After His Death, Kennedy’s Tax Relief Cut The Top Marginal Rate To 70% From 91%. The Economy Grew 5.5%, Unemployment Dropped To 3.8% & The Annual Deficit Shrank From $7 Billion To $1 Billion. Rubio: “This idea – that our problems were caused by a government that was too small – it’s just not true. In fact, a major cause of our recent downturn was a housing crisis created by reckless government policies.” Forbes: “There is very little doubt that the underlying cause of the current credit crisis was a housing bubble. But the collapse of the bubble would not have led to a worldwide recession and credit crisis if almost 40% of all U.S. mortgages--25 million loans--were not of the low quality known as subprime or Alt-A. These loans were made to borrowers with blemished credit, or involved low or no down payments, negative amortization and limited documentation of income. The loans’ unprecedentedly high rates of default are what is driving down housing prices and weakening the financial system.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcconnell Announces Senate Republican Committee Assignments for the 117Th Congress
    For Immediate Release, Wednesday, February 3, 2021 Contacts: David Popp, Doug Andres Robert Steurer, Stephanie Penn McConnell Announces Senate Republican Committee Assignments for the 117th Congress Praises Senators Crapo and Tim Scott for their work on the Committee on Committees WASHINGTON, D.C. – Following the 50-50 power-sharing agreement finalized earlier today, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) announced the Senate Republican Conference Committee Assignments for the 117th Congress. Leader McConnell once again selected Senator Mike Crapo (R-ID) to chair the Senate Republicans’ Committee on Committees, the panel responsible for committee assignments for the 117th Congress. This is the ninth consecutive Congress in which Senate leadership has asked Crapo to lead this important task among Senate Republicans. Senator Tim Scott (R-SC) assisted in the committee selection process as he did in the previous three Congresses. “I want to thank Mike and Tim for their work. They have both earned the trust of our colleagues in the Republican Conference by effectively leading these important negotiations in years past and this year was no different. Their trust and experience was especially important as we enter a power-sharing agreement with Democrats and prepare for equal representation on committees,” McConnell said. “I am very grateful for their work.” “I appreciate Leader McConnell’s continued trust in having me lead the important work of the Committee on Committees,” said Senator Crapo. “Americans elected an evenly-split Senate, and working together to achieve policy solutions will be critical in continuing to advance meaningful legislation impacting all Americans. Before the COVID-19 pandemic hit our nation, our economy was the strongest it has ever been.
    [Show full text]
  • The Senate in Transition Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Nuclear Option1
    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NYL\19-4\NYL402.txt unknown Seq: 1 3-JAN-17 6:55 THE SENATE IN TRANSITION OR HOW I LEARNED TO STOP WORRYING AND LOVE THE NUCLEAR OPTION1 William G. Dauster* The right of United States Senators to debate without limit—and thus to filibuster—has characterized much of the Senate’s history. The Reid Pre- cedent, Majority Leader Harry Reid’s November 21, 2013, change to a sim- ple majority to confirm nominations—sometimes called the “nuclear option”—dramatically altered that right. This article considers the Senate’s right to debate, Senators’ increasing abuse of the filibuster, how Senator Reid executed his change, and possible expansions of the Reid Precedent. INTRODUCTION .............................................. 632 R I. THE NATURE OF THE SENATE ........................ 633 R II. THE FOUNDERS’ SENATE ............................. 637 R III. THE CLOTURE RULE ................................. 639 R IV. FILIBUSTER ABUSE .................................. 641 R V. THE REID PRECEDENT ............................... 645 R VI. CHANGING PROCEDURE THROUGH PRECEDENT ......... 649 R VII. THE CONSTITUTIONAL OPTION ........................ 656 R VIII. POSSIBLE REACTIONS TO THE REID PRECEDENT ........ 658 R A. Republican Reaction ............................ 659 R B. Legislation ...................................... 661 R C. Supreme Court Nominations ..................... 670 R D. Discharging Committees of Nominations ......... 672 R E. Overruling Home-State Senators ................. 674 R F. Overruling the Minority Leader .................. 677 R G. Time To Debate ................................ 680 R CONCLUSION................................................ 680 R * Former Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy for U.S. Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid. The author has worked on U.S. Senate and White House staffs since 1986, including as Staff Director or Deputy Staff Director for the Committees on the Budget, Labor and Human Resources, and Finance.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump the Ultimate INGOP Wildcard
    V21, N25 Friday, March 4, 2016 Trump the ultimate INGOP wildcard could go wrong A few Hoosier with that?), prepar- ing to nominate a Republicans express billionaire dema- alarm, but party is gogue who has insulted everyone mostly mute from the Holy See to disabled citizens. By BRIAN A. HOWEY The only entities BLOOMINGTON – We have not feeling the entered the era of Trumpian Indi- Teflon howitzers ana. It is one filled with mystery and are Jesus Christ, vacuum. It is one that is releasing Mohammed and demons. With Donald Trump well God, and they positioned for may be next. For the Republican Democrats rejoic- presidential ing at the idea that nomination, Hillary Clinton will fueled by about Andrean HS students holding a Donald Trump cutout chanted “build a “cream” Trump, as 35% of the wall” at Latino Bishop Noll students last weekend. (NWI Times Photo) suggested by the Republican wobbly prognosti- electorate in about 15 states, Americans and Hoosiers are cators Karl Rove and Bill Kristol, the sobering dynamic is facing an unprecedented November election with the likely that the U.S. may be one terror assault away from a Presi- nominees possessing historically high negatives. dent Trump, whose candidacy rocketed past the punditry Any historic templates are now obsolete. following the Paris and San Bernardino attacks. ISIS seeks On the Republican side, the Trump phenomenon is Continued on page 4 being propelled by the uneducated and uninformed (what Lt. Gov. Holcomb ascends By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – Sooooo, have you been to the Berry Bowl? Eric Holcomb responded, “Yes.” The Wigwam? TigArena? Northside Gym? Holcomb, then a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Resolution
    CONFERENCE RESOLUTION Resolved, that the following shall be the rules of the House Republican Conference for the 115th Congress: Rule 1—Conference Membership (a) Inclusion.—All Republican Members of the House of Representatives (including Delegates and the Resident Commissioner) and other Members of the House as determined by the Republican Conference of the House of Representatives (“the Conference”) shall be Members of the Conference. (b) Expulsion.—A ⅔ vote of the entire membership shall be necessary to expel a Member of the Conference. Proceedings for expulsion shall follow the rules of the House of Representatives, as nearly as practicable. Rule 2—Republican Leadership (a) Elected Leadership.—The Elected Republican Leaders of the House of Representatives are— (1) the Speaker; (2) the Republican Leader; (3) the Republican Whip; (4) the Chair of the Republican Conference; (5) the Chair of the National Republican Congressional Committee; (6) the Chair of the Committee on Policy; (7) the Vice-Chair of the Republican Conference; and, (8) the Secretary of the Republican Conference. (b) Designated Leadership.—The designated Republican Leaders of the House of Representatives are— (1) the Chair of the House Committee on Rules; (2) the Chair of the House Committee on Ways and Means; (3) the Chair of the House Committee on Appropriations; (4) the Chair of the House Committee on the Budget; (5) the Chair of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce; (6) the Chief Deputy Whip; (7) one member of the sophomore class elected by the sophomore class; and, (8) one member of the freshman class elected by the freshman class. (c) Leadership Issues.—The Republican Leader may designate certain issues as “Leadership Issues.” Those issues will require early and ongoing cooperation between the relevant committees and the Leadership as those issues evolve.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Version of the Newsletter
    Monthly Legislative Newsletter June 2021 President Biden’s 2021 Budget On May 28, 2021, President Biden released his Fiscal Year 2022 Budget. The budget, which is largely a messaging document, included a number of investments related to public health. Additionally, the foundations of the President’s budget are both the American Jobs Plan and the American Families Plan, which are both pieces of legislation that President Biden introduced in order to get America back on track as the tide turns on the pandemic. President Biden’s budget includes: • Extending the expanded health insurance tax credits that were included in the American Rescue Plan o These credits lower premiums by an average of $50 per person and making them permanent will allow upwards of 4 million uninsured people to get coverage • $131.7 billion for HHS o $25 billion increase from Fiscal Year 2021 • A total of $51 billion for NIH o $9 billion increase from Fiscal Year 2021 • Launches the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H) o The budget provides $6.5 billion to launch ARPA-H o Will initially focus on research and development spending on cancer and other diseases such as diabetes and Alzheimer’s o Goal would be to speed up health breakthroughs • $7.6 billion for NCI o Includes $50 million for the Childhood Cancer Data Initiative as well as Cancer Moonshot funding • $8.7 billion in discretionary funding for CDC in order to better prepare for the next pandemic You can view the full fact sheet HERE. What Does the Biden Budget Mean for Congress? While the President’s budget is largely a messaging document, its release officially kicks the congressional appropriations process into high gear.
    [Show full text]