Lectures on Cremona Transformations, Ann Arbor-Rome, 2010/2011

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lectures on Cremona Transformations, Ann Arbor-Rome, 2010/2011 Lectures on Cremona transformations, Ann Arbor-Rome, 2010/2011 Igor Dolgachev July 4, 2016 ii Contents 1 Basic properties1 1.1 Generalities about rational maps and linear systems........1 1.2 Resolution of a rational map....................3 1.3 The base ideal of a Cremona transformation............5 1.4 The graph of a Cremona transformation.............. 10 1.5 F -locus and P -locus........................ 13 2 Intersection Theory 19 2.1 The Segre class........................... 19 2.2 Self-intersection of exceptional divisors.............. 25 2.3 Computation of the multi-degree.................. 31 2.4 Homaloidal linear systems in the plane............... 33 2.5 Smooth homaloidal linear systems................. 35 2.6 Special Cremona transformations.................. 40 2.7 Double structures.......................... 42 2.8 Dilated transformations....................... 49 3 First examples 53 3.1 Quadro-quadric transformations.................. 53 3.2 Quadro-quartic transformations................... 56 3.3 Quadro-cubic transformations................... 58 3.4 Bilinear Cremona transformations................. 59 3.5 Monomial birational maps..................... 71 4 Involutions 73 4.1 De Jonquieres` involutions...................... 73 4.2 Planar Cremona involutions..................... 78 4.3 De Jonquieres` subgroups...................... 80 4.4 Linear systems of isologues..................... 81 iii iv CONTENTS 4.5 Arguesian involutions........................ 83 3 4.6 Geiser and Bertini involutions in P ................ 91 5 Factorization Problem 95 5.1 Elementary links.......................... 95 5.2 Noether-Fano-Iskovskikh inequality................ 108 5.3 The untwisting algorithm...................... 115 5.4 Noether Theorem.......................... 116 5.5 Hilda Hudson’s Theorem...................... 120 Lecture 1 Basic properties 1.1 Generalities about rational maps and linear systems Recall that a rational map f : X 99K Y of algebraic varieties over a field K is a regular map defined on a dense open Zariski subset U ⊂ X. The largest such set to which f can be extended as a regular map is denoted by dom(f). Two rational maps are considered to be equivalent if their restrictions to an open dense subset coincide. A rational map is called dominant if f : dom(f) ! Y is a dominant regular map, i.e. the image is dense in Y . Algebraic varieties form a category RatK with morphisms taken to be equivalence classes of dominant rational maps. From now on we restrict ourselves with rational maps of irreducible varieties over C. We use fd to denote the restriction of f to dom(f), or to any open subset of dom(f). A dominant map fd : dom(X) ! Y defines a homomorphism of the fields of rational functions f ∗ : R(Y ) ! R(X). Conversely, any homomorphism ∗ R(Y ) ! R(X) arises from a unique dominant rational map X 99K Y . If f makes R(X) a finite extension of R(Y ), then the degree of the extension is the degree of f. A rational map of degree 1 is called a birational map. It is also can be defined as an invertible rational map. We will further assume that X is a smooth projective variety. It follows that the complement of dom(f) is of codimension ≥ 2. A rational map f : X 99K r Y is defined by a linear system. Namely, we embed Y in a projective space P 0 and consider the complete linear system HY = jOY (1) := jH (Y; OY (1))j. Its ∗ divisors are hyperplane sections of Y . The invertible sheaf fd OY (1) on dom(f) can be extended to a unique invertible sheaf L on all of X. Also we can extend the ∗ 0 sections fd (s); s 2 V ; to sections of L on all of X. The obtained homomorphism ∗ 0 0 0 f : V = H (Y; OY (1)) ! H (X; L) is injective and its image is a linear subspace V ⊂ H0(X; L). The associated projective space jV j ⊂ jLj is the linear 1 2 LECTURE 1. BASIC PROPERTIES r system HX defining a morphism fd : dom(f) ! Y,! P . The rational map f is given in the usual way. Evaluating sections of V at a point, we get a map dom(f) ! jV _j, and by restriction, the map dom(f) ! jV 0_j which factors through Y,! jV 0_j. A choice of a basis in V and a basis in V 0 r defines a rational map f : X 99K Y ⊂ P , where r = dim jHY j. For any rational map f : X 99K Y and any closed reduced subvariety Z of −1 −1 Y we denote by f (Z) the closure of fd (Z) in X. It is called the inverse transform of Z under the rational map f. Thus the divisors from HX are inverse r transforms of hyperplane sections Z of Y in the embedding ι : Y,! P such that Z \ f(dom(f)) 6= ;. If jV 0j ⊂ jL0j is a linear system on Y , then we define its inverse transform f −1(jV 0j) of jV 0j following the procedure from above defining the linear sys- −1 0 tem HX . The members of f (jV j) are the inverse transforms of members of jV 0j. When f is a morphism, the inverse transform is equal to the full transform f ∗(jV j) ⊂ jf ∗L0j. Let L be a line bundle and V ⊂ H0(X; L). Consider the natural evaluation map of sheaves ev : V ⊗ OX !L defined by restricting global sections to stalks of L. It is equivalent to a map −1 ev : V ⊗ L !OX whose image is a sheaf of ideals in OX . This sheaf of ideals is denoted b(jV j) and is called the base ideal of the linear system jV j. The closed subscheme Bs(HX ) of X defined by this ideal is called the base locus scheme of jV j. We have Bs(jV j) = \D2HX D = D0 \ ::: \ Dr (scheme-theoretically); where D0;:::;Dr are the divisors of sections forming a basis of V . The largest positive divisor F contained in all divisors from jV j (equivalently, in the divisors D0;:::;Dr) is called the fixed component of jV j. The linear system without fixed component is sometimes called irreducible. Each irreducible component of its base scheme is of codimension ≥ 2. If F = div(s0) for some s0 2 OX (F ), then the multiplication by s0 defines an injective map L(−F ) !L and the linear map H0(X; L(−F )) ! H0(X; L) defines an isomorphism from a subspace V 0 of H0(X; L(−F )) onto V . The linear 0 0 0_ system jV j ⊂ jL(−F )j is irreducible and defines a rational map f : X 99K jV j equal to the composition of f with the transpose isomorphism jV _j ! jV 0_j. The linear system is called basepoint-free, or simply free if its base scheme is ∼ empty, i.e. b(jV j) = OX . The proper transform of such a system under a rational 1.2. RESOLUTION OF A RATIONAL MAP 3 map is an irreducible linear system. In particular, the linear system HX defining a rational map X 99K Y as described in above, is always irreducible. The morphism _ U = X n Bs(HX ) ! jV j defined by the linear system jV j is the projection −1 ∼ ∼ _ _ Proj Sym(V ⊗ (LjU) ) = Proj Sym(V ⊗ OU ) = U × jV j ! jV j: If jV j is an irreducible linear system, dom(f) = X n Bs(HX )red = X n Supp(Bs(HX )): Let f : X 99K Y be a rational map defined by the inverse transform HX = jV j of a very ample complete linear system HY on Y . After choosing a basis in 0 r H (Y; OY (1)) and a basis (s0; : : : ; sr) in V , the map f : dom(f) ! Y,! P is given by the formula x 7! [s0(x); : : : ; sr(x)]: By definition, this is the formula defining the rational map f : X 99K Y . Of r course, different embeddings Y,! P define different formulas. Here are some simple properties of the base locus scheme. (i) jV j ⊂ jL ⊗ b(jV j)j := jH0(X; b(jV j) ⊗ L)j. (ii) Let φ : X0 ! X be a regular map, and V 0 = φ∗(V ) ⊂ H0(X0; φ∗L). Then −1 −1 φ (b(jV j)) = b(f (jV j)). Recall that, for any ideal sheaf a ⊂ OX , its −1 ∗ 0 inverse image φ (a) is defined to be the image of φ (a) = a ⊗OX OX in OX0 under the canonical multiplication map. (iii) If b(jV j) is an invertible ideal (i.e. isomorphic to OX (−F ) for some effec- tive divisor F ), then dom(f) = X and f is defined by the linear system jL(−F )j. (iv) If dom(f) = X, then b(jV j) is an invertible sheaf and Bs(HX ) = ;. 1.2 Resolution of a rational map Definition 1.2.1. A resolution of a rational map f : X 99K Y of projective vari- eties is a pair of regular projective morphisms π : X0 ! X and σ : X0 ! Y such −1 that f = σ ◦ π (in RatK) and π is an isomorphism over dom(f). 4 LECTURE 1. BASIC PROPERTIES X0 π σ ~ f X / Y We say that a resolution is smooth (normal) if X0 is smooth (normal). Let Z = V (a) be the closed subscheme defined by a and 1 M k σ : BlZ X = Proj a ! X k=0 be the blow-up of Z (see [Hartshorne]). We will also use the notation Bl(a) for −1 the blow up of V (a). The invertible sheaf σ (a) is isomorphic to OBlZ X (−E), where E is the uniquely defined effective divisor on BlZ X. We call E the excep- tional divisor of σ. Any birational morphism u : X0 ! X such that u−1(a) is an invertible sheaf of ideals factors through the blow-up of a.
Recommended publications
  • Intersection Theory
    William Fulton Intersection Theory Second Edition Springer Contents Introduction. Chapter 1. Rational Equivalence 6 Summary 6 1.1 Notation and Conventions 6 .2 Orders of Zeros and Poles 8 .3 Cycles and Rational Equivalence 10 .4 Push-forward of Cycles 11 .5 Cycles of Subschemes 15 .6 Alternate Definition of Rational Equivalence 15 .7 Flat Pull-back of Cycles 18 .8 An Exact Sequence 21 1.9 Affine Bundles 22 1.10 Exterior Products 24 Notes and References 25 Chapter 2. Divisors 28 Summary 28 2.1 Cartier Divisors and Weil Divisors 29 2.2 Line Bundles and Pseudo-divisors 31 2.3 Intersecting with Divisors • . 33 2.4 Commutativity of Intersection Classes 35 2.5 Chern Class of a Line Bundle 41 2.6 Gysin Map for Divisors 43 Notes and References 45 Chapter 3. Vector Bundles and Chern Classes 47 Summary 47 3.1 Segre Classes of Vector Bundles 47 3.2 Chern Classes . ' 50 • 3.3 Rational Equivalence on Bundles 64 Notes and References 68 Chapter 4. Cones and Segre Classes 70 Summary . 70 . 4.1 Segre Class of a Cone . 70 X Contents 4.2 Segre Class of a Subscheme 73 4.3 Multiplicity Along a Subvariety 79 4.4 Linear Systems 82 Notes and References 85 Chapter 5. Deformation to the Normal Cone 86 Summary 86 5.1 The Deformation 86 5.2 Specialization to the Normal Cone 89 Notes and References 90 Chapter 6. Intersection Products 92 Summary 92 6.1 The Basic Construction 93 6.2 Refined Gysin Homomorphisms 97 6.3 Excess Intersection Formula 102 6.4 Commutativity 106 6.5 Functoriality 108 6.6 Local Complete Intersection Morphisms 112 6.7 Monoidal Transforms 114 Notes and References 117 Chapter 7.
    [Show full text]
  • A Method to Compute Segre Classes of Subschemes of Projective Space D
    A method to compute Segre classes of subschemes of projective space D. Eklund, C. Jost and C. Peterson REPORT No. 47, 2010/2011, spring ISSN 1103-467X ISRN IML-R- -47-10/11- -SE+spring A METHOD TO COMPUTE SEGRE CLASSES OF SUBSCHEMES OF PROJECTIVE SPACE DAVID EKLUND, CHRISTINE JOST, AND CHRIS PETERSON Abstract. We present a method to compute the degrees of the Segre classes of a subscheme of complex projective space. The method is based on generic residuation and intersection theory. We provide a symbolic implementation using the software system Macaulay2 and a numerical implementation using the software package Bertini. 1. Introduction Segre classes are generalizations of characteristic classes of vector bundles and they occur frequently in intersection theory. Many problems in enumerative geome- try may be solved by computing the Segre classes of an algebraic scheme. Given an n-dimensional subscheme Z of complex projective space there are n+1 Segre classes of Z. The ith Segre class is a rational equivalence class of codimension i cycles on Z. Thus a Segre class may be represented as a weighted sum of irreducible subvarieties V1,...,Vm of Z. The degree of a Segre class is the corresponding weighted sum of the degrees of the projective varieties V1,...,Vm. In this paper we present a method to compute the degrees of the Segre classes of Z, given an ideal defining Z. The procedure is based on the intersection theory of Fulton and MacPherson. More specifically, we prove a B´ezout like theorem that involves the Segre classes of Z and a residual scheme to Z.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Methods in Intersection Theory and Combinatorial Algebraic Geometry Corey S
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2017 Effective Methods in Intersection Theory and Combinatorial Algebraic Geometry Corey S. (Corey Scott) Harris Follow this and additional works at the DigiNole: FSU's Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES EFFECTIVE METHODS IN INTERSECTION THEORY AND COMBINATORIAL ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY By COREY S. HARRIS A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Mathematics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2017 Copyright c 2017 Corey S. Harris. All Rights Reserved. Corey S. Harris defended this dissertation on April 7, 2017. The members of the supervisory committee were: Paolo Aluffi Professor Directing Dissertation Eric Chicken University Representative Ettore Aldrovandi Committee Member Kyounghee Kim Committee Member Kathleen Petersen Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank my advisor, Professor Paolo Aluffi. Even from my first year as a graduate student I was overwhelmed by his patience and generosity, and he has continued to prove himself an exceptional mentor. His guidance throughout the years has been absolutely vital. I always enjoy our meetings and will miss them when I leave. I cannot express enough my immense gratitude. I feel very lucky to have had him as an advisor. I would also like to thank Professor Ettore Aldrovandi, Professor Kyounghee Kim, and Professor Kathleen Petersen. Their support throughout the writing of this dissertation is greatly appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • Singularities of Logarithmic Foliations
    Compositio Math. 142 (2006) 131–142 doi:10.1112/S0010437X05001545 Singularities of logarithmic foliations Fernando Cukierman, Marcio G. Soares and Israel Vainsencher Abstract A logarithmic 1-form on CPn canbewrittenas m m dFi ω = Fj λi = λ0F0 dF0 + ···+ λmFm dFm 0 0 Fi m with Fi =( 0 Fj)/Fi for some homogeneous polynomials Fi of degree di and constants λi ∈ C such that λidi = 0. For general Fi,λi, the singularities of ω consist of a schematic union of the codimension 2 subvarieties Fi = Fj = 0 together with, possibly, finitely many isolated points. This is the case when all Fi are smooth and in general position. In this situation, we give a formula which prescribes the number of isolated singularities. 1. Introduction and statement of result The search for numerical invariants attached to algebraic foliations goes back to Poincar´e[Poi91]. He was interested in determining bounds for the degree of curves left invariant by a polynomial vector field on C2. Recent work has treated the question by establishing relations for the number of singularities of the foliation and certain Chern numbers and then using positivity of certain bundles. For a survey of recent results, see [Bru00, CL91, Est02, Soa00]. A foliation of dimension r on a smooth variety X of dimension n is a coherent subsheaf F of the tangent sheaf TX of generic rank r, locally split in codimension 2. 1 If r = n − 1 (codimension one foliations), the foliation corresponds to a global section of ΩX ⊗L for some line bundle L. n Suppose X = CP , with homogeneous coordinates x0,...,xn.
    [Show full text]
  • Topics in Algebraic Geometry II. Rationality of Algebraic Varieties
    Math 732: Topics in Algebraic Geometry II Rationality of Algebraic Varieties Mircea Mustat¸˘a∗ Winter 2017 Course Description A fundamental problem in algebraic geometry is to determine which varieties are rational, that is, birational to the projective space. Several important developments in the field have been motivated by this question. The main goal of the course is to describe two recent directions of study in this area. One approach goes back to Iskovskikh and Manin, who proved that smooth, 3-dimensional quartic hypersurfaces are not rational. This relies on ideas and methods from higher-dimensional birational geometry. The second approach, based on recent work of Claire Voisin and many other people, relies on a systematic use of decomposition of the diagonal and invariants such as Chow groups, Brauer groups, etc. to prove irrationality. Both directions will give us motivation to introduce and discuss some important concepts and results in algebraic geometry. The following is a rough outline of the course: Introduction 1. Rationality in dimension 2 (Castelnuovo's criterion). Part I 2. Introduction to Chow groups and intersection theory. 3. Decomposition of the diagonal and non-stable-rationality. 4. Examples of classes on non-stably-rational varieties. Part II 5. Introduction to singularities of pairs and vanishing theorems. 6. Birational rigidity of Fano hypersurfaces of index 1. Mircea Mustat¸˘a'sown lecture notes are available at: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mmustata/lectures_rationality.html Contents 1 January 5 5 1.1 The L¨urothproblem and its solution for curves..........................5 1.2 Birational invariance of plurigenera.................................7 2 January 10 9 2.1 Birational invariance of plurigenera (continued)..........................9 2.2 Other properties close to rationality...............................
    [Show full text]
  • CHERN CLASSES for SINGULAR HYPERSURFACES 0. Introduction
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 351, Number 10, Pages 3989{4026 S 0002-9947(99)02256-4 Article electronically published on February 8, 1999 CHERN CLASSES FOR SINGULAR HYPERSURFACES PAOLO ALUFFI Abstract. We prove a formula expressing the Chern-Schwartz-MacPherson class of a hypersurface in a nonsingular variety as a variation on another def- inition of the homology Chern class of singular varieties, introduced by W. Fulton; and we discuss the relation between these classes and others, such as Mather's Chern class and the µ-class we introduced in previous work. 0. Introduction There are several candidates for a notion of homology ‘Chern class’ of a (possibly singular) algebraic variety X, agreeing with the class obtained as dual of the total Chern class of the tangent bundle of X if X is nonsingular. One such notion was introduced by R. MacPherson [MacPherson], agreeing (as it was later understood) with a class introduced earlier by M.–H. Schwartz, and enjoying good functorial properties. A different class was defined by W. Fulton ([Fulton], 4.2.6), in a different and somewhat more general setting. The main purpose of this paper is to prove a precise relation between the Schwartz-MacPherson and the Fulton class of a hypersurface X of a nonsingular variety. We denote these two classes by cSM(X), cF (X) respectively. A summary of the context and essential definitions is given in 1, where we present several different statements of the result. The version which expresses§ most directly the link between the two classes mentioned above goes as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • Algorithms to Compute Characteristic Classes
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 6-25-2015 12:00 AM Algorithms to Compute Characteristic Classes Martin Helmer The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Eric Schost The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Applied Mathematics A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © Martin Helmer 2015 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Algebra Commons, Algebraic Geometry Commons, Geometry and Topology Commons, Other Applied Mathematics Commons, and the Theory and Algorithms Commons Recommended Citation Helmer, Martin, "Algorithms to Compute Characteristic Classes" (2015). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 2923. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/2923 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Algorithms to Compute Characteristic Classes (Thesis Format: Integrated-Article) by Martin Helmer Graduate Program in Applied Mathematics A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Doctor of Philosophy The School of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada c Martin Helmer 2015 i Abstract In this thesis we develop several new algorithms to compute characteristic classes in a variety of settings. In addition to algorithms for the computation of the Euler characteristic, a classical topological invariant, we also give algorithms to compute the Segre class and Chern-Schwartz-MacPherson (cSM) class. These invariants can in turn be used to compute other common invariants such as the Chern-Fulton class (or the Chern class in smooth cases).
    [Show full text]
  • Tensored Segre Classes
    TENSORED SEGRE CLASSES PAOLO ALUFFI Abstract. We study a class obtained from the Segre class s(Z; Y ) of an embedding of schemes by incorporating the datum of a line bundle on Z. This class satisfies basic properties analogous to the ordinary Segre class, but leads to remarkably simple formulas in standard intersection-theoretic situations such as excess or residual intersections. We prove a formula for the behavior of this class under linear joins, and use this formula to prove that a `Segre zeta function' associated with ideals generated by forms of the same degree is a rational function. 1. Introduction Segre classes of subschemes are fundamental ingredients in Fulton-MacPherson intersec- tion theory: the very definition of intersection product may be given as a component of a class obtained by capping a Segre class by the Chern class of a bundle determined by the data ([Ful84, Proposition 6.1(a)]). Segre classes also have applications in the theory of characteristic classes of singular varieties: both the Chern-Mather and the Chern-Schwartz- MacPherson class of a hypersurface of a nonsingular variety may be written in terms of Segre classes determined by the singularity subscheme of the hypersurface ([AB03, Propo- sition 2.2]). Precisely because they carry so much information, Segre classes are as a rule very challenging to compute, and their manipulation often leads to overly complex formulas. The main goal of this note is to study a variation on the definition of Segre class which produces a class with essentially the same amount of information, but enjoying features that may simplify its computation and often leads to much simpler expressions.
    [Show full text]
  • Singularities of Logarithmic Foliations
    Compositio Math. 142 (2006) 131–142 doi:10.1112/S0010437X05001545 Singularities of logarithmic foliations Fernando Cukierman, Marcio G. Soares and Israel Vainsencher Abstract A logarithmic 1-form on CPn canbewrittenas m m dFi ω = Fj λi = λ0F0 dF0 + ···+ λmFm dFm 0 0 Fi m with Fi =( 0 Fj)/Fi for some homogeneous polynomials Fi of degree di and constants λi ∈ C such that λidi = 0. For general Fi,λi, the singularities of ω consist of a schematic union of the codimension 2 subvarieties Fi = Fj = 0 together with, possibly, finitely many isolated points. This is the case when all Fi are smooth and in general position. In this situation, we give a formula which prescribes the number of isolated singularities. 1. Introduction and statement of result The search for numerical invariants attached to algebraic foliations goes back to Poincar´e[Poi91]. He was interested in determining bounds for the degree of curves left invariant by a polynomial vector field on C2. Recent work has treated the question by establishing relations for the number of singularities of the foliation and certain Chern numbers and then using positivity of certain bundles. For a survey of recent results, see [Bru00, CL91, Est02, Soa00]. A foliation of dimension r on a smooth variety X of dimension n is a coherent subsheaf F of the tangent sheaf TX of generic rank r, locally split in codimension 2. 1 If r = n − 1 (codimension one foliations), the foliation corresponds to a global section of ΩX ⊗L for some line bundle L. n Suppose X = CP , with homogeneous coordinates x0,...,xn.
    [Show full text]
  • A Method to Compute Segre Classes of Subschemes of Projective Space
    A METHOD TO COMPUTE SEGRE CLASSES OF SUBSCHEMES OF PROJECTIVE SPACE DAVID EKLUND, CHRISTINE JOST, AND CHRIS PETERSON Abstract. We present a method to compute the degrees of the Segre classes of a subscheme of complex projective space. The method is based on generic residuation and intersection theory. We provide a symbolic implementation using the software system Macaulay2 and a numerical implementation using the software package Bertini. 1. Introduction Segre classes are generalizations of characteristic classes of vector bundles and they occur frequently in intersection theory. Many problems in enumerative geome- try may be solved by computing the Segre classes of an algebraic scheme. Given an n-dimensional subscheme Z of complex projective space there are n+1 Segre classes of Z. The ith Segre class is a rational equivalence class of codimension i cycles on Z. Thus a Segre class may be represented as a weighted sum of irreducible subvarieties V1,...,Vm of Z. The degree of a Segre class is the corresponding weighted sum of the degrees of the projective varieties V1,...,Vm. In this paper we present a method to compute the degrees of the Segre classes of Z, given an ideal defining Z. The procedure is based on the intersection theory of Fulton and MacPherson. More specifically, we prove a B´ezout like theorem that involves the Segre classes of Z and a residual scheme to Z. The degree of the residual may be computed providing intersection-theoretic information on the Segre classes. This enables us to compute the degrees of these classes. If Z is smooth, the degrees of the Segre classes of Z carry the same information as the degrees of the Chern classes of the tangent bundle of Z.
    [Show full text]