DOCSLIB.ORG

Mole Valley in the County of Surrsy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. 50 I LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND' REPORT NO. 5O LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Sir Edmund .Compton, GCB.KBE. DEPUTY CHAIRMAN - Mr J M Rankin,QC. MEMBERS The Countess Of Albemarle, DBE. Mr T C Benfield. Professor Michael Chisholm. Sir Andrew Wheatley,CBE. Mr P B Young, CBE. To the Rt Hon Roy Jenkins, MP"" Secretarv of State for the Hcrnc Department PROPOSALS FOR RAISED ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE DISTRICT OF MOLE VALLEY IN THE COUNTY OF SURRSY 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for the district of Mole Valley in accordance with-the requirements of section 63 of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that district. 2m In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(1) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 13 May 197^ that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the Mole Valley District Council, copies of which were circulated to the Surrey County Council, Parish Councils in the district, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies • concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted^in the local press announced the start 'of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from any interested bodies. 3- Mole Valley District Council were invited to prepare a draft scheme of representation for our consideration. In doing so, they were asked to observe the rules laid down in Schedule .11 to the Local Government Act 1972 and the guidelines which we set out in our Report No 6 about the proposed size of council and the proposed number of councillors for each ward. They were asked also to take into account any views expressed to them following their consultation with local interests. We therefore asked that they should publish details of their provisional proposals about a month before they submitted their draft scheme to us, thus allowing an opportunity for local comments. 4. On 29 November 197^j Mole Valley District Council presented their draft scheme of representation. In accordance with Section 7('+) of the Local Government Act 1972 they had exercised an option for election by thirds and they proposed to divide the area into 23 wards each returning one, two or three members to form a council of *f2. 5. Following the publication of the Council's proposals we received a letter from a parish council suggesting that the proposed Box' Hill ward should be renamed "Headley and Mickleham". The Council sent us copies of their correspondence with the County Council, parish councils, political parties and other bodies both during the period when the scheme was in preparation -and after its publication. We noted that there were a few instances where the Council had not been.able to accept the suggestionsmade and incorporate them in their scheme. 6. We considered the draft scheme and the suggested modifications. In the case of the name of the proposed Box Hill ward we considered that this name - after a very well known local geographical feature - was more appropriate than the alternative, which we decided to reject. We reviewed the suggestions rejected by the District Council but concluded in each case that their decision had been appropriate. • • 7. We considered several possibilities for adapting the Council's draft scheme so as to secure a more even standard of representation. We decided that the balance between the proposed Ashbead Village and- Ashtead Park wards would be improved by an adjustment of the boundary between the two wards. 8. We studied the District Council's proposed plan for .the order of retirement of councillors and made a number of modifications mainly to avoid the need to transfer the elections in a number of parishes from the normal year for parish elections. To the Rt Hon Roy Jenkins, HP Secretary of Stati :cr the Home Department PROPOSES FOR REVISED ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE DISTRICT OF MOLE VALLEY IN THE COUNTY OF SURREY 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for the district of Mole Valley in accordance with the requirements of section 63 of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that district. 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(1) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 13 May 197^ that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the Mole Valley District Council, copies of which were circulated to the Surrey County Council, Parish Councils in the district, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from any interested bodies. 3« Hole Valley District Council were invited to prepare a draft scheme of representation for our consideration. In doing so, they were asked to observe the rules laid down in Schedule 11 to the Local Government Act 1972 and the guidelines which we set out in our Report No 6 about the proposed size of council and the proposed number of councillors for each ward. They were asked also to take into account any views expressed to them following their consultation with local interests. We therefore asked that they should publish details of their provisional proposals about a month before they submitted their draft scheme to us, tlius allowing an opportunity for local comments. 4. On 29 November 197^, Hole Valley District Council presented their draft scheme of representation. In accordance with Section 7(^) of the Local Government Act 1972 they had exercised an option for election by thirds and they proposed to divide the area into 23 wards each returning one, two or three members to form a council of 42. 5. Following the publication of the Council's proposals we received a letter from a parish council suggesting that the proposed Box Hill ward should be renamed "Headley and Hickleham". The Council sent us copies of their correspondence with 1;he County Council, parish councils, political parties and other bodies both during the period when the scheme was in preparation and after its publication. We noted that there were a fev; instances where the Council had not been.able to accept the suggestionsmade and incorporate them in their scheme* 6. V.'e considered the draft scheme and the suggested modifications. In the case of the name of the proposed Box Hill.ward we considered that this name - after a very well known local geographical feature - was more appropriate than the alternative, which we decided to reject. We reviewed the suggestions rejected by"the District Council but concluded in-each case that their decision had been appropriate. V. We considered several possibilities for adapting the Council's draft scheme so as to secure a more even standard of representation. We decided that the balance between the proposed Ashtead Village and Ashtead Park wards, would be improved by an adjustment of the boundary between the two wards. 8. V/e studied the District Council's proposed plan for the order of retirement of councillors and made a number of modifications mainly to avoid the need to transfer the elections in a number of parishes from the normal year for parish elections. 9. After consulting Ordnanco Survey we made a number of minor adjustments to the alignment of some of the boundaries in order to secure boundary linei which were more readily identifiable on the ground* • ' ' 10. Subject to the changes referred to in paragraphs 7» 8 and 9 above wo decided that the District Council's draft scheme provided a reasonable basis for the future electoral arrangements of the District in compliance with the rules in Schedule 11 to the 1972 Act and our guidelines, and we formulated our draft proposals accordingly, 11. On 26 February 1975 we issued our draf-t proposals and these were sent to all who had received our consultation-letter or who had commented on the Council's draft scheme. The Council were asked to make these draft proposals, and the accompanying maps which defined the proposed ward boundaries, available for inspection at their main offices. Representations on our draft proposals were •invited from those to whom they v/ere circulated and, by public notices, from other members of the public and interested bodies. We asked that any comments should reach us by 30 April 1975- 12. Mole Valley District Council informed us that they accepted the draft . - proposals but sxiggested two small boundary alterations. -They asked also that v/e should accept the scheme for the order of retirement of councillors originally submitted by them rather than the modified version which we'had published. 13- Two local political Associations challenged the proposed allocation of 3 members to the proposed'North Holmwood ward. They suggested representation should be reduced to two-councillors -and there was a suggestion that "the ward be divided into two wards each returning one member. 1^. A parish council suggested that -the proposed Beare Green ward comprising the parish of Holmwood and the Beare Green ward of the parish of Capel should be re-named "Holmwood and Beare Green" ward.
Recommended publications
  • Domewood and Dormansland

    Domewood and Dormansland

    Tandridge DC Site-Based Ecology Assessments Site Ref DOM 011 Site Name Forge Farm Nurseries Area (ha) 1.06 Grid Ref TQ354417 Possible Uses Mixed; Gypsy & Settlement Domewood (from HELAA/ENA) Traveller Section 1: Desk Study Statutory There are no SSSI, NNR or LNR within the site area or the 1km search Designations area. There is however Hedgecourt SSSI located south approx. 1.3km (1km radius) outside the search area and general connectivity would be considered good. There are two areas of TPOs south east, south and south west of the site. Non-Statutory There are no SNCIs within the site area or the search area. Designations (1km) pSNCIs Domewood Meadows and Bakers Wood are situated 150m south of the site with good connectivity. The Plantation is situated 1km north of the site. Priority Habitats There is a small amount of ancient woodland within the 250m search (on site and 250m area south of the site, this connects to a much larger area of ancient radius) woodland outside the search area. The site consists of hedgerows and arable fields. To the south of the site approx. 150m is a series of water bodies. Protected &/or Small Watervole 1km south The connectivity would be Priority Species on mammals considered good as there Site (1km) are a number of waterways connecting to the site. European 1.2 km south The connectivity would be otter east considered good as there are a number of waterways connecting to the site. Otters are known to have very large territories which cover multiple kilometres. Biodiversity The BOA Eden (plus tributaries) is located south of the site.
  • Brockwood Medical Practice

    Brockwood Medical Practice

    BROCKWOOD MEDICAL PRACTICE Dr J D Richards Dr J R Thompson Dr L E Rawson Dr T A Sevenoaks Dr R P Gupta Dr A G Brett PATIENT SURVEY 2019 INFORMATION AND ACTION PLAN The GP Patient Survey is an independent survey run by Ipsos MORI on behalf of NHS England. It gives patients the opportunity to feed back their experience. The survey is carried out January – March 2019 with results published August 2019. In this year’s survey, 268 surveys were sent out and 123 returned – 46% completion rate. For more information, please visit: https://www.gp-patient.co.uk/report?w=1&practicecode=H81068 The key question ‘overall experience of this GP Practice’ gave our practice a score of 93% satisfaction . The national average is 83% and our CCG average (Clinical Commissioning Group) is 85%. Areas where the Practice does best • Patients find it easy to get through to the surgery by phone • Patients were offered a choice of appointment when they last tried to make a GP appointment • Patients described their experience of making an appointment as good Our GP Services • Patients found it easy to get through to the practice by phone • Patients found reception staff helpful • Patients were happy with the appointment times available. Making an appointment • Patients felt they were offered a choice of appointment • Patients were satisfied with the type of appointment offered and took the appointment offered • Patients described their experience of making an appointment as good Patients’ last appointment • Patients waited 15mins or less after their appointment time
  • Su103 Box Hill from Westhumble

    Su103 Box Hill from Westhumble

    0 Miles 1 2 su103 Box Hill from Westhumble 0 Kilometres 1 2 3 The Burford Bridge roundabout is on the The walk shown is for guidance only and should With thanks to Dean Woodrow A24 between Dorking and Leatherhead not be attempted without suitable maps. Details 3 Go W (right) up the road for 200m and then 5 Go NW (left) across the grass to reach a SE on a signed path that descends through a road and then W (left) on the road to go N Distance: 11km (7 miles) field, a wood and a 2nd field to reach a road. pass the car park and NT Shop. At a '1.5T' Total Ascent: 340m (1115ft) Go E (left) on the road past the remains of road sign go NW (left) past Box Hill Fort to Time: 31/2 hrs Grade: 4 Westhumble Chapel to reach a crossroads. Go descend a bridleway to a fork. Go NW (left) to Maps: OS Landranger® 187 SE on Adlers Lane and continue SE at a join a 2nd path that descends across the or OS Explorer Map™ 146 junction. At a crossing path go S (right) on a grass. After 200m fork (W) left on a faint path Start/Finish: Burford Bridge Car Park footpath (signed 'Dorking') to reach a 2nd to descend more steeply. Continue through a A24 S of Mickleham, Surrey crossing path - The North Downs Way (NDW). small wood to reach a road opposite the car 1 Grid Ref: TQ172521 (1 /2 km) park and the start. (2km) Sat Nav: N51.2560 W0.3227 4 Go E (left) on the NDW to pass under the railway and then cross the A24.
  • 21 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route

    21 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route

    21 bus time schedule & line map 21 Crawley - Dorking - Leatherhead - Epsom View In Website Mode The 21 bus line (Crawley - Dorking - Leatherhead - Epsom) has 4 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Box Hill: 7:08 PM (2) Crawley: 6:51 AM - 5:15 PM (3) Epsom: 6:20 AM - 2:46 PM (4) Leatherhead: 5:30 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 21 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 21 bus arriving. Direction: Box Hill 21 bus Time Schedule 19 stops Box Hill Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 7:08 PM Leatherhead Railway Station (T) Station Approach, Leatherhead Tuesday 7:08 PM Leret Way, Leatherhead Wednesday 7:08 PM Leret Way, Leatherhead Thursday 7:08 PM The Crescent, Leatherhead Friday 7:08 PM Russell Court, Leatherhead Saturday Not Operational Highlands Road, Leatherhead Seeability, Leatherhead Lavender Close, Leatherhead 21 bus Info Clinton Road, Leatherhead Direction: Box Hill Stops: 19 Glenheadon Rise, Leatherhead Trip Duration: 27 min Line Summary: Leatherhead Railway Station (T), Tyrrells Wood, Leatherhead Leret Way, Leatherhead, The Crescent, Leatherhead, Highlands Road, Leatherhead, Seeability, Headley Court, Headley Leatherhead, Clinton Road, Leatherhead, Glenheadon Rise, Leatherhead, Tyrrells Wood, Hurst Lane, Headley Leatherhead, Headley Court, Headley, Hurst Lane, Headley, The Cock Inn, Headley, Broome Close, The Cock Inn, Headley Headley, Crossroads, Headley, Headley Common Road, Headley, Headley Common Road, Broome Close, Headley Pebblecombe, The Tree, Box Hill,
  • Oaks Lane, Brambles

    Oaks Lane, Brambles

    Brambles, Oaks Lane, Mid Holmwood, Dorking, Surrey, RH5 4ES Price Guide £525,000 Freehold Brambles, Oaks Lane, South Holmwood, Dorking, Surrey, RH5 4ES • 5 Bedroom Detached Bungalow • Entrance Hall, Sitting Room, Breakfast Room • In Need of Significant Improvement • Kitchen, Lean to, 3 Bedrooms, Bathroom 171 High Street, Dorking, • Plot Extends to Approx 0.65 of an Acre • Annexe with Sitting Room, Kitchen, 2 Bedrooms, Bathroom Surrey, RH4 1AD • Approx 2.75 miles from Dorking Town Centre • 2 Garages, Parking, Garden & Adjacent Paddock Area Tel: 01306 877775 [email protected] • Set on to Holmwood Common • EPC Rating E & Council Tax Band F www.patrickgardner.com The Property Brambles is a 5 bedroom detached bungalow in need of significant Situation The property is situated on Holmwood improvement in a small garden with an adjacent paddock and the whole plot extends to Common, an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, in the approximately 0.65 of an acre. Green Belt, owned and managed by the National Trust. The accommodation comprises entrance porch, entrance hall, sitting room, breakfast Oaks Lane is accessed of the north bound carriageway room, kitchen with lean to off, three bedrooms and a bathroom in the main part of the of the A24 dual carriageway between North & South bungalow with access off the breakfast room to the annexe with an inner hallway, sitting Holmwood. room, kitchen, two bedrooms, one with a lean to off and a bathroom. Dorking town centre is approx. 2.75 miles away with its Outside there is a five bar gate and parking for 2/3 cars, there are two garages, both with comprehensive range of facilities including 5 super up and over doors and one with a further up and over door at the rear leading on to the markets, a well regarded range of local and national back garden area.
  • LRA Newsletter Summer 2016 a Publisher

    LRA Newsletter Summer 2016 a Publisher

    5 6 5 6 8 8 3 . Wish you were here? 8 8 http://www.leatherheadresidents.org.uk In this Issue P2 Chairman’s Message P5 Nower Wood Lottery Funding P2 Buses - 'All change please' P5 'Here Come the Cows' P3 Norbury Park Conservation P5 Leatherhead Art Club Exhibition P4 Transform Leatherhead P6 River Mole Nature Reserve P4 Planning & Development General P7 Sutton & East surrey Water P8 Vintage Buses & Open Gardens Chairman's Message Dear Member, I have decided to start this Newsletter with some of the history of and current status information regarding Leach Grove Wood. Just over 100 years ago, the whole area now occupied by The Beeches, Poplar and Highlands Avenue, Leatherhead Hospital, Woodlands School, and Beech Holt was quite thickly wooded. A Mr. Leach owned it. Gradually, parcels were sold off and finally in about 1935 he made a gift of the current hospital grounds (containing the area now known as Leach Grove Wood) to Leatherhead Urban District Council. The gift was believed to stipulate medical use in perpetuity. The exact size and details of Mr. Leach’s gift became lost to memory until efforts to ensure the remaining part of the wood was protected were made firstly in the 1980s when the then owners, SCC wanted to sell the land for housing, and then repeated in the last three years. Naturally, the current owners, NHS Property Services Ltd were keen to establish complete control over “their” land, whereas the surrounding population had got very used to the freedom and rusticity afforded by this unusual feature and did not want to lose their “rights” over it, accrued by time, so NHS Property Services Ltd.
  • Esher West End and River Mole

    Esher West End and River Mole

    point your feet on a new path Six Ponds and a River Bank Esher West End and River Mole Distance: 5½ km=3½ miles easy walking: 1 or 2 slopes and steps Region: Surrey Date written: 19-nov-2010 Refreshments: West End Village Date revised: 23-may-2020 Author: Schwebefuss Last update: 12-nov-2020 Map: Explorer 161 (London South) but the map in this guide should be sufficient Problems, changes? We depend on your feedback: [email protected] Public rights are restricted to printing, copying or distributing this document exactly as seen here, complete and without any cutting or editing. See Principles on main webpage. Woodland, river, heath, ponds In Brief This woodland walk begins by a quiet village pond near Esher, Surrey and quickly develops into a wild ramble along the River Mole and then over beech- and pine-clad hills. It also takes in all six ponds of this part of Esher Common, some hidden deep in the woods. The woodland, river and ponds are attractive at any time of the year. The walk begins beside the Prince of Wales Pond , grid ref 129639, postcode KT10 8LJ . To get there from the A3 road, turn off for Cobham or Esher, take the A307 Portsmouth Road that runs between Esher and Cobham and turn onto Hawkshill Way or West End Lane to reach the village pond. Alternatively, if you know the area, take Lammas Lane from the centre of Esher. Park in Winterdown Road where there is plenty of off-road parking. There is more parking space further up Winterdown Road, past the entrance to Garsons .
  • 227 10 SD01 Licence Strategy Template

    227 10 SD01 Licence Strategy Template

    Mole Abstraction licensing strategy February 2013 A licensing strategy to manage water resources sustainably Reference number/code LIT 3097 We are the Environment Agency. It's our job to look after your environment and make it a better place - for you, and for future generations. Your environment is the air you breathe, the water you drink and the ground you walk on. Working with business, Government and society as a whole, we are making your environment cleaner and healthier. The Environment Agency. Out there, making your environment a better place. Published by: Environment Agency Horizon House Deanery Road Bristol BS1 5AH Tel: 0370 8506506 Email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Environment Agency Mole CAMS 1 Map 1 Mole CAMS (Catchment Abstraction Management Strategy) area Back 2 Environment Agency Mole CAMS Foreword Kent and South London (KSL) is home to six million people and covers an area of 6,000km² with a diverse range of environments and related pressures. Proposed growth will continue to stretch the resources available to support this increasing population. Water is our most essential natural resource, and it is our job to ensure that we manage and use it effectively and sustainably. KSL is one of the driest parts of England and Wales and there are many catchments where there is little or no water available for abstraction during dry periods. Demand from agriculture and industry, and above average household consumption all add to this pressure and affect both the water environment and fresh supplies.
  • OXF8027 RPS HRA Screening Report Draft NPS Revision

    OXF8027 RPS HRA Screening Report Draft NPS Revision

    APPENDIX 5 GATWICK RUNWAY 2 MOLE GAP TO REIGATE ESCARPMENT SAC & ASHDOWN FOREST SPA/SAC REVISED HABITAT REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT REPORT: STAGE 1 (SCREENING) December 2017 Our Ref: OXF8027 RPS 20 Western Avenue Milton Park Abingdon OX14 4SH rpsgroup.com QUALITY MANAGEMENT Prepared by: Elizabeth White, Nick Betson, Fiona Prismall Reviewed by: Mike Barker, Julia Tindale Authorised by: David Cowan Date: December 2017 (Updated for Revised Draft NPS Consultation) Project Number/Document 8027 – HRA Screening Report Reference: COPYRIGHT © RPS The material presented in this report is confidential. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Gatwick Airport Limited and shall not be distributed or made available to any other company or person without the knowledge and written consent of RPS. Revised Habitats Regulations Assessment Screening December 2017 rpsgroup .com /uk CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... I 1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF ASSESSMENT .......................................................................... 1 Background and Purpose of this Report .................................................................................................. 1 HRA Process ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Guidance and Information Used in Preparing this Report ......................................................................
  • North Downs Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statements

    North Downs Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statements

    Biodiversity Opportunity Areas: the basis for realising Surrey’s ecological network Appendix 6: North Downs Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statements ND01: North Downs Scarp; The Hog's Back ND02: North Downs Scarp & Dip; Guildford to the Mole Gap ND03: North Downs Scarp & Dip; Mole Gap to Reigate ND04: North Downs; Epsom Downs to Nonsuch Park ND05: North Downs; Banstead Woods & Downs and Chipstead Downs ND06: North Downs Scarp; Quarry Hangers to the A22 ND07: North Downs Scarp; Woldingham ND08: North Downs; Banstead & Walton Heaths September 2019 Investing in our County’s future Surrey Biodiversity Opportunity Area Policy Statement Biodiversity Opportunity Area ND01: North Downs Scarp; The Hog’s Back Local authorities: Guildford, Waverley Aim & justification: The aim of Biodiversity Opportunity Areas (BOAs) is to establish a strategic framework for conserving and enhancing biodiversity at a landscape scale, making our wildlife more robust to changing climate and socio-economic pressures. BOAs are those areas where targeted maintenance, restoration and creation of Natural Environment & Rural Communities (NERC) Act ‘Habitats of Principal Importance’, ie. Priority habitats will have the greatest benefit towards achieving this aim. Realising BOA aims will contribute to UK commitments to halt biodiversity declines, and their recognition directly meets current National Planning Policy Framework policy to plan strategically for the enhancement of the natural environment; to be achieved by providing net gains for biodiversity and establishing coherent ecological networks that are more resilient to current and future pressures (para. 170). Designation of BOAs also fulfils NPPF requirements to identify, map and safeguard components of wider ecological networks, and areas identified for habitat management, enhancement, restoration or creation (para.
  • 1 Mole Valley District Council Decisions Made Application

    1 Mole Valley District Council Decisions Made Application

    Date: 02/04/2021 Page: 1 Mole Valley District Council Decisions Made Application No.: MO/2020/1971/PLAH Link Location: 81, Links Road, Ashtead, Surrey, KT21 2HL Proposal: Erection of a part single, part two storey side and rear extension, two storey side extension and fenestration changes. Decision: APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Decision Date: 31-Mar-2021 Ward: Ashtead Common Parish: Ashtead (Unparished) Application No.: MO/2020/2223/PLAH Link Location: 183, Craddocks Avenue, Ashtead, Surrey, KT21 1NT Proposal: Erection of part two storey part single storey rear extension and pitched roof over existing flat roof to front. Decision: APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Decision Date: 01-Apr-2021 Ward: Ashtead Common, Within 20m of Ashtead Village Ward Parish: Ashtead (Unparished) Application No.: MO/2021/0060/PLAH Link Location: 21, Overdale, Ashtead, Surrey, KT21 1PW Proposal: Erection of a log cabin in rear garden. Decision: APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Decision Date: 31-Mar-2021 Ward: Ashtead Common Parish: Ashtead (Unparished) Date: 02/04/2021 Page: 2 Mole Valley District Council Decisions Made Application No.: MO/2021/0082/PNHH Link Location: 34, St Stephens Avenue, Ashtead, Surrey, KT21 1PL Proposal: Prior notification for the erection of a single storey rear extension of 4.5 metres deep and 3 metres high with an eaves height of 2.4 metres. Decision: PRIOR APPROVAL NOT REQUIRED Decision Date: 29-Mar-2021 Ward: Ashtead Common Parish: Ashtead (Unparished) Application No.: MO/2021/0093/PLAH Link Location: 75, Culverhay, Ashtead, Surrey, KT21 1PS Proposal: Erection of single storey rear extension. Decision: APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS Decision Date: 01-Apr-2021 Ward: Ashtead Common Parish: Ashtead (Unparished) Application No.: MO/2021/0236/PCL Link Location: Willows, Greville Park Road, Ashtead, Surrey, KT21 2QN Proposal: Certificate of Lawfulness for the proposed development in respect of a loft conversion with rear dormer window.
  • From 3 and 4 September 2016 There Will Be Changes to Some Local Bus Services in Surrey

    From 3 and 4 September 2016 There Will Be Changes to Some Local Bus Services in Surrey

    From 3 and 4 September 2016 there will be changes to some local bus services in Surrey. West Surrey: 11, 16, 19, 23/25, East Surrey: 21, 22, 26, 29, 100, 24, 46, 48, 59, 70, 71, 72, 125, 236, 317, 318, 319, 357, 409, 410, 462, 463, 500, 503, 504, 520, 416, 424, 460/480, 479, 509, 516, 523, 538 594/595, 658, 668, Buses 4U This leaflet includes details of what the changes are for each service, and where and when new timetables will be available. surreycc.gov.uk/buses 0300 200 1003 | SMS: 07527 182 861 Changes to local bus services – information for passengers Where can I find out what changes are being made to my local bus service? West Surrey Pages 4 - 8 East Surrey Pages 9 - 14 Please note: if your bus service is not included in this leaflet, no changes are being planned by Surrey County Council, or have been notified to the council by a bus operator, at the time of going to print. To check for any later updates, please visit surreycc.gov.uk/buses. When will the changes be introduced? The changes in this leaflet will be introduced from Saturday 3 and Sunday 4 September 2016. 2 Where and when will new timetables be available? During August, new timetables will be available: • Online on the bus operator websites (see back cover) and via their own timetable publications • Online at surreycc.gov.uk/buses and traveline.info/se • By calling Traveline on 0871 200 2233 (Calls cost 12p per minute plus your phone company’s access charge).