DOCSLIB.ORG

Diapositiva 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Diapositiva 1 Población total y tasa de crecimiento . Población por sexo . Relación hombres/mujeres . Población total por entidad federativa . Población por tamaño de localidad, 1990-2010 . Estructura de la población, 1990-2010 . Razón de dependencia total, infantil y vejez, 1990-2010 . Promedio de hijos nacidos vivos, 1990-2010 . Promedio de hijos nacidos según escolaridad . Tasas global (TGF) y específica de fecundidad, 1999 y 2009 . Tasas global (TGF) y específica IDH . Hijos fallecidos, 1990-2010 . Hijos fallecidos por entidad federativa . Hijos fallecidos IDH . Población nacida en otra entidad o país por entidad federativa . Población nacida en otro país según sexo, 1990-2010 . Saldo neto migratorio por entidad federativa . Saldo neto migratorio para entidades seleccionadas . Población emigrante del Distrito Federal según principales entidades receptoras . Migrantes municipales al interior de la entidad federativa . Migrantes internacionales por movimiento migratorio . Migrantes internacionales/entidades origen de la migración México ocupa el lugar número 11 en población a nivel mundial. 97.5 Millones 81.2 66.8 Tasa de crecimiento 48.2 34.9 25.8 3.4 19.7 3.1 3.2 16.6 2.7 13.6 15.2 14.3 2.0 1.9 12.7 1.7 1.8 1.4 1.4 1.1 -0.5 1895 1900 1910 1921 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Años 103.2 102.9 100.3 92.3 91.3 91.1 89.9 83.8 0-4 5-14 15-19 20-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70 y más Grupos de edad Tasa México 15.176 1.4 Distrito Federal 8.851 0.3 Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave 7.643 1.0 Jalisco 7.351 1.5 Puebla 5.780 1.3 Guanajuato 5.486 1.6 Chiapas 4.797 2.0 Nuevo León 4.653 1.9 Entidades con mayor Michoacán de Ocampo 4.351 0.9 crecimiento absoluto Oaxaca 3.802 1.0 Chihuahua 3.406 1.1 Guerrero 3.389 0.9 Millones Tamaulipas 3.269 1.7 Baja California 3.155 2.3 México 2.1 Sinaloa 2.768 0.9 Jalisco 1.0 Coahuila de Zaragoza 2.748 1.8 Hidalgo 2.665 1.7 Chiapas 0.876 Sonora 2.662 1.8 Guanajuato 0.823 San Luis Potosí 2.586 1.1 Nuevo León 0.819 Tabasco 2.239 1.6 Yucatán 1.956 1.6 Querétaro 1.828 2.6 Morelos 1.777 1.3 Durango 1.633 1.2 Zacatecas 1.491 0.9 Quintana Roo 1.326 4.1 Aguascalientes 1.185 2.2 Tlaxcala 1.170 1.9 Nayarit 1.085 1.6 Campeche 0.822 1.7 Colima 0.651 1.8 Baja California Sur 0.637 4.0 47.8 100 000 y más hab. 47.3 44.4 14.7 15 000-99 999 hab. 13.6 13.1 14.3 2 500-14 999 hab. 13.7 13.9 23.2 Menos de 2 500 hab. 25.4 28.6 1990 2000 2010 188 593 localidades menores de 2 500 habitantes. 131 localidades de 100 000 y más habitantes. Grupos quinquenales de edad: 85 años y más 80-84 75-79 70-74 65-69 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 15-19 10-14 5-9 0-4 % % % % 85 años y más 1990 80-84 2000 75-79 70-74 65-69 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 15-19 10-14 5-9 0-4 % % 2010 Grandes grupos de edad: 0-14, 15-64, 65 y más 4.2 % 5.0 % 57.2 % 60.9 % Mediana 19 años Mediana 22 años 38.6 % 34.1 % % % % % 1990 2000 6.3 % 64.4 % Mediana 26 años 29.3 % % % 2010 7 8 10 Dependencia 74 total 67 64 56 55 45 1990 2000 2010 Dependencia infantil Dependencia vejez En 2010, hay 55 dependientes por cada 100 personas en edad de trabajar. 5.5 4.7 Promedio de hijos nacidos vivos 3.9 4.4 3.8 2.4 3.0 2.0 3.2 1.7 2.5 3.3 2.0 2.9 1.7 2.5 0.9 2.1 1.5 0.2 0.8 0.1 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 1990 2000 2010 Grupos de edad 1990 2000 2010 Nota: Excluye a las mujeres que no especificaron si han tenido hijos nacidos vivos y a las que si han tenido hijos, pero no especificaron el total de ellos. Total 1.7 Educación media y superior 1.1 Secundaria 1.6 Primaria completa 2.5 3.3 Primaria incompleta 3.5 Sin escolaridad Tasas específicas de fecundidad 154.2 151.3 TGF Hijos por cada 1 000 mujeres 2.9 111.0 2.4 131.0 124.6 -15.0% -17.6% 64.2 94.3 61.7 -15.0% -27.6% -53.6% 56.7 49.8 22.8 -11.7% 5.6 1999 2009 -19.3% 16.5 2.6 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 Grupos de edad Porcentaje de 1999 2009 disminución Nota: Las tasas se presentan para 1999 y 2009, debido a que para su cálculo se utilizan los nacimientos ocurridos en el año anterior al levantamiento de información. Tasas específicas de fecundidad Hijos por cada 1 000 mujeres TGF 190.7 189.4 161.5 4.0 131.0 124.6 120.4 94.3 2.4 2.1 76.5 111.6 108.0 49.8 56.6 56.7 84.8 16.5 13.5 49.6 44.5 2.6 13.7 1.9 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 EUM Mayor Menor IDH IDH Grupos de edad EUM Mayor IDH Menor IDH 27.5 26.0 22.0 18.7 20.2 16.5 17.5 20.6 14.2 12.4 15.3 10.8 13.2 15.8 Porcentaje 11.3 10.9 8.8 13.3 10.7 nacional de 7.0 9.4 11.2 hijos 5.4 7.5 8.1 4.3 4.3 4.7 5.9 9.2 fallecidos 3.9 4.7 7.3 3.2 3.5 3.9 5.8 2.7 4.5 2.3 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.8 3.5 12 - 14 15 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 29 30 - 34 35 - 39 40 - 44 45 - 49 50 - 54 55 - 59 60 - 64 65 - 69 70 - 74 75 y más Grupos de edad de la mujer 1990 2000 2010 Nota: Excluye a los hijos fallecidos cuando los nacidos vivos no fueron especificados. Guerrero 11.2 Oaxaca 11.0 Puebla 10.1 Zacatecas 9.6 Chiapas 9.4 Michoacán de Ocampo 9.3 Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave 9.2 San Luis Potosí 8.9 Hidalgo 8.8 Durango 8.8 Nayarit 8.7 Guanajuato 8.7 Tlaxcala 8.7 Estados Unidos Mexicanos 8.1 Colima 7.9 Chihuahua 7.8 Jalisco 7.8 Querétaro 7.8 Tabasco 7.7 Morelos 7.7 México 7.6 Campeche 7.5 Sinaloa 7.4 Aguascalientes 7.2 Yucatán 6.9 Coahuila de Zaragoza 6.6 Tamaulipas 6.5 Sonora 6.4 Distrito Federal 6.2 Baja California 6.1 Quintana Roo 6.0 Baja Californa Sur 5.7 Nuevo León 5.5 Nota: Excluye a los hijos fallecidos cuando los nacidos vivos no fueron especificados. 32.9 28.4 14.1 25.1 22.5 8.1 20.6 6.3 18.9 15.6 15.8 12.7 13.3 17.2 11.2 EUM Mayor Menor 9.9 9.2 IDH IDH 7.4 7.3 12.5 5.6 5.8 10.4 4.6 4.5 4.0 3.5 8.5 2.5 2.7 6.8 2.2 2.4 2.8 2.4 5.3 1.9 3.4 4.2 2.3 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.7 12-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75 y más Grupos de edad de la mujer EUM Mayor IDH Menor IDH Nota: Excluye a los hijos fallecidos cuando los nacidos vivos no fueron especificados. Migración por lugar de nacimiento Quintana Roo 54.0 Baja California 45.1 Baja California Sur 39.7 México 37.0 Colima 29.6 Morelos 27.9 Tamaulipas 25.3 Querétaro 23.8 Campeche 22.7 Nuevo León 21.3 Nayarit 20.7 Entidades con mayor Aguascalientes 20.5 Distrito Federal 19.8 población nacida fuera EstadosEstados Unidos Unidos Mexicanos Mexicanos 18.4 de la entidad Chihuahua 17.6 Sonora 17.3 Tlaxcala 16.4 Millones Hidalgo 16.3 Jalisco 14.2 México 5.6 Coahuila de Zaragoza 14.0 Durango 12.5 Distrito Federal 1.8 Zacatecas 12.0 Baja California 1.4 San Luis Potosí 10.7 Sinaloa 10.3 Jalisco 1.0 Michoacán de Ocampo 10.1 Nuevo León 1.0 Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave 9.9 Guanajuato 9.7 Puebla 9.6 Tabasco 9.0 Yucatán 8.3 Oaxaca 7.0 Guerrero 6.0 Chiapas 3.6 Migración por lugar de nacimiento Miles 493 341 249 243 172 169 Total Hombres Mujeres 1990 2000 2010 Migración por entidad de residencia en junio de 2005 (migración interna) Baja California Sur -3.2 13.2 10.0 Quintana Roo -4.5 12.6 8.1 Colima -3.3 7.3 4.0 Nayarit -3.2 6.6 3.4 Querétaro -2.5 5.9 3.4 Hidalgo -2.9 5.2 2.3 Morelos -2.9 5.0 2.1 México -2.5 4.3 2.0 Aguascalientes -2.3 4.0 1.7 Nuevo León -1.9 3.3 1.4 Tlaxcala -2.5 3.7 1.2 Baja California -4.7 5.6 0.9 Sonora -2.5 3.4 0.9 Campeche -3.9 4.6 0.7 Yucatán -2.2 2.8 0.6 Tamaulipas -3.4 3.8 0.4 Guanajuato -1.6 1.9 0.3 Jalisco -2.4 2.5 0.1 Coahuila de Zaragoza -2.5 2.5 0.0 Puebla -2.7 2.6 -0.1 San Luis Potosí -2.7 2.5 -0.2 Zacatecas -2.8 2.4 -0.4 Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave -3.5 3.0 -0.5 Michoacán de Ocampo -2.7 2.1 -0.6 Oaxaca -3.1 2.5 -0.6 Durango -3.4 2.8 -0.6 Chihuahua -2.9 2.0 -0.9 Sinaloa -4.1 3.0 -1.1 Chiapas -2.5 1.2 -1.3 Tabasco -3.4 2.0 -1.4 Guerrero -3.6 1.8 -1.8 Distrito Federal -9.3 3.0 -6.3 Emigrantes Inmigrantes Saldo Neto Migratorio Interno Migración por entidad de residencia en junio de 2005 (migración interna) Entidades con mayor saldo Entidades con mayor saldo neto migratorio positivo neto migratorio negativo en absolutos en absolutos Miles Miles México 251.0 Distrito Federal -498.6 Quintana Roo 92.0 Chiapas -55.3 Nuevo León 57.5 Guerrero -54.5 Baja California Sur 56.1 Veracruz -30.3 Querétaro 55.4 Tabasco -28.7 382 202 México 37 457 Hidalgo 32 459 Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave 30 448 Puebla 29 691 Querétaro Migración por municipio de residencia en junio de 2005 (migración intraestatal) Nuevo León 10.6 Jalisco 5.5 México 5.5 Distrito Federal 4.4 Colima 3.9 Morelos 3.6 Tlaxcala 3.3 EstadosEstados Unidos Unidos Mexicanos Mexicanos 3.2 Hidalgo 2.8 Nayarit 2.7 Sonora 2.7 Baja California Sur 2.6 Tamaulipas 2.6 Oaxaca 2.5 Veracruz de Ignacio de la Llave 2.5 Yucatán 2.4 Coahuila de Zaragoza 2.1 Quintana Roo 2.0 Michoacán de Ocampo 1.9 San Luis Potosí 1.8 Chihuahua 1.8 Tabasco 1.8 Querétaro 1.7 Chiapas 1.7 Durango 1.7 Puebla 1.7 Zacatecas 1.7 Guerrero 1.6 Aguascalientes 1.2 Campeche 1.1 Baja California 1.0 Sinaloa 1.0 Guanajuato 0.9 Migración internacional en el quinquenio previo a cada censo Millones 1.6 1.2 0.285 Total Emigrante Migrante de retorno 2000 2010 Estimación del Saldo Neto Migratorio promedio anual: -145 mil Nota: Emigrantes y migrantes de retorno no suma el total, porque no se grafica el no especificado.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Climate Action Plan for the City of La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico: a Tool for Sustainability
    The Sustainable City X 439 Climate action plan for the city of La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico: a tool for sustainability A. Ivanova, A. Bermudez & A. Martinez Universidad Autonoma de Baja California Sur, Mexico Abstract As a result of its coastal location and severe water scarcity condition, the city of La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico, is extremely vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. The purpose of this paper is to present the main findings of the Climate Change Action Plan for the City of La Paz and Neighbouring Areas (PACCLAP): first, the vulnerability to climate change and the adaptation measures suggested; and second, the local greenhouse gas emissions inventory and the recommended mitigation measures. In this study the methodology specified in UNEP (2008) was applied, Methodology for Assessment: GEO Cities. Manual for Application, Version 3; UNEP (2009), Training Manual on Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change for Geo Cities, UN-Habitat (2010), Planning for Climate Change: A Resource Guide for Urban Planners and UNEP (2011) IEA Training Manual, Climate Change Vulnerability and Impact Assessment in Cities. The greenhouse gas emissions inventory (LGHGEI) was carried out following the revised 1996 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s guidelines for greenhouse gas inventories (IPCC, 1997a; IPCC, 1997b; IPCC, 1997c). The main results show that the water scarcity is the principal vulnerability for the city, followed by the sea level rise; and that the transport sector must be the priority in the mitigation strategy. The proposed climate actions (e.g. catch of surface water in dams, reduce leakage losses in the water system; efficient fuel use; and, emissions mitigation trough grid connected systems) are directly related to the Municipality Development Plan, thus making the PACCLAP a valuable instrument to support current and future decision makers in the formulation of public policies to foster the sustainability and improve the wellbeing of the local society.
    [Show full text]
  • PPS Mapa De México
    Desarrollo de PPS en gobiernos estatales Aguascalientes Reformas al Marco Jurídico Baja California Sur Campeche Chiapas Coahuila Estados con Reformas al Marco Jurídico Distrito Federal Durango Estados sin Reformas Estado de México al Marco Jurídico Guanajuato Jalisco Michoacán Morelos Nayarit Nuevo León Oaxaca Puebla Sonora Tabasco Tamaulipas Veracruz Yucatán Zacatecas Cámara Mexicana de la Industria de la Construcción Desarrollo de PPS en gobiernos estatales Aguascalientes Reformas al Marco Jurídico Baja California Sur Campeche Aguascalientes Chiapas Coahuila Reforma Constitucional: Sí Distrito Federal Tipo: Reforma PPS. Durango Estado de México Sectores: Educación. Guanajuato Jalisco Observaciones: Adicionalmente, hubo reformas a la Ley de Michoacán Presupuesto, a la Ley de Deuda y a Morelos la Ley de Obras Públicas. Nayarit Nuevo León Oaxaca Puebla Sonora Tabasco Tamaulipas Veracruz Yucatán Zacatecas Cámara Mexicana de la Industria de la Construcción Desarrollo de PPS en gobiernos estatales Aguascalientes Reformas al Marco Jurídico Baja California Sur Campeche Chiapas Coahuila Distrito Federal Durango Estado de México Guanajuato Jalisco Michoacán Morelos Nayarit Baja California Sur Nuevo León Reforma Constitucional: Sí Oaxaca Puebla Tipo: Reforma Parcial. Sonora Sectores: Pendiente. Tabasco Tamaulipas Observaciones: Veracruz Adicionalmente hubo Yucatán reformas a la Ley de Adquisiciones y a la Ley Zacatecas de Presupuesto. Cámara Mexicana de la Industria de la Construcción Desarrollo de PPS en gobiernos estatales Aguascalientes Reformas
    [Show full text]
  • Range Expansion of the Whitenose Shark, Nasolamia Velox, and Migratory Movements to the Oceanic Revillagigedo Archipelago
    Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, page 1 of 5. # Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 2017 doi:10.1017/S0025315417000108 Range expansion of the whitenose shark, Nasolamia velox, and migratory movements to the oceanic Revillagigedo Archipelago (west Mexico) frida lara-lizardi1,2, mauricio hoyos-padilla2,3, james t. ketchum2,4 and felipe galva’ n-magan~a1 1Instituto Polite´cnico Nacional, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, Av. IPN s/n. C.P. 23096. La Paz, B.C.S, Mexico, 2Pelagios-Kakunja´ A. C. 1540 Sinaloa, C.P. 23070, La Paz, B.C.S., Mexico, 3Fins Attached, 19675 Still Glen Way, Colorado Springs, CO 80908, USA, 4Centro de Investigaciones Biolo´gicas del Noroeste, Playa Palo de Santa Rita Sur, 23096 La Paz, B.C.S, Mexico Current literature considers that Nasolamia velox has a limited distribution along the coastline of the Eastern Pacific with sporadic sightings in the Galapagos Archipelago. This study provides evidence of the occurrence of this species at the Revillagigedo Archipelago (18899′186′′N 112808′44′′W), Mexico, using acoustic telemetry and videos taken from 2014 to 2016. We report here movements from a coastal location (National Park Cabo Pulmo) to a group of oceanic islands (Revillagigedo Archipelago) by one single individual, supporting the idea of the potential connectivity of sharks between the Gulf of California and the Revillagigedo Archipelago. This report extends the known distribution of N. velox to 400 km off the mainland coast of the Americas, thereby increasing the knowledge of the distribution of a species commonly reported in fishery landings of the Eastern Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Economic Report January – March 2019 Summary
    Banco de México Regional Economic Report January – March 2019 Summary During the first quarter of 2019, economic activity in a decline in retail trade in the Central region and a fall in Mexico contracted as compared to the previous the construction sector in the North-Central region. quarter, deepening the weakness observed in late 2018. During the period January – March 2019, average This evolution was due to both the moderation of the annual headline inflation declined as compared to the global economic rate of growth and a greater weakness last quarter of 2018, just as anticipated, while core of domestic demand, which heightened due to certain inflation lied slightly above expected figures. Indeed, transitory factors that took place at different moments the decrease in annual headline inflation was mainly of the reported period, such as the fuel shortage, the caused by the fall in its non-core component. On the blocking of railways in Michoacán and labor conflicts in other hand, core inflation remained above 3.50%, it rose Tamaulipas. In particular, manufacturing exports in April, even after controlling for seasonal effects, and continued to decelerate during the first quarter of 2019. within it, the price variations of different services and Nevertheless, despite the recovery of investment in food merchandise were adjusted upwards. The decline January 2019 due to exclusively the performance of in non-core inflation was largely related to the lower some components, for the remainder of the quarter it is growth of energy prices, while certain fuel prices were expected to have remained weak. Since late 2018 and adjusted at a lower rate than their international early 2019, private consumption has registered an references.
    [Show full text]
  • Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa Alan B
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 29 | Issue 1 Article 4 2011 Plants of the Colonet Region, Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa Alan B. Harper Terra Peninsular, Coronado, California Sula Vanderplank Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, California Mark Dodero Recon Environmental Inc., San Diego, California Sergio Mata Terra Peninsular, Coronado, California Jorge Ochoa Long Beach City College, Long Beach, California Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Harper, Alan B.; Vanderplank, Sula; Dodero, Mark; Mata, Sergio; and Ochoa, Jorge (2011) "Plants of the Colonet Region, Baja California, Mexico, and a Vegetation Map of Colonet Mesa," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 29: Iss. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol29/iss1/4 Aliso, 29(1), pp. 25–42 ’ 2011, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden PLANTS OF THE COLONET REGION, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MEXICO, AND A VEGETATION MAPOF COLONET MESA ALAN B. HARPER,1 SULA VANDERPLANK,2 MARK DODERO,3 SERGIO MATA,1 AND JORGE OCHOA4 1Terra Peninsular, A.C., PMB 189003, Suite 88, Coronado, California 92178, USA ([email protected]); 2Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 1500 North College Avenue, Claremont, California 91711, USA; 3Recon Environmental Inc., 1927 Fifth Avenue, San Diego, California 92101, USA; 4Long Beach City College, 1305 East Pacific Coast Highway, Long Beach, California 90806, USA ABSTRACT The Colonet region is located at the southern end of the California Floristic Province, in an area known to have the highest plant diversity in Baja California.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico: State Law on Legitimation and Distinctions Between Children Born in and out of Wedlock
    Report for the Executive Office for Immigration Review LL Files Nos. 2017-014922 through 2017-014953 Mexico: State Law on Legitimation and Distinctions Between Children Born In and Out of Wedlock (Update) August 2017 The Law Library of Congress, Global Legal Research Center (202) 707-6462 (phone) • (866) 550-0442 (fax) • [email protected] • http://www.law.gov Contents Introduction .....................................................................................................................................1 Aguascalientes .................................................................................................................................2 Baja California .................................................................................................................................4 Baja California Sur ..........................................................................................................................6 Campeche .........................................................................................................................................8 Chiapas ...........................................................................................................................................10 Chihuahua ......................................................................................................................................12 Coahuila .........................................................................................................................................14 Colima ............................................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico States: Federal and Local Traffic Light Statuses September 27, 2020 to October 11, 2020
    Mexico States: Federal and Local Traffic Light Statuses September 27, 2020 to October 11, 2020 STATE FEDERAL LOCAL LOCAL LINK Aguascalientes https://www.aguascalientes.gob.mx/coronavirus/ YELLOW Baja California http://www.bajacalifornia.gob.mx/coronavirus YELLOW ORANGE https://twitter.com/Jaime_BonillaV/status/1310618244324048904 Baja California Sur https://coronavirus.bcs.gob.mx/ ORANGE Campeche http://www.campeche.salud.gob.mx/ GREEN Chiapas http://coronavirus.saludchiapas.gob.mx/ YELLOW Chihuahua http://saluddigital.ssch.gob.mx/covid/ YELLOW YELLOW – Chihuahua Region YELLOW – Juarez Region Ciudad de Mexico https://semaforo.covid19.cdmx.gob.mx/tablero/ ORANGE Coahuila http://www.saludcoahuila.gob.mx/COVID19/ YELLOW Colima http://www.saludcolima.gob.mx/coronavirus/ ORANGE Durango http://covid.durango.gob.mx/ YELLOW Estado de Mexico http://salud.edomex.gob.mx/salud/covid ORANGE https://twitter.com/SaludEdomex/status/1309512100386082821 Guanajuato https://reactivemosgto.guanajuato.gob.mx/ YELLOW ORANGE Guerrero http://guerrero.gob.mx/transparencia/panorama-estatal-covid-19/ ORANGE https://twitter.com/HectorAstudillo/status/1305544882627387405 Hidalgo ORANGE http://coronavirus.hidalgo.gob.mx/ Jalisco https://coronavirus.jalisco.gob.mx/ ORANGE Michoacan https://michoacancoronavirus.com/ ORANGE Morelos http://salud.morelos.gob.mx/pdf/situacion-actual-2020 YELLOW Nayarit https://covid19.nayarit.gob.mx ORANGE Nuevo Leon https://www.nl.gob.mx/publicaciones/casos-de-covid-19-en-nuevo-leon ORANGE Oaxaca https://coronavirus.oaxaca.gob.mx/ YELLOW
    [Show full text]
  • Baja California Sur Tourism Cluster in Mexico
    MICROECONOMICS OF COMPETITIVENESS THE BAJA CALIFORNIA SUR TOURISM CLUSTER IN MEXICO Professor Michael E. Porter Professor Niels Ketelhöhn Mulegué Loreto Comondú Los Cabos municipality La Paz San Jose del Cabo Cabo Corridor Cabo San Lucas Daniel Acevedo (Mexico) Dionisio Garza Sada (Mexico) José Luis Romo (Mexico) Bernardo Vogel (Mexico) Boston, Massachusetts May 2nd, 2008 Profile of Mexico Mexico covers an area of 1,964,382 square kilometers (758,452 square miles). With a population of 105 million, Mexico is the 11th most populous country and the most populous Spanish-speaking country in the world. The nation’s capital, Mexico City, is the second largest city in the world. Mexico is composed by 31 states congregated in a federal representative democratic republic. The constitution establishes three levels of government: federal, state, and municipal. The federal government is constituted by the Legislative branch, composed by the Senate and the Chamber of Deputies, the Executive branch, headed by the President who is elected for a single term every six years by a direct national election and is also commander in chief of the military forces, and the Judicial branch, comprised by the Supreme Court.1 Recent Political and Economic Situation The economic policy from 1920 until the end of the 1980’s was based on a centralized economy driven by strong government intervention. During the 1950´s postwar years, Mexico pursued an economic development strategy of “stabilizing development” that relied on heavy public-sector investment to modernize the national economy. Concurrently, Mexican governments followed conservative policies on controlled interest and exchange rates that helped maintain low rates of inflation and attracted external capital to support industrialization.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Gives Recognition to Baja California As Boophilus Spp
    The United States gives recognition to Baja California as Boophilus spp. tick-free The measure allows producers to export live cattle with less restrictions. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) gave recognition to Baja California as a boophilus spp. (Rhipicephalus) tick-free zone, which will allow bovine cattle producers to export live animals more easily. The recognition was granted by the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), following the request made in the first quarter of 2019 by the National Service for Agro-Alimentary Public Health, Safety and Quality (SENASICA). The US health agency conducted various analyzes and concluded that ruminants imported from the region represent a low risk for American cattle. The APHIS establishes regulations on the importation of certain animals to prevent the introduction of cattle transmissible diseases. The regulations establish the procedure to request recognition of the animal health status of a region or for the approval of the export of a particular type of animal or product to the US. The APHIS evaluates the applications and, if it considers that the recognition can be granted, it submits its evaluation for public consultation –by means of a notice that is published in its Federal Register. Once the consultation is finished, the health authority reviews the comments and makes a final determination. In the case of the declaration made for Baja California, the APHIS published the request of the agency of the Secretariat of Agriculture and Rural Development (SADER) last March 19th, and requested comments for a period of 60 days. Given that it did not receive any comments, it communicated to SENASICA its determination to add the entity to the list of regions of Mexico declared as free of ticks.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Birds and Conservation Priorities in Baja California Peninsula1
    Terrestrial Birds and Conservation Priorities in Baja California Peninsula1 Ricardo Rodríguez-Estrella2 ________________________________________ Abstract The Baja California peninsula has been categorized as as the Nautical Ladder that will have impacts at the an Endemic Bird Area of the world and it is an im- regional level on the biodiversity. Proposals for portant wintering area for a number of aquatic, wading research and conservation action priorities are given for and migratory landbird species. It is an important area the conservation of birds and their habitats throughout for conservation of bird diversity in northwestern the Peninsula of Baja California. México. In spite of this importance, only few, scattered studies have been done on the ecology and biology of bird species, and almost no studies exist for priority relevant species such as endemics, threatened and other key species. The diversity of habitats and climates Introduction permits the great resident landbird species richness throughout the Peninsula, and also explains the pre- The Baja California peninsula is an important area for sence of an important number of landbird migrant conservation of bird diversity in northwestern México species. Approximately 140 resident and 65 migrant (CCA 1999, Arizmendi and Marquez 2000). It has landbird species have been recorded for Baja California been classified as an Endemic Bird Area of the world state (BCN) and 120 resident and 55 landbird migrant (Stattersfield et al. 1998) and also has been considered species for Baja California Sur state (BCS). Three ter- as an important wintering area for a number of aquatic, restrial endemics have been recognized for BCN and wading and migratory landbird species (Massey and four endemics for BCS.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOGRAFÍA NACIONAL Sifeis Concaynt
    SIFeIS CONCAyNT GEOGRAFÍA NACIONAL SIFeIS CONCAyNT GUÍA DE ESTUDIOS DE GEOGRAFÍA NACIONAL Un agradecimiento especial al Co. FRANCISCO HERNANDEZ JUAREZ por la oportunidad y el apoyo para realizar este trabajo, así como a los integrantes de la CONCAyNT y a todos los que participaron en esto. RICARDO ROCHA LAURA GURIDI LUIS ESCOBAR DANIEL MORENO JUAN RODRIGUEZ SIFeIS CONCAyNT TEMARIO • DIVISIÓN POLÍTICA DE LA REPÚBLICA MEXICANA • OROGRAFÍA • HIDROGRAFÍA • CIUDADES IMPORTANTES Y SUS CONLINDANCIAS Recuerda que contarás con 30 minutos para resolver 30 reactivos SIFeIS CONCAyNT UNIDAD 1 DIVISION POLITICA 1.1 ESTADOS Y SUS CAPITALES 1.2 ESTADOS POR SU UBICACION 1.3 COLINDANCIAS Es importante que tengas a la mano los mapas correspondientes a cada tema. SIFeIS CONCAyNT 1.1 ESTADOS Y SUS CAPITALES La Republica Mexicana esta dividida en 32 Entidades Federativas conformadas por: 31 Estados y 1 Distrito Federal SIFeIS CONCAyNT SIFeIS CONCAyNT A continuación encontrarás los Estados de la República Mexicana y sus Capitales ESTADOS Y CAPITALES DE MÉXICO Estado Capital Estado Capital Aguascalientes Aguascalientes* Morelos Cuernavaca Baja California Mexicali Nayarit Tepic Baja California Sur La Paz Nuevo León Monterrey Campeche Campeche* Oaxaca Oaxaca* Coahuila Saltillo Puebla Puebla* Colima Colima* Querétaro Querétaro* Chiapas Tuxtla Gutiérrez Quintana Roo Chetumal Chihuahua Chihuahua* San Luis Potosí San Luis Potosí* Distrito Federal Ciudad de México Sinaloa Culiacán Durango Durango* Sonora Hermosillo Guanajuato Guanajuato* Tabasco Villahermosa Guerrero Chilpancingo Tamaulipas Ciudad Victoria Hidalgo Pachuca Tlaxcala Tlaxcala* Jalisco Guadalajara Veracruz Jalapa México Toluca Yucatán Mérida Michoacán Morelia Zacatecas Zacatecas* * Capitales con el mismo nombre del Estado SIFeIS CONCAyNT 1.2 ESTADOS POR SU UBICACIÓN Debes saber cuales son los estados del norte, del centro, del sur, del oriente, del occidente y del sureste, de nuestro País, por lo que a continuación los enlistamos de acuerdo a su ubicación geográfica.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Futures for the Region of Loreto, Baja California Sur, Mexico
    ALTERNATIVE FUTURES FOR THE REGION OF LORETO, BAJA CALIFORNIA SUR, MEXICO Authors Carl Steinitz, Robert Faris, Juan Carlos Vargas-Moreno, Guoping Huang, Shiau-Yun Lu Harvard University Oscar Arizpe, Manuel Angeles, Fausto Santiago, Antonina Ivanova, Alba E. Gámez Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur Kathryn Baird, Thomas Maddock III, Hoori Ajami University of Arizona , NSF Science and Technology Center for Sustainability of semi-Arid Hydrology and Riparian Areas (SAHRA). Leonardo Huato, Martha J. Haro Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S.C. Michael Flaxman ESRI Paul Ganster, Angélica Villegas San Diego State University Catalina Lopez Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego In cooperation with: Municipality of Loreto, B.C.S. With the support of the International Community Foundation and its donors including the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. Additional support in kind was provided by the Hotel Association of Loreto. Harvard University Cambridge, MA USA 02138 November 17, 2005 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The study has been made possible with the support of the International Community Foundation and its donors including the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. It has benefited from the institutional support of the following organizations: Harvard University, Graduate School of Design Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur University of Arizona CIBNOR San Diego State University Scripps Institute of Oceanography Municipality of Loreto We thank the many people who participated in public meetings, responded to surveys, and provided information and advice, and the Hotel Association of Loreto for providing support. We especially thank Richard Kiy, President and CEO of the International Community Foundation, without whose efforts this study would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]