Elixir Journal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Elixir Journal 53524 Anteneh Geremew Gemeda/ Elixir Law 133 (2019) 53524-53528 Available online at www.elixirpublishers.com (Elixir International Journal) Law Elixir Law 133 (2019) 53524-53528 Essentials of the Right to Voluntary Return: The Case of Refugees Anteneh Geremew Gemeda Lecturer, School of Law, Debre Markos University, Ethiopia. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Voluntary return is the assisted or independent return to the country of origin, transit or Received: 6 June 2019; another third country based on the free will of the returnee. Voluntary return is informed Received in revised form: and unforced return of a refugee to his country of origin. Therefore, this paper is intended 7 August 2019; to deal the concept of voluntary return as a product of two main components: The right to Accepted: 17 August 2019; return and the right not to be forced to return. The latter is concerned with voluntariness of repatriation. There are various pulling and pushing factors which instigate the return Keywords of refugees to their country of origin. The return of refugees and asylum seekers may be Voluntary Return, classified as voluntary repatriation, mandatory return of rejected asylum seekers who are Refugees, required by law to leave, and forced return of rejected asylum seekers. It is dealt that UNHCR, voluntariness of returning to home country is an essential right of refugees. Non-refoulnement. © 2019 Elixir All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Refugees should be provided with complete, objective, up- It is the risk of human rights violations in their home to-date and accurate information, on physical, material and country which compels refugees to cross international borders legal safety issues regarding their former homes, lands or and seek protection abroad. However, various pulling and places where they used to live. They should be able to pushing factors instigate the return of refugees to their live in their homes again free from fear. The right to country of origin. Particularly, if conditions have return is not restricted by the passing of time and cannot be fundamentally changed in the country of origin promoting limited to a certain period of time. and monitoring the safety of their voluntary return allows For long the United Nations Higher Commissioner on refugees to re-establish themselves in their own community Refugees (UNHCR), a non-partisan, non-political and to enjoy their basic human rights. humanitarian organization responsible for the implementation The return of refugees and asylum seekers may of the 1951 Refugee Convention, consistently refused to encompass voluntary repatriation, mandatory return of accept the human right to return as the starting point for a rejected asylum seekers who are required by law to leave, and consideration of voluntary repatriation. However, since forced return of rejected asylum seekers. Definition of 1980‟s the focus of international attention is mainly on voluntary repatriation used by the European Council on voluntary repatriation and prevention of the mass exodus of Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), recommends that „„voluntary refugees and the linkage between the two has been asserted in repatriation shall be used to describe the return of Convention the international debates on the refugee problem. Thus the refugees, other persons with a complementary or temporary recent trend is towards facilitating the voluntary repatriation protection status, or persons still in the asylum procedure who of the refugees by involving both the country of refuge and freely choose to exercise their right to return to their country the country of origin and also the UNHCR. of origin or habitual residence‟. According to International 2. The Right to Return Organization of Migration (IOM), voluntary return is the The human right to return has been included in a number assisted or independent return to the country of origin, transit of universal and regional instruments. It has been advocated or another third country based on the free will of the returnee. that the human right to return forms part of customary The definition used by ECRE differs from the one used by the international law. For most individuals the actual practice of IOM, which uses the concept of voluntary repatriation to returning to one‟s home or country is so commonplace a part cover a much wider group encompassing refugees, asylum of everyday living that the right of return as a legal concept is seekers and rejected asylum seekers. For the purpose of this given little attention. The great majority of people in the paper, voluntary return is informed and unforced return of a world are able to exercise the customary right of return based refugee to his country of origin. upon state practice. Therefore, this paper is intended to deal the concept of The right to return is considered part of the right to voluntary return as a product of two main components: The freedom of movement. A general right to free movement can right to return and the right not to be forced to return. The be traced back to 16th century publicists of international law latter is concerned with voluntariness of repatriation. who had upheld this right. The Spaniard Francisco de Vitoria Voluntary repatriation is when the choice to return is said: “it was permissible from the beginning of the world for made without any pressure from any outside source and anyone to set forth and travel wheresoever he would”. where there is access to accurate information on the It is said to be particular in that “unlike many other circumstances and conditions that refugees are returning to. human rights and freedoms, its exercise does not produce Tele: E-mail address: [email protected] © 2019 Elixir All rights reserved 53525 Anteneh Geremew Gemeda/ Elixir Law 133 (2019) 53524-53528 effects only within a single State, but often affects at least two [ICCPR] and should be, in any event, reasonable in the communities, that of the country to be left and that of the particular circumstances. The Committee considers that there State to which ingress is sought”. are few, if any, circumstances in which deprivation of the While the rights to leave and return are closely right to enter one‟s own country could be reasonable. A Sate connected, in that the existence of one allows for the effective party must not, by stripping a person of nationality or by exercise of the other, they respectively respond to different expelling an individual to a third country, arbitrarily prevent needs of the individuals exercising them. The person leaving this person from returning to his or her own country. his or her country may be doing so out of a desire to travel, to In terms of the right to return, the Human Rights emigrate, or to seek refuge. The person seeking to return to Committee has also given authoritative interpretation to the his or her country is usually motivated by a desire to return meaning of the phrase „own country.‟ The Committee states home, to the place where he or she belongs, to his or her that the right applies even in relation to disputed territories, or roots. territories that have changed hands. In paragraph 20 of This „natural desire for a base or homeland‟ has been General Comment 27, the Human Rights Committee said to demonstrate „the logical connection‟ of freedom of determined that: movement with the right to a nationality, and in this sense The scope of „his own country‟ is broader than the the right to return is closely connected with the legal concept concept „country of his nationality‟. It is not limited to of nationality. Besides, the right to return can be closely nationality in a formal sense, that is, nationality acquired at linked with other human rights, such as the right to property, birth or by conferral; it embraces, at the very least, an the right to privacy and the right of admission for nationals. individual who, because of his or her special ties to or claims The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by in relation to a given country, cannot be considered to be a the UN General Assembly in 1948, is the foundation of the mere alien. This would be the case, for example, of nationals right to return in human rights law. Article 13 of the of a country who have been stripped of their nationality in Universal Declaration phrases the right to return broadly and violation of international law, and of individuals whose simply, as follows: Everyone has the right to leave any country of nationality has been incorporated in or transferred country, including his own, and to return to his country. This to another national entity, whose nationality is being denied provision recognizes the inherent relationship between a them. person and his country and is termed in unconditional Various specialized universal instruments adopted under wording. The exercise of the right, like others in the the auspices of the UN specify the provision of the Covenant Universal Declaration, is only subject under Article 29 to in different contexts. The Convention on Elimination of “such limitations as are determined by law solely for the Racial Discrimination (CERD) guarantees a right „to return to purpose of seeking due recognition and respect for the right one‟s country‟ as an aspect of a State‟s obligation to avoid of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, racial discrimination; thus a State is forbidden to deny entry public order and the general welfare in a democratic society”. to a national on racial or ethnic grounds. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 3. The Case of Refugees the instrument that was meant to give conventional binding Refugees need to be guaranteed the right to return force to many of the rights proclaimed in the Universal voluntarily and in safety to their countries of origin or Declaration, incorporates the right to return, stating in Article nationality.
Recommended publications
  • The Palestinians' Right of Return Point
    Human Rights Brief Volume 8 | Issue 2 Article 2 2001 Point: The alesP tinians' Right of Return Hussein Ibish Ali Abunimah Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/hrbrief Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Ibish, Hussein, and Ali Abunimah. "Point: The aleP stinians' Right of Return." Human Rights Brief 8, no. 2 (2001): 4, 6-7. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Human Rights Brief by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ibish and Abunimah: Point: The Palestinians' Right of Return point/ The Palestinians’ Right of Return The Controversy Over the by Hussein Ibish and Ali Abunimah* Right of Return alestinians are the largest and In 1947, after a wave of Jewish immigration, the United Nations most long-suffering refugee pop- voted to divide Palestine into Arab and Jewish sectors, with Jerusalem Pulation in the world. There are administered as an international enclave. Despite Arab opposition, more than 3.7 million Palestinians reg- istered as refugees by the United the Jews began to build their own state. On May 14, 1948, Israel Nations Relief and Work Agency declared its independence. Shortly thereafter, the War of Indepen- (UNRWA), the UN agency responsi- dence broke out when Egypt, Syria, Jordan, and Lebanon refused to ble for them.
    [Show full text]
  • I Want to Believe I Want to Believe Posadism, Ufos, and Apocalypse Communism
    I Want to Believe I Want to Believe Posadism, UFOs, and Apocalypse Communism A.M. Gittlitz First published 2020 by Pluto Press 345 Archway Road, London N6 5AA www.plutobooks.com Copyright © A.M. Gittlitz 2020 Every effort has been made to trace copyright holders and to obtain their permission for the use of copyright material in this book. The publisher apologises for any errors or omissions in this respect and would be grateful if notified of any corrections that should be incorporated in future reprints or editions. The right of A.M. Gittlitz to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 0 7453 4076 0 Hardback ISBN 978 0 7453 4077 7 Paperback ISBN 978 1 7868 0619 2 PDF eBook ISBN 978 1 7868 0621 5 Kindle eBook ISBN 978 1 7868 0620 8 EPUB eBook This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. Logging, pulping and manufacturing processes are expected to conform to the environmental standards of the country of origin. Typeset by Stanford DTP Services, Northampton, England Contents List of Illustrations vii List of Abbreviations viii Acknowledgements x Introduction 1 PART I: THE TRAGIC CENTURY 1. Commentaries on the Infancy of Comrade Posadas 19 2. Revolutionary Youth or Patriotic Youth? 24 3. The Death Throes of Capitalism 34 4. The Origins of Posadism 42 5.
    [Show full text]
  • National Strategy for Homeland Security 2007
    national strategy for HOMELAND SECURITY H OMELAND SECURITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 2 0 0 7 national strategy for HOMELAND SECURITY H OMELAND SECURITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 2 0 0 7 My fellow Americans, More than 6 years after the attacks of September 11, 2001, we remain at war with adversar- ies who are committed to destroying our people, our freedom, and our way of life. In the midst of this conflict, our Nation also has endured one of the worst natural disasters in our history, Hurricane Katrina. As we face the dual challenges of preventing terrorist attacks in the Homeland and strengthening our Nation’s preparedness for both natural and man-made disasters, our most solemn duty is to protect the American people. The National Strategy for Homeland Security serves as our guide to leverage America’s talents and resources to meet this obligation. Despite grave challenges, we also have seen great accomplishments. Working with our part- ners and allies, we have broken up terrorist cells, disrupted attacks, and saved American lives. Although our enemies have not been idle, they have not succeeded in launching another attack on our soil in over 6 years due to the bravery and diligence of many. Just as our vision of homeland security has evolved as we have made progress in the War on Terror, we also have learned from the tragedy of Hurricane Katrina. We witnessed countless acts of courage and kindness in the aftermath of that storm, but I, like most Americans, was not satisfied with the Federal response. We have applied the lessons of Katrina to thisStrategy to make sure that America is safer, stronger, and better prepared.
    [Show full text]
  • Homeland Final Season Release Date
    Homeland Final Season Release Date Sturgis is ill-conceived and creams organisationally while steric Doyle shinny and aromatised. Unbarbed and accurst Sonnie often donees some aria indistinctly or graduate tensely. Suprarenal and hoariest Giorgi lot her daisy westers coincidentally or swivelling serially, is Bogdan multivalent? Brody agrees that means her command of more dutiful spy games to date in advance of entertainment, costa ronin and admits that. Why Homeland's Final Season Has Been Delayed Until 2020. Keane is right about the last day, what had to do not install any time jump between two. Watch the Trailer for Homeland's Eighth and Final Season. The official site taking the SHOWTIME Original Series Homeland. Homeland Season on iTunes. Homeland Series-Finale Recap Season Episode 12 Vulture. Homeland Season Episode 12 Trailer Episode Guide and. We got it can i think that he was held his release date pushed back into its look back. Over they past nine years since its premiere in 2011 Homeland has always. The globe thing within that Carrie Mathison has relinquished custody of new daughter Franny who now has slight chance see some semblance of a normal childhood. Showtime's Emmy-winning espionage series Homeland readies its final season with plate new trailer that paints Carrie as a potential traitor Kevin Yeoman Dec 6. Television is finally rescued, the navy holds a russian intelligence operatives pound on. El niño and final season finale and children whom the. In August 201 it was announced that the final season will premiere in June. Now believes in afghanistan peace, brody to muslims living at the russia plot as cia to your voice dr.
    [Show full text]
  • A President's Jeremiad of Terror (Excerpts from Honors Thesis, the Rhetoric of the War on Terror: George W
    Denison Journal of Religion Volume 6 Article 6 2006 A President's Jeremiad of Terror (Excerpts from Honors Thesis, The Rhetoric of the War on Terror: George W. Bush's Transformation of the Jeremiad) Lauren Alissa Clark Denison University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.denison.edu/religion Part of the Ethics in Religion Commons, and the Sociology of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Clark, Lauren Alissa (2006) "A President's Jeremiad of Terror (Excerpts from Honors Thesis, The Rhetoric of the War on Terror: George W. Bush's Transformation of the Jeremiad)," Denison Journal of Religion: Vol. 6 , Article 6. Available at: http://digitalcommons.denison.edu/religion/vol6/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Denison Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denison Journal of Religion by an authorized editor of Denison Digital Commons. Clark: A President's Jeremiad of Terror (Excerpts from Honors Thesis, Th a president’s jeremiad of terror s both governor and president, George W. Bush has always demon- strated religious devotion in his public rhetoric. His language ap- Apears most overtly religious in the defining event of his presidency: the war on terror. Faith and public policy intertwine in Bush’s presidency, pro- viding him with “guidance and wisdom and strength” during a trying time (as qtd. in Viorst 102). God and nation unite in a mission, a mission described and mediated by the president. It is this unique aspect of Bush’s presidency, which bears examining. How does his rhetoric blur the boundaries between public and private faith, religious beliefs and public policy? How does his rhetoric unite these components in his speeches regarding the war on terror? A useful way to answer these questions is to examine his rhetoric through the form of the jeremiad.
    [Show full text]
  • G-884, Request for the Return of Original Documents
    USCIS Request for the Return of Original Documents Form G-884 Department of Homeland Security OMB No. 1615-0100 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Expires 10/31/2021 Remarks File No For Date USCIS Use Only ► START HERE - Type or print in black ink. 4. USCIS Online Account Number (if any) Part 1. Information About You (Person requesting the return of original documents) ► 5. City/Town/Village of Birth IMPORTANT NOTE: You do not need to file this request if you submitted original documents because U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) requested originals. We will 6. Country of Birth automatically return original documents that we requested once we no longer need them. Please refer to the instructions for the form you filed to determine whether non-requested original documents are available for return or destroyed after electronic 7. Date of Birth (mm/dd/yyyy) processing. 8. Provide specific information about the desired documents or records (for example, marriage license, birth certificate, Your Full Name or death certificate). 1.a. Family Name (Last Name) 1.b. Given Name (First Name) 1.c. Middle Name Mailing Address (USPS ZIP Code Lookup) 2.a. In Care Of Name 9. Receipt Number (if any) ► 2.b. Street Number and Name 2.c. Apt. Ste. Flr. Part 2. Data for Identification of Personal Record 2.d. Number Subject's Full Name 2.e. City or Town 1.a. Family Name (Last Name) 2.f. State 2.g. ZIP Code 1.b. Given Name (First Name) Other Information 1.c. Middle Name 3. Alien Registration Number (A-Number) (if any) ► A- Form G-884 10/21/19 Page 1 of 6 Part 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Mavi Vatan, "The Blue Homeland"
    APRIL 2021 Mavi Vatan, the "Blue Homeland" c The Origins, Influences and Limits of an Ambitious Doctrine for Turkey Aurélien DENIZEAU In association with: Ifri is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non-governmental, non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. Policy Center for the New South, formerly OCP Policy Center, is a Moroccan policy-oriented think tank based in Rabat, Morocco, striving to promote knowledge sharing and to contribute to an enriched reflection on key economic and international relations issues. By offering a southern perspective on major regional and global strategic challenges facing developing and emerging countries, the Policy Center for the New South aims to provide a meaningful policy-making contribution through its four research programs: Agriculture, Environment and Food Security, Economic and Social Development, Commodity Economics and Finance, Geopolitics and International Relations. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. This memorandum has been produced as part of a partnership between the Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri) and the Policy Center for the New South. ISBN : 979-10-373-0362-2 © All rights reserved, Ifri, 2021 Cover: © Admiral Cem Gürdeniz How to cite this publication: Aurélien Denizeau, “Mavi Vatan, the ‘Blue Homeland’: The Origins, Influences and Limits of an Ambitious Doctrine for Turkey”, Études de l’Ifri, Ifri, April 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Televisionweek Local Listing for the Week of November 21-27, 2015
    PRESS & DAKOTAN n FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2015 PAGE 7B TelevisionWeek Local Listing For The Week Of November 21-27, 2015 SATURDAY PRIMETIME/LATE NIGHT NOVEMBER 21, 2015 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 5:30 6:00 6:30 7:00 7:30 8:00 8:30 9:00 9:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 1:00 1:30 BROADCAST STATIONS Cook’s Girls High School Volleyball SDHSAA Class B, Final: Girls High School Volleyball SDHSAA Class Girls High School Volleyball “Eric Clapton: Live at the Royal ACL Presents: Ameri- Under- Sun Stu- Globe Trekker Trip PBS Country Teams TBA. (N) (Live) A, Final: Teams TBA. (N) (Live) SDHSAA Class AA, Final: Teams Albert Hall -- Slowhand at 70” cana Music Festival ground dio Ses- along Ruta 40 through KUSD ^ 8 ^ Å TBA. (N) (Live) (2015, Documentary) 2015 (N) sions the Andes. KTIV $ 4 $ NASCAR Racing Paid News News 4 Insider › “Free Birds” (2013) (In Stereo) Å Saturday Night Live News 4 Saturday Night Live (N) Å Extra (N) Å 1st Look House NASCAR Racing XFINITY Series: Ford Eco- Paid Pro- NBC KDLT The Big › “Free Birds” (2013) Voices of Owen Wilson. Saturday Night Live KDLT Saturday Night Live Matthew Mc- The Simp- The Simp- KDLT (Off Air) NBC boost 300. (N) (In Stereo Live) Å gram Nightly News Bang Animated. Turkeys travel back in time to avoid (In Stereo) Å News Conaughey; Adele performs. (N) (In sons sons News Å KDLT % 5 % News (N) (N) Å Theory becoming dinner.
    [Show full text]
  • The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
    THE WORLD’S LONGEST WAR - Pt 1 An Overview of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict 1 The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict - Part 1 Handout - May 19, 2021 Trouble in the East s we watch the news with its unsettling reports of the ongoing military conflict between Israeli forces and Hamas, it’s important that we keep in mind that behind all of the conflict is a long history of animus between A the Jews and Palestinians, dating centuries back. At the center of the conflict is one four-letter word: land. Both groups have staked their claim to the land of Israel, and have been fighting about it for centuries, so much so that it has morphed into one of the most volatile topics of international politics, with many countries weighing in on one side or the other. But the question remains, Whose land is it? To whom does this highly contested piece of real estate belong? For the answer, we have to go back to the very beginning . The Abrahamic Covenant In one of the first covenants made, we read of God making an agreement with Abraham to be the father of the Jewish nation. And as a part of this covenant, He references the land he would show Abraham, upon which he was to build this great nation of Jewish people. Word Check: • Genesis 12:1-3 Commentary: Notice how in verse 1, God tells Abraham to “go from his country … “to the land I will show you.” The land He’s referring to is the land of Canaan, today know as Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSLATION 3185 3 of 7 E, ,Oa^^M^E° Eiee^Ervee°E,Eee°°A SERIES NO.(S) Ser^Ce Ien,E^ UDC 599.74-5.2 0 V
    inCIDEa cl 0.• FISHERIES:AND MARINE SERVICE TranslatiOn:Series No. '3185 Research on marine mauunals by K.K. Chapskii, and (Editor). E.S. Mirchenko Original. title: ssledovaniya morskikh miekopitayushchikh From: Atlanticheskii:Nauchno-Issiedovaterskii Institut Rybnogo Khozyaistva'l Okeanografii (AtlattNIRO) (Transactions of the Atlantic Scientific Research. Institute of Fisheriep and_OceanographY), (39), : 1-344, 1971 Translated by the Translation Bureau( JNO,) Multilingual Services Division . Department of the Secretary of State of Canada DepartMent of the Eayirtùlment, YisherieS and Marine Service .Arctic Biological: Station Ste. Anne de Bellevue, 1974 • - 562 pages typescript iI DEPARTMENT OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE SECRÉTARIAT D'ÉTAT TRANSLATION BUREAU BUREAU DES TRADUCTIONS MULTILINGUAL SERVICES DIVISION DES SERVICES CANADA DIVISION MULTILINGUES TRANSLATED FROM - TRADUCTION DE INTO - EN s S 1 a n En^lish AUTHOR - AUTEUR 5; r^os i ur:^ volume. In charge of issue - K. K. Chapskii. ^.',ditor. -. E . S. r..il Cl:enkO TITLE IN ENGLISH - TITRE ANGLAIS :;esearch on I..arine ::ammals TITLE IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE (TRANSLITERATE FOREIGN CHARACTERS) TITRE EN LANGUE ETRANGERE ( TRANSCRIRE EN CARACTÉRES ROMAINS) ïsslec3ovc.niya -morskikh rnlekopitayushchikh REFERENCE IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE (NAME OF BOOK OR PUBLICATION) IN FULL. TRANSLITERATE FOREIGN CHARACTERS. REFERENCE EN LANGUE ETRANGERE (NOM DU LIVRE OU PUBLICATION), AU COMPLET, TRANSCRIRE EN CARACTÈRES ROMAINS. Atlanticheskii naucYrno-issledovrl.tel'skii institut ryno`;o lçI_^ oz,,cr ai st v^^^ i. o_s1 eano `.r ra.^^.^' i ( 1itla.nt " 1 RL Ti^udvry vypusk ^i.^.: 1X. eEFERENCE IN ENGLISH - REFERENCE EN 1NGLAIS 1^la.^itic eseG.rch ^.nsti.tl.te f or ii.sheri es s.ncl c.^ce_o,_a.-)hy (tlanti;SR ), Transactions .
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Six Going Home: Voluntary Repatriation
    The State of the World's Refugees 1993 Chapter Six Going Home: Voluntary Repatriation In 1992, UNHCR helped some 2.4 million refugees to return home – including over 1.5 million Afghans. Repatriation of the first of the 50,000 Guatemalan refugees in Mexico began in January 1993; in the rest of Central America, the process had almost been completed. By the end of April, 365,000 Cambodians had returned, and in June 1993, plans to assist 1.3 million refugees to return to Mozambique began to be implemented. Throughout 1992, an average of 46,000 refugees went back to their home countries every week – a rate unprecedented in previous years (see Annex I.8). There have been setbacks as well. In October, for example, repatriation to Angola was abruptly halted by renewed fighting. The easing of political tensions and the winding down of a number of civil conflicts have made large-scale voluntary repatriations possible. In several countries, the return of refugees is an essential part of the transition to peace, rather than simply a result of it. In Central America, long the theatre of seemingly intractable conflicts, the repatriation of Salvadorians and Nicaraguans was a key element of the political settlement that brought an end to the civil wars in both countries. Cambodian refugees in Thailand returned to their war-torn country in time to participate in the national elections held in May 1993. The repatriation of Namibian refugees in 1989 was not only one of the fruits of the political settlement that resulted in independence, but also played a role in the process of national consolidation.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper Series University of Oxford Queen Elizabeth House International Development Centre University of Oxford
    RSC Working Paper No. 16 When Forced Migrants Return ‘Home’: The Psychosocial Difficulties Returnees Encounter in the Reintegration Process Tania Ghanem October 2003 This paper was originally submitted in June 2003 in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Forced Migration at the Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford Working Paper Series University of Oxford Queen Elizabeth House International Development Centre University of Oxford. The RSC Working Paper Series is intended to aid the rapid distribution of work in progress, research findings and special lectures by researchers and associates of the RSC. Papers aim to stimulate discussion among the worldwide community of scholars, policymakers and practitioners. They are distributed free of charge in PDF format via the RSC website. Bound hard copies of the working papers may also be purchased from the RSC. The opinions expressed in the papers are solely those of the author/s who retain the copyright. They should not be attributed to the project funders or the Refugee Studies Centre, Queen Elizabeth House or the University of Oxford. Comments on individual Working Papers are welcomed, and should be directed to the author/s. Refugee Studies Centre Queen Elizabeth House University of Oxford 21 St. Giles Oxford OX1 3LA United Kingdom Tel +44 (0)1865 270722 Fax +44 (0)1865 270721 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.rsc.ox.ac.uk ABSTRACT 3 I. INTRODUCTION 4 II. SCOPE OF THE STUDY 7 III. HISTORICAL, POLITICAL AND IDEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND ON VOLUNTARY REPATRIATION 9 1) HISTORICAL AND POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT OF VOLUNTARY REPATRIATION AS THE BEST DURABLE SOLUTION TO REFUGEES’ DISPLACEMENT 9 2) PRACTICAL AND OPERATIONAL LIMITATIONS TO THE STUDY ON REPATRIATION AND THE EMERGENCE OF POST-RETURN ASSISTANCE 12 3) UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY’S CURRENT ATTITUDES TOWARDS VOLUNTARY REPATRIATION 14 IV.
    [Show full text]