Recording Areas of Great Britain David K
Recording areas of Great Britain David K. Ballance and A. Judith Smith Migrating Turnstones Arenaria interpres and a Dunlin Calidris alpina crossing an inland county boundary Alan Harris t has recently become apparent that there always stronger than bureaucrats assume, and are some confusions and anomalies in the we have to recognise that some areas may for Iway that national journals and organisa- years continue to be claimed by both new and tions are reporting records received from original ‘owners’, whatever centralisers may County Recorders or taken from published propose. sources. Examples of the problem can be seen The main problems are in the London area, in a recent Ibis paper on the British List around the borders of Yorkshire, and in North (Dudley et al. 2006). We have, therefore, and South Wales. Others arise from the use of attempted to produce a definitive list of the titles of Metropolitan Counties, Scottish Recording Areas which will be acceptable to Regions and Districts, and other (often national and local authorities and which can be ephemeral) creations, of which some actively generally recognised. It is our intention to survive in ornithology (e.g. Avon, Greater describe current practice, not to suggest correc- Manchester), while others have never been used tions or improvements, except in some details for recording or have not been universally of presentation. accepted (e.g. Tyne & Wear, North and South The list incorporates all Recording Areas and Humberside, Strathclyde). relates them to old and new County, Regional The system of Watsonian Vice-counties, and Unitary Authority boundaries, and (except invented in 1852 for botanists and still widely in Scotland) to Watsonian Vice-counties.
[Show full text]