DOCSLIB.ORG

Suwannee River Mercury TMDL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Suwannee River Mercury TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load for Total Mercury in the Suwannee Watershed, GA February 28, 2002 TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) DEVELOPMENT For Total Mercury In the Suwannee Watershed Including Listed Segments of the Suwannee River: Suwannee Canal - Okefenokee Swamp Suwannee River Mainstem: Suwannee Canal to State Line Total Maximum Daily Load for Total Mercury in the Suwannee Watershed, GA February 28, 2002 TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) Total Mercury in Fish Tissue Residue In the In the Suwannee River Watershed Under the authority of Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., as amended by the Water Quality Act of 1987, P.L. 100-4, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is hereby establishing a TMDL for total mercury for the protection of public health associated with the consumption of fish taken from the following segments of the Suwannee River in Georgia: Suwannee Canal - Okefenokee Swamp Suwannee River Mainstem: Suwannee Canal to State Line The calculated allowable load of mercury that may come into the identified segments of the Suwannee River without exceeding the applicable water quality standard is 2.6 kilograms per year. The applicable water quality standard is the State of Georgia’s numeric interpretation of their narrative water quality standard for protection of human health from toxic substances. This interpretation indicates that the consumption of fish by the general population is not to exceed 0.3 mg/kg mercury in fish tissue. Based on a current estimated loading of 6.1 kilograms per year, an estimated 58% reduction in mercury loading is needed for the identified sections of the Suwannee River to meet the applicable water quality standard of 2.8 nanograms per liter (ng/l). This TMDL shall become effective immediately, and is incorporated into the Continuing Planning Process for the State of Georgia under Sections 303(d)(2) and 303(e) of the Clean Water Act. Signed this _________ day of___________, 2002. _____________________________ Beverly H. Banister, Director Water Management Division ii Total Maximum Daily Load for Total Mercury in the Suwannee Watershed, GA February 28, 2002 Table of Contents 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................. 1 2. Phased Approach to the TMDL .............................................................................................. 1 2.1. Phased Approach to Atmospheric Sources ..................................................................... 2 2.2. Phased Approach to Water Point Sources ...................................................................... 2 3. Problem Definition.................................................................................................................. 4 4. Applicable Water Quality Standard ........................................................................................ 5 5. TMDL Target .......................................................................................................................... 6 6. Background ............................................................................................................................. 7 6.1. Source Assessment.......................................................................................................... 9 6.2. Watershed Background Load........................................................................................ 10 6.2.1. RELMAP Mercury Deposition Rates ..................................................................10 6.2.2. Mercury Deposition Network ..............................................................................12 6.3. Available Monitoring Data ........................................................................................... 13 6.3.1. EPA Region 4 Data..............................................................................................14 6.3.2. Water Column Data .............................................................................................14 6.3.3. Sediment/Soil Data ..............................................................................................15 6.3.4. Fish Tissue Data...................................................................................................15 7. Numeric Targets and Sources - Model Development ........................................................... 16 7.1. Watershed Hydrologic and Sediment Loading Model.................................................. 16 7.2. Water Quality Fate and Transport Model ..................................................................... 17 8. Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)................................................................................... 18 8.1. Critical Condition Determination ................................................................................. 18 8.2. Seasonal Variation ........................................................................................................ 18 8.3. Margin of Safety ........................................................................................................... 18 9. TMDL Development............................................................................................................. 19 9.1. Model Results ............................................................................................................... 19 iii Total Maximum Daily Load for Total Mercury in the Suwannee Watershed, GA February 28, 2002 9.1.1. Nonpoint Source ..................................................................................................19 9.1.2. Water Quality Model ...........................................................................................21 9.2. TMDL Determination ................................................................................................... 24 10. Allocation of Loads........................................................................................................... 25 10.1. Atmospheric Reductions............................................Error! Bookmark not defined. 10.2. Allocation to NPDES Point Sources..........................Error! Bookmark not defined. 10.3. Implementation ..........................................................Error! Bookmark not defined. 10.4. State and Federal Responsibility................................Error! Bookmark not defined. 11. References......................................................................................................................... 35 12. Appendix A. Analysis of Atmospheric Deposition of Mercury........................................ 37 iv Total Maximum Daily Load for Total Mercury in the Suwannee Watershed, GA February 28, 2002 Table of Figures Figure 1 Suwannee Watershed........................................................................................................ 7 Figure 2 Suwannee Watershed Delineation.................................................................................... 8 Figure 3 Suwannee Watershed Landuses........................................................................................ 9 Figure 4 Mercury Dry Deposition Rates as Reported in the Mercury Report to Congress........... 11 Figure 5 Mercury Wet Deposition Rates as Reported in the Mercury Report to Congress.......... 12 Figure 6 Mercury Deposition Network Sampling Locations ........................................................ 13 Figure 7 Suwannee Watershed Sample Locations........................................................................ 14 Figure 8 Mercury Load Distribution ............................................................................................. 21 v Total Maximum Daily Load for Total Mercury in the Suwannee Watershed, GA February 28, 2002 Table of Tables Table 1 Georgia Department of Natural Resources Fish Consumption Guideline......................... 4 Table 2 Permitted Facilities in Suwannee Watershed................................................................... 10 Table 3 Water Column Mercury Concentrations.......................................................................... 15 Table 4 Sediment/Soil Mercury Concentrations........................................................................... 15 Table 5 Fish Tissue Mercury Data................................................................................................ 16 Table 6 Annual Average Total Mercury Load from each Sub Basin............................................ 20 Table 7 Specified and Calculated Reaction Rates and Coefficients ............................................. 22 Table 8 Flows, Depths, Velocities and Volumes used in WASP Model...................................... 23 Table 9 Predicted and Observed Mercury Concentrations under Annual Average Load and Flow24 Table 10 NPDES Permitted Facilities........................................................................................... 28 vi Total Maximum Daily Load for Total Mercury in the Suwannee Watershed, GA February 28, 2002 1. Introduction The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 4 is proposing this Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for total mercury for two listed segments of the Suwannee River Basin. The listed segments are as follows: · Suwannee Canal - Okefenokee Swamp · Suwannee River Mainstem: Suwannee Canal to State Line These segments are included on the State of Georgia’s 2000 Section 303(d) list of impaired waters because mercury in certain species of fish tissue exceeds the Georgia Department of Natural Resources
Load more

Recommended publications
  • List of TMDL Implementation Plans with Tmdls Organized by Basin
    Latest 305(b)/303(d) List of Streams List of Stream Reaches With TMDLs and TMDL Implementation Plans - Updated June 2011 Total Maximum Daily Loadings TMDL TMDL PLAN DELIST BASIN NAME HUC10 REACH NAME LOCATION VIOLATIONS TMDL YEAR TMDL PLAN YEAR YEAR Altamaha 0307010601 Bullard Creek ~0.25 mi u/s Altamaha Road to Altamaha River Bio(sediment) TMDL 2007 09/30/2009 Altamaha 0307010601 Cobb Creek Oconee Creek to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Cobb Creek Oconee Creek to Altamaha River FC 2012 Altamaha 0307010601 Milligan Creek Uvalda to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 2006 Altamaha 0307010601 Milligan Creek Uvalda to Altamaha River FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Oconee Creek Headwaters to Cobb Creek DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Oconee Creek Headwaters to Cobb Creek FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010602 Ten Mile Creek Little Ten Mile Creek to Altamaha River Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010602 Ten Mile Creek Little Ten Mile Creek to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010603 Beards Creek Spring Branch to Altamaha River Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010603 Five Mile Creek Headwaters to Altamaha River Bio(sediment) TMDL 2007 09/30/2009 Altamaha 0307010603 Goose Creek U/S Rd. S1922(Walton Griffis Rd.) to Little Goose Creek FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010603 Mushmelon Creek Headwaters to Delbos Bay Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010604 Altamaha River Confluence of Oconee and Ocmulgee Rivers to ITT Rayonier
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Regionally Important Resources Plan Regionally Important Resources 2011 1
    2011 Regionally Important Resources Plan Regionally Important Resources 2011 1 REGIONALLY IMPORTANT RESOURCES PLAN Southern Georgia July 2011 Prepared by: Valdosta Office 327 West Savannah Avenue Valdosta, GA 31601 Phone: 229.333.5277 Fax: 229.333.5312 Waycross Office 1725 S. GA Parkway, W. Waycross, GA 31503 Phone: 912.285.6097 Fax: 912.285.6126 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary The Purpose The Process The Plan Identification of Resources Introduction Background Designation of Regionally Important Resources Methodology and Process Nomination and Evaluation Research and Data Collection Criteria for Determining Value of RIR Identification of Vulnerability of RIR Stakeholder Review Regionally Important Resources Map Value Matrix Vulnerability Matrix Resource Narrative: Historic & Cultural Resources Resource Narrative: Areas of Conservation & Recreational Value Appendices Appendix A: Stakeholder List Appendix B: Regionally Important Resources Nomination Form Appendix C: List of Regionally Important Resources Appendix D: Regional Resource Plan Briefings and Presentations Appendix E: References 3 Regionally Important Resources Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE PURPOSE Pursuant to Rules of the Department of Community Affairs, Chapter 110-12-4, Regionally Important Resources are defined as “Any natural or cultural resource area identified for protection by a Regional Commission following the minimum requirements established by the Department.” The Regional Resource Plan is designed to: Enhance the focus on protection and management of important natural and cultural resources in the Southern Georgia Region. Provide for careful consideration of, and planning for, impacts of new development on these important resources. Improve local, regional, and state level coordination in the protection and management of identified resources. THE PROCESS The public nomination process resulted in twenty—one nominations from local governments, non-profit agencies, and private citizens.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of GATWS 1973-2010
    HISTORY of the GEORGIA CHAPTER OF THE WILDLIFE SOCIETY Established April 30, 1973 Semi-Annual Programs, Other Accomplishments, & Boards & Committees • MISSION: The Georgia Chapter of The Wildlife Society (Georgia TWS) is a professional organization dedicated to the scientific conservation of wildlife resources, and to furthering the education of those involved with, or interested in, wildlife conservation. Georgia TWS promotes rigorous professional ethics for wildlife scientists and managers, facilitates the exchange of technical information, and works to influence legislation impacting wildlife resources. Issue statements are developed, often in partnership with other conservation groups, and relayed to elected representatives of the Georgia and United States Constitutions and other people. • MEMBERSHIP: Georgia TWS has recently comprised of over 200 members representing universities, state, and federal agencies, conservation organizations, and the general public. Some members are involved with wildlife management in a professional capacity, while others are involved simply because of their interest in wild animals and the management of these species and their habitats. The Chapter officers function as the Executive Committee, and most of the organization's business is conducted via that body, with input from the general membership. However, there are numerous opportunities for non-elected members to contribute to the Chapter. • MEETINGS: Georgia TWS meets twice per year, spring and fall, in various locations around the state. Occasionally we meet jointly with other state chapters or other organizations. Meetings generally span two days, and feature presentations detailing current issues in wildlife research, management, and legislation. The meetings also address Chapter business, and a new crop of officers is elected at the spring meeting every two years.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Integrated 305(B)
    2018 Integrated 305(b)/303(d) List - Streams Reach Name/ID Reach Location/County River Basin/ Assessment/ Cause/ Size/Unit Category/ Notes Use Data Provider Source Priority Alex Creek Mason Cowpen Branch to Altamaha Not Supporting DO 3 4a TMDL completed DO 2002. Altamaha River GAR030701060503 Wayne Fishing 1,55,10 NP Miles Altamaha River Confluence of Oconee and Altamaha Supporting 72 1 TMDL completed TWR 2002. Ocmulgee Rivers to ITT Rayonier GAR030701060401 Appling, Wayne, Jeff Davis Fishing 1,55 Miles Altamaha River ITT Rayonier to Penholoway Altamaha Assessment 20 3 TMDL completed TWR 2002. More data need to Creek Pending be collected and evaluated before it can be determined whether the designated use of Fishing is being met. GAR030701060402 Wayne Fishing 10,55 Miles Altamaha River Penholoway Creek to Butler Altamaha Supporting 27 1 River GAR030701060501 Wayne, Glynn, McIntosh Fishing 1,55 Miles Beards Creek Chapel Creek to Spring Branch Altamaha Not Supporting Bio F 7 4a TMDL completed Bio F 2017. GAR030701060308 Tattnall, Long Fishing 4 NP Miles Beards Creek Spring Branch to Altamaha Altamaha Not Supporting Bio F 11 4a TMDL completed Bio F in 2012. River GAR030701060301 Tattnall Fishing 1,55,10,4 NP, UR Miles Big Cedar Creek Griffith Branch to Little Cedar Altamaha Assessment 5 3 This site has a narrative rank of fair for Creek Pending macroinvertebrates. Waters with a narrative rank of fair will remain in Category 3 until EPD completes the reevaluation of the metrics used to assess macroinvertebrate data. GAR030701070108 Washington Fishing 59 Miles Big Cedar Creek Little Cedar Creek to Ohoopee Altamaha Not Supporting DO, FC 3 4a TMDLs completed DO 2002 & FC (2002 & 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 2003 Refuge Manager^ / Rjmige Supervisor, Area III Date Date Chiefof Refuges Date
    REVIEW AND APPROVALS OKEFENOKEE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE FOLKSTON, GEORGIA ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 2003 Refuge Manager^ / Date Rjmige Supervisor, Area III Date Chiefof Refuges Date TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION iii HIGHLIGHTS iv CLIMATIC CONDITIONS v MONITORING AND STUDIES 1 l.a. Surveys and Censuses 1 l.b. Studies and Investigation 12 HABITAT RESTORATION 15 2.a. Wetland Restoration: On-refuge 15 2.b. Upland Restoration: On-refuge 15 2.c. Wetland Restoration: Off-refuge 15 2.d. Upland Restoration: Off-refuge 15 HABITAT MANAGEMENT 16 3.a. Water Level Management .' 16 3.b. Moist Soil Management 19 3.c. Graze/Mow/Hay 19 3.d. Farming 19 3.e. Forest Management 19 3.f. Fire Management 26 3.g. Control Pest Plants 33 FISH AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT 35 4.a. Bird Banding 35 4.b. Disease Monitoring and Treatment 35 4.c. Reintroductions 35 4.d. Nest Structures 35 4.e. Pest, Predator and Exotic Animal Control 35 COORDINATION ACTIVITIES 36 5.a. Interagency Coordination 36 5.b. Tribal Coordination 36 5.c. Private Land Activities (excluding restoration) 36 5.d. Oil and Gas Activities 36 5.e. Cooperative/Friends Organizations 36 RESOURCE PROTECTION 38 6.a. Law Enforcement 38 6.b. Wildfire Preparedness 39 6.c. Permits & Economic Use Management 39 6.d. Contaminant Investigation and Cleanup 39 6.e. Water Rights Management 40 6.f. Cultural Resource Management 40 6.g. Federal Facility Compliancy Act 40 6.h. Land Acquisition 40 6.i. Wilderness and Natural Areas 40 6.j. Threats and Conflicts 40 ALASKA ONLY 41 PUBLIC EDUCATION AND RECREATION 42 8.a.
    [Show full text]
  • The Georgia Historical Society Subject Vertical File Index the GHS
    The Georgia Historical Society Subject Vertical File Index The GHS Subject Vertical File Index is a guide to the contents of the Subject vertical files maintain by GHS. Vertical files contain newspaper clippings, journal articles, and various published and un-published resources about a particular subject. Folder titles appear in a capital letters. Vertical files are accessible in the GHS library and archives reading room. N NAMES, GEOGRAPHICAL Narroway Baptist Church request DALLAS, GA Nashville, CSS request SHIPS - MISCELLANEOUS NASHVILLE, GA NATHANS, GA National Audubon Society request AIR POLLUTION National Bank of Savannah request BANKS - SAVANNAH - MISC. National Gypsum company request INDUSTRY - SAVANNAH - MISC. (folder 1) NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES National Society Magna Charta Dames request SOCIETIES AND CLUBS - MISC. The National Society of the Colonial Dames of America request SOCIETIES AND CLUBS - COLONIAL DAMES Nativity of Our Lady Church request DARIEN, GA Nativity of Our Lord Catholic Church request CHURCHES-SAVANNAH--CATHOLIC NAVAL STORES Neal Blun request BUSINESS ENTERPRISES - SAVANNAH, GA – MISC. NEIGHBORHOODS NEIGHBORHOODS – SAVANNAH- ARDSLEY PARK 11/16/2007 The Georgia Historical Society Subject Vertical File Index BALDWIN PARK BEACH INSTITUTE BENJAMIN VAN CLARK CHATHAM CRESECENT CUYLER-BROWNSVILLE GORDONSTON SANDFLY THOMAS SQUARE New Echota, GA request INDIANS - CHEROKEE NEW GOETTINGEN, GA New Inverness, GA request DARIEN, GA NEWNAN, GA NEWSPAPERS -- GENERAL GEORGIA SAVANNAH NEWTON, GA Nicholsonboro, GA request WHITE BLUFF, GA Nightingale Garden (Savannah) request GARDENS Night in Old Savannah request FESTIVALS AND FAIRS North Georgia College (Dahlonega, GA ) request COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES - GEORGIA – MISC. North Salem Baptist church request EFFINGHAM COUNTY, GA Northeastern Railroad request RAILROADS - SHORT LINES - NORTHEASTERN NUMISMATICS NURSES AND NURSING NURSING HOMES request also AGED CARE 11/16/2007 The Georgia Historical Society Subject Vertical File Index O Oakland Cemetery request ATLANTA, GA - MISC.
    [Show full text]
  • Review and Approvals Okefenokee National
    s REVIEW AND APPROVALS OKEFENOKEE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE FOLKSTON, GEORGIA ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1993 ate INTRODUCTION The Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge is situated in the southeastern Georgia counties of Ware, Charlton and Clinch and northeastern Florida's Baker County . The refuge was established by Executive Order in 1937 and consists presently of 395,080 acres . The primary purpose of the refuge is to protect the ecological system of the 438,000-acre Okefenokee Swamp . Approximately 371,000 acres of the Okefenokee Swamp wetlands are incorporated into the refuge, and 353,981 acres within the swamp were designed as wilderness by the Okefenokee Wilderness Act of 1974 . In 1986, the Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge was designated by the Wetlands Convention as a Wetland of International Importance . Okefenokee's natural beauty was first threatened in the 1890's, when attempts were made to drain the swamp to facilitate logging operations . The Suwannee Canal was dug 11 .5 miles into the swamp from Camp Cornelia . After the failure of this project, known as "Jackson's Folly," other interests acquired the swamp and began removing timber in 1909, using a network of tramroads extending deep into the major timbered areas . When logging operations were halted in 1927, over 423 million board feet of timber, mostly cypress, had been removed from the swamp . The establishment of Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge on March 30, 1937 0 marked the culmination of a movement that had been initiated at least 25 years earlier by a group of scientists from Cornell University who recognized the education, scientific and recreational values of this unique area .
    [Show full text]
  • Mammals of the Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge
    • (Left to right) Lloyd Culp, Vicky Chapman (YACC ) Cecile Davis, John Eadie and Dartha Pittma n (Staff ) • (Left to right) William Kent, Terry Lindsay , Jim Burkhart and Tom Worthington . (Staff ) t N (Left to right) Kneeling : Barcus Hamilton and Tony Gooch ; Standing : Omer Bowen, Ron Phernetton, Virgil Crews and Jay Burc h (Staff) 0 (Left to right) : Douglas Huss and Royce Hube r (Staff) • (Left to right) Nell Snowden, Ralph Davi s and Vannie Hickox (Iva Chesser is not shown) . (Staff ) r t PERSONNE L 1 . John R. Eadie (EOD 08/07/72) Refuge Manager (GS 13/7, PFT ) 2 . Timothy Wilkins (EOD 06/04/78 ) Asst . Refuge Manager transferred to Yazoo NWR (GS 11/3, PFT ) 12/28/80 3 . Lloyd A . Culp, Jr . (EOD 12/04/78) Asst . Refuge Manage r (GS 9/2, PFT ) 4 . Royce R . Huber (EOD 12/30/79) Asst . Refuge Manage r (GS 9/2, PFT ) 5 . Ronald A . Phernetton (EOD 01/09/74) Forester (CS 11/4, PFT ) 6 . Tony R . Gooch (EOD 08/18/80) Forestry Technician (GS 4/1 , • Career-Seasonal ) 7 . Steve Taylor (EOD 11/04/79 ) Forestry Technician (GS 4/1 , terminated 05/02/80 Temporary Appt . ) 8 . James A. Burkhart (EOD 06/11/78) Chief Outdoor Recreation Planne r (GS 11/3, PFT ) 9 . William C . Kent (EOD 06/03/79) Outdoor Recreation Planne r (GS 7/1, PFT ) 10 . Norman T . Lindsay (EOD 04/23/79 Outdoor Recreation Planne r (GS 7/1, PFT ) 11 . Thomas Worthington (EOD 10/07/79) Outdoor Recreation Planner (GS 7/1, PFT) 12 .
    [Show full text]
  • Humic Substances in the Suwannee River, Georgia: Interactions, Properties, and Proposed Structures
    Humic Substances in the Suwannee River, Georgia: Interactions, Properties, and Proposed Structures United States Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2373 Humic Substances in the Suwannee River, Georgia: Interactions, Properties, and Proposed Structures Edited by R.C. AVERETT, J.A. LEENHEER, D.M. McKNIGHT, and K.A. THORN This volume is published as chapters A-R These chapters are not available separately. U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 2373 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U. S. Government. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1994 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Map Distribution Box 25286, MS 306, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Humic substances in the Suwannee River, Georgia : interactions, properties, and proposed structures / edited by R.C. Averett [et al.] p. cm. (U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper; 2373) Includes bibliographical references. Supt.ofDocs.no.: 119.13: 2373 1. Humic acid. 2. Water chemistry. 3. Hydrology Okefenokee Swamp (Ga. and Fla.) I. Averett, R.C. II. Geological Survey (U.S.) III. Series. GB857.2.043H86 1995 551.48 dc20 93-27314 CIP FOREWORD Humic substances as a collective term and humic and fulvic acids as spe­ cific terms are not household words. For about a century, these terms belonged to the domain of the soil scientist. Even though their chemical structures remained elusive, they were recognized as important entities in soil.
    [Show full text]
  • October 12-18, 2014
    Department of Natural Resources Law Enforcement Division Field Operations Weekly Report October 12-18, 2014 This report is a broad sampling of events that have taken place in the past week, but does not include all actions taken by the Law Enforcement Division. Region I- Calhoun (Northwest) BARTOW COUNTY On October 17th, Cpl. Lee Burns was interviewing an Archeologist at the Etowah River Boat Ramp on Highway 411 when he heard a loud crash. Cpl. Burns looked up and witnessed passenger vehicle spinning out of control down Highway 411. The vehicle collided with a concrete truck crossing the highway. Hearing screams, Cpl. Burns ran up to the highway and found the passenger entrapped and in need of medical assistance. Cpl. Burns immediately radioed the Bartow County and Georgia State Patrol dispatchers for assistance. A Floyd Medical Center Emergency Medical Technician stopped as well, and assisted with c-spine on the passenger. Bartow County Fire was able to cut the passenger door off the vehicle and render much needed medical attention. Both occupants were transported to the hospital for medical treatment. On October 18th, just after midnight Cpl. Byron Young responded to a call for assistance from the Georgia State Patrol. A police chase started after a suspect rammed a Paulding County Police car and ended up on I-75. The suspect crashed his truck on the I-75 Allatoona Lake Bridge in Bartow County. The male suspect then jumped from I-75 into Allatoona Lake. Cpl. Young was contacted to provide a patrol boat to search for the suspect. Bartow County Fire and Rescue also responded by boat.
    [Show full text]
  • (EPD) Used Its 2018 Listing Assessment Methodology in Making Its Listing Decisions
    Summary of Listing Decisions The Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) used its 2018 Listing Assessment Methodology in making its listing decisions. This document provides more detail to explain why certain listing decisions were made including (1) how the “natural conditions” provisions in our water quality standards are used when making listing decisions; (2) why 6 waters on Georgia’s coast were removed from Category 3 for FCG(As) – arsenic in fish tissue; and (3) why other waters were placed or remain in Category 3. Assessment of Waters Based on “Natural Water Quality” Chapter 391-3-6-.03(7) of the Rules and Regulations for Water Quality Control recognizes that some waters of the State “naturally” will not meet the instream criteria and that this situation does not constitute a violation of water quality standards. Many waters in Georgia, specifically areas in South Georgia and near the Coast, have “natural” dissolved oxygen concentrations below the State’s standard dissolved oxygen (DO) criteria (daily average of 5.0 mg/l and an instantaneous minimum of 4.0 mg/l). Many of these waters were placed in Category 3 (Assessment Pending) when the DO criteria were not met, but it was determined that the cause was likely due to natural water quality conditions versus a human caused condition. The placement of waters in Category 3 for DO is explained in more detail later in this document. EPD also considered things such as the presence of beaver dams when evaluating water quality data. While the presence of beaver dams and ponds can help improve water quality by trapping sediment and removing nutrients through increased plant production, the stagnant water in the beaver pond will naturally have different characteristics than a free flowing stream (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1979 Narrative Report for Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge
    a THE 1979 NARRATIVE REPORT FOR OKEFENOKEE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE IS DEDICATED TO "RICHARD S . BOLT, JR ." 6L6T - OC61 0 1; -1.3-4-. 0 March 14, 1979 IN REMEMBRANCE Richard began his U . S . Fish and Wildlife Service career on June 1, 1964 as a temporary bulldozer operator on Santee National Wildlife Refuge, South Carolina . He became a career employee while stationed at Eufaula National Wildlife Refuge, Alabama . Subsequently, Richard served in a highly commendable manner on Key Deer and Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuges in Florida before coming to Okefenokee . Richard was truly a dedicated refuge employee . He gave his all and ultimately his life to the profession of which he was so very proud . Richard always will be remembered as an example in his private and professional life . He will be missed by all that knew him, and those who never knew this man will be less than they might have been . Richard's radio number, while he was stationed at Okefenokee, was "Unit 3" . From this time on, "Unit 3" is hereby retired as a memorial to a splendid human being . John R . Eadie Refuge Manager 0 YACC Enrollees (Staff) PERSONNEL 1 . John R . Eadie (EOD 08/07/72) Refuge Manager (GS 13/6, PFT) 2 . Timothy Wilkins (EOD 06/04/78) Asst . Refuge Manager (GS 11/2, PFT) 3 . Lloyd A . Culp, Jr . (EOD 12/04/78) Asst . Refuge Manager (GS 9/1, PFT) 4 . Royce R . Huber (EOD 12/30/79) Asst . Refuge Manager transferred from National Key (GS 9/1, PFT) Deer NWR (picture not shown) 5 .
    [Show full text]