DOCSLIB.ORG

Mammal Inventory for Navajo National Monument

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mammal Inventory for Navajo National Monument National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Mammal Inventory for Navajo National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SCPN/NRTR—2010/377 ON THE COVER The black-tailed jackrabbit was one of the 41 species found during this inventory. Photograph by: Marge Post/NPS Mammal Inventory for Navajo National Monument Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SCPN/NRTR—2010/377 Shauna Haymond Holistic Wildlife Services NM, LLC 112 Hampton Roads Avenue Hampton, VA 23661 Richard E. Sherwin Department of Biology, Chemistry, and Environmental Science Christopher Newport University 1 University Place Newport News, VA 23606-2998 September 2010 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natu- ral resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientif- ically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This project was funded through Colorado Plateau Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit agreements (CA- 120099009, Tasks NN-02 and NN-04; CA-H1200040002, Task NN-5). This report is available from the Southern Colorado Plateau Network website (http://www.nature.nps.gov/im/units/SCPN) and the Natural Resource Publications Management Web site (http://www.nature.nps.gov/publications/NRPM) on the Internet. Please cite this publication as: Haymond, S., and R. Sherwin. 2010. Mammal inventory for Navajo National Monument. Natural Resource Tech- nical Report NPS/SCPN/NRTR—2010/377. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS 312/105744, September 2010 ii Contents Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................................... vii Introduction..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Study Area ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Colorado Plateau ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Physical description ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 Local vegetation ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 Betatakin Canyon ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 Keet Seel ................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Inscription House ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Methods .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Initial species richness estimation ................................................................................................................................... 3 Field methods ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Small terrestrial mammal inventories .......................................................................................................................... 3 Bat inventories ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Carnivore inventories ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Opportunistic observations ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Data methods ............................................................................................................................................................... 4 Results ............................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Sampling effort .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Species richness and abundance .................................................................................................................................... 5 Species of concern ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Discussion ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Species richness estimation ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Species richness and abundance ................................................................................................................................... 9 Species distribution ...................................................................................................................................................... 10 Recommendations ....................................................................................................................................................... 10 Literature Cited ............................................................................................................................................................. 13 iii Mammal Inventory for Navajo National Monument Figures Figure 1. At Betatakin Canyon, pinyon-juniper woodlands dominate the mesa tops, while quaking aspen and Douglas fir cluster near the canyon head. ................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2. Betatakin Canyon site. Diamonds are approximate locations of mammal inventory sampling points (mist nets, beginnings of traplines, acoustic sampling stations, and beginnings of track and scat surveys). .......... 4 Figure 3. Keet Seel site. Diamonds are approximate locations of mammal inventory sampling points (mist nets, beginnings of traplines, acoustic sampling stations, and beginnings of track and scat surveys). ............................. 4 Figure 4. Inscription House site. Diamonds are approximate locations of mammal inventory sampling points (mist nets, beginnings of traplines, acoustic sampling stations, and beginnings of track and scat surveys). .......... 4 Tables Table 1. Sampling effort, schedule, and methods for 2003-2004 mammal inventories at Navajo National Monument. .......................................................................................................................................................................5 Table 2. Number of species documented compared to the number of estimated species for each mammal order at Navajo National Monument. ........................................................................................................................... 6 Table 3. Confirmed and probable mammals at Navajo National Monument. ........................................................... 6 Table 4. Abundance of mammal species captured or observed at Navajo National Monument during 2003 and 2004 inventories. ............................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mammal Species Native to the USA and Canada for Which the MIL Has an Image (296) 31 July 2021
    Mammal species native to the USA and Canada for which the MIL has an image (296) 31 July 2021 ARTIODACTYLA (includes CETACEA) (38) ANTILOCAPRIDAE - pronghorns Antilocapra americana - Pronghorn BALAENIDAE - bowheads and right whales 1. Balaena mysticetus – Bowhead Whale BALAENOPTERIDAE -rorqual whales 1. Balaenoptera acutorostrata – Common Minke Whale 2. Balaenoptera borealis - Sei Whale 3. Balaenoptera brydei - Bryde’s Whale 4. Balaenoptera musculus - Blue Whale 5. Balaenoptera physalus - Fin Whale 6. Eschrichtius robustus - Gray Whale 7. Megaptera novaeangliae - Humpback Whale BOVIDAE - cattle, sheep, goats, and antelopes 1. Bos bison - American Bison 2. Oreamnos americanus - Mountain Goat 3. Ovibos moschatus - Muskox 4. Ovis canadensis - Bighorn Sheep 5. Ovis dalli - Thinhorn Sheep CERVIDAE - deer 1. Alces alces - Moose 2. Cervus canadensis - Wapiti (Elk) 3. Odocoileus hemionus - Mule Deer 4. Odocoileus virginianus - White-tailed Deer 5. Rangifer tarandus -Caribou DELPHINIDAE - ocean dolphins 1. Delphinus delphis - Common Dolphin 2. Globicephala macrorhynchus - Short-finned Pilot Whale 3. Grampus griseus - Risso's Dolphin 4. Lagenorhynchus albirostris - White-beaked Dolphin 5. Lissodelphis borealis - Northern Right-whale Dolphin 6. Orcinus orca - Killer Whale 7. Peponocephala electra - Melon-headed Whale 8. Pseudorca crassidens - False Killer Whale 9. Sagmatias obliquidens - Pacific White-sided Dolphin 10. Stenella coeruleoalba - Striped Dolphin 11. Stenella frontalis – Atlantic Spotted Dolphin 12. Steno bredanensis - Rough-toothed Dolphin 13. Tursiops truncatus - Common Bottlenose Dolphin MONODONTIDAE - narwhals, belugas 1. Delphinapterus leucas - Beluga 2. Monodon monoceros - Narwhal PHOCOENIDAE - porpoises 1. Phocoena phocoena - Harbor Porpoise 2. Phocoenoides dalli - Dall’s Porpoise PHYSETERIDAE - sperm whales Physeter macrocephalus – Sperm Whale TAYASSUIDAE - peccaries Dicotyles tajacu - Collared Peccary CARNIVORA (48) CANIDAE - dogs 1. Canis latrans - Coyote 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport of a Juvenile Pinyon Mouse (Peromyscus Truei)
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 53 Number 3 Article 12 9-27-1993 Transport of a juvenile pinyon mouse (Peromyscus truei) J. R. Callahan University of New Mexico, Albuquerque Daniel S. Compton Idylwild School, Idylwild, California Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Callahan, J. R. and Compton, Daniel S. (1993) "Transport of a juvenile pinyon mouse (Peromyscus truei)," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 53 : No. 3 , Article 12. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol53/iss3/12 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Great Basin Naturalist 53(3), pp. 316-317 TRANSPORT OF AJUVENILE PINYON MOUSE (PEROMYSCUS TRUEI) J. R. Callahan! and Daniel S. Compton' Key words: Peromyscus, tr"tlr1$pOrt, clinging, juvenile, predator. On 18 July 1992 we observed an interest­ underside, sending fragments of roUen wood ing mode of transport of a juvenile pinyon and loam flying in all directions. Both mice mouse (PeromysCtIS truei) by an adult female were concealed within minutes. presumed to be its parent. The habitat was "Nipple clinging" behavior has been transitional between Arctostaphylos/Cea1Wth­ reported for several species of Peromyscus, us/QuerCtlS chaparral and mi<ed conifer forest but we could find no published discussion of in the San Jacinto Mountains, Riverside the phenomenon more recent than Layne County, California, elevation 2100 m.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Mammals at Walnut Canyon, Wupatki, and Sunset Crater National Monuments
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Inventory of Mammals at Walnut Canyon, Wupatki, and Sunset Crater National Monuments Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SCPN/NRTR–2009/278 ON THE COVER: Top: Wupatki National Monument; bottom left: bobcat (Lynx rufus); bottom right: Wupatki pocket mouse (Perogna- thus amplus cineris) at Wupatki National Monument. Photos courtesy of U.S. Geological Survey/Charles Drost. Inventory of Mammals at Walnut Canyon, Wupatki, and Sunset Crater National Monuments Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SCPN/NRTR—2009/278 Author Charles Drost U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center 2255 N. Gemini Drive Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Editing and Design Jean Palumbo National Park Service, Southern Colorado Plateau Network Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Arizona December 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Evidence for a Tacaribe Serocomplex Virus, Mexico
    blood, samples of kidney and other solid tissues, and the Genetic Evidence skins and skeletons of the rodents were deposited into the Museum of Texas Tech University. for a Tacaribe The blood samples were tested by ELISA (10) for anti- body (immunoglobulin [Ig] G) to Whitewater Arroyo virus Serocomplex strain AV 9310135 (7). Samples of spleen and kidney from white-toothed woodrats TK133448 and TK133451, 7 oth- Virus, Mexico er white-toothed woodrats, 2 antibody-positive Nelson’s Catherine C. Inizan, Maria N. B. Cajimat, pocket mice (Chaetodipus nelsoni), and an antibody-pos- Mary Louise Milazzo, Artemio Barragán-Gomez, itive Merriam’s kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriami) were Robert D. Bradley, and Charles F. Fulhorst tested for arenavirus by cultivation in monolayers of Vero E6 cells (11). Samples of kidney from the antibody-positive We isolated arenavirus RNA from white-toothed wood- rodents were tested for arenavirus RNA by using hemin- rats (Neotoma leucodon) captured in a region of Mexico in ested PCR assays. The fi rst-strand cDNA for the PCR was which woodrats are food for humans. Analyses of nucleotide synthesized by using SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase and amino acid sequence data indicated that the woodrats were infected with a novel Tacaribe serocomplex virus, pro- (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) posed name Real de Catorce virus. in conjunction with oligont 19C-cons (2). The nucleotide sequence alignments were analyzed by using MRBAYES 3.1.2 (12) in the computer software package PAUP*, ver- he Tacaribe serocomplex (family Arenaviridae, ge- sion 4.0b10 (http://paup.csit.fsu.edu).
    [Show full text]
  • Blocks All Weather Bait
    Brand KILLS RATS AND MICE* Blocks All Weather Bait Kills Rats, Mice, and Meadow Voles* Kills Norway Rats, Roof Rats, Cotton Rats*, Polynesian Rats*, White-throated woodrat*, Southern plains woodrat*, Mexican woodrat*, House Mice, Eastern Harvest Mice*, Golden Mice*, and Meadow Voles* Norway Rats, Roof Rats, and House Mice usually consume a lethal dose in a single night’s feeding, but it may take two or more days from time of bait consumption for them to die. KEEP OUT OF REACH OF This product is effective against anticoagulant-resistant Norway Rats, Roof Rats, and House Mice. CHILDREN Moisture Resistant • Weather Resistant CAUTION See back panel and inside leaflet for First Aid This product may only be used inside and within 100 feet of and Precautionary Statements man-made structures or inside of transport vehicles (ships, trains, or aircraft). This Product May Not Be Sold in Packaging that Holds Less Than 4 Pounds of Bait. Active Ingredient: Bromethalin (CAS No: 63333-35-7):......................0.01% Other Ingredients:............................................... 99.99% Total.................................................................100.00% EPA Reg. No. 61282-75 EPA Est. No. 61282-WI-01 Item No. 112831 BK220498-1219 *Not permitted for use against the following species in California: Cotton rat, Polynesian rat, White-throated woodrat, Southern plains woodrat, Mexican woodrat, Eastern harvest mouse, Golden mouse, Meadow vole Net Contents: 128 x 0.5 oz. (14 g) Net Weight: 4 lbs. (1.81 kg) BK 220062 (See front page of leaflet for First Aid) Bait stations are mandatory for outdoor, above-ground use. Tamper-resistant bait stations must be used wherever children, pets, non-target mammals, or birds SureKill® Brand Assault® Blocks may have access to the bait placement location.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammals of Central Mexico Juan Cruzado Cortes and Venkat Sankar (Author; [email protected]) August 5-10, 2019
    Venkat Sankar 2019 1 Mammals of Central Mexico Juan Cruzado Cortes and Venkat Sankar (author; [email protected]) August 5-10, 2019 Beautiful scenery at Barrancas de Aguacatitla; Mexican Volcano Mouse; Mexican Ground Squirrel Introduction While searching for mammals in Oaxaca this March, Juan told me that a mammalogist friend of his in Tabasco, Dr. Rafael Avila Flores, had found some amazing bats in an area of karst near the state’s border with Chiapas. These included a number of impressive and distinctive species I’ve long wanted to see, like the Sword-nosed Bat and White-winged Vampire Bat. I had to visit, and with few breaks this summer thanks to academic commitments, this was the perfect choice for a long weekend’s trip. Juan suggested we spend a few days in Mexico City with another biologist friend, Melany Aguilar Lopez, to find several endemics of the Mexican Plateau, and then connect to Tabasco. And so a plan was formed! Itinerary 8/5/19: Mexico City—RB Barrancas de Metztitlan (O/N UMA Santana) 8/6/19: RB Barrancas de Metztitlan—PN el Chico (O/N Mineral de Chico) 8/7/19: PN el Chico—Tlaxco—Area Communitaria Milpa Alta (O/N San Pablo Oztotepec) 8/8/19: Milpa Alta—Villahermosa (flight)—Ejido Poana (O/N Tacotalpa) 8/9/19: Full day exploring Ejido Poana (O/N Tacotalpa) 8/10/19: Early deparature from Villahermosa Key sites RB Barrancas de Metztitlan This scenic area of deep canyons spans a diverse range of habitats from dry pine-oak forest on the rim, into high desert, and eventually tropical deciduous forest on the canyon floor.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammals at Navajo National Monument
    Final Report for 2003 and 2004 Mammal Inventories on Selected National Park Service Southern Colorado Plateau Network Parks: Navajo National Monument January 2005 Prepared by: Shauna Haymond, Holistic Wildlife Services NM, LLC, 112 Hampton Roads Avenue, Hampton, Virginia 23661, and Richard E. Sherwin, Department of Biology, Chemistry and Environmental Science, Christopher Newport University, 1 University Place, Newport News, Virginia 23606-2998 Submitted to: Navajo Nation Department of Fish and Wildlife, P. O. Box 1480, Window Rock, AZ 96515 ABSTRACT Holistic Wildlife Services NM was contracted by the Navajo Nation Department of Fish and Wildlife to conduct biological inventories for mammals at Navajo National Monument (NAVA) as part of the National Park Service Inventory and Monitoring Program. The goals of this study were to document at least 90% of the mammals using verifiable documentation and taxa-specific field surveys, provide distributional information, estimates of species richness, and relative abundance of mammals, and provide baseline information and make recommendations to develop future management and monitoring schemes of zoological resources. There had been no baseline mammal work conducted at NAVA prior to these surveys. A total of 26 mammal species were estimated to inhabit the park based on species-area models; however we estimated 51 species for NAVA based on known specific ranges and available museum records. Field inventories extended from 29 June to 29 September 2003, and 16 May to 5 July 2004. We used a variety of survey methods including live-trapping, mist netting and acoustic surveys for bats, track-scat surveys, and opportunistic observations. We documented a total of 41 species (Chiroptera, 12 species; Lagomorpha, 2 species; Rodentia, 18 species; Carnivora, 8 species; and Artiodactyla, 1 species).
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Management of Pinyon-Juniper Communities Within the Interior West; 1997 September 15-18; Provo, UT
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Commercial Fuelwood Harvesting Affects on Small Mammal Habitats in Central Arizona William H. Kruse Abstract-In a central Arizona fuelwood harvest area, 75 percent by burning affects the newly formed slash habitat for small of the overstory was cut in a commercial harvest, resulting in large mammals and plants and also reorganizes the nutrient base quantities of residual logging debris that altered habitat for many stored in the slash (Harrington 1989, Covington and DeBano wildlife species. Small mammals have intricate roles in ecosystem 1988). Natural decomposition of residual slash provides a function, and current fuelwood management practices have para­ slower and more complete return of nutrients to the system, doxical affects on small mammal habitats. In a small mammal while providing the protective effects of slash. J uni per slash, study, no differences in total animals capt,ured were detected among unlike pine slash, decomposes at a slower rate. treatment plots. Immediately following overs tory reduction or re­ Small mammal populations are impacted by overstory moval in 1992 and 1993, differences among species ca ptures, s pecifi­ disturbances (Turkowski and Reynolds 1970) while on-the­ cally deer mouse, increased significantly. The increased capture ground slash causes an increase in abundance of some rate remained significant throughout the remainder of the study. rodent species regardless of overstory condition (Severson Pinyon mouse captures declined significantly immediately follow­ 1986). Kruse and others (1979) found that when the over­ ing treatments, but were not detectablydifferent from pretreatment story was removed or reduced, rodents that preferred the levels a year later.
    [Show full text]
  • General Biology of Major Prey Species of the California Spotted Owl
    Chapter 10 General Biology of Major Prey Species of the California Spotted Owl Daniel F. Williams, Jared Verner, Howard F. Sakai, and Jeffrey R. Waters Full understanding of the habitat relations of California geographic range (see color photo 5-29). They are most numer- spotted owls depends, in part, on knowledge of the habitat ous where shrub cover is dense, and least abundant in open areas relations of their primary prey species. For example, the north- (Fitch 1947). They are one of few small mammal species of ern flying squirrel is the primary prey of the owl in conifer chaparral habitats that flourish in old, dense stands (Quinn 1990). forests of the Sierra Nevada, comprising as much as 61 to 77 Habitats that are unsuited or poorly suited for dusky-footed percent of the total biomass eaten in some localities and seasons woodrats include open grasslands or fallow, weedy ground; (table 4A). The dusky-footed woodrat is the primary prey in sparsely wooded forests; woodlands solely of conifers or with lower-elevation forests and woodlands of the Sierra Nevada and little shrub understory; and pure stands of chamise, manzanita, throughout all habitats in southern California, making up 74-94 or ceanothus (Linsdale and Tevis 1951). percent of the diet, by weight, in various areas. Current evidence In the Sierra Nevada, this woodrat occurs generally below indicates that suitable nest sites and the most common foods of 5,000 feet in elevation (lower in the north-about 3,300 feet at northern flying squirrels are usually found together in mature Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Approximately 220 Species of Wild Mammals Occur in California And
    Mammals pproximately 220 species of wild mammals occur in California and the surrounding waters (including introduced species, but not domestic species Asuch as house cats). Amazingly, the state of California has about half of the total number of species that occur on the North American continent (about 440). In part, this diversity reflects the sheer number of different habitats available throughout the state, including alpine, desert, coniferous forest, grassland, oak woodland, and chaparral habitat types, among others (Bakker 1984, Schoenherr 1992, Alden et al. 1998). About 17 mammal species are endemic to California; most of these are kangaroo rats, chipmunks, and squirrels. Nearly 25% of California’s mammal species are either known or suspected to occur at Quail Ridge (Appendix 9). Species found at Quail Ridge are typical of both the Northwestern California and Great Central Valley mammalian faunas. Two California endemics, the Sonoma chipmunk (see Species Accounts for scientific names) and the San Joaquin pocket mouse, are known to occur at Quail Ridge. None of the mammals at Quail Ridge are listed as threatened or endangered by either the state or federal governments, although Townsend’s big-eared bat, which is suspected to occur at Quail Ridge, is a state-listed species of special concern. Many mammal species are nocturnal, fossorial, fly, or are otherwise difficult to observe. However, it is still possible to detect the presence of mammals at Quail Ridge, both visually and by observation of their tracks, scat, and other sign. The mammals most often seen during the day are mule deer and western gray squirrels.
    [Show full text]
  • US EPA, Pesticide Product Label, ROZOL VOLE BAIT,12/08/2020
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, DC 20460 OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION December 8, 2020 Kylli Paavola Sr. Compliance Specialist Liphatech, Inc. 3600 W. Elm Street Milwaukee, WI 53209 Subject: Label Amendment – Adding bushy-tailed woodrat to the label Product Name: Rozol Vole Bait EPA Registration Number: 7173-242 Application Date: June 10, 2020 Decision Number: 564027 Dear Ms. Paavola: The amended label referred to above, submitted in connection with registration under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended, is acceptable. This approval does not affect any conditions that were previously imposed on this registration. You continue to be subject to existing conditions on your registration and any deadlines connected with them. A stamped copy of your labeling is enclosed for your records. This labeling supersedes all previously accepted labeling. You must submit one copy of the final printed labeling before you release the product for shipment with the new labeling. In accordance with 40 CFR 152.130(c), you may distribute or sell this product under the previously approved labeling for 18 months from the date of this letter. After 18 months, you may only distribute or sell this product if it bears this new revised labeling or subsequently approved labeling. “To distribute or sell” is defined under FIFRA section 2(gg) and its implementing regulation at 40 CFR 152.3. Should you wish to add/retain a reference to the company’s website on your label, then please be aware that the website becomes labeling under the Federal Insecticide Fungicide and Rodenticide Act and is subject to review by the Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Peromyscus Newsletter
    PEROMYSCUS NEWSLETTER NUMBER THIRTY-EIGHT AUTUMN 2004 Cover: A Deer Mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus rufinus) with a striking "blazed" head pattern. See entry by Katy Mirowsky and Brian Hjelle pp. 22 this issue. PN 38 - This issue of PEROMYSCUS NEWSLETTER follows soon after the mailing of the triennial "Genetics and Genomics" issue, and includes correspondents' entries received earlier in 2004 that we did not have space for in that previous issue. And we thank those who kindly responded to our request for information about activities in their research programs. PN is published twice annually by the Peromyscus Genetic Stock Center at the University of South Carolina. Please notice that effective January 2005 that charges for many of our stocks and materials have been increased due to greater costs of maintenance and shipping. In this issue we report progress in developing a phylogenetic tree for peromyscine rodents. We intend the tree to serve as a useful reference for all with interest in any aspect of peromyscine biology, and not specifically for systematic and evolutionary biologists (See p. 7). The Stock Center had an excellent year in 2004 supplying a record number of animals and materials for research and education to institutions around the world. Stock Center utilization over the nineteen years of its existence in numbers of animals and specimens supplied is shown in the graph on page 7. The Stock Center also provides numerous animals and related materials for in-house research at the University of South Carolina. The Stock Center is funded by grants from NSF and NIH, user fees (sales), University in-house funds and donations.
    [Show full text]