International General Terms and Conditions of Purchase Tc-004 (12/09)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

International General Terms and Conditions of Purchase Tc-004 (12/09) INTERNATIONAL GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PURCHASE TC-004 (12/09) PART I – GENERAL PROVISIONS (e) Invoices shall be produced entirely in English and shall include the elements set forth in Exhibit A. 1. Acceptance of Purchase Order 3. Delivery; Notice of Delay Agreement by Seller to furnish the materials, products, or services hereby ordered, or its commencement of such performance, or (a) Time is of the essence and failure to deliver in accor- acceptance of any payment, shall constitute acceptance by Seller dance with the delivery schedule under this Purchase of this Purchase Order subject to these terms and conditions. In the Order, if unexcused, shall be considered a material event that this Purchase Order does not state price or delivery, breach of this Purchase Order. No acts of Buyer, Buyer will not be bound to any prices or delivery to which it has not including without limitation modifications of this Purchase specifically agreed in writing. Any terms or conditions proposed by Order or acceptance of late deliveries, shall constitute Seller inconsistent with or in addition to the terms and conditions of waiver of this provision. purchase herein contained shall be void and of no effect unless (b) Seller shall notify Buyer in writing immediately of any specifically agreed to by Buyer in writing. Modifications hereof or actual or potential delay to the performance of this additions hereto, to be effective, must be made in writing and Purchase Order. Such notice shall include a proposed signed by Buyer’s purchasing representative. These terms and revised schedule but such notice and proposal or Buyer’s conditions, together with any referenced exhibits, attachments or receipt or acceptance thereof shall not constitute a waiver other documents, constitute the entire agreement between the to Buyer’s rights and remedies hereunder. Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Purchase Order; 4. Termination for Convenience and supersede any prior or contemporaneous written or oral (a) Buyer may, by notice in writing, terminate this Purchase agreements pertaining to this Purchase Order. Order or work under this Purchase Order for convenience 2. Shipping Instructions and without cause, in whole or in part, at any time, and (a) Seller shall be responsible for ensuring adequate and/or such termination shall not constitute default. In the event compliant packaging of materials hereunder. No charges of partial termination, Seller is not excused from will be allowed for packing, crating, freight, local cartage, performance of the non-terminated balance of work under and/or any other services unless so specified in this the Purchase Order. Purchase Order. (b) In the event of termination for convenience by Buyer, (b) If Seller uses wood packaging materials such as pallets, Seller shall be reimbursed for actual, reasonable, crates, boxes, dunnages, cases, skids and pieces of substantiated and allocable costs, plus a reasonable profit wood used to support or brace cargo being imported into for work performed to date of termination. Any termination the United States, it shall be heat treated or fumigated settlement proposal shall be submitted to Buyer promptly, with methyl bromide in accordance with EPA label but no later than ninety (90) days from the effective date of instructions and include a mark that certifies the wood the termination. In no event shall the amount of any completed the required treatment under the “Guidelines settlement be in excess of the Purchase Order value. for Regulating Wood Packaging Material in International Buyer may take immediate possession of all work so Trade,” ISPM 15 of the International Standards of performed upon written notice of termination to Seller. Phytosanitary Measures (ISPM) and any associated 5. Termination for Default amendments, revisions or exemption identified by the (a) Subject to paragraphs (c) and (d) below, Buyer may, by U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health notice in writing, terminate this Purchase Order in whole Inspection Service (APHIS). or in part at any time in the event that Seller breaches any (c) Seller shall at all times comply fully with Buyer’s written one or more of its terms, fails to make progress so as to shipping instructions and Incoterms 2000 reflected on the endanger performance of this Purchase Order, fails to Purchase Order. Unless otherwise directed, all items provide adequate assurance of future performance, shipped on the same day from and to a single location becomes insolvent, makes a general assignment for the must be consolidated on one bill of lading or airbill, as benefit of creditors, or files or has filed against it a petition appropriate. Seller shall submit all required shipping of bankruptcy or pursues any other remedy under any papers to Buyer prior to final payment. For material other law relating to the relief for debtors, or in the event a purchased F.O.B. origin, Seller shall not insure and not trustee or receiver is appointed for Seller’s property or declare a value except when transportation rates are “ ” business. In the event of partial termination, Seller is not based on released value, in which instance Seller shall excused from performance of the non-terminated balance annotate on the bill of lading the lowest released value of work under the Purchase Order. provided in applicable tariffs. (b) In the event of Seller’s default hereunder, Buyer may (d) Purchase Order number(s) must appear on all exercise any or all rights accruing to it, both at law, or in correspondence, shipping labels, and shipping equity. documents, including all packing sheets, bills of lading, (c) If this Purchase Order is terminated for default, Buyer airbills, and invoices. may require Seller to transfer title to, and deliver to Buyer, TC-004 (12/09) 1 of 16 TC-004 (12/09) (continued) as directed by Buyer, any (1) completed supplies, and (2) having jurisdiction thereof. The Arbitrator(s) award may partially completed supplies and materials, parts, tools, include compensatory damages against either Party. dies, jigs, fixtures, plans, drawings, information, and Under no circumstances will the Arbitrator(s) be author- contract rights (collectively referred to as “manufacturing ized to, nor shall they award punitive damages or materials” in this clause) that Seller has specifically multiple damages against either Party. The Arbitrator(s) produced or acquired for the terminated portion of this shall have the authority but not the obligation to award Purchase Order. Upon direction of Buyer, Seller shall also the costs of arbitration and reasonable attorney’s fees to protect and preserve property in its possession in which the prevailing Party; however, if the Arbitrator(s) do not Buyer has an interest. award such costs and fees, each Party will be (d) Buyer shall pay the Purchase Order price for completed responsible for its costs incurred in arbitration except that supplies delivered or services performed and accepted. the costs and fees imposed by the Arbitrator(s) for their Seller and Buyer shall agree on the fair and reasonable expenses shall be borne equally by the Parties. amount of payment for manufacturing materials delivered (c) Pending any final decision, or the settlement of any and accepted and for the protection and preservation of dispute arising under this Purchase Order, Seller shall the property. proceed diligently, as directed by Buyer, with perfor- 6. Force Majeure mance of the Purchase Order. (d) To the maximum extent permitted by law, the Parties ’ (a) Except for defaults of Sellers subcontractors at any tier, waive any right to a jury trial. neither Buyer nor Seller shall be liable for any failure to perform due to any cause beyond their reasonable control 8. Remedies and without their fault or negligence. Such causes (a) Except as otherwise provided herein, the rights and include, but are not limited to, acts of God or of the public remedies of both Parties hereunder shall be in addition to enemy, acts of the Government in its sovereign or their rights and remedies at law or in equity. Failure of contractual capacity, fires, floods, epidemics, terrorism, either Party to enforce any of its rights shall not constitute quarantine restrictions, strikes, freight embargoes, and a waiver of such rights or of any other rights and shall not unusually severe weather. In the event that performance be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of any such of this Purchase Order is hindered, delayed or adversely provisions, rights or remedies; rather, the same shall affected by causes of the type described above (“Force remain in full force and effect. Majeure”), then the Party whose performance is so (b) Buyer shall be entitled at all times to set off any amount affected shall so notify the other Party’s authorized owing at any time from Seller or any of its affiliated representative in writing and, at Buyer’s option, this companies to Buyer, against any amount payable at any Purchase Order shall be completed with such time by Buyer or any of its affiliated companies to Seller. adjustments to delivery schedule as are reasonably 9. Proprietary Rights required by the existence of Force Majeure or this Purchase Order may be terminated for convenience (a) Unless otherwise expressly agreed in a contemporan- pursuant to Section 4. eous or subsequent writing to the contrary or otherwise (b) Failure of any relevant government to issue any required expressly set forth in this Purchase Order and subject to import or export license, or withdrawal/termination of a Section 9(d) below, all specifications, information, data, required import or export license by such relevant drawings, software and other items supplied to Buyer by government, shall relieve Buyer of its obligations under Seller shall be disclosed to Buyer on a non-proprietary this Purchase Order, and shall relieve Seller of its basis and may be used and/or disclosed by Buyer without corresponding obligations.
Recommended publications
  • Offsets in the Aerospace and Defence Industry
    Offsets in the Aerospace and Defence Industry 1 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 4 1.1 IFBEC and the Basel Institute on Governance .......................................................................... 5 2 Definitions and Context ................................................................................. 7 2.1 Definitions of offset ................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Some specific elements of offset programmes ......................................................................... 9 2.2.1 Valuation Methods .............................................................................................................................. 9 2.2.2 Excess credits and banking ......................................................................................................... 10 2.2.3 Offset credit swapping .................................................................................................................... 11 2.2.4 Financial penalties for companies ........................................................................................... 11 2.3 Size of the defence market ............................................................................................................... 11 2.4 Size of offset programmes ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Study on the Effects of Offsets on the Development of a European Defence Industry and Market
    Final Report of 06-DIM-022 Study on the effects of offsets on the Development of a European Defence Industry and Market By E. Anders Eriksson with contributions by Mattias Axelson, Keith Hartley, Mike Mason, Ann-Sofie Stenérus and Martin Trybus 12 July 2007 2007-07-12 Final report of 06-DIM-022 LIST OF CONTENTS Executive summary............................................................................................................................... 3 1 Introduction................................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Understanding the assignment: our working hypotheses ................................................................ 9 1.2 Delimitation of study..................................................................................................................... 10 1.3 Protection of respondents and data................................................................................................ 11 1.4 Outline of report............................................................................................................................ 11 1.5 The FOI/SCS team ........................................................................................................................ 11 2 Offset conceptual framework .................................................................................................... 13 2.1 Offset taxonomy used in the study...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Defence Offsets Addressing the Risks of Corruption & Raising Transparency
    DEFENCE OFFSETS ADDRESSING THE RISKS OF CORRUPTION & RAISING TRANSPARENCY www.defenceagainstcorruption.org www.transparency.org Transparency International (TI) is the civil society organisation leading the global fight against corruption. Through more than 90 chapters worldwide and an international secretariat in Berlin, Germany, TI raises awareness of the damaging effects of corruption, and works with partners in government, business and civil society to develop and implement effective measures to tackle it. For more information go to: www.transparency.org TI’s international defence programme, Defence Against Corruption (DAC) helps to build integrity and reduce corruption in defence and security establishments worldwide through supporting counter-corruption reform in nations, raising integrity in arms transfers, and influencing policy in defence and security. To achieve this, the DAC team works with governments, defence companies, multilateral organisations and civil society. DAC is led by Transparency International-UK on behalf of the TI movement. Information on Transparency International’s work in the defence and security sector to date, including background, overviews of current and past projects, and publications, is available on TI’s Defence Against Corruption website, www.defenceagainstcorruption.org First published April 2010 Publisher: Transparency International-UK Acknowledging the debt Transparency Authors: Ben Magahy, Francisco Vilhena International-UK (TI-UK) owes to all those Reproduction in whole or in parts is da Cunha and Mark Pyman. who have contributed to and collaborated permitted, providing that full credit is Editing : Julia Muravska and in the preparation of this publication, given to Transparency International-UK, Anne-Christine Wegener. we should make clear that TI-UK alone and provided that any such reproduction, Design: www.onehemisphere.se is responsible for the content of the whether in whole or in parts, is not sold document.
    [Show full text]
  • Offsets in Defense Trade Eleventh Report to Congress
    Offsets in Defense Trade Eleventh Report to Congress January 2007 U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security Offsets in Defense Trade Eleventh Study Conducted Pursuant to Section 309 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as Amended U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security Office of Strategic Industries and Economic Security January 2007 For more information, please contact the Office of Strategic Industries and Economic Security at 202-482-4506 www.bis.doc/osies i Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................iii 1 BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................1-1 1-1 STATUTES AND REGULATIONS.........................................................................................1-1 1-2 U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY ............................................................................................1-2 1-3 OFFSETS TERMINOLOGY .................................................................................................1-3 1-4 COUNTRIES AND REGIONS..............................................................................................1-5 1-5 SCOPE OF REPORT..........................................................................................................1-6 2 STATISTICAL OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................2-1 2-1 GENERAL OVERVIEW.......................................................................................................2-1
    [Show full text]
  • Export-Import Theory, Practices, and Procedures Second Edition
    Belay Seyoum, PhD Export-Import Theory, Practices, and Procedures Second Edition Pre-publication REVIEWS, COMMENTARIES, EVALUATIONS . his book covers a number of sig- this book starts with a brief history of “T nificant gaps that are not ad- international trade and concludes with dressed elsewhere. By focusing specifi- a sample distributorship agreement, cally on trade rather than other forms speaks to the singular achievement of of international expansion, Dr. Seyoum this book: true cover-to-cover, and top- has achieved the near-impossible—in- to-bottom, coverage of all relevant is- depth and thorough coverage of both sues in exporting and importing.” the theory and the practice of export- ing, and significantly broader coverage Dr. Nicolas Papadopoulos, PhD of importing than is the norm, thus of- Professor of Marketing and International fering the most complete coverage of Business; Associate Dean (Research); all facets of trade that I have seen. It ex- Director, International Business Study cels by integrating theory with practice Group, Eric Sprott School of Business, and exports with imports. The fact that Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada More pre-publication REVIEWS, COMMENTARIES, EVALUATIONS . nternational Trade has always been Commerce Department is a boon to “I a hands-on subject and the few any new or seasoned export manager. books that are out there do not address The useful presentation of typical im- anywhere near the width and depth port and export transactions as well as that Export-Import Theory, Practices, and samples of distributor agreements and Procedures: Second Edition, does. Each of business plans put this book way the twenty chapters in this book closes above any other in its class.” with a great summary.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross Analysis on Compensatory Measures in International Public Procurements Contracts
    Manufacturing in Myamar Photo credits: Christian SYLVAIN Cross analysis on Compensatory measures in international public procurements contracts This is the first step which is a cross analysis between 8 levels of criteria and the 11 selected countries. The objectives were to make an inventory of offsets practices and determine common principles of offsets. WORLD BANK COMMITTEEEDITED BY THE EUROPEAN CLUB FOR COUNTERTRADE AND OFFSET Cross analysis on Compensatory Measures in International Public Procurements contracts TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 CONCEPT NOTE ......................................................................................................................................................... 9 LEVEL 0: ECONOMIC DATA ......................................................................................................... 13 LEVEL 1: International institutions & public procurement measures ........................ 15 LEVEL 2: Regional/ multi / bilateral agreements on government procurement signed with other countries ...................................................................................................... 16 LEVEL 3: Inventory of national legislation and rules applicable at national levels on government procurement .................................................................................................... 22 LEVEL 4: Offsets rules at national
    [Show full text]
  • Why Failed So Often the Offset Part of a Defence Procurement Deal? – a Case Study Based Examination
    Business Management and Strategy ISSN 2157-6068 2014, Vol. 5, No. 2 Why Failed So Often the Offset Part of a Defence Procurement Deal? – A Case Study Based Examination Heinz Kirchwehm (Corresponding author) Faculty of Business Administration, Turiba University 68 Graudu Street, Riga, LV-1058, Latvia E-mail: [email protected] Received: July 04, 2014 Accepted: August 13, 2014 Published: September 8, 2014 doi:10.5296/bms.v5i2.6283 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/bms.v5i2.6283 Abstract An offset obligation is a countertrade which must be accepted in order to win the contract for a superior procurement project. This type of countertrade takes mainly place by government to government and commercial sales in the aerospace and defense business. Offset can be executed in the form of industrial, commercial and political agreements and serves essentially to meet the socio-economic objectives of the buying side. Therefore that today nearly every larger procurement project has offset obligations is the composition of the offered offset package the main distinguishing criterion between the various competitors. The value of such an offset package is accounting a multiple value of the actual procurement project. So, there are many good reasons for the successful execution of offset projects. Nevertheless we have the situation that offset projects are failing! Therefore, with view on the still large amount of outstanding offset projects, it is of great importance for the companies to know the reasons why offset projects are failing. The aim of this paper is to examine the specific circumstances of failing offset projects as part of defence procurement deals.
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution of Offset to Defence Industrialisation in Indonesia
    CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY CURIE MAHARANI SAVITRI CONTRIBUTION OF OFFSET TO DEFENCE INDUSTRIALISATION IN INDONESIA CRANFIELD DEFENCE AND SECURITY PhD THESIS Academic Year 2016 Supervisor: Professor Ron Matthews May 2016 “This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of PhD” @Cranfield University, 2014. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright holder the page is intentionally left blank ABSTRACT Offset is compensation given to a buyer country for an arms sale. Initially perceived as ‘necessary evil’ in an imperfect defence market, it now serves dual purposes: a marketing strategy for defence industry and a procurement policy for buyer country to generate add on benefits from arms import. Offsets proliferate, and so are stricter mandatory government policies. Still evaluation of offset has been difficult, mostly done in a country-based setting using anecdotal evidence that result in mixed findings. Following the issuance of mandatory offset policy in Indonesia through Law on Defence Industry in 2012, evaluation of past and current offset practice have become not only relevant but also critical to provide policy feedback. This dissertation provides an empirical examination on how offset has been understood and practised in Indonesia, and its contribution to defence industrialisation. The timeframe chosen is 1988-2014, when countertrade has been used to support the lifecycle of strategic industries: development (1988-1998), survival (1999-2009), and revitalisation (2010-2014). This study derives its validity and reliability from triangulation, comprising secondary data, survey, and case study. Three variables are analysed: technology development through ‘strategic industries’, defence offset, and defence industrialisation.
    [Show full text]
  • DEFENCE ACQUISITION International Best Practices
    DEFENCE ACQUISITION International Best Practices DEFENCE ACQUISITION International Best Practices Edited by Laxman Kumar Behera Group Captain (Retd) Vinay Kaushal INSTITUTE FOR DEFENCE STUDIES & ANALYSES NEW DELHI PENTAGON PRESS First Published in 2013 Copyright © Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, New Delhi ISBN 978-81-8274-711-1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without first obtaining written permission of the copyright owner. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this book are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, or the Government of India. Published by PENTAGON PRESS 206, Peacock Lane, Shahpur Jat, New Delhi-110049 Phones: 011-64706243, 26491568 Telefax: 011-26490600 email: [email protected] website: www.pentagonpress.in In association with Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses No. 1, Development Enclave, New Delhi-110010 Phone: +91-11-26717983 Printed at Syndicate Binders, A-20, Hosiery Complex, Phase II, Noida-201305 Contents Foreword ix Keynote Address xi Acknowledgements xiii List of Contributors xv Introduction xvii 1. Categorisation Options: User’s Dilemma 1 A.K. Nagalia 2. Challenges of Commercial Evaluation 12 Harish Masand 3. Cost Estimation for Determining Reasonable Price in Capital Acquisitions: MoD Experience 26 Rajnish Kumar 4. Towards an Optimal Procedural Framework: The Indian Experience 41 R.K. Ghose 5. Fine Tuning Procedural Framework to Achieve Balance in Defence Acquisitions 55 Alina Arora and Yohan J. Balan 6. Defence Acquisition: Indian Army’s Perspective 76 Viney Handa 7.
    [Show full text]
  • The Big Payback: How Corruption Taints Offset Agreements In
    The Big Payback: How Corruption Taints Offset Agreements in International Defense Trade By Ryan Jay Lambrecht B.A., June 1996, University of Texas at San Antonio J.D., May 1999, University of Texas at Austin A Thesis submitted to The Faculty of The George Washington University Law School in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Laws August 31, 2012 Thesis directed by Jessica Tillipman Professorial Lecturer in Law i UMI Number: 1531549 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI 1531549 Published by ProQuest LLC (2012). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346 Acknowledgements The author wishes to thank his wife, Nozomi, for her limitless understanding and support, and Dean Jessica Tillipman and Professor Susan Ringler for their insight and guidance. ii Disclaimer Major Ryan J. Lambrecht serves in the U.S. Air Force Judge Advocate General’s Corps. This paper was submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Laws in Government Procurement at The George Washington University Law School. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense or U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • NSIAD-84-102 Trade Offsets in Foreign Military Sales
    BY THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL Report To The Chairman, Subcommittee On Economic Stabilization,Committee On Banking, Finance, And Urban Affairs House Of Representatives OF THE UNITEDSTATES Trade Offsets In Foreign Military Sales Trade offsets Involve shared manufacturing by a foreign government or other arrangements armed at “offsettlng” part of the cost of a weapon system purchased from the Unlted States Various government and prtvate Industry off+ clals have expressed concern about the In- creased use and possible consequences of offsets In foreign mtlitary sales GAO was asked to review the policies, responslbllltles, and data bases of federal agencies regarding these offset arrangements This report contains information on each of these areas It also suggests that the Congress may wish to direct the admmlstratlon to Institute a poky to resist offset demands by foreign govern- ments purchasing mllltarygoodsfrom the United States when U.S assistance IS provided. GAO belleves that foreign military sales credits or . grants should not be used directly or Indirectly to expand the Industrial base of a foreign country at the expense of the U S lndustrlal base and U S jobs. Exceptions to this general rule might be made for foreign policy reasons OAO/NSlAD-84-102 APRH. 13, 7984 COMF’TROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES WASHINGTON 0.C 20648 B-214935 The Honorable John J. LaFalce Chairman, Subcommittee on Economic Stabilization Committee on Ranking, Finance and Urban Affairs House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: Your letter of July 15, 1983, requested that we review how "offsets' in foreign militarv sales (FMS) affect the defense industrial base.
    [Show full text]
  • GENERAL AGREEMENT on T/6025 TARIFFS and TRADE 22 August 1986 Limited Distribution
    RESTRICTED GENERAL AGREEMENT ON T/6025 TARIFFS AND TRADE 22 August 1986 Limited Distribution DEVELOPMENTS IN THE TRADING SYSTEM OCTOBER 1985 - MARCH 1986 Note by the Secretariat TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction ................................................................. 2 OVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS .................................................. 3 A. MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS IN TRADE POLICY I Regional developments.................................................. 6 II Sectoral developments.................................................. 9 III Other trade policy developments ........................................ 25 IV Other developments relevant to trade policy ............................ 27 V Prospective developments and current discussion on trade policy matters .............................. 30 B. NEW TARIFF AND NON-TARIFF MEASURES AND MOVEMENTS IN EXCHANGE RATES I Tariffs and related matters............................................ 33 II Generalized System of Preferences ............................... 37 III Quantitative restrictions and other non-tariff measures ..... ........ 39 IV Subsidies, anti-dumping and countervailing actions ..... ............... 49 V Movements in exchange rates ............................................ 50 C. NEW TRADE ARRANGEMENTS I Export restraint arrangements .......................................... 53 II Compensation trade .............................. 55 III Bilateral trade agreements............................................. 59 * * * APPENDICES I Notifications related to paragraph
    [Show full text]