DOCSLIB.ORG

War Profiteering and Other Contractor Crimes Committed Overseas Hearing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
War Profiteering and Other Contractor Crimes Committed Overseas Hearing WAR PROFITEERING AND OTHER CONTRACTOR CRIMES COMMITTED OVERSEAS HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON CRIME, TERRORISM, AND HOMELAND SECURITY OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JUNE 19, 2007 Serial No. 110–103 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://judiciary.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 36–173 PDF WASHINGTON : 2007 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Aug 31 2005 11:46 Aug 20, 2008 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 H:\WORK\CRIME\061907\36173.000 HJUD1 PsN: 36173 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan, Chairman HOWARD L. BERMAN, California LAMAR SMITH, Texas RICK BOUCHER, Virginia F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., JERROLD NADLER, New York Wisconsin ROBERT C. ‘‘BOBBY’’ SCOTT, Virginia HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina ELTON GALLEGLY, California ZOE LOFGREN, California BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas STEVE CHABOT, Ohio MAXINE WATERS, California DANIEL E. LUNGREN, California MARTIN T. MEEHAN, Massachusetts CHRIS CANNON, Utah WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts RIC KELLER, Florida ROBERT WEXLER, Florida DARRELL ISSA, California LINDA T. SA´ NCHEZ, California MIKE PENCE, Indiana STEVE COHEN, Tennessee J. RANDY FORBES, Virginia HANK JOHNSON, Georgia STEVE KING, Iowa LUIS V. GUTIERREZ, Illinois TOM FEENEY, Florida BRAD SHERMAN, California TRENT FRANKS, Arizona TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin LOUIE GOHMERT, Texas ANTHONY D. WEINER, New York JIM JORDAN, Ohio ADAM B. SCHIFF, California ARTUR DAVIS, Alabama DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Florida KEITH ELLISON, Minnesota PERRY APELBAUM, Staff Director and Chief Counsel JOSEPH GIBSON, Minority Chief Counsel SUBCOMMITTEE ON CRIME, TERRORISM, AND HOMELAND SECURITY ROBERT C. ‘‘BOBBY’’ SCOTT, Virginia, Chairman MAXINE WATERS, California J. RANDY FORBES, Virginia WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts LOUIE GOHMERT, Texas JERROLD NADLER, New York F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., HANK JOHNSON, Georgia Wisconsin ANTHONY D. WEINER, New York HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas STEVE CHABOT, Ohio MARTIN T. MEEHAN, Massachusetts DANIEL E. LUNGREN, California ARTUR DAVIS, Alabama TAMMY BALDWIN, Wisconsin BOBBY VASSAR, Chief Counsel MICHAEL VOLKOV, Minority Counsel (II) VerDate Aug 31 2005 11:46 Aug 20, 2008 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 0486 H:\WORK\CRIME\061907\36173.000 HJUD1 PsN: 36173 C O N T E N T S JUNE 19, 2007 Page OPENING STATEMENTS The Honorable Robert C. ‘‘Bobby’’ Scott, a Representative in Congress from the State of Virginia, and Chairman, Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security ....................................................................................... 1 The Honorable J. Randy Forbes, a Representative in Congress from the State of Virginia, and Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Crime, Ter- rorism, and Homeland Security .......................................................................... 3 WITNESSES The Honorable Stuart W. Bowen, Jr., Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, Arlington, VA Oral Testimony ..................................................................................................... 7 Prepared Statement ............................................................................................. 8 Mr. Thomas F. Gimble, Principal Deputy Inspector General, U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, DC Oral Testimony ..................................................................................................... 11 Prepared Statement ............................................................................................. 13 Mr. Barry M. Sabin, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC Oral Testimony ..................................................................................................... 27 Prepared Statement ............................................................................................. 29 Mr. Alan Grayson, Grayson & Kubli, P.C., McLean, VA Oral Testimony ..................................................................................................... 40 Prepared Statement ............................................................................................. 42 Ms. Erica Razook, Legal Advisor to the Business and HuMAN Rights Pro- gram, Amnesty International, New York, NY Oral Testimony ..................................................................................................... 44 Prepared Statement ............................................................................................. 46 Mr. Scott Horton, Adjunct Professor of Law, Columbia University School of Law, New York, NY Oral Testimony ..................................................................................................... 48 Prepared Statement ............................................................................................. 51 APPENDIX Material Submitted for the Hearing Record .......................................................... 79 (III) VerDate Aug 31 2005 11:46 Aug 20, 2008 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 H:\WORK\CRIME\061907\36173.000 HJUD1 PsN: 36173 VerDate Aug 31 2005 11:46 Aug 20, 2008 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 H:\WORK\CRIME\061907\36173.000 HJUD1 PsN: 36173 WAR PROFITEERING AND OTHER CONTRACTOR CRIMES COMMITTED OVERSEAS TUESDAY, JUNE 19, 2007 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SUBCOMMITTEE ON CRIME, TERRORISM, AND HOMELAND SECURITY COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, Washington, DC. The Subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 2:05 p.m., in Room 2141, Rayburn House Office Building, the Honorable Robert C. ‘‘Bobby’’ Scott (Chairman of the Subcommittee) presiding. Present: Representatives Scott, Delahunt, Johnson, Forbes, Coble, and Chabot. Staff Present: Bobby Vassar, Subcommittee Chief Counsel; Ameer Gopalani, Majority Counsel; Veronica Eligan, Professional Staff Member; Caroline Lynch, Minority Counsel; and Kelsey Whitlock, Minority Staff Assistant. Mr. SCOTT. The Subcommittee will come to order. I am pleased to welcome you today to the hearing before the Sub- committee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security on ‘‘War Profiteering and Other Contractor Crimes Committed Overseas.’’ Over the last 4 years, reconstruction fraud has run rampant dur- ing the engagement of U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. The United States has devoted more than $50 billion to relief and re- construction activities in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the inspectors general that are here before us today have reported that millions of these dollars still are unaccounted for. Millions may have been lost to fraud and other misconduct, and these inspectors general have opened hundreds of investigations into fraud, waste and abuse in Iraq, Kuwait and Afghanistan in- volving illegal kickbacks, bid rigging, embezzlements and fraudu- lent overbilling. In addition to the fraud, there is well-documented evidence of de- tainee abuse perpetrated by contractors as well as evidence of un- justified shootings and killings by private security contractors. Private contractors have been used to a greater extent that at any other time in our history. With the exponential use of contrac- tors comes the greater scrutiny of which laws, if any, they are ex- posed to, and we currently have a situation in which many contrac- tors act with impunity and no accountability because they operate (1) VerDate Aug 31 2005 11:46 Aug 20, 2008 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6601 H:\WORK\CRIME\061907\36173.000 HJUD1 PsN: 36173 2 outside of the physical jurisdiction of the United States and, there- fore, outside of the jurisdiction of the U.S. Criminal Code. I hope at this hearing we will be able to explore the following questions: What is the extent of the problem, why are there so few prosecutions, what are the reasons for the lack of transparency in investigations and prosecutions, and are the existing laws adequate to address these problems? With respect to the first point, considering the vast amount of evidence and investigations, there have been relatively few pros- ecutions for fraud or detainee abuse. Inspectors general before us have more than 70 open and active investigations in contracting fraud and abuse in the war. In addition, private whistleblowers have filed numerous civil claims involving Iraq fraud under the False Claims Act. Despite the breadth of all of these investigations and cases, the Department of Justice has pursued only a relatively small number of the cases, and it has not even participated at all in the whistle- blower cases. With respect to detainee abuse in Iraq, there has only been one successful prosecution of a civilian contractor, and that was for the conviction of a CIA contractor for beating a detainee who later died. Another question that arises with respect to prosecutions and in- vestigations is a lack of transparency. For example, 17 pending cases of detainee abuse, including the abuse at Abu Ghraib prison by contractors, have remained on the docket of the U.S. attorney’s office in the Eastern District of Virginia for 3 years. In some of these cases, the Army has investigated the cir- cumstances behind them and found probable cause that a crime has been committed and referred these cases to the Department of Justice
Load more

Recommended publications
  • December January the (Let's Get Rid Of
    VOLUME 7, NUMBER 6 December 2005 - January 2006 December The (Let’s Get Rid of..?) Endangered Species Act These are great times for By Rosalind Rowe, from notes by Emily B. Roberson, Ph.D. watching waterfowl on wetlands, lakes, Director, Native Plant Conservation Campaign and prairies. The Christmas Bird Count The Threatened and Endangered Species Recovery Act of 2005 (H.R. runs December 14th, 2005 to January 3824) was passed by the U.S. House of Representatives. 5th, 2006; this is its 106th year! (Try The bill removes most of the key protections for listed plants and wildlife www.audubon.org for more info.) under the Endangered Species Act and makes the listing of imperiled species Great horned and barred owls are much more difficult. Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of the bill are its courting; listen for them. restrictions on the types of science – and scientists – that would be considered Manatees congregate at natural eligible to participate in decisions about listing and conserving imperiled plants and springs and industrial warm water sites. other species. Congress is not qualified to legislate science, but HR 3824 will do Bears are still on the move, especially just that. We must get the Senate to reject this legislation. in Collier, Gulf, Hernando, Highlands, Here is how our “representatives” voted, listed by Congressional District Jefferson, Lake, Marion, and Volusia Number: counties. Along the east coast, right whales appear north of Sebastian Inlet Voted YES (GUT the Endangered Voted NO: in Brevard county. Species Act): 03 Corrine Brown (D) Dune sunflowers, some coreopsis, 01 Jeff Miller (R) 16 Mark Foley (R) wild petunia, and passionflower are 02 Allen Boyd (D) 17 Kendrick Meek (D) blooming.
    [Show full text]
  • Noncombatant Immunity and War-Profiteering
    In Oxford Handbook of Ethics of War / Published 2017 / doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199943418.001.0001 Noncombatant Immunity and War-Profiteering Saba Bazargan Department of Philosophy UC San Diego Abstract The principle of noncombatant immunity prohibits warring parties from intentionally targeting noncombatants. I explicate the moral version of this view and its criticisms by reductive individualists; they argue that certain civilians on the unjust side are morally liable to be lethally targeted to forestall substantial contributions to that war. I then argue that reductivists are mistaken in thinking that causally contributing to an unjust war is a necessary condition for moral liability. Certain noncontributing civilians—notably, war-profiteers— can be morally liable to be lethally targeted. Thus, the principle of noncombatant immunity is mistaken as a moral (though not necessarily as a legal) doctrine, not just because some civilians contribute substantially, but because some unjustly enriched civilians culpably fail to discharge their restitutionary duties to those whose victimization made the unjust enrichment possible. Consequently, the moral criterion for lethal liability in war is even broader than reductive individualists have argued. 1 In Oxford Handbook of Ethics of War / Published 2017 / doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199943418.001.0001 1. Background 1.1. Noncombatant Immunity and the Combatant’s Privilege in International Law In Article 155 of what came to be known as the ‘Lieber Code’, written in 1866, Francis Lieber wrote ‘[a]ll enemies in regular war are divided into two general classes—that is to say, into combatants and noncombatants’. As a legal matter, this distinction does not map perfectly onto the distinction between members and nonmembers of an armed force.
    [Show full text]
  • Overthrow Kinzer.Pdf
    NATIONAL BESTSELLER "A detailed, I)assionateandconvincingbook ... [wilh] lhe pace and grip ofagood lhriller." - TheNew York Tillles BookReview STEPHEN KINZER AUTHOR OF ALL THE SHAH'S MEN OVERTHROW ___________4 _____ 4 __ 111_11 __iii _2_~ __11 __ __ AMERICA'S CENTURY OF REGIME CHANGE FROM HAWAII TO IRAQ STEPHEN KINZER TIM E S BOO K S Henry Holt and Company New York Times Books Henry Holt and Company, LLC Publishers since 1866 175 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10010 www.henryholt.com Henry Holt® is a registered trademark of Henry Holt and Company, LLC. Copyright © 2006 by Stephen Kinzer All rights reserved. Distributed in Canada by H. B. Fenn and Company Ltd. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Kinzer, Stephen. Overthrow: America's century of regime change from Hawaii to Iraq I Stephen Kinzer. -1st ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-8050-8240-1 ISBN-1O: 0-8050-8240-9 1. United States-Foreign relations-20th century. 2. Hawaii-History­ Overthrow of the Monarchy, 1893.3. Iraq War, 2003- 4. Intervention (Internationallaw)-History-20th century. 5. Legitimacy of governments-History-20th century. I. Title. E744.K49 2006 327. 73009-dc22 2005054856 Henry Holt books are available for special promotions and premiums. For details contact: Director, Special Markets. Originally published in hardcover in 2006 by Times Books First Paperback Edition 2007 Designed by Kelly S. Too Printed in the United States of America 791086 Time present and time past Are both perhaps present in time future, And time future contained in time past. -T.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015-2016 Official Manual
    CHAPTER 3 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT The “Castle” ruins at Ha Ha Tonka State Park. Photo courtesy of Missouri State Archives 80 OFFICIAL MANUAL Members, President Obama’s Cabinet Joseph R. Biden, Vice President www.whitehouse.gov/vicepresident John Kerry, Secretary of State United States www.state.gov Jack Lew, Secretary, Department of the Treasury Government www.treasury.gov Ashton Carter, Secretary, Department of Defense www.defense.gov Executive Branch Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General, Department Barack H. Obama, President of the United States of Justice The White House www.usdoj.gov 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20500 Sally Jewell, Secretary, Department of the Interior Telephone: (202) 456-1414 www.doi.gov www.whitehouse.gov Thomas J. Vilsack, Secretary, Department of Agriculture The president and the vice president of the www.usda.gov United States are elected every four years by a Penny Pritzker, Secretary, Department of majority of votes cast in the Electoral College. Commerce These votes are cast by delegates from each state www.commerce.gov who traditionally vote in accordance with the Thomas E. Perez, Secretary, Department of Labor majority of the state’s voters. States have as many www.dol.gov electoral college votes as they have congressio- Sylvia Matthews Burwell, Secretary, Department nal delegates. Missouri has 10 electoral college of Health and Human Services votes—one for each of the eight U.S. Congress www.hhs.gov districts and two for the state’s two seats in the Julián Castro, Secretary, Department of Housing U.S. Senate. and Urban Development www.hud.gov The president is the chief executive of the Anthony Foxx, Secretary, Department of United States, with powers to command the Transportation armed forces, control foreign policy, grant re- www.dot.gov prieves and pardons, make certain appointments, Ernest Moniz, Secretary, Department of Energy execute all laws passed by Congress and present www.energy.gov the administration’s budget.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of the House of Representatives
    The Journal OF THE House of Representatives Number 1 Tuesday, March 6, 2001 Journal of the House of Representatives for the 103rd Regular Session since Statehood in 1845, convened under the Constitution of 1968, begun and held at the Capitol in the City of Tallahassee in the State of Florida on Tuesday, March 6, 2001, being the day fixed by the Constitution for the purpose. This being the day fixed by the Constitution for the convening of the Ausley Diaz-Balart Jordan Paul Legislature, the Members of the House of Representatives met in the Baker Dockery Joyner Peterman Chamber at 9:50 a.m. for the beginning of the 103rd Regular Session Ball Farkas Justice Pickens and were called to order by the Honorable Tom Feeney, Speaker. Barreiro Fasano Kallinger Prieguez Baxley Fields Kendrick Rich Prayer Bean Fiorentino Kilmer Richardson The following prayer was offered by the Reverend James Jennings of Bendross-Mindingall Flanagan Kosmas Ritter First United Methodist Church of Sarasota, upon invitation of Rep. Bennett Frankel Kottkamp Romeo Clarke: Bense Gannon Kravitz Ross Benson Garcia Kyle Rubio God of our beginnings and our endings, God of the Passover, Easter, Berfield Gardiner Lacasa Russell God of the pilgrims to Mecca, Alpha and Omega of the whole universe, Betancourt Gelber Lee Ryan bless this assembly with Your mercy and Your grace. We give You Bilirakis Gibson Lerner Seiler thanks for this day of new beginnings. But, O God, as we begin this day, Bowen Goodlette Littlefield Simmons our hearts are heavy for the shooting at Santana High School in Brown Gottlieb Lynn Siplin California.
    [Show full text]
  • 6:00 Pm 11 Expo Center 12 Orlando, Florida 13 14 15 16 1
    Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 REAPPORTIONMENT PUBLIC HEARING 8 9 10 AUGUST 20, 2001 - 6:00 P.M. 11 EXPO CENTER 12 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 13 14 15 16 17 18 REPORTED BY: 19 KRISTEN L. BENTLEY, COURT REPORTER 20 Division of Administrative Hearings 21 DeSoto Building 22 1230 Apalachee Parkway 23 Tallahassee, Florida 24 25 Page 2 Page 4 1 MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE 1 REPRESENTATIVE ALLEN TROVILLION 2 SENATOR GINNY BROWN-WAITE 2 REPRESENTATIVE MARK WEISSMAN 3 SENATOR LEE CONSTANTINE 3 REPRESENTATIVE FREDERICA S. WILSON 4 SENATOR ANNA P. COWIN 4 REPRESENTATIVE ROGER B. WISHNER 5 SENATOR MANDY DAWSON 5 6 SENATOR BUDDY DYER 6 7 SENATOR BETTY S. HOLZENDORF 7 8 SENATOR JAMES E. KING, JR. 8 9 SENATOR RON KLEIN 9 10 SENATOR JACK LATVALA 10 11 SENATOR JOHN F. LAURENT 11 12 SENATOR DURELL PEADEN, JR. 12 13 SENATOR BILL POSEY 13 14 SENATOR RONALD A. SILVER 14 15 SENATOR J. ALEX VILLALOBOS 15 16 SENATOR DEBBIE WASSERMAN-SCHULTZ 16 17 SENATOR DANIEL WEBSTER 17 18 REPRESENTATIVE BOB ALLEN 18 19 REPRESENTATIVE CAREY BAKER 19 20 REPRESENTATIVE GUS MICHAEL BILIRAKIS 20 21 REPRESENTATIVE RANDY BALL 21 22 REPRESENTATIVE MARSHA L. BOWEN 22 23 REPRESENTATIVE FREDERICK C. BRUMMER 23 24 REPRESENTATIVE JOHNNIE B. BYRD, JR. 24 25 REPRESENTATIVE FRANK ATTKISSON 25 Page 3 Page 5 1 REPRESENTATIVE LARRY CROW 1 PROCEEDINGS 2 REPRESENTATIVE JOYCE CUSACK 2 CHAIRMAN BYRD: The Joint Legislative Committee 3 REPRESENTATIVE DON DAVIS 3 meeting will now come to order. Thank you, ladies and 4 REPRESENTATIVE MARIO DIAZ-BALART 4 gentlemen, for coming to this meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • State Delegations
    STATE DELEGATIONS Number before names designates Congressional district. Democrats in roman; Republicans in italic; Independent in SMALL CAPS; Independent Democrat in SMALL CAPS ITALIC; Resident Commissioner and Delegates in boldface. ALABAMA SENATORS 2. Terry Everett Richard C. Shelby 3. Mike Rogers Jeff Sessions 4. Robert B. Aderholt 5. Robert E. ‘‘Bud’’ Cramer, Jr. REPRESENTATIVES 6. Spencer Bachus [Democrats 2, Republicans 5] 7. Artur Davis 1. Jo Bonner ALASKA SENATORS REPRESENTATIVE Ted Stevens [Republican 1] Lisa Murkowski At Large - Don Young ARIZONA SENATORS 2. Trent Franks John McCain 3. John B. Shadegg Jon Kyl 4. Ed Pastor 5. Harry E. Mitchell REPRESENTATIVES 6. Jeff Flake [Democrats 4, Republicans 4] 7. Rau´l M. Grijalva 1. Rick Renzi 8. Gabrielle Giffords ARKANSAS SENATORS REPRESENTATIVES Blanche L. Lincoln [Democrats 3, Republicans 1] Mark L. Pryor 1. Marion Berry 2. Vic Snyder 3. John Boozman 4. Mike Ross CALIFORNIA SENATORS 2. Wally Herger Dianne Feinstein 3. Daniel E. Lungren Barbara Boxer 4. John T. Doolittle 5. Doris O. Matsui REPRESENTATIVES 6. Lynn C. Woolsey [Democrats 33, Republicans 19] 7. George Miller 1. Mike Thompson 8. Nancy Pelosi 295 296 Congressional Directory 9. Barbara Lee 32. Hilda L. Solis 10. Ellen O. Tauscher 33. Diane E. Watson 11. Jerry McNerney 34. Lucille Roybal-Allard 12. Tom Lantos 35. Maxine Waters 13. Fortney Pete Stark 36. Jane Harman 14. Anna G. Eshoo 37. —— 1 15. Michael M. Honda 38. Grace F. Napolitano 16. Zoe Lofgren 39. Linda T. Sa´nchez 17. Sam Farr 40. Edward R. Royce 18. Dennis A. Cardoza 41. Jerry Lewis George Radanovich 19.
    [Show full text]
  • House Resolution on the Appropriate Role of Foreign Judgements in the Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States: Hearing Before the Subcomm
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2005 House Resolution on the Appropriate Role of Foreign Judgements in the Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States: Hearing Before the Subcomm. on the Constitution, H. Comm. on the Judiciary, 109th Cong., July 19, 2005 (Statement of Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz, Prof. of Law, Geo. U. L. Center) Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] CIS-No.: 2005-H521-48 This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cong/20 This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cong Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Courts Commons, and the International Law Commons HOUSE RESOLUTION ON THE APPROPRIATE ROLE OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS IN THE INTERPRETA- TION OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE CONSTITUTION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON H. Res. 97 JULY 19, 2005 Serial No. 109–40 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://judiciary.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 22–494 PDF WASHINGTON : 2005 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 12:54 Sep 01, 2005 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 G:\WORK\CONST\071905B\22494.000 HJUD1 PsN: 22494 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY F.
    [Show full text]
  • Noncombatant Immunity and War-Profiteering
    In Oxford Handbook of Ethics of War / Published 2017 / doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199943418.001.0001 Noncombatant Immunity and War-Profiteering Saba Bazargan Department of Philosophy UC San Diego Abstract The principle of noncombatant immunity prohibits warring parties from intentionally targeting noncombatants. I explicate the moral version of this view and its criticisms by reductive individualists; they argue that certain civilians on the unjust side are morally liable to be lethally targeted to forestall substantial contributions to that war. I then argue that reductivists are mistaken in thinking that causally contributing to an unjust war is a necessary condition for moral liability. Certain noncontributing civilians—notably, war-profiteers— can be morally liable to be lethally targeted. Thus, the principle of noncombatant immunity is mistaken as a moral (though not necessarily as a legal) doctrine, not just because some civilians contribute substantially, but because some unjustly enriched civilians culpably fail to discharge their restitutionary duties to those whose victimization made the unjust enrichment possible. Consequently, the moral criterion for lethal liability in war is even broader than reductive individualists have argued. 1 In Oxford Handbook of Ethics of War / Published 2017 / doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199943418.001.0001 1. Background 1.1. Noncombatant Immunity and the Combatant’s Privilege in International Law In Article 155 of what came to be known as the ‘Lieber Code’, written in 1866, Francis Lieber wrote ‘[a]ll enemies in regular war are divided into two general classes—that is to say, into combatants and noncombatants’. As a legal matter, this distinction does not map perfectly onto the distinction between members and nonmembers of an armed force.
    [Show full text]
  • The Securities Arbitration System Hearing Committee
    THE SECURITIES ARBITRATION SYSTEM HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON CAPITAL MARKETS, INSURANCE AND GOVERNMENT SPONSORED ENTERPRISES OF THE COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 17, 2005 Printed for the use of the Committee on Financial Services Serial No. 109–11 ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 24–398 PDF WASHINGTON : 2005 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 10:25 Nov 18, 2005 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 G:\DOCS\24398.TXT FIN1 PsN: MICAH HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES MICHAEL G. OXLEY, Ohio, Chairman JAMES A. LEACH, Iowa BARNEY FRANK, Massachusetts RICHARD H. BAKER, Louisiana PAUL E. KANJORSKI, Pennsylvania DEBORAH PRYCE, Ohio MAXINE WATERS, California SPENCER BACHUS, Alabama CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York MICHAEL N. CASTLE, Delaware LUIS V. GUTIERREZ, Illinois PETER T. KING, New York NYDIA M. VELA´ ZQUEZ, New York EDWARD R. ROYCE, California MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York ROBERT W. NEY, Ohio DARLENE HOOLEY, Oregon SUE W. KELLY, New York, Vice Chair JULIA CARSON, Indiana RON PAUL, Texas BRAD SHERMAN, California PAUL E. GILLMOR, Ohio GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York JIM RYUN, Kansas BARBARA LEE, California STEVEN C. LATOURETTE, Ohio DENNIS MOORE, Kansas DONALD A. MANZULLO, Illinois MICHAEL E. CAPUANO, Massachusetts WALTER B. JONES, JR., North Carolina HAROLD E.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Perceptions of War Profiteers Ezra Chaskelson Advisor
    Changing Perceptions of War Profiteers Ezra Chaskelson Advisor: Philip Brenner Spring 2008 University Honors in International Studies Chaskelson 2 You, sir, are a snake in the grass. You are the sludge of the Earth, a stain on society, the banality of evil, and your presence disgusts me. You are a war profiteer. The act of war profiteering traditionally entails earning profits by selling weapons, goods, or services to fighting parties during times of war. Society reserved a very special feeling of contempt for those profiting from America’s military struggles against the tyrannies of evil during the early twentieth century, but the past few decades have witnessed changing values. This paper examines the change over time of the American public’s opinion of war profiteers through the expression of popular media such as newspapers, movies, and political cartoons. Under examination is the occupation of war profiteer’s transformation from one of individual, unbridled opportunism coupled with abysmal moral integrity to ambitiously savvy businessman or even entrepreneurial patriot in some cases. Why is it that fifty years ago someone engaging in war profiteering was considered scum of the earth, while today people clamor for the same jobs? Perceptions, values, and even terminology have all changed. War profiteering is rarely called by its name anymore, and even when the term is used it hardly elicits the outrage one would expect from such acts. Society’s values, it seems, have changed. Profiting from war is no longer looked down upon as it once was; rather, profiting excessively is the new stigma. Only when overcharging for services or failing to deliver on promises occurs is there public outcry, and even then it seems to quickly fade from public memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of Remarks E233 HON. BART STUPAK HON. TOM FEENEY HON. JAMES T. WALSH HON. MICHAEL N. CASTLE
    February 15, 2005 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks E233 Also, the bill does not require banks to issue Peninsula representative. In this new role, he she serves as a respected leader of this very ‘‘substitute checks’’ under the Check 21 law will be helping local governments reduce their important organization. The Hibernians clearly without any fee; instead it simply says that if personal and liability risks while better serving recognized the talent of this special person. I the bank decides to charge for the substitute their residents. must also acknowledge with pride her con- check, then the bank cannot insist that the Mr. Speaker, I ask the House of Represent- tinuing role as both mother and grandmother consumer get that document in order to exer- atives to join me in thanking First Lieutenant to her three children and two grandchildren. cise the consumer’s right to a ten business Kevin R. Denecke for his 25 years of service They are very proud of her with good reason. day timeframe to get back funds lost due to a to the people of the State of Michigan and in It is an honor and a privilege to recognize check processing problem, such as a check wishing him well in his new position. His com- the dedication of Anne Marie Ferguson to the being paid twice. mitment to community and to justice have Ladies Ancient Order of Hibernians State Banks benefit from faster check-processing been a model of public service. He will be Board of New York State. Her service and facilitated by Check 21.
    [Show full text]