DOCSLIB.ORG

Access-Network-ANGS-Study-Main

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Access-Network-ANGS-Study-Main 2 Produced for the South Downs National Park Authority by Associates from the Environment X Change. www.environmentxchange.co.uk Main Authors GIS Analyst Sharon Bayne BSc MSc MCIEEM Val Hyland BA Dip LA (Hons) PGCert. UD Megan Davies BSc MSc Blackwood Bayne Ltd, 8 Herts Crescent, Val Hyland Consulting [email protected] Loose, Maidstone, Kent ME15 0AX Silverthorn, Scotton Street, Wye, Kent 07745 130062 s [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 01622 746316 01233 812195 Contributing Authors Lynnette Leeson BSc (Hons), Dip TP. M.R.T.P.I. Andrea Byerley BA(Hons) MSc Hares Landscape and Planning, Dale Cottage, Byerley Ltd, 8 The Mount, High Street, Bidborough, West Burton, West Sussex RH20 1HD Tunbridge Wells, Kent [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 01892 529541 Acknowledgements This study would not have been possible without the input and support from many people across the study area. The authors would like to thank the many people who contributed time, data and knowledge to this study. These include officers from the SDNPA (Ray Drabble, Nick Heasman, Bruce Middleton, Jeremy Burgess, Nigel James, Chris Paterson, Allison Thorpe and other members of the project steering group), Natural England (Marian Ashdown, Angela Marlow, Jenny Bowen), Sussex Wildlife Trust (Janyis Watson, Laura Brook), Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust (Clive Chatters), National Trust (Jane Cecil), Steve Lees (Test Valley) for information on PUSH and the many officers from the study area districts who provided information and data. 3 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Accessible Natural Greenspace ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Health and Other Socio-Economic Factors ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 10 Development .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Recreation and Biodiversity ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 The Access and Public Transport Network .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 15 The Coast ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Review of Sub-Regional Green Infrastructure Policy and Delivery - ‘PUSH’ Area ............................................................................................................................... 17 Part 1 – Introduction and Background ............................................................................................................................................................. 18 Scope and Purpose of the Study ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Study Area ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Structure of this Report .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 Part 2 – Analyses ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 Accessible Natural Greenspace ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24 Analyses ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 26 Summary of Key Points .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 45 Discussion ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 46 Health and Other Socio-Economic Factors .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 47 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 47 Data Sources - Health ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 48 Data Sources – Socio-Economic Factors .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 49 Analyses - Health .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 49 4 Analyses – Other Socio–Economic Factors ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 53 Discussion ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 60 Development ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 61 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61 Analyses ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 62 Existing Major Populations .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 69 Population Projections .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 69 Discussion ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Habitats Regulations Assessment June 2021
    Horsham Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Horsham District Council July 2021 Horsham Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Damiano Weitowitz James Riley Max Wade James Riley Consultant Ecologist Technical Director Technical Director Technical Director Isla Hoffmann Heap Senior Ecologist Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 0 13/10/20 Emerging draft JR James Riley Technical to inform plan Director development 1 18/12/20 Updated to JR James Riley Technical assess Director Regulation 19 LP. 2 15/01/2021 Update JR James Riley Technical following client Director comments 3 30/06/21 Further update JR James Riley Technical Director Distribution List # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name Prepared for: Horsham District Council AECOM Horsham Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Prepared for: Horsham District Council Prepared by: AECOM Limited Midpoint, Alencon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom T: +44(0)1256 310200 aecom.com © 2021 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: Horsham District Council AECOM Horsham Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Table of Contents Executive Summary........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • South Downs Integrated Landscape Character Assessment
    K2 D4a H6 J1 E4 L3 D3a C1 A5 N1 H6 O1 D3a O2 E4 D1b K1 D2a L2 L2 M1 N1 L2 E3 N1 D1a D2b D2b H5 M1 M1 D2b L2 J2 L2 D2b K1 H4 D2b B2 L1 D2a P1 F4 I3 D2a I3 P1 B3 E1 H3 B1 E2 A3 G4 G4 Q1 Q1 Landscape Character Areas Q1 Q1 D1a South Winchester Downland Mosaic (Enclosed) B4 D1b South Winchester Downland Mosaic (Open) D2a Hambledon and Clanfield Downland Mosaic (Enclosed) D2b Hambledon and Clanfield Downland Mosaic (Open) D3a Bramdean and Cheriton Downland Mosaic (Enclosed) D4a Newton Valence Downland Mosaic (Enclosed) D: Downland Mosaic K2 H6 J1 E4 D4a L3 D3a C1 A5 N1 H6 O1 D3a O2 E4 D1b K1 D2a L2 L2 M1 N1 L2 E3 N1 D1a D2b D2b H5 M1 M1 D2b L2 J2 L2 D2b K1 H4 D2b B2 L1 D2a P1 F4 I3 D2a I3 P1 B3 E1 H3 E2 B1 A3 G4 G4 Q1 Q1 Q1 Q1 Historic Landscape Character B4 Fieldscapes Woodland Unenclosed Valley Floor Designed Landscapes 0101-Fieldscapes Assarts 0201-Post 1800 Woodland 04-Unenclosed 06-Valley Floor 09-Designed Landscapes 0102-Early Enclosures 0202- Pre1800 Woodland Settlement Industry Military 0103- Recent Enclosures Horticulture 0501- Pre 1800 Settlement 08-Industry 10-Military 0104-Modern Fields 03-Horticulture 0502- Post 1800 Expansion Recreation Settlement 13-Recreation D: Downland Mosaic LANDSCAPE TYPE D: DOWNLAND MOSAIC D.1 The Downland Mosaic landscape type comprises an area of chalk downland at the western end of the South Downs, forming part of a broad area of chalk downland which extends westwards beyond Winchester to the Dorset Downs and Salisbury Plain, and north to Basingstoke.
    [Show full text]
  • Landowner Deposits Register
    Register of Landowner Deposits under Highways Act 1980 and Commons Act 2006 The first part of this register contains entries for all CA16 combined deposits received since 1st October 2013, and these all have scanned copies of the deposits attached. The second part of the register lists entries for deposits made before 1st October 2013, all made under section 31(6) of the Highways Act 1980. There are a large number of these, and the only details given here currently are the name of the land, the parish and the date of the deposit. We will be adding fuller details and scanned documents to these entries over time. List of deposits made - last update 12 January 2017 CA16 Combined Deposits Deposit Reference: 44 - Land at Froyle (The Mrs Bootle-Wilbrahams Will Trust) Link to Documents: http://documents.hants.gov.uk/countryside/Deposit44-Bootle-WilbrahamsTrustLand-Froyle-Scan.pdf Details of Depositor Details of Land Crispin Mahony of Savills on behalf of The Parish: Froyle Mrs Bootle-WilbrahamWill Trust, c/o Savills (UK) Froyle Jewry Chambers,44 Jewry Street, Winchester Alton Hampshire Hampshire SO23 8RW GU34 4DD Date of Statement: 14/11/2016 Grid Reference: 733.416 Deposit Reference: 98 - Tower Hill, Dummer Link to Documents: http://documents.hants.gov.uk/rightsofway/Deposit98-LandatTowerHill-Dummer-Scan.pdf Details of Depositor Details of Land Jamie Adams & Madeline Hutton Parish: Dummer 65 Elm Bank Gardens, Up Street Barnes, Dummer London Basingstoke SW13 0NX RG25 2AL Date of Statement: 27/08/2014 Grid Reference: 583. 458 Deposit Reference:
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Field Trips Programme – Hampshire
    2016 Field Trips Programme – Hampshire The Branch is grateful to the site owners/managers of the nature reserves visited for maintaining public access and safeguarding these very special places of wildlife interest. The grid reference given is for the parking location/meeting point. Sunday 1 MayMay,, mmmeetmeet at 10:30am Catherington Down (SU690143(SU690143),), site: Hampshire County Council Leader: Ashley Whitlock, Tel: 02392 731266; Mobile: 07752 182340 Directions: meet in Lovedean Lane. LLeaveeave the A3(M) at Junction 2, taking the B2149 towards HorndeanHorndean,,,, pass Morrison’s and keep ahead into Catherington LLane.ane. Turn left at Roads Hill and then right into Lovedean LaneLane;; parkpark in Lovedean LLane.ane. A chance to see a lesser known site in the MeoMeonn Valley with good floraflora and faunafauna.... Aiming to see: Brimstone, Orange Tip and other early butterflies and moths Saturday 7 MayMay,, mmmeetmeet at 10:30am Little Butser Hill (SU711200) Leader: Ashley Whitlock, Tel: 02392 731266; Mobile: 07752 182340 Directions: Butser Hill is well signposted from the A3(M) at Clanfield. Meet at Butser Hill car park (Pay & Display)Display).. A chance to visvisitit another area of Butser with a substantisubstantialal Duke of Burgundy colony, to see Skylarks and BuzBuzzards,zards, and take in spectacular views towards Ashford Hill and the MeMeonon Valley. Very steepsteep in places. BBringring Lunch as we will be visiting another part of Butser in the afternoon. Aiming to see: Duke of Burgundy, Dingy and Grizzled Skipper, Small Heath, early moths Saturday 14 MayMay,, mmmeetmeet at 10:30am Stockbridge Down (SU375346), site: National Trust Leader: Ashley Whitlock, Tel: 02392 731266; Mobile: 07752 182340 Directions: Stockbridge Down is 1 mile east of StockbridgeStockbridge and 6 miles west of Winchester on the B3049B3049.
    [Show full text]
  • Coarse Fishing Close Season on English Rivers
    Coarse fishing close season on English rivers Appendix 1 – Current coarse fish close season arrangements The close season on different waters In England, there is a coarse fish close season on all rivers, some canals and some stillwaters. This has not always been the case. In the 1990s, only around 60% of the canal network had a close season and in some regions, the close season had been dispensed with on all stillwaters. Stillwaters In 1995, following consultation, government confirmed a national byelaw which retained the coarse fish close season on rivers, streams, drains and canals, but dispensed with it on most stillwaters. The rationale was twofold: • Most stillwaters are discrete waterbodies in single ownership. Fishery owners can apply bespoke angling restrictions to protect their stocks, including non-statutory close times. • The close season had been dispensed with on many stillwaters prior to 1995 without apparent detriment to those fisheries. This presented strong evidence in favour of removing it. The close season is retained on some Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) and the Norfolk and Suffolk Broads, as a precaution against possible damage to sensitive wildlife - see Appendix 1. This consultation is not seeking views on whether the close season should be retained on these stillwaters While most stillwater fishery managers have not re-imposed their own close season rules, some have, either adopting the same dates as apply to rivers or tailoring them to their waters' specific needs. Canals The Environment Agency commissioned a research project in 1997 to examine the evidence around the close season on canals to identify whether or not angling during the close season was detrimental to canal fisheries.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 2A: Biodiversity Audit
    Biodiversity Action Plan for East Hampshire Section 2a: Biodiversity Audit Section 2: Biodiversity Data - 1 - Biodiversity Action Plan for East Hampshire Introduction Biodiversity in East Hampshire is currently, and has been for centuries, extremely varied, due to the diverse geology and ancient history of natural and human processes occurring on the land. The district’s landscapes and the habitats and species they host are outlined in Section 1. Given below is a more detailed account of the extent, distribution and condition of the district’s biodiversity, using the best available knowledge. Habitats Shown below are maps of the district, showing each habitat type – these are derived from a county-wide programme to assess habitat types, using data held by Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre. Also at county-wide level are A Biodiversity Action Plan for Hampshire’s Habitat Action Plans (HAPs) (www.hampshirebiodiversity.org.uk/vol-two.html ). These plans outline priority actions for each habitat type, which have been translated into district-level action in Section 3 through consultation with partners. • All mapped habitats correspond with the Priority Habitats in A Biodiversity Action Plan for Hampshire except: o Arable o Improved Grassland o Coniferous woodland o Urban The maps show that Hampshire’s priority habitats such as calcareous grassland are fragmented and small in area compared to agricultural and urban land uses, but that these fragments correspond to the familiar landscapes in the district such as chalk downland. Other habitat types, such as the mosaic of Wealden heathland and acidic grasslands in the north-east of the area, are larger and in closer proximity to each other.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 Duncton to Bignor Escarpment SAC
    Submitted to Client: Submitted by: South Downs National Park AECOM Authority Midpoint Alençon Link Basingstoke Hampshire RG21 7PP United Kingdom South Downs National Park Authority Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment July 2018 AECOM South Downs National Park Authority Page ii Prepared by: Isla Hoffmann Heap Checked by: Dr James Riley Senior Ecologist Technical Director Approved by: Dr James Riley Associate Director Rev No Comments Checked Approved Date by by 0 DRAFT IHH JR 05/05/17 1 Following client comments IHH JR 30/06/17 2 Incorporating air quality impact assessment IHH JR 01/08/17 3 Updated to address Pre-Submission Local Plan and IHH JR 13/09/17 incorporate air quality analysis for Ashdown Forest SAC 4 Update to reflect Consultation Comments and policy update IHH JR 16/03/18 5 New report produced in response to Sweetman European MK JR 24/07/18 Court of Justice ruling Midpoint, Alençon Link, Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG21 7PP, United Kingdom Telephone: 01256 310 200 Website: http://www.aecom.com July 2018 Limitations South Downs National Park Authority Local Plan Habitats Regulations July 2018 Assessment AECOM South Downs National Park Authority Page iii AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of the South Downs National Park Authority (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by AECOM. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client nor relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM.
    [Show full text]
  • Winchester District Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Scoping Report
    Winchester City Council Winchester District Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Scoping Report Final report Prepared by LUC July 2020 Winchester City Council Winchester District Local Plan Habitats Regulations Assessment Scoping Report Project Number 11113 Version Status Prepared Checked Approved Date 1. Draft for client comment K. Sydney T. Livingston T. Livingston 26.06.2020 2. Final for consultation K. Sydney T. Livingston T. Livingston 07.07.2020 Bristol Land Use Consultants Ltd Landscape Design Edinburgh Registered in England Strategic Planning & Assessment Glasgow Registered number 2549296 Development Planning Lancaster Registered office: Urban Design & Masterplanning London 250 Waterloo Road Environmental Impact Assessment Manchester London SE1 8UL Landscape Planning & Assessment Landscape Management landuse.co.uk 100% recycled paper Ecology Historic Environment GIS & Visualisation Contents Winchester District Local Plan HRA Scoping Report July 2020 Contents Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Background to the Local Plan 1 The requirement to undertake Habitats Regulations Assessment of Development Plans 2 Stages of HRA 2 Recent case law changes 4 Previous HRA work 5 Structure of this report 5 Chapter 2 Approach to HRA 6 Screening methodology 6 Appropriate Assessment 9 Chapter 3 Scope of HRA 11 European sites that may be affected by the Local Plan 11 Potential broad impacts from the Local Plan 18 Chapter 4 Next Steps 21 Appendix A Attributes of European Sites with the potential to be affected by the Local Plan A-1 Appendix B Other plans and projects with the potential for in-combination effects B-1 LUC I i -Chapter 1 Introduction Winchester District Local Plan HRA Scoping Report July 2020 Chapter 1 Introduction An introduction to Habitats Regulations Assessment and the Winchester District Local Plan LUC has been commissioned by Winchester City Council to carry out a Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) of its emerging Local Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • 120. Wealden Greensand Area Profile: Supporting Documents
    National Character 120. Wealden Greensand Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 120. Wealden Greensand Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment 1 2 3 White Paper , Biodiversity 2020 and the European Landscape Convention , we are North revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas (NCAs). These are areas East that share similar landscape characteristics, and which follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision- Yorkshire making framework for the natural environment. & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform their West decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a landscape East scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage broader Midlands partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will also help West Midlands to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. East of England Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key London drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental Opportunity (SEOs) are South East suggested, which draw on this integrated information. The SEOs offer guidance South West on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Strategic Sites
    8. STRATEGIC SITES Introduction 8.1 This chapter sets out the policies for the strategic sites within the National Park. These sites represent one-off opportunities for developments of exceptional quality. They have the potential to make a substantial contribution towards sustainable growth and deliver multiple ecosystems services, which in turn promotes the National Park’s purposes and helps to achieve the vision set out in this Plan. The strategic sites are: Shoreham Cement Works, Upper Beading; and North Street Quarter and adjacent East gate area, Lewes. 8.2 Whilst the former ‘Syngenta’ site in Fernhurst is also a strategic site, it has already been allocated for a sustainable mixed-use development incorporating residential (approximately 200 homes), commercial development and other suitable uses in the Fernhurst Neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP), which was made in 2016. 8.3 This chapter identifies how the strategic sites can collectively and individually contribute to meeting the National Park’s purposes, and how their development could be justified by exceptional circumstances and be in the public interest, in accordance with Policy SD3: Major Development in the South Downs National Park. 8.4 There are also three strategic housing allocations, these are set out with all the other allocations in Chapter 10. Land at Old Malling Farm in Lewes (Allocation Policy SD77) is a greenfield site that will make a significant contribution to meeting the unmet housing need of Lewes and was originally allocated in the Lewes Joint Core Strategy. The Depot / Brickworks site and former Holmbush Caravan Park, both located in Midhurst and both brownfield sites, will contribute significantly to the unmet housing need of Midhurst.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Ornithological Interest of Sssis in England
    Natural England Research Report NERR015 A review of the ornithological interest of SSSIs in England www.naturalengland.org.uk Natural England Research Report NERR015 A review of the ornithological interest of SSSIs in England Allan Drewitt, Tristan Evans and Phil Grice Natural England Published on 31 July 2008 The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. You may reproduce as many individual copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with Natural England, 1 East Parade, Sheffield, S1 2ET ISSN 1754-1956 © Copyright Natural England 2008 Project details This report results from research commissioned by Natural England. A summary of the findings covered by this report, as well as Natural England's views on this research, can be found within Natural England Research Information Note RIN015 – A review of bird SSSIs in England. Project manager Allan Drewitt - Ornithological Specialist Natural England Northminster House Peterborough PE1 1UA [email protected] Contractor Natural England 1 East Parade Sheffield S1 2ET Tel: 0114 241 8920 Fax: 0114 241 8921 Acknowledgments This report could not have been produced without the data collected by the many thousands of dedicated volunteer ornithologists who contribute information annually to schemes such as the Wetland Bird Survey and to their county bird recorders. We are extremely grateful to these volunteers and to the organisations responsible for collating and reporting bird population data, including the British Trust for Ornithology, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, the Joint Nature Conservancy Council seabird team, the Rare Breeding Birds Panel and the Game and Wildlife Conservancy Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • Sussex Bat Special Area of Conservation Planning and Landscape Scale Enhancement Protocol
    Sussex Bat Special Area of Conservation Planning and Landscape Scale Enhancement Protocol Aim of the protocol The aim of this joint document is to: Facilitate sustainable development; and Secure a diverse and healthy landscape for bats, people and other wildlife It builds upon Policy SD10 within the South Downs National Park Local Plan and will support the biodiversity, green infrastructure and dark skies aspirations within the local plan. By following the guidance in this protocol, the South Downs National Park Authority can ensure that the bat populations associated with The Mens, Ebernoe Common and Singleton and Cocking Tunnels Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) thrive and development around the SACs avoids impacts on them, thereby preventing delays during their consideration at the planning stage. The protocol provides guidance on: measures to avoid impacts to bats associated with the SACs, when surveys may be needed landscape- scale conservation opportunities that are required to maintain the integrity of the SACs and the populations of Bechstein’s and barbastelle bats. Through securing developer contributions from major schemes and working closely with existing and future land management incentives the joint vision is to deliver an integrated conservation strategy for bats and will also deliver much wider benefits for people and wildlife. Introduction Sussex has a diverse landscape with significant areas of linked woodland, riparian habitat and grassland areas which support internationally important populations of bats at a number of sites; particularly within three Special Areas of Conservation (SACs). The Sussex Bat SACs The Sussex Bat SACs include a suite of three SACs in which the qualifying features are the population of the bats using the SAC as a roost.
    [Show full text]