DOCSLIB.ORG

Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus Tshawytscha) Adult Abundance Monitoring in the Secesh River and Lake Creek, Idaho in 2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus Tshawytscha) Adult Abundance Monitoring in the Secesh River and Lake Creek, Idaho in 2005 Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Adult Abundance Monitoring in the Secesh River and Lake Creek, Idaho Annual Report 2005 June 2006 DOE/BP-00020615-1 This Document should be cited as follows: Kucera, Paul, Rick Orme, "Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Adult Abundance Monitoring in the Secesh River and Lake Creek, Idaho", 2005 Annual Report, Project No. 199703000, 106 electronic pages, (BPA Report DOE/BP-00020615-1) Bonneville Power Administration P.O. Box 3621 Portland, OR 97208 This report was funded by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), U.S. Department of Energy, as part of BPA's program to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife affected by the development and operation of hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia River and its tributaries. The views in this report are the author's and do not necessarily represent the views of BPA. Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Adult Abundance Monitoring in Lake Creek and Secesh River, Idaho in 2005 Annual Report January 2005 – December 2005 Prepared by: Paul A. Kucera and Rick W. Orme Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management Lapwai, ID 83540 Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Environment, Fish and Wildlife P.O. Box 3621 Portland, OR 97208-3621 Project Number 199703000 Contract Number 00020615 June 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................. i CHAPTER 1 Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Adult Abundance Monitoring in Lake Creek....................................................................................................1 ABSTRACT.....................................................................................................................................2 TABLE OF CONTENTS.................................................................................................................4 LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................................5 LIST OF TABLES...........................................................................................................................7 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...............................................................................................................9 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................10 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AREA..........................................................................................12 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................14 TIMING AND ABUNDANCE..................................................................................................14 Equipment .............................................................................................................................. 14 Procedure................................................................................................................................ 15 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION....................................................................................................20 ABUNDANCE ...........................................................................................................................20 POTENTIAL SOURCE OF ERRORS IN UNDERWATER VIDEO MONITORING ..........................................................................................................................24 MIGRATION TIMING..............................................................................................................25 Chinook Salmon..................................................................................................................... 25 Bull Trout............................................................................................................................... 28 REDD COUNTS ........................................................................................................................29 FISH PER REDD .......................................................................................................................32 ACCURACY OF REDD COUNT EXPANSIONS ...................................................................35 STREAM TEMPERATURE AND DISCHARGE ....................................................................39 RECOMMENDATIONS...............................................................................................................40 LITERATURE CITED ..................................................................................................................41 APPENDIX A................................................................................................................................46 CHAPTER 2 Use of Dual Frequency Identification Sonar to Determine Adult Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Abundance in the Secesh River.............................58 ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................................59 TABLE OF CONTENTS...............................................................................................................60 LIST OF TABLES.........................................................................................................................61 LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................................62 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................................63 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................64 DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA .............................................................................................65 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................65 Dual Frequency Identification Sonar (DIDSON) Operation......................................................68 DIDSON Motion Detection........................................................................................................70 Abundance Estimation................................................................................................................71 Validation ...................................................................................................................................76 Listed Chinook Salmon Population Assessment........................................................................77 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION....................................................................................................77 i Abundance Estimation................................................................................................................77 Potential Sources of Error in DIDSON Abundance Monitoring................................................79 Migration Timing .......................................................................................................................81 Validation Monitoring................................................................................................................82 DIDSON Operations ..................................................................................................................83 LISTED CHINOOK SALMON POPULATION STATUS ..........................................................85 RECOMMENDATIONS...............................................................................................................87 LITERATURE CITED ..................................................................................................................89 APPENDIX B ................................................................................................................................93 ii CHAPTER 1 Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) Adult Abundance Monitoring in Lake Creek Annual Report January 2005 – December 2005 Prepared by: Paul A. Kucera and Rick W. Orme Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management Lapwai, ID 83540 Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Environment, Fish and Wildlife P.O. Box 3621 Portland, OR 97208-3621 Project Number 199703000 Contract Number 00020615 June 2006 ABSTRACT Underwater time lapse video technology was used to determine tributary specific adult spring and summer chinook salmon abundance in Lake Creek in 2005. In 2005, the first upstream salmon passage occurred on June 25, 14 days after installation of the fish counting station. Total wild and hatchery salmon abundance in Lake Creek was 140 fish, with 95% confidence intervals of ± 2 fish. Wild salmon abundance was estimated to be 138 adults. Estimated hatchery fish composition represented 1.5% of the spawning population. Chinook salmon jacks comprised an estimated 5.3% of the run. There was an estimated 1.77 fish per redd in Lake Creek in 2005. The salmon spawning migration in Lake Creek occurred from June 25 to September 4 with a total of 576 fish passages observed at the fish counting station. Median net upstream salmon passage was observed on July 13, and the maximum number of net upstream migrating salmon were in the Lake Creek system by August 23. Adult salmon moved freely upstream and downstream through the fish
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Management Area 12 South Fork Salmon River
    Chapter III South Fork Salmon River Management Area 12 III - 240 Chapter III South Fork Salmon River Management Area 12 Management Area 12 South Fork Salmon River MANAGEMENT AREA DESCRIPTION Management Prescriptions - Management Area 12 has the following management prescriptions (see map on preceding page for distribution of prescriptions). Percent of Management Prescription Category (MPC) Mgt. Area 1.2 – Recommended Wilderness 48 2.2 – Research Natural Areas 1 3.1 – Passive Restoration and Maintenance of Aquatic, Terrestrial & Hydrologic Resources 32 3.2 – Active Restoration and Maintenance of Aquatic, Terrestrial & Hydrologic Resources 16 4.1a - Undeveloped Recreation: Maintain Inventoried Roadless Areas 2 4.1c – Undeveloped Rec.: Maintain Unroaded Character with Allowance for Restoration 1 General Location and Description - Management Area 12 is comprised of lands administered by the Payette National Forest within the South Fork Salmon River drainage, excluding Wilderness lands, the Upper Secesh River, and the upper East Fork South Fork (see map, preceding page). Management Area 12 includes the area near the confluence of the South Fork Salmon River and the Main Salmon River known as Mackay Bar. The management area lies in Idaho and Valley Counties, and is part of the McCall and Krassel Ranger Districts. The management area is an estimated 362,800 acres, which includes several small private inholdings (about 1 percent of the area, total), most of which are along the river corridor. Management Area 12 does not include portions of the Frank Church-River of No Return Wilderness, and the Upper Secesh River and Upper East Fork South Fork Watersheds that are also in the South Fork Salmon River drainage.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery Program
    Final Environmental Impact Statement Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery Program Bonneville Power Administration U.S. Department of Energy Bureau of Indian Affairs U.S. Department of the Interior Nez Perce Tribe July 1997 Final Environmental Impact Statement Responsible Agencies: U.S. Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration (BPA); U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA); Nez Perce Tribe (NPT). Title of Proposed Action: Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery Program. States Involved: Idaho. Abstract: Bonneville Power Administration, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and the Nez Perce Tribe propose a supplementation program to restore chinook salmon to the Clearwater River Subbasin in Idaho. The Clearwater River is a tributary to the Snake River, which empties into the Columbia River. The Final EIS includes a new alternative suggested by commentors to the Draft EIS. In the Proposed Action, the Nez Perce Tribe would build and operate two central incubation and rearing hatcheries and six satellite facilities. Spring and fall chinook salmon would be reared and acclimated to different areas in the Subbasin and released at the hatchery and satellite sites or in other watercourses throughout the Subbasin. The supplementation program differs from other hatchery programs because the fish would be released at different sizes and would return to reproduce naturally in the areas where they are released. The Use of Existing Facilities Alternative proposes using existing production hatcheries and the proposed satellite facilities to meet the need. Facilities at Dworshak National Fish Hatchery, Kooskia National Fish Hatchery, and Hagerman National Fish Hatchery would be used as central incubation and rearing facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon Subbasin Management Plan May 2004
    Salmon Subbasin Management Plan May 2004 Coeur d'Alene #S LEWIS WASHINGTON #SMoscow MONTANA NEZ Lewiston #S #S PERCE #S #S OREGON Boise Sun Valley # #S #S Grangeville #S Idaho Falls WYOMING S IDAHO #S a #S Pocatello l m Twin Falls o IDAHO n R i v e r r e v # i . Dixie R k F Salmon River n . Riggins o # N Towns # m l n a erlai S Counties r mb e ha Sa C lmon R v ek iver i re Major streams R C d i p Watershed (HUC) boundaries a L i Salmon R t t r l # e e Big LEMHI . v Cre S i e k k r e a F R k v New l . e i m n e S o r R L o m C e n l r n o m a Meadows R e # S h h t m i l v i n a e a R ADAMS r S P i VALLEY v # e Mid Fk r Yellow Lodge # Pine r e # iv R P n a Leadore o hs lm im a Challis e S ro k # i F R i id ve M r iver on R Stanley Salm # S r a e l v m i R o n n o R lm iv e a S r . k F . E CUSTER 100 1020304050Miles Galena # BLAINE Compiled by IDFG, CDC, 2001 Written by Ecovista Contracted by Nez Perce Tribe Watershed Division and Shoshone-Bannock Tribes Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................6 1.1 Contract Entities and Plan Participants.............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4 References
    4 References Agricultural Extension Office. 2000. Sedges. Available at: http://aquaplant.tamu.edu/Emergent%20Plants/Sedges/Sedges.htm Accessed April 2004 Allen, D.B., B.J. Flatter, J. Nelson and C. Medrow. 1998. Redband Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss gairdneri Population and Stream Habitat Surveys in Northern Owyhee County and the Owyhee River and Its Tributaries. 1997. Idaho BLM Technical Bulletin No. 98-14. American Fisheries Society, Idaho Chapter (AFS). 2000. Fishes of Idaho. Available at < http://www.fisheries.org/idaho/fishes_of_idaho.htm>. Accessed November 2003. American Ornithologists’ Union (AOU). 1957. Check-list of North American Birds. 5th edition. American Ornithological Union, Washington, DC. Anderson, A. E., and O. C. Wallmo. 1984. Odocoileus hemionus. Mammalian Species 219:1– 9. Anderson, J. L., K. Bacon, and K. Denny. 2002. Salmon River Habitat Enhancement. Annual Report 2001. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, Fort Hall, ID. 14 pp. Anderson, M., P. Bourgeron, M. T. Bryer, R. Crawford, L. Engelking, D. Faber-Langendoen, M. Gallyoun, K. Goodin, D. H. Grossman, S. Landaal, K. Metzler, K. D. Patterson, M. Pyne, M. Reid, L. Sneddon, and A. S. Weakley. 1998. International Classification of Ecological Communities: Terrestrial Vegetation of the United States. Volume II. The National Vegetation Classification System: List of Types. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA. Arno, S. F. 1979. Forest Regions of Montana. Research Paper INT-218. U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. Arno, S.F. 1980. Forest Fire History in the Northern Rockies. Journal of Forestry 78:460–464. Aubry, K. B., Koehler, G. M., and J. R. Squires.
    [Show full text]
  • Nez Perce Tribe Nacó'x ̣(Chinook Salmon) and Héeyey (Steelhead
    Nez Perce Tribe Nacó’x ̣(Chinook salmon) and Héeyey (Steelhead) Adult Escapement and Spawning Ground Survey 2010 Summary Report Prepared by: Adult Technical Team Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management Fisheries Research Division Lapwai, ID 83540 May 2011 Nez Perce Tribe Nacó’x ̣(Chinook salmon) and Héeyey (steelhead) Adult Escapement and Spawning Ground Survey 2010 Summary Report Prepared by: Adult Technical Team Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management Fisheries Research Division Lapwai, ID 83540 This document should be cited as follows: Adult Technical Team. 2011. Nez Perce Tribe Nacó’x ̣(Chinook salmon) and Héeyey (steelhead) adult escapement and spawning ground survey 2010 summary report. Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management, Fisheries Research Division. Lapwai, ID INTRODUCTION This document summarizes adult spring, summer, and fall Nacó’x ̣(Chinook salmon) and Héeyey (steelhead) population estimates and spawning ground survey information collected on streams surveyed by the Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management (DFRM) during 2010. The purpose of this document is to provide resource assessment information to co-managers on a timely basis. Data collection is conducted under multiple contracts with specific project objectives and study designs. Methods have been standardized to assure accurate characterization of basic performance measures (Beasley et al. 2008). The reader is directed to project specific annual reports for a detailed description of methods used for calculation of performance measures. Adult spring and summer Nacó’x ̣(Chinook salmon) escapement estimates are presented from six streams where adult monitoring sites are located. Age 3 to 5 adult Chinook salmon are considered adults for this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the South Fork Salmon River Steelhead Trout Fishery
    U.S. FISH&WILDLIFE SERVICE Completion Report Evaluation of the South Fork Salmon River Steelhead Trout Fishery Restoration Program Performed for US Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service Lower Snake River Fish and Wildlife Compensation Plan Contract No. 14-16-0001-86505 Period Covered: March 1, 1984 to February 28, 1986 Russ Thurow Senior Fishery Research Biologist May 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT.....................................................1 INTRODUCTION ................................................2 DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA ...................................3 OBJECTIVES .................................................. 3 RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................6 METHODS .....................................................7 Adult Steelhead Movements ...............................7 Spawning Area Surveys ..................................7 Fry Emergence Studies .................................. 7 Rearing Densities of Fish ..............................8 South Fork and East Fork South Fork Salmon River..... 8 Tributaries ......................................... 9 Age and Growth .........................................9 Creel Census .......................................... 10 Genetic Analysis .................................... 11 RESULTS .................................................... 12 Fisheries Resources ................................... 12 Steelhead Life History and Movements ................... 12 Steelhead Spawning Characteristics ..................... 16 South Fork
    [Show full text]
  • Salmon River Management Plan, Idaho
    Bitterroot, Boise, Nez Perce, Payette, and Salmon-Challis National Forests Record of Decision Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Frank Church – River of No Return Wilderness Revised Wilderness Management Plan and Amendments for Land and Resource Management Plans Bitterroot, Boise, Nez Perce, Payette, and Salmon-Challis NFs Located In: Custer, Idaho, Lemhi, and Valley Counties, Idaho Responsible Agency: USDA - Forest Service Responsible David T. Bull, Forest Supervisor, Bitterroot NF Officials: Bruce E. Bernhardt, Forest Supervisor, Nez Perce NF Mark J. Madrid, Forest Supervisor, Payette NF Lesley W. Thompson, Acting Forest Supervisor, Salmon- Challis NF The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital and family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Person with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. ROD--II Table of Contents PREFACE ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Res-Thurow1985 Evaluation of the South Fork Salmon River Steelhead
    STATE OF IDAHO Department of Fish and Game Jerry M. Conley, Director EVALUATION OF THE SOUTH FORK SALMON RIVER STEELHEAD FISHERY RESTORATION PROGRAM Period: September 1, 1984 to January 31, 1985 United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Contract 14-16-0001-84132 Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Office By Russ Thurow Senior Fisheries Research Biologist TABLE OF CONTENTS Paqe ABSTRACT ........................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................... 2 OBJECTIVES ...................................................... 3 METHODS ......................................................... 3 Adult Steelhead Movements ................................... 3 Spawning Area Surveys ....................................... 4 Rearing Densities of Fish .................................... 4 South Fork and East Fork South Fork Salmon River......... 5 Tributaries ............................................ 5 Creel Census ................................................ 5 Genetic Analysis ............................................ 6 RESULTS ......................................................... 6 Steelhead Life History and Movements ........................ 6 Steelhead Spawning Characteristics .......................... 7 South Fork Salmon River ................................. 7 Tributaries ............................................ 7 Fish Distribution and Abundance ............................. 9 South Fork Salmon River ................................. 9 Tributaries
    [Show full text]
  • Rearing of Chinook Salmon in Tributaries of the South Fork Salmon River, Idaho
    REARING OF CHINOOK SALMON IN TRIBUTARIES OF THE SOUTH FORK SALMON RIVER, IDAHO William S. Platts Fred E. Partridge USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-205 INTERMOUNTAIN FOREST AND RANGE EXPERIMENT STATION FOREST SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE THE AUTHORS WILLIAM S. PLATTS is a Research Fishery Biologist for the Intermountain Station at Boise, Idaho. He received his B. S. (Conservation-Education) degree in 1955 from Idaho State University, and his M. S. (Fisheries) degree in 1957 and Ph. D. (Fisheries) degree in 1972 from Utah State Uni- versity. From 1957 through 1966 he worked as a Regional Fishery Biologist and Supervisor, Enforcement, with the Idaho Fish and Game Department. From 1966 through 1976 he was the Idaho Zone Fishery Biologist for the Intermoun- tain Region and consulted with the SEAM program. FRED E. PARTRIDGE is a Biological-Technician for the Inter- mountain Station at Boise, Idaho. He received his B. S. (Fisheries) degree in 1975 from Humboldt State University, and is presently completing requirements for an M. S. in Fisheries there. From 1969 to 1975 he worked as a Biological-Aid for the California Fish and Game Depart- ment and in 1976 worked as a Biological-Aid on stream surveys for the Montana Fish and Game Department. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT-205 May 1978 REARING OF CHINOOK SALMON IN TRIBUTARIES OF THE SOUTH FORK SALMON RIVER, IDAHO William S. Platts and Fred E. Partridge INTERMOUNTAIN FOREST AND RANGE EXPERIMENT STATION Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Ogden, Utah 84401 RESEARCH SUMMARY Fish populations in 23 tributaries of the South Fork Salmon River were sampled in 1971, 1972, and 1974.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild and Scenic Rivers Suitability Study Report and Legislative
    Appendix J Wild and Scenic Rivers Suitability Report Wild and Scenic Rivers Suitability Study Report and Legislative Environmental Impact Statement for the Secesh River, South Fork Salmon River, Monumental Creek, Big Creek, and French Creek Payette and Boise National Forests Idaho J - 1 Appendix J Wild and Scenic Rivers Suitability Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary......................................................................................................................................J-4 Development of Alternatives ...................................................................................................J-4 Summary of Effects .................................................................................................................J-6 Chapter I. Purpose and Need....................................................................................................J-8 Introduction..............................................................................................................................J-8 Background Information..........................................................................................................J-8 Purpose and Need, and the Proposed Action...........................................................................J-9 Scope of the Proposed Action and Decision to be Made.......................................................J-10 Issues and Alternatives...........................................................................................................J-10 Chapter II. Description
    [Show full text]
  • Idaho Fishing 2019–2021 Seasons & Rules
    Idaho Fishing 2019–2021 Seasons & Rules 1st Edition 2019 Free Fishing Day June 8, 2019 • June 13, 2020 • June 12, 2021 idfg.idaho.gov Craig Mountain Preserving and Sustaining Idaho’s Wildlife Heritage For over 25 years, we’ve worked to preserve and sustain Idaho’s wildlife heritage. Help us to leave a legacy for future generations, give a gift today! • Habitat Restoration • Wildlife Conservation • Public Access and Education For more information visit IFWF.org or call (208) 334-2648 YOU CAN HELP PREVENT THE SPREAD OF NOXIOUS WEEDS IN IDAHO! 1. Cleaning boats, trailers and watercraft after leaving a water body 2. Pumping the bilge of your boat before entering a water body 3. Cleaning boating and fishing gear from any plant material 4. Reporting infestations to your County Weed Superintendent CALL 1-844-WEEDSNO WWW.IDAHOWEEDAWARENESS.COM DIRECTOR MOORE’S OPEN LETTER TO THE HUNTERS, ANGLERS AND TRAPPERS OF IDAHO y 6-year-old grandson caught his first steelhead last year. It was a wild fish and he had Mto release it. We had quite a discussion of why Grandpa got to keep the fish that I had caught earlier, but he had to release his. In spite of my explanation about wild fish vs. hatchery-raised fish, he was confused. Although ultimately, he understood this, when his dad caught a wild steelhead and he had to release it, as well. Both of my grandsons insisted on taking a picture of us with my fish. These moments in the field with our families and friends are the most precious of memories that I hope to continue to have for several decades as a mentor of anglers and hunters, demonstrating “how to harvest” and more importantly how to responsibly interact with wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • South Fork Salmon River Subbasin Assessment
    South Fork Salmon River Subbasin Assessment May 29, 2002 This Page Left Intentionally Blank South Fork Salmon River Subbasin Assessment May 29, 2002 Prepared by: Boise Regional Office Idaho Department of Environmental Quality 1445 North Orchard Boise Idaho 83706 This Page Left Intentionally Blank South Fork Salmon River Subbasin Assessment February 2002 Table of Contents Table of Contents.................................................................................................................. i List of Tables........................................................................................................................ iii List of Figures.......................................................................................................................v List of Appendices..............................................................................................................vi Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Symbols .....................................................................vii Executive Summary............................................................................................................ix Subbasin at a Glance..................................................................................................xi Key Findings................................................................................................................xii 1. Subbasin Assessment – Watershed Characterization.........................................1 1.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]