DOCSLIB.ORG

Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 110 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 153 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, MARCH 26, 2007 No. 52 House of Representatives The House met at 12:30 p.m. and was war. They don’t want that kind of ac- Scooter Libby. In fact, he personally, called to order by the Speaker pro tem- countability, because it failed our unprecedented for a Vice President, pore (Ms. CASTOR). troops, from day one, on equipment kept visiting the CIA and saying, no, f and readiness. they didn’t have the intelligence right And then maybe it’s the other part, yet. I.e., they didn’t say what he want- DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO the part where we are going to demand ed. Niger yellow cake, Chalabi, all that TEMPORE accountability of the Iraqi Govern- stuff. He was so wrong. And then he The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- ment. Time and time again President said, ‘‘Simply stated, there’s no doubt fore the House the following commu- Bush sets benchmarks. ‘‘Those bench- that Saddam Hussein now has weapons nication from the Speaker: marks will be met.’’ They are never of mass destruction.’’ Vice President WASHINGTON, DC, met. There has to be a diplomatic and CHENEY in August of 2002 as he was March 26, 2007. political component. You cannot re- pushing us toward war. I hereby appoint the Honorable KATHY CAS- solve a civil war with military force in But then on the eve of the war, even TOR to act as Speaker pro tempore on this Iraq. But time and time again the Bush after their myths about weapons of day. administration has let the Iraqi Gov- mass destruction, the yellow cake, the NANCY PELOSI, ernment skate. This bill says they will aluminum tubes had started to fall Speaker of the House of Representatives. meet the President’s own chosen, apart, he said, ‘‘We believe that Sad- f President Bush and al Maliki’s, own dam has in fact reconstituted nuclear MORNING HOUR DEBATES chosen guidelines and benchmarks or weapons.’’ Vice President CHENEY. A we will begin to bring our troops home. man who has been so wrong and put The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- Plain and simple, not a war without our troops in harm’s way unneces- ant to the order of the House of Janu- end, not a war that will be settled by sarily, jeopardized the security of the ary 4, 2007, the Chair will now recog- future Presidents, as George Bush said United States by distracting us from nize Members from lists submitted by a year ago, but if this administration the real fight in Afghanistan, chal- the majority and minority leaders for and the Iraqi Government fail to do lenges this Congress on the Iraq Ac- morning hour debates. The Chair will what’s necessary for our troops, we are countability Act? No, I think last No- alternate recognition between the par- not going to strand them in the middle vember the American people started to ties, with each party limited to not to of a civil war. ask about accountability for him and exceed 30 minutes, and each Member, But the Vice President objects to his supposed boss, George Bush. except the majority leader, the minor- those things. He says if they really And then let’s look at their military ity leader, or the minority whip, lim- support the troops, then we should planning. General Shinseki, a good ited to not to exceed 5 minutes. take them at their word and expect man. They fired him. It was said we The Chair recognizes the gentleman them to meet the needs of our military didn’t need 350,000 people. Rummy said, from Oregon (Mr. DEFAZIO) for 5 min- on time, in full, no strings attached. ‘‘Oh, don’t worry. We can do it with utes. Let’s review the administration’s 100,000 or so.’’ Shinseki said, that f record on those issues. Let’s review would lead to strife, civil war and how the Bush-Cheney administration chaos. He was right. They fired him. THE VICE PRESIDENT AND THE met the needs of our troops. First of But presidential economic adviser IRAQ ACCOUNTABILITY ACT all, it was an unnecessary war. They Larry Lindsey said, ‘‘It’s going to be Mr. DEFAZIO. I thank the Chair. were pursuing a necessary war against very expensive. Very expensive.’’ No, Well, Vice President CHENEY was in al Qaeda, the Taliban, Osama bin CHENEY and his cohorts said, ‘‘No, form last weekend in Florida address- Laden. Remember them? Dead or alive? don’t worry. Iraq can pay for it them- ing a small group behind closed doors. Dead or alive? They abandoned that selves.’’ Well, we are now at $2 billion He attacked the House of Representa- war for an unnecessary war launched a week, hundreds of billions of dollars tives for passing the Iraq Account- under false pretenses in Iraq. on this war. So wrong. ability Act. I am not certain whether it Now, something called the Office of And then our troops, how did they is because he objects to the fact that Special Plans phonied up the intel- serve them? Vice President CHENEY we are going to make this administra- ligence. DICK CHENEY put together the again, ‘‘We believe we will, in fact, be tion review the readiness of our troops, Office of Special Plans with some of his greeted as liberators. I think it will go their equipment, before they’re rushed own hand-picked people, I think one of relatively quick. Weeks rather than to Iraq in an attempt to escalate the whom is now on the way to jail, in fact, months.’’ So they didn’t give our men b This symbol represents the time of day during the House proceedings, e.g., b 1407 is 2:07 p.m. Matter set in this typeface indicates words inserted or appended, rather than spoken, by a Member of the House on the floor. H3019 . VerDate Aug 31 2005 03:53 Mar 27, 2007 Jkt 059060 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 7634 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A26MR7.000 H26MRPT1 mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with HOUSE H3020 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE March 26, 2007 and women body armor, didn’t have ar- I ask my colleagues today to rise and DEMOCRATS CONTINUE TO TAX mored Humvees, they didn’t have the join me in paying tribute to Barton AND SPEND equipment they needed. Congress had College’s basketball team of 2007 and to to uncover those scandals after we recognize their extraordinary cham- (Mr. WILSON of South Carolina heard from the troops in the field. We pionship. asked and was given permission to ad- dress the House for 1 minute and to re- had to provide it over the objections of f this administration, and this guy has vise and extend his remarks.) the gall to say we aren’t serving the RECESS Mr. WILSON of South Carolina. Mr. troops as they want to keep our troops The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- Speaker, Democrats are as predictable mired down forever in the middle of a ant to clause 12(a) of rule I, the Chair as the sun: it continues to rise in the civil war? declares the House in recess until 2 east, and they continue to tax and This is extraordinary. And, most re- p.m. today. spend. cently, Vice President CHENEY last Accordingly (at 12 o’clock and 39 The Democratic budget released last year, no, 2 years ago, ‘‘I think they’re minutes p.m.), the House stood in re- week proposes the largest tax increase in the last throes, if you will, of the in- cess until 2 p.m. in American history: $392.5 billion. Not surgency.’’ I guess he still believes f only does it allow for the expiration of that. the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, but it does These people have done an extraor- b 1400 nothing to control unsustainable enti- dinary disservice to our troops, our tlement spending. country, our national security and the AFTER RECESS fight against true terrorism that at- The recess having expired, the House Republicans believe fiscal restraint tacked us on 9/11. We will not be dis- was called to order by the Speaker pro and pro-growth economic policies will tracted or bullied anymore. The Iraq tempore (Mr. SALAZAR) at 2 p.m. lead to budget surpluses and new jobs. Democrats believe out-of-control gov- Accountability Act is a strong response f to their mismanagement and it offers ernment spending should be subsidized the United States a way to bring this PRAYER with the hard-earned money of Amer- war to a successful conclusion and The Chaplain, the Reverend Daniel P. ican taxpayers. soon. Coughlin, offered the following prayer: Unfortunately, the Democratic budg- Bring the troops home. ‘‘Go down, Moses, et continues to squeeze taxpayers’ f Way down in Egypt land. pocketbooks without tightening the CONGRATULATING BARTON Tell ole Pharaoh, belt of Big Government. Such reckless COLLEGE’S BASKETBALL TEAM Let my people go.’’ policies will chill our growing economy These lines from the old spiritual, by reducing job creation. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- Lord, gave human slavery voice and ant to the order of the House of Janu- In conclusion, God bless our troops, hope. Its rundown rhythm muffled the and we will never forget September 11. ary 4, 2007, the gentleman from North sound of the Underground Railroad Carolina (Mr.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SENATE—Tuesday, March 7, 2006
    March 7, 2006 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE 2723 SENATE—Tuesday, March 7, 2006 The Senate met at 9:45 a.m. and was We will be returning to the lobbying side our borders, burning the American called to order by the PRESIDENT pro reform bill today. We will begin consid- flag is intended to intimidate, not to tempore (Mr. STEVENS). ering amendments. Therefore, in addi- engage in constructive speech. tion to the LIHEAP bill, we will have I believe the amendment process is PRAYER votes in relation to the amendments to the appropriate remedy to the Court’s The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- the lobbying reform bill. 1989 decision. As Harvard law professor fered the following prayer. I also expect the Senate to recess Richard Parker explains: Let us pray. from 12:30 until 2:15 for the weekly The amendment process is essential to the Our Father in heaven, today we party luncheons. Constitution’s deepest foundation—the prin- praise You because Your loving kind- I say again to all colleagues who ciple of popular sovereignty affirmed in its ness endures forever. You have blessed want to finish the lobbying bill this first words, ‘‘We the people.’’ Making use of week that we certainly want to allow this process reaffirms and thus preserves this land with freedom and abundance. that foundation. Thank You for spacious skies and adequate time for Members to offer amber waves of grain. amendments. I urge Members to come Since I first came to the Senate in Teach us to be thankful even when forward early.
    [Show full text]
  • White House Compliance with Committee Subpoenas Hearings
    WHITE HOUSE COMPLIANCE WITH COMMITTEE SUBPOENAS HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVERSIGHT HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 6 AND 7, 1997 Serial No. 105–61 Printed for the use of the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 45–405 CC WASHINGTON : 1998 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Jan 31 2003 08:13 May 28, 2003 Jkt 085679 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 E:\HEARINGS\45405 45405 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVERSIGHT DAN BURTON, Indiana, Chairman BENJAMIN A. GILMAN, New York HENRY A. WAXMAN, California J. DENNIS HASTERT, Illinois TOM LANTOS, California CONSTANCE A. MORELLA, Maryland ROBERT E. WISE, JR., West Virginia CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut MAJOR R. OWENS, New York STEVEN SCHIFF, New Mexico EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York CHRISTOPHER COX, California PAUL E. KANJORSKI, Pennsylvania ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida GARY A. CONDIT, California JOHN M. MCHUGH, New York CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York STEPHEN HORN, California THOMAS M. BARRETT, Wisconsin JOHN L. MICA, Florida ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, Washington, THOMAS M. DAVIS, Virginia DC DAVID M. MCINTOSH, Indiana CHAKA FATTAH, Pennsylvania MARK E. SOUDER, Indiana ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland JOE SCARBOROUGH, Florida DENNIS J. KUCINICH, Ohio JOHN B. SHADEGG, Arizona ROD R. BLAGOJEVICH, Illinois STEVEN C. LATOURETTE, Ohio DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois MARSHALL ‘‘MARK’’ SANFORD, South JOHN F. TIERNEY, Massachusetts Carolina JIM TURNER, Texas JOHN E.
    [Show full text]
  • Depoliticizing the Interim Appointments of US Attorneys
    LIVE AND LEARN: DEPOLITICIZING THE INTERIM APPOINTMENTS OF U.S. ATTORNEYS t Laurie L. Levenson The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done.' I. INTRODUCTION U.S. Attorneys play a special role in our federal criminal justice system. As the representatives of the federal government, they have the responsibility of enforcing federal laws in their respective districts.2 3 Although U.S. Attorneys serve "at the pleasure of the President," the4 goal is to have a fair and impartial prosecutor administering the laws. The recent firing of eight U.S. Attorneys has called into question at- tempts to politicize the role of this vital Office. By attempting to give the Attorney General the power to make indefinite interim appointments, I Professor of Law, William M. Rains Fellow & Director, Center for Ethical Advocacy, Loyola Law School. Thank you to John McKay, a man of true integrity, for inviting me to participate in the Symposium at Seattle University School of Law. His courage, as well as that of his fellow U.S. Attorneys, Paul Carlton, David Iglesias, Bill Cummins III, and Carol Lam, should serve as an inspi- ration for others dedicated to public service. I also wish to extend my gratitude to the editors of the Seattle University Law Review and to my wonderful research assistants, Emil Petrossian, Lindsay Meurs, William Smyth, and Mary Gordon.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H5556
    H5556 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE May 22, 2007 section 546 in two critical respects. First, it ef- tigation, which they surmised may have led to Mr. CONYERS. Mr. Speaker, I yield fectively removed district court judges from the their forced resignations. back the balance of my time. interim appointment process and vested the Mr. Speaker, the USA PATRIOT Act Reau- The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. PAS- Attorney General with the sole power to ap- thorization provision on interim United States TOR). The question is on the motion of- point interim United States Attorneys. Second, Attorneys should be repealed for two reasons. fered by the gentleman from Michigan the Act eliminated the 120-day limit on the First, Members of Congress did not get an op- (Mr. CONYERS) that the House suspend term of an interim United States Attorney ap- portunity to vet or debate the provision that is the rules and pass the Senate bill, S. pointed by the Attorney General. As a result, current law. Rather, the Republican leadership 214. judicial input in the interim appointment proc- of the 109th Congress slipped the provision The question was taken. ess was eliminated. Even more problematic, it into the Conference Report at the request of The SPEAKER pro tempore. In the created a possible loophole that permit United the Department of Justice. Not even Senate opinion of the Chair, two-thirds being States Attorneys appointed on an interim basis Judiciary Chairman ARLEN SPECTER, whose in the affirmative, the ayes have it. to serve indefinitely without ever being sub- chief of staff was responsible for inserting the Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Control of Federal Prosecutions: Looking Back and Looking Forward
    Columbia Law School Scholarship Archive Faculty Scholarship Faculty Publications 2009 Political Control of Federal Prosecutions: Looking Back and Looking Forward Daniel C. Richman Columbia Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Administrative Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, and the President/Executive Department Commons Recommended Citation Daniel C. Richman, Political Control of Federal Prosecutions: Looking Back and Looking Forward, 58 DUKE L. J. 2087 (2009). Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2464 This Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Scholarship Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POLITICAL CONTROL OF FEDERAL PROSECUTIONS: LOOKING BACK AND LOOKING FORWARD DANIEL RICHMANt ABSTRACT This Essay explores the mechanisms of control over federal criminal enforcement that the administration and Congress used or failed to use during George W. Bush's presidency. It gives particular attention to Congress, not because legislators played a dominant role, but because they generally chose to play such a subordinate role. My fear is that the media focus on management inadequacies or abuses within the Justice Department during the Bush administrationmight lead policymakers and observers to overlook the
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Attorneys Scandal and the Allocation of Prosecutorial Power
    "The U.S. Attorneys Scandal" and the Allocation of Prosecutorial Power BRUCE A. GREEN* & FRED C. ZACHARIAS** I. INTRODUCTION In 1940, Attorney General (and future Supreme Court Justice) Robert H. Jackson spoke to United States Attorneys about their duty not only to be "diligent, strict, and vigorous in law enforcement" but also "to be just" and to "protect the spirit as well as the letter of our civil liberties."' His talk was dedicated mostly to the relationship between the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the U.S. Attorneys in their shared pursuit of justice. On one hand, he observed that "some measure of centralized control is necessary" to ensure consistent interpretations and applications of the law, to prevent the pursuit of "different conceptions of policy," to promote performance standards, and to provide specialized assistance.2 On the other hand, he acknowledged that a U.S. Attorney should rarely "be superseded in handling of litigation" and that it would be "an unusual case in which his judgment 3 should be overruled." Critics of George W. Bush's administration have charged that the balance in federal law enforcement has tipped in the direction of too little prosecutorial independence and too much centralized control. 4 One of their prime examples is the discharge of eight U.S. Attorneys in late 2006,5 which * Louis Stein Professor of Law and Director, Louis Stein Center for Law and Ethics, Fordham University School of Law. The authors thank Michel Devitt, Graham Strong, and Sharon Soroko for commenting on earlier drafts and Brian Gibson, David Sweet, and Kimber Williams for their invaluable research assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • 1- United States District Court for The
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 08-0409 (JDB) HARRIET MIERS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This dispute pits the political branches of the federal government against one another in a case all agree presents issues of extraordinary constitutional significance. The heart of the controversy is whether senior presidential aides are absolutely immune from compelled congressional process. But as is often true of lawsuits that raise important separation of powers concerns, there are many obstacles to the invocation of the jurisdiction of the federal courts that must first be addressed. The Committee on the Judiciary (“Committee”), acting on behalf of the entire House of Representatives, asks the Court to declare that former White House Counsel Harriet Miers must comply with a subpoena and appear before the Committee to testify regarding an investigation into the forced resignation of nine United States Attorneys in late 2006, and that current White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten must produce a privilege log in response to a congressional -1- subpoena. Ms. Miers and Mr. Bolten (collectively “the Executive”)1 have moved to dismiss this action in its entirety on the grounds that the Committee lacks standing and a proper cause of action, that disputes of this kind are non-justiciable, and that the Court should exercise its discretion to decline jurisdiction. On the merits, the Executive argues that sound principles of separation of powers and presidential autonomy dictate that the President’s closest advisors must be absolutely immune from compelled testimony before Congress, and that the Committee has no authority to demand a privilege log from the White House.
    [Show full text]
  • SENATE—Monday, June 11, 2007
    15198 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE, Vol. 153, Pt. 11 June 11, 2007 SENATE—Monday, June 11, 2007 The Senate met at 2 p.m. and was SCHEDULE publicans, which is something he has called to order by the Honorable KENT Mr. REID. Mr. President, today the to make sure his Republicans under- CONRAD, a Senator from the State of Senate will be in a period of morning stand. North Dakota. business until 3:30 p.m., with the time I see in today’s Roll Call newspaper equally divided and controlled between that one Republican Senator said: I PRAYER the two leaders or their designees. At think the Democrats are going to have The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- 3:30 p.m., the Senate will have 2 hours to take care of most of those votes, the fered the following prayer: of debate as follows: An hour on the newspaper article says. Without men- Let us pray. motion to proceed to the energy legis- tioning the Senator’s name, the article O God, our Father, speak to us today lation, and the second hour will be de- states: that here in Your presence we may find bate on the motion to proceed to the Put the onus on Democrats to make up the knowledge of what You want us to do. legislation expressing no confidence in 15-vote deficit on cloture, saying Repub- Guide our Senators this week so that licans have nearly maxed out support on Attorney General Gonzales. Starting at their side. they clearly understand Your desires 5:30 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation Into the Removal of Nine U.S
    U.S. Department of Justice An Investigation into the Removal of Nine U.S. Attorneys in 2006 U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General Office of Professional Responsibility September 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION ................................................................ 1 I. Methodology of the Investigation ....................................................... 2 II. Organization of this Report ............................................................... 4 CHAPTER TWO BACKGROUND.................................................................. 7 I. U.S. Attorneys .................................................................................. 7 II. Selection of U.S. Attorneys................................................................ 8 III. Department Evaluation and Interaction with U.S. Attorneys ............. 9 IV. Backgrounds of Department Officials.............................................. 10 A. Alberto Gonzales ................................................................... 11 B. Kyle Sampson ....................................................................... 11 C. Monica Goodling ................................................................... 11 D. Paul McNulty ........................................................................ 12 E. Michael Elston ...................................................................... 12 F. David Margolis ...................................................................... 13 G. William Mercer .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of Justice
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MAY 10, 2007 Serial No. 110–58 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://judiciary.house.gov VerDate 0ct 09 2002 12:30 Jan 30, 2008 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 6011 H:\WORK\FULL\051007\35245.000 HJUD1 PsN: 35245 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE VerDate 0ct 09 2002 12:30 Jan 30, 2008 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 H:\WORK\FULL\051007\35245.000 HJUD1 PsN: 35245 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MAY 10, 2007 Serial No. 110–58 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://judiciary.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 35–245 PDF WASHINGTON : 2008 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 12:30 Jan 30, 2008 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 H:\WORK\FULL\051007\35245.000 HJUD1 PsN: 35245 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan, Chairman HOWARD L. BERMAN, California LAMAR SMITH, Texas RICK BOUCHER, Virginia F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., JERROLD NADLER, New York Wisconsin ROBERT C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Most Dangerous Power of the Prosecutor
    Pace Law Review Volume 29 Issue 1 Fall 2008 Article 1 September 2008 The Most Dangerous Power of the Prosecutor Bennett L. Gershman Pace University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr Part of the Criminal Procedure Commons Recommended Citation Bennett L. Gershman, The Most Dangerous Power of the Prosecutor, 29 Pace L. Rev. 1 (2008) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr/vol29/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. \\server05\productn\P\PLR\29-1\PLR101.txt unknown Seq: 1 27-FEB-09 14:04 PACE LAW REVIEW Volume 29 Fall 2008 Number 1 The James D. Hopkins Memorial Lecture Pace Law School, October 25, 2008 The Most Dangerous Power of the Prosecutor Bennett L. Gershman* I. Introduction A. Judge James D. Hopkins This is the James D. Hopkins Memorial Lecture in honor of Judge Hopkins, who was the Dean of Pace Law School from 1982 to 1983 and earlier served with great distinction on the New York Appellate Division’s Second Judicial Department. Judge Hopkins served on that court when I worked in the spe- cial prosecutor’s office, and as head of the appeals bureau, I ar- gued several cases in Judge Hopkins’ court. One case stands out, the case of Salvatore Nigrone v. Murtagh.1 It was an exten- sive undercover investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Impeachment Inquiry: William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States Presentation on Behalf of the President
    IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY: WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES PRESENTATION ON BEHALF OF THE PRESIDENT HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY PURSUANT TO H. RES. 581: PRESENTATION ON BEHALF OF THE PRESIDENT DECEMBER 8 AND 9, 1998 Serial No. 68 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 52±320 WASHINGTON : 1998 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office, Washington, DC 20402 1 VerDate 21-DEC-98 10:55 Jan 12, 1999 Jkt 053320 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 E:\RENEE\53320P2.000 53320p PsN: 53320p COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois, Chairman F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan Wisconsin BARNEY FRANK, Massachusetts BILL McCOLLUM, Florida CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York GEORGE W. GEKAS, Pennsylvania HOWARD L. BERMAN, California HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina RICK BOUCHER, Virginia LAMAR SMITH, Texas JERROLD NADLER, New York ELTON GALLEGLY, California ROBERT C. SCOTT, Virginia CHARLES T. CANADY, Florida MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina BOB INGLIS, South Carolina ZOE LOFGREN, California BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas STEPHEN E. BUYER, Indiana MAXINE WATERS, California ED BRYANT, Tennessee MARTIN T. MEEHAN, Massachusetts STEVE CHABOT, Ohio WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts BOB BARR, Georgia ROBERT WEXLER, Florida WILLIAM L. JENKINS, Tennessee STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey ASA HUTCHINSON, Arkansas THOMAS BARRETT, Wisconsin EDWARD A. PEASE, Indiana CHRISTOPHER B. CANNON, Utah JAMES E. ROGAN, California LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina MARY BONO, California (II) VerDate 21-DEC-98 10:55 Jan 12, 1999 Jkt 053320 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 E:\RENEE\53320P2.000 53320p PsN: 53320p MAJORITY STAFF THOMAS E.
    [Show full text]