CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

May 6, 2014

WORKSHOP – 5:30 P.M. REGULAR SESSION ‐ 6:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION FOLLOWING ANDERSON CITY HALL 1887 Howard Street

PARTICIPATION BY PUBLIC IN MEETING

Please review the Agenda to determine if the subject you wish to discuss is scheduled for Council consideration. If it is on the Agenda, you will have an opportunity when that matter comes up for discussion to briefly address the Council.

If the subject is not on tonight’s Agenda, please complete an Agenda Request Form (on Clerk’s table) and present it to the City Council Clerk. You will have the opportunity to speak on the subject under Item 5.2. However, if the item is not on the Agenda, each speaker will be limited to one three (3) minute opportunity to speak, unless the City Council makes an exception due to special circumstances.

The Brown Act prohibits the Council from taking action on any item not placed on the printed Agenda in most cases.

Effective July 1, 2008, the Brown Act requires any non‐confidential documents or writings distributed to a majority of the City Council less than 72 hours before a regular meeting will be made available to members of the public at the same time they are distributed.

City Council meetings are televised and can be seen live on Cable Public Access Channel 181 (previously Channel 11) and on tape delay the following morning at 10:00 a.m.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Anderson will make available to members of the public any special assistance necessary to participate in this meeting. The public should contact the City Clerk’s office (378‐6646) to make such a request. Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

This is an Equal Opportunity Program. Discrimination is prohibited by Federal Law. Complaints of discrimination may be filed with the Secretary of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. 20250.

City Council Meeting May 6, 2014 Page 2

WORKSHOP – 5:30 P.M.

W.S.1 WORKSHOP ‐ TO DISCUSS PROPOSED AMENDMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE ANDERSON MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING VARIOUS HEALTH AND SAFETY VIOLATIONS AND ADDING A PROCESS TO PERMIT AND REGULATE SPECIAL EVENTS

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Conduct a Workshop and have City Manager Jeff Kiser, Police Chief Michael Johnson, and City Attorney Ann Siprelle review the proposed Ordinance and answer questions from the Council regarding Social Host and Open containers, and various other sections of the ordinance; and provide direction to staff.

REGULAR SESSION – 6:00 P.M.

Notice: Charter Cable has notified the City that the Public Access Channel which airs our City Council meetings is being moved from Channel 11 to Channel 181 effective on or about May 6, 2014. Those residents wishing to view the meeting live or on the next day should note this change.

1.0 ROLL CALL – COUNCIL: Councilmember Day Councilmember Yarbrough Councilmember Hunt Vice‐Mayor Baugh Mayor Hopkins

2.0 INVOCATION – Pastor Nick Braito, Anderson‐Cottonwood Neighborhood Church, will give the invocation.

3.0 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE – Councilmember Day.

4.0 PRESENTATION

Cindy Delanty, Library Systems and Services, will present the Shasta Public Libraries Annual Report for 2013.

4.1 PROCLAMATIONS

4.1a National Police Week and Officer Memorial Day.

4.1b Veterans Appreciation Month.

City Council Meeting May 6, 2014 Page 3

5.1 SCHEDULED CITIZEN REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL – Persons who have, by the deadline set for the agenda, requested to address the Council shall be limited to one 5‐minute opportunity to speak.

Mr. Amarjit Singh, The Sikh Centre, will give a presentation on the 7th Annual Vaisakhi Festival & Day for non‐violence scheduled for Saturday, May 10th, 2014.

5.2 PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA ‐ Anyone in the audience who wishes to address the Council on a subject which is not on tonight’s agenda is now invited to come to the podium. Please provide your name and the subject you wish to discuss. Please limit your remarks to 3 minutes or less.

5.3 STUDENT REPORTS – None.

CONSENT AGENDA

6.0 CONSENT AGENDA ‐ Consent Agenda items are expected to be routine and non‐ controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any member of the public, staff or City Council may request that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda for separate discussion. Are there any requests to remove any items from the Consent Agenda?

6.1 MINUTES ‐ Approve the minutes of the regular meeting of April 15, 2014.

6.2 WARRANTS – Receive and file warrant 130162 to 130218 in the amount of $247,809.33; warrant 130219 to 130285 in the amount of $218,779.35; warrant 130286 to 130340 in the amount of $29,434.36; and an ACH in the amount of $1,190.13.

6.3 CITY ATTORNEY – None.

6.4 CITY CLERK ‐ Waive reading, except by title, of any ordinances under consideration at this meeting for either introduction or passage per Government Code Section 36934.

6.5 CITY MANAGER – None.

6.6 ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/FINANCE DIRECTOR/TREASURER – Receive and file the Quarterly Treasurer’s Report for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2014.

6.7 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT – None.

6.8 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT – None.

6.9 POLICE DEPARTMENT – None.

City Council Meeting May 6, 2014 Page 4

6.10 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT – None.

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR

6.11 ITEMS (IF ANY) REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR – Items removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion will be treated as Regular Agenda items and any member of the public may request to address the Council on any such item as it comes up for discussion. Please provide your name and limit your remarks to 3 minutes or less.

PUBLIC HEARINGS

Any person may speak on items scheduled for hearing at the time the Mayor declares the hearing open. ALL LEGAL NOTICES WERE GIVEN ACCORDING TO LAW.

7.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS

PUBLIC HEARING ‐ THE CITY OF ANDERSON ANNUAL HOUSING PRODUCTION REPORT

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. Conduct a Public Hearing, and

2. Receive the Annual Housing Production Report.

7.1 PUBLIC HEARING ‐ AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF ANDERSON ZONING ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 17.03 REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS CONSISTENT WITH THE ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. Conduct a public hearing regarding the Zoning Ordinance Revisions;

2. Introduce an Ordinance (First Reading), adding Chapter 17.03 to the Anderson Municipal Code, and set it for enactment on May 20, 2014 (Second Reading); and

3. Direct the City Clerk to read the ordinance by title only.

City Council Meeting May 6, 2014 Page 5

REGULAR AGENDA

8.0 REGULAR AGENDA – Regular Agenda Items will be discussed individually and in order. Any member of the public may request to address the Council on an item as it comes up for discussion. Please provide your name and limit your remarks to 3 minutes or less.

8.1 CITY COUNCIL – None.

8.2 CITY ATTORNEY – None.

8.3 CITY MANAGER – None.

VINEYARDS WATER REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT – REQUEST TO MODIFY THE REPAYMENT FORMULA

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. Consider the following alternatives and give direction to staff:

A. Modifying the number of lots to include all of the existing finished lots and decreasing the fee to $3,000 per lot.

B. Removing the annual 5% compounded fee increase, or modify the percentage of increase to coincide with the common index.

2. Make no changes to the existing agreement.

8.4 CITY CLERK

APPROVE A SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH THE CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL OF SHASTA COUNTY/ANDERSON PARTNERSHIP FOR HEALTHY CHILDREN FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE ANDERSON TEEN CENTER UNDER GRANT NO. 13‐CDBG‐8966

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Adopt a resolution approving a Subrecipient Agreement with the Child Abuse Prevention Council of Shasta County/Anderson Partnership for Health Children for administering the Youth Services – Anderson Teen Center portion of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) No. 13‐CDBG‐8966 and authorizing the City Manager to sign the agreement and any amendments thereto.

8.5 ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/FINANCE DEPARTMENT ‐ None.

8.6 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT – None. City Council Meeting May 6, 2014 Page 6

8.7 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT – None.

8.7a APPROVE A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE ANDERSON RIVER PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE AND AMEND PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 110 BUDGET LINE ITEM FOR THE MASTER PLAN UPDATE

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. Approve a professional services agreement with Foothill Associates of Rocklin, California in an amount of $49,900 to update the Anderson River Park Master Plan and authorize the City Manager to sign the agreement and any amendments thereto; and

2. Adopt a resolution authorizing the Finance Director to amend the 2013/2014 budget.

8.7b DISCUSS DATA COLLECTED DURING THE COMMUNITY VISIONING PROCESS AND REVIEW THE PROPOSED MISSION STATEMENT AND VALUE STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Discuss information provided from the data collected during the Community Visioning Process and review the draft Mission Statement and Value Statements.

8.8 POLICE DEPARTMENT

ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT 2013 YEAR‐END REPORT: ANNUAL REPORT OF CRIME STATISTICS FOR 2013

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Accept and file the Annual Report of Crime Statistics for 2013.

8.9 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

APPROVAL OF THE PARCEL MAP 14‐02 FOR SKYVIEW PLAZA.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

Adopt a Resolution Approving the Final Parcel Map PM14‐02 for Skyview Plaza and accepting the dedication of offered five foot (5’) wide public service easement based on Planning Commission Resolution 14‐02 approval of the Tentative Parcel Map.

City Council Meeting May 6, 2014 Page 7

10.0 SUCCESSOR AGENCY – (The City Council will, as the Successor Agency, conduct business related to the now dissolved Anderson Redevelopment Agency.) – None.

11.0 STAFF REPORTS – None.

12.0 COUNCIL REPORTS/COMMENTS – City Councilmembers will report on attendance at conferences/meetings reimbursed at City expense (Requirement of Assembly Bill 1234.)

CLOSED SESSION

Public Comment on Closed Session Item(s): Anyone in the audience who wants to address the City Council on a subject which is listed under the Closed Session agenda is now invited to come to the podium. Please provide your name and the subject you wish to discuss. Please limit your remarks to 5 minutes or less.

The City Council will convene to Closed Session.

C.S.1 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Pursuant to Govt. Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)) Significant exposure to litigation. Potential Cases: Two

C.S.2 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION – Continued from 4/01/2014 (Pursuant to Gov’t. Code Section 54957) Title: City Manager (Regular annual evaluation)

The City Council will reconvene to Open Session.

13.0 CLOSED SESSION ANNOUNCEMENT: The Mayor will announce the results of the Closed Session.

14.0 ADJOURN ‐ The City Council will adjourn to May 20, 2014. AGENDA ITEM

May 6, 2014 City Council Meeting

To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City CounG·

Through: Jeff Kiser, City Manager

From: Michael L. Johnson, Chief of Police

Date: May6, 2014 jsUBJECT

Workshop - To Discuss Proposed Amendments and Additions to the Anderson Municipal Code Establishing Various Health and Safety Violations and Adding a Process to Permit and Regulate Special Events

I RECOMMENDATION

The Chief of Police recommends:

Conduct a Workshop and have City Manager Jeff Kiser, Police Chief Michael Johnson, and City Attorney Ann Siprelle review the proposed Ordinance and answer questions from the Council regarding Social Host and Open containers, and various other sections of the ordinance.

IFISCAL IMP ACT

There will be no immediate fiscal impact associated with the adoption of the new and amended Anderson Municipal Code sections, however the bail/schedule fee for violations of the associated sections will soon be introduced to Council for consideration. Upon implementing the desired bail schedule fees the fiscal impact will likely result in a slight increase to general fund revenues.

ITEMWS.1 PAGE1 5/6/2014 IDISCUSSION and BACKGROUND

On April 1, 2014, the City Council introduced an ordinance to amend the Anderson Municipal Code for several Police related articles. The ordinance was set for a second reading at the meeting of April 15, 2014, at which time several questions from the City Council came up that had not previously been answered. The Council did not take action on this item but rather requested staff to conduct a workshop in order to answer the Council's questions and so that the Council could be better informed prior to making significant changes in local laws that will affect the citizens.

The reasons for implementing the proposed changes to the municipal code that were previously presented to the Council are repeated below for your reference:

'Jl steady rise in nuisance related calls for service, such as sleeping and camping in public, loud parties, underage drinking at private parties, panhandling, and loitering in parking lots, have prompted the police department to assess its resources and legal foundation to address these community issues. The blight incurred by some of these types of issues is negatively impacting our City. In response the Police Department is seeking proactive means to appropriately combat the negative impacts. The addition of specific Anderson Municipal Code sections gives the code enforcement officer, community service officers, and sworn officers additional tools to effectively achieve the cooperation of the violator.

In addition, the existing Municipal Code has no process for regulating large outdoor block parties, concerts, festivals, public assemblies and other public events that may require additional City staff time to provide security, assistance with set-up, clean-up, etc. The proposed ordinance amends Chapter 10.60 to establish a process for permitting and regulating such events.

The proposed Anderson Municipal Code sections and the amended sections language/definition additions are meant to be applied with tact and common sense. As recognized in federal and state law, the "spirit of the law" vs. the "letter of the law" are applicable means of enforcement dependent on the unique set of circumstances at hand. The Anderson Police Department and City of Anderson will continue to seek cooperation through communication, education, and partnerships where appropriate. The Anderson Municipal Code is used as a necessary tool to preserve order and support the community's and City Council's vision for the City.

Upon adoption of the sections and eventual implementation of the bail schedule fee the City of Anderson Police Officers and other authorized staff will have the ability to issue code enforcement citations and leverage financial penalties for violations of these ordinances."

Tonight I am recommending the CCmuncil conduct a workshop to allow the Police Chief, City Manager, and City Attorney to answer any questions they may have regarding the proposed change and give direction to staff as to how they should proceed in this matter.

IATTACHMENT

None. ITEMWS.t PAGE2 5/6/2014 On or before May 6, 2014, Charter will be moving the Educational and Government channels to a new location as follows:

Current New Channel Location Location

Government Access 8 180

PEG Access – City of Anderson 11 181

Educational Access 26 182

Annual Report for the Year 2013 2013 Shasta Public Libraries Year End Annual Report

The year 2013 was another successful year of library services to our communities. Use of the Shasta Public Libraries (Library) system was strong, with circulation of Library materials and other measures remaining high. The Library continued to serve as a popular community center, offering programs and services for all ages. The Library also provided assistance to those seeking employment through free computer classes and access to computers for job-search tasks such as completing online applications and updating resumes. In 2013, we saw further advancement into the Digital Age with the continuation of ZipBooks, Chromebooks and a rise in the use of eBooks in the collection. This year, the children’s department received a Library Services and Technology Act grant that provided funding for two state-of-the-art Teen Creation Stations. The stations will serve as technology hubs for creating visual art (still and motion), composing music, editing movies and any combination of these media. In addition, a grant from the McConnell Foundation funded three Advanced Workstations in Education computer stations for children. One station provides educational software that supports the Common Core State Standards for school age children. Two stations provide software with early learning skills necessary for children entering kindergarten. The library also expanded its variety of services offered to the public by introducing a piano and museum passes for checkout.

Although State funding for libraries has been significantly reduced, Library staff and the Shasta Library Foundation obtained grant funding to support programs at the Library. The Friends of the Shasta County Libraries and the Shasta Library Foundation remained significant fiscal supporters. The Friends of the Intermountain Libraries and the Friends of the Anderson Library also contributed needed funding.

Strategic Plan The Shasta Public Libraries Strategic Plan 2013-2016 (Plan) was developed in 2013 and provided guidance to Library management as to the allocation of time and resources. The process of Plan development included bringing in an outside consultant and the use of benchmarking by the City. Of the many library service options available to public libraries, the Plan emphasizes four areas prioritized by a community focus group, and outlines goals and objectives to advance these services. Areas of focus include:

1. Lifelong Learning: A library that provides Lifelong Learning service helps address the desire for self-directed personal growth and development opportunities. 2. Basic Literacy: A library that offers Basic Literacy service addresses the need to read and perform other essential daily tasks. 4. Best Seller and Hot Topics: A library that provides Best Sellers and Hot Topics service helps to fulfill community residents' appetite for information about popular cultural and social trends and their desire for satisfying recreational experiences. 5. Public Spaces: A library that provides Public Spaces helps address the needs of people to meet and interact with others in the community.

The following report outlines the successes of the last year as well as some projects that will continue during the upcoming year.

Shasta Public Libraries 2013 Year End Annual Report Page 1 Library Usage

2013 2012 2011 T otal Circulation: 600,764 610,452 564,819

Redding 544,173 553,812564,819 511,869 Anderson 5438,867 511,86937,579 493,95534,825 Burney 17,724 19,061 18,125

Total Registered Borrowers: 118,975 114,363 109,642 Redding 102,062 98,153 93,960

Anderson 13,251 12,658 12,225 Burney 3,662 3,552 3,457 T otal Internet S essions: 118,306 104,191 107,828

Redding 103,178 89,640 91,820 Anderson 13,016 12,175 12,828 Burney 2,112 2,376 4 3,180

Total Gate Count: 2,212,408 2,072,443 n/a Redding 2,164,653+ 2,018,738 n/a Anderson 2,018,73847,755 53,705 n/a

The 2013 circulation for the Library totaled 600,764. This amounts to a slight decrease of 2% from 2012. July 2013 had the highest circulation with 52,908 for the Redding Library and 58,236 for the system. The year began with 114,363 registered Library borrowers and ended with 118,975. This is a 4% increase. The Redding Library had 2,164,653 visitors using the library in 2013. The Anderson Library had 47,755 visitors coming through their doors.

Of note is the increase in the number of total internet sessions in all three locations. This may be a trend as more people use wireless with their own laptops and also the use of the Chromebooks available. County wide, internet sessions totaled 118,306—up from 104,191 last year with Redding Library having 103,178 this year and 89,640 in the previous year. Of the total internet sessions for 2013, 27,437 were wireless users.

The total number of programs offered at the Library was 694 with a total program attendance of 13,273. Ongoing adult programs included a book discussion group, family history assistance, computer classes, films, Veterans Resource Center, and an adult summer reading program. Special adult programs included author talks, lectures, music programs, and sign language classes. Ongoing youth programs included storytimes, each combined with crafts, puppet shows, or playtime components, Baby Sign Language classes, teen tech programs (including video games such as WII and Rock Band) and the annual summer reading program.

The Teen Advisory Board assisted with Library programs and developed several teen projects such as creating art with old and discarded computer parts and displaying them, planning a community forum held by the Shasta County Youth Prevention Council about cyber bullying and teens, and planning a meme contest. A meme is a concept that spreads from person to person via the Internet.

The library participated in two Big Read programs, featuring the titles Nancy Clancy: Super Sleuth and Four Corners of the Sky.

Sha sta Public Libraries 2013 Year End Annual Report Page 2

Special events for youth were also offered throughout the year highlighted by Happy Seuss Day to You, Little Movers & Shakers, Showcase of Storytelling, and the Day of Literacy and Play. One on-going family program was the knitting/crochet group entitled Yarns@the Library.

The Redding Library participated in the American Library Association grant Bridging Cultures Bookshelf: Muslim Journeys. The “bookshelf” consisted of 25 titles and three movies with the purpose of presenting to the American public new and diverse perspectives on the people, places, histories, beliefs, practices, and cultures of Muslims in the United States and around the world. In addition to this collection, two films were shown and a discussion was led by a speaker from the Islamic Center of Redding.

Shasta Literacy Program The goal of the Shasta Literacy Program is to provide one-on-one literacy tutoring. By December 31, 2013, there were 108 active learners. Of these 108 learners, 38 prepared to take their G.E.D exam. Tutoring is done exclusively by volunteers. In 2013, there were 89 volunteer tutors. Training for tutors is provided by the Adult Literacy Coordinator.

Literacy funding came from varied sources including a California Library Literacy Services grant in the amount of $18,924, a Califa (Califa is a library cooperative in California) reimbursement of $2,934, a United Way grant in the amount of $4,145, a US Bank grant in the amount of $10,000, a Rotary Club grant in the amount of $2,500, $1,000 was given by the Anderson Family Endowment, and a Scripps Howard (Redding Record Searchlight) grant in the amount of $4,000. Additionally, a portion of the money raised at the gala fund-raising event, Taste of Thailand event, sponsored by the Shasta Library Foundation, was given directly to Literacy for materials purchases. Thanks to donations from…..

In June of 2013, a very exciting partnership between the Shasta Adult Literacy Program and Shasta Community College went into effect with a one year contract. Shasta College provides the program with $20,040 yearly and the program enrolls eligible learners in a non-credited course through the college, providing a minimum of 90 instructional hours per week in each semester.

After-School Tutoring Program The Redding School District and the Library continued to partner to provide after-school tutoring services to at-risk students from Cypress and Juniper schools. This program is focused on improving student reading skills. The Redding School District provides a teacher who meets with the children two hours per day, four days per week. The program combines traditional tutoring with two computer programs: Read Naturally and Study Island. Redding School District also funds one half-time position in Literacy to support the work of the Literacy Coordinator with this project. Volunteer adult tutors read with the children twice each week. In 2013, 240 hours of literacy tutoring was provided through this program. The Redding Breakfast Lions Club donated $1,000 to the program to purchase dictionaries and school supplies.

Reference Service The Library continued to assist people referred to the Library by agencies such as Employment Development Department, the Department of Motor Vehicles, or their bank for forms and information that are only available online. People were referred to the Library to fill out online- only job applications. Many of these people had never used a computer before or had limited computer skills. Staff assisted many people using Craigslist or other such software for buying and selling items. Many individuals were referred to the Library to attend free computer

Sha sta Public Libraries 2013 Year End Annual Report Page 3 classes to improve job skills. Food industry employees and other local workers continue to be referred to the Library to take a Food Handler’s test required by state law. State and federal agencies have moved to online tax forms, and the Library is proving to be a key resource for accessing these forms for people who do not have computers. Staff received training on the Affordable Care Act and provided resources, but did not have as many requests for assistance on it as was originally anticipated.

The Reference Desk staff continued to provide research assistance to many students (children, teens, and adults) including those in educational programs at Shasta College, Simpson University, Chico State, National University, Institute of Technology, and those enrolled in distance education programs online. With continued funding cuts to local school libraries, many students came to the Library because they were unable to utilize their school library. Homeschooled K-12 students sought information about a variety of subjects. Library staff continued to assist students with research requiring the use of print materials. Although students may be savvy using computers, they often lack experience locating print resources. Younger students requested information on topics such as “going green,” bullying and social networking, horses, dogs, drawing, and computer animation. Topics of interest also included current events such as sink holes, and violence in schools.

The “life-long learning” questions asked at the reference desk covered a variety of topics such as health, legal issues, business, family history, retirement, crafts and hobbies, diet and exercise, cooking, travel, investing, pets, automotive repair, self-help, and job and career information.

The Parenting Collection remains a popular collection with adults asking for information on pregnancy, birth, baby names and how to teach a newborn to sleep through the night. Raising children with special needs is also a common query. Other popular information requests included autism, special diets, food allergies, and gluten-free diets.

Local history questions were received from both local residents and those who live out of the area. Many inquiries required the use of microfilm of the local newspaper the Record Searchlight which the Library owns dating 1852 to the present. Other questions involved using resources only available to the public at the Library--such as old city directories and phone books, local Native American information, the NewsBank database which contains the index to the Redding Record Searchlight (1991-current), and rare or out-of-print historical books on Shasta County. The locations of historical mines and gold panning are always popular topics.

Readers’ advisory is still a key library service as people of all ages asked for help in selecting books to read for enjoyment or for homework assignments. Tools available to the public to assist with readers’ advisory include the NoveList database and reading lists compiled by staff. Popular readers’ advisory services for children include finding read-alike titles “If you liked Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins or Maximum Ride by James Patterson, you’re going to love…”

As the EPA Repository Library for Region 9, the Library answered a variety of questions about the Iron Mountain Mine. Queries were submitted both by mine personnel and the community at large. Staff worked with the EPA to replace damaged and missing items from the collection. Because we are a federal government depository, the Library participated in the Biennial Survey of Depository Libraries. Data from this survey is used by the Federal Depository Library Program for analyzing government document services and access.

Sha sta Public Libraries 2013 Year End Annual Report Page 4 An inventory of all Library flood and FEMA resources was completed for the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) required by the City of Redding.

The Library continued to work closely with local agencies and organizations doing specialized research. Such agencies included the Shasta Historical Society, Shasta Genealogical Society, Behrens-Eaton House Museum, state and federal parks, SMART Business Resource Center, City of Redding, Shasta County, Shasta County Public Law Library, CalVets, Shasta County Veterans Services Office, and many others.

Homework Help Many students attend schools that have implemented the Accelerated Reading Program (AR). AR book labels were inserted into Juvenile and Young Adult chapter books, easy readers, and biographies. Staff continued labeling nonfiction books for both children and teens.

A popular Library online resource HelpNow! offered live tutoring to students in grades K-College with a 44% increase in searches for 2013. A writing lab offered students a place to submit writing assignments and receive comments within 24 hours. This resource also offered an online project center, a flash card study area, “cloud” backpack for information storage, and a virtual study group area. HelpNow! also incorporates an Adult Learning Center with resume writing assistance, G.E.D. and citizenship test preparation, and other adult education resources. Adult education students connected with live tutors for one-on- one help with basic skills building. A writing lab feature, similar to the one available to school aged students, allowed adults to get assistance with their writing skills.

NoveList K-8 is an easy-to-use electronic resource designed for elementary and middle school students. Users can search by title, author, or keyword to access titles that match the genre or subject in which they are interested. Useful features include Recommended Reads, Book Talks, annotations and Curricular Connections. Older readers can access NoveList Plus that includes titles appropriate to older students.

Collections In 2013, new items added to the Library totaled 18,882 as follows:

Redding Library 15,348 Anderson Branch 1,980 Burney Branch 1,554 18,882

Funded by Friends Of The Anderson Library, and Friends of the Intermountain Libraries, the Hot Off the Press collection, which provides multiple copies of New York Times bestsellers, remained a popular service. Many customers appreciated visiting their branch and finding bestsellers available on the “New Items Shelves.”

Areas of significant purchase in the adult nonfiction collection included replacement of damaged books and books containing out-of-date information. Currency of information is especially important in medicine, law, computers, and travel. Other areas of purchase included religion, history, language, sports, business, test books, diet and health, cookbooks, self-help, bestsellers, award-winning books, classics, hobbies, and parenting. Volunteers shifted the adult nonfiction collection to move books in specific areas off the bottom shelves and help spread out the collection for easier access.

Sha sta Public Libraries 2013 Year End Annual Report Page 5 In the adult fiction genre collections, emphasis was once again placed on filling series gaps, updating classics and prize-winning books, and replacing lost and damaged books. Additional focus was placed on updating the popular adult graphic novel collection. New popular genres included street/urban lit, erotic fiction such as Fifty Shades of Gray and Steampunk. Ongoing weeding was conducted in adult fiction. For newer, popular fiction, staff created bookmarks of lists of titles with annotated descriptions to promote the materials.

Disks for children’s DVDs are now stored behind the Children’s desk leaving empty cases on the shelves. Customers bring the cases to the desk for check-out. The new procedures are working well, and the public indicates they are happy having a larger collection to choose from.

In an effort to save costs, the library switched database vendors from Gale to Ebsco in July. Ebsco resources include a general magazine resource, children’s databases, and an automotive repair manual online.

Areas of significant purchase in the juvenile and young adult collections included the ordering of highly requested subject areas such as winter sports and the Olympic Games, mythology, cyber bullying, and saving animals after natural disasters.

Children’s new nonfiction books supporting the Common Core in school were purchased on state, local, and federal government, elections, political parties, and wars. Other books were purchased on internment camps, freedom marches, military services, and the use of dogs in the armed forces.

Teen nonfiction books were purchased to support use of the new Teen Creation Stations. Books included titles such as The Artist’s Guide to GIMP: Creative techniques for Photographers, Artists, and Designers, Photoshop Elements, Adobe Premiere, and others covering iClone Crazy Animation techniques, 3D printing, film editing, audio production and digitally-based careers.

Most requested teen fiction genres remained horror, books made into movies such as Perks of Being a Wallflower or Hunger Games, dystopian, supernatural romance, and Steampunk.

In 2013, 578 titles were added to the Library’s digital collection. Our current vendor for digital materials is OverDrive. New titles were added on a monthly basis, with eBooks and audiobooks being the most popular and requested items. Purchasing for the collection focused on adult bestsellers, teen fiction, and children’s fiction. The Library experimented with purchasing metered titles this year which can only circulate for a set number of times. These proved to be successful and well worth their price. OverDrive focused on improving access in the past year and many changes were implemented, allowing users to access digital titles in their web browser. Improved online help was also implemented. Customers used a variety of devices to access digital titles in various formats. Staff noticed an increase in the variety of devices used by customers this year. It is no longer primarily Kindles and Nooks being used. To help market OverDrive, the OverDrive bus visited the Redding Library on April 8 and 9.

Meeting Rooms Meeting Rooms were very popular in 2013, with 4,794 reservations and 44,947 estimated attendees. Community and government organizations often expressed their appreciation for these meeting spaces via “thank you” calls, letters, and email. The Redding Library Computer Center was used 330 times with an estimated 5,167 attendees. Popular uses for the Computer Center included adult computer classes, After-School Literacy Program instruction, and staff training. Also, AARP Tax Aide used the Community Meeting Rooms between February and

Sha sta Public Libraries 2013 Year End Annual Report Page 6 April, 2013 to provide tax preparation assistance to low-income residents and seniors.

Events/Programs The Library’s fifth Adult Summer Reading-- Groundbreaking Reads, proved to be popular with 165 participants reading 1,230 books. A variety of adult programs were offered including kayaking, hiking, knitting handbags from recycled plastic bags, rock hounding, jewelry, and film events. All branches participated in Adult Summer Reading, as well as the Adult Literacy Program.

In 2013, the Shasta Genealogical Society (Society) volunteers provided free, drop-in family history assistance three times a week at the Redding Library. The interest in online genealogical research continues to grow. The Society assisted 434 customers with family history research. Access to the library’s Ancestry Library Edition database was particularly popular.

Best of the West, an adult book discussion group, continued to meet at the Redding Library each month. The attendance for the year was 175 adults. This program was sponsored by FOSCL.

Two beginning adult sign language 6-week classes were offered at the Redding Library. A popular baby sign language class was also offered. These classes were taught by a volunteer.

Art House Movies, a program featuring independent and foreign films, was offered at the Redding Library once a month. Volunteers and 101 adults attended these films.

Authors Kimberly Carlson, Naomi Tickle, and Sheri Downs visited the library to talk about their books.

Special adult programs included duplicate bridge lessons (January), Dolls and African American History (February), and Legacy, Legend, and Lore of Woman’s History (March).

Money Smart Week was celebrated in April with a financial literacy class held for teens, sponsored by Girls Inc., and a financial literacy class for adults entitled, Take Control of Your Money. Financial literacy pamphlets published by the Federal Trade Commission were distributed to the public.

The Brave Faces Portrait Gallery was on display at the Redding Library all summer. Sponsored by the Shasta County Health and Human Services Agency, this art display uses beautifully rendered portraits and oral histories to tell the true stories of hope and recovery of Shasta County residents who have struggled with a mental illness or suffered a loss by suicide.

The Redding Library continued to participate in the Art in the City quarterly exhibit. Art in the City is a program sponsored by the City of Redding that is based in City Hall. Exhibits featured local photographers, painters, mixed media artists and sculptors. The Redding Library was also a “destination” on the Cultural Cruise, sponsored by Turtle Bay Exploration Park, First United Methodist Church, Shasta College, the City of Redding, Shasta State Historical Park and other venues around Redding.

Discover & Go was implemented in October with the help of a grant to the library. Discover & Go offers online access to free and discounted passes to numerous museums and cultural institutions. All you need is a library card to “checkout” the passes.

Sha sta Public Libraries 2013 Year End Annual Report Page 7 The Veterans Resource Center (VRC), established at the Redding Library in November 2012, continued to offer services and referral to local veterans. A total of 105 veterans visited the VRC. Funding for the VRC was provided via LSTA funding administered by the State Library. Volunteers come to the Library every Tuesday from 10 am-12 pm to staff the VRC. The volunteers interviewed veterans and endeavored to match their needs to the organizations best suited to help them. The Redding Library worked closely with the local Shasta County Veterans Service Office (CVSO). A cart of veteran’s resources was housed on the second floor by the Reference Desk. It contained pamphlets and books, including the 2013 California Veteran’s Resource Book produced by CalVets. Elizabeth Kelley, Adult Services Manager, presented a program at the California Library Association (CLA) fall conference about the VRC.

In November, 2013, the Library sponsored its fifth Food for Fines campaign, allowing customers with outstanding fines for overdue books to pay off their fines with donated food items. For each can of food donated, $1 in fines was forgiven up to $10 per borrower. The collected food was distributed to One Safe Place, Anderson Cottonwood Christian Assistance, and the Burney Food Co-op. Overall participants paid off a total of $514.45 in fines. Many people who did not have fines donated canned goods. For the Redding Library, 525 total cans were collected.

The Library’s teen and children’s summer reading programs (SRP) had themes of Beneath the Surface and Dig into Reading respectively. 1,255 young people aged 18 and under signed up to read through the summer. A variety of programs were offered at all three libraries for pre-K through 6th grade, with teen specific programs offered at the Redding Library. Programs continue to be funded by the Friends of the Shasta County Library (FOCSL), and The Redding Breakfast Lions Club donated $1,000 to the program for the purchasing of give-away books for children that completed the SRP. Presentations were offered by organizations such as Shasta Caverns and Shasta Dam. Summer Wee Read began on June 10. Parents read to their preschoolers and attend storytimes in order to earn a free book. The Record Searchlight partnered in this program by purchasing give-away books through the Scripps Foundation.

For the fifth year, dogs played a significant role at the Redding Library. In 2013, 348 children participated in the Reading Education Assistance Dogs program. The program dogs are registered therapy animals that come to the Library with their trainers and are read to by area children. The dogs are ideal reading companions because they listen attentively. Participating children eagerly anticipate their time with the dogs and have improved their reading skills and confidence.

A special storytime, The Showcase of Storytelling was held during the Week of the Young Child. The storytime was grant funded by Shasta First 5 and was held in partnership with Shasta Early Literacy Partnership and the Shasta County Office of Education. Two bedtime books were read by a pajama-clad librarian, a healthy snack was served, and a craft was available. There were 42 attending the event.

First 5 Shasta awarded the library a $10,000 grant for enhancements to the mini-preschool program, Li’l Movers & Shakers. This program offers an innovative pre-K experience for young children. It promotes healthy living through yoga, dance, healthy snacks, and a ready to learn curriculum. Total attendance at the programs was 1,644.

The library was offered the opportunity to participate in a statewide pilot project with Califa in which it received one Play & Learn Island. The Play & Learn Island Healthy Mind, Body & Earth

Sha sta Public Libraries 2013 Year End Annual Report Page 8 (valued at $15,000) has supported the early learning efforts of the library’s storytimes. The Island promotes play, literacy, health, math, and science in young children.

The library promoted reading through the 6th annual A Day of Literacy & Play event on October 26th. Each year the event is held on the last Saturday of October in honor of National Family Literacy Day. Twelve other organizations participated in the program. Activities included a library scavenger hunt presented by the Children’s Department, and a dangly spider craft sponsored by the Redding Library Teen Advisory Board, healthy pumpkin snacks provided by UC CalFresh Nutrition Education, a parenting workshop by Abba’s Child, a slithery snack project by North State Fatherhood Task Force, a pumpkin man craft by the YMCA, and making spooky scrap books by the Dyslexia Awareness Group. In addition, Turtle Bay Exploration Park did a creepy, crawly, critter presentation that included tarantulas, a scorpion, and a snake. Other activities included face painting, balloon creations, a book walk, and photo opportunities with KIXE’s Cookie Monster. KIXE donated grant-funded children’s books to the Library as part of the celebration. Books included classics such as Charlotte’s Web, and highly popular series books such as Rick Riordan’s Percy Jackson & the Olympians. Attendance at the event was approximately 405.

The Children’s Department offered a special holiday program, Crafty Christmas. The event featured crafts for all ages, refreshments, a visit from Santa Claus, and free books funded through a Shasta Library Foundation fund raising event, the Taste of Thailand. Donations for the craft program came from Eastside Road Self Storage, Rick and Pamela Hill, Lumberjack’s Restaurant, Dr. Leon & Donna Nelson, Lee and Judy Salter, Jack and Kristen Schreder, and Sally Wells.

As a part of the Crafty Christmas event, the Story Room was turned into a “relaxation room” containing sensory bins filled with things such as rice and pompoms. Holiday music played quietly in the background. The idea was to give children on the autistic spectrum a way to enjoy a holiday celebration. Many children on the spectrum can’t handle a regular crafts fair because there is too much stimulation. With this is mind, Santa also visited these children, though he sat and silently allowed children to approach if they were interested. Gift books were also available for children to pick and take home. One hundred and fifty people attended the Crafty Christmas events.

Redding Library helped set a new world record for shared reading by hosting a Read for the Record program in October. It was held in partnership with First 5 Shasta. Thirty-five attended the event. Children were treated to a puppet show and a craft after the story and also received a free book.

Two special Take 10 storytimes were held in partnership with the Shasta Early Literacy Partnership. Children received a free book at each event. In the March program Five Green and speckled Frogs was the featured book. The Library also read two other books and provided a craft. Children in attendance were each given a copy of the featured book.

In-N-Out Burgers Cover to Cover book club began in March. Children ages 4-12 read five books to earn a free hamburger certificate. We had 466 children participate.

The library hosted a special storytime in April for The Week of the Young Child. The storytime was entitled A Showcase of Storytelling. Partnerships for this also included Shasta Early Literacy Partnership, First 5 Shasta and the Shasta County Office of Education: Early

Sha sta Public Libraries 2013 Year End Annual Report Page 9 Childhood Services. The program modeled age-appropriate storytelling techniques for parents, included a healthy snack, and children took home a free book provided by First 5 Shasta.

Teen volunteers participated in many different activities including putting up a Valentine’s Day display in the Teen Scene area called Blind Date with a Book. Display books were covered in black paper. Each book had a clue attached. The idea was for each book to be checked out and read based on the interest in the clue.

Teen highlights included: guest speaker Mark Dadigan from Shasta County Public Health giving a presentation on a new teen blog he is working on for the Health Department, a visit from Shasta County Youth Violence Prevention Council’s Susan Wilson doing a presentation for teens on cyber bullying, and the Redding LibraryTeen Advisory Board’s new fad in Redding called “Book Facing.” Book facing is when a person holds a book with a face on the cover up as their face and takes a photo to post on a social media or share with friends.

Exhibits in the children’s department ranged from Grab Your Hat and Read with the Cat displays, in honor of Read Across America Day to Love your Teeth for Valentine’s Day and Youth and Family Services art done by Shasta County foster children.

Outreach opportunities for children’s services included: participation in the City of Redding’s Earth First Celebration, KinderCollege at Simpson University, Turtle Bay School’s Career Day, preschool visits, back-to-school events, Turtle Bay Exploration Park’s Week of the Young Child It’s a Big World event, Healthy Shasta Walk this Way event at Turtle Bay, and Mercy Hospital’s annual Teddy Bear Festival, held at St. Joseph’s school.

The Library also attended the College Quest event held at Simpson College where Shasta Union High School District, CollegeOPTIONS, Simpson University, National University, Shasta College, and the Shasta County Office of Education, all participated. College Quest is designed for high school students and their families to explore higher education opportunities. The Library shared a wealth of college resources with families in attendance.

In addition to these outreach events, the library has been active in the Reach Higher Shasta and Shasta Early Literacy Partnership meetings, and their activities in the community.

Automation Through a grant from the California State library, the Library purchased two Teen Creation Stations. These stations consist of two powerful computer systems designed for animation, photo manipulation, and sound creation and editing. Included with the systems are teen tablets, production quality headphones, and the Microsoft Kinect motion capture devices. The Teen Creation Station also included a 3D printer. IT was responsible for the research, ordering, and assembly of these systems.

The Library submitted plans for centralized printing to reduce costs and increase productivity to the City in early 2013 which was approved late in 2013. Replacement equipment will be placed in early 2014. The IT department also submitted plans for an upgrade of all computer systems to a Thin Client solution.

The Library received 24 used computers from Shasta County and six new monitors from the City of Redding. These items replaced older and broken systems and monitors.

Sha sta Public Libraries 2013 Year End Annual Report Page 10 Grants and Donations The Library received a variety of grants and donations in 2013. The branches have their respective Friends groups that raise money, primarily for collections and programming. The Shasta Library Foundation contributes from its growing endowment and also actively seeks funding from other sources including local service clubs and philanthropic foundations. LSSI staff obtained grants for adult literacy, children’s programs, and adult programs. Individuals and groups continued to make generous contributions to the Library. Our thanks to Anderson Family Endowed Fund, Anderson Rotary, Anderson Valley Garden Club, Cal Humanities, California State Library, Chiropractic First, Ducky Derby Foundation, First 5 Shasta, McConnell Fund at the Shasta Regional Community Foundation, Redding Breakfast Lions Club, Redding Emblem Club, Redding Rotary, Scripps Howard (Redding Record Searchlight), United Way, U.S. Bank, The Women’s Fund for their donations..

In an effort to continue and increase funds for Zip Books, an alternative to resource sharing and interlibrary loan, the library participated in Zip Books for Rural Libraries, a statewide project of the California State Library and Califa. This grant helped expand the Zip Books model to 16 rural libraries. The library participated as a consultant to the grant, in addition to receiving $15,000 for Zip Books for Redding, Anderson, and Burney. For the Shasta Public Libraries, the program began October 10, 2013, with 83 customers requesting items, and 143 Zip Books ordered and delivered to their homes. In addition to print books, this grant allowed the library to also include audiobooks. Ordering of Zip Books with this grant will continue into 2014 as funds permit.

A significant grant from the California State Library consisted of $10,000 for materials purchased in specific categories in the Books4U program. $8,000 was used for Redding materials, $1,000 for Anderson, and $1,000 for Burney. Items were purchased in the following categories, as outlined in the grant: popular fiction, children’s, teens, early literacy/parenting, workforce development and core reference.

Once again, the Redding Library received a grant from Cal Humanities for the CA Reads program. The theme for the upcoming community read is “War Comes Home” and the book chosen by Cal Humanities is What It Is Like to Go to War by Karl Marlantes. In the fall of 2014, the library will be organizing programs and events. This theme fits very well with the existing Veterans Resource Center that the library currently offers.

A unique donation was the gift of an electronic piano from the local Piano Angels organization to the Redding Library. The goal of the Piano Angels was to place the piano in a public place for all to access. The piano is kept in the Fireside Room and can be “checked out” with a library card.

We received $327,425 from grants and donations, as follows:

Redding Library $ 227,251 Anderson Library $ 14,373 Burney Library $ 13,192 Adult Literacy Program $ 72,609 Total Received in Grants $ 327,425

Sha sta Public Libraries 2013 Year End Annual Report Page 11

Staff Three Library staff members received LSSI star awards for excellent customer service.

Staff training emphasized strong customer service and safety. All staff attended “Extreme Emergency Training” offered by the Redding Police Department and watched the video Run! Hide! Fight! developed by Homeland Security. Additional training topics included OverDrive, Polaris, library programming, Common Core, book repair, and grant management. Staff took advantage of the many webcasts offered by LSSI and Infopeople, the training division of the California State Library.

Our Head of Youth Services attended the American Library Association conference in Chicago with the help of a training grant from the NorthNet Library System.

Staff in the Children’s Department participated in trainings throughout the year such as, Promoting Literacy with 21st Century Tools, training by early childhood expert Bev Bos, Common Core Curriculum, Teen Volunteer Programs:There’s more than simply shelving! and How to fail at Social Media (and how to get it right).

In addition, two members of the children’s staff attended the California Library Association’s Early Learning with Families 2.0, a new state initiative held in Long Beach. The trip and training was funded by a Library Services and Technology Act grant. The training included opportunities for professional development, partnership building, resource sharing (from online tools and templates to regional networking meetings), and small targeted grants.

Volunteers The Library utilized volunteers to complete a variety of tasks. In 2013, 233 individuals donated 21,877 hours of service: 20,480 hours were served at the Redding Library, 1,045 were served at the Anderson Library, and 352 hours at the Burney Library. These hours are equivalent to 11 full time positions. Using the pay rate of a Library Associate, the value of this time is in excess of $217,760.

In April, volunteers were recognized by City and County officials at the annual Volunteer Appreciation Reception. Twenty-, ten-, and five-year pins were distributed. Volunteers that had donated 90 plus hours of services were honored with a name-plate in a library book.

Teen volunteers worked on special projects such as creating readers’ advisory lists, doing preparation work for events, making shadow puppets for storytimes and filming videos on a variety of topics such as democracy. In addition, 10 members of the Teen Advisory Board began training in how to use the Teen Creation Stations and the entire group helped plan teen programs and select materials for the library.

Challenges and Projects for Coming Year The Library staff proposes to build on the success of the past year by undertaking the following activities:

1. Initiate a needs assessment survey, and a GIS-based user information effort to assist in the progress of the existing Strategic Plan.

2. Support the Shasta Library Foundation and respective Friends groups in their fundraising efforts on behalf of the Library.

Sha sta Public Libraries 2013 Year End Annual Report Page 12 3. Seek grant opportunities to support and/or expand the Library programs, services, and collections.

4. Continue to maintain high levels of materials circulation by ensuring popular materials are available to customers in a timely manner, weeding collections appropriately, and using a variety of marketing techniques for all that the library has to offer the community.

5. Continue to work with the LSSI Polaris support team in providing a high quality online catalog and staff knowledgeable in utilizing its many functions.

6. Develop a new web page in co-operation with the City of Redding.

Conclusion The Library is committed to being a key resource in the educational, economic and cultural life of the community. To this end, staff strives to raise the bar for customer service, collection development, reference services, and special programming. The upcoming year will bring challenges and new opportunities that the Library will strive to meet in order to fulfill its mission to provide information, lifelong learning, inspiration and enjoyment to people of all ages through reading and technology.

Sha sta Public Libraries 2013 Year End Annual Report Page 13

ANDERSON CITY COUNCIL PROCLAMATION

POLICE OFFICER WEEK May 11 through 17, 2014 and PEACE OFFICERS’ MEMORIAL DAY May 15, 2014

WHEREAS, there are approximately 900,000 law enforcement officers serving in communities across the United States, including fifteen sworn members of the Anderson Police Department; and

WHEREAS, some 16,000 assaults against law enforcement officers are reported each year, resulting in approximately 60,000 injuries; and

WHEREAS, since the first recorded death in 1791, nearly 19,000 law enforcement officers in the United States have made the ultimate sacrifice and been killed in the line of duty; and

WHEREAS, the names of these dedicated public servants are engraved on the walls of the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial in Washington, D.C. with an 18% increase of on duty officer fatalities this year in the United States; and

WHEREAS, May 15th is designated as Peace Officers’ Memorial Day, with federal law (P.L. 103‐322) directing that all flags be flown at half‐staff on that date in honor of fallen officers and their families; and

WHEREAS, the safety of our citizenry greatly depends on the services of the Anderson Police Department, the Shasta County Sheriff’s Office, the Shasta County Marshal’s Office, and the Redding Police Department, as well as the many state and federal agencies that make up the law enforcement community in Shasta County.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Anderson City Council does hereby proclaim the week of May 11‐ 17, 2014, as National Police Week, and Thursday, May 15, 2014, as Peace Officers’ Memorial Day in the City of Anderson, and urges Anderson residents and civic organizations to salute our dedicated law enforcement professionals.

AND BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED that City of Anderson flags will be flown at half‐staff on Thursday, May 15, 2014, in honor of all peace officers killed in the line of duty.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Corporate Seal of the City of Anderson to be affixed this 6th day of May 2014.

______Debe Hopkins, Mayor

Item 4.1a_ 5/6/2014

ANDERSON CITY COUNCIL PROCLAMATION

PROCLAIMING MAY 2014 AS “VETERANS APPRECIATION MONTH”

WHEREAS, the citizens of the City of Anderson have great admiration and the utmost appreciation for all the local men and women who have selflessly served their country and this community in the armed forces, in order to protect and preserve the freedoms enjoyed by our community and all Americans; and

WHEREAS, freedom is not free, Veterans have paid the price by leaving their families and communities and placing themselves in harms way, for the good of all; and

WHEREAS, Veterans have demonstrated integrity, a commitment to excellence and a determination to do the best job possible, with a wide variety of valuable skills and qualifications such as experience, loyalty, maturity and leadership; and

WHEREAS, Veterans Employment Representatives assigned to the California Employment Development Department offices are committed to ensuring that Veterans receive the services and programs to which they are entitled, and to promoting employer interest in hiring Veterans.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Anderson City Council does hereby proclaim the month of May 2014 as Veterans Appreciation Month, urging all local employers, organized labor, Veterans organizations, and other government leaders to support this worthy campaign to increase employment opportunities for the men and women who have faithfully served our nation.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Corporate Seal of the City of Anderson to be affixed this 6th day of May 2014.

______Debe Hopkins, Mayor of the City of Anderson

Item 4.1b 5/6/2014

CITIZEN REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

The City Council's regularly scheduled meetings are the first and third Tuesday of each month at 6:00p.m. Any citizen may request that a matter within the jurisdiction of the City Council of the City of Anderson be placed on an upcoming City Council Agenda for public discussion. Please fill out this form and, if possible, attach additional information, correspondence or related materials that will help the council members better understand what you desire to accomplish. The City Clerk will inform you of the date the matter will be heard by the City Council. Each speaker will be limited to one Jive {5) minute opportunity to speak unless the City Council makes an exception due to special circumstances.

Date: 4/16/2014

SUBMITTED BY:

NAME: Amarjit Singh

SUBJECT: Vaisakhi Festival & Day for Non-violence

SUMMARY EXPLANATION: Presentation on the 7th Annual Vaisakhi Festival & Day for Non-violence scheduled for Saturday, May 10, 2014.

(For Office Use Only)

ADDRESS: Amarjit Singh, Project Coordinator

530-921-4185 PHONE:

City Council Agenda Date for this item: _ _ 5---'/'-6'---/_2_0_1_4 ______

ITEM 5 . 1 5/6/2014 W clcomc Da\1 7th Annual Vaisakhi Festival 8 Day for Non·violen~e SATURDAY MAY lOth, 2014

at The Sikh Centre 5400 Sikh Centre Drive Anderson CA 96007 Amarjit Singh 530 9214185 Project Coordinator [email protected] Lee Macey & Don Yost 530 241 8421 [email protected] . . Punjabi Food/Snacks, community booths and multicultural performances

~ ~ t.: • ~ ~ • Co-sponsor : Shasta Country Interfaith Forum (530 243 8862) All Welcome! Entry Free! DRAFT ANDERSON CITY COUNCIL MINUTES

Regular Meeting April 15, 2014

REGULAR SESSION

The regular session was called to order at 6:00 p.m.

ROLL CALL

Councilmembers present: Councilmember Day Councilmember Hunt Councilmember Yarbrough Mayor Hopkins

Councilmember absent: Vice‐Mayor Baugh

Also present: City Manager Jeff Kiser, Assistant City Manager/Finance Director Liz Cottrell, Police Chief Michael Johnson, Development Services Director Kristen Maze, Deputy Public Works Director David Durette, and Deputy City Clerk Brenda Hicken.

INVOCATION

Mr. Amarjit Singh, The Sikh Centre, gave the invocation.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Councilmember Hunt led the Pledge of Allegiance.

PRESENTATION

Mark Lascelles, Shasta Economic Development Corporation, introduced board members Michael Pohlmeyer and Brad Frost. Mr. Lascelles gave a PowerPoint demonstration and updated the Council on economic development services provided to the City of Anderson from January – March 2014.

PUBLIC COMMENT ON ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA

Susan Bear addressed the Council about a disturbing the peace complaint she has about a generator noise that she can’t find the source of. She said it’s been going on for six months and she just wishes it would stop at night. She said it is on 24/7 most of the time. She lives on

The City of Anderson is an Equal Opportunity Provider

ITEM 6.1 5/06/2014 City Council Meeting April 15, 2014 DRAFT Page 2 of 4

Dersch Road, which is outside the City limits. Chief Johnson asked for a chance to look into it and asked for about a week to do so.

CONSENT AGENDA

Councilmember Yarbrough asked to have Item 6.9 removed from the consent agenda.

By motion made, seconded (Hunt/Day), and carried by a 4‐0 vote, the Council took the following actions:

Approved the minutes of the regular meeting of April 1, 2014.

Received and filed warrant 130018 to 130097 in the amount of $239,049.17; warrant 130098 to 130161 in the amount of $57,865.30, and an ACH in the amount of $1,190.13.

Waived reading, except by title, of any ordinances under consideration at this meeting for either introduction or passage per Government Code Section 36934.

Enacted (second reading) Ordinance No. 786 revising Anderson Municipal Code Chapter 2.48, regarding the Planning Commission, as introduced (first reading) on April 1, 2014.

Vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Hunt, Day, Yarbrough, and Mayor Hopkins. Noes: None. Abstain: None. Absent: Councilmember Baugh.

ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR

ENACT (SECOND READING) ORDINANCE NO. 787 UPDATING THE ANDERSON MUNICIPAL CODE, AMENDING AND ADDING PROVISIONS RELATING TO A VARIETY OF HEALTH AND SAFETY VIOLATIONS AND ADDING A PROCESS TO PERMIT AND REGULATE SPECIAL EVENTS

Councilmember Yarbrough stated he is very concerned about Sections 8.15.010 and 8.15.030. Mayor Hopkins stated she is uncomfortable with other parts—the park, camping, beer. She said she would like to see the language more clear and definitive.

Police Chief Johnson answered questions from the Council. He suggested pulling the item if the Council is uncertain about it.

City Council Meeting April 15, 2014 DRAFT Page 3 of 4

The Council gave direction to the City Manager to schedule a workshop at the start of the next City Council meeting, when the City Attorney will be here, so they can go over the items they have questions on.

REGULAR AGENDA

CITY MANAGER

COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT FOR PART‐TIME UNREPRESENTED EMPLOYEES; RESOLUTION NO. 14‐18

City Manager Jeff Kiser gave a staff report and answered questions from the Council.

By motion made, seconded (Yarbrough/Day), and carried by a 4‐0 vote, the Council adopted Resolution No. 14‐18 approving a 9% pay increase effective June 7, 2014, for part‐time, unrepresented employees.

Vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Yarbrough, Day, Hunt, and Mayor Hopkins. Noes: None. Abstain: None. Absent: Councilmember Baugh.

PROPOSED TAX SHARING AGREEMENT WITH THE ANDERSON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FOR FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES FOR THE PROPOSED 385 ACRES FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ANDERSON CITY LIMITS

Mayor Hopkins announced this item is being removed from the agenda because there is no agreement with the Anderson Fire Protection District per the City Manager.

SUCCESSOR AGENCY

FINDING OF COMPLETION ISSUED BY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE; RESOLUTION NO. 14‐19

Assistant City Manager/Finance Director Liz Cottrell gave a staff report. There were no questions from the Council.

By motion made, seconded (Hunt/Yarbrough), and carried by a 4‐0 vote, the Council received and filed the Department of Finance (DOF) Finding of Completion, and adopted Resolution No. 14‐19 approving the Successor Agency Long Range Property Management Plan.

Vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Hunt, Yarbrough, Day, and Mayor Hopkins. Noes: None. Abstain: None. Absent: Councilmember Baugh. City Council Meeting April 15, 2014 DRAFT Page 4 of 4

AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT WITH CALIFORNIA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY (CALHFA) FOR THE HELP LOAN FOR THE LOS ROBLES PROJECT; RESOLUTION NO. 14‐20

Assistant City Manager/Finance Director Liz Cottrell gave a staff report and answered questions from the Council.

Councilmember Yarbrough said he wished to send a thank you to Les Baugh for suggesting the City go back and ask for no interest to be charged, saving the City thousands of dollars.

By motion made, seconded (Yarbrough/Day) and carried by a 4‐0 vote, the Council adopted Resolution No. 14‐20, approving the Oversight Board approved Loan Amendment with California Housing Agency for the HELP Loan.

Vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Yarbrough, Day, Hunt, and Mayor Hopkins. Noes: None. Abstain: None. Absent: Councilmember Baugh.

COUNCIL REPORTS/COMMENTS

Councilmembers used this time to report on meetings and activities they participated in and to announce upcoming events. Councilmember Hunt reported she attended a Community Services Policy Committee Meeting on April 4th in Ontario.

ADJOURNMENT

7:01p.m.: The City Council adjourned to May 6, 2014.

______Debe Hopkins, Mayor

ATTEST:

______Brenda Hicken, Deputy City Clerk AGENDA ITEM

!May 6, 2014 City Council Meetind

ottrell, Finance Director/Treasurer

To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council

Through: Jeff Kiser, City Manager

From: Liz Cottrell, Finance Director /Treasurer

Date: May 6, 2014

!sUBJECT

Receive and File Weekly Warrant Registers.

!RECOMMENDATION

Receive and file warrant 130162 to 130218 in the amount of $247,809.33; Receive and file warrant 130219 to 130285 in the amount of$218,779.35; Receive and file warrant 130286 to 130340 in the amount of $29,434.36; Receive and file ACH in the amount of $1,190.13.

!ATTACHMENTS Warrant Registers.

ITEM 6.2 PAGEl 05/06/2014 Check Register Report

Date: 04/11/2014 Time: 9:03am City of Anderson BANK: NORTH VALLEY BANK Page: 1 Check Check Status Void/Stop Vendor Vendor Name Check Description Amount Number Date Date Number

NORTH VALLEY BANK Checks 130162 04/11/2014 Printed 05197 ADAMS VIDEO PRODUCTIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 512.11 130163 04/11/2014 Printed 1020 ANDERSON GLASS SUPPLIES 284.80 130164 04/11/2014 Printed 1050 ANDERSON VETERINARY CLC, SPAY & NEUTER CERT 20.00 INC 130165 04/11/2014 Void 04/11/2014 Void Check 0.00 130166 04/11/2014 Printed 111011 AT&T CALNET PHONE CHARGES 410.33 130167 04/11/2014 Void 04/11/2014 Void Check 0.00 130168 04/11/2014 Printed 111011 AT&T CALNET PHONE CHARGES 1,551 .83 130169 04/11/2014 Void 04/11/2014 Void Check 0.00 130170 04/11/2014 Printed 1133 BASIC LAB,INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,322.40 130171 04/11/2014 Printed 118023510 BRANOM INSTRUMENT CO. SUPPLIES 558.42 130172 04/11/2014 Printed 1210 CALIFORNIA SAFETY CO. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,152.50 130173 04/11/2014 Printed 1323 CITY NATIONAL BANK ANIMAL SHELTER LOAN #04-021 14,311.89 130174 04/11/2014 Printed 132201 CITY OF REDDING UTILITIES 624.91 130175 04/11/2014 Printed 132203 CITY OF REDDING LIBRARY CONTRIBUTION 2,675.58 130176 04/11/2014 Printed 1350 COM-PAIR SERVICES EQUIPMENT RENTAL 100.00 130177 04/11/2014 Printed 12051105 CPOA REGISTRATION-JOHNSON 35.00 130178 04/11/2014 Printed 12051105 CPOA REGISTRATION-HARPHAM 35.00 130179 04/11/2014 Printed 143820 D & J MAINTENANCE MONTHLY UST TESTING 65.00 130180 04/11/2014 Printed 1480 DEPT OF JUSTICE FINGERPRINT APPLICATIONS 211.00 130181 04/11/2014 Printed 1520 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,705.00 CORP. 130182 04/11/2014 Printed 05808 FASTENERS INC. SUPPLIES 165.37 130183 04/11/2014 Printed 16605 GALLS SUPPLIES 244.24 130184 04/11/2014 Printed 17210 GRAINGER SUPPLIES 10.20 130185 04/11/2014 Printed 1850430 INLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS MONTHLY OVERAGE 25.42 130186 04/11/2014 Printed 1875 JMB OIL COMPANY SUPPLIES 159.64 130187 04/11/2014 Printed 198206 MAXX MINI STORAGE MONTHLY RENT 98.00 130188 04/11/2014 Printed 198787 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY CO. SUPPLIES 119.48 130189 04/11/2014 Printed 198501 MEEK'S - TWIN VIEW SUPPLIES 150.49 130190 04/11/2014 Printed 19756 MGT OF AMERICA, INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,900.00 130191 04/11/2014 Printed 2040 MT. SHASTA SPRING WATER DRINKING WATER 108.04 130192 04/11/2014 Printed 2042 MUNICIPAL MTNC. EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES 593.15 130193 04/11/2014 Printed 20651 NCCSIF WORKERS COMPENSATION 45,978.50 QTRLY 130194 04/11/2014 Printed 2090 NORMAC SUPPLIES 107.02 130195 04/11/2014 Printed 4074 NORTHERN LIGHTS ENERGY, FUEL CHARGES 1,933.41 INC. 130196 04/11/2014 Printed 30397 O'REILLY AUTO PARTS PARTS 13.96 130197 04/11/2014 Printed 3050 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES 922.35 130198 04/11/2014 Printed 305059 OFFICE OF WATER PROGRAMS ENROLLMENT/SUPPLIES-BRANDT 50.00 130199 04/11/2014 Printed 4000 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC UTILITIES 86.61 130200 04/11/2014 Void 04/11/2014 Void Check 0.00 130201 04/11/2014 Printed 4000 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC UTILITIES 29,439.42 130202 04/11/2014 Printed 4040 PAYLESS BUILDING SUPPLY MATERIALS 360.49 130203 04/11/2014 Printed 40736 PLATT-REDDING SUPPLIES 654.79 130204 04/11/2014 Printed 5060 REDDING PRINTING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 136.53 COMPANY,INC 130205 04/11/2014 Printed 50757 REXEL SUPPLIES 89.77 130206 04/11/2014 Printed 6007 SHAPE PRODUCTS SUPPLIES 301.31 130207 04/11/2014 Printed 6019 SHASCOM DISPATCH SERVICES-4TH QTR 122,452.75 130208 04/11/2014 Printed 708895 THE T-SHIRT FACTORY SUPPLIES 134.38 130209 04/11/2014 Printed 70955 TERRILL'S TRUCK ALIGNMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 268.00 130210 04/11/2014 Printed 80003 THOMSON WEST SUPPLIES 84.23 130211 04/11/2014 Printed 800594 TRI -COUNTIES BANK REDEVELOPMENT LOAN 2,712.99 #310306360 130212 04/11/2014 Printed 80092105 UPS SHIPPING CHARGES 32.46 130213 04/11/2014 Printed 8150 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL MONTHLY MAINTENANCE 1,691.63 130214 04/11/2014 Printed 81597 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 500.00 130215 04/11/2014 Printed 80910 WEST COAST DATA CONNECT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 45.00 INC. 130216 04/11/2014 Printed 80911 WEST COAST INNOVATIONS EQUIPMENT 163.93 130217 04/11/2014 Printed 902811 YMCA 2014 DONATION 5,000.00 Check Register Report

Date: 04/11/2014 Time: 9:03am City of Anderson BANK: NORTH VALLEY BANK Page: 2 Check Check Status Void/Stop Vendor Vendor Name Check Description Amount Number Date Date Number

NORTH VALLEY BANK Checks 130218 04/11/2014 Printed 902977 YOUTH VIOLENCE 2014 DONATION 5,500.00 PREVENTION CNCL Total Checks: 57 Checks Total (excluding void checks): 247,809.33

Total Payments: 57 Bank Total (excluding void checks): 247,809.33

Total Payments: 57 Grand Total (excluding void checks): 247,809.33

4lu/JL{ DATE Check Register Report

Date: 04/18/2014 Time: 10:05 am City of Anderson BANK: NORTH VALLEY BANK Page: 1 Check Check Status Void/Stop Vendor Vendor Name Check Description Amount Number Date Date Number

NORTH VALLEY BANK Checks 130219 04/16/2014 Printed 1206020 CA. HOUSING FINANCE DOWN PAYMENT LOAN 84,000.00 AGENCY #080803-01 130220 04/18/2014 Printed 0541 AIRGAS NCN SUPPLIES 369.71 130221 04/18/2014 Printed 055512 ALLDATA SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 1,612.50 130222 04/18/2014 Printed 05645 AMERICAN FIDELITY INSURANCE PREMIUM MAR-2014 1,747.60 ASSURANCE 130223 04/18/2014 Printed 05644 AMERICAN FIDELITY CAFETERIA 125 P/E 04/11/2014 334.61 ASSURANCE CO 130224 04/18/2014 Printed 1012 ANDERSON FIRE PROTECTION FIRE IMPACT/INSPECTION FEES 9,037.09 DIST. 130225 04/18/2014 Printed 1038 ANDERSON TIRE FACTORY PROFESSIONAL SVCS & 406.62 EQUIPMENT 130226 04/18/2014 Printed 1085 ANIMAL NUISANCE CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 125.00 130227 04/18/2014 Printed 1150 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE HEALTH INS. PREMIUM -HOPKINS 610.78 AND 130228 04/18/2014 Printed 1150 ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE HEALTH INS PREMIUM-HUNT 1,026.00 AND 130229 04/18/2014 Printed 0580 APOA DUES FOR P/E 4/11/2014 560.00 130230 04/18/2014 Printed 11095 AT&T PHONE CHARGES 95.90 130231 04/18/2014 Printed 11135 AXNER EXCAVATING,INC. SUPPLIES 2,541.30 130232 04/18/2014 Printed 1133 BASIC LAB,INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 112.00 130233 04/18/2014 Void 04/18/2014 Void Check 0.00 130234 04/18/2014 Printed 113759 BEST BEST & KRIEGER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 12,252.24 130235 04/18/2014 Printed 120602 CA. DEPT. OF CHILD SUPPORT PAR# 0000024225 P/E 4/11/2014 161.53 SER 130236 04/18/2014 Printed 120602 CA. DEPT. OF CHILD SUPPORT PAR#0002232853 P/E 4/11/2014 69.23 SER 130237 04/18/2014 Printed 1220 CALIFORNIA VISION SERVICE VISION PREMIUM APRIL-2014 262.44 130238 04/18/2014 Printed 131750 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS INTERNET SERVICES 135.99 130239 04/18/2014 Printed 149330 DIV. OF THE STATE ARCHITECT SB 1186 FEE BUSINESS 15.60 LICENSES 130240 04/18/2014 Printed 149330 DIV. OF THE STATE ARCHITECT SB 1186 FEE BUSINESS 24.90 LICENSES 130241 04/18/2014 Printed 149330 DIV. OF THE STATE ARCHITECT SB 1186 FEE BUSINESS 18.90 LICENSES 130242 04/18/2014 Printed 149330 DIV. OF THE STATE ARCHITECT SB 1186 FEE BUSINESS 17.70 LICENSES 130243 04/18/2014 Printed 149330 DIV. OF THE STATE ARCHITECT SB 1186 FEE BUSINESS 192.30 LICENSES 130244 04/18/2014 Printed 151508 DRAKE VEGETATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,200.00 MANAGEMENT 130245 04/18/2014 Printed 1540 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT SDI W/H FOR P/E 4/11/2014 820.10 130246 04/18/2014 Printed 1540 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT STATE W/H FOR P/E 4/11/2014 4,815.80 130247 04/18/2014 Printed 15598 ENGRAVED MEMORIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 261 .23 130248 04/18/2014 Printed 159455 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, SUPPLIES 26.66 INC. 130249 04/18/2014 Printed 1680 GENERAL TEAMSTERS #137 DUES FOR APRIL 2014 1,117.26 130250 04/18/2014 Printed 1750 HACH COMPANY SUPPLIES 125.12 130251 04/18/2014 Printed 176967 ROCKY HARPHAM PER DIEM- TRAINING 7.00 130252 04/18/2014 Printed 18109 HILLYARD, INC. JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 223.42 130253 04/18/2014 Printed 1840 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 457 PLAN #302204 W/H P/E 4/11/2014 2,093.85 130254 04/18/2014 Void 04/18/2014 Void Check 0.00 130255 04/18/2014 Printed 1890 JEFF'S PEST CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 326.00 130256 04/18/2014 Printed 190101 SAMANTHA JONES CLEANING DEPOSIT REFUND 300.00 130257 04/18/2014 Printed 191016 CINDY KASPER CLEANING DEPOSIT REFUND 75.00 130258 04/18/2014 Printed 1980563 MATSON AND ISOM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,435.75 130259 04/18/2014 Printed 1988208 MARYANN MELENDREZ REFUND OVERPAYMENT 6.97 130260 04/18/2014 Printed 201086 JOSH MILLER CLEANING DEPOSIT REFUND 300.00 130261 04/18/2014 Printed 203181 KENNETH MORROW HYDRANT DEPOSIT REFUND 852.27 130262 04/18/2014 Printed 2060 N.C.G.T. TRUST FUND HEALTH INSURANCE PREM -MAY 73,707.00 14 130263 04/18/2014 Printed 2090 NOR MAC SUPPLIES 104.92 130264 04/18/2014 Printed 302935 NORTH VALLEY BUSINESS QUARTERLY LEASE 568.50 SYSTEMS 130265 04/18/2014 Void 04/18/2014 Void Check 0.00 130266 04/18/2014 Printed 4000 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC UTILITIES 357.57 Check Register Report

Date: 04/18/2014 Time: 10:05 am City of Anderson BANK: NORTH VALLEY BANK Page: 2 Check Check Status Void/Stop Vendor Vendor Name Check Description Amount Number Date Date Number

NORTH VALLEY BANK Checks 130267 04/18/2014 Printed 4020 PAINT MART SUPPLIES 150.37 130268 04/18/2014 Printed 40365 PATRICK & COMPANY SUPPLIES 209.48 130269 04/18/2014 Printed 902846 PATIERSON LANDSCAPE-YARD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,342.00 130270 04/18/2014 Printed 40736 PLAIT-REDDING SUPPLIES 293.48 130271 04/18/2014 Printed 4073902 ROBYN POPE-BURGESS REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES 28.23 130272 04/18/2014 Printed 502558 REDDING BRIDGE CLUB UNIT CLEANING DEPOSIT REFUND 500.00 #464 130273 04/18/2014 Printed 5060145 REDDING TELEPHONE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 26.00 ANSWERING 130274 04/18/2014 Printed 6001899 SAFARILAND,LLC SUPPLIES 131.17 130275 04/18/2014 Printed 6090 SHASTA COUNTY INFO. TECH. PC MAINTENANCE-SINTF 911 .68 DEPT 130276 04/18/2014 Printed 70245 SHASTA UNIFORMS SUPPLIES 27.60 130277 04/18/2014 Printed 70401 SHELL FLEET PLUS FUEL CHARGES 47.39 130278 04/18/2014 Printed 70800 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSIGN OF WAGES P/E 4/11/2014 150.00 130279 04/18/2014 Printed 70800 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASSIGN OF WAGES P/E 4/11/2014 45.00 130280 04/18/2014 Printed 8002 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 619.50 130281 04/18/2014 Printed 16735 VCA GATEWAY ANIMAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 241 .94 HOSPITAL 130282 04/18/2014 Printed 88893580 PAUL WEBB CLEANING DEPOSIT REFUND 500.00 130283 04/18/2014 Printed 80911 WEST COAST INNOVATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 45.00 130284 04/18/2014 Printed 8095716 TARYN WHITE REFUND OVERPAYMENT 11.15 130285 04/18/2014 Printed 809621 BETIY WILHITE PARKS RENTAL REFUND 45.00 Total Checks: 67 Checks Total (excluding void checks): 218,779.35

Total Payments: 67 Bank Total (excluding void checks): 218,779.35

Total Payments: 67 Grand Total (excluding void checks): 218,779.35

04/ 18/ 2014 ACH Members First Credit Union $1,190.13

For Payro ll Ending 04/ 11/2014 Check Register Report

Date: 04/25/2014 Time: 10:51 am City of Anderson BANK: NORTH VALLEY BANK Page: 1 Check Check Status Void/Stop Vendor Vendor Name Check Description Amount Number Date Date Number

NORTH VALLEY BANK Checks 130286 04/25/2014 Printed 050210 AAMIGO IRRIGATION SUPPLY SUPPLIES 77.21 130287 04/25/2014 Printed 055601 AL'S SAW SHOP SUPPLIES 10.70 130288 04/25/2014 Printed 1038 ANDERSON TIRE FACTORY PROFESSIONAL SVCS & 411 .87 EQUIPMENT 130289 04/25/2014 Printed 1083 ANIMAL CARE EQUIPMENT & SUPPLIES 147.01 svs 130290 04/25/2014 Void 04/25/2014 Void Check 0.00 130291 04/25/2014 Printed 111011 AT&T CALNET PHONE CHARGES 67.10 130292 04/25/2014 Printed 1133 BASIC LAB,INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 331.40 130293 04/25/2014 Printed 124757 C.A.P.E. ACCOUNTING MEMBERSHIP 45.00 RENEWAL-CANAVAN 130294 04/25/2014 Printed 120922 CBSC CBSC FEES JAN-MARCH 2014 101 .70 130295 04/25/2014 Printed 12849 MICHAEL & APRIL CENDEJAS WATER DEPOSIT REFUND 13.85 130296 04/25/2014 Printed 1288832 ALl EM CHAO CLEANING DEPOSIT REFUND 500.00 130297 04/25/2014 Printed 131750 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS INTERNET SERVICES 223.98 130298 04/25/2014 Printed 132203 CITY OF REDDING TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENACE 3,000.00 130299 04/25/2014 Printed 1490060 MIKE DE MELLO WATER DEPOSIT REFUND 89.89 130300 04/25/2014 Printed 1460 DEPT OF CONSERVATION STRONG MOTION FEES JAN-MAR 270.92 14 130301 04/25/2014 Printed 1490 DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE 411.52 130302 04/25/2014 Printed 1491210 DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE EQUIPMENT 776.17 130303 04/25/2014 Printed 151928 PABLO MARTINEZ EJARQUE PERMIT REFUND 14-02- ED 14-04 425.00 130304 04/25/2014 Printed 152680 ELITE K-9, INC. SUPPLIES 30.43 130305 04/25/2014 Printed 1530 ELLIS ART AND ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT 1,935.00 130306 04/25/2014 Printed 157863 EVERBANK MONTHLY LEASE 269.31 130307 04/25/2014 Printed 159455 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, SUPPLIES 376.79 INC. 130308 04/25/2014 Printed 16620 SUSAN GALVAN WATER DEPOSIT REFUND 1.55 130309 04/25/2014 Printed 18201 MIKE JR HUBERT WATER DEPOSIT REFUND 8.85 130310 04/25/2014 Printed 18206 HUE & CRY SECURITY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 105.00 SYSTEMS,INC 130311 04/25/2014 Printed 182534134 KATHY HURLEY CREDIT BALANCE REFUND 13.97 130312 04/25/2014 Printed 1897 JOBS AVAILABLE,INC. SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 45.00 130313 04/25/2014 Printed 193191 ELAINE LARSON WATER DEPOSIT REFUND 8.85 130314 04/25/2014 Printed 198223 JENNIFER MCCAY LESS FINAL WATER BILLING 13.85 130315 04/25/2014 Printed 2006 MIKE MILLER WATER DEPOSIT REFUND 7.52 130316 04/25/2014 Printed 20292 TERRY MORAVEC CLEANING DEPOSIT REFUND 350.00 130317 04/25/2014 Printed 3035 NORTHERN CALIF. GLOVES SUPPLIES 116.91 130318 04/25/2014 Void 04/25/2014 Void Check 0.00 130319 04/25/2014 Void 04/25/2014 Void Check 0.00 130320 04/25/2014 Printed 3050 OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES 635.88 130321 04/25/2014 Printed 3069 OMNI MEANS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 640.00 130322 04/25/2014 Printed 3080 PACE ENGINEERING, INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,175.50 130323 04/25/2014 Printed 4000 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC UTILITIES 14.02 130324 04/25/2014 Printed 40570150 MARIA PEREZ WATER DEPOSIT REFUND 13.85 130325 04/25/2014 Printed 40570115 PET TOWN SUPPLIES 64.49 130326 04/25/2014 Printed 47399 POWER CURVE WATER DEPOSIT REFUND 7.36 130327 04/25/2014 Printed 407509 PROFORCE SUPPLIES 343.68 130328 04/25/2014 Printed 50100 RAY MORGAN CO. MONTHLY LEASE 184.14 130329 04/25/2014 Printed 502024 RECORD SEARCHLIGHT ADVERTISING 134.60 130330 04/25/2014 Printed 60356 SHASTA CO. ARTS COUNCIL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 143.00 130331 04/25/2014 Printed 6050 SHASTA CO.OPPORTUNITY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,500.00 CENTER 130332 04/25/2014 Printed 7050 SIERRA CHEMICAL CO. SUPPLIES 1,975.17 130333 04/25/2014 Printed 70871 SUPERIOR CA ECONOMIC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,685.66 DEVELOP 130334 04/25/2014 Printed 80037 MARJORIE TIMMONS CLEANING DEPOSIT REFUND 350.00 130335 04/25/2014 Printed 80092105 UPS SHIPPING CHARGES 11 .63 130336 04/25/2014 Void 04/25/2014 Void Check 0.00 130337 04/25/2014 Printed 81539 VERIZON WIRELESS PHONE CHARGES 1,180.82 130338 04/25/2014 Printed 80911 WEST COAST INNOVATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,012.35 130339 04/25/2014 Printed 902904701 CINDY YOUNG CREDIT BALANCE REFUND 25.08 Check Register Report

Date: 04/25/2014 Time: 10:51 am City of Anderson BANK: NORTH VALLEY BANK Page: 2 Check Check Status Void/Stop Vendor Vendor Name Check Description Amount Number Date Date Number

NORTH VALLEY BANK Checks 130340 04/25/2014 Printed 90359 ZEP MANUFACTURING SUPPLIES 150.78 COMPANY Total Checks: 55 Checks Total (excluding void checks): 29,434.36

Total Payments: 55 Bank Total (excluding void checks): 29,434.36

Total Payments: 55 Grand Total (excluding void checks): 29,434.36

1/;o/tlf DATE AGENDA ITEM

IMay 06,2014 City Council Meetin~

To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council

Through: Jeff Kiser, City Manager

From: Liz Cottrell, Finance Director /Treasurer

Date: May 06,2014

IsUBJECT

Quarterly Treasurer's Report on City Investments

IRECOMMENDATION

The Finance Director recommends that the City Council:

Receive and file the quarterly treasurer's report for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2014.

I FISCAL IMPACT

This action has no direct fiscal impact. The report is for information purposes only.

IDISCUSSION and BACKGROUND

State law requires the City Treasurer to report every fiscal quarter to the City Council about the city's investments. The attached report includes complete information about the city treasury and certifies that the city's investments are in accordance with state law and the Council's adopted investment policy.

IATTACHMENTS Quarterly Treasurer's Report and Certification for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2014.

ITEM ..2.:._6 PAGEt 05/06/14 Attachment 1

City of Anderson Quarterly Certification of Compliance with Investment Policy Quarter Ended March 31, 2014

A. Section 8.1 of the City's Investment Policy restricts the amount of pooled funds which inay be invested in certain types of investments. These types of investments and a statement of compliance are below.

Investment T~ Maximum investment Current Investment Percent of Total Below Maximum?

Banker's Acceptances 15% of Total Portfolio $0 0.00% Yes Certificates of Deposit 30% of Total Portfolio $0 0.00% Yes Prime Commercial Paper 15% of Total Portfolio $0 0.00% Yes Medium-term Corporate Notes 15% of Total Portfolio $0 0.00% Yes

B. Section 13.1 of the City's Investment Policy restricts the overall maturities of pooled investments. These restrictions and a statement of compliance are below.

Maturity Investment Restriction Current Investment Percent of Total Limit Met?

Within One Year 50% of Total- Minimum $6,627,199 100.00% Yes Between Three and Five Years 25% of Total- Maximum $0 0.00% Yes Over Five Years None Allowed $0 0.00% Yes

C. Section 13.1 of the City's Investment Policy provides that the average investment maturity must be less than three years.

Weighted Average Days to Maturity of Treasurer's Pool: Restriction Met?: Yes

I hereby certify that as of March 31 , 2014 the investment of the City of Anderson comply in all respects with the requirements of the California Government Code and the City's current Investment Policy and that there is sufficient cash flow to cover the next six months expenditures.

Certifiedby' ~ Liz C~ rell,~Treasurer City of Anderson Quarterly Report on the Treasurer's Investment Pool Quarter Ended March 31, 2014

Percent of Days to Credit Rating Total Issuer Yield to Maturity Rate Maturity Par Value Book Value Market Value (Notes) Investments Checking and Passbook accounts

Primary Checking North Valley Bank na na na 746,532 746,532 746,532 na Payroll Checking North Valley Bank na na na 1,000 1,000 1,000 na Passbook Savings North Valley Bank na 0.03% na 33,231 33,231 33,231 na REDIP Reserve Acct North Valley Bank na 0.03% na 21,157 21,157 21,157 na Money Market North Valley Bank na 0.20% na 262,155 262,155 262,155 na Subtotal 1,064,075 1,064,075 1,064,075 16.06%

Certificates of Deposit 0 0 0.00%

Local Agency Investment Fund Local Agency Investment Fund na na 0.024% 1 5,562,274 5,562,274 5,562,274 na 83.93%

Petty Cash Petty Cash na na na na 850 850 850 na 0.013%

Total Funds Held by the City of Anderson on March 31, 2014 6,627,199 6,627,199 6,627,199 100.0% Total Funds Held by the City of Anderson on December 31, 2013 3,452,417 3,452,417 3,452,417 3,174,782 3,174,782 3,174,782

Weighted Average Yields 0.028% Weighted Average Days to Maturity Percent Maturing within One Year 100.00% Percent Maturing between One and Three Years 0.00% Percent Maturing between Three and Five Years 0.00% City of Anderson Quarterly Report on Funds Held Outside the Treasurer's Pool Quarter Ended March 31, 2014

Issuer Yield to Maturity Rate Maturity Date Par Value Book Value Market Value

Superior California Economic Development District Checking Account North Valley Bank na 0.02% na 5,555 5,555 5,555

Amerinational Community Services Group na na na 140 140 140

Funds Held by Trustee (US Bank) for Redevelopment Agency (2005) 0.02% na na 177,559 177,559 177,559

Funds Held by Trustee (US Bank) for Redevelopment Agency (2008) 0.02% na na 349,326 349,326 349,326

Funds Held by Trustee (Union Bank) for Wastewater Bonds 0.00% na na

ICMA Retirement Corporation Employee Directed Investments na na na 1,885,155 1,885,155 1,885,155

Total Funds Held by the City of Anderson Outside the Treasurer's Investment Pool on March 31, 2014 2,417,735 2,417,735 2,417,735 Total Funds Held by the City of Anderson Outside the Treasurer's Investment Pool on December 31, 2013 2,427,878 2,427,878 2,427,878 Difference (1 0, 143) (10, 143) (10, 143) AGENDA ITEM !May 6, 2012 City Council Meetin~

To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council

Through: Jeff Kiser, City Manager

From: Kristen Maze, Development Services Director

Date: May 6, 2012

IsUBJECT

Public Hearing - The City of Anderson Annual Housing Production Report

I RECOMMENDATION

The Development Services Director recommends that the City Council:

1. Conduct a Public Hearing, and

2. Receive the Annual Housing Production Report.

I FISCAL IMPACT

None. The Annual Housing Production Report is prepared pursuant to California Government Code Section 65400 (a)(2) which in part requires an agency to report annually to its legislative body on the progress in meeting its share of regional housing needs. This report demonstrates that the [ it:y of Anderson is meeting the housing needs mandated by the State and ensures that grant monies will continue to be available to the City.

ITEM 7.0 PAGEl 5/6/14 IDISCUSSION and BACKGROUND

Pursuant to the State Government Code Section 65584, the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) developed a Regional Housing Need Allocation Plan for Shasta County. The RHNA Plan identifies a minimum need for residential units in all of Shasta County, including incorporated cities, over a 7.5 year period (January 2007 to June 2014). The purpose of this plan is to ensure that all cities and counties provide for housing needs of persons of all income levels within their jurisdiction.

This Annual Housing Production Report is prepared as per Government Code Section 65400 (a)(2) which requires an agency to report by April 1 of each year to its legislative body on the progress in meeting its share of regional housing needs. This document along with the mandated form constitutes the seventh annual report describing the City's progress in producing housing from January 01, 2013 to December 31, 2013. This report represents Anderson's estimated share of the region's forecasted growth for the four income groups identified in state law.

In summary, between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013, 34 single-family residential dwelling were constructed and finaled in the City, with no multiple-family housing being developed. These 34 single-family dwellings were all considered moderate income housing. In 2009 the City of Anderson adopted the General Plan Housing Element and as a result the City amended the zoning codes to be consistent with the newly updated Housing Element and the State regulations. These amendments included adding residential uses as permitted uses or conditionally permitted uses; adding a density bonus ordinance consistent with State law; removing second dwelling unit restrictions; and adding definitions for low income dwelling units. In addition, the City will be amending our Municipal codes to include emergency shelter provisions and reasonable accommodations for person(s) with disabilities seeking equal access to housing.

These modifications are all necessary to demonstrate implementation of the City's housing element to the State. This is relevant because the State Department of Housing and Community Development monitors the implementation of housing elements and may consider the City's progress when awarding grant funding.

!ATTACHMENT

1. Annual Housing Production Report

ITEM 7.0 PAGE2 5/6/14 ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT ATTACHMEN'I' 1 on Housing Element Implementation (CCR Title 25 Section 6202)

Table C Program Implementation Status

Program Description Housing Programs Progress Report - Government Code Section 65583. Describe progress of ali programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element. Name of Program: Objective: Deadline Status of Program Implementation in H.E. Program 1.1: Implement Code Standards that allow for a variety of Meet Regional Share Ongoing Ongoing Progress housinq

Use Minimum standards as set Ongoing City of Anderson uses Design Review for ali residential over 3- Program 1:2: High Quality in New Residential Development forth in Anderson Code for units, industrial and commercial projects. Design Review.

Provide flyers or brochure at Ongoing City currently allows second units pursuant to Anderson Program 1.3: Second Units permit counter and web site to Municipal Code Section 17.06.030. I promote second units.

Consistent with State Law Ongoing City uses pre-application meetings to discuss density bonus Program 1.4: Density Bonuses and other Regulatory incentives units.

Increase the quality of Ongoing Ongoing review of residential design for 3 or more units. Program 1.5: Density Bonuses for Quality Housing Design residential developments and design.

Assist 25-first time home Ongoing City of Anderson assisted 4 families using its Down payment Program 1.6: Promote Homeownership for Low and Moderate buyers. Assistance Program (DAP) in reporting years 2010-2012. This income households. past calendar year the City has not assisted fam ily using DAP .

Facilitate greater variety of Ongoing The revised 2007 General Pian and zoning res ulted in allowing Program 1.7: Senior and Affordable Housing Combing District housing types and cost for higher densities for residential housing, including senior and seniors. affordable housirl_[.

Secure adequate funding to Ongoing The City continues Home Reuse and applied for HOME and Program 1.8: Continue to Use State, Federal and Private funding meet the City's tow and TAG for Regency Ptace(Seasons) Senior 80 unint Apts Phase II programs moderate housing needs. that was com~tetedin 2011.

Maintain sufficient sites to Ongoing City currently has adequate land to accomodate additional Program 2.1: Maintain a current and Adequate Land Inventory. accommodate, at minimum housing for ali income levels. Anderson's regional share. l' Increase the development Ongoing The City continually encourages tot mergers on small infiil potential of small tots under parcels to increase development potential. This is not an Program 2.2: Facilitate tot mergers to increase housing single ownership for maximum aggressive program. We provide an annual housing inventory. development potential. development permitted by zoninq . I' 150 housing units, 1DO Ongoing City has updated the City of Anderson General Plan and Zoning I Program 2.3: Residentat Mixed Use and tnfill affordable to tow and very tow Ordinance that includes a mixed use zoning designation for income households. downtown development. I I To allow a cost-effective 2012 City of Anderson wilt apply for grant funding to extend waste i means of providing water and water facilities to the north east area of the City. The CDBG Program 2.4: Private, onsite waste and waste water facilities wastewater services to grant funding has provided water and waste water system residence in very tow density improvements to home owners in need of upgrades in 2013. ' areas of Anderson. I

Facilitate the provision of 2014 Second unit, farm workers housing and transitional housing Program 3.1: Amend the zoning ordinance funding programs alternative house through ordinance was approved in 2011. Emergency shelter and zoning standards. reasonable accomodation ord inance aooroved in 2014.

Faci litate the residential Ongoing The City amended the zoning ordinance to remove potential development for affordable constraints to the availability of housing for all segments of the Program 3.2: Use of Planned Development Process housing. population, allowing transitional housing, farmworker housing, residential density bonus as per State Law and second dwelling units. ' '

Reduce processing times and Ongoing City of Anderson uses a pre-application process to facilitate cost for residential and expedite processing of applications. Program 3.3: Continue to expidite application for residential I development particularly development affordable housing development.

Faci litate the production and Ongoing City of Anderson uses the California Historical Building Code rehabilitation of historic and Part 8, Title 24, CA Code Regulations for assessing historical Program 3.4: Continue Flexible tmptementaiton of building code affordable housing and the buildings. standards. conversion of suitable structures for residential use.

Update information on housing 2014 Grant funding for this task for 2012/2013 was not available. Program 4.1: Conduct housing conditions survey. condition to better target Last housing survey was completed in 2005. rehabilitation efforts.

Rehabilitate 50 dwelling units. 2009-2014 City of Anderson has assisted five families for the year 2012 with one loan, and four rehabilitions grant funds. In the year Program 4.2: Housing Rehabilitation Program. 2013 nine families were given assistance, 3 with loans and 6 rehabilitation grant funding .

Support rehabilitate of ail rental Ongoing City of Anderson issued renovation permits for two tow income housing units. rental apartment complexes in 2011 . The City has successfully Program 4.3: Improve the Condition of Rental Housing assisted families with rehabilitation of homes see program 4.2. Name of Program: Objective: Deadline Status of Program Implementation in H.E.

To improve the residential Ongoing City of Anderson continues to use code enforcement to gain building conditions. compliance with ali building codes. The City updated there Program 4.4. Address Unsafe Building Conditions. code enforcement ordinance to ensure compliance. The City is proposing to adopt a rental houseing inspection program to insure building code compliance.

To ensure that historic Ongoing City of Anderson maintains a design review committee to Program 4.5: Preserve historic and architecturally significant preservation is considered in review changes to historic buildings and our Downtown Mixed- residential structures. the implementation of plans. Use zone district is designed to preserve historic buildings.

To conserve the affordability of Ongoing City of Anderson continues have a number of apartment Program 5.1: Conserve the affordabiiity or subsidized rental the rental housing stock. complex's that offer affordable house, two apartment complex's housing in Anderson have been recently remodeled.

Conserve the affordability and Ongoing City of Anderson maintains jurisdiction for enforcement of the condition of mobile homes mobile home park-s and will continue to preserve housing within Program 5.2: Mobile Home Parks within the mobile home parks. the existing parks.

To conserve the affordability of Ongoing Ongoing Program 5.3: Existing Affordable Market Rate Rental housing the rental housing stock. I Increase the availability of Ongoing The City of Anderson accomplishes this program by acting as a I housing vouchers in Anderson referral service to inquiring landlords through the distribution of Program 5.4: Federal Housing Vouchers. and rental property owne~s pamphlets. acceptance of vouchers.

At least ten percent of new 2014 In its fourth year of the Housing Element the City of Anderson Program 6.1: Encourage the Production of Housing for large Multifamily units should be has not approved any new multi-family developments. families three or four bedrooms.

To meet a portion of the City's Ongoing See program 2.3 affordable housing needs Program 6:2 : Special Needs Housing on lnfill Sites through mixed-use and infill l oroiects.

Homeless Services Ongoing Program 6:3 : Homeless Services The City of Anderson refers the homeless to our local homeless consortium, Good New Rescue Mission and local Churches.

To provide a continuum of care Ongoing The City has continued to enforce State and Federal Standards for seniors in Anderson. for accessibility of multifamily buildings. The City promotes Program 6:4 : Continuum of Care for Seniors existing multifamily structures to meet current standards through Program 4.2.

To increase the accessibility of Ongoing See program(s) 4.2, 4.3 and 6.4 Program 6:5 : Accessibility of Housing for Persons with multifamily buildings to person disabilities. with disabilities.

Same as program 1 .4-1.8 Ongoing See Program 1.4-1.8 Program 6:6: Special Needs Housinq for Low-Income households

Ongoing The City continues to provide pre-applications meetings that To increase the availability of, help identify any special needs support for a project. See Program 6:7 : Supportive Services for Special Needs Groups and access to special services Program 1.4-1 .8 by special needs groups.

Ongoing The City of Anderson adopted the 2010 building codes, which Ensure that all new residential include updated energy requirements. Program 7.1 : Energy conservation in residential construction construction meets California minimum standard for energy efficiency.

To increase residential energy Ongoing See program(s) 4.2 and 4.3 efficiency, reduce residential Program 7.2: Energy conservation in residential land use planning energy consumption and reduce residential energy costs.

Promote energy efficiency Ongoing See program(s) 4.2 and 4.3 improvements as part of its Program 7.3: improve the Energy Efficiency of Older Homes marketing efforts of the housing rehabilitation program.

Promote equal housing Ongoing The Development Service Department provides information to Program 8.1 : Promote equal housing opportunities opportunities for all City the public and provides referrals. residents. I

To promote equal housing Ongoing City of Anderson partners with Legal Services of Northern Program 8.2: Organize fair housing event opportunities for all Anderson California to conduct an Annual Fair Housing Workshop. residents. AGENDA ITEM IMay 6, 2014 City Council Meetin~

To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council

Through: Development Services

From: Kristen Maze, Development Services Director Telephone 378-6643

Date: May 6, 2014 jSUBJECT

Public Hearing - Amendment to the City of Anderson Zoning Ordinance adding Chapter 17.03 Reasonable Accommodations consistent with the adopted General Plan Housing Element

I RECOMMENDATION

The Development Services Department of the City of Anderson recommends that the City Council:

1. Conduct a public hearing regarding the Zoning Ordinance Revisions; and,

2. Introduce an Ordinance (First Reading), adding Chapter 17.03 to the Anderson Municipal Code, and set it for enactment on May 20, 2014 (Second Reading).

3. Direct the City Clerk to read. the 0rdinance by title only.

I FISCAL IMPACT

The proposed ordinance change will not have any direct impact on City finances. These modifications are important to demonstrate implementation of the City's housing element to the State. This is relevant because the State Department of Housing and Community ITEM 7.1 PAGEt 5/6/14 Development monitors the implementation of Housing Elements and may consider the City's progress when awarding grant funding.

IDISCUSSION and BACKGROUND

When the City of Anderson adopted the Housing Element on December 15, 2009, the policies contained within that element called for changes to the City's zoning ordinance in order to be consistent with State regulations. For example, to implement programs HE.1.3 Second Units, HE.1.4 Density Bonus, HE.1.5 Density Bonus for Quality Housing Design, and HE.3.1 Farm Workers housing and Transitional housing and Reasonable Accommodations for individuals with Disabilities, the City of Anderson needed to amend relevant sections of the Municipal Code. All of these key programs were adopted by the City Council in Ordinance 771 in March, 2011, with the exception of the Reasonable Accommodations for individuals with Disabilities.

Tonight's proposal is a follow-up to the previous amendments adopted to fulfill the Housing Element program 3.1 which requires Cities to provide procedures for citizens to request a reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities seeking equal access to housing under the Federal Fair Housing Act and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act in the application of zoning laws and other land use regulations, policies and procedures. This final addition to the Anderson Municipal Code will meet the Housing and Community Development (HCD) criteria which will allow for our Housing Element Update to be eligible for streamlining. Essentially this means that the City will not have to start from the beginning and that HCD will review our Housing Element Update knowing that the City has implemented all the necessary codes that remove unnecessary constraints to the availability of housing for all segments of the population.

The proposed change to the Municipal Code includes adding Chapter 17.03 Reasonable Accommodations shown in Attachment 1.

CALIFORNIA ENVRIONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS:

The proposed change is consistent with the City of Anderson General Plan, in which an Environmental Impact Report (SCH#2006092026) was certified in May 2007. In addition, the City of Anderson adopted a Negative Declaration for the General Plan Housing Element in December 2009. It is staffs opinion that the adoption of the above described amendments are exempt from further environmental review under CEQA pursuant to Section 15061 (b) (3) of the CEQA Guidelines, which state;

The activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for [email protected]!J.5ilny a significant effect on the environment. Where it [email protected] be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

Prior to adoption of the amendment, the City would need to make a finding that "it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that adoption of the amendment may have a

ITEM 7.1 PAGE2 5/6/14 significant effect on the environment". This finding has been incorporated into the draft ordinance for the project.

The Planning Commission considered the changes to the zoning ordinance at a duly noticed public hearing on April 28, 2014. The Planning Commission found that the proposed revisions to the and Municipal Code were exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act because it could be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that adoption of the amendments may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission recommended the modifications to the City Council for approval.

!ATTACHMENTS

1. An Ordinance adding Anderson Municipal Code Chapter 17.03

ITEM 7.1 PAGE3 5/6/14 ATTACHMENT 1

ORDINANCE NO. __

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDERSON ADDING CHAPTER 17.03 [REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS] OF TITLE 17 [ZONING] OF THE CITY OF ANDERSON MUNICIPAL CODE

WHEREAS, on December 15, 2009 the City Council adopted and approved the 2008- 2014 Housing Element for the City of Anderson ("Housing Element") and a Negative Declaration prepared for the Housing Element; and,

WHEREAS, the Housing Element calls for certain amendments to be made to the City's Zoning Code to implement the programs and policies contained in the Housing Element; and,

WHEREAS, this Ordinance amends the Zoning Code to implement the Housing Element; and,

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on this Ordinance at its April 28, 2014 meeting and voted to recommend the City Council adopt this Ordinance; and,

WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on this Ordinance at its May 6, 2014 meeting; and,

WHEREAS, the adoption of this Ordinance is covered by the Negative Declaration prepared for the Housing Element and certified by the City Council on December 15, 2009, because this Ordinance implements the programs and policies contained in the Housing Element.

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDERSON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Addition of Chapter 17.03 to the Anderson Municipal Code.

A new Chapter 17.03 is hereby added to the Anderson Municipal Code to read as follows:

"17.03 Reasonable Accommodations 17.03.010 Purpose. 17.03.020 Review Authority. 17.03.030 Application for Reasonable Accommodation. 17.03.040 Decision. 17.03.050 Findings. 17.03.060 Expiration, Time Extension, Violation, Discontinuance & Revocation.

RIV #4829-0412-5957 vlO Ordinance No. May 6, 2014 Page 2 of6

Sec. 17.03.010 Purpose.

This chapter provides a procedure to request a reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities seeking equal access to housing under the Federal Fair Housing Act and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (together, the Acts) in the application of zoning laws and other land use regulations, policies, and procedures.

Sec. 17.03.020 Review Authority.

The Director, or his or her designee, is designated to approve, conditionally approve, or deny all applications for reasonable accommodations, provided that the Director may decide to allow the Planning Commission to determine whether to approve, conditionally approve, or deny an appHcation for a reasonable accommodation if the Director finds that the reasonable accommodation application involves significant controversy or extraordinary circumstances.

Sec. 17.03.030 Application for Reasonable Accommodation.

(a) Eligibility. A request for reasonable accommodation may be made by any person with a disability, their representative, or any entity, when the application of a requirement of this Zoning Code or other city requirement, policy, or practice acts as a barrier to fair housing opportunities for a disabled person. A person with a disability is a person who has a physical or mental impairment that limits or substantially limits one or more major life activities, anyone who is regarded as having such impairment or anyone who has a record of such impairment. This section is intended to apply to those persons who are defined as disabled under the Acts. (b) Permissible Accommodations. A request for reasonable accommodation may include a modification or exception to the substantive and/ or procedural rules, standards, and practices for the siting, development, and use of housing or housing-related facilities that would eliminate regulatory barriers and provide a person with a disability equal opportunity to housing of their choice. (c) No Variance. A reasonable accommodation may be granted in compliance with this section without the need for the approval of a variance. (d) Application. An application for a reasonable accommodation shall be made on a form provided by the Planning Department. No fee shall be required for an application for reasonable accommodation. In addition to materials required under other applicable provisions of the Anderson Municipal Code, an application for reasonable accommodation shall include the following: 1. Documentation that the applicant is: (i) disabled; (ii) applying on behalf of one or more disabled persons; or (iii) a developer or provider of housing for one or more disabled persons;

2. The specific exception or modification to the Zoning Code provision, policy, or practices requested by the applicant; Ordinance No. May 6, 2014 Page 3 of6

3. Documentation that the specific exception or modification requested by the applicant is necessary to provide one or more disabled persons an equal opportunity to use and enjoy the residence;

4. Any other information that the director reasonably concludes is necessary to determine whether the findings required by Section 17.295.050(a) can be made, so long as any request for information regarding the disabled person benefited complies with the protections provided by the Acts and the privacy rights of the individuals affected.

(e) Other Discretionary Approvals. If the request for reasonable accommodation is made with another discretionary permit or approval, then the applicant may file the request for reasonable accommodation together with the application for the other discretionary permit or approval, and may elect to have the reasonable accommodation request processed and decided simultaneously with the application for the other discretionary permit. In such cases, the procedures applicable to the other discretionary permit shall govern the processing of the reasonable accommodation request. If the project requires another discretionary permit, then the prescribed fee shall be paid for all other discretionary permits. Sec. 17.03.040 Decision.

(a) Director Decisions. The director shall mail his or her written determination to approve, conditionally approve, or deny a request for a reasonable accommodation to the applicant within thirty (30) days of the receipt of a complete application a reasonable accommodation. (b) Commission and Council Decisions. A written determination on whether to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the request for reasonable accommodation shall be made by the body. For decisions associated with other discretionary approvals, the decision shall be issued at the same time and in the same manner as the decisions on the other discretionary approvals are issued. If there are no associated discretionary approvals, the body shall issue a decision on the reasonable accommodation within thirty (30) days of the reasonable accommodation being first placed on the body's agenda for consideration. (c) Appeals. Any director decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission. A Planning Commission decision may be appealed to the City Council. Appeals must be filed within fourteen (14) days of the decision. Decisions by the City Council are final and not appealable. Sec. 17.03.050 Findings.

(a) Findings. The written decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny a request for a reasonable accommodation shall be based on the following findings, all of which are required for approval or conditional approval of a reasonable accommodation: Ordinance No. May 6, 2014 Page 4 of 6

1. The requested accommodation is requested by or on the behalf of one or more disabled persons protected under the Acts.

2. The requested accommodation is necessary to provide one or more disabled persons an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling.

3. The requested accommodation will not impose an undue financial or administrative burden on the City as "undue financial or administrative burden" is defined in Acts.

4. The requested accommodation will not result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of the City's zoning program, as "fundamental alteration" is defined in the Acts.

5. The requested accommodation will not, under the specific facts of the case, result in a direct threat to the health or safety of other individuals or substantial physical damage to the property of others.

(b) Alternative Accommodations. In making findings, the decision maker may approve alternative reasonable accommodations which provide an equivalent level of benefit to the applicant. (c) Factors - Equal Opportunity. The City may consider, but is not limited to, the following factors in determining whether the requested accommodation is necessary to provide a disabled person an equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling: 1. Whether the requested accommodation will affirmatively enhance the quality of life of one or more disabled persons; 2. Whether a disabled person will be denied an equal opportunity to enjoy the housing type of their choice absent the accommodation; 3. In the case of a group home, whether the requested accommodation is necessary to make facilities of a similar nature or operation economically viable in light of the particularities of the relevant market and market participants; 4. In the case of a group home, whether the existing supply of facilities of a similar nature and operation in the community is sufficient to provide disabled persons and equal opportunity to live in a residential setting. (d) Factors - Fundamental Alteration. The City may consider, but is not limited to, the following factors in determining whether the requested accommodation would require a fundamental alteration in the nature of the City's zoning program: 1. Whether the requested accommodation would fundamentally alter the character of the neighborhood;

2. Whether the accommodation would result in a substantial increase in traffic or insufficient parking; Ordinance No. May 6, 2014 Page 5 of 6

3. Whether granting the requested accommodation would substantially undermine any express purpose of either the City's General Plan or an applicable specific plan;

4. In the case of a group home, whether the requested accommodation would create an institutionalized environment due to the number of and distance between facilities that are similar in nature or operation.

(e) Conditions of Approval. In granting a request for reasonable accommodation, the approving authority may impose any conditions of approval deemed reasonable and necessary to ensure that the reasonable accommodation would comply with the findings. (f) Rules While Decision is Pending. While a request for reasonable accommodation is pending, all laws and regulations otherwise applicable to the property that is the subject of the request shall remain in full force and effect. (g) Effective Date. No reasonable accommodation shall become effective until the decision to grant such accommodation has become final by reason of the expiration of time to make an appeal. In the event an appeal is filed, the reasonable accommodation shall not become effective unless and until a decision is made on such appeal and becomes final. Sec. 17.03.060 Expiration, Time Extension, Violation, Discontinuance and Revocation.

(a) Expiration. Any reasonable accommodation approved in accordance with the terms of this Division shall expire within twenty-four months from the effective date of approval or at an alternative time specified as a condition of approval unless: 1. A building permit has been issued and construction has commenced;

2. A certificate of occupancy has been issued;

3. The use is established; or

4. A time extension has been granted.

(b) Time Extension. 'l'he director may approve a time extension for a reasonable accommodation for good cause for a period or periods not to exceed one year. An application for a time extension shall be made in writing to the director no less than thirty days or more than ninety days prior to the expiration date. 1. Notice of the Director's decision on a time extension shall be provided in the same manner as the notice provided for in 17.295.040(a). All written decisions shall give notice of the right to appeal and to request a reasonable accommodation in the appeals process. 2. A time extension for a reasonable accommodation shall be final unless appealed within fourteen calendar days of the date of mailing of the determination. Ordinance No. May 6, 2014 Page 6 of6

An appeal shall be made in writing and shall be noticed and heard pursuant to the procedures established in this Chapter. (c) Violation of Terms. Any reasonable accommodation approved in accordance with the provisions of this chapter may be revoked if any of the conditions or terms of such reasonable accommodation are violated, or if any law or ordinance is violated in connection therewith. Procedures for revocation shall be as prescribed by Section 17.220 et seq., of this Code. (d) Discontinuance. A reasonable accommodation shall lapse if the exercise of rights granted by it is discontinued for one hundred eighty consecutive days. If the persons initially occupying a residence vacate, the reasonable accommodation shall remain in effect only if the director determines that: (1) the modification is physically integrated into the residential structure and cannot easily be removed or altered to comply with the Code, and (2) the accommodation is necessary to give another disabled person an equal opportunity to enjoy the dwelling. The director may request the applicant or his or her successor in interest to the property to provide documentation that subsequent occupants are disabled persons. Failure to provide such documentation within ten (10) days of the date of a request by the City shall constitute grounds for discontinuance by the City of a previously approved reasonable accommodation. (e) Modifications to Approved Permits. A reasonable accommodation may be modified. Procedures for modification shall be as prescribed by the Development Services Director or his/ her designee.

SECTION 2. Effective Date.

This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its passage by the City Council.

SECTION 3 . Publication

The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published or posted in accordance with Government Code section 36933.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 6th day of May, 2014.

AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:

Debe Hopkins, Mayor ATTEST:

Juanita Barnett, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM

May 6, 2014, City Council Meeting

Approved for Submittal By:

Je To Be Presented By: <

To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council

From: Jeff Kiser, City Manager

Date: May 6, 2014

IsUBJECT

Vineyards Water Reimbursement Agreement - Request to amend the repayment formula

I RECOMMENDATION

The City Manager recommends that the City Council:

1. Consider the following alternatives and give direction to staff:

A. Modifying the number of lots to include all of the existing finished lots and decreasing the fee to $3,000 per lot.

B. Removing the annual 5% compounded fee increase, or modify the percentage of increase to coincide with a common index.

2. Make no changes to the existing agreement.

I FISCAL IMP ACT

Modifying the reimbursement agreement may require a longer time period for the City to receive its full reimbursement, on the other hand, if the interest it accumulating at such a rapid rate that it adds so much additional cost to the development fee's it will be unlikely that the lots will be cost effective to develop. ITEM 8.3 PAGEl 5/6/14 j DISCUSSION and BACKGROUND

HISTORY After the Sanderson subdivision fell apart and the housing market crashed, the development consisted of:

*40 completed lots in unit 1, including 10 each owned by US Acquisition (USA) and Fred Bergstrom (Bergstrom) also known as Northwest Homes. Some of these lots had homes in various stages of construction (none complete). Unit 1 also includes an additional 20 lots owned by the Willms family ("Two Sassy Sisters") (none had any construction).

*30 completed lots in unit 2, all owned by the Willms family (none with any construction).

In sum, 10 lots owned by USA, 10 lots owned by Bergstrom, 50 lots owned by the Willms family.

When Sandy Sanderson left the project, there was no potable water to the project (a booster pump was needed) and various landscaping and other work was left unfinished. Hank Willms, as primary property owner, was unwilling to advance any funds to complete the work and the two remaining property owners were left with incomplete homes with no water.

After much negotiation, the City, USA (as the lender and successor to Vineyards, Inc), Bergstrom), and Three Seasons Development (Loring) entered into an agreement to complete the improvements. Under the terms of the agreement Three Seasons Development (Buz Loring, a neighboring property owner who would benefit also by the improvements) would construct the water improvements/booster pump and a portion of his costs would be reimbursed by Bergstrom, USA, and the City. Then, as units I and II continued to develop Bergstrom and USA were reimbursed for their contributions. There is no provision for the City to be reimbursed for its contribution to the booster pump (other than through the improvement bond, see below).

The booster pump and related work was completed as planned. At the conclusion of construction, Bergstrom and USA had each advanced $164,296 and, under the terms of the agreement, this is the amount they were then owed.

They are to be reimbursed this amount in three ways: 1. Landscape/construction bond 2. Building permit credits 3. Reimbursement from Willms lots as they developed

1. Landscape/improvement bond proceeds: The Vineyards project was required to bond for some of the improvements. The bond was collected and total proceeds of $341,186.19 (net of legal fees) were collected. These funds were used to construct various landscape improvements that were left incomplete and to reimburse the City for the landscape project funds it had previously advanced. After completion of the landscape projects, the balance of the bond proceeds was split three ways between the City, Bergstrom and USA to ITEM 8.3 PAGE2 5/6/14 reimburse them for booster pump costs. After this was complete, Bergstrom and USA each received $43,938.96, leaving the amount they were owed at $120,357.04 each. This matter has since been completed and is now paid.

2. Building permit credits: The reimbursement agreement calls for Bergstrom and USA each to be allowed to pull building permits for homes on their lots without any permit fees until the amounts they are owed are fully reimbursed ("credits").

3. Reimbursement from Willms lots as they develop: These agreements call for a fee (initially $5,700 per lot, increasing 5% each year) to be charged on all Willms ("Two Sassy Sister") lots as they develop. These funds are collected by the City at the time of building permit and forwarded to Bergstrom (Northwest) and USA (successor to Vineyards, Inc.) 50/50.

The Finance Department tracks all these and the amount owed to each of the two homebuilders.

NEW PROPOSAL The current developer of the Vineyards, now Skyview Estates, would like to see the 5% compounding interest removed from the agreement. As you can see from the interest chart below, in the six years since the agreement was signed, the interest has added almost $2,000 to the original reimbursement fee.

Year 4/1/2009 4/1/2010 4/1/2011 4/1/2012 4/1/2013 4/1/2014 4/1/2015

Interest 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%

Current Program $5,700.00 $5,985.00 $6,284.25 $6,598.46 $6,928.39 $7,274.80 $7,638.55

The housing market has continued to be slow in the Skyview development. The developer is concerned that if the reimbursement fee is not adjusted it will price the lots out of the market. The developer also understands that the City needs to be repaid, so he is suggesting that we increase the number of lots that participate in the agreement, thus lowering the per lot fee down to $3,000 per lot. This change would add an additional 43 lots to the reimbursement agreement. He is also requesting no interest be assessed on the reimbursement fee.

If the Council chooses to amend the reimbursement agreement, the change will affect only those parcels that have not already been built on. The existing lots that have been sold and built on are not affected by this amendment to the reimbursement agreement as they were compliant with the agreement at the time of development.

ITEM 8.3 PAGE3 5/6/14 POSSIBLE OPTIONS TO CONSIDER:

• Amend the reimbursement agreement to reflect the requested changes o Decrease fee to $3,000 per lot o Remove the annual 5% compounded increase in fee o Add an additional 43 lots to the agreement bringing the total number of lots to 95 • Amend the reimbursement agreement to remove only the 5% compounded annual fee increase and setting the fee to remain at a fixed rate of $5,700 per lot. • Amend the reimbursement agreement to change the 5% compounded annual fee increase to be directly related to the common index thereby changing only when and by the amount the index changes. • Do nothing and leave the reimbursement agreement as it is.

Amending this reimbursement agreement will require recording the amendment since any change will affect the covenants running with the lands for each lot that is included. Should Council direct staff to amend the agreement, the City Manager will work with the City Attorney, and with the Developer Craig Lund, to write up an amendment to the agreement, create a resolution, and bring the matter back to Council for final approval.

IATTACHMENT

1. None.

ITEM 8.3 PAGE4 5/6/14 AGENDA ITEM IMay 6, 2014 City Council Meeting]

To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council

Through: Jeff Kiser, City Manager

From: Juanita Barnett, City Clerk

Date: May 6, 2014

!sUBJECT

Approve a Subrecipient Agreement with the Child Abuse Prevention Council of Shasta CountyI Anderson Partnership for Healthy Children for the administration of the Anderson Teen Center under Grant No. 13-CDBG-8966

I RECOMMENDATION

The City Clerk recommends the City Council:

Adopt a resolution approving a Subrecipient Agreement with the Child Abuse Prevention Council of Shasta CountyI Anderson Partnership for Health Children for administering the Youth Services- Anderson Teen Center portion of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) No. 13-CDBG-8966 and authorizing the City Manager to sign the agreement and any amendments thereto.

IFISCAL IMP ACT

This is grant funded through the new 13-CDBG-8966 grant and will not affect the general fund.

ITEM 8.4 PAGEl 5/6/14 IDISCUSSION and BACKGROUND

In September 2013, the City received notice they were being awarded a grant covering three activities: Direct Homeownership Assistance - Down Payment Assistance, Public Improvements - water/sewer improvements-Ventura Street, and Youth Services - Teen Center. In January, the signed agreement for the grant (13-CDBG-8966) was received and staff has been working with the Housing and Community Development Department (HCD) to get the general condition documentation completed to be able to utilize the funds.

An Update on the Grant No. 13-CDBG-8966:

Housing Assistance - Down Payment Assistance

In March, the Council approved an agreement with Shasta County Housing to administer the Housing Program portion of the grant. This agreement and the general conditions for this portion of the grant are currently under review by HCD and may need to come back to the Council in the future for final review. With the approval of the change to Shasta County Housing for administration of this portion of the grant, the Housing Assistance Guidelines required updating and are scheduled to be brought to the Council for a Public Hearing and approval at the next regular meeting of May 20, 2014.

Public Improvements - Sewer Replacement

The Sewer portion of the grant is still under review and will be brought back to the Council at a future date.

Youth Services - Anderson Teen Center

HCD requires Subrecipient Agreements be reviewed and approved by their department prior to Council approval. Staff has been working with HCD to make sure the Subrecipient Agreement meets their requirements. HCD issued approval for this portion of the grant on April 28th. A copy of their clearance letter is attached as Attachment 2. The next step in this process is to have the Council review and approve the agreement allowing CAPC to begin working on the programs these funds will cover.

A draft of the Subrecipient Agreement is attached as Exhibit A of the proposed resolution for your review.

A brief history:

CAPC has been operating a Teen Center in Anderson since the 1990's. In 2001 the City entered into a lease option agreement with CAPC on the old Masonic Lodge building that was located on the site of the current Anderson Teen Center. However, that building proved to be unsafe and the City began working with Shasta County to put together a plan to build a co-owned building to house both the Teen Center and Shasta County Public Health. ITEM PAGE2 5/6/14 Since the historic downturn in the economy, CAPC has been struggling to maintain funding for the Teen Center and in 2013 approached the City for ideas to help keep their doors open. The City applied for, and received, a grant through CDBG to help promote programs for the Teen Center in an amount of $301,464 with an additional $24,117 in activity delivery funds. Special conditions on this funding require the programs funded from this grant to be used 100% for low income families. Even with this special condition, the additional funds should go a long way in helping to keep programs going at the Teen Center.

The proposed subrecipient agreement meets the conditions of the CDBG grant and allows for the Teen Center to conduct special programs that will directly assist youths from low income families.

If you have questions regarding this matter, please let me know. jATTACHMENT

1. Resolution and proposed Subrecipient Agreement 2. HCD Clearance letter

ITEM PAGE3 5/6/14 ATTACHMENT 1

RESOLUTION NO. 14-_

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANDERSON APPROVING A SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH THE CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL I ANDERSON PARTNERSHIP FOR HEALTHY CHILDREN

WHEREAS, the Child Abuse Prevention Council of Shasta County (CAPC) under the Anderson Partnership for Healthy Children have been operating the Anderson Teen Center in the City of Anderson since the 1990's; and

WHEREAS, the City of Anderson wishes to assist the Teen Center to stay in operation; and

WHEREAS, the City applied for, and was awarded, a Community Development Block Grant (13-CDBG-8966) in the amount of $301,464 for Youth Services with an additional $24,117 for Youth Services Activity Delivery to provide youth service programs at the Anderson Teen Center for low income youths; and

WHEREAS, the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has reviewed and cleared the Youth Services general conditions of Grant No. 13-CDBG-8966 including the Subrecipient Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Anderson does hereby approve the Subrecipient Agreement with the Child Abuse Prevention Council 1 Anderson Partnership for Healthy Children, attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof and authorizes the City Manager to sign the agreement and any amendments thereto. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Anderson this 6th day of May, 2014, by the following vote:

AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:

Debe Hopkins, Mayor

ATTEST:

Juanita Barnett, City Clerk EXHIBIT A SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANDERSON AND THE CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COORDINATING COUNCIL FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE ANDERSON TEEN CENTER

THIS AGREEMENT is entered into on this _ day of 2014, by and between the City of Anderson (herein called the "Grantee") and the Child Abuse Prevention Coordinating Council (herein called the "Subrecipient").

WHEREAS, the Grantee has applied for and received funds from the State of California, Department of Housing and Community Development, State Community Development Block Grant Program ("the Department") originating from the United States Government under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 197 4, as amended (HCD Act), Public Law 93-383; and

WHEREAS, the Grantee wishes to engage the Subrecipient to assist the Grantee in utilizing such funds;

NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed between the parties hereto that:

I. SCOPE OF SERVICE

A. Activities

The Subrecipient will be responsible for administering the Youth Services - Anderson Teen Center portion of Community Development CDBG Grant 13- CDBG-8966 in a manner satisfactory to the Grantee and consistent with any standards required as a condition of providing these funds. Such program will include the following activities eligible under the Community Development Block Grant program:

Program Delivery

Activity #1 Provide a place for youths to gather after school that is not only educational, but a safe social "hangout" that steers youth away from drugs, alcohol and other illegal activities. Provide programs geared 100% to low income recipients who have completed Self-Certification income verification form.

A complete Scope of Services, provided herein and attached hereto as Attachment A, is made a part of this Agreement. General Administration

Provide sufficient staff members to oversee and administer the special programing offered to low-income recipients.

B. National Objectives

All activities funded with CDGB funds must meet one of the CDBG program's National Objectives: benefit low- and moderate-income persons; aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or meet community development needs having a particular urgency, as defined in 24 CFR 570.208.

Per grant Special Conditions, this service (Youth Services) is only eligible under CDBG National Objective of Limited Clientele. All participants of the program are to be low-income eligible, using the State's approved Income Self-Certification Form.

The Subrecipient certifies that the activity(ies) carried out under this Agreement will meet the CDBG National Objective of Limited Clientele. This National Objective will be met by self-certification income verification forms being collected from participants prior to their involvement with programs and activities which are funded by these grant funds.

C. Levels of Accomplishment- Goals and Performance Measures

The Subrecipient agrees to provide the following levels of program services:

Activity Units per Month Total Units/Year

Youth Services (05D) 25 300

[NOTE: one unit ofservice equals one youth or student.]

D. Staffing

Project Director 34.5 hrs wk Project Coordinator 27.5 hours wk Youth Development Specialist 15.5 hrs wk Youth Development Specialist 15.5 hrs wk

E. Performance Monitoring

The Grantee will annually monitor the performance of the Subrecipient against goals and performance standards as stated above to ensure the National Objective is being met and the Subrecipient is using the correct Self­ Certification form. Substandard performance as determined by the Grantee will constitute noncompliance with this Agreement. If action to correct such

Subrecipient Agreement Page 2 substandard performance is not taken by the Subrecipient within a reasonable period of time after being notified by the Grantee, contract suspension or termination procedures will be initiated.

II. TIME OF PERFORMANCE

Services of the Subrecipient shall start on the 7th day of May, 2014 and end on the 30th day of September of 2016. The term of this Agreement and the provisions herein shall be extended to cover any additional time period during which the Subrecipient remains in control of CDBG funds or other CDBG assets.

III. BUDGET Salaries Executive Director 4.8 hrs wk $ 21,999.36 Project Director 34.5 hrs wk 91,179.78 Project Coordinator 27.5 hours wk 43,885.23 Youth Development Specialist 15.5 hrs wk 21,868.08 Youth Development Specialist 15.5 hrs wk 18,916.56

Subtotal Salaries 197,849.01

Fringe 62,555.70 Total Salaries and Fringe 260,404.71 Office Space (Program only) 11,846.00 Utilities Communications 7,482.00 Reproduction/Printing 1,719.00 Supplies and Materials 13,477.00 Mileage 6,115.00 $ Audit Other (Enrichment Consultants) 8,895.00 Other (Staff Training) 9,400.00 Other (Youth Training) 4,800.00 Other (Youth Incentives) 1,443.00 Subtotal Operating 65,177.00 Indirect Costs (Specify)

TOTAL $ 325,581.71

Subrecipient Agreement Page 3 Any indirect costs charged must be consistent with the conditions of Paragraph VIII (C)(2) of this Agreement. In addition, the Grantee may require a more detailed budget breakdown than the one contained herein, and the Subrecipient shall provide such supplementary budget information in a timely fashion in the form and content prescribed by the Grantee. Any amendments to the budget must be approved in writing by both the Grantee and the Subrecipient with Department notification.

IV. PAYMENT

It is expressly agreed and understood that the total amount to be paid by the Grantee under this Agreement shall not exceed $325,581. Drawdowns for the payment of eligible expenses shall be made against the line item budgets specified in Paragraph III herein and in accordance with performance. Expenses for general administration shall also be paid against the line item budgets specified in Paragraph III and in accordance with performance.

Payment shall be based on actual time and material only. Actual time means salary of staff, plus benefits; no profit. Payments may be contingent upon certification of the Subrecipient's financial management system in accordance with the standards specified in 24 CFR 84.21.

V. NOTICES

Notices required by this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered via mail (postage prepaid), commercial courier, or personal delivery or sent by facsimile or other electronic means. Any notice delivered or sent as aforesaid shall be effective on the date of delivery or sending. All notices and other written communications under this Agreement shall be addressed to the individuals in the capacities indicated below, unless otherwise modified by subsequent written notice.

Communication and details concerning this contract shall be directed to the following contract representatives:

Grantee Subrecipient Jeff Kiser, City Manager Rachelle Modena, Deputy Director City of Anderson Child Abuse Prevention Coordinating 1887 Howard Street Council of Shasta County Anderson, CA 96007 2280 Benton Drive, Bldg. C, Suite B Redding, CA 96003 (530) 378-6646 (530) 242-2031 (530) 378-6648- Fax (530) 241-4192 - Fax

Subrecipient Agreement Page 4 VI. SPECIAL CONDITIONS

Youth Services - this service is only eligible under CDBG National Objective of Limited Clientele. The Subrecipient shall ensure that all participants of the program are low-income eligible, using the Department's approved Income Self-Certification Form (Attachment D is a copy of the currently approved Form; however, any Department updates to this Form must be used).

VII. GENERAL CONDITIONS

A. Approval

This Agreement is of no force or effect until signed by both parties and approved by the Department of General Services. Subrecipient may not commence performance until such approval has been obtained.

B. General Compliance

The Subrecipient agrees to comply with all applicable uniform administrative requirements under 24 CFR § 570.502 and 24 CFR §Part 84, and/or Part 85, as applicable.

C. Independent Contractor

Nothing contained in this Agreement is intended to, or shall be construed in any manner, as creating or establishing the relationship of employerI employee between the parties. The Subrecipient shall at all times remain an ~~independent contractor" with respect to the services to be performed under this Agreement. The Grantee shall be exempt from payment of all Unemployment Compensation, FICA, retirement, life and/or medical insurance and Workers' Compensation Insurance, as the Subrecipient is an independent contractor.

D. Hold Harmless

The Subrecipient shall hold harmless, defend and indemnify the Grantee from any and all claims, actions, suits, charges and judgments whatsoever that arise out of the Subrecipient's performance or nonperformance of the services or subject matter called for in this Agreement.

E. Workers' Compensation

The Subrecipient shall provide Workers' Compensation Insurance coverage for all of its employees involved in the performance of this Agreement.

Subrecipient Agreement Page 5 F. Insurance & Bonding

The Subrecipient shall maintain, as required by law, unemployment insurance, disability insurance and liability insurance, which is reasonable to compensate any person, firm, or corporation, who may be injured or damaged by the subrecipient, or any of its subcontractors in performing the grant activity or any part of it.

G. Grantee Recognition

The Subrecipient shall insure recognition of the role of the Grantee in providing services through this Agreement. All activities, facilities and items utilized pursuant to this Agreement shall be prominently labeled as to funding source. In addition, the Subrecipient will include a reference to the support provided herein in all publications made possible with funds made available under this Agreement.

H. Amendments

The Grantee or Subrecipient may amend this Agreement at any time provided that such amendments make specific reference to this Agreement, and are executed in writing, signed by a duly authorized representative of each organization, and approved by the Grantee's governing body, with Department notification. Such amendments shall not invalidate this Agreement, nor relieve or release the Grantee or Subrecipient from its obligations under this Agreement.

The Grantee may, in its discretion, amend this Agreement to conform with Federal, state or local governmental guidelines, policies and available funding amounts, or for other reasons. If such amendments result in a change in the funding, the scope of services, or schedule of the activities to be undertaken as part of this Agreement, such modifications will be incorporated only by written amendment signed by both Grantee and Subrecipient, with Department notification.

I. Suspension or Termination

In accordance with 24 CFR 85.43, the Grantee may suspend or terminate this Agreement if the Subrecipient materially fails to comply with any terms of this Agreement, which include (but are not limited to) the following:

1. Failure to comply with any of the rules, regulations or provisions referred to herein, or such statutes, regulations, executive orders, and HUD guidelines, policies or directives as may become applicable at any time;

2. Failure, for any reason, of the Subrecipient to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement;

Subrecipient Agreement Page 6 3. Ineffective or improper use of funds provided under this Agreement; or

4. Submission by the Subrecipient to the Grantee reports that are incorrect or incomplete in any material respect.

In accordance with 24 CFR 85.44, this Agreement may also be terminated for convenience by either the Grantee or the Subrecipient, in whole or in part, by setting forth the reasons for such termination, the effective date, and, in the case of partial termination, the portion to be terminated. However, if in the case of a partial termination, the Grantee determines that the remaining portion of the award will not accomplish the purpose for which the award was made, the Grantee may terminate the award in its entirety.

VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS

A. Financial Management

1. Accounting Standards

The Subrecipient agrees to comply with 24 CFR 84.21-28 and agrees to adhere to the accounting principles and procedures required therein, utilize adequate internal controls, and maintain necessary source documentation for all costs incurred.

2. Cost Principles

The Subrecipient shall administer its program in conformance with OMB Circulars A-122, "Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations," or A-21, "Cost Principles for Educational Institutions," as applicable. These principles shall be applied for all costs incurred whether charged on a direct or indirect basis.

B. Documentation and Record Keeping

1. Records to be Maintained

The Subrecipient shall maintain all records required by the Federal regulations specified in 24 CFR 570.506, that are pertinent to the activities to be funded under this Agreement. Such records shall include but not be limited to:

a) Records providing a full description of each activity undertaken; b) Records demonstrating that each activity undertaken meets one ofthe National Objectives of the CDBG program; c) Records required to determine the eligibility of activities;

Subrecipient Agreement Page 7 d) Records required to document the acquisition, improvement, use or disposition of real property acquired or improved with CDBG assistance; e) Records documenting compliance with the fair housing and equal opportunity components of the CDBG program; f) Financial records as required by 24 CFR 570.502, and 24 CFR 84.21-28; and g) Other records necessary to document compliance with Subpart K of 24 CFR Part 570.

C. Recycling Certification

The Subrecipient shall certify in writing under penalty of perjury, the minimum, if not exact, percentage of post-consumer material as defined in the Public Contract Code Section 12200, in products, materials, goods, or supplies offered or sold to the State regardless of whether the product meets the requirements of Public Contract Code Section 12209. With respect to printer or duplication cartridges that comply with the requirements of Section 12156(e), the certification required by this subdivision shall specify that the cartridges so comply (Pub. Contract Code §12205).

D. Retention

The Subrecipient must transfer all original CDBG Program related records to the Grantee within 30 days after termination of this Agreement. The Subrecipient shall retain copies of all books, records, accounts, documentation, and all other materials relevant to this Agreement for a minimum period of five (5) years after HCD notifies the Grantee that the HUD/HCD contract has been closed. The retention period begins on the date ofthe submission ofthe Grantee's annual performance and evaluation report to HUD in which the activities assisted under the Agreement are reported on for the final time. Notwithstanding the above, if there is litigation, claims, audits, negotiations or other actions that involve any of the records cited and that have started before the expiration of the five-year period, then such records must be retained until completion of the actions and resolution of all issues, or the expiration of the five-year period, whichever occurs later.

E. Client Data

The Subrecipient shall maintain client data demonstrating client eligibility for services provided. Such data shall include, but not be limited to, client name, address, income level or other basis for determining eligibility, and description of service provided. The Subrecipient shall use the Department's approved Income Self-Certification Form (Attachment D is a copy of the currently approved Form; however, any Department updates to this Form must be used). Such information shall be made available to Grantee monitors or their designees for review upon request.

Subrecipient Agreement Page 8 F. Disclosure

The Subrecipient understands that client information collected under this contract is private and the use or disclosure of such information, when not directly connected with the administration of the Grantee's or Subrecipient's responsibilities with respect to services provided under this contract, is prohibited by State and Federal law, unless written consent is obtained from such person receiving service and, in the case of a minor, that of a responsible parent/guardian.

G. Closeouts

The Subrecipient's obligation to the Grantee shall not end until all closeout requirements are completed. Activities during this close-out period shall include, but are not limited to: making final payments, disposing of program assets (including the return of all unused materials, equipment, unspent cash advances, program income balances, and accounts receivable to the Grantee), and determining the custodianship of records. Not withstanding the foregoing, the terms of this Agreement shall remain in effect during any period that the Subrecipient has control over CDBG funds, including program income. Subrecipient must transfer all CDBG Program related records to the Grantee within 30 days after termination of this Agreement.

H. Audits & Inspections

Subrecipient shall permit the State, Federal government, the Bureau of State Audits, the Department and/or their representatives, upon reasonable notice, unrestricted access to any or all books, records, accounts, documentation, and all other materials relevant to the agreement for the purpose of monitoring, auditing, or otherwise examining said materials.

All Subrecipient records with respect to any matters covered by this Agreement shall be made available to the Grantee or any of their authorized representatives, at any time during normal business hours, as often as deemed necessary, to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts of all relevant data. Any deficiencies noted in audit reports must be fully cleared by the Subrecipient within 30 days after receipt by the Subrecipient. Failure of the Subrecipient to comply with the above audit requirements will constitute a violation of this contract and may result in the withholding of future payments. The Subrecipient hereby agrees to have an annual agency audit conducted in accordance with current Grantee policy concerning subrecipient audits and OMB Circular A-133.

Subrecipient Agreement Page 9 I. Reporting and Payment Procedures

1. Program Income - Not applicable to this Agreement.

2. Indirect Costs

If indirect costs are charged, the Subrecipient will develop an indirect cost allocation plan for determining the appropriate Subrecipient's share of administrative costs and shall submit such plan to the Grantee for approval, in a form specified by the Grantee.

3. Payment Procedures

The Grantee will pay to the Subrecipient funds available under this Agreement based upon information submitted by the Subrecipient and consistent with any approved budget and Grantee policy concerning payments. Payments will be made for eligible expenses actually incurred by the Subrecipient, and not to exceed actual cash requirements. In addition, the Grantee reserves the right to liquidate funds available under this contract for costs incurred by the Grantee on behalf of the Subrecipient.

4. Progress Reports

The Subrecipient shall submit regular Progress Reports to the Grantee in the form, content, and frequency as required by the Grantee.

J. Procurement

1. Compliance

The Subrecipient shall comply with current Grantee policy concerning the purchase of equipment and shall maintain inventory records of all non-expendable personal property as defined by such policy as may be procured with funds provided herein. All program assets (unexpended program income, property, equipment, etc.) shall revert to the Grantee upon termination of this Agreement.

2. OMB Standards

Unless specified otherwise within this agreement, the Subrecipient shall procure all materials, property, or services in accordance with the requirements of 24 CFR 84.40-48.

Subrecipient Agreement Page 10 3. Travel

The Subrecipient shall obtain written approval from the Grantee for any travel outside the metropolitan area with funds provided under this Agreement.

K. Use and Reversion of Assets

The use and disposition of real property and equipment under this Agreement shall be in compliance with the requirements of 24 CFR Part 84 and 24 CFR 570.502, 570.503, and 570.504, as applicable, which include but are not limited to the following:

1. The Subrecipient shall transfer to the Grantee any CDBG funds on hand and any accounts receivable attributable to the use of funds under this Agreement at the time of expiration, cancellation, or termination.

2. Real property under the Subrecipient's control that was acquired or improved, in whole or in part, with funds under this Agreement in excess of $25,000 shall be used to meet one of the CDBG National Objectives pursuant to 24 CFR 570.208 until five (5) years after expiration of this Agreement [or such longer period of time as the Grantee deems appropriate]. If the Subrecipient fails to use CDBG­ assisted real property in a manner that meets a CDBG National Objective for the prescribed period of time, the Subrecipient shall pay the Grantee an amount equal to the current fair market value of the property less any portion of the value attributable to expenditures of non-CDBG funds for acquisition of, or improvement to, the property. Such payment shall constitute program income to the Grantee. The Subrecipient may retain real property acquired or improved under this Agreement after the expiration of the five-year period [or such longer period of time as the Grantee deems appropriate].

3. In all cases in which equipment acquired, in whole or in part, with funds under this Agreement is sold, the proceeds shall be program income (prorated to reflect the extent to that funds received under this Agreement were used to acquire the equipment) and monies must be transferred to the Grantee. Equipment not needed by the Subrecipient for activities under this Agreement shall be (a) transferred to the Grantee for the CDBG program or (b) retained after compensating the Grantee [an amount equal to the current fair market value of the equipment less the percentage of non-CDBG funds used to acquire the equipment].

Subrecipient Agreement Page 11 IX. PERSONNEL & PARTICIPANT CONDITIONS

A. Civil Rights

1. Compliance

The Subrecipient agrees to comply with [fill in local and state civil rights ordinances here] and with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended, Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 as amended, Section 104(b) and Section 109 of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 as amended, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, Executive Order 11063, and Executive Order 11246 as amended by Executive Orders 11375, 11478, 12107 and 12086.

2. Nondiscrimination

During the performance of this Agreement, Subrecipient and its subcontractors shall not unlawfully discriminate, harass, or allow harassment against any employee or applicant for employment because of sex, race, color, ancestry, religious creed, national origin, physical disability (including HIV and AIDS), mental disability, medical condition (e.g., cancer), age (over 40), marital status, and denial of family care leave. Subrecipient and its subcontractors shall insure that the evaluation and treatment of their employees and applicants for employment are free from such discrimination and harassment. Subrecipient and its subcontractors shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code §12990 (a-f) et seq.) and the applicable regulations promulgated thereunder (California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 7285 et seq.). The applicable regulations of the Fair Employment and Housing Commission implementing Government Code Section 12990 (a-f), set forth in Chapter 5 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the California Code of Regulations, are incorporated into this Agreement by reference and made a part hereof as if set forth in full. Subrecipient and its subcontractors shall give written notice of their obligations under this clause to labor organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or other Agreement.

Subrecipient shall include the nondiscrimination and compliance provisions of this clause in all subcontracts to perform work under the agreement.

3. Land Covenants

This contract is subject to the requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P. L. 88-352) and 24 CFR 570.601 and 570.602. In regard to the sale, lease, or other transfer of land acquired, cleared or Subrecipient Agreement Page 12 improved with assistance provided under this contract, the Subrecipient shall cause or require a covenant running with the land to be inserted in the deed or lease for such transfer, prohibiting discrimination as herein defined, in the sale, lease or rental, or in the use or occupancy of such land, or in any improvements erected or to be erected thereon, providing that the Grantee and the United States are beneficiaries of and entitled to enforce such covenants. The Subrecipient, in undertaking its obligation to carry out the program assisted hereunder, agrees to take such measures as are necessary to enforce such covenant, and will not itself so discriminate.

4. Section 504

The Subrecipient agrees to comply with all Federal regulations issued pursuant to compliance with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794), which prohibits discrimination against the individuals with disabilities or handicaps in any Federally assisted program. The Grantee shall provide the Subrecipient with any guidelines necessary for compliance with that portion of the regulations in force during the term of this Agreement.

B. Affirmative Action

1. Approved Plan

The Subrecipient agrees that it shall be committed to carry out pursuant to the Grantee's specifications an Affirmative Action Program in keeping with the principles as provided in President's Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1966. The Grantee shall provide Affirmative Action guidelines to the Subrecipient to assist in the formulation of such program. The Subrecipient shall submit a plan for an Affirmative Action Program for approval prior to the award of funds.

2. Women- and Minority-Owned Businesses (W /MBE)

The Subrecipient will use its best efforts to afford small businesses, minority business enterprises, and women's business enterprises the maximum practicable opportunity to participate in the performance of this contract. As used in this contract, the terms "small business" means a business that meets the criteria set forth in section 3(a) ofthe Small Business Act, as amended (15 U.S.C. 632), and "minority and women's business enterprise" means a business at least fifty-one (51) percent owned and controlled by minority group members or women. For the purpose of this definition, "minority group members" are Afro-Americans, Spanish-speaking, Spanish surnamed or Spanish­ heritage Americans, Asian-Americans, and American Indians. The Subrecipient may rely on written representations by businesses

Subrecipient Agreement Page 13 regarding their status as minority and female business enterprises in lieu of an independent investigation.

3. Access to Records

The Subrecipient shall furnish and cause each of its own subrecipients or subcontractors to furnish all information and reports required hereunder and will permit access to its books, records and accounts by the Grantee, HUD or its agent, or other authorized Federal officials for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with the rules, regulations and provisions stated herein.

4. Notifications

The Subrecipient will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which it has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice, to be provided by the agency contracting officer, advising the labor union or worker's representative of the Subrecipient's commitments hereunder, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment.

5. Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action (EEO /AA) Statement

The Subrecipient will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Subrecipient, state that it is an Equal Opportunity or Affirmative Action employer. Additional State of California Requirements regarding the State Equal Opportunity provisions are contained in Attachments B and C.

6. Subcontract Provisions

The Subrecipient will include the provisions of Paragraphs X.A, Civil Rights, and B, Affirmative Action, in every subcontract or purchase order, specifically or by reference, so that such provisions will be bind~ng upon each of its own subrecipients or subcontractors.

C. Employment Restrictions

1. Prohibited Activity

The Subrecipient is prohibited from using funds provided herein or personnel employed in the administration of the program for: political activities; inherently religious activities; lobbying; political patronage; and nepotism activities.

Subrecipient Agreement Page 14 2. Labor Standards

The Subrecipient agrees to comply with the requirements of the Secretary of Labor in accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act as amended, the provisions of Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 327 et seq.) and all other applicable Federal, state and local laws and regulations pertaining to labor standards insofar as those acts apply to the performance of this Agreement. The Subrecipient agrees to comply with the Copeland Anti-Kick Back Act (18 U.S.C. 874 et seq.) and its implementing regulations of the U.S. Department of Labor at 29 CFR Part 5. The Subrecipient shall maintain documentation that demonstrates compliance with hour and wage requirements of this part. Such documentation shall be made available to the Grantee for review upon request.

The Subrecipient agrees that, except with respect to the rehabilitation or construction of residential property containing less than eight (8) units, all contractors engaged under contracts in excess of $2,000.00 for construction, renovation or repair work financed in whole or in part with assistance provided under this contract, shall comply with Federal requirements adopted by the Grantee pertaining to such contracts and with the applicable requirements of the regulations of the Department of Labor, under 29 CFR Parts 1, 3, 5 and 7 governing the payment of wages and ratio of apprentices and trainees to journey workers; provided that, if wage rates higher than those required under the regulations are imposed by state or local law, nothing hereunder is intended to relieve the Subrecipient of its obligation, if any, to require payment of the higher wage. The Subrecipient shall cause or require to be inserted in full, in all such contracts subject to such regulations, provisions meeting the requirements of this paragraph.

"Section 3" Clause

a) Compliance: Compliance with the provisions of Section 3 of the HUD Act of 1968, as amended, and as implemented by the regulations set forth in 24 CFR 135, and all applicable rules and orders issued hereunder prior to the execution of this contract, shall be a condition of the Federal financial assistance provided under this contract and binding upon the Grantee, the Subrecipient and any of the Subrecipient's subrecipients and subcontractors. Failure to fulfill these requirements shall subject the Grantee, the Subrecipient and any of the Subrecipient's subrecipients and subcontractors, their successors and assigns, to those sanctions specified by the Agreement through which Federal assistance is provided. The Subrecipient certifies and agrees that no contractual or other disability exists that would prevent compliance with these requirements. Subrecipient Agreement Page 15 The Subrecipient further agrees to comply with these "Section 3" requirements and to include the following language in all subcontracts executed under this Agreement:

"The work to be performed under this Agreement is a project assisted under a program providing direct Federal financial assistance from HUD and is subject to the requirements of Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended (12 U.S.C. 1701). Section 3 requires that to the greatest extent feasible opportunities for training and employment be given to low- and very low­ income residents of the project area, and that contracts for work in connection with the project be awarded to business concerns that provide economic opportunities for low- and very low­ income persons residing in the metropolitan area in which the project is located."

The Subrecipient further agrees to ensure that opportunities for training and employment arising in connection with a housing rehabilitation (including reduction and abatement of lead-based paint hazards), housing construction, or other public construction project are given to low- and very low­ income persons residing within the metropolitan area in which the CDBG-funded project is located; where feasible, priority should be given to low- and very low-income persons within the service area of the project or the neighborhood in which the project is located, and to low- and very low-income participants in other HUD programs; and award contracts for work undertaken in connection with a housing rehabilitation (including reduction and abatement of lead-based paint hazards), housing construction, or other public construction project to business concerns that provide economic opportunities for low- and very low-income persons residing within the metropolitan area in which the CDBG-funded project is located; where feasible, priority should be given to business concerns that provide economic opportunities to low­ and very low-income residents within the service area or the neighborhood in which the project is located, and to low- and very low-income participants in other HUD programs.

The Subrecipient certifies and agrees that no contractual or other legal incapacity exists that would prevent compliance with these requirements.

Subrecipient Agreement Page 16 b) Notifications: The Subrecipient agrees to send to each labor organization or representative of workers with which it has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, if any, a notice advising said labor organization or worker's representative of its commitments under this Section 3 clause and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment or training.

c) Subcontracts: The Subrecipient will include this Section 3 clause in every subcontract and will take appropriate action pursuant to the subcontract upon a finding that the subcontractor is in violation of regulations issued by the grantor agency. The Subrecipient will not subcontract with any entity where it has notice or knowledge that the latter has been found in violation of regulations under 24 CFR Part 135 and will not let any subcontract unless the entity has first provided it with a preliminary statement of ability to comply with the requirements of these regulations.

D. Conduct

1. Assignability

The Subrecipient shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the Grantee thereto; provided, however, that claims for money due or to become due to the Subrecipient from the Grantee under this contract may be assigned to a bank, trust company, or other financial institution without such approval. Notice of any such assignment or transfer shall be furnished promptly to the Grantee.

2. Subcontracts

a) Approvals: The Subrecipient shall not enter into any subcontracts with any agency or individual in the performance of this contract without the written consent of the Grantee prior to the execution of such agreement.

b) Monitoring: The Subrecipient will monitor all subcontracted services on a regular basis to assure contract compliance. Results of monitoring efforts shall be summarized in written reports and supported with documented evidence of follow-up actions taken to correct areas of noncompliance.

c) Content: The Subrecipient shall cause all of the provisions of this contract in its entirety to be included in and made a part of any subcontract executed in the performance of this Agreement.

Subrecipient Agreement Page 17 d) Selection Process: The Subrecipient shall undertake to insure that all subcontracts let in the performance of this Agreement shall be awarded on a fair and open competition basis in accordance with applicable procurement requirements. Executed copies of all subcontracts shall be forwarded to the Grantee along with documentation concerning the selection process.

3. Hatch Act

The Subrecipient agrees that no funds provided, nor personnel employed under this Agreement, shall be in any way or to any extent engaged in the conduct of political activities in violation of Chapter 15 of Title V of the U.S. C.

4. Conflict of Interest

The Subrecipient agrees to abide by the provisions of 24 CFR 84.42 and 5 70.611, which include (but are not limited to) the following:

a) The Subrecipient shall maintain a written code or standards of conduct that shall govern the performance of its officers, employees or agents engaged in the award and administration of contracts supported by Federal funds.

b) No employee, officer or agent of the Subrecipient shall participate in the selection, or in the award, or administration of, a contract supported by Federal funds if a conflict of interest, real or apparent, would be involved.

c) No covered persons who exercise or have exercised any functions or responsibilities with respect to CDBG-assisted activities, or who are in a position to participate in a decision­ making process or gain inside information with regard to such activities, may obtain a financial interest in any contract, or have a financial interest in any contract, subcontract, or agreement with respect to the CDBG-assisted activity, or with respect to the proceeds from the CDBG-assisted activity, either for themselves or those with whom they have business or immediate family ties, during their tenure or for a period of one (1) year thereafter. For purposes of this paragraph, a "covered person" includes any person who is an employee, agent, consultant, officer, or elected or appointed official of the Grantee, the Subrecipient, or any designated public agency.

Subrecipient Agreement Page 18 5. Lobbying

The Subrecipient hereby certifies that:

a) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement;

b) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions; and

c) It will require that the language of paragraph (d) of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all Subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly:

d) Lobbying Certification

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S.C. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

6. Copyright

If this contract results in any copyrightable material or inventions, the Grantee and/or grantor agency reserves the right to royalty-free, non­ exclusive and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use and to authorize others to use, the work or materials for governmental purposes.

Subrecipient Agreement Page 19 7. Religious Activities

The Subrecipient agrees that funds provided under this Agreement will not be utilized for inherently religious activities prohibited by 24 CFR 570.200(j), such as worship, religious instruction, or proselytization.

X. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS

A. Air and Water

The Subrecipient agrees to comply with the following requirements insofar as they apply to the performance of this Agreement:

• Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C., 7401, et seq.;

• Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C., 1251, et seq., as amended, 1318 relating to inspection, monitoring, entry, reports, and information, as well as other requirements specified in said Section 114 and Section 308, and all regulations and guidelines issued thereunder;

• Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations pursuant to 40 CFR Part 50, as amended.

B. Flood Disaster Protection

In accordance with the requirements of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 ( 42 U.S. C. 4001), the Subrecipient shall assure that for activities located in an area identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as having special flood hazards, flood insurance under the National Flood Insurance Program is obtained and maintained as a condition of financial assistance for acquisition or construction purposes (including rehabilitation).

C. Lead-Based Paint

The Subrecipient agrees that any construction or rehabilitation of residential structures with assistance provided under this Agreement shall be subject to HUD Lead-Based Paint Regulations at 24 CFR 570.608, and 24 CFR Part 35, Subpart B. Such regulations pertain to all CDBG-assisted housing and require that all owners, prospective owners, and tenants of properties constructed prior to 1978 be properly notified that such properties may include lead­ based paint. Such notification shall point out the hazards of lead-based paint and explain the symptoms, treatment and precautions that should be taken when dealing with lead-based paint poisoning and the advisability and availability of blood lead level screening for children under seven. The notice should also point out that if lead-based paint is found on the property, abatement measures may be undertaken. The regulations further require Subrecipient Agreement Page 20 that, depending on the amount of Federal funds applied to a property, paint testing, risk assessment, treatment and/ or abatement may be conducted.

0. Historic Preservation

The Subrecipient agrees to comply with the Historic Preservation requirements set forth in the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S. C. 4 70) and the procedures set forth in 36 CFR Part 800, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation Procedures for Protection of Historic Properties, insofar as they apply to the performance of this agreement.

In general, this requires concurrence from the State Historic Preservation Officer for all rehabilitation and demolition of historic properties that are fifty years old or older or that are included on a Federal, state, or local historic property list.

XI. SEVERABILITY

If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, the remainder of the Agreement shall not be affected there by and all other parts of this Agreement shall nevertheless be in full force and effect.

XII. SECTION HEADINGS AND SUBHEADINGS

The section headings and subheadings contained in this Agreement are included for convenience only and shall not limit or otherwise affect the terms of this Agreement.

XIII. WAIVER

The Grantee's failure to act with respect to a breach by the Subrecipient does not waive its right to act with respect to subsequent or similar breaches. The failure of the Grantee to exercise or enforce any right or provision shall not constitute a waiver of such right or provision.

XIV. ENTIRE AGREEMENT

This Agreement and Attachments A-D constitute the entire agreement between the Grantee and the Subrecipient for the use of funds received under this Agreement and it supersedes all prior or contemporaneous communications and proposals, whether electronic, oral, or written between the Grantee and the Subrecipient with respect to this Agreement.

{NOTE: For the above sections, if the Subrecipient is a governmental or quasi­ governmental agency the applicable sections of 24 CFR Part 85, /{Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments," and OMB Circular A-87would apply.]

Subrecipient Agreement Page 21 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this contract as of the date first written above.

City of Anderson Child Abuse Prevention Coordinating Council

By ______By ______Jeff Kiser, City Manager Rachelle Modena, Deputy Director

Date______Date ______

Attest

Juanita Barnett, City Clerk

Countersigned:

By ______By ______Liz Cottrell, Finance Officer Title______

Fed. I. D. ______

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY:

Ann Siprelle, City Attorney

Subrecipient Agreement Page 22 ATTACHMENT A PUBLIC SERVICE ACTIVITIES

SCOPE OF SERVICES

A. Principal Tasks

The Subrecipient will be responsible for providing youth services to eligible children over the period of May 7. 2014 to September 30. 2016. With funding from the Year 2013 CDBG program of the City of Anderson, the Subrecipient will make available the equivalent of 300 low-income youths per year. The youth services will be provided at the Subrecipient's main youth center (Anderson Teen Center) at 2889 East Center Street, Anderson, California. The Subrecipient will administer all tasks in the provision of the aforementioned public services in compliance with all applicable Federal, state, and local rules and regulations governing these funds, and in a manner satisfactory to the Grantee.

Changes in the scope of services, budget, or method of compensation contained in this Agreement, unless otherwise noted, may only be made through a written amendment to this Agreement, executed by the Subrecipient and Grantee.

The major tasks that the Subrecipient will perform in connection with the provision of the eligible day care services include, but are not limited to, the following:

1) Maintain facilities at all times in conformance with all applicable codes, licensing, and other requirements for the operation of a youth services center. This will include all requirements for lead-based paint testing and abatement, as necessary. The facilities must also be handicapped accessible.

2) Conduct outreach through flyers, public service announcements, networking with local agencies, scheduling of open houses and other means to inform the low- and moderate-income community of the availability of the fully-subsidized youth services available, and to ensure sufficient demand to maintain enrollment. All descriptions of the program will emphasize that the center is handicapped-accessible.

3) Accept applications and perform eligibility determinations using the Department's approved Income Self-Certification Form (Attachment D is a copy of the currently approved Form; however, any Department updates to this Form must be used). Only youths age 12 to 17 years from families in the City of Anderson with incomes that do not exceed the low-income limits of the CDBG program, by family size, will be eligible for enrollment in the subsidized youth services activities.

4) Offer youth services from 3:00 p. m. to 6:00 p. m. Monday through Friday during the school year and 2:00p.m. to 7:00p.m. in the summer to approved eligible youth.

Subrecipient Agreement Page 23 5) Ensure that the background and qualifications of the Subrecipient's staff and volunteers providing the on-site youth services at all times are appropriate for the enrolled youth population at the center by clearing them through a fingerprint and background check

6) Provide nutritionally balanced snack daily.

7) As part of the youth services, provide a range of structured social, educational, and cultural enrichment activities appropriate to the age group being served.

8) Offer Targeted Case Management to youth who qualify.

9) Maintain program and financial records documenting the eligibility, attendance, provision of services, and Subrecipient expenses relative to the individuals receiving youth services as a result of assistance provided through the CDBG program.

B. Budget and Method of Compensation

With the submission of original monthly bills together with proper support documentation, for the services described in Section A. of this Agreement, the Subrecipient will be reimbursed on a monthly basis according to the following schedule:

For youth services: A pro rata share of the Subrecipient's allowable monthly expenses for the provision of youth services, in accordance with OMB Circular A-122 and the Department of Health and Human Services Publication OASMB-5, with aggregate monthly billings limited to $12,500.00.

Subrecipient Agreement Page 24 ATTACHMENT 2 STATE OF CAliFORNIA ·BUSINESS CONSUMER SERVICES AND HOUSING AGENCY EDMl)ND G BROWN .18 Governor DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program 2020 West El Camino Avenue, Suite 500 (95833) P. 0. Box 952054 Sacramento, CA 94252-2054 (855) 333·CDBG FAX (916) 263·2762 wv.w.hc

April 28, 2014

Mr. Jeff Kiser, City Manager City of Anderson 1887 Howard Street Anderson, CA 96007

Re: Grant 13-CDBG-8966 • Clearance of Special Conditions and Authorization to Incur Costs- Youth Services Activity- Anderson Teen Center (050)

Dear Mr. Kiser:

The Department of Housing and Community Development (Department) is in receipt of the City of Anderson's (City) request for clearance of Special Conditions and authorization to incur costs and draw down grant funds for the Youth Services Activity- Anderson Teen Center, contained in the above referenced Grant.

The Special Conditions documents for the Youth Services Activity are:

• Exhibit E Special Conditions • Environmental Compliance • Site Control • Funding Commitments • Procurement • Code Enforcement

All required documents pertaining to the above request have been received and are acceptable. Therefore, the City's request to incur costs and draw down grant funds for the above stated ar.tivity in grant 13-CDBG-8966, is approved as of the date of this letter.

If you have any questions, please contact Program Representative Melisa Adams at (916) 263-1656 or via email at melisa.adams@ hcd.ca.gov.

Sincerely,

Karen Patterson CDBG Program Manager

cc: Juanita Barnett, City Clerk, City of Anderson AGENDA ITEM

!May 6, 2014, City Council Meetin~

Approved for Submittal By:

To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council

Through: Jeff Kiser, City Manager Telephone 378-6646

From: Kristen Maze , Development Services Director Telephone 378-6636

Date: May 6, 2014

!sUBJECT

Approve a Professional Services Agreement for the Anderson River Park Master Plan Update and amend Parks Capital Improvement Fund 110 budget line item for the Master Plan Update

I RECOMMENDATION

The Development Services Director recommends that the City Council:

1. Approve a professional services agreement with Foothill Associates of Rocklin, California in an amount of $49,900 to update the Anderson River Park Master Plan and authorize the City Manager to sign the agreement and any amendments thereto; and

2. Adopt a resolution authorizing the Finance Director to amend the 2013/2014 budget.

IFISCAL IMPACT The Parks Capital Improvement Fund 110 will need to be amended to add a $50,000 line item to projects for the proposed Anderson River Park Master Plan Update based on the proposed bids. ITEM 8.7a PAGEl 5/6/14 IDISCUSSION and BACKGROUND

On March 21, 2014, the City of Anderson awarded the proposal to prepare the Anderson River Master Plan Update to Foothill Associates in the amount $49,900. Foothill Associates is located in Rocklin, California, they are a well-qualified company with substantial experience working with small rural communities and have a great deal of experience in recreation and land use planning, environmental regulation, arborist, community engagement and CEQA document preparation.

On February 24, 2014, Requests for Proposals (RFPs) were issued for this project to nine consultants. On March 17, 2014, the deadline for proposals, the City received two proposals, one from Melton Design and the other from Foothill Associates.

The Development Services Director, Engineering Services Manager and City Clerk reviewed the proposals for: 1) Capacity to Perform the Scope of Work ( 40%), 2) Experience (30%), 3) Ability to Perform on Time (20%), and 4) Price for Services (10%).

Of the two proposals submitted, the proposal from Foothill Associates scored the highest overall. Foothill presented a comprehensive and professional proposal.

Staff is confident that Foothill Associates will be able to provide the City with a quality product in a timely manner.

IATTACHMENT

1. Proposed Agreement 2. Resolution amending budget

ITEM 8.7a PAGE2 5/6/14 ATTACHMENT 1

CITY OF ANDERSON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR ANDERSON RIVER PARK MASTER PLAN UPDATE

This Agreement is entered into this 9 day of May, 2014, by and between the City of Anderson, a California municipal corporation ("City"), and Foothill Associates ("Consultant").

I. RECITALS

A. Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the prov1s10n of professional the Anderson River Parks Master Plan Update consultant services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

B. Consultant has presented a proposal for such services to the City, dated March 17, 2014, (attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A") and is duly licensed, qualified and experienced to perform those services

C. Consultant agrees it has satisfied itself by its own investigation and research regarding the conditions affecting the work to be done and labor and materials needed, and that its decision to execute this Agreement is based on such independent investigation and research.

D. City desires to engage Consultant to render such services as set forth in this Agreement.

II. AGREEMENT

1. Scope of Services.

1.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the necessary professional Parks Master Plan Update consultant services ("Services"). The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit "A."

2. Schedule of Services.

2.1 Schedule of Services. The Services of Consultant are to commence upon execution of this Agreement by the City and shall be undertaken and completed in a prompt and timely manner, pursuant to the schedule outlined in the Scope of Work, more particularly described in Exhibit "A."

2.2 Extension of Time. Consultant may, for good cause, request extensions of time to perform the Services required hereunder. Such extensions shall be authorized in advance by the City in writing and shall be incorporated in written amendments to this Agreement. 3. Fees and Payments.

3.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit "A." The total compensation shall not exceed forty nine thousand, nine hundred dollars ($49,900) without City's prior written approval.

3.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to City a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant. The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. City shall, within forty-five ( 45) days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon.

4. Changes.

4.1 The Parties may, from time to time, request changes in the scope of the Services of Consultant to be performed hereunder. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in the amount of Consultant's compensation and/ or changes in the schedule must be authorized in advance by the City in writing. Mutually agreed changes shall be incorporated in written amendments to the Agreement.

5. Responsibilities of Consultant.

5 .1 Independent Contractor; Control and Payment of Subordinates. Consultant enters into this Agreement as an independent contractor and not as an employee of the City. Consultant shall have no power or authority by this Agreement to bind the City in any respect. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to be inconsistent with this relationship or status. All employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors hired or retained by the Consultant are employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors of the Consultant and not of the City. The City shall not be obligated in any way to pay any wage claims or other claims made against Consultant by any such employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors, or any other person resulting from performance of this Agreement.

5.2 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City.

5.3 Project Manager. The Consultant shall designate a project manager who at all times shall represent the Consultant before the City on all matters relating to this Agreement. The project manager shall continue in such capacity unless and until he or she is removed at the request of the City, is no longer employed by Consultant or replaced with the written approval of the City which shall not be unreasonably withheld.

5.4 Coordination of Services. Consultant agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City staff, consultants and other staff at all reasonable times. City agrees to work closely with Consultant's staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to Consultant's staff at all reasonable times.

82755.00000\6794093. 12 5.5 Warranty. Consultant agrees and represents that it is qualified to properly provide the Services set forth in Exhibit "A" in a manner which is consistent with the generally accepted standards of Consultant's profession. Consultant further represents and agrees that it will perform said Services in a legally adequate manner in conformance with applicable federal, state and local laws and guidelines.

6. Insurance.

6.1 Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence Services under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subconsultant to commence work on any subcontract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that the subconsultant has secured all insurance required under this section.

6.2 Types of Required Coverage. As a condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement for work to be performed hereunder and without limiting the indemnity provisions of the Agreement, the Consultant in partial performance of its obligations under such Agreement, shall procure and maintain in full force and effect during the term of the Agreement, the following policies of insurance.

6.2.1 Commercial General Liability: Commercial General Liability Insurance which affords coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office "occurrence" form CG 0001 , with minimum limits of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence. Defense costs shall be paid in addition to the limits.

The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for ( 1) products and completed operations; (2) contractual liability; (3) third party action over claims; or (4) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another.

6.2.2 Automobile Liability: Automobile Liability Insurance with coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form CA 0001 covering "Any Auto" (Symbol 1) with minimum limits of $1,000,000 each accident.

6.2.3 Workers' Compensation: Workers' Compensation Insurance, as required by the State of California and Employer' s Liability Insurance with a limit of not less than $1 ,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and disease.

6.2.4 Professional Liability: Professional Liability insurance for errors and omissions with minimum limits of$1,000,000. Covered Professional Services shall specifically include all work to be performed under the Agreement.

If coverage is written on a claims-made basis, the retroactive date shall precede the effective date of the initial Agreement and continuous coverage will be maintained or an extended reporting period will be exercised for a period of at least three (3) years from termination or expiration of this Agreement.

82755 00000\6794093 . I3 6.3 Endorsements.

6.3 .1 The policy or policies of insurance required by Sections 6.2.1 Commercial General Liability and 6.2.2 Automobile Liability and shall be endorsed to provide the following:

6.3 .1.1 Additional Insured: The indemnified parties shall be additional insureds with regard to liability and defense of suits or claims arising out of the performance of the Agreement. Additional Insured Endorsements shall not (1) be restricted to "ongoing operations"; (2) exclude "contractual liability"; (3) restrict coverage to "sole" liability of Consultant; or ( 4) contain any other exclusions contrary to the Agreement.

6.3.1.2 Primary Insurance and Non-Contributing Insurance: This insurance shall be primary and any other insurance, deductible, or self-insurance maintained by the indemnified parties shall not contribute with this primary insurance.

6.3 .1.3 Severability: In the event of one insured, whether named or additional, incurs liability to any other of the insureds, whether named or additional, the policy shall cover the insured against whom claim is or may be made in the same manner as if separate policies had been issued to each insured, except that the limits of insurance shall not be increased thereby.

6.3 .1.4 Cancellation: The policy shall not be canceled or the coverage suspended, voided, reduced or allowed to expire until a thirty (30) day prior written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (1 0) days prior written notice shall be allowed for non-payment of premium.

6.3.1.5 Duties: Any failure by the named insured to comply with reporting provisions of the policy or breaches or violations of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the indemnified parties.

6.3.1.6 Applicability: That the coverage provided therein shall apply to the obligations assumed by the Consultant under the indemnity provisions of the Agreement, unless the policy or policies contain a blanket form of contractual liability coverage.

6.3.2 The policy or policies of insurance required by Section 6.2.3 Workers' Compensation shall be endorsed, as follows:

6.3.2.1 Waiver of Subrogation: A waiver of subrogation stating that the insurer waives all rights of subrogation against the indemnified parties.

6.3.2.2 Cancellation: The policy shall not be canceled or the coverage suspended, voided, reduced or allowed to expire until a thirty (30) day prior written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (1 0) days prior written notice shall be allowed for non-payment of premium.

6.3 .3 The policy or policies of insurance required by Section 6.2.4 Professional Liability shall be endorsed, as follows:

82755.00000\6794093. 14 6.3 .3 .1 Cancellation: The policy shall not be canceled or the coverage suspended, voided, reduced or allowed to expire until a thirty (30) day prior written notice of cancellation has been served upon the City except ten (1 0) days prior written notice shall be allowed for non-payment of premium.

6.4 Deductible. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be approved in writing by the City and shall protect the indemnified parties in the same manner and to the same extent as they would have been protected had the policy or policies not contained a deductible or self-insured retention.

6.5 Evidence of Insurance. The Consultant, concurrently with the execution of the Agreement, and as a condition precedent to the effectiveness thereof, shall deliver either certified copies of the required policies, or original certificates and endorsements on forms approved by the City. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the expiration of any such policy, evidence of insurance showing that such insurance coverage has been renewed or extended shall be filed with the City. If such coverage is cancelled or reduced, Consultant shall, within ten (1 0) days after receipt of written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage, file with the City evidence of insurance showing that the required insurance has been reinstated or has been provided through another insurance company or companies.

6.6 Failure to Maintain Coverage. Consultant agrees to suspend and cease all operations hereunder during such period of time if the required insurance coverage is not in effect and evidence of insurance has not been furnished to the City. The City shall have the right to withhold any payment due Consultant until Consultant has fully complied with the insurance provisions of this Agreement.

In the event that the Consultant' s operations are suspended for failure to maintain required insurance coverage, the Consultant shall not be entitled to an extension of time for completion of the Work because of production lost during suspension.

6. 7 Acceptability of Insurers. Each such policy shall be from a company or companies with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A: VII and authorized to do business in the State of California, or otherwise allowed to place insurance through surplus line brokers under applicable provisions of the California Insurance Code or any federal law.

6.8 Insurance for Subconsultants. All subconsultants shall be included as additional insureds under the Consultant's policies, or the Consultant shall be responsible for causing subconsultants to purchase the appropriate insurance in compliance with the terms of this Agreement, including adding the City as an Additional Insured to the subconsultant's policies.

7. Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality.

7.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modifY, reuse or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of

82755.00000\6794093 . 15 expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement ("Documents & Data").

Consultant shall require all subconsultants to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subconsultant prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City.

City shall not be limited in any way in its use or modification of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use or modification not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk.

7.2 Confidentiality. All Documents & Data are confidential and Consultant agrees that they shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the prior written approval of the City, except by court order.

8. Accounting Records.

8.1 Maintenance and Inspection. Consultant shall maintain and make available for inspection by the City and its auditor's accurate records of all its costs, disbursements and receipts with respect to any work under this Agreement. Such inspections may be made during regular office hours at any time until one (1) year after the final payments under this Agreement are made to the Consultant.

9. Subcontracting.

9.1 Prior Approval Required. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement.

10. Termination of Agreement.

10.1 Grounds for Termination. City may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate all or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those Services which have been adequately rendered to City, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause.

10.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this

82755 00000\6794093 !6 Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request.

10.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated.

11. General Provisions.

11.1 Delivery ofNotices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose:

City: City of Anderson 1887 Howard Street Anderson, CA 96007 Attn: Jeff Kiser, City Manager

Consultant:

Foothill Associates 590 Menlo Drive Suite 5 Rocklin, CA 95765 Attn.: Kate Kirsh

Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty­ eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.

11.2 Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of or incident to any alleged acts, omissions, negligence or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, agents, subcontractors and subconsultants arising out of or in connection with the performance of the Services or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all consequential damages and attorneys' fees and other related costs and expenses except such loss or damage which was caused by the active negligence, sole negligence, or willful misconduct ofthe City.

Consultant shall defend, at Consultant's own cost, expense and risk, any and all such aforesaid suits, actions or other legal proceedings of every kind that may be brought or instituted against City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers. Consultant shall pay 82755.00000\6794093. 17 and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers, in any such suit, action or other legal proceeding. Consultant shall reimburse City and its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents and/or volunteers, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided.

Consultant' s obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the City, its directors, officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers.

11.3 Prohibited Interests. Consultant covenants that neither it, nor any of its employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors has any interest, nor shall they acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the subject of the Agreement, nor any other interest which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of the Services hereunder.

11.4 Prevailing Wages. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the Services are subject to the Prevailing Wage Laws, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws.

11 .5 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant shall not engage in unlawful employment discrimination. Such unlawful employment discrimination includes, but is not limited to, employment discrimination based upon a person's race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, gender, citizenship or sexual orientation.

11.6 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3 700 of the California Labor Code which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.

11.7 Attorneys' Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and all other costs of such action.

11.8 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement whether by assignment or novation, without the prior written consent of the City, which will not be unreasonably withheld. Provided, however, that claims for money due or to become due Consultant from the City under this Agreement may be assigned to a financial institution or to a trustee in bankruptcy, without such approval. Notice of any assignment or transfer, whether voluntary or involuntary, shall be furnished promptly to the City.

11.9 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns ofthe Parties.

82755. 00000\6794093 . !8 11.10 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.

11.11 Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Pmiy any contractual rights by custom, estoppel or otherwise.

11.12 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties relative to the Services specified herein. There are no understandings, agreements, conditions, representations, warranties or promises with respect to this Agreement, except those contained in or referred to in the writing.

11.13 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Shasta County.

11.14 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

11.15 Interpretation. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party.

11.16 No Third Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.

11.17 Authority to Enter Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Pmiy.

11.18 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

11.19 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.

82755.00000\6794093. 19 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

CITY OF ANDERSON FOOTHILL ASSOCIATES

By: By: Jeff Kiser Kate Kirsh City Manager Vice President

Attest: Attest:

By: By: Juanita Barnett Ed Armstrong City Clerk

Approved as to Form:

By: Best Best & Krieger LLP City Attorney

82755.00000\6794093 . 110 EXHIBIT " A" CONSULTANT PROPOSAL

82755.00000\6794093.1

March 17, 2014

Kristen Maze, Community Services Director City of Anderson 1887 Howard Street Anderson, CA 96007

Dear Ms. Maze:

Foothill Associates is very pleased to submit our proposal to prepare the Anderson River Park Master Plan Update to the City of Anderson. This interesting project seems a perfect fit for Foothill Associates since it requires exactly the variety of technical capabilities we are able to deliver. With our focus on multi-disciplinary services, we are not a traditional Landscape Architecture firm. We combine strong expertise in all aspects of landscape architecture with expertise in recreation planning, environmental regulation, arborist and natural resources surveys, land planning, computerized mapping, community engagement, and CEQA document preparation.

We have substantial experience working successfully with small rural communities and districts in Northern California. We truly enjoy working with rural communities and understand their unique issues and challenges. We also have a special expertise with parks that combine active and passive uses with natural and cultural resources preservation. In addition, we have substantial experience working with CDFW through all the regulatory work we do, and are very familiar with their mission and organizational structure.

We are confident that Foothill Associates can develop a Master Plan Update that will effectively guide implementation of the proposed projects within your available budget and timeframe. This is a project we would very much like to be a part of. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (916) 435-1202 or via e-mail at [email protected] with any questions about our proposal. We are open to revising our approach if we have misunderstood what you are looking for or if your needs as reflected in the RFP have changed. We are assuming that all deliverables may be provided in electronic format, with the City printing and distributing hard copies to staff and others as needed. However, we can certainly provide hardcopies if you prefer on a time and materials basis.

Thank you for this opportunity to present our proposal for consideration. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Kate Kirsh, RLA Vice President Landscape Architect (CA License #4362)

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... 1 1.1 Project Understanding ...... 1

2 FIRM ORGANIZATION...... 2 2.1 Consultants ...... 2 2.2 Project Team ...... 2 2.3 Firm Profile ...... 10 2.4 Related Project Experience ...... 12 2.5 References ...... 17

3 SCOPE OF WORK...... 18 Task 1: Site Analysis/Assessment...... 18 Task 2: Community Outreach and Participation ...... 18 Task 3: Master Plan ...... 19 Task 4: Fundraising Plan ...... 20 Task 5: Project Specific Website Support and Progress Reports ...... 20 Task 6: California Environmental Quality Act Document Preparation...... 20

4 PROJECT TIMELINE ...... 24

Appendices Appendix A- Additional Staff Resumes

i

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 Project Understanding The Anderson River Park (ARP) is a unique and much loved 440-acre recreation resource enjoyed by residents of the City of Anderson (the City) and the surrounding region. It provides an extensive array of recreation facilities that truly offer ‘something for everyone.’ The park includes sports fields, picnic areas, walking trails, a disc golf course, a pond, Scout Hall, and access to the Sacramento River for fishing and boating. It is the site of community events including the Summer Serenade concert series, Family Fun Fest, Labor Day Bar-b-cue, and multicultural festivals, as well as recreation programs such as summer camp, wellness activities, and nature education.

The City last prepared a master plan for the Anderson River Park in 1983, and now wishes to update that plan to reflect current community needs and recreation trends. The ARP is jointly owned by the City of Anderson and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). While the ARP Master Plan Update should examine and document conditions throughout the entire park area, no changes or new facilities are anticipated on the CDFW owned portion. The ARP Master Plan Update should provide clear direction that can be used to guide future development and use of the park. The Master Plan Update process must provide meaningful engagement opportunities for the community, CDFW, City departments, Parks Commission, and City Council. Input from these stakeholders needs to be compiled and integrated into a vision for the ARP that is realistic and sustainable.

The ARP Master Plan Update should also include an environmental site analysis of ARP and an evaluation of opportunities and constraints that reflects community needs and interests. It should also provide specific recommendations, associated costs, and an implementation strategy.

The City is further requesting that a CEQA environmental document be prepared for the ARP Master Plan Update. The type of CEQA document is anticipated to be an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND). While the only new facilities or renovations are expected to be on the City-owned property, the CEQA document will address the vision for the entire park as described in the ARP Master Plan Update.

Additional project elements associated with the ARP Master Plan Update include development of a funding plan to help implement the recommendations, and providing supporting information for the City’s web site to help keep the community and decision makers informed about the project.

1

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson

2 FIRM ORGANIZATION

2.1 Consultants

Prime Consultant Firm Name: Foothill Associates Address: 590 Menlo Drive, Suite 5, Rocklin, CA 95765 Telephone Number: (916) 435-1202 Contact: Kate Kirsh, [email protected]

Subconsultants Firm Name: Ric Windmiller, Consulting Archaeologist Address: 2280 Grass Valley Highway, Suite 205, Auburn, CA 95603 Telephone Number: (530) 878-0979 2.2 Project Team

2.2.1 Organizational Chart The working relationship and duties of the prime and subconsultants are illustrated in the organizational chart. The proposed Project Team will be available to work on the Project in the roles specified with the proposed timeline and will not be reassigned, removed, or replaced without the consent of the City.

2

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson

2.2.2 Team Member Roles Kate Kirsh, RLA, Vice President and Landscape Architect, will serve as Principal-in-Charge and Project Manager. In this role, Kate will be the City’s first point-of-contact on all matters dealing with the services offered and will handle day-to-day activities through to completion.

Kate has extensive experience managing recreation and open space planning and design projects. She has experience managing numerous projects that involved the simultaneous development of strategic master plans, feasibility studies, policies, environmental analysis, and major public outreach efforts. Ms. Kirsh has an excellent understanding of the practical and fiscal challenges faced by organizations that manage and operate these resources and is also savvy at identifying grant funding options and writing grants. She is also very skilled at writing policy documents to guide future development, as well as successful implementation of projects. As Principal-in-Charge, Ms. Kirsh will be actively contributing to this project and will also ensure that all contractual obligations are met to the satisfaction of the City.

Ed Armstrong, RLA will assist with development of the Master Plan Update, including site assessment, plan graphics, costs estimates, and community engagement.

Kirk Vail will assist with arborist and biological resources surveys as required.

Kyrsten Shields will lead preparation of the CEQA documentation.

Kate Rose and Candice Guider will assist with preparation of the CEQA documentation. Kate will also assist with public outreach. Candice will provide QA/QC for all documents.

Ric Windmiller will provide cultural resource assessment in support of CEQA documentation.

Michael Brewer will prepare maps and graphics in support of public engagement process, master plan document, and CEQA documentation.

Ann Marie Perozzi will provide graphic support for website and presentations during the Community Outreach and Public Participation task.

2.2.3 Resumes Following are resumes for the key team members including related project experience, training, and specializations. Resumes for supporting team members are in Appendix A.

3

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson

Kate Kirsh, RLA Project Manager Principal Landscape Architect/ Recreation Planner

Education Kate Kirsh, Foothill Associates Vice President, specializes in parks, Master of Landscape Architecture, trails, recreation, and opens space planning and design at the University of Oregon, Eugene, 1996 regional, local, and site scales. She has worked on all phases of project planning and design including site assessment, conceptual Bachelor of Landscape Architecture, design, planting plans, grading, construction drawings, University of Oregon, Eugene, 1995 implementation, cost estimating, phasing, community surveys, Bachelor of Arts (Art History), workshop facilitation, and operations and maintenance strategies. University of California at Santa She also has extensive experience with natural resource assessment, Barbara, 1978 watershed management, ecological planning, design and restoration, and the use of computers and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Registrations and Certifications for environmental analysis and characterization. Her experience includes considerable contact with federal, state, and local regulatory California Landscape Architect, License agencies as well as private public interest groups, landowners, and #4362 tribes. In addition, Kate has more than 20 years of experience Certified Arborist #WC-5137Resume designing databases and computer applications to support a wide Lists variety of applications, including parks inventory and maintenance, watershed planning, assessment, restoration project management Affiliations and resource monitoring. American Society of Landscape Architects Representative Experience Sly Park Master Plan and Master EIR. Kate was project manager and Presentations principal author for development of a Master Plan and Master EIR for “Building Multi-jurisdiction Consensus the Sly Park Recreation Area, an approximately 1,600 acre recreation for Regional Trails,” California Trails area in El Dorado County with many miles of equestrian, hiking, and and Greenways Conference, California mountain bike trails; a 650-acre lake; and over 20 different day use State Parks, 2008. Presentation by Kate and overnight campgrounds. Development of the master plan Kirsh and Jill Ritzman included inventory of existing trails and campground conditions; facilitation of a series of public workshops to identify concerns and Experience visions; establishment of goals and objectives consistent with public Foothill Associates, Vice vision; comprehensive design standards; concept plans for over 20 President/Landscape Architect individual projects; analysis of regional recreation trends and potential market for new revenue generation; Forest Management University of Oregon, InfoGraphics Lab, Plan; noise study; traffic study; cultural resources inventory; GIS Project Manager implementation phasing; cost estimates; and Capital Improvement Pacific Basin Shelter Company, GIS Plan. The Master EIR provided environmental analysis for all elements Project Manager of the Master Plan and support for an El Dorado County General Plan Amendment, Rezone, and Special Use Permit. Multiple presentations were made to the County Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission.

Henningsen-Lotus Park Concept Plan, El Dorado County, CA. Kate is serving as Project Manager to prepare a conceptual plan for park improvements. The planning process includes an assessment of site

4

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson opportunities and constraints, coordination of an to include a master conceptual improvement plan for advisory group, web survey, public workshops, adjacent parcels and other recreational uses to economic analysis, cost estimates, and phased complement rafting activities, consistent with utility implementation strategies. Special project regulated river releases. considerations include environmental constraints related to riparian habitat, flooding, wetlands, and Paradise Recreation and Park District Master Plan native oaks; opportunities for acquisition of land for Update (2010). Kate completed an update to the park expansion; conflicting community views regarding District’s Master Plan, which she originally prepared in potential park improvements; and the construction, 2001. She facilitated a public workshop and on-line operations, and maintenance costs versus revenue survey to gather community input on the recreational potential. priorities and interests. The data from these meetings and updated demographic and financial projections Hidden Falls Regional Park, Placer County. Kate were used to develop the Master Plan Update for served as Project Manager for a series of projects at 2010-2020, which included prioritized Hidden Falls Regional Park. Projects include recommendations and estimates for facility development of Thematic Design Guidelines for all improvements, programs, and staffing, a funding park improvements; conceptual design of the analysis, and implementation plan. Environmental Education Center and interpretive facilities; design of interpretive signage; meetings with Georgetown Divide Recreation District Community the advisory Nature Forum; consultation on access Center Feasibility Study, Greenwood, CA. Kate was roads, overlooks, staging areas and bridge design; and project manager to prepare a feasibility analysis for restoration design. construction of a proposed Recreation/ Aquatic Center for the Georgetown Divide Recreation District. She Arcade Creek Park Preserve Master Plan and worked closely with the GDRD Board to help them Construction Documents, Citrus Heights, CA. Kate identify whether or not available grant funding would served as Principal-in-Charge and Project Manager to be adequate to build the intended project given the oversee preparation of the master plan and anticipated costs associated with various site construction documents for the Arcade Creek Park constraints. The analysis included evaluation of six Preserve. The park comprises 10 acres, with Arcade individual sites on a 141-acre parcel for development Creek flowing through the heavily forested site. Kate of small gymnasium/recreation facility with potential facilitated three community meetings and three focus to accommodate future expansion. Site investigations groups during the Prop 84 grant application process to included natural resources (wetlands, protected trees, elicit comments about the desires and needs of local and special status species), mining claims, grading, residents. The master plan envisions a multi-functional environmental impacts, infrastructure, adjacent land neighborhood park that combines habitat uses, historic resources, and traffic. enhancement, flood control, stormwater treatment, environmental education, and recreation. Recreation Bayley House Barn Retrofit Master Plan and improvements include a trail system, children’s Permitting, Pilot Hill, CA. Bayley House Barn is a adventure play area, workout stations, picnic area, and popular venue for community activities ranging from interpretive signs. basketball to weddings. Kate served as Project Manager to prepare a Special Use Permit application Chili Bar Recreation Area and Restoration Design, for the Bayley House Barn to allow operation after Placerville, CA. Kate prepared an integrated daylight hours and for use of more than fifty people at restoration plan and park design for this major rafting a time. The SUP application included preparation of a put-in on the South Fork American River. Regulation of site plan for the 9.4-acre site and a preliminary grading flows and releases from the Chili Bar Dam were and drainage plan for parking and entry site factored into anticipated visitation patterns and levels improvements. A conceptual plan was also prepared of use. The process included historical and ecological for improvements to vehicle access and parking and analyses, conceptual plan, presentations for public pedestrian connections. Site improvements were comment, and final design with illustrative and evaluated to identify any regulatory permitting construction drawings. This site analysis was expanded requirements.

5

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson

Ed Armstrong Senior Landscape Architect/ Recreation Planner

Education Ed Armstrong specializes in natural systems design/planning, Master of Landscape Architecture, restoration, and creating places with beneficial environmental University of Oregon, Eugene, 1995 processes. He has 16 years of experience in planning and design for regional parks, trails and open space systems; watershed and creek Bachelor of Landscape Architecture, systems; and wetland, stream and riparian restoration projects, with University of Oregon, Eugene, 1994 a focus on enhancing public use while preserving and restoring Bachelor of Science (Physics), natural habitat. He also has extensive experience in application of University of California, Davis, 1985 CAD, GIS and 3D modeling to visualization of landscape systems for resource analysis and impact assessment and ten years experience in Registrations systems engineering for satellite and computer networks.

Landscape Architect, California License Representative Experience #4870; Oregon License #717 Arcade Creek Park Preserve, Citrus Heights, CA. Principal landscape Affiliations architect for development of this open space park preserve. Improvements included a 10-space parking lot, public plaza with American Society of Landscape picnic shelter, trails, bridges, kiosk with interpretive signage, play Architects pockets, a boardwalk, and creek/riparian restoration. Placer Sustain, Board of Directors Sly Park Recreation Area Master Plan, Pollock Pines, CA. Assistant Experience project manager for development of a master plan for the Sly Park Foothill Associates, Manager of recreation area, an approximately 1600 acre recreation area in El Planning & Design Dorado County focused upon a 650 acre reservoir. Development of the master plan included inventory of existing conditions, facilitation Design Workshop, GIS Project Manager of a series of public workshops to identify concerns and visions for Institute for a Sustainable Environment, the recreation area, establishment of goals and objectives consistent GIS Planner with public visions, and development of recommendations for improving the recreation facilities. Globalstar L.P., Sr. Systems Engineer Markham Ravine Nature Area Master Plan, Lincoln, CA. Project Lockheed Technical Operations Co., Sr. manager and landscape architect for development of an open space Systems Engineer trail system. Enhancements included Class I bike trails, riparian plantings, water quality improvements, a nature center, bridges and other amenities. A Master Plan was developed and phase 1 construction documents were created. Foothill Associates also prepared the CEQA document.

Hidden Falls Regional Park, Auburn, CA. Developed Thematic Design Guidelines for the entire park, conceptual designs and construction documents for scenic overlook structure, and construction documents for bridge aesthetic enhancements. Also developed concepts for streambank restoration and an associated staging area and conducted alignment field studies for new hiking/equestrian trails.

6

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson

Correll-Rodgers Enhancement Plan, Woodland, CA. Tempo Park Improvements, Citrus Heights, CA. Project manager for restoration plan for two mining Conceptual design and construction drawings for pits near Woodland. Project involved evaluating demolition of swimming pool and parking lot and existing riparian habitat, water quality and site construction of trails, stormwater swales, and low hydraulics and developing recommendations for water use plantings. enhancing the pits while protecting adjacent property. Plan included three alternative designs that were Robla Park Wetlands Restoration, Sacramento, CA. further refined into a preferred alternative that Project manager for development of conceptual plans restored hydrologic connections between the mining and construction documents for improvements to pits and the creek and enhanced riparian habitat. wetlands and natural resources at Robla Park in Concepts for public access and interpretive education Sacramento. Enhancements included vegetation were included in initial designs, but removed from the management, tree and native grass plantings, final plan due to neighborhood concerns. irrigation improvements, and additional benches.

Camp Far West Campsite ADA Improvement, El Dorado County Parks and Trails Master Plan. Wheatland, CA. Prepared design concepts and Inventoried existing County trails and assisted with construction documents for ADA accessibility at one facilitation of public meetings for creation of a Master campsite adjacent to the boat launch restrooms at Plan for parks and trails in El Dorado County. Camp Far West. Improvements provided universal access to the campsite and restrooms through the Citrus Heights Creek Corridor Trail Study, Citrus addition of ramps, relocation of table and fire pit, and Heights, CA. Assisted in development of design leveling campsite grades. criteria, field investigations and opportunities and constraints analysis for feasibility study focused on Nevada Beach Day Use and Campground BMP identification of creek corridor segments suitable for Retrofit, Douglas County, NV. Principal in Charge for multi-use trails. enhancements to the US Forest Service’s Nevada Beach Day Use and Campground. Improvements Dry Creek Greenway Regional Vision Master Plan, include detention/infiltration basins, beach access and Placer County, CA. Developed a comprehensive plan internal day-use trails, picnic areas, vegetated for the Dry Creek Greenway, an interconnected screening along boundary, and revegetation along day- network of open space trail and habitat corridors. use trails. Low Impact Development techniques are Responsibilities included review of existing County, being used throughout the day use areas to handle City and Community plans to assess opportunities and runoff on-site and reduce potential impacts of constraints for the Greenway, definition of vision stormwater on Lake Tahoe. statements and implementation strategies, definition of Greenway recreational and habitat corridors, Chihuahuan Desert Nature Park, Las Cruces, New conduction of public workshops, planning for Mexico. Project manager for development of park recreation trails and staging areas for this segment of comprehensive plan showcasing Chihuahuan Desert the regional 70 mile recreational trail system, and cost ecosystems. Duties included public participation estimating. Also developed a Capital Improvement workshops, site analysis; identification of opportunities Plan for the Greenway. and constraints; development of exhibit guidelines, plant and animal communities and phasing plans; and Elk Grove Creek Trail Corridor at SR99, Elk Grove, CA. site design for park facilities including entrance road, Conceptual design and construction documents for plaza, trails and exhibits. This project won a New mitigation and buffer plantings for the Elk Grove Creek Mexico state APA award. Trail, an approximately 1 mile class I trail along Elk Grove Creek. Valley View Park Master Plans, El Dorado Hills, CA. Project manager for master planning of four parks. Park Meadows Open Space Management Plan and Parks included a large regional community park and Landscape Design, Elk Grove, CA. Project manager for three smaller neighborhood parks. Natural resources landscape design services including site analysis, constraints were significant factors in development of development of conceptual designs and construction these plans. documents, and construction monitoring for Class I trail and associated landscaping for open space trail system along Laguna and Elk Grove Creeks.

7

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson

Kyrsten Shields Senior Regulatory Specialist

Education Kyrsten Shields has over ten years of experience managing projects as Bachelor of Science, Natural Resource a Regulatory Specialist, including private sector and public agency Planning; Minor-Soils, Humboldt State experience. Kyrsten has demonstrated expertise managing and University, Arcata, CA, 2003 preparing CEQA Initial Studies and Mitigated Negative Declarations; NEPA Environmental Assessments and Categorical Exclusions; and Affiliations conditional use permits. Kyrsten has served as Assistant Project Manager for several EIRs, as well as a joint EIR/EIS, and has prepared Association of Environmental numerous EIR Sections. Kyrsten is also adept at managing and Professionals preparing a wide range of environmental permitting documents, California Forest Soils Council including: Section 404 Individual Permits and Letters of Permission, Section 404 Nationwide Permits, Section 401 Water Quality Workshops Certifications, and CDFG 1600 permits for a wide range of projects. SB 18 Intergovernmental Consultation She has also prepared Army Corps of Engineers Operations and Management Plans, Mitigation Plans, Conservation Easement U.C. Davis Extension Coursework Language and other permitting support documentation. She is National Environmental Policy Act accustomed to presenting complex and controversial project-related (NEPA) Overview and Refresher analyses and information before Planning Commissions and Board of Supervisors, as well as special committees and members of the Clean Water Act Section 404: public. Nationwide and Other Specialized Permits Representative Experience Planning in California: An Overview and Markham Ravine Nature Area Master Plan IS/MND, Lincoln, CA. As Update the CEQA Project Manager, Kyrsten managed and prepared responses to City comments and Screencheck Draft IS/MND. She Interest-Based Negotiation for Planning prepared Aesthetics, Agriculture, Geology and Soils, Hazards and and Resource Management Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Population and Thresholds of Significance in Housing, Recreation, Land Use and Planning, Mineral Resources, Environmental Planning Noise, Public Services, and Utilities and Transportation analysis sections for the Master Plan and improvements proposed along the Surface Mining & Reclamation Act Markham Ravine corridor in the City of Lincoln. Experience Lakeridge Park IS/MND, Magalia, CA. As Project Manager, Kyrsten Foothill Associates, Environmental prepared for the Paradise Recreation and Park District (PRPD). PRPD Planner/Regulatory Specialist is proposing to develop community park recreational facilities EIP Associates, Environmental consisting of active play areas, a pavilion, picnic tables, botanical Professional II gardens, paths and trails, associated parking and rest rooms, and undisturbed open space on a currently undisturbed 28-acre site in the Lake County Community Development unincorporated community of Magalia in Butte County, California. Department, Senior Resource Planner PRPD adopted the IS/MND February 8, 2011.

Galt Parks Master Plan Update IS/MND. As CEQA Project Manager, Kyrsten managed and prepared portions of the IS/MND analyzing the City’s proposed planning strategy for the provision and management

8

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson of recreation facilities and programs in the area and documentation to accurately assess and document defined by the City of Galt and its Sphere of Influence. the foreseeable direct, indirect and cumulative effects associated with the proposed Marin County Airport Sly Park Recreation Area Master Plan EIR, El Dorado (Gnoss Field) runway and taxiway extensions, as well County, CA. Kyrsten prepared responses to agency as drainage realignments and the construction of comments on the Draft EIR. Prepared Agriculture, levees to protect the runway extension from flooding. Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Land Use and Planning, Public Services, and Utilities Red Bluff Wastewater Reclamation Plant Treatment and Service Systems EIR sections. Reliability, Red Bluff, CA. Kyrsten is manager for preparation of a CEQA Class 2 Categorical Exemption Farron Street Pedestrian and Bike Crossing IS/MND, for improvements to the Red Bluff Wastewater Auburn, CA. As Project Manager, Kyrsten managed the Reclamation Plant, as well as CEQA-Plus preparation of the Public Review IS/MND and documentation relevant to federal funding sources. responded to public comments on the document. The proposed project will improve the reliability of the Prepared Land Use, Geology and Soils, Public Services, secondary treatment process and includes the removal Recreation, and Utilities and Service Systems Initial two aging 45-foot diameter secondary water clarifiers Study sections. Also prepared DFG Section 1600 and installation of a redundant 80-foot clarifier. Streambed Alteration Agreement Application. North East Warner Fuels Reduction and Habitat Sunrise Complete Streets Phase 1 and 3, Citrus Restoration EA, Modoc County, CA and Washoe Heights, CA. As the CEQA/NEPA Project Manager, County, NV. As NEPA Project Manager, Kyrsten Kyrsten is managing and preparing CEQA and NEPA managed EA preparation, including preparing documentation, as well as the Preliminary documentation describing the Proposed Action and Environmental Study on behalf of the City of Citrus Alternatives, and the Affected Environment, as well as Heights for review and approval by Caltrans District 3. environmental analysis evaluating the potential direct, Phase 1 was finalized June 2011. Environmental indirect and cumulative environmental effects of review for Phase 3 was completed November 2012. project implementation pursuant to NEPA statute as well as BLM NEPA Handbook H-1790-1. Old Redwood Highway Street Improvement Project, Cotati, CA. As Project Manager, Kyrsten is managing Arcade Creek Park Preserve, Citrus Heights, CA. preparing CEQA and NEPA documentation (CEQA Kyrsten managed permit applications, regulatory IS/MND and NEPA Cat Ex) on behalf of the City of compliance documentation, and agency consultations Cotati relevant to street improvements proposed as for the development of 10-acre park preserve with components of the City’s Downtown Specific Plan. multi-functional neighborhood park, habitat Kyrsten also coordinated with Caltrans District 4 staff enhancement, flood control, stormwater treatment, and managed the preparation of site-specific technical and multi-use trails. Kyrsten prepared Section 401 studies, including CTS habitat assessment and Section Water Quality Certification, Section 404 Nationwide 106 evaluation in support of Caltrans NEPA Findings. Permit, CDFW Streambed Alteration Agreement, and facilitated informal Section 7 consultation. Auburn Lake Trails Water Treatment Plant EA/FONSI- IS/MND, Cool, CA. As joint Project Manager, Kyrsten Lucerne Third Avenue, Lucerne, CA. Kyrsten managed and prepared documentation describing the processed the Section 404 and 401 permits for the Proposed Action and Alternatives, and the Affected geotechnical exploratory borings in the lakebed of Environment, as well as environmental analysis Clear Lake, coordinated a feasible mitigation plan for evaluating the potential direct, indirect and cumulative project-related impacts to biological resources, and environmental effects of project implementation obtained Section 404 authorization for project-related within the joint CEQA-NEPA document disclosing water improvements involving the fill of waters of the U.S. treatment improvements proposed by the Georgetown She also processed the Section 401 Water Quality Divide Public Utility District. Certification. The design features the restoration and extension of an existing sea-wall, a new fishing pier Gnoss Field Airport Runway Extension EIS/EIR, Marin extending into the lake with a shade structure and County, CA. As Foothill Associates’ Assistant Project boat docks, a shaded picnic area, a kiosk with Manager, Ms. Shields is coordinating preliminary site interpretive signage, and a parking lot. assessments and the preparation of EIS/EIR analyses

9

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson

2.3 Firm Profile Founded in 1995, Foothill Associates is a California Corporation and Small Business (supplier #20864) that provides a wide range of landscape architectural and environmental consulting services to local governments, public agencies, and private clients.

We are distinguished from our competitors by the range of complementary services we provide and our ability to assemble internal multidisciplinary teams that are tailored to the specific requirements of each unique project. With this range of skills, we are qualified to address a broad array of landscape architectural projects, and provide solutions that incorporate sensitivity to environmental resources from initial project conception through final completion. This integrated approach to project execution typically results in better assessment of the issues, more innovative design, lower costs, and shorter timeframes.

We are distinguished from our competitors in the parks and recreation planning field by our ability to assemble internal multidisciplinary teams that are tailored to the specific requirements of each unique project. Our services include all the traditional aspects of parks, trails, and recreation planning and design services along with associated regulatory compliance such as CEQA/NEPA, GIS analysis and mapping, survey development, impact fee studies, and public meeting facilitation. In addition, we provide arborist services, and design of stormwater and Low Impact Development (LID) features. By providing all of these services in-house we offer exceptional efficiency, quality, and value.

This integrated approach to project execution is an intentional business model that has evolved over time based on what we have learned about the best way to serve our clients. It typically results in better assessment of the issues, more innovative solutions, lower costs, and shorter timeframes.

We are committed to providing the highest quality services to our clients at competitive rates and to being responsive to our clients’ needs. We recognize that maintaining excellent relationships with our clients is our most valuable asset, and we strive always to make projects as enjoyable and rewarding as possible for our clients.

Services provided by Foothill Associates include:  Planning and Landscape Architecture  Regulatory Permitting and Compliance  Resource Assessment  GIS and Technical Services  Water Resources  Web and Creative Services  Environmental Documentation (CEQA/NEPA)

Planning and Landscape Architecture Foothill Associates specializes in the planning and design of parks and recreation facilities, open space, streetscapes, and public spaces. We have prepared numerous design guidelines, master plan documents, presentation graphics, preliminary plans, construction documents, bid documents, cost estimates, and construction specifications for public and private parks and recreation facilities, open spaces, streetscapes, urban plazas, mitigation banks, restoration projects, and residential developments. We are adept at facilitating public meetings, conducting public outreach, and providing bid coordination, construction administration and monitoring services with multiple agencies and clients. In addition, Foothill Associates provides unique expertise in conducting biological resources studies, impact assessments, and regulatory compliance for complex projects.

Our diverse staff includes a wide range of technical specialists; including landscape architects, biologists, botanists, arborists, and water quality and stormwater specialists. This unique multidisciplinary mix of expertise allows us to integrate human uses, aesthetics, and functionality in our projects with key environmental considerations such as treatment of stormwater runoff, habitat and special status species preservation, green house gas reduction, and water conservation.

10

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson

Our areas of expertise include:  Park and Recreation Planning and Design  Low Impact Development  Project Feasibility Analysis  Restoration Design  Site Opportunities and Constraints Analysis  Interpretive Features and Signage  Open Space Planning and Management  Neighborhood Redevelopment  Land Use Planning  Streetscape Design  Mitigation Planning, Design, and Monitoring  City and Urban Design  Bicycle and Recreation Trails  Capital Improvement Programming  Community Workshop/Meeting Facilitation  Community Service Planning

Environmental Documentation (CEQA/ NEPA) Foothill Associates provides development of CEQA and NEPA environmental documents often in coordination with other regulatory permitting and mitigation planning and design. Our approach to environmental documentation is to work closely with project planners, designers, engineers, and the regulatory agencies during project development to help identify strategies to limit impacts and incorporate self-mitigating elements. This typically results in shorter project timelines, lower mitigation costs, and fewer public concerns during the review period. We work closely with the client to identify the appropriate type of environmental document for each project taking into consideration the various impacts, public sensitivity, budget, and funding sources. We maintain relationships with a select group of subconsultants for special technical studies as needed, and carefully choose those whose expertise is most suited to a particular project. Our goal for every environmental document is to provide a complete and technically defensible document that will meet all legal requirements, while also being concise and economical for the client.

11

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson

2.4 Related Project Experience Following are descriptions of projects that demonstrate our experience successfully completing projects with key elements similar to the Anderson River Park Master Plan Update within budget and on schedule. Key elements of this project include:

 Park Master Planning  CEQA Documentation  Public Outreach  Grant/Fundraising Support  Landscape Design  Arborist Surveys

2.4.1 Project Matrix

KEY ELEMENTS

Park Master Planning Public Outreach Design Landscape CEQA Documentation Fundraising Grant/ Support Survey Arborist Arcade Creek Park Preserve Master Plan,      Construction Documents, and Permitting Henningsen-Lotus Park Conceptual Master Plan     Hidden Falls Regional Park      Correll/Rodgers Pond Enhancement Plan   City of Galt Parks Master Plan Update and     IS/MND Lakeridge Park IS/MND   Sly Park Recreation Area Master Plan and EIR       Markham Ravine Nature Area Master Plan and      IS/MND Georgetown Divide Recreation District    Community Center Feasibility Study Chili Bar Concept Plan and Feasibility Study    Kimler Ranch Park Master Plan    Daugherty Hill Wildlife Area Land Management   Plan

12

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson

2.4.2 Project Summaries

Arcade Creek Park Preserve Master Plan, Construction Documents, and Permitting, Citrus Heights, Sacramento County, CA Foothill Associates prepared the master plan for the Sunrise Recreation and Park District’s Arcade Creek Park Preserve, a heavily forested site with native oak woodland and riparian vegetation. Arcade Creek, a highly degraded urban creek with steep eroding banks, flows through the parcel. Foothill Associates prepared an opportunity and constraints analysis based on GIS data, a wetland assessment performed by our biologists, and a site evaluation by our landscape architects and arborists. This analysis helped design the Preserve by identifying areas to avoid, thereby minimizing impacts to sensitive resources and streamlining the permitting process.

Foothill Associates facilitated two community meetings to elicit desires, needs, and concerns of local residents. In addition to an overall conceptual design, the final master plan included a cost estimate, an analysis of environmental permitting requirements, identification of possible funding sources, recommendations for obtaining LEED certification, and a maintenance plan.

Foothill Associates assisted SRPD with preparation of the Prop 84 grant proposal for construction of the park improvements. We also organized five community outreach events, including site tours, and hands on workshops with local elementary school children. The project received Prop 84 funding in 2012 and Foothill Associates was selected to develop construction documents and obtain regulatory permits (US Army Corps of Engineers, CDFW).

In addition to an overall conceptual design, the final master plan included a cost estimate, an analysis of environmental permitting requirements, identification of possible funding sources, recommendations for obtaining LEED certification, and a maintenance plan. The preserve features a group picnic and play area, multi-use trail, Low Impact Development (LID) parking lot with bioswales, boardwalk through wetland features, informational kiosk, par-course work out stations, and interpretive signage. The final plan includes removal of invasive plant material species and regrading, stabilization, and revegetation of the creek banks.

Henningsen-Lotus Park Conceptual Master Plan, Lotus, El Dorado County, CA Henningsen-Lotus Park is a 51-acre park with little league fields, soccer fields, trails, play areas, picnic areas, Pavilion, and access to the American River. The park offers put-in and take-out access to the American River along with a beach area for swimming. The park is also popular location for weddings, social events, fundraisers, and classes. Foothill Associates prepared a conceptual plan for park improvements based on opportunities and constraints assessment and public outreach campaign. The public engagement process included a site tour, community open house, and an online survey. The master plan identified proposed improvements and implementation strategy, including prioritization of improvements, estimated cost of improvements, operational and maintenance, regulatory and environmental requirements, and funding opportunities.

13

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson

Hidden Falls Regional Park, Auburn, Placer County, CA Hidden Falls Regional Park is an 1180-acre open space park in Placer County with many opportunities for passive recreation and multi-use trails. Coon and Deadman Creeks flow through the park along with waterfalls. The park’s expansion allowed for additional planned multi-use trails for hikers, bikers, and equestrians and passive recreational use. Foothill Associates provided trail planning, site design and evaluation, cost estimating, and schematic design of the park access roads and hiking and equestrian staging areas; aesthetic design of three new bridges and an overlook; and park/visitor center site facility rehab. We met with forums of trail users and cultural/educational professionals to develop the thematic design standards. We provided environmental consulting support through impact analysis, mitigation planning, and restoration design. As part of the trail alignment process, our biologists mapped habitats on aerial photographs which our landscape architects then used to help identify significant resources, propose the most scenic locations and most logical access points.

Correll/Rodgers Pond Enhancement Plan, Yolo County, CA Foothill Associates developed an enhancement plan for aggregate mining pits located in the historic floodplain of Cache Creek. The pits were created in the 1960s during aggregate mining operations and in the process became hydraulically isolated from the creek. The goal of this project was to improve the hydrologic connection and habitat values of the pits, while providing opportunity for future controlled public access to the site.

Foothill Associates assessed existing creek hydrology, hydraulics, habitat and recreation potential, developed goals and objectives for the project, and created three concept plans for enhancement of the pits. These concept plans provided for the reconnection of Cache Creek to the pits during high flows and improved wetland, riparian woodland, and oak grassland habitat. Foothill Associates worked with the client and a Technical Advisory Committee to determine a preferred alternative and prepared a final concept grading and planting plan, maintenance and management plan, and cost estimate.

City of Galt Parks Master Plan Update and IS/MND, Galt, CA Foothill Associates prepared the City of Galt’s Parks Master Plan Update. The process included community analysis, inventory of facilities and programs, planning criteria, needs and preferences analysis, and development of a financing plan. Numerous methods were used to gather community input: community workshops using a variety of interactive activities and discussion; a community phone survey to determine preferences and attitudes towards parks and recreation; an interest group survey to determine specific preferences and trends among park/program users; and a project web site with updates about project events, status, findings, reports, and an online version of the interest group survey. Our park planners evaluated existing and projected demographic changes in the city through 2025; inventoried existing public parks, recreation and open space land, trail systems, facilities, and programs; and assessed existing recreation resources and programs to identify deficiencies and surplus resources. The financing plan included projected costs for proposed improvements, new facilities, and incremental changes in operations and maintenance costs to update the nexus for development impact fees and Quimby fees. The Master Plan was developed to reflect the direction and goals of the City’s General Plan. Foothill Associates prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Master Plan Update. Master Plan analyses were approached at a programmatic level, were tiered off of the City’s General Plan, and evaluated a comprehensive

14

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson range of ongoing and proposed future recreational improvements proposed by the City. The City adopted the Master Plan Update and the Mitigated Negative Declaration August 17, 2010.

Lakeridge Park IS/MND, Magalia, Butte County, CA Foothill Associates prepared an Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the Lakeridge Park project proposed by Paradise Recreation and Park District (PRPD). PRPD completed a Master Plan in 2002 identifying future needs and priorities. The Magalia area was identified as needing additional park and recreation resources and acquisition and development of park land in the Magalia planning area was identified as a top priority for the District. Based on these needs, PRPD is proposing to develop community park recreational facilities consisting of active play areas, a pavilion, picnic tables, botanical gardens, paths and trails, associated parking and rest rooms, and undisturbed open space on a currently undisturbed 28-acre site in the unincorporated community of Magalia in Butte County, California. The IS/MND and MMRP was approved by the District in February 2011.

Sly Park Recreation Area Master Plan and EIR, Pollock Pines, El Dorado County, CA Foothill Associates prepared the Master Plan and Master Environmental Impact Report for El Dorado Irrigation District (EID) for the 1,600-acre Sly Park Recreation Area, which includes Jenkinson Lake. The lake and park are a heavily utilized recreation destination, drawing visitors from throughout northern and central California. The Master Plan provides EID with guidance for developing, redeveloping, maintaining, and managing the recreation facility over the next 20 years in a manner that preserves the integrity of the lake for water storage and supply.

This project involved detailed site and facilities assessments; design guidelines; and design, cost estimates, and Return on Investment analysis of over 20 improvement areas incorporating anticipated fee revenues. Areas include campgrounds, marina/boat launch, day use areas, group campgrounds, lodging, trails, interpretive and education facilities, habitat improvements, and amphitheater. Phasing recommendations were provided for all 20+ projects along with a 10-year Capital Improvement Plan.

Some of the key challenges of developing the Sly Park Recreation Area Master Plan were balancing multiple recreation, utility, and resource objectives; creating opportunities for quality recreation; revenue generation and fiscal constraints; reducing user conflicts; improving public safety; and protection of natural, cultural and historical resources. The project included preparation of a Master Plan, Master EIR with all supporting technical studies, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Market and Economic Analysis, Forest Management Plan, and extensive public workshops.

Markham Ravine Nature Area Master Plan and IS/MND, Lincoln, Placer County, CA Foothill Associates worked on a 200± acre project with the City of Lincoln within the Markham Ravine corridor to restore and enhance wildlife habitat values, improve the aesthetic appearance of the corridor, enhance flood protection and management, and create an open space system that is a regional recreational destination. The project involved the development of an overall concept plan, master plan, and the preparation of Phase 1 construction documents. Improvements

15

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson within the corridor included a Class I trail system, interpretive signage, a nature interpretive center, pedestrian bridge crossings, picnic areas, and parking/staging areas. New overflow channels and wetland basins will increase storm water management options and habitat diversity within the corridor. Design considerations were carefully coordinated and managed to minimize or eliminate the need for Federal permits and to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Foothill prepared an Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Markham Ravine Nature Area Master Plan, including the 20 individually proposed improvement projects. Foothill Associates staff conducted all resource assessment and jurisdictional delineation work. This project included numerous public presentations to community groups, the city Parks and Recreation Committee, and City Council.

Georgetown Divide Recreation District Community Center Feasibility Study, Greenwood, El Dorado County, CA Foothill Associates prepared a feasibility analysis for construction of a proposed Recreation/ Aquatic Center for the Georgetown Divide Recreation District. We worked closely with the GDRD Board to help them identify whether or not available grant funding would be adequate to build the intended project given the anticipated costs associated with various site constraints. The analysis included evaluation of six individual sites on a 141-acre parcel for development of small gymnasium/recreation facility with potential to accommodate future expansion. Site investigations included natural resources (wetlands, protected trees, and special status species), mining claims, grading, environmental impacts, infrastructure, adjacent land uses, historic resources, and traffic.

Chili Bar Concept Plan and Feasibility Study, Placerville, El Dorado County, CA Chili Bar Park is an important rafting put-in location on the south fork of the American River, located near Placerville, CA. The County acquired additional land adjacent to the existing park. Foothill Associates prepared a preliminary master plan investigating options for re-use of the existing buildings and redevelopment of the former mobile home park. After a site visit and discussions with County staff about the desired uses of the site, a conceptual planning document and cost estimate were prepared to evaluate the financial feasibility of potential uses of the site. After receiving additional feedback from the County a Preliminary Master Plan was prepared including group camping/ day use, tent camping, RV camping, and picnic areas.

Kimler Ranch Park Master Plan, Grass Valley, Nevada County, CA Foothill Associates prepared Bear River Recreation and Park District’s Kimler Ranch Park Master Plan with a final design that balances historic preservation, preservation of fragile ecosystems, and development of a multi-use regional park facility addressing the needs of the residents of the northern part of the district. Kimler Ranch is an approximately 32-acre parcel located near Grass Valley, California, planned for development into a public park. Kimler Ranch Park is intended to be available to the public for daytime passive recreation activities such as hiking, jogging, bird watching, and picnicking. Numerous technical studies were prepared as part of the master plan including a site survey, topographic mapping, biological resource assessment, archeological resource assessment, historic architecture resource assessment, noise study, and traffic study. Foothill Associates coordinated all technical studies and used the data to develop an opportunities and constraints analysis that drove

16

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson the end design. The master plan includes interpretive signs and markers highlighting the area’s special historic and natural value, ranging from riparian seasonal wetland habitat to a pioneer cemetery. A children’s play area and community garden area are incorporated into the park, and a roughly one-mile-long walking and jogging trail system circles the park. Existing structures on the property, some dating from the 1800’s, will be used as District offices, caretaker residence, meeting room, equipment storage, and a group picnic area.

Daugherty Hill Wildlife Area Land Management Plan, Yuba and Butte Counties, CA Foothill Associates developed the land management plan for Daugherty Hill Wildlife Area for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). Daugherty Hill Wildlife Area encompasses 5,555 acres in the northern Sierra foothills in parts of Yuba and Butte counties, California. The land was acquired by CDFW to maintain the deer migration corridor, preserve and enhance natural communities and wildlife, provide public education, and provide public use. Public uses include hunting, fishing, nature study, access for equestrian riding, biking, and hiking. Foothill Associates reviewed current management plans, evaluated existing biological and cultural information, identified data gaps, conducted vegetation mapping using spatial data sets and applying the Keeler- Wolf vegetation classification method, facilitated public meetings for the purpose of stakeholder input, identified recreational hunting and public use strategies, and prepared a draft land management plan. We prepared the Initial Study and Proposed Negative Declaration. 2.5 References The following references are evidence of our history of repeat business with clients. We welcome you to contact our references to attest to the quality of our work and to confirm our delivery of projects in a timely and cost efficient manner.

Vickie Sanders, Parks Manager, County of El Dorado, (530) 621-7538, [email protected] Projects: Henningsen-Lotus Park Conceptual Master Plan, El Dorado County Parks and Trails Master Plan

Dave Mitchell, District Administrator, Sunrise Recreation and Park District, (916) 725-2541, [email protected] Projects: Tempo Park Improvements, Shadowcreek Park Improvements, Arcade Creek Park Preserve, Recreation and Park Master Plan, Roseview Neighborhood Park

Andy Fisher, Park Planner, County of Placer, Parks Division, (530) 889-6819, [email protected] Projects: Hidden Falls Regional Park

17

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson

3 SCOPE OF WORK

Task 1: Site Analysis/Assessment The project will begin with an assessment of the entire ARP site to identify existing conditions including recreation facilities, natural resources, roads, buildings, and evident utilities. The assessment will examine both opportunities and constraints that might influence the potential for expanded or different recreational improvements on the City owned property, and how they might interface with the overall configuration and use of the entire park.

A general arborist survey will be done to describe the overall canopy cover, species, and general condition of park trees. Other landscape and natural resource areas will be examined to identify those for preservation and those that could be renovated or reconfigured. The site analysis will result in an updated base map for ARP using existing GIS, CAD, and aerial imagery data sources for topography, parcel boundaries, floodplain, hydrology, and facility locations. As part of the site analysis, the uses and general conditions of existing buildings and facilities will be catalogued and documented. This information will be used to help determine if major repairs and renovations need to be reflected in the Master Plan Update implementation program and cost estimates. Interviews will be conducted with City staff representatives and key stakeholders (Parks and Recreation, Planning, Public Works, Park Board, etc.) as needed to gather information on existing conditions, management practices, and maintenance concerns. Existing documents and relevant background materials relating to the project will also be reviewed.

The findings of the Site Analysis will be compiled into an Existing Conditions report and an Opportunities and Constraints Report. These will be provided to City staff for review and comment prior to being made available to the public as part of the outreach process.

Deliverables:  ARP Base Map showing topography, parcel boundaries, floodplain, hydrology, vegetation, tree canopy, and facility locations  Existing Conditions Report  Opportunities and Constraints Report

Task 2: Community Outreach and Participation The Community Outreach and Participation phase will begin after the Site Assessment is complete. It includes a variety of input methods designed to maximize participation from the community. 2.1: Stakeholder Database Working closely with City staff and existing community, sports, and youth organizations that use the park, we will build a database of potential stakeholders. This database will be used to notify stakeholders of key project activities and to encourage their participation. New names will be added as surveys and workshops are completed. Names will also be gathered from the project web site. All public project materials will also include an e-mail address that residents can use to send a request to be added to the stakeholder database. The database will continue to be a useful tool for the City at the conclusion of the project to keep interested residents informed about ARP activities. 2.2: Project Web Site A project web site will be developed that will provide ongoing information on project purpose, schedule, deliverables, events, and findings. The web site will also offer residents an opportunity to send in their comments and suggestions, so that those who cannot come to the workshops still have a way to stay connected to the project.

18

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson

2.3: Community Vision Workshop The first of two community workshops will focus on gathering input about the future vision for ARP. The workshop will be structured as an informal Open House, with multiple stations where attendees can offer their thoughts and suggestions about the topics that are most important to them. This format will also encourage communication between attendees which will help them better understand the needs of other residents and park users. Ideally this workshop will take place at the park on a weekend day as a special event to encourage participation. 2.4: Park User Survey An online survey will be developed to request information from the community about current and future uses for ARP. The survey may also be printed and filled in manually for those without internet access. The design of the survey will be coordinated with City staff to make sure questions target key issues and reflect a realistic vision for ARP. Notice of survey availability may be given through mailers, media, at recreation programs, via email to the stakeholder database, and through the email lists of other interested organizations. 2.5: Stakeholder/Focus Group Interviews Interviews with up to 6 key stakeholders or groups will be conducted to gather more detailed information about their specific needs and ideas for ARP. These may be conducted as phone interviews depending on the timing and participants’ availability. The interviewees will be identified in collaboration with City staff. 2.6: Community Draft Master Plan Workshop Once a draft master plan has been developed, the second community workshop will be held. At this workshop, the draft plan will be presented with information about recommended projects, costs, and implementation priorities. Participants will be encouraged to provide their comments and suggestions on all aspects of the plan, including recommendations for specific facilities, facility placement, operational strategies, and priorities. This workshop may coincide with a Park Board meeting to provide Board members with an opportunity to hear public comments and to share their views with the community.

Deliverables:  Stakeholder database  Project website and materials to populate the site  Community Vision Workshop and materials  Park User Survey and tabulation  Stakeholder Interviews and summary  Presentation of Draft Master Plan  Public Engagement Report summarizing all input and events

Task 3: Master Plan In this phase, based on needs assessment and community outreach, the existing ARP Mater Plan will be updated. The Master Plan will provide operational, planning, programming, and facility recommendations. The document will include a graphic representation of proposed site modifications, as well as text describing all recommendations, associated cost estimates, and implementation strategies. The site assessment and public engagement summaries developed in prior phases will be included as appendices to the Master Plan.

An administrative draft version of the document will be provided to City staff and CDFW staff for internal review prior to public review. This version of the document will also be used to begin development of the CEQA project description. Comments and edits from City and CDFW staff will be incorporated in the document and the draft Master Plan will be released for public review at least two weeks prior to the second community workshop. Comments from the public and the Park Board will be incorporated into the Final ARP Master Plan. This document will be the final basis for the CEQA environmental analysis.

19

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson

Deliverables:  Administrative, Draft and Final Master Plan including cost estimates and implementation strategy

Task 4: Fundraising Plan A fundraising plan will be developed based on the recommendations in the Final ARP Master Plan. This plan will examine local, regional, and national partnerships that could be useful in achieving the Master Plan vision. Grant strategies including sources and partnership will also be provided that reflect the various types of potential projects and community benefits reflected in the Master Plan, such as community wellness, youth engagement, tree preservation, habitat enhancement, arts and culture, etc. Opportunities for sponsorships, donations, and endowments will also be examined. Strategies to secure these grant and other resources will be described such as collaborative grant writing and public/private fundraising partnerships.

Deliverable:  Fundraising Plan

Task 5: Project Specific Website Support and Progress Reports A project website is described under the Community Outreach and Participation phase. It is assumed this website will be accessed via link from the City’s website. The project website will include but is not limited to project schedule, meeting minutes/notes, and chronology of events. A regular progress report will be submitted with each monthly invoice, and a PowerPoint Presentation will be provided to the Park Board in the early stages of the project to explain the approach and public outreach strategy. A second presentation to the Park Board is also included in the Community Outreach and Participation phase as a Draft Master Plan Workshop. Similarly, summaries of all outreach events are included in the same phase.

Deliverables:  Monthly status reports  Park Board presentation  Others reports and website support as described in Community Outreach and Participation phase

Task 6: California Environmental Quality Act Document Preparation Based on a preliminary assessment of the Master Planning Objectives, as well as a conceptual approach evaluation relevant to the proposed Master Plan Update, an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) may adequately represent the appropriate level of CEQA environmental review required for Master Plan adoption by the City of Anderson (City).

6.1: Administrative Draft IS/MND, Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (NOI), Notice of Completion (NOC) and State Clearinghouse Summary Form Preparation (SCH Summary) Foothill Associates will prepare an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), pursuant to 40 CFR 1501.3 and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15063, respectively. This scope of work assumes that the City will serve as the Lead Agency pursuant to CEQA, Section 21067. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) will serve as a Trustee Agency.

An initial study checklist based on Appendix G of the current CEQA Guidelines will be used to document the potential environmental impacts resulting from implementation of the Master Plan. The Initial Study will evaluate Master Plan components at a “Planning Level” and will contain all mandatory required elements including the following:

1. Project Description. The Project Description will describe the baseline information for the project, as well as the major elements of the Master Plan including the location information, City objectives, and

20

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson

proposed categories of improvements. Following preparation of the administrative draft project description, Foothill Associates shall submit a digital version to the City for review and comment. The final project description, incorporating all comments from the City, will be the basis on which Foothill Associates evaluates potential impacts resulting from implementation of the Master Plan within the Initial Study;

2. Figures identifying the local and regional location of Master Plan Components, and other project characteristics as relevant to CEQA analyses;

3. Disclosure of anticipated potential environmental impacts resulting from implementation of the Master Plan. Foothill Associates will use the initial study checklist (CEQA Guidelines - Appendix G) to prepare the IS. The checklist will contain a narrative of each issue in support of each conclusion and will include discussions (as required by current CEQA statute) relevant to aesthetics, agricultural and forest resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use, mineral resources, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, transportation, utilities, and mandatory findings of significance.

Anticipated areas of primary focus for environmental analyses may include:

 Aesthetics;  Biological Resources;  Geology and Soils,  Cultural/Historical Resources;  Hydrology and Water Quality;  Land Use and Planning;  Noise;  Recreation; and  Traffic/Transportation.

Impact analyses will be drafted at a “Planning Level,” and will primarily rely upon the 2007 City of Anderson General Plan and General Plan Environmental Impact Report. As appropriate, analyses will also rely upon other existing readily-available sources of information, including USGS topographic quadrangles, City and Shasta County planning documents and ordinances, National Resource Conservation Service soils maps, and other documents as relevant to impact analyses prepared and evaluated pursuant to CEQA. No resource-specific technical studies are proposed, other than a Records Search relevant to cultural resources.

6.1.1. Cultural Resources Records Search A historical resources records search of the existing park site will be conducted to identify previous archaeological surveys, historic building surveys, and to identify any previously documented buildings, structures, sites, objects or historic districts located on and adjacent to the park site. The results of the records search will be summarized and incorporated into CEQA impact analyses and proposed mitigation measures.

Where relevant, the IS/MND will identify feasible and tangible mitigation measures to reduce impact levels to levels below significance as applicable to relevant thresholds for all environmental impacts identified in the CEQA Initial Study Checklist as “potentially significant.” This scope of work assumes that all potentially significant impacts can be mitigated to a less than significant level and that an IS/MND will meet the requirements for environmental review pursuant to CEQA.

CEQA analyses will be drafted at a “Planning Level” analyses adequate to clear adoption of the Master Plan Update by the City, but will not include sufficient detail to clear construction of proposed improvements. Individually proposed improvements would be subject to subsequent CEQA review based on site- and project-specific characteristics as proposed for construction.

21

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson

Foothill Associates will prepare a Notice of Completion (NOC) for transmittal to the State Clearinghouse of the Governors Office of Planning and Research (SCH) pursuant to CEQA, Section 21161, and a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (NOI) per CEQA Guidelines Section 15072. As currently recommended by the Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse Guidelines for submittal of IS/MNDs, Foothill Associates will prepare a Summary Form to accompany fifteen (15) complete digital copies of the IS/MND submitted to the State Clearinghouse.

Foothill Associates shall provide the City and CDFW with a single (1) digital copy of the Administrative Draft IS/MND, NOC and NOI, as well as the Summary Form for review and comment. Within fourteen (14) days of receipt of the Administrative Draft IS/MND, NOC, and Summary Form, the City and CDFW shall submit a single (1) consolidated set of written comments (from each agency) to Foothill Associates for incorporation into the documents.

Deliverables:  One (1) digital copy of Draft Project Description to the City  One (1) digital copy of the Administrative Draft IS/MND, NOI, NOC, and Summary Form to the City and CDFW for review and comment.

6.2: Screencheck Draft Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration, Notice of Intent, Notice of Completion and SCH Summary Form Upon the receipt of a single set of written comments from the City and CDFW, Foothill Associates will revise the Administrative Draft IS/MND as necessary to address all City comments and will provide one (1) digital copy of a Screencheck IS/MND to the City for final review and approval of the IS/MND before the document(s) is produced for public review.

Deliverables:  One (1) digital copy of a Screencheck IS/MND

6.3: Public Review Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, Notice of Intent, Notice of Completion, and Final SCH Summary Form Following City approval of the Screencheck document(s), Foothill Associates will finalize the NOC and the Public Review IS/MND for submittal to the State Clearinghouse with the Summary Form, the City, and CDFW.

It is assumed that the City will coordinate the publication of the applicable Notice(s) and posting with the County Clerk prior to circulation of the Public Review IS/MND.

Deliverables:  Digital copy of the Public Review Draft IS/MND, NOC, NOI and Summary Form to the City, CDFW, and the State Clearinghouse.

6.4: Respond to Comments and Prepare Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Following the close of the 30-day public comment period, Foothill Associates will consult with the City and will review all written comments received on the Public Review IS/MND. Together with the City, Foothill Associates will prepare responses to comments received on the Public Review IS/MND. It is assumed that comments will be minor (not requiring additional analysis or studies) and responses will consist primarily of clarifying information and directing commenters to the appropriate discussion in the IS/MND. All comments and responses will be provided in “Memo” format for the City to utilize in a staff report. This scope of work assumes that a separate, “stand alone” Final IS/MND document will not be prepared.

22

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson

Foothill Associates will prepare a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) in accordance with Section 15074(d) of the CEQA Guidelines for incorporation into the IS/MND following completion of the public review period. Alternately, the MMRP can be prepared and included within the Public Review IS/MND if desired by the City. Foothill Associates will provide the City and CDFW with a digital version of the draft MMRP for review and comment prior to finalizing the MMRP. One (1) digital copy of the final MMRP will be provided to the City.

Deliverables:  Response to Comments Memo – One (1) draft digital copy to City, followed by one (1) final digital copy  Draft MMRP – One (1) digital version to City  Final MMRP – One (1) digital copy to City and CDFW. 6.5: Prepare Notice of Determination Following project approval and adoption of the IS/MND by the City, Foothill Associates will prepare the Notice of Determination. It is assumed that the City will file the Notice of Determination with the County Clerk and pay associated fees within five (5) working days following approval of the Master Plan Update.

Deliverables:  Notice of Determination – One (1) digital copy to City

23

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson

4 PROJECT TIMELINE

March/April May JuneJuly August September October November December January February

Task Description 3/31/14 4/7/14 4/14/14 4/21/14 4/28/14 5/5/14 5/12/14 5/19/14 5/26/14 6/2/14 6/9/14 6/16/14 6/23/14 6/30/14 7/7/14 7/14/14 7/21/14 7/28/14 8/4/14 8/11/14 8/18/14 8/25/14 9/1/14 9/8/14 9/15/14 9/22/14 9/29/14 10/6/14 10/13/14 10/20/14 10/27/14 11/3/14 11/10/14 11/17/14 11/24/14 12/1/14 12/8/14 12/15/14 12/22/14 12/29/14 1/5/15 1/12/15 1/19/15 1/26/15 2/2/15 2/9/15 2/16/15 2/23/15 Task 1 - Site Analysis/ Assessment 1.1 Review Existing Document 1.2 Field Assessment 1.3 Staff/CDFW Interviews 1.4 Basemap Development 1.5 Existing Conditions Report 1.6 Opportunities and Constraints Report Task 2 - Community Outreach and Public Participation 2.1 Stakeholder Database 2.2 Project Website 2.3 Community Vision Workshop M 2.4 User Survey 2.5 Stakeholder/Focus Group Interviews 2.6 Community Draft Master Plan Workshop M Task 3 - Master Plan 3.1 Admin Draft Master Plan 3.2 Draft Master Plan 3.3 Final Master Plan Task 4 - - Fundraising Plan 4.1 Fundraising Plan Task 5 - Website Support and Progress Reports 5.1 Monthly Status Reports 5.2 Park Board Presentation M 5.3 See Task 2 above for other support/reports Task 6 - CEQA 6.1 Admin Draft IS/MND, NOI, NOC, SCH Summary 6.2 Screencheck Draft IS/MND, NOI, NOC, SCH Summary 6.3 Public Review Draft IS/MND, NOI, NOC, SCH Summary 6.4 Respond to Comments and MMRP M 6.5 Notice of Determination

Progress M Meeting City/Public Review Deliverable

24

Anderson River Park Master Plan Update City of Anderson

APPENDIX A- ADDITIONAL STAFF RESUMES

Kate Rose Regulatory Specialist

Education Kate Rose is a regulatory specialist with Foothill Associates and a recent Bachelor of Science, Environmental graduate from the University of California Davis where she received Bachelor of Policy Analysis and Planning, Science in Environmental Policy Analysis and Planning as well as a minor in Geographic Information Systems minor, Geographic Information Systems. Her professional background includes University of California, Davis, 2013 documentation pursuant to CEQA such as Initial Studies, Mitigated Negative Declarations, Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program documents and Experience Categorical Exemptions. She has experience managing projects, conducting public outreach events and coordinating with local, state and federal agencies. Foothill Associates, Regulatory She has also completed a variety of projects including Preliminary Specialist Environmental Studies pursuant to NEPA, CWA Section 404 and 401 permitting, County of Sacramento, Department of Pre-Construction Notifications and map creation and resource analysis utilizing Community Development, Division of GIS. Kate also has experience analyzing Census data utilizing American Planning and Environmental Review, Factfinder, MS excel and GIS. Senior Intern Representative Experience City of Davis, Department of Public Works, Recycling Intern Flint Williamson Act Amendment and Grading Permit, Sacramento County, CA. The proposed project involved rescinding the original Williamson Act contract United States Forest Service Pacific and entering into a new one. It also involved breaching a levee in order to Southwest Research Station, Student create a wetland mitigation bank. As the environmental analyst, Kate completed Assistant the IS/MND and the MMRP document and she coordinated with several state and local agencies. In preparing the project for hearing, Kate also created a response to comments letter. She prepared Land Use (including Agricultural Resources), Air Quality, Hydrology, Water Quality, Biological Resources (including a special status species table), and Aesthetics Initial Study sections. Mishra Gathering Place Use Permit, Special Development Permit and Design Review, Sacramento County, CA. The project proponent is requesting a conditional use permit to allow a temple in an Interim Agricultural zone as well as a special development permit and a deviation from the Zoning Code. As the environmental analyst, Kate completed the IS/ND for the project. She prepared Land Use, Water Supply and Sewage Disposal, Traffic and Circulation, Air Quality, Noise, Hydrology, Water Quality, Biological Resources, and Aesthetics Initial Study sections. Cordova Creek Restoration and Naturalization Project, Sacramento County, CA. The proposed project will turn a concrete-lined body of water into a more natural, meandering creek. Kate prepared the draft CWA Section 404 and 401 permit applications and began the draft Biological Assessment for the elderberry shrubs (Sambucus) adjacent to the project site. Oak General Plan Policy Implementation Project, Sacramento County, CA. Kate conducted a research project in which she analyzed the oak woodlands in Sacramento County utilizing GIS. Based on her research on the County General Plan as well as the policies of other jurisdictions, she developed a memorandum for staff which detailed the methodology for assessing impacts to oak trees and for calculating the mitigation costs. Fair Oaks Boulevard – Day Avenue to Arden Way, Sacramento County, CA. As the environmental analyst and project manager, Kate wrote the IS/MND, pursuant to CEQA, as well as the PES, pursuant to NEPA, while acting as the

[email protected]

liaison between the Sacramento County Department of Missionary Gospel Church, Sacramento County, CA. As the Transportation and Caltrans. The proposed project involves environmental analyst, Kate completed the IS/ND and roadside improvements such as the addition of bike lanes, MMRP document for the project. The project proponent sidewalks, curbs and gutters. She prepared Land Use, Public requested a conditional use permit amendment to allow Services, Traffic and Circulation, Air Quality, Noise, the expansion of the church parking lot. She prepared Land Hydrology, Water Quality, Biological Resources, and Toxics Use, Public Services, Traffic and Circulation, Air Quality, and Hazardous Materials Initial Study sections. Hydrology, Water Quality, Biological Resources and Aesthetics Initial Study sections. Contain It 34th Street, Sacramento County, CA. Kate wrote the staff report as well as the Notice of Exemption for the Draft Polystyrene Food Packaging Ordinance, City of Davis, conditional use permit request to allow the outdoor storage CA. As the Recycling Intern for the City of Davis, Kate of recreational vehicles and boats as well as a deviation prepared a draft ordinance which would ban the use of from the sound wall barrier and landscaped planter polystyrene food packaging as well as the draft IS/ND requirements. As the project manager, she conducted the associated with the ban. site visit, represented the project proponent at the Project Draft Scavenging of Recycled Material Ordinance, City of Review Committee meeting and attended the Zoning Davis, CA. As the Recycling Intern for the City of Davis, Kate Administrator hearing. prepared a draft ordinance which would help to prevent Dillard Road Bridge Scour Critical Project, Sacramento scavenging of recycled materials from private bins, a County, CA. As the environmental analyst and project practice which is currently illegal. manager, Kate prepared the PES pursuant to NEPA and Waste Disposal Rate Report, City of Davis, CA. As the facilitated the field reviews. As the project manager, she Recycling Intern for the City of Davis, Kate collected survey coordinated the field review with Sacramento County results from multiple California jurisdictions in order to Department of Transportation and Caltrans. The project asses the waste disposal services (such as collection, street- involves repairing the damage due to scouring on one of the sweeping and education) and rates of each jurisdiction. She bridge piers. created a report which illustrated the services and rates of 2501, 2505 Fulton Avenue Community Plan Amendment each jurisdiction as it compared to Davis for the City and Rezone and Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Council. Sacramento County, CA. The project involved the amendment of a Community Plan and the Zoning Ordinance to allow several parcels in a Special Planning Area and to expand their future uses. As the environmental analyst, Kate completed the IS/ND for the project. She filed a Notice of Intent (NOI) and prepared the project for hearing.

Resume for Kate Rose Page 2 of 2

Candice Guider Environmental Planner/Regulatory Specialist

Education Candice Guider is an environmental planner and regulatory specialist with five Bachelor of Science, Business years experience working on a wide variety of projects for public and private Administration California State sector clients. Her professional background includes assisting with CWA Section University, Sacramento, CA, 2003 404 and 401 permitting, CDFW 1600 Streambed Alteration Agreements, preparing Pre-Construction Notification materials, and Individual Permit U.C. Davis Extension applications. She also has experience in preparing CEQA Initial Studies, Coursework Mitigated Negative Declarations, Environmental Impact Reports, as well as NEPA Successful CEQA Compliance Environmental Impact Statements and Environmental Assessments and Categorical Exclusions. Ms. Guider’s technical writing experience consists of Certifications CEQA and NEPA environmental compliance documents, wetland permitting and State of California Notary Public, endangered species permitting packages, biological resources assessments, and Commission # 1924946 mitigation planning documents. Ms. Guider regularly collaborates with project applicants and agencies to ensure project compliance. Experience Related Experience Foothill Associates Lakeridge Park IS/MND, Magalia, CA. Ms. Guider provided support in the Raney Planning & Management, Inc. preparation of the Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Paradise Recreation and Park District (PRPD). PRPD is proposing to develop community park recreational facilities consisting of active play areas, a pavilion, picnic tables, botanical gardens, paths and trails, associated parking and rest rooms, and undisturbed open space on a currently undisturbed 28-acre site in the unincorporated community of Magalia in Butte County. The IS/MND was adopted on February 8, 2011 by PRPD. Galt Parks Master Plan Update IS/MND. Ms. Guider assisted in the preparation of the IS/MND analyzing the City’s proposed planning strategy for the provision and management of recreation facilities and programs in the area defined by the City of Galt and its Sphere of Influence. The IS/MND was adopted on August 17, 2010 by the City of Galt. Sunrise Complete Streets Phase 1 and 3, Citrus Heights, CA. Ms. Guider is assisting in the preparation of CEQA and NEPA documentation (CEQA IS/MND and NEPA Cat Ex) as well as the Preliminary Environmental Study relevant to proposed Americans Disabilities Act (ADA) and pedestrian access improvements along Sunrise Boulevard in the City of Citrus Heights. Auburn Lake Trails Water Treatment Plant, El Dorado County, CA. Ms. Guider assisted in the preparation of the joint CEQA/NEPA IS/MND EA/FONSI documentation in support of securing a USDA loan for improvements to the Auburn Trails Water Treatment Facility proposed by the Georgetown Divide Public Utility District in coordination with USDA. The USDA was lead agency for NEPA and the District was the lead agency for CEQA. The document was adopted on June 8, 2010. Lake Vera Pipeline Replacement, Nevada County, CA. Ms. Guider assisted in the preparation of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Lake Vera Pipeline Replacement Project for public circulation by Nevada Irrigation District (NID). NID is proposing to replace the existing 4-inch diameter pipeline which is currently leaking that serves the needs of the Clement Hill area of Nevada County with an 8-inch diameter pipeline to satisfy existing customers

[email protected]

needs. The IS/MND and MMRP was adopted in March 2010 Lot 5 of Monte Claire Estates, Placer County, CA. Ms. by the Nevada Irrigation District. Guider assisted the property owner through the environmental planning process associated with the Old Redwood Highway Street Improvement Project, proposed construction of a two-story single-family private Sonoma County, CA. Ms. Guider is assisting in preparing residence, including associated facilities. Tasks include CEQA and NEPA documentation (CEQA IS/MND and NEPA obtaining 404, 1600, 401 permits under the Clean Water Cat Ex) on behalf of the City of Cotati relevant to street Act, development of a mitigation plan to preserve sensitive improvements proposed as components of the City’s oak woodland and annual grassland habitat, and riparian Downtown Specific Plan. In support of CEQA and NEPA Ms. wetlands, coordination with town staff, and agency Guider is also assisting in the preparation an arborist facilitation. survey, wetland delineation, burrowing owl survey, and biological resource analysis for the widening of Highway Persephone Ranch, Napa County. Ms. Guider served as the 101 adjacent to the downtown of Cotati, Ca. task manager to prepare the Pre-Construction Notification for the Army Corps of Engineers for authorization under Lake Front at Walker Ranch EIR, Plumas County, CA. Ms. NWP 40, the 401 Water Quality Certification to the Central Guider aided in preparation and facilitation of the Final Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the 1602 Environmental Impact Report for the Lake Front at Walker Streambed Alteration Agreement per California Fish and Ranch project consisting of a mixed use development Game Code in support of appropriation of approximately located on approximately 1,397 acres on the Lake Almanor 420 acre-feet of water from the Upper Putah Creek peninsula. A total of 1,674 residential units are proposed Watershed for expanded vineyard irrigation in Napa and include a variety of densities ranging from 8 dwelling County. She is also working on the IS/MND environmental units per acre to estate lots, with 1 unit per 1.5 acres. Other document for CEQA compliance. proposed land uses include commercial, hotel/spa facility, golf course, open space corridors/buffers, a wastewater Placer Creek Corporate Center, Placer County, CA. Ms. treatment plant facility and other utilities. The EIR analyzes Guider assisted in the preparation and facilitation of the potential impacts related to aesthetics (visual impacts from Pre-Construction Notification for the Army Corps of Lake Almanor), water quality, biological resources (including Engineers for authorization under NWP 39, along with the potential impacts to existing bald eagle nests), population Section 401 Water Quality Certification, to the Regional and housing, noise, air quality, and traffic. The Final EIR was Water Quality Control Board, for a ±111 acre development certified by Plumas County on March 2, 2010. of commercial land Newtown Canal Rehabilitation Project, Nevada County, Excelsior Estates, Sacramento County, CA. Ms. Guider CA. Ms. Guider prepared the Mitigation Monitoring and prepared and submitted CWA 404 permit application to the Reporting Program (MMRP) component of the Initial Army Corps of Engineers for an 886 acre mixed use Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for public circulation development located adjacent to Kiefer Boulevard and by Nevada Irrigation District in support for proposed Excelsior Road in the unincorporated area of Sacramento improvements to existing canal segments to increase the County. integrity and capacity of the existing conveyance structure Rancho del Oro, Placer County, CA. Ms. Guider assisted to meet the meets of existing and future customers. The with the regulatory component of CWA Section 404 and IS/MND and MMRP were adopted on October 13, 2010 by 401 permitting for a 121 acre proposed development Nevada Irrigation District. located within the Granite Bay Community of Placer County. North East Warner Fuels Reduction and Habitat Granite Lakes Estates, Placer County, CA. Ms. Guider aided Restoration EA, Modoc County, California and Washoe in the preparation of the Pre-Construction Notification for County, NV. Ms. Guider assisted in preparing an the Army Corps of Engineers for authorization under NWP environmental assessment describing the Proposed Action 29 for an 80 acre residential development located in and Alternatives, and the Affected Environment, as well as Rocklin, CA. environmental analysis evaluating the potential direct, indirect and cumulative environmental effects of project Loomis Marketplace, Placer County, CA. Ms. Guider implementation pursuant to NEPA statute as well as BLM prepared the Pre-Construction Notification for the Army NEPA Handbook H-1790-1 on behalf of the Bureau of Land Corps of Engineers for authorization under NWP 39 along Management, Surprise Field Office. In support of the NEPA with the Section 401 Water Quality Certification to the Ms. Guider also prepared a focused botanical assessment Regional Water Quality Control Board for a 60 acre retail and wildlife resources assessment for proposed fuel development adjacent to Interstate 80 and Horseshoe Bar treatment areas to reduce hazardous fuels, treat juniper in Road in Loomis, CA. sage steppe plant communities, improve hydrologic conditions, and enhance forage base for wildlife and domestic animals.

Resume for Candice Guider Page 2 of 2

Kirk Vail, ISA Biologist/Resource Assessment Specialist

Education Mr. Vail has over twenty years of natural resource experience. He has B.S., Botany, U.C. Davis, 1981 conducted many wetland delineations, sensitive plant and botanical surveys, arboricultural surveys, and stream surveys using the California Rapid Single Subject Teaching Credential, Assessment Method (CRAM). He has written many technical reports, interacted Biological Science, National University, with private, State and Federal agency personnel. He has cruised and marked Redding, CA, 2002 timber, and installed tree plots. Certifications and Permits Representative Experience ISA Certified Arborist #WE-4575A Olinda Road Development, Anderson, Shasta County, CA. Conducted the wetland delineation and sensitive plant surveys on the undeveloped 3500 acre Training site. Produced technical documentation and assisted in the preparation of Jurisdictional Delineation of Wetlands graphics for document figures. in the American West Training Course: Peltier Road Development, Redding, Shasta County, CA. Conducted the The National Wetlands Science Training wetland delineation and sensitive plant surveys on 400 acre undeveloped site. Cooperative. March, 1993. Produced technical documentation and assisted in the preparation of graphics California Rapid Assessment Method for document figures. (CRAM) training course: Surface Water Langtry Farms, Pope Valley, Napa County, CA. Conducted oak tree survey for Ambient Monitoring Program timber conversion to vineyard. (SWAMP). April, 2008. Taylor 24 Phase 2, Rocklin CA. Assisted in conducting oak tree field survey for Affiliations the undeveloped 20 acre site. International Society of Arboriculture Coastal Forestlands, Mendocino County, Willits, CA. Developed and conducted the sensitive plant survey on the entire 10,000 acres of privately held Experience forestlands. Produced technical documentation for the surveys. Cruised and Botanist/Arborist, Analytical marked numerous timber harvest plans throughout property. Environmental Services (AES), California Rapid Assessment Method (CRAM) stream survey examples in Sacramento, CA California. Conducted CRAM field surveys and submitted data to ECRAM site. Botanist/Arborist. Gallaway Truckee River (Lake Tahoe), Nacimiento River (Camp Roberts), Little Chico Creek Enterprises, Chico CA (Chico), Cow Creek (Redding), Kings River (Fresno), Lime Kiln Creek (Kaweah River tributary), Peppermint Creek (North Fork Kern River), San Lorenzo Creek Botanist. Chico Research Foundation, (Oakland), San Mateo Creek (San Diego), East Fork Cold Springs Creek (Santa Chico State University, Chico CA Barbara), Horsethief Canyon Creek (Orange County), Coldwater Canyon Creek Environmental Scientist. ENPLAN, (Orange County), Lone Pine Creek (Bishop), San Juan Creek (South Orange Redding, CA County), Aliso Creek (San Diego), Santa Maria River (San Diego). Environmental Scientist. North State Dry Creek Waste Water Treatment Plant, Roseville, CA. Conducted third year Resources, Inc., Redding, CA monitoring on tree replanting project by collecting tree diameter at breast height measurements and tree health assessments. Biological Technician. U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Maidu Village Project, Colfax, CA. Conducted wetland delineation and biological Station, Juneau AK, and Pacific assessment field surveys and produced wetland delineation and biological Southwest Research Station, Redding, resource assessment reports. CA Rocklin Crossings, Rocklin, CA. Arboricultural consultation regarding Botanist/Forestry Technician. Mason, establishment of large native oak trees in commercial development. Bruce and Girard, Redding, CA Horseshoe Bar, Loomis CA. Conducted oak tree field survey and wetland delineation and produced arboricultural report and wetland delineation report as an update to the 2006 reports.

[email protected]

The Whispering Ridge Golf Course Resort and Hotel Complex, Oroville, CA. Performed wetland delineation, sensitive plant survey, CRAM study, mitigation and restoration plan and oak tree conservation plan of the approximately 1,100 acre project. The CRAM study served as baseline stream data for the mitigation and restoration plan. Hicks Lane Property, Chico, CA. Conducted wetland delineation and sensitive plant survey on the approximately 70 acre site. Produced wetland delineation report and sensitive plant section of biological resource assessment report.

Girvan Road Project, Redding, CA. Conducted wetland delineation of waters of the United States on the approximately 9 acre undeveloped parcel, located north of Yvonne Court, in the Redding city limits. Produced wetland delineation report and successfully convinced the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers that the site had lost all previously verified wetlands due to changes in Corps definitions of wetland hydrology and hydrophytic vegetation. Hilltop Drive and Palisades Avenue Parcel, Redding, CA. Conducted wetland delineation of waters of the United

States on the approximately 22 acre undeveloped parcel within the Redding city limits. Produced wetland delineation report.

Honeybee Road Project, Redding, CA. Conducted wetland delineation of waters of the United States on the approximately 11.5 acre undeveloped parcel, located north of Clear Creek Road, in the Redding city limits. Northern California and southeastern Alaska. Provided technical expertise as a biological technician on basic ecological and silvicultural research projects for various scientists of the U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Redding, California, and Pacific Northwest Research Station, Juneau, Alaska. Collected ecological and silvicultural plant samples and data; tabulated data and performed basic statistical analyses; and provided logistical support.

Resume for Kirk Vail Page 2 of 2

Ric Windmiller, MA, RPA Archaeologist

Education Ric Windmiller has directed both small and large-scale cultural and B.A. Anthropology, California State paleontological research projects since 1970. He has conducted University, Sacramento, 1968 research for public and private sector clients in California, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico and Colorado. Windmiller holds Cultural M.A. Anthropology, University of Resource Use Permit CA-05-10 for all Bureau of Land Management Manitoba, Canada, 1974 Lands in California and Nevada Antiquities Permit No. 381 to conduct Post-grad, Anthropology, University of preliminary and extensive survey and excavations of archaeological, Arizona, Tucson, 1971-1973 paleontological and historic sites in the State of Nevada. He has served as staff archaeologist at the University of Arizona, University Ph.D. program, Anthropology (all but of Colorado and the National Park Service, Western and Southwest dissertation), University of Colorado, Regions. Boulder, 1975 Representative Experience Registrations Pitt Street Bridge Replacement, Jackson, CA. Archaeological study Registered Professional Archaeologist underway with anticipated deliverables including a Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR) and an Archaeological Survey Report (ASR). City of Sutter Creek, Badger Street Bridge Replacement, Sutter Creek. Archaeological and historic architectural studies conducted with deliverables including a Historic Property Survey Report (HPSR), Archaeological Survey Report (ASR) and Historical Resources Evaluation Report (HRER).

Interstate 5-Sunset Hills Boulevard Interchange. Cultural resource inventory, test excavations and evaluation of resources within 34 acre project area, Red Bluff vicinity, Tehama County.

Folsom-Auburn Road Widening Project. Historic Property Survey Report, Archaeological Survey Report and Historic Architectural Survey Report for a proposed road widening project between Folsom and Granite Bay, Sacramento County.

Darling Way Bike Trail Extension. Cultural resources inventory for bike trail extension project in City of Roseville, Placer County.

Riverwalk Pedestrian Trail. Historic Property Survey Report and Archaeological Survey Report for a proposed pedestrian trail in the City of Portola, Plumas County.

Metro Air Park-Interstate 5 Improvements. Cultural resource inventory of a proposed highway interchange near Sacramento Metro Airport, Sacramento County.

Jackson Valley Irrigation District Treated Water Project Phase 2, Elk Grove, CA Cultural resources inventory and evaluation were conducted of approximately 20 miles of proposed pipeline. The deliverable was a technical report designed to meet both CEQA and

Ric Windmiller Consulting Archaeologist 2280 Grass Valley Hwy #205, Auburn, CA • (530) 878-0979 P • (530) 878-0915 F • [email protected]

National Historic Preservation Act, Section 106 guidelines for California Department of Health.

Tracy Multimodal Station, City of Tracy. Cultural resources inventory and evaluation for a planned regional commuter rail service and other mass transportation on five acres in the “Bowtie” area, City of Tracy, San Joaquin County.

North Stockton Pipelines, Presentation at preconstruction meeting at Stockton City Hall, on-site archaeological monitoring of up to three stations during grading and trenching for water and sewer pipelines for North Stockton, San Joaquin County.

Airport Way-Yosemite Avenue Specific Plan. Background studies on archaeological and historical resources in this region of southwest Manteca, San Joaquin County.

Tracy Hills Interim Wastewater Reclamation Facility, Permanent Wastewater Reclamation Facility and Storm Drainage improvements Project. Records search and cultural resources sensitivity assessment for the City of Tracy, San Joaquin County.

City of Manteca General Plan Update. Background study on archaeological and historical resources within the City of Manteca, San Joaquin County.

Lincoln Parkway Connector. Cultural resources inventory of a proposed Highway 65-Del Webb community access at Lincoln, Placer County.

Green Valley Road Improvements Project. Cultural resources inventory of a proposed realignment of Miller Road to create a new intersection with Hidden Acres Drive

Wise Road at North Ravine Bridge Replacement Project. Historic Property Survey Report and Archaeological Survey Report for Caltransfunded, Placer County Department of Public Works project, Auburn area, Placer County.

Mixed Use Suburban Development/Del Webb-Pulte Homes. Archaeological resources inventory and evaluation for federal wetlands permitting and EIR. Project site of 3,000 acres, Tehama County, California

Specific Plan EIRs/West Placer County; City of Manteca; City of Turlock. Cultural resources inventory and assessment of impacts for a 5,000 acre specific plan EIR in Placer County, California; cultural resources overview and analysis of archaeological and historic architectural preservation issues for two specific plans in Manteca, San Joaquin County and an industrial specific plan in Turlock, Stanislaus County, California.

Cultural Resources and Wireless Telecommunications Projects/GeoTrans, Inc. Historic building evaluations, archaeological surveys, construction monitoring for archaeological resources and records searches for wireless telecommunications projects in northern California focusing on the Bay Area (San Francisco and surrounding cities).

Residential Developments/Discovery Builders. Archaeological inventories, evaluations; historic buildings documentation and evaluations on various sites, Contra Costa County, California.

Commercial Development/City of Folsom. Archaeological test excavations, analysis, recovery and reburial of human remains with cooperation of the Sacramento County Coroner, Native American Heritage Commission and the commission’s appointed “most likely descendant.” Folsom, Sacramento County, California.

Cultural Resource Section, EIRs/Pacific Muncipal Consultants. Oak Canyon Ranch EIR, Calaveras County; Northstar Retreat Subdivision EIR, Placer County; Siller Ranch EIR archaeological and paleontological peer review, Placer County, California

Ric Windmiller Consulting Archaeologist 2280 Grass Valley Hwy #205, Auburn, CA • (530) 878-0979 P • (530) 878-0915 F • [email protected]

Michael Brewer GIS Specialist

Education Michael Brewer is a GIS analyst with more than six years experience in GIS Bachelor of Arts, Geographic practices and procedures. He is skilled in developing and editing metadata and Information Systems, Planning, and using location analysis, as well as the use of high resolution imagery. He has Physical Geography, California State expertise in the use of researching spatial data and performing spatial data University, Sacramento, 2006 editing with the use of survey data. He can perform various address matching and geocoding tasks, run definition queries, create maps, and convert geospatial Experience files. In addition he has conducted several spatial analyses for state and local agencies. Mr. Brewer aided in the research, population, and development of the Foothill Associates, GIS Specialist California and National Levee Databases and has conducted urban levee PBS&J/Atkins Global, GIS Analyst II geotechnical evaluations and a floodplain mapping for the California Department of Water Resources and FEMA. CACI / Air Force Real Property Agency, Geographer II Representative Experience California Environmental Protection Biological Resources Assessment Analysis: Mapped biological resources and Agency, Office of Environmental Health constraints utilizing GPS data integration and aerial interpretation for projects and Hazard Assessment, Student Intern such as: County of Sacramento, Department of  Placer Creek Corporate Center, Rocklin, California Long Range Planning, Senior Student  Folsom South Specific Plan, Sacramento County, California Intern  Arcade Creek Park Preserve, Citrus Heights, California

 Jackson Township Specific Plan, Sacramento County, California

Wetland and Habitat Analysis: Compiled data for wetland delineations, wetland impact analysis and habitat impact analysis. Produced graphics for environmental and regulatory permitting reports, CEQA Initial Studies, and Environmental Impact Reports.  Placer Creek Corporate Center, Rocklin, California  Folsom South Specific Plan, Sacramento County, California  Arcade Creek Park Preserve, Citrus Heights, California  Woodside Residential Development, Rocklin, California  Jackson Township Specific Plan, Sacramento County, California  Promontory Village, Sacramento and El Dorado Counties, California  Avalon (Rocklin Business Park), Rocklin, California

Habitat Mitigation and Restoration: Mapped existing habitat conditions, proposed land use impacts and created habitat construction design.  Silva Ranch Restoration Project, Sacramento County, California  Folsom South Specific Plan, Sacramento County, California  Jackson Township Specific Plan, Sacramento County, California

[email protected]

Yurok Trails and Waterways Master Plan, Yurok Tribal levee database showing the location and ownership or Area: Humboldt and Del Norte Counties, CA. Michael more than 10,000 miles of levees within the state. This designed map layouts and feature symbologies for graphics project included the design of an Oracle-SDE geodatabase used in community outreach open house meetings. He to support DWR levee inventory and maintenance activities. managed collected data and created one central PBS&J was responsible for capturing a variety of geodatabase to house all project related spatial data for information including spatial location and engineering and distribution to the Tribe and project team. He researched planning information. This process included gathering data and acquired all relevant spatial data from outside sources from federal, state, and local agencies that are involved for use in analysis and implementation of the project. with levee maintenance. Citrus Heights Creek Corridor Multi-Use Trail Feasibility National Levee Database Inventory, USACE, Locations Study, Citrus Heights, CA. Michael was responsible for all throughout Louisville, Portland, Sacramento, St. Louis, Los map production and maintaining all spatial data. Michael Angeles, Savannah, Mobil, and Little Rock Districts. GIS created field mapbooks for use with site inspections and Specialist. As a result of recent congressional action, the preliminary screening of potential creek corridor trail USACE received the mandate and resources to design and segments. He produced the preliminary screening maps build a National Levee Database (NLD). The NLD will play a used to devise the method of rating creek segments for role in the proposed National Levee Safety Program and the potential corridor trails. Michael was responsible for Inspection of Completed Works Program. It will provide storing, editing, converting, and sharing all spatial data with data for emergency response efforts and assist with the project team. coordination for FEMA’s MapMod and Levee Certification programs. PBS&J performed the pilot inventory program for Hidden Falls Regional Park, Placer County, California. six selected districts and captured approximately 2,878 Michael aided in the design of the map layout and feature miles of levee centerline and profiles as part of the pilot symbologies for trail maps at the park. Using surveyed trail program. The large components of this program include the data he created a layout and template for development of a surveying that captures the levee centerline and profiles trail map and kiosk sign. within each district along with levee features and a Urban Levee Geotechnical Evaluations, California geodatabase that conforms to specifications set forth by Department of Water Resources (DWR), Central Valley, the USACE so that feature geometry can be stored in 3D California. As GIS Analyst, Michael georeferenced and and attributes that apply for sections of each linear feature. entered data into GIS. PBS&J was responsible for creating Mobile GPS Data Collection. Michael created and web-based mapping applications, spatial database design implemented many geodatabases for use with Mobile and management, and organizing onsite data collection handheld GPS devices, tablet PCs, and rugged laptops. teams to locate historical geotechnical data at client sites. Enabled teams to collect data in the field and input directly In response to Hurricane Katrina and the lack of flood into team relational database. protection in the greater central valley region, the Governor initiated an emergency mandated project for DWR to Air Force Real Property Agency (AFRPA) Geographer, perform an analysis of urban project levees. As a member McClellan, California. Created maps for on-site contractors of the geotechnical evaluations team Michael managed and used Environmental and Administrative Records to data collection for the urban levee geotechnical evaluations conform physical and environmental data for the AFRPA’s project including historical levee performance, location of internet mapping service boreholes, and other geotechnical related data. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Floodplain Mapping Contract, DWR, California. Michael Ecotoxicology Program GIS Analyst, Sacramento, served as a GIS Specialist on the GIS web application California. Mr. Brewer used GIS analysis to create development, enterprise database design, and database Impervious Surface Coefficients for the different land use management to improve or enhance floodplain categories in the Dry Creek Watershed. He designed an management practices throughout the state. Tasks included alternative Low Impact site plan for Creek Side Estates a comprehensive levee database showing the location of development implementing on-site storm water treatment more than 10,000 miles of levees, a mapping plan to and preserving public access to the creek. provide detailed and approximate floodplain mapping Department of Planning and Community Development, throughout the state, assisting the state with preparing and GIS Analyst for Sacramento County, California. Michael submitting a post-disaster mitigation grant request, was responsible for creating and maintaining the Habitat awareness mapping to reprioritize the planned production Conservation and Open Space maps for the County. He for 1,000 miles of stream, updating the governor’s assisted the open space team on several new development floodplain management task order, and aiding the state in projects working with a team to map sensitive issues on the developing an outreach program to inform levee districts. development sites such as Swainson’s hawk nesting sites, California Levee Database, DWR, California. As a GIS wetlands, and vernal pools, as well as habitat conservation Specialist, Michael assisted in creating a comprehensive and mitigation sites.

Resume for Michael Brewer Page 2 of 2

Ann Marie Perozzi Graphics Specialist

Education Ann Marie Perozzi, Graphics Specialist, has experience in all phases of graphic Bachelor of Science, Agricultural design from concept through production. She is skilled in creating content for Business, Marketing, California interpretive signage, technical reports, brochures, posters, presentations. She is Polytechnic State University, San Luis knowledgeable of 508 guidelines for developing accessible documents for Obispo, CA, 1999 electronic distribution and web posting. She is proficient with coordinating with clients, photographers and artists, technical staff, sign manufacturers, and Coursework at American River College: printers to produce finished professional pieces. Illustrator, Photoshop, Dreamweaver, PowerPoint, Acrobat Representative Experience Arcade Creek Park Preserve, Citrus Heights, CA. Ann Marie assisted with graphic support of PowerPoint presentations for public meetings, layout of a fundraising catalog, and developed a project website to update the public on the park development process. Henningsen Lotus Park Concept Plan, Lotus, CA. Ann Marie assisted with design of posters, flyers, mailers, and PowerPoint presentations in support of the public outreach effort of this park plan. She also developed and managed an online survey. Citrus Heights Creek Corridor Trail Study, Citrus Heights, CA. Ann Marie assisted with graphic layout of poster presentations and PowerPoint presentations in support of the public outreach process. Lower Feather River Watershed Current Conditions Report and Executive Summary. Ann Marie developed the 230-page multi-chapter report document and 11-page Executive Summary booklet using Adobe InDesign. She developed the layout and coordinated with technical staff for content and graphics. Florin Road Streetscape Enhancement Master Plan, Sacramento, CA. Ann Marie developed the 300-page multi-chapter master plan document using Adobe InDesign. She developed the layout and coordinated with technical staff for content and graphics. Placer Tree Partners Brochures and Booklet. Ann Marie made final edits to (4) four-panel brochures and a 12-page booklet covering topics of tree health, tree care, and tree selection. She coordinated with the printer to produce digital copies. Hazel Meadow Interpretive Signs, Pollock Pines, CA. Ann Marie managed the development of 12 interpretive signs for El Dorado Irrigation District’s Hazel Meadow located at Sly Park Reservoir in El Dorado County. The signs highlighted natural resources, restoration efforts, water quality, and fire break. She developed content, provided graphic design, and coordinated with the client and the sign manufacturer to produce final signs. Auburn Endurance Plaza Interpretive Sign (conceptual), Auburn, CA. Ann Marie developed an interpretive sign for the City of Auburn’s Endurance Plaza. The sign highlighted the 100-mile Tevis Cup (horse race) and Western States Endurance run. She coordinated with a photographer to obtain photos, wrote the content, and provided graphic design.

[email protected]

Natomas Central Fisherman’s Lake Parkway Interpretive Signage, Sacramento, CA. Ann Marie developed a graphic demonstrating the formation of an oxbow lake. She created the vector graphic using Adobe Illustrator and rendered it in Photoshop. Auburn UDA Streetscape Endurance Plaza. Ann Marie rendered a plan of the Auburn Endurance Capital Plaza using Photoshop and wrote a press release for publication in the Auburn Journal’s special insert. UC Davis Alumni Exhibit Poster Presentation. Ann Marie worked with technical staff to provide graphic design of a 36”x48” poster highlighting the Silva Ranch Restoration project. The poster takes the viewer through the planning process, construction, and final results of a 600-acre vernal pool mitigation site. Current Trends and Case Studies in Low Impact Development Presentation Materials. Ann Marie developed a 36” x 48” display poster on Low Impact Development (LID) and included an introduction to LID principles and examples of projects incorporating these principles. The poster was displayed at a booth at the 2010 Current Trends and Case Studies in LID workshop hosted by the American Basin Council of Watersheds. Ann Marie also created a PowerPoint presentation on the Auburn Streetscape project demonstrating Complete Street design and LIS principles. Roseville Earth Festival. Ann Marie designed a variety of display posters and handouts for distribution at the 2010 Roseville Earth Festival. A series of five posters were developed on landscaping with native or drought tolerant plants, waste recycling and reuse, managing stormwater, consuming locally grown food, and reducing chemical usage. The 2011 event included a handout for homeowners on recommended plants that are native or attract butterflies, hummingbirds, or bees. A large 36” x 48” display was created on sustainable landscape design and included an introduction to sustainable principles and examples of projects incorporating these principles. PowerPoint Presentations. Ann Marie has developed PowerPoint Presentation templates, developed first draft content, formatted final versions, produced hardcopy bound presentations, and prepared digital files and hardware for presentations for a number of interviews, stakeholder meetings, and professional presentations.

Resume for Ann Marie Perozzi Page 2 of 2

ATTACHMENT 2

RESOLUTION NO. 14-_

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDERSON AMENDING THE 2013/2014 ADOPTED BUDGET FOR PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 110

WHEREAS, the existing Parks Master Plan was adopted in 1983; and

WHEREAS, the City wishes to update the Parks Master Plan; and

WHEREAS, in order to complete the Parks Master Plan Update the City needs to amend the 2013/2014 adopted budget to reflect a line item change in the Parks Capital Improvement Plan fund 110.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Anderson does hereby direct the Finance Director to amend the adopted 2013/2014 budget as follows:

Account Description Current Proposed Change 110-61L'C-5725 Projects $0 $50,000 $50,000

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Anderson this 6th day of May 2014, by the following vote:

AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:

Debe Hopkins, Mayor of the City Anderson

ATTEST:

Juanita Barnett, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM

May 6, 2014, City Council Meeting

To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council

Through: Jeff Kiser, City Manager

From: Kristen Maze, Development Services Director

Date: May 6, 2014

IsUBJECT

Discuss the data collected during the Community Visioning Process and to review the proposed Mission Statement and Value Statements.

I RECOMMENDATION

The Development Services Director recommends that the City Council:

Discuss information provided from the data collected during the Community Visioning Process and review the draft Mission Statement and Value Statements.

I FISCAL IMP ACT

None

ITEM 8.7b PAGEt 5/6/2014 IDISCUSSION and BACKGROUND

Community Visioning is a collaborative process designed to solicit input from a broad base of community members and stakeholders. The goal is to determine what the community sees as our identity today, but most importantly, what they want it to be in the future. The outcome is articulated in the Mission and Value Statements that will be used in the future for setting budge and CIP priorities, policy considerations, economic development initiatives and improving the City organization.

In January 2014, the City held a Visioning outreach meeting that was designed to engage the community on the desired future of the City of Anderson. Residents were encouraged to get involved and share their opinions. The past four months we have had more than 100 people provide feedback either by attending the visioning outreach meetings or completing a survey.

This visioning process has led to the proposed Mission Statement and the 12 proposed Value Statements. These Statements were drafted and sent out to everyone that attended our Visioning meeting for review and editing. We received about six responses to the Draft Statements plus several email messages that indicated their approval of the Statements. Overall, the City received a great deal of positive input throughout the Visioning process.

!ATTACHMENT

1. Community Visioning City Council Report 2. Visioning Survey Addendum

ITEM 8.7b PAGE2 5/6/2014 ATIACHMENTl

City of Anderson

Community Visioning

City Council Report

1 Table of Contents

About the Briefing Report ...... 3 Visioning Workshop Agenda ...... 4 Visioning Survey ...... 6 Visioning Workshop Summary ...... 8 Proposed Statements ...... l6

2 About this Briefing Report

This report presents the results of our community outreach conducted from January- March 2014. The outreach was designed to engage the community on the desired future for the City of Anderson. The two basic questions were; "What makes Anderson special today" and "What do you see for the future of Anderson"?

The City conducted two meeting to engage the community. The initial meeting/open house held at City Hall introduced a number of ideas to encourage discussion and interest. Residents were encouraged to get involved and share their opinions. Posters were presented with pictures and words that could describe what makes Anderson unique or special today. There were tables and exhibits set up around the room to promote and inspire people to write down their ideas for the City of Andersons future. A survey was handed out to all attendees. Surveys were disturbed through the community as well.

A video and exhibit was shown to introduce the idea of "Piacemaking". This is a grass roots idea designed to get community members engaged and to help Anderson resident with ideas to generate a sense of community attachment through quality public places that they are invested in.

Although our outreach process was simplistic the first community meeting was very well attended and those that were notified about the meeting through our flyers and the local newspaper that were not able to attend, were given the opportunity to participate through the survey.

The follow-up visioning meeting was attended by about 30-40 people. This visioning meeting addressed the visioning workshop summary of our initial outreach meeting. A list of value statements were established and discussed based on the survey results and the responses that were recorded at the initial community outreach session. The group discussed ideas about the mission statement and the values for Anderson . The discussion also included concerns the citizens have about our City regarding safety, code enforcement and the importance of our City's pedestrian and bike trails. There were a lot of great ideas and input at this meeting. Everyone was engaged and interested in following up with comments about the proposed mission statement and value statements that were distributed to everyone for review and comments. We received about a dozen Mission and Value statement comments that have been incorporated below.

3 Anderson Community Visioning Workshop Agenda January 22, 2014 Community Center 6:00

• Introductions

• Session Overview Review Agenda and Materials

• What is a Vision Statement Mission Values Community Influence Goals Strategies

• Placemaking Video

• Discussion and Conclusions Sign up for Stakeholder follow-up meeting(s)

• Refreshements

..

4 Strategic Planning Language

Vision- Where the community wants to be in the future

Mission- What we do and why we do it.

Values - What the organization stands for and what its members believe in

Goals - Statements of how you want the future to be

Strategies - Describes the means to achieve the goals

A strategic planning process involves establishing a vision for the future, clear mission for the organization and identifying the factors affecting the organization, goals, and priority strategies. Listed above is a brief definition ofthe language and elements used during our Visioning process. The visioning is the first phase of the strategic planning process. Once the vision is clear, the mission, values, goals and strategies for the City organization will be developed and complete the strategic planning process. This process has included the mission and values which will allow for the goals and strategies to be established for the City.

Visioning

Visioning is a participatory planning tool that brings various community stakeholders together to develop a shared vision for future development in an identified area, or in this case the City of Anderson. The visioning process will set the foundation for future actions and guide the future planning of the City. Stakeholder participation during this visioning process is critical.

Mission Statement Ingredients

• Positive present tense language

• Qualities that provide the reader with a feeling ofthe City's uniqueness

• Inclusiveness of the City's diverse population

• A depiction of the City's highest standards and excellences of achievement

• A focus on people and quality of life

• Depicts the community values

• Commitment to adopt a statement

5 City of Anderson Visioning Survey

1. What makes the City of Anderson special today?

2. What are some words that describe your vision or desired future for Anderson?

3. Identify (circle) which three themes are MOST important to you. • Public Safety • Celebration of diversity • Traffic mitigation • Local partnerships between • City beautification and code City/schools/local business enforcement • Identifiable gateways into the City • Small Town atmosphere • Increased communication and • Entertainment and retail options engagement from the City • Walkable/bikeable city (sidewalks, crosswalks, bike lanes) • Local business and employment opportunities • Access to open space • Community hub or central gathering place • Planned residential growth • Community events; opportunity to bring people together • Recreation programs • Quality City parks

6 4. Please rate how important you believe each ofthese are to the future of Anderson?

Rating 1 signifies "Not Important" and 5 signifies "Essential"

___Public Safety ___Traffic mitigation ___City beautification and code enforcement ___Small Town atmosphere ___Entertainment and retail options ___ Walkable/bikeable city (sidewalks, crosswalks, bike lanes) _ __Local business and employment opportunities ___ Access to open space ___Community hub or central gathering place ___ Planned residential growth ___ Community events; opportunity to bring people together _ __Recreation programs ___ Quality City parks ___ Celebration of diversity ___Local partnerships between City/schools/local business ___Identifiable gateways into the City ___ Increased communication and engagement from the City

7 Visioning Workshop Summary

On January 22, 2014 the City of Anderson held a Visioning Workshop. This community meeting is a collaborative process designed to solicit input from a broad base of community members and stakeholders. The goal is to determine what the community sees as our identity today, also more importantly, what they want it to be in the future. The outcome will be articulated in Vision and Mission Statements that will be used in the future for setting budget and CIP priorities, policy considerations, economic development initiatives and improving the City organization.

Below is summary of all responses that were recorded at the community outreach session where we discussed our assets and values for Visioning for the future of the City of Anderson.

Citizens • City of Anderson is a small town with big history • The people are friendly and welcoming • City of Anderson has kind and respectful people • Anderson has a diverse age group of community members • The weather is great • Neighbors look out for one another • Anderson is a good size • Affordable services

Local Business - Entertainment/Retail • Need more good quality restaurants (outdoor seating, non-franchise restaurants) • lmprovimg the downtown businesses would help bring in travelers and keep residents from spending money in other cities • Pro-actively recruit businesses to occupy empty commercial space. • Bring Industrial and small manufacturing to the City to create good paying jobs.

8 • Try and avoid attracting more bars and thrifts store and encourage variety and specialty stores in the downtown • Need more retail (hobby shops, healthy stores) • Provide more seasonal community events to engage the citizens and travelers

Public Safety • Police are low staffed • The police department needs to engage more with the citizens • Police are more of enforcers rather than encouraging citizens and cooperating with them. • Need faster police response

Parks • Stop hunting in Anderson River Park • Feral cats in neighborhoods and parks need to be abated. • Improve our horse trails in Anderson River Park • Keep our parks safe • Volonte Park has great walking trails • Volonte Park exercise equipment needs repairs and information signs need to be fixed and maintained. • Volonte maintains a great skate park • Create an organized clean-up crew to keep our Parks free of graffiti and trash. • Anderson River Park maintains a great stage • Focus on the Sacramento River and how it benefits our community. • Preserve our parks natural areas. • Maintain and provide our Anderson River Parks trail system for walking and biking. • Provide a dog park for Anderson • Construct a gazebo in the Anderson River Park for weddings • Connect with Sweat Running Club to host running races in the Park.

Recreation/Physical Spaces • The city provides great, affordable recreation programs for younger kids • Focus on our Anderson histor;y. • Move our museum to East Center Street for better access. • Create more bike lanes around town and pedestrian trails • Need better access for adults and senior swimming • Provide areas to display Community Art

9 • Improve North Street as a gateway to the City by planting more trees on both sides or construct a landscaped median from 1-5 to Highway 273. • Provide better social services in the City • Keep our streets clean and in good condition • Keep our City homeless free • Provide complete sidewalks

Partnerships • City and School should maintain a strong partnership by holding joint meetings with City Council and the School District • Continue to maintain and improve our local library • Museum is a great resource and needs community volunteers to be maintained, the City should engage with the museum. • Partner with the Farmers market to remain in town and open on weekends • Maintain partnership with the Anderson Chamber of Commerce to promote local businesses and build better local business. • Support rehabilitation and transitional housing, collaborative between agencies and non-profits • Support our Teen Center and engage more with the youth, provide mentoring services for our teens

Neighborhoods • Keep our neighborhoods safe and clean • Create a neighborhood beautification award issued by the City Council • Provide taxi or shuttle services.

Survey Results

The City of Anderson presented a survey for everyone that attended the Visioning Workshop and to others in the community that were not available but were interested in being a part of the Visioning process.

Tl:!e Survey incluGie

10 Question 1: What makes the City of Anderson special today? Small town feel, Our Parks and the Sacramento River Citizens of Anderson, are people who care, are friendly and family oriented Safe

Question 2: Describe your vision or desired future for Anderson? Safe, clean Healthy, Connected Supported Cohesive, Inviting, Clean, Accessible, Green Non judgmental, congenial Jobs Education Community and Community Events Full-service

Question 3: Identify three themes that are the Most important to you.

Themes # of respondents % • Public Safety 10 47% • Traffic mitigation 0 0 • City beautification and code enforcement 5 23% • Small Town atmosphere 8 38% • Entertainment and retail options 4 19% • Walkable/bikeable city (sidewalks, crosswalks, bike lanes) 3 14.3% • Local business and employment opportunities 9 42.9% • Access to open space 0 0 • Community hub or central gathering place 1 4.76% • Planned residential growth 0 0 • Community events; opportunity to bring people together 4 19% • Recreation programs 1 4.76% • Quality City parks 3 14.3% • Celebration of diversity 0 0 • Local partnerships between City/schools/local business 5 23.8% • Identifiable gateways into the City 0 0 • Increased communication and ensasement from the Cit~ 2 9.5% Total 55

11 Question 4: Rate the themes that are most important for the future of Anderson.

Priority Rating • Public Safety 3.7 • Traffic mitigation 2.1 • City beautification and code enforcement 2.6 • Small Town atmosphere 3.2 • Entertainment and retail options 3.4 • Walkable/bikeable city (sidewalks, crosswalks, bike lanes) 2.9 • Local business and employment opportunities 3.8 • Access to open space 2.8 • Community hub or central gathering place 2.6 • Planned residential growth 2.9 • Community events; opportunity to bring people together 3.0 • Recreation programs 2.9 • Quality City parks 3.4 • Celebration of diversity 2.2 • Local partnerships between City/schools/local business 3.1 • Identifiable gateways into the City 1.9 • Increased communication and engagement from the Cit~ 2.6

The most general comments received at the Visioning Workshop were related to our parks, and the maintenance, preservation and enhancement of these facilities. A number of comments received were about maintaining and forming partnerships with the School Districts, library, local museum and the Teen Center. There is significant interest in providing local businesses and shopping in the City as well as good quality restaurants so that citizens can shop and eat in town. The other reoccurring theme seems to be keeping our neighborhoods and downtown clean and safe and providing safe and pleasant pedestrian trails throughout the City.

Question 1 focused on what makes Anderson special today, most everyone enjoys Anderson's small town friendly atmosphere, want to keep the City safe and have options available to recreate in our parks and shop, work and eat locally.

Question 2 asked about Anderson's future, once again safety was identified as well as jobs, community and maintaining a healthy environment.

12 To summarize questions 3 and 4, the most important themes were local business and employment opportunities and public safety. Small town atmosphere is important as a close third, a number of people made it known that the small town friendly atmosphere is what makes Anderson special today.

Question 4 people rated quality parks and entertainment and retail options as a close third to local business and employment opportunities and public safety.

Anderson is a City of opportunity in which we want to preserve our safe, small town, friendly atmosphere. The City of Anderson offers a pedestrian friendly small town, with beautiful parks and recreation opportunities.

Vision: Where the community wants to be in the future

Possible Vision Statements:

• Provide public services and infrastructure for an attractive and safe community. • Support and maintain our beautiful parks and riverfront properties. • Provide the highest quality of service with the resources available by promoting innovation and flexibility to meet the changing needs in our community, • We are concerned about our naturat historic and economic and aesthetic resources and endeavor to enhance their sustainability for future generations • Provide effective and fiscally responsible municipal services in a manner which promotes this high standard of community life.

Mission: What we do and why we do it

Possible Mission Statements:

The mission of the City of Anderson is to partner with our community to deliver services, preserve, protect and enhance the quality of life and plan for the future

The City of Anderson is a safe and vibrant community and a great place in which to work live and play, that mffers residents arrc.dl fuusinesses growth and opportunity.

13 PLACE MAKING

14 PUBLIC ART,...----

Do you have an idea for a potential site? Indoors or outdoors, we welcome all suggestions and appreciate your help!

15 Proposed Statements

City of Anderson Mission Statement

The mission of the City of Anderson is to partner with and engage our community to provide services/ preserve our small town atmosphere/ protect our parks/ enhance the quality of life and plan for the future. The City of Anderson strives to maintain a safe/ beautiful/ vibrant community and a great place to work live and play/ that offers residents and businesses growth and opportunity.

City of Anderson Value Statements

Provide quality public service/ infrastructure and resources for an attractive and safe community while promoting innovation and flexibility to meet the changing needs of our community.

Support and maintain our beautiful parks and riverfront properties.

Continue to encourage our natural historic/ economic and aesthetic resources and endeavor to enhance their sustainability for future generations.

Support a community that is pedestrian friendly.

Provide effective and fiscally responsible municipal services in a manner which promotes a high standard of community life.

Work in partnership with the community to make Anderson a safe and beautiful City to work and enjoy.

Create a downtown that is clean and enjoyable to walk/ shop and conduct business.

Embrace the surrounding communities that help make Anderson a vibrant and thriving City.

Provide a municipal government that is honest/ transparent/ dependable/ inventive/ creative/ economical and ethical.

Foster a feeling of community spirit and identity as well as promotes a sense of full citizen participation/ guaranteeing an opportunity for everyone to share in the activities/ duties/ responsibilities and benefits of the City.

Promotes buildings and public infrastructure development that are practical/ aesthetically pleasing and in harmony with the environment and surrounding landscape.

16 Welcomes and accommodates the needs and desires of current residents, future residents and visitors, where the spirit of volunteerism and neighbors work together for the common good to build a strong and vibrant community.

17 ATTACHMENT 2

Visioning Survey Addendum

Following our Visioning Workshop conclusion, the Development Service Department received 57 surveys from the Anderson Police Department. Although this effort is appreciated and valuable, it was submitted after our public outreach process therefore I am including the results of the surveys as an addendum.

In summary these 57 surveys do not differ much from the results attained during our outreach workshop with the exception of theme ratings which indicate that second to public safety the small town atmosphere and local business and employment opportunities rank highly important for this group. These rankings make since because these surveys were taken at local service clubs (Anderson Kiwanis, Rotary and Anderson Explodes) which generally include local business owners and professionals.

The Survey included four questions, two questions asked what was special about Anderson and to describe the vision or future of Anderson. Question 3 and 4 presented themes that are most important. Below is summary of all responses that were recorded in the surveys.

Survey Results

Question 1: What makes the City of Anderson special today? Small town feel, Our Parks, open space Citizens of Anderson, are people who care, are friendly and family oriented Safe Government partners Community involvement/events

Question 2: Describe your vision or desired future for Anderson? Safe, clean Jobs Planned growth Community pride Green space Question 3: Identify three themes that are the Most important to you.

Themes # of res~ondents % • Public Safety 38 71% • Traffic mitigation 1 1.8% • City beautification and code enforcement 10 19% • Small Town atmosphere 28 53% • Entertainment and retail options 5 9.4% • Walkable/bikeable city (sidewalks, crosswalks, bike lanes) 7 13% • Local business and employment opportunities 23 43% • Access to open space 3 5.6% • Community hub or central gathering place 2 3.7% • Planned residential growth 4 7.5% • Community events; opportunity to bring people together 5 9.4% • Recreation programs 3 5.6% • Quality City parks 15 28% • Celebration of diversity 0 0 • Local partnerships between City/schools/local business 9 17% • Identifiable gateways into the City 0 0 • Increased communication and engagement from the Cit~ 3 5.6% Total 53

Question 4: Rate the themes that are most important for the future of Anderson.

Priority Rating • Public Safety 4.6 • Traffic mitigation 3.2 • City beautification and code enforcement 3.7 • Small Town atmosphere 3.9 • Entertainment and retail options 3.2 • Walkable/bikeable city (sidewalks, crosswalks, bike lanes) 3.4 • Local business and employment opportunities 4.4 • Access to open space 3.1 • Community hub or central gathering place 2.8 • Planned residential growth 3.2 • Community events; opportunity to bring people together 3.3 • Recreation programs 3.2

2 Vision Survey Addendum • Quality City parks 3.9 • Celebration of diversity 2.8 • Local partnerships between City/schools/local business 3.7 • Identifiable gateways into the City 2.8 • Increased communication and engagement from the City 3.4

To summarize questions 3 and 4, the most important themes were local business and employment opportunities and public safety. Small town atmosphere is important as a close third, a number of people made it known that the small town friendly atmosphere is what makes Anderson special today.

Question 4 people rated quality public safety and local business and employment opportunities as a close second. The third highest rating appears to be quality parks and our small town atmosphere once again.

3 Vision Survey Addendum A ITACHMENT 1

RESOLUTION NO. 14-_

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDERSON AMENDING THE 2013/2014 ADOPTED BUDGET FOR PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 110

WHEREAS, the existing Parks Master Plan was adopted in 1983; and

WHEREAS, the City wishes to update the Parks Master Plan; and

WHEREAS, in order to complete the Parks Master Plan Update the City needs to amend the 2013/2014 adopted budget to reflect a line item change in the Parks Capital Improvement Plan fund 110.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Anderson does hereby direct the Finance Director to amend the adopted 2013/2014 budget as follows:

Account Description Current Proposed Change 110-61JG"X-5725 Projects $0 $50,000 $50,000

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Anderson this 6th day of May 2014, by the following vote:

AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:

Debe Hopkins, Mayor of the City Anderson

ATTEST:

Juanita Barnett, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM

May 6, 2014 City Council Meeting

To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council

Through: Jeff Kiser, City Manager

From: Michael L. Johnson, Chief of Police

Date: May 6, 2014

IsUBJECT

Anderson Police Department 2013 year-end report: Annual Report of Crime Statistics for 2013

I RECOMMENDATION

The Chief of Police recommends that the City Council:

Accepts and files the Annual Report of Crime Statistics for 2013.

IFISCAL IMPACT

None.

I DISCUSSION and BACKGROUND

The Anderson Police Department has published its Annual Report of Crime Statistics for 2013. The Annual Report gives the City Council and community a look at the criminal activity reported to the Department in 2013.

ITEM 8.8 PAGE 1 5/6/2014 In 2008, the City experienced the largest single year crime increase (30.43%) in the history of the Anderson Police Department. Upon examining our reporting system and statistical data mechanism it was determined that the Department was failing to adequately capture all the necessary factual crime information, especially evident in the year 2011. The result has proven to represent a categorical significant increase. This change in our reporting mechanism, coupled with the phenomenon imposed by the State of California of early parolee releases into our county has detrimentally impacted our community.

When comparing the 2012 to 2013 reporting years, there are some encouraging statistical data. The City of Anderson saw an overall decrease (16.7%) in violent crime. Specifically, robbery, rape, and assaults show a decrease in total number of incidents.

Domestic violence incidents decreased from 158 to 76 in 2013, down 51.9%. This is the single most significant statistic (moved in a positive direction) over the past two years. In 2012 we saw a 38.9% decrease.

Theft related offenses, especially vehicle theft, have drastically increased (accounting for 18.3% of this year's overall Part 1 crime statistical increases). Larceny is up 22.37%, vehicle theft is up 27.7%, and burglary has slightly increased, .06%.

Traffics numbers overall showed a minimal change in statistical data. There was 1 fatal collision in the City of Anderson in 2013. Property damage only collisions were up 1.59%, while injury collisions were down 11.12%.

In summary, the City of Anderson felt the impacts of an increased crime rate this past year, especially the theft related categories. Important to note is that total calls for service and total number of incidents are both down from last year's totals. This means the officers went to less calls for service and handled less incidents than in 2012, but their workloads were impacted far more. We are operating at bare minimum public safety staffing levels. However, we are doing a better job of thoroughly documenting reported crimes and are handling more significant calls for service. Overall, our community is coming together and forming partnerships that are positively impacting are ability to resolve issues.

In addition to tonight's City Council review, the 2013 Annual Report will be available for review by members of the community at the Anderson Police Department, the City Clerk's Office in Anderson City Hall, Anderson Chamber of Commerce, the Anderson Branch of the Shasta County Library, and on the City's website.

IATTACHMENT

Annual Report of Crime Statistics for 2013

ITEM Jh.§. PAGE2 5/6/2014

ANDERSON

POLICE

2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS

MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF OF POLICE………………………………………………….... 2

OVERVIEW………………………………………………………………………………….. 3

VIOLENT CRIME……………………………………………………………………………. 5

PROPERTY CRIME……………………………………………………………………….…. 6

GENERAL ARREST STATISTICS………………………………………………………….…. 7

TRAFFIC STATISTICS……………………………………………………………………...... 8

CITATIONS………………………………………………………………………………….. 9

GANGS/DRUGS/YOUTH……………………………………………………………...... 10

MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF OF POLICE

The officers at the Anderson Police Department embrace the proactive and aggressive law enforcement model and continue to improve the quality of life for our community. Over the past year we have worked hard to improve relationships and form partnerships with our neighborhoods, businesses, and citizens. Innovative approaches to crime prevention and investigations have yielded results for our city.

Crime is on the rise in the United States and particularly in California. Small businesses, corporations, big cities, and small towns are all feeling the pressures of the economic downturn, paralleled by the influx of criminals released into our communities. Despite the challenges of reduced staffing levels, the men and women of this agency remain dedicated and optimistic. We find new ways to cope with the hurdles that this State and Federal Government has laid on our door step. The sworn officers, support staff, and volunteers of the Anderson Police Department discharge their duties with a positive approach and a lasting dedication to maintain our small town atmosphere and north state way of life.

We are currently staffed at 15 sworn peace officers, 4 support staff, 2 community service officers, and 9 volunteer patrol members. The Department was able to sustain a part time school resource officer this past year, however, that position was funded primarily through our overtime budget. We assigned one officer to the Shasta County SWAT team and another officer to the Shasta County hostage negotiation team. The bike patrol team continues to work special events and deploy regularly in the community. We also boast the hard work of our experienced detective, the traffic officer, the field training officers, and the child abduction response team officer.

The K9 Unit program has proven to be a huge success for the community. In October 2013 our new K9 “Aero” and his handler were certified for patrol and narcotics. The team hit the ground running and immediately made several narcotics and cash seizures. Aero recently further proved his worth in a dangerous confrontation by apprehending a combative felon who had assaulted the officer during the arrest. We are grateful to the community for the fund raising efforts to acquire this four-legged officer.

Communications and information dissemination has drastically improved over this past year. The public information officer, the sergeants, and the lieutenant have done an excellent job in improving media relations and getting out information in a timely manner. The use of social media outlets is an avenue that has allowed the Anderson Police Department to reach more of the general public. Our intentions are to further improve by starting up our own website this next year.

We are fortunate to have such a collaborative city of involved and caring citizens. Your police department is committed to continued improvement, transparency, and professional service.

Michael L. Johnson

2013 ANNUAL REPORT PAGE 2 OF 10 ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT

Chief of Police OVERVIEW

This annual report provides a look at crime within our community. There are many things that can contribute to the crime rate, including:

 The economy,  Changes in population,  Over-crowding and early releases from county jails,  The inability to hold offenders accountable due to the over-crowding,  The unemployment rate, and  Police staffing.

Preventing crime, apprehending criminals, protecting life and property, and preserving the quality of life is the priority of the Anderson Police Department. Police department personnel work diligently employing several programs and projects such as: Community Oriented Policing, Problem Oriented Policing projects, Neighborhood Watch, Volunteer Patrol, Shasta Anti-Gang Enforcement, and the Shasta Interagency Narcotic Task Force.

In 2013, the City of Anderson experienced a 7.1% average increase in total Part I crimes. There are seven categories of Part I Crimes: Homicide, Rape, Robbery, Assault, Burglary, Larceny, and Motor Vehicle Theft. The following table provides the total number of Part I Crimes reported for the past five years:

FIVE-YEAR COMPARISON TOTAL PART I CRIMES

1200

1000 955 892 838 837.6 812 800 691

600

400

200

0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 AVERAGE

2013 ANNUAL REPORT PAGE 3 OF 10 ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT

Below is an expanded summary of Part I Crimes in Anderson, comparing 2012 to 2013.

PART I CRIMES 2012 2013 % CHANGE RAW CHANGE

HOMICIDE 0 0 0 0

RAPE 6 8 3.34% 2

ROBBERY 11 9 -18.18% -2

ASSAULT 265 218 -17-73% -47

VIOLENT CRIME 282 235 -16.7% -47

BURGLARY 145 146 .06% 1

LARCENY 371 454 22.37% 83

VEHICLE THEFT 94 120 27.7% 26

PROPERTY CRIME 610 720 18.03% 110

TOTAL PART I CRIMES 892 955 7.1% 63

OTHER STATISTICS 2012 2013 % CHANGE RAW CHANGE

TOTAL DUI’S 63 40 -36.5% -23

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 158 76 -51.9% -82

In 2013, Anderson police responded to a total of 18,844 calls for service and handled 23,423 incidents.

A very positive statistical fact is that Domestic Violence showed a significant decrease. The decrease in DV may be attributed to the marketable increase of information, targeted social service intervention, and domestic educational outreach programs in Shasta County over the past year.

Not all of the crimes reported are Part I Crimes. Examples of other types of calls for service include: Prowler Calls, Abandoned Vehicles, Lost Children, Missing Persons, Traffic Hazards, Speeding Vehicles, Traffic Collisions, Fraud, Financial Crimes, Identify Theft, Annoying Telephone Calls, Drunk Drivers, Citizen Assists, Disturbances, Medical Aid Calls, Incomplete 9- 1-1’s, Extra Patrols, and many more. All of these calls for service create an incident of which Anderson Police Department officers, community service officers, public safety dispatchers, or public safety records clerks respond to assist the citizens and/or visitors to the City of Anderson.

2013 ANNUAL REPORT PAGE 4 OF 10 ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT

VIOLENT CRIME

In 2013, there were 235 cases of Violent Crime (Homicide, Rape, Robbery, and Assaults) compared to 282 in 2012, a decrease of 16.7%.

FIVE-YEAR COMPARISON VIOLENT CRIMES

350 367

302 300 282 285.2 273

250 235

200

150

100

50

0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 AVERAGE

2013 ANNUAL REPORT PAGE 5 OF 10 ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT

PROPERTY CRIME

In 2013, there were 720 Property Crime cases involving Burglary, Larceny, and Motor Vehicle Theft, compared to 610 cases in 2012; an increase of 18.03%.

FIVE-YEAR COMPARISON PROPERTY CRIMES

800 720 700

610 600 552.4 504 510 500 418 400

300

200

100

0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 AVERAGE

2013 ANNUAL REPORT PAGE 6 OF 10 ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT

GENERAL ARREST STATISTICS

The below arrest statistics include information on all people arrested in 2013 for all crimes, including, but not limited to, Part I Crimes.

TOTAL ARRESTS – ALL CRIMES 2012 2013 CHANGE RAW CHANGE

ARRESTS (ADULT & JUVENILE) 1,448 1,391 -3.9% -57

FIVE-YEAR COMPARISON ARRESTS

1600 1460 1448 1391 1400 1302.4

1200 1104 1109

1000

800

600

400

200

0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 AVERAGE

ADULT AND JUVENILE CASES SUBMITTED TO THE SHASTA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE

In 2013, 1,111 cases were submitted to the Shasta County District Attorney’s Office for review compared to 1,193 in 2012. Additionally, in 2013, 76 cases were submitted to the Shasta County Juvenile Probation Department for review compared to 115 in 2012.

2013 ANNUAL REPORT PAGE 7 OF 10 ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT

TRAFFIC STATISTICS

The Department recently assigned a part-time traffic officer. However, this officer is still responsible for routine patrol shift duties. He is not qualified, trained, or licensed to operate our motor unit. The burden of keeping up on traffic related grants and enforcement has fallen primarily on this officer. Through the acquisition of grant funding, the Department participated in Driving Under the Influence Checkpoints and Driving Under the Influence Saturation Patrols.

COLLISIONS 2012 2013 CHANGE RAW CHANGE

PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY 63 64 1.59% 1

INJURY COLLISIONS 27 24 -11.12% -3

FATAL COLLISIONS 0 1 100% 1

TOTAL COLLISIONS 90 89 -1.12% -1

FIVE-YEAR COMPARISON TRAFFIC COLLISIONS

140 130 126

120 106

100 95 90 89

80

60

40

20

0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 AVERAGE

2013 ANNUAL REPORT PAGE 8 OF 10 ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT

CITATIONS

The number of traffic citations written in 2013 slightly decreased from 2012.

CITATIONS ISSUED 2012 2013 CHANGE RAW CHANGE

ALL CITATIONS 505 417 -17.43% -88

FIVE-YEAR COMPARISON CITATIONS

1760 1800

1600

1400

1200

1000 835 803 800

600 498 505 417 400

200

0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 AVERAGE

2013 ANNUAL REPORT PAGE 9 OF 10 ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT

GANGS/DRUGS/YOUTH

The Department partners with the Shasta Anti-Gang Enforcement (SAGE) task force and actively participates in the Youth Violence Prevention Council (YVPC) to mitigate gang influence and impacts to our community. The Anderson Police Department detective is our SAGE liaison and is dedicated to proactive operations throughout the county. The detective participates in almost every SAGE related detail and event. One Anderson city council member and the Anderson chief of police sit on the board of YVPC.

The Anderson Police Department is dedicated to war on drugs in Shasta County. The Department was unable to commit a sworn officer to the Shasta Interagency Narcotics Task Force (SINTF) again this year due to staffing shortages. However, the Department did continue its administrative participation with the chief sitting on the board and the Anderson finance director allocated to the SINTF financial bookkeeping duties. Anderson officers and the APD K9 Unit routinely assist SINTF agents in search warrant services and investigations.

The Anderson Police Department continues to increase its presence and participation in the community. Personnel are active in school related events, prevention programs, and neighborhood intervention. This Department realizes the investment in our youth and the long term benefits to our community when we can help make a difference with the kids’ lives.

2013 ANNUAL REPORT PAGE 10 OF 10 ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT

AGENDA ITEM May 6, 2014, City Council Meeting

David Durette, Deputy Public Works Director

To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the Anderson City Council

Through: Jeff Kiser, City Manager

From: David Durette, Deputy Public Works Director

Date: May6, 2013

IsUBJECT Approval of the Parcel Map 14-02 for Skyview Plaza.

IRECOMMENDATION

The Deputy Public Works Director recommends that the City Council:

Adopt a Resolution Approving the Final Parcel Map PM14-02 for Skyview Plaza and accepting the dedication of offered five foot (5') wide public service easement based on Planning Commission Resolution 14-02 approval of the Tentative Parcel Map.

I FISCAL IMP ACT

This action should not create any fiscal impact on the City.

ITEM s .9 PAGEl 5/6/2014 IDISCUSSION AND BACKGROUND

On February 24, 2014 the Planning Commission approved the Skyview Plaza Tentative Parcel Map 14-02 by Resolution 14-02. The proposed project consists of a tentative parcel map for the division of 10.09 acres, into four (4) parcels that range in size of 1.14 acres to 4.41 acres. The lot is a relatively flat vacant parcel with direct frontage on Rhonda Road, Pleasant Hills Road and Highway 273. Although the 10 acres is one legal parcel it is divided by Pleasant Hills Drive. This parcel is commonly known as the "Wilms Commercial Parcel" adjacent to the Anderson Market Place development.

Typically parcel maps do not need council approval prior to recordation. Since there is an offer of dedication of a five foot wide public service easement (PSE) behind the right of way on each parcel, the parcel map must be brought before city council and approved to accept the offered easement. A five foot wide PSE is standard. This allows room utilities such as gas, electricity and phone lines to be installed behind the City's sidewalk.

The proposed final parcel map for PM 14-02 has been reviewed by the City Engineer and the Development Services Director. The City Engineer has determined that the subdivision is substantially in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act.

The City Engineer has examined the final map and determined that the proposed map is substantially the same as it appeared on the tentative map that was approved in February 2014 and that all the provisions of the Anderson Municipal Code Chapter 16, Final Maps­ Procedures and Contents and the Subdivision Map Act are technically correct and have been satisfied.

IATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution 2. Skyview Parcel Map 14-02 3. Approved Tentative Parcel Map TPM 14-02

ITEM s.9 PAGE2 5/6/2014 ATTACHMENT 1

RESOLUTION NO. 14-_

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDERSON AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE DEDICATION FROM JMA VINEYARDS, LLC, TO THE CITY OF ANDERSON FOR A FIVE FOOT (5') WIDE PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 14-02

BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anderson to accept the dedication of a five foot wide public service easement located behind the property lines fronting public right of way, as shown on Parcel Map 14-02.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Anderson this 6th day of May, 2014, by the following vote:

AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:

Debe Hopkins, Mayor ATTEST:

Juanita Barnett, City Clerk AT'I'AChNENT 2

OWNER'S STATEMENT

WE HEREBY CERTiFY THAT WE ARE THE OWNER(S) OR HAVE SOME RIGHT, TITLE OR RECORDER'S STATEM ENT INTEREST IN AND TO THE REAL PROPERTY INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION AS FILED THIS DAY OF - 2014, AT _ _ .M. IN SHOWN UPON THIS MAP. AND THAT WE ARE THE ONLY PERSONS WHOSE CONSENT ____ ------· _____ BOOK __ _ _ OF PARCEL MAPS AT PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF SHARRAH IS NECESSARY TO PASS CLEAR TITLE TO SAID PROPERTY, AND WE CONSENT TO -- -- THE PREPARATION AND RECORDATION OF SAID MAP AND SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN DUNLAP SAWYER, INC. WITHIN THE DISTlNCllVE BORDER. AND HEREBY DEDICATE ALL PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP. FEE ------MORGAN JMA VINEYARDS COMMERCIAL, LLC, A CALIFORNIA liMITED LIABILITY COMPANY LESLIE SHASTA COUNTY RECORDER

MANAGING MEMBER BY DEPUTY ------I ACKNO W! EPGMENT TAX CO!! ECTOR'S STATEMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA I, LORI J. SCOTT, TAX COLLECTOR OF SHASTA COUNTY HEREBY CERTIFY THAT COUNTY OF SHASTA THERE ARE NO LIENS FOR UNPAID STATE, COUNTY, OR LOCAL TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST THE LAND INCLUDED IN THE WITHIN SUBDIVISION OR ON ------, BEFORE ME, ______AGAINST ANY PART THEREOF EXCEPT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS NOT YET ------• NOTARY PUBLIC, PERSONALLY APPEARED PAYABLE AGAINST SAID SUBDIVISION OR ANY PAR T THEREOF, AND THAT THIS ------• WHO PROVED TO ME ON THE BASIS OF CERTIFICATE DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY ASSESSMENT OF ANY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO BE THE PERSON($) WHOSE NAME(S) IS/ARE THE BONDS OF WHICH HAVE NOT YET BECOME A LIEN AGAINST SAID LAND OR ANY PART THEREOF. SUBSCRIBED TO THE 'W'ITH!N INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOYIILEDGED TO ME THAT SI AP HE/SHE/TH EY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THEIR AUTHORIZED CAPAC!TY(!ES), TE M SCALE: NTS AND THAT BY HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE($) ON THE INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON($), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH THE PERSON($) ACTED. EXECUTED THE DATED: ------INSTRUM ENTS.

I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF BY: ------TAx-COLCE:CTOR.- COUN-TY- OFSHAS TA - ­ SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT CALIFORNIA THAT THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT. sTATE OF CALIFORNIA THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTiON AND IS WITNESS MY HAND------­ BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE NAME (PRINTl------AT THE REQUEST OF JMA VINEYARDS, INC IN MARCH 2014. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE MY COMMISSION EXPIRES ------PI ANN!NG DIRFCJOR'S STATEMENT CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, THAT THE SURVEY IS TRUE AND COMPLETE AS SHOWN AND THAT THE MONUMENTS ARE OF I HEREBY CERTIFY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP, THAT THE PARCELS MY COMMISSION NO. ------THE CHARACTER AND HAVE BEEN SET IN THE POSITIONS INDICATED ------SHOWN HEREON ARE SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS THEY APPEARED ON THE AND WILL BE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. TENTATIVE MAP, AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF AS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF ANDERSON PLANNING COMMISSION ON FEBRUARY 24, 2014 STATEMENT OF Oy.a.!ERS LIABILITY OR RESPONSIBILITY KRiST6J-MAZE.- PLANNING-OiRECTOR------ciTY OF ANDERSON WE UNDERSTAND THAT li IS OUR RESPONSIBILITY, AS PROPERTY OWNERS, TO JOSH R. MARTIN PLS #8184 FULFILL THE COND!TJONS OF APPROVAL AS SET FORTH IN PARCEL MAP NO. 14- 02. DATE 46. SEWER AND WATER LINES ARE TO BE EXTENDED, SIZED AND INSTALLED AT GRADES TO PERMIT THE ORDERLY EXTENSION OF SERVICE TO ALL ABUTTING PROPERTY AND TRIBUTARY AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY'S MASTER SEWER AND WATER PLANS.

51. All ON-SITE PUBLIC WATER EXTENSIONS NECESSARY TO SERVE THE DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE PLACED IN A MINIMUM 15-FOO T WIDE PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT. CITY C!ERK STATEMENT I, JUANITA BARNETT, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY ANDERSON, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 53. THE DEVELOPER SHALL NOTE THAT PUBLIC/MUNICIPAL UTILITY COMPANIES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANDERSON APPROVED MAY HAVE TO BE REIMBURSED FOR All COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RELOCATION THE PARCEL MAP NO. 14-0 2 ON ------• 2014 AND ACCEPTED ON OF THEIR FACILITiES NECESSITATED BY THE CONSTRUCTiON OF THE IMPROVEMENTS BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC, PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENTS AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP IN CONFORMITY WITH THE TERMS OF THE OFFER OF DED!CA T!ON. REQUIRED AS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT. - @I::

60. PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION OR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPAN CY, FULL FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ACCORDING TO THE CITY'S JUANITA BARNETT. CITY CLERK CONSTRUCTiON STANDARDS AS REQUIRED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. OF THE CITY OF ANDERSON, COUNTY OF SHASTA STATE OF CALIFORNIA 61. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT ALL APPLICABLE CITY IMPACT FEES SHALL BE PAID. SKYVI EW PLAZA PARCEL MAP 14- 02 LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST ONE- QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST, SHASTA COUNTY. IN THE CITY OF CIJY JREASURER CERTIFICATE CITY ENGINEER'S STATEM[NT ANDERSON, SHASTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA !, LIZ COTTRELL. CITY TREASURER OF THE CITY OF ANDERSON, HEREBY CERTIFY I HEREBY STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THIS MAP AND THAT THE SUBDIVISION THAT THERE ARE NO LIENS FOR UNPAID CITY OR MUNICIPAL TAXES OR SPECIAL SHOWN HEREON IS SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME AS IT APPEARED ON THE TENTATIVE FOR ASSESSMENTS AGAINST THE LAND INCLUDED WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION OR AGAINST MAP, IF REQUIRED. AND ANY APPROVED ALTERATIONS THEREOF: THAT ALL

ANY PART THEREOF, EXCEPT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS NOT YET PAYABLE PROVISIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA ~SUBDIVISIONMAP ACT~AND LOCAL ORDINANCES JMA VINEYARDS AGAINST SAID SUBDIVISION OR ANY PART THEREOF, AND THAT THIS CERTIFICATE APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE MAP , HAVE BEEN COMMERCIAL, LLC DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY ASSESSMENT OF ANY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, THE BONDS COMPLIED WITH; AND THAT I AM SATISFIED THAT THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY OF WHICH HAVE NOT YET BECOME A LIEN AGAINST SAID LAND OR ANY PART CORRECT. BY THEREOF. SHARRAH DUN LAP SAWYER, INC. CITY TRE ASURER-:-ClTY- OFANDERSON______DATE______JIM ELKINS, CITY ENGINEER DATED C i1·il En:.;irw .. ri ng o Wnd PIJnning o Surwy in)\ & M ~ppin;: SHASTA COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORN IA CITY OF ANDERSON L.u-.d'~''P"Arc hitr.ctu r,.. o p,.,, .,nl.>lion Gr.ophic< RCE 31640 6590 lm.kh.,~dOriw , Rt:dd inf!, CA 9600.::

530.~~1.179.!_,, ;,.,. • 530 .!21.83Mlf.,x • [email protected]''"")\in .... rin)\ <"Um

DATE: SCALE: 1"•100 ' SHEET 1 OF 2 LINE TABLE CURVE TABLE RADIAL TABLE

UNE BEARING LENGTH CURVE RADIUS DELTA LENGTH RADIAL BEARING

L1 N89'10'15"W 43.45' C1 342,00' 42'48'50" 255.56' R13 S32'59'07"W

L2 S62'21'41"W 30.65' C2 258.00 ' 26'57'35" 121.40' R14 S9'49'43"E FND 5/8" REBAR W/ ALUM. CAP MKD LS 4975, L3 S27"08' 42"W 35.37' C3 30.00' 100'00'51" 52.37 ' R15 N1T0 7'52"E 35 PM 71 SHOWS CL MONUMENT. ACCEPTED AS L4 S52"50'06"W 42.00' C4 447.00' 35'12'59" 274.74 ' R16 N44'18'3YW CL POSITION PER 35 PM 71

L5 N3T09 '52"W 122.37' C5 100.00' 22"09'58" 38.69' R17 N82'56'12~E / L6 S621)0'QO"W 34.41' C6 258.00' 26'35'00" 119.70' R18 N47"27'26~W PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT / :-..... !;!ASIS QF 6EARIN(Z - - PER 2006-0060763 BASED UPON TWO FOUND MONUMENTS L7 N69'10'15~W71.43' C7 234.00' Y08'5t" 12.85' / " ALONG 'THE WEST UNE OF PARCEL 8 AS / gl~ WN / \ SHO IN BOOK 18 OF PARCEL MAPS AT LB N62'51't8~W 20.11 ' CB 30.00' 105'23'52" 55.19' PAGE 25, TAKEN AS NORTH 00'50'03~ EAST. FREEWAY /(S 32"39'15" E) I g§? \ L9 N89'49'07"E 14.16' C9 442.00 ' 55'49'30" 430.65' MAINTENANCE S32'39'15"E WAIVER PER 13.3. 04' /___ _ «/">~I~\ L10 S6 2'21'41"W 29.95 ' C10 558.00 ' 35'12'59" 342.97' ~38 OR 329 \ ~ooy,, 10/ / L11 S27'08'42"W 39.03' C11 30.00' 90'00'00" 47.12' / 1 \ 'q,-"s.''~-/. ;s I L12 N62'51'18"W 30.46' C12 358.00' 63'41'21" 397.95' '?o~',~ o. \. :>6'0' ~ ~fe-y C13 61'09'57" 275.43' 258.00' 5' PSE / " ..._ _ N_!...- / C14 20.00' 90'00'00" 31.42' / DETAIL A / 1"= 20' PARCEL 1 1.65 ACRES .I.EI2E.i'!D_ ' ?AR::::::~. .:. / 5 PSE ' ;... ' .'5:- ?;.; ~-~ ., FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED / 1-1~,_;:'- \ ·/ ~ .<>~' o" 5' PSE / ·'"'"'' 1 i " ""' "' ' / FOUND 5/ 8" REBAR W/ ALUM y_\Gi' o 10' PSE PER ' 0o_,~.>~ CAP MKO LS 4975 PER 35 PM 71 / \l s- ~;~ o~ 2oo7-oo2o7ss ~ 'o ~<(~~ 0 SET 5/8" REBAR W/ ALU M CAP £> 6 ~'i.~s'=:..,, 0? o.> S' :-... MKD LS 8184 UNLSESS / "•' ;,, 1;; • -' "'s'~-,cc~so' "'o "'"'<>.p 6 •s \o•'-•s s0"'~o~o<~. ~ :0' OTHERWISE NOTED ·oo.,_ ooo '<' ,Gv- ,;1 ~ ~tl / .,;..; s'-.,;ogdoos'-~oi""';o o "'~s<~. "':: H RECORD DATA PER 18 PM 25

,s'1~C:SO RIGH T OF "':: l 5: H RECORD DATA PER 35 PM 71 AND MEASURED ACCESS PER 5' PSE PER- R&M RECORD AND MEASURED BEARING AND/OR DISTANCE / or6 / 137 OR 450 2007 - 0020788 P~" .p-... "'J-o'O· ~ 00> P5E PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT I:-p ''RELINQUISHMENT OF "'·'t,_ PARCEL 3 .,.,"'"' we WITNESS CORNER RIGHT OF ACCESS 4.41 ACRES SET BRASS TAG z6 ~ PER 137 OR 450 'b. / <" IN CONCRETE -\ RESTRICTED ACCESS RIGHTS AS NOTED MKD LS 8184 ~ / , PARCEL 4 s .o· we\

,1-•?~-< C14 2.89 ACRES ~~ WIUc cAocMcN' ~- 1 PER 10 SEE'I fPSE_.. / 2007-00207~8

1 "' 10' 1'<10E w~t~R~~€ ~~~~~~~L~~R1 s7 c''- /' 0 DETAIL. A \ \ / /\ "' 6~S~~6N~ND1927 OR 205 6 /. . \ 'oo oo /' _ ------: :. -: : - :: : :::: 0 o: 1' NON- ACC\ ESS STRIP .•J' ,P " "~~:::::,------. -" : • PER 18 PM 25 SKYVIEW PLAZA 87 25 FOUND,/ CE oo s'1'iz7 ~7PER 18 PM '"'25 ' """ ~~~\»c ~ - FU"'·"'TURE - - -"·" - 1 I •~•'' •=oo / 4'"2 '~.o$ ;::r:,:;:. '""~~ - - - - ...... - .,., -, '"·"' i :: '·"•rn~ " ' ' ' \ PARCEL MAP 14- 02 PINR ~~Dp : ANO / "ARC:c A {;: ;' RHONDA ROAD LS I R17 LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST 25 S00'50'03"W 546 10 "' j /7.Z// ONE- QUARTER OF SECTION 23, PEL S / :r "'.' 2:· , ~·:: <> 200 7-0020788 ~ ·_;o,;~~:;:::::;:::___---,---.,--r~r-----;/--::' ~~ TOWNSHIP 2.3 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST, (soc 50' 03"W 546 16) 7 , z /'Zzz:77-~/"' w 1047.os; - ~o·o3 SHASTA COUNTY, IN THE CITY OF AI'IDE'RSON, SHASTA COUNTY, / 279 52 \___J1Q_5 (Soo-50'03"W1047.00) AREA "A" PER -. ··1 f OUND REBAR -- .... -- 5/8" rJ..)?' __§__QL ...~~ --,.-:,· AREA "A" PER S00'50'03"W 1592.99.' 2007 - 0020788 ;:=!,., CALIFORNIA .;=>t-.:~~.'-,- _1 \-~:\!1., J_....r.:;::-· • ~ ~.. :~-- -oo207B8 (soo·5o'o3"W1593 .t6) 1 LUy-" W/ TAG MK'D RE 2007 __L FOR I / :o . "' ' " :o -"' •'" FOUND T-BAR W1 • " , , BASIS OF BEARING 8700 PER 18 PM I ·oO~FOUND 2" BRASS TAG MK'D RC;014359 ~~R;~;:so \ "-'

N28'06'05"W \ 0.58' / Pill SHAc~;~~~2.~~~'~~g:,~::"~::;,~"~(. - l••~~P<'A-cto•e•P"~""';ooG••ph;c<

6590 lodho!rd Ori~... R..ddi nr.,. CA 9600~

530.~:!1.1792vuk\' w SJO •.Z !1 .8369 f;;x • irofo@>.tlu·n~i,.,....,j,.y..t-um

DATE: APRIL, 2014 SCALE: 1":E100' SHEET 2 OF 2 ATTACHLVIENT 3

_, _ L_ r- <' / ('I -~;;;;;,/_~ / \.·-- :!;!'/ 80 04080 /4/ / ~I!'@ ~~~ ~ -/ / 1 INCH - 80 FEET ./ / ~ ) / /_

I~ I I' I; f _...... ' t. •;,_~t.~111\L\t. I Iy · · ' ,' SITE MAP SCALE: NTS I ' ROAD RIGHT OF WAY CONDEMNATION PER , 2007-0020788 1 CUENT: + JMA IJlNEYARDS COMMERCIAL, LLC _;}(f} co""'"' '" 1409 FALLEN LEAF o, o' " LOT AlTOS, CA 94024 .l\ I ' I OWNER: JMA 'VINEYARDS COMMERCIAL, LLC ~ ·~-, ENGINEER: SHARRAH DUNLAP SAWYER, INC. 6590 LOCKHEED DRIVE

/-t~~~~~il't~&lsNA REDDING, CA 96002 / - / I I SITE DATA / ' . APN: 202-670-0.32, 0.34, 0.3.3, 028 ZONING: C1 r::i'fz. :1<)<" I GENERAL PLAN: COMMERCIAL ~REUNQUISHMENT PARCB. { ---- EXISTING USE: VACANT OF RIGHT Of o'l.""~ 4.41 ~PRES ACCESS PER PROPOSED USE: COMMERCIAL ··"··'\/ 137:: -- 450 SITE AREA: 10.09 AC. ELECTRICITY: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC ' _,.o;«> PARCB. 4 / I WATER: CITY OF ANDERSON / / ~ • // 2.89 ACRES '"'· "" SEWER: CITY OF ANDERSON - ·· i.' ,' ' <.1- ~ I \ J \ ~v./ 10' "OE WATER ·'

\~ ~tifEASEM~NT '/ \ c 1925 \ \ \ 350 AND 1927 .· (f\\~.A.!F': TOWNSHIP 23 NORTH, RANGE 4 WEST, I , ••"'·,,.,, .,,".'"" ./ ._..~,. ) \ ' ' I SHASTA COUNTY, IN THE ClTY OF ANDERSON, SHASTA COUNTY, ~ - . , 7' )"\0.1\ / ~ -- CALIFORNIA ' / .. FOR ' ' JMA VINEYARDS HC? ,:..~:::::::RS:Y.-:~? COMMERaAL, LLC :..?~:.. ::!0~-75:::-::::;.; :::.;·.~:; :;:::ss~::::R

A?~:.. :::ns- :::;·:::-:::s:! BY ) \ ?-­ I SHARRAH DUNLAP SAWYER, INC [J C ovd En$onnn"S • L.. nd ?!,onnin',! • Su:v•·yinp; & M~ppins

--r po~Ar< hol<'<'hm~Pro-s<·M~tion Go~phic• IJ / / l 4nd-c .. • 6?'){) LO<'kh....d Dth,. , R.. dd in;:., CA % 00:!

530.2~1.179:\ Ok'!' • SlO.nl.S369 f~x• info((;.~...:i-~:<~gtr><'<'''"g.... om

SCALE: 1"•80' SHEET 1 OF 1