14Demand and Supply in Factor Markets

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

14Demand and Supply in Factor Markets Chapter DEMAND AND 14 SUPPLY IN FACTOR MARKETS Key Concepts FIGURE 14.1 Equilibrium in a Resource Market Prices and Incomes in Competitive Factor Markets S Factors of production (labor, capital, land,,, and entre- preneurship) are used to produce output. As illustrated in Figure 14.1, demand and supply in factor markets determine the prices for factors. The income earned by PR a factor equals the factor price times the quantity em- ployed. ♦ An increase in the demand for a factor raises the Resource price (dollars per unit) factor’s price and income while a decrease in the demand lowers the price and income. ♦ An increase in the supply of a factor lowers the fac- D tor’s price while a decrease in supply raises the price. QR The effect on the factor’s income depends if the Productive resource (units) demand is elastic or inelastic. ♦ When the firm hires the profit-maximizing number of workers, it produces the profit-maximizing Labor Markets amount of output. And when the firm produces the Firms’ demand for labor is a derived demand, stem- profit-maximizing amount of output, it employs the ming from the demand for the goods and services pro- profit-maximizing number of workers. duced by the factor. The derived demand is driven by A firm’s demand for labor increases when: the firm’s goal of maximizing its profit. ♦ the price of output rises. ♦ Marginal revenue product (MRP) is the change in ♦ the prices of other productive factors rise. total revenue from employing one more unit of la- ♦ technological change increases the marginal product bor. MRP equals the marginal product times the of labor. × marginal revenue, MP MR. As more workers are The market demand curve for labor is the sum of the hired, the MRP diminishes. quantities of labor demanded by all the firms at each A firm hires an additional worker if the wage paid the wage rate. worker is less than the worker’s MRP. To maximize its The market demand for labor is the total demand by all profit, a firm hires the quantity of workers such that the firms. The demand for labor is less elastic in the short wage equals the marginal revenue product. 245 246 CHAPTER 14 run than in the long run. The elasticity of demand for labor depends on the: FIGURE 14.2 ♦ Labor intensity — the greater the proportion of the A Household’s Supply of Labor Curve total cost accounted for by wages, the more elastic is the demand for labor. S ♦ Elasticity of demand for the product — the greater the elasticity of demand for the product, the more elas- tic is the demand for labor. Backward bending ♦ Substitutability of capital for labor — the more easily labor supply capital can be substituted for labor, the more elastic the demand for labor. The supply of labor is determined by decisions made by Wage rate (dollars per hour) households. Households allocate time between labor supply and leisure. ♦ At wage rates above a household’s reservation wage, the household supplies labor. ♦ The substitution effect from a higher wage rate in- Labor (hours per day) creases the quantity of labor supplied. ♦ The income effect from a higher wage rate decreases the quantity of labor supplied and increases the Capital Markets amount of time spent at leisure. Capital markets link the savings decisions of households ♦ An individual household labor supply curve bends and the investment decisions of businesses. The price of backward, as Figure 14.2 shows. The curve bends capital is the interest rate. Over the years, real interest backward when the income effect from a higher rates have fluctuated while the quantity of capital has wage rate outweighs the substitution effect. steadily increased. The market supply of labor curve is the sum of all The demand for capital is determined by firms’ profit- household supply curves and slopes upward over the maximizing choices. They calculate the present value of normal range of wage rates. the future marginal revenue products of capital. Dis- The supply of labor increases when: counting is converting a future amount of money to a ♦ the adult population increases. present value. The present value of a future amount of money is the amount of money that, if invested today, ♦ technological change so that less time needs to be will grow with earned interest to be as large as the fu- spent in the home. ture amount. (Calculating a present value means that ♦ more capital is used in home production. the value of money to be received in the future must be Over the years, both the wage rate and employment decreased (“discounted”) to express it in terms of to- have increased. The demand for labor has increased day’s money.) because of technological change and the accumulation In a formula, the present value of an amount of money of capital. The supply of labor has increased because of to be received one year in the future is: population growth and the use of more technologically Future Amount advanced capital in the home. For most workers, the Present Value = (1+r) demand for labor has increased more than the supply of labor, so the wage rate and quantity of employment The present value of money to be received n years in have both increased. For low-skilled workers, the de- the future is: mand for labor has decreased a bit and so their wage Future Amount Present Value = rates have not risen. (1+r)n In both formulas, r is the interest rate. DEMAND AND SUPPLY IN FACTOR MARKETS 247 The net present value (NPV ) of a piece of capital ♦ The supply of land to an individual perfectly com- equipment is the present value of its marginal revenue petitive firm is perfectly elastic. products minus the cost of the capital. For a nonrenewable natural resource, the stock supply ♦ Firms buy additional capital when its net present of a natural resource is the total amount that exists. The value is positive. stock supply is perfectly inelastic. The known stock sup- ♦ A rise in the interest rate lowers the NPV from ply is the amount currently discovered. The known buying capital and thereby decreases the quantity of stock supply increases with technology and new discov- capital that firms demand. eries of the resource. While both the stock supply and The demand curve for capital shows how the interest the known stock supply affect the resource’s price, the rate and quantity of capital demanded are inversely flow supply has a more immediate impact on the price. related. Factors that changes in the demand for capital ♦ The flow supply is the amount offered during a are: given time period. The flow supply is perfectly elas- ♦ population growth — an increase in the population tic at the price equal to the present value of next pe- increases the demand for capital. riod’s expected price. Because the flow supply is perfectly elastic, the current ♦ technological change — Technological change in- period’s price equals the present value of next period’s creases the demand for some types of capital and de- expected price. creases it for other types. ♦ The supply of capital is determined by households’ If the present value of next year’s expected price saving decisions. The more that is saved, the greater is exceeds this year’s price, it is more profitable to sell the amount of capital. A household’s savings depends the resource next year. on three factors: ♦ If the present value of next year’s expected price is ♦ income — the higher the household’s income, the less than this year’s price, it is more profitable to sell more it saves. the resource this year. Hotelling Principle — the price of a natural resource is ♦ expected future income — the higher the household’s expected to grow at a rate equal to the interest rate. But expected future income, the less it saves today. the actual price might not equal the expected price be- ♦ interest rate — the higher the interest rate, the more cause of unexpected new technology. people save. A supply curve of capital shows a positive relationship between the interest rate and the quantity of capital Income, Economic Rent, and supplied. This supply of capital increases with: Opportunity Cost ♦ increases in income or population. Economic rent is income received by a factor owner ♦ increases in the fraction of the population that is above the amount required to induce the quantity sup- middle-aged. plied of the factor. Income required to induce the The equilibrium interest rate is determined by equality quantity supplied is the factor’s opportunity cost. Fig- between the quantity of capital demanded and ure 14.3 (on the next page) illustrates economic rent supplied. and opportunity cost. ♦ A factor’s total income is the sum of economic rent and opportunity cost. Natural Resource Markets ♦ The more inelastic the supply of a factor, the larger ♦ Renewable natural resources — natural resources the fraction of its income that is economic rent. that can be used repeatedly and not be depleted. It is possible for all factors (for instance, labor, capital ♦ Nonrenewable natural resources — resources that entrepreneurship, as well as land) to earn economic can be used only once and cannot be replaced. rent. The aggregate quantity of land (and other renewable natural resources) is fixed, so its supply is perfectly ine- lastic. Because the aggregate supply of land is perfectly inelastic, the demand for land determines the price. 248 CHAPTER 14 FIGURE 14.3 hire labor up to the point at which the marginal Economic Rent and Opportunity Cost revenue product of labor equals the wage rate.
Recommended publications
  • Market Failures and Misallocation
    Market Failures and Misallocation Ajay Shenoy∗ University of California, Santa Cruz March 16, 2017 First Version: April 28, 2011 Abstract I develop a method to measure and separate the production misalloca- tion caused by failures in factor markets versus financial markets. When I apply the method to rice farming villages in Thailand I find surprisingly lit- tle misallocation. Optimal reallocation would increase output by less than 19 percent. By 2007 most misallocation comes from factor market failures. I derive a decomposition of aggregate growth that accounts for misalloca- tion. Declining misallocation contributes little to growth compared to fac- tor accumulation and rising farm productivity. I use a government credit intervention to test my measures. I confirm that credit causes a statistically significant decrease in financial market misallocation, but has no effect on factor market misallocation. (JEL O47, O16, E13) ∗Postal Address: Rm. E2-455, University of California, M/S Economics Department, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz CA, 95064; Email: [email protected] 2 AJAY SHENOY 1 Introduction The average farm worker in the most advanced countries produces 44 times as much output as one in the least (Gollin, Lagakos, and Waugh, 2014a,b). The sheer size of this gap has led some researchers to propose that an underproduc- tive farm sector may explain late industrialization and economic underdevel- opment (Gollin, Parente, and Rogerson, 2002, 2007). Farming in poor countries may be unproductive for many reasons, but one of the best documented is that markets for inputs, credit, and insurance are dysfunctional. As a result the land, labor, and capital used in production may be misallocated across farmers.
    [Show full text]
  • Factor Markets in Applied Equilibrium Models
    No. 23, February 2012 Lindsay Shutes, Andrea Rothe and Martin Banse Factor Markets in Applied Equilibrium Models The current state and planned extensions towards an improved presentation of factor markets in agriculture ABSTRACT This paper describes how factor markets are presented in applied equilibrium models and how we plan to improve and to extend the presentation of factor markets in two specific models: MAGNET and ESIM. We do not argue that partial equilibrium models should become more ‘general’ in the sense of integrating all factor markets, but that the shift of agricultural income policies to decoupled payments linked to land in the EU necessitates the inclusion of land markets in policy-relevant modelling tools. To this end, this paper outlines options to integrate land markets in partial equilibrium models. A special feature of general equilibrium models is the inclusion of fully integrated factor markets in the system of equations to describe the functionality of a single country or a group of countries. Thus, this paper focuses on the implementation and improved representation of agricultural factor markets (land, labour and capital) in computable general equilibrium (CGE) models. This paper outlines the presentation of factor markets with an overview of currently applied CGE models and describes selected options to improve and extend the current factor market modelling in the MAGNET model, which also uses the results and empirical findings of our partners in this FP project. FACTOR MARKETS Working Papers present work being conducted within the FACTOR MARKETS research project, which analyses and compares the functioning of factor markets for agriculture in the member states, candidate countries and the EU as a whole, with a view to stimulating reactions from other experts in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • A Test of the Economic Base Hypothesis in the Small Forest Communities of Southeast Alaska
    United States Department of Agriculture A Test of the Economic Base Forest Service Hypothesis in the Small Forest Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Communities of Southeast Alaska Report PNW-GTR-592 Guy C. Robertson December 2003 Author Guy C. Robertson was a forest economist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331. Robertson is now a policy analyst, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Policy Analysis, 201 14th Street SW, Washington, DC 20024. Abstract Robertson, Guy C. 2003. A test of the economic base hypothesis in the small forest communities of southeast Alaska. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-592. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 101 p. Recent harvest declines in the Western United States have focused attention on the question of economic impacts at the community level. The impact of changing timber-related economic activity in a given community on other local activity and the general economic health of the community at large has been a persistent and often contentious issue in debates surrounding forest policy decisions. The eco- nomic base hypothesis, in which changes in local export-related economic activ- ity are assumed to cause changes in economic activity serving local demand, is a common framework for understanding impacts of forest policy decisions and forms the basis of models commonly used to provide estimates of expected local impacts under different policy options. This study uses community-specific, time-series employment data to test the economic base hypothesis in the small, semi-isolated communities of southeast Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • Macroeconomics Theory and Policy | 3Rd Edition by B
    MACROeconomics Theory and Policy | 3rd Edition by B. Modjtahedi Included in this preview: • Copyright Page • Table of Contents • Excerpt of Chapter 1 For additional information on adopting this book for your class, please contact us at 800.200.3908 x501 or via e-mail at [email protected] MACROECONOMICS Theory and Policy, 3rd Edition by B. Modjtahedi University of California, Davis Copyright © 2011 by University Readers, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information retrieval system without the written permission of University Readers, Inc. First published in the United States of America in 2011 by Cognella, a division of University Readers, Inc. Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. 15 14 13 12 11 1 2 3 4 5 Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-60927-010-0 CONTENTS PREFACE VII CHAPTER 7 143 The Goods and Services Market CHAPTER 1 1 CHAPTER 8 163 What Do Economists Do? We Model For Food The Money Market: Supply of Money CHAPTER 2 23 CHAPTER 9 185 Private Costs and benefi ts: Rational Economic Behavior The Money Market: Demand for Money CHAPTER 3 49 CHAPTER 10 205 Social Costs and benefi ts: Economic Effi ciency The Loanable Funds Market CHAPTER 4 67 CHAPTER 11 229
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Microeconomics E201
    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ INTRODUCTION TO MICROECONOMICS E201 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Dr. David A. Dilts Department of Economics, School of Business and Management Sciences Indiana - Purdue University - Fort Wayne $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ May 10, 1995 First Revision July 14, 1995 Second Revision May 5, 1996 Third Revision August 16, 1996 Fourth Revision May 15, 2003 Fifth Revision March 31, 2004 Sixth Revision July 7, 2004 $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Introduction to Microeconomics, E201 8 Dr. David A. Dilts All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, transmitted, or stored, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of Dr. David A. Dilts 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995 ,1996, 2003 and 2004 Published by Indiana - Purdue University - Fort Wayne for use in classes offered by the Department
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 13 Factor Market and Pricing Decisions
    UNIT 13 FACTOR MARKET AND PRICING DECISIONS Structure 13.0 Objectives 13.1 Introduction 13.2 Meaning of Factor Markets 13.3 Concepts of Demand and Supply of a Factor 13.3.1 Demand for Factor 13.3.2 Supply of Factor 13.4 Factor Pricing by Marginal Productivity Theory 13.5 Determination of Returns to a Factor 13.5.1 Rent 13.5.2 Wages 13.5.3 Interest 13.5.4 Profits 13.6 Role of Factor Prices in Pricing Decision of the Firm 13.7 Let Us Sum Up 13.8 References 13.9 Answers or Hints to Check Your Progress Exercises 13.0 OBJECTIVES After learning about the different market structures viz. Perfect Competition Monopoly, monopolistic competition and oligopoly in Unit 9 to 12 which explain the different equilibrium conditions of price and output in the product market, this unit introduces the concept of factor market i.e. the market for factors of production in an economy. This unit will develop your understanding about how factor markets operate distinctly from product markets, how pricing decisions take place in factor markets and how returns to factors of production are determined. After going through this unit, you will be able to: • state the concept of a factor market; • explain the demand and supply mechanisms in factor markets; • discuss marginal productivity theory of factor pricing; • articulate pricing decisions for a factor and; and • determine returns to factors of production viz. Wages, interest, rent and profit. Dr. Nausheen Nizami, Assistant Professor of Economics, Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyay 279 Petrolium University, Ahmedabad.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Communes and Factor Market Imperfections: Micro-Evidence from Late 19Th-Century Russia
    Land Communes and Factor Market Imperfections: Micro-Evidence from Late 19th-Century Russia Steven Nafziger∗ October, 2005 Abstract Why was the Russian economy relatively backward before the Revolution? Alexander Gerschenkron and others have argued that the peasant land commune’s system of collective property rights and control over household resource decisions introduced frictions into factor markets. These features of the commune reduced the ability of households to exit agriculture, thus lowering the supply of labor to industry and economic growth. I employ newly collected archival data from a survey of rural households in 1899 to evaluate this argument. I show that households used a variety of factor adjustment mechanisms. These included the hiring of labor and the allocation of household labor to off-farm work. Households actively participated in land rental markets and were able to shift land between generations and within the community through the commune’s land allocation system. By looking at household mortality shocks, I measure the extent of factor adjustments and the degree to which households were able to respond through the various land and labor mechanisms. I show that household adjustments to mortality shocks came primarily through the labor market. I also find that the communal land allocation system was relatively efficient for adjusting land holdings. Even when it lagged in reallocating shares of the communal land, households could substitute by adjusting through labor and land rental markets. These findings suggest that distortions created by the commune in one market did not prevent households from making needed factor allocations through other means. This implies that communal limitations on labor mobility were less significant than Gerschenkron argued.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Content;Curriculum Guides; *Economic Education; Economic Factors; *Economics; Elementary Secondary Education;
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 113 271 S0 008 676 AUTHOR McCabe, Milo F. TITLE TeaChers Guide to Man a 'nd theEconomic Sotiety: A Sticial Studies Curriculum Supplement.. INS/ITUTION South Dakota Univ., Vermillion. Center for Economic. Education. SPONS AGENC,Y South DakOta'State Div. of- Elementary andSec ondaty-' Education, Pierre. PUB DATE .75 NOTE 85p.; For related documents, see SO 0.08 677,-680. AVAILABLE FROM South Dakota Council on Economic Education, 201.'- Patterson Hall, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069 ($3.50) EBBS PRICE MF-$0.76 HC-$4.43 Plus Postage DESCRIPTORS Banking; Concept Teaching.; Course Content;Curriculum guides; *Economic Education; Economic Factors; *Economics; Elementary Secondary Education; . Productivity; Resource Guides; Socialization; Social Sciences; Social Structure; *-social Studies; *Socioeconomic InfluenceS; *Sociology IDENTIFIERS Senesh (Lawrence); *South Dakota A4STRACT 'Endeavoring to reach a goal of economic literacy, this K-12 economic resource guide provides the teacher witha context, concepts, and content about the economics. of AmeriCanv society and the study of economics in general. Its.purpose is to shorten the amount of work and time that a teacher needs to spenA on reading and locating material. Based, upon Lawrence Senesh's conceptual framework, this resource guide presents eight economic . \* units: Man and His Environmentl'Soialization of Man; Economic Society: A Social Institution; Economic System or Market; Consumption Function and the Product Market; The Production Function and the Factor Market; Modif4cations of,the Market Mechanism; and Measuring and Determining the Performance of the Economic System: Growth and Stability. Each unit includes-a description of the Context, a list of economic concepts related to the topic, and detailed outlines of the content areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation #14: Factor & Labor Markets
    Presentation #14: Factor & Labor Markets In the previous couple of units we’ve been exploring the product market (both perfect competition and various forms of imperfect competition) to understand both the quantity firms produce & the prices they charge to maximize profits. This short unit explores the FACTOR market (also called “resources” or “inputs”). The main goal is understanding how economic factors or production (land, labor, capital and entrepreneurship) are used by firms to maximize profits. The factor that will be explored as an example in this unit will be LABOR. The goal is to better understand how firms in competitive markets decide how many workers to hire and what wages workers receive. SEE END OF THIS SLIDESHOW FOR INSTRUCTIONS ON ASSIGNMENT #8 (DUE FRIDAY 4/17 at 3:00) Video #1: Crash Course Introduces Labor Markets in 10 Minutes Review: What are the Four FACTORS of Production? Land: All natural resources that are used to produce goods and services. Labor: Any effort people devote to a task for which that person is paid. Capital: Physical Capital- Any human made resource that is used to create other goods and services. (Ex: machine) Human Capital- Any skills or knowledge gained by a worker through education and experience. (Ex: Education) Entrepreneurship: Ambitious & creative leaders who combine the other factors of production to create goods and services. Review: What are the payments made for the use of the factors of production called? Land is paid Rent Labor is paid Wage Capital is paid Interest Entrepreneurs are paid Profit In the product market (last unit), individuals pay businesses for goods and services (ex: buying products) In the FACTOR market (this unit), businesses pay individuals for the use of resources (ex: wages) The FACTOR we will examine in this unit as an example is LABOR REVIEW: Graphs for the Demand & Supply of LABOR Labor Market Equilibrium = Where Supply & Demand meet Video #2: Wages (the price of labor) is set by the Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Labor Market Distortions, Rural-Urban Inequality, and the Opening of People’S Republic of China’S Economy
    ERD Working Paper No. 59 Labor Market Distortions, Rural-Urban Inequality, and the Opening of People’s Republic of China’s Economy THOMAS HERTEL AND FAN ZHAI November 2004 Thomas Hertel is Founding Director of the Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University, and Fan Zhai is an Economist in the Macroeconomics and Finance Research Division, Economics and Research Department, Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in the paper are those of the authors and should not be attributed to their affiliated institution. This work was undertaken with partial support from the join Development Research Council/World Bank project on “China’s WTO Accession and Poverty.” ERD WORKING PAPER SERIES NO. 59 25 Asian Development Bank P.O. Box 789 0980 Manila Philippines ©2004 by Asian Development Bank November 2004 ISSN 1655-5252 The views expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank. FOREWORD The ERD Working Paper Series is a forum for ongoing and recently completed research and policy studies undertaken in the Asian Development Bank or on its behalf. The Series is a quick-disseminating, informal publication meant to stimulate discussion and elicit feedback. Papers published under this Series could subsequently be revised for publication as articles in professional journals or chapters in books. CONTENTS Abstract vii I. Introduction 1 II. Modeling the Labor Market Distortions in the PRC 2 A. Empirical Evidence on Rural-Urban Wage Differences 2 B. Modeling Transaction Costs 4 C. Off-farm Labor Mobility 5 III. CGE Model 6 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Demand, Supply, and Market Equilibrium
    Chapter 3 Demand, Supply, and Market Equilibrium Prepared by: Fernando & Yvonn Quijano © 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair Demand, Supply, and Market Equilibrium 3 Chapter Outline Firms and Households: The Basic Decision-Making Units Input Markets and Output Markets: Equilibrium The Circular Flow Demand in Product/Output Markets Changes in Quantity Demanded versus Changes in Demand Price and Quantity Demanded: The Law of Demand Other Determinants of Household Demand Market Shift of Demand versus Movement along a Demand Curve From Household Demand to Market Demand Supply in Product/Output Markets Price and Quantity Supplied: The Law of Supply Other Determinants of Supply Shift of Supply versus Movement along a Supply Curve From Individual Supply to Market Supply Market Equilibrium Excess Demand Excess Supply CHAPTER 3: Demand, Supply, and Supply, Demand,3: CHAPTER Changes in Equilibrium Demand and Supply in Product Markets: A Review Looking Ahead: Markets and the Allocation of Resources © 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 2 of 46 FIRMS AND HOUSEHOLDS: THE BASIC DECISION-MAKING UNITS firm An organization that transforms resources (inputs) into products (outputs). Firms are the primary producing units in a market economy. Equilibrium entrepreneur A person who organizes, Market manages, and assumes the risks of a firm, taking a new idea or a new product and turning it into a successful business. households The consuming units in an economy. CHAPTER 3: Demand, Supply, and Supply, Demand,3: CHAPTER © 2007 Prentice Hall Business Publishing Principles of Economics 8e by Case and Fair 3 of 46 INPUT MARKETS AND OUTPUT MARKETS: THE CIRCULAR FLOW product or output markets The markets in which goods and services are exchanged.
    [Show full text]
  • Factor Markets AP Economics | June 19, 2014 | Grant Black
    Factor Markets AP Economics | June 19, 2014 | Grant Black Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Education University of Missouri-St. Louis Introduction • Factors of production and factor markets • Factor income • Derived demand for factors of production • Productivity theory and factor markets – Marginal revenue product – Marginal resource cost – Profit maximization Introduction • Productivity theory and factor markets – Effect of imperfect competition in product markets – Effect of imperfect competition in labor markets – Monopsony • Problems with productivity theory in factor markets • Government intervention in factor markets: minimum wage Factors of Production • Any resource used to produce goods and services – Labor – Land and other natural resources – Capital (physical and human) • Factors of production earn income from the ongoing selling of their services • Factor markets = markets where factors of production are traded – Households are suppliers – Firms are demanders Importance of Factor Markets • Determine prices of resources • Allocate productive resources to producers • Help ensure resources are used efficiently Factor Income • Sale of factors of production usually generates largest share of most people’s incomes • Factor distribution of income = how total income in the economy is divided among labor, land, and capital Factor Distribution of Income, 2014 Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis Derived Demand for Factors of Production • Demand for a factor of production is derived from demand for the good/service produced from
    [Show full text]