Fecal Microbiota Therapy and Its Potential in Medical Practice

Mil. Med. Sci. Lett. (Voj. Zdrav. Listy) 2016, vol. 85(3), p. 111-120 ISSN 0372-7025 DOI: 10.31482/mmsl.2016.020 REVIEW ARTICLE FECAL MICROBIOTA THERAPY AND ITS POTENTIAL IN MEDICAL PRACTICE Haskova Katerina 1,2 , Dyrhonova Marketa 2, Bostikova Vanda 2,3 1 Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Melnik, Melnik, Czech Republic 2 Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic 3 Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic Received 30 th August 2016. Revised 16 th September 2016. Published 27 th September 2016. Summary Fecal microbiota therapy is going through its renaissance period. Even in ancient China, stool and its derivats were used for therapy of various diseases. Now thanks to new molecular methods a new knowledge about the intestinal microbiome and its interference with the human physiology, this method can be used for concrete therapy of disease. Key words: fecal microbiota therapy; Clostridium difficile; infection; immunocompromised patients INTRODUCTION biological methods, but a gateway to deciphering the human microbiome has opened with new molec - The human body is home to trillions of bacteria, ular biological methods such as 16S RNA gene se - which is 10 times more than the number of cells quencing [1, 2]. in the body. Most of the bacteria of our body are lo - calized in the intestine. There are up to 36 thousand With the evolution of these new technologies, bacteria capable of inhibiting the gastrointestinal new projects are organized such as The Human Mi - tract, most of which are yet to be differentiated. Each crobiome Project, which is built by the National In - person has 500 to 1000 species of bacteria in their stitutes of Health to research the links between gastrointestinal tract. The microbiota consisting of bac- human microbiome and disease in humans [2, 4]. teria, eukaryotes, viruses, and archaeon of the gut are in a close symbiosis with the human body and can The main part of development of a human micro - influence the entire organism both directly and indi - biota happens in the first year of a person’s life. rectly [1, 2, 3]. Most types of bacteria that colonize The bacteria produce a number of molecules that our body cannot yet be cultivated by existing micro - closely interact with the human intestine, immune system and other parts of the host organism. University of Defence, Faculty of Military Four main phyla dominate the population Health Sciences, Department of Epidemiol - in the human intestinal microbiome – Bacteroidetes , ogy, Trebesska 1575, 500 01 Hradec Kralove, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria [2, 4]. Czech Republic [email protected] The epithelial cells of the intestine are covered (420) 973 253 205 by a layer of glycocalyx and mucous gel. Its main Haskova et al.: Fecal Microbiota Therapy and it’s Potential in Medical Practice function is to nourish bacteria which are commensal The first modern day application of fecal matter to the human intestine and serve as a barrier to those was in 1958 when Dr. Ben Eisman and his team who that are pathogenic, this has a clear effect on the com- treated patients with fulminant pseudomembranous position of the microbiota. The gel layer is actively colitis with an enema of fecal matter with a positive regulated and differs in thickness and composition effect and full recovery of the severely ill. It is spec- in different part of the intestine and is constantly re- ulated that the pseudomembranous colitis may not newed [5, 6]. Due to the absence of effective and safe have been caused by Clostridium difficile [8]. treatment for certain diseases, interest in microbiome based therapies is at rise. Diseases that are derived Safety from disturbances of the homeostasis of the human microbiome or dysbiosis such as Clostridium difficile There are yet to be case reports on adverse effects infection or idiopathic bowel disease can be poten- which can be traced back directly to fecal microbiota tially treated and even cured by fecal microbiota therapy, there are no cases of acquired infections, even therapy [7, 8]. with immunocompromised patients, even though the donor screening schemes differ from country Fecal microbiota therapy has many synonyms to country. The only potentially harm can be caused such as human probiotic infusion, stool transplant, via endoscopic methods with direct trauma from fecal transplant. This procedure has been a question the endoscopic tools. There are a few speculated of great interest in the recent years mainly due cases of obesity which evolved after fecal microbiota to the increased burden of Clostridium difficile therapy, however a direct cause is still to be proven. infection [9, 10]. Ethical aspects Fecal microbiota therapy has been known to modern medicine since 1958; even so, the precise A few questionnaire based studies were con- mechanism of action of this procedure in restoring ducted to find out the attitude of patients towards gut function is not yet fully understood. It is potential fecal microbiota transplant. The patients speculated that the fecal microbiota transplant for whom fecal microbiota transplant is a potential restores the structure and composition of the colonic therapy are more reserved than the caregivers community and therefore suppresses the growth a of patients for whom fecal microbiota transplant toxin formation of Clostridium difficile and possibly is considered. Test subjects consider fecal microbiota other pathogenic bacteria [4, 11]. transplant as the more “natural” treatment and, therefore, the safer option compared to standard Short history medications. Potential patients consider probiotics to have the same effect as fecal microbiota transplant. The first mention of fecal microbiota therapy dates back to the fourth century ancient China The major ethical aspect is the method of ad- where Ge Hong treated different maladies with fecal ministration of homogenized stool. Routes through matter such as food poisoning and other gas- which this can be done are nasogastric tube, trointestinal disease, but also other symptoms, like colonoscopy and enema. Nasogastric route of admin- fever. Later findings bring us back to China with Li istration was least appealing to patients. Potential Shizhen who gave this therapeutic method a more recipients prefer their relatives to be donors. sophisticated name of “yellow soup” which was also fecal matter dissolved in a liquid and used for Another aspect of concern is whether donors are treating consti-pation, diarrhea and other diseases thoroughly screened for potential transmittable of the gastrointestinal tract not only in humans, but disease and the risk of gaining diseases that are not also in animals [12]. The next big name which had routinely screened for or diseases that are not infec- an impact in fecal microbiota therapy was Christian tious in origin. The initial disgust does not alter Franz Paullini, a German physician who worked patient’s interest in fecal microbiota therapy and in the seventeenth century. He also treated patients would not play and important role if this therapy was with gastrointestinal disturbances, other bodily ma- considered helpful [13]. Neither religious, nor cul- terials such as urine was used in treatment of other tural aspects play a role in making a decision [15, 16]. diseases. He left traceable works on the matters A colorless, odorless pill would be the preferred of his investigation, which have been preserved method of application if possible. The amount of peo- until this day. ple interested in fecal microbiota therapy is the same 112 Haskova et al.: Fecal Microbiota Therapy and it’s Potential in Medical Practice percentage in both sexes. However the reasons why to work in patients with Clostridium difficile people would not consider fecal microbiota therapy infection post colectomy [10, 17–19]. do differ, men are more concerned by the safety aspect of the procedure, whereas women are more Another more modern and esthetic form of fecal discouraged by the possible disgust by the procedure. microbiota therapy is capsules filled with homoge- Neither age, nor level of education had any impact nized fecal bacterial matter, another potential method on the potential decision. People considered the as- of administration. Stool not more than 6 hours after pect of discussing the procedure with the potential defecation is applied into sterile vessels sealed donor as the most unappealing of all the factors. by plastic, after that the top coat is disinfected again. These formed capsules are frozen at -80 °C and kept Procedure of transplantation at -20 °C. Prior to use these capsules are thawed. In some studies centrifuged supernatant of fecal mat- Fecal mirobiota therapy involves collecting stool ter is used, which allows a smaller amount of stool from a healthy donor who has been screened for ending up to 8-12 capsules. The cumulative cure rate transmittable diseases such as HIV, hepatitis A, B and of these patients is comparable with other routes C, syphilis, intestinal infections and other disease. of administration [20, 21]. Certain companies, The potential donor should be of general good health mainly in the USA, offer stool from prescreened with no known chronic diseases including, for exam- donors. This stool can be ordered directly and deliv- ple, atopic disease, obesity, hypertension, and so on. ered to a patient’s home to be administered via enema. The stool is then prepared and administered The screening of one donor with his fecal matter to the patient [12, 14, 15]. being transplanted to a larger number of patients significantly reduces the cost of therapy when a donor Routes of administration doesn’t have to be screened per patient. These donors are paid for their fecal matter [22]. There are three main routes of admission of fecal microbiota therapy - naso-duodenal, transcolono- Clostridium difficile infection scopic or enema based.

Load more