DOCSLIB.ORG

Maps at PAHMA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Maps at PAHMA Reference Number MS # MS Map # General Notes Map name Publisher or Author 2008-MAP-1 ARF MS Numbers ranging from 1-108 can be found through Big Trees Quadrangle USGS 45 out this map and in the margins written in red and green pencil. Numbers 14, 50, and 56 are circled in blue pencil. These numbers do NOT correlate to sites from the site records. “Melones” is written in red pencil and marked on the map. 2008-MAP-10 There are pencil line both solid and dashed drawn Blue Lake USGS throughout this map. Quadrangle Numbers 1-10 are marked on the map in red pencil in two different areas, and 25-35 are marked on the map in red pencil only once. The numbers 5-17 and 46-63 are marked on the map in gray pencil. The letter L-R along with “AA, AC?, AE, AF, AH AG” are marked on the map in pencil. These sites do NOT correspond with Ca-Hum-1-63 in the site records. 2008-MAP-100 “La Porte Rd” is handlabeled on map. Bangor Quadrangle USGS Notes on map: “Eule Ranch ???? sites” “Robinson ???? Rd” “Harry Glawey lives here knows of burrial gd (?)” “x-5 campsite ob??? chips Rt ????” 2008-MAP-1000 Blairsden Quadrangle USGS 2008-MAP-1001 Bucks Lake USGS Quadrangle 2008-MAP-1002 Chester Quadrangle USGS 2008-MAP-1003 Chilcoot Quadrangle USGS 2008-MAP-1004 Chilcoot Quadrangle USGS 2008-MAP-1005 Notes on map: Greenville USGS “Fed. Power Com. Project No. 2125” Quadrangle “Upper Lights Cr. Dam 130’ high” “Moonlight Cr. Dam 190’ high” “Lower Lights Cr. Dam 130’ high” Reference Number MS # MS Map # General Notes Map name Publisher or Author 2008-MAP-1006 Kettle Rock USGS Quadrangle 2008-MAP-1007 Portola Quadrangle USGS 2008-MAP-1008 Quincy Quadrangle USGS 2008-MAP-1009 On the upper left corner, lower mid-right, and upper Sierraville Sheet USGS mid-right margins there is the number “120.39”. Under the number “120.39” on the lower mid-right margin, is written “got 46 May 23”. On the upper right corner, upper mid-left margin, and lower right corner there is the number “5369”. Above the number “5369” on the upper mid-left margin is written “SIERRAVILLE” in capital letters 2008-MAP-101 Notes on map: Bidwell Bar Sheet USGS “Dick Holstein Frank Lisbon }” (Quadrangle) “Company Surveyors Georgia Pacific Inc.” “Mooretown: Feather Falls” “Lumpkin = Camp 1” “Old Finnank Place” 2008-MAP-1010 La Porte Quadrangle USGS 2008-MAP-1011 Quincy Quadrangle USGS 2008-MAP-1012 “Trail” (in red) and “Reported trail” (in green) drawn Agua Dulce War Department on map. Quadrangle Corps of Engineers, U. S. Army 2008-MAP-1013 “Trail (Johnston)” hand marked on map. Banning Quadrangle War Department Corps of Engineers, U. S. Army 2008-MAP-1014 Sites CA-Riv-243 and CA-Riv-245 do not have Banning Quadrangle USGS recorded township and range information; however records support locations on map: sites are across from each other on intersection between Hargrove and Westly Streets in the city of Banning. Reference Number MS # MS Map # General Notes Map name Publisher or Author 2008-MAP-1015 In upper right margin, is note in pencil Big Maria Mtns. War Department corresponding to circled area: “Gravel figs Riv. 12- Quadrangle Corps of Engineers, 14 Rogers SDM-C64 Petios nearby”. U. S. Army “Trail (Johnston)” marked in red pencil in upper right margin, corresponds to green, and then red dotted line labeled “trail” across upper section of map. Green dotted line is labeled “to Bouse”. In right margin, note in pencil corresponding to small circled area, reads “pc on ceil. of shelter”. Second “Trail (Johnston)” marked in red pencil in lower right margin, corresponds to red line labeled “trail”. Note in pencil below second “Trail (Johnston)” in the lower right margin reads “Rogers SDM-C63”. Note in red pen next to label for site CA-Riv-46 in lower right margin reads “Letters refer to Harner’s published pet. report”. Note in blue pencil in lower right corner corresponding to blue dotted circle in lower section of map reads “1,2,3,4= Johnson Photos of Riv-46”. Note in lower right margin in pencil reads “164 many BRMs”. 2008-MAP-1016 “Yuma 32” is marked in red in the center of the Canyon Spring War Department map, but there is no corresponding site record to Quadrangle Corps of Engineers, confirm the validity of this location. U. S. Army 2008-MAP-1017 Sheet 2951 III Chuckwalla Army Map Service AMS Series V795 Mountains Approximation of site 72 marked in green and seems accurate according to site records, but cannot be confirmed with the limited information given by the map 2008-MAP-1018 Some trails and reported trails hand marked on Chuckwalla Army Map Service map. Mountains Sheet 2951 III AMS Series V795 Reference Number MS # MS Map # General Notes Map name Publisher or Author 2008-MAP-1019 “Jeep Trail” and “Indian Trail” hand marked on map. Chuckwalla Spring USGS Quadrangle AMS 2950 I - Series V795 There are records for township and range location of sites CA-Riv-186 and CA-Riv-187, but area is unsurveyed on map. Location is approximate. 2008-MAP-102 Note on map: “Mrs. M.A. Pearce Box 604 Bidwell Bar Sheet USGS Greenville” (Quadrangle) 2008-MAP-1020 “Trail Riv-80T” hand marked on map Chuckwalla Spring USGS Quadrangle Sites CA-Riv-186 and CA-Riv-187 have township and range information recorded, but area on map is unsurveyed. 2008-MAP-1021 AMS 2750 - IV - Series V795 Clark Lake USGS Quadrangle 2008-MAP-1022 There is a minor discrepancy between the recorded Coachella USGS location of site CA-Riv-258 and its location on the Quadrangle map. 2008-MAP-1023 “Trail (Johnston)” and reported trails hand marked Coachella Qudrangle War Department on map. Corps of Engineers, U. S. Army 2008-MAP-1024 There is a question mark next to the label for site Coachella USGS CA-Riv-4, and then the numbers “5”, “6”; these Quadrangle possibly refer to CA-Riv-5 and CA-Riv-6, though these sites are not labeled on the map. 2008-MAP-1025 Site CA-Riv-46, though labeled, does not seem to Corona Quadrangle War Department match site records Corps of Engineers, U. S. Army 2008-MAP-1026 Cottonwood Spring USGS Quadrangle 2008-MAP-1027 Trails hand marked on map. Cottonwood Spring War Department Quadrangle Corps of Engineers, U. S. Army Reference Number MS # MS Map # General Notes Map name Publisher or Author 2008-MAP-1028 There is a discrepancy between the recorded Cottonwood Spring USGS location of site CA-Riv-257 and its marked location Quadrangle on map. 2008-MAP-1029 Coxcomb Mountains USGS Quadrangle 2008-MAP-103 “Feather Riv” handwritten on back. Bidwell Bar USGS (Quadrangle) No numbered sites on map. Several locations/place names are circled in red: Big Bar, Big Bend, Big Bend Mt., Pearvine, Berry (Creek), Bald Rock. 2008-MAP-1030 Trails and reported trails hand marked on map. Edom Quadrangle War Department Corps of Engineers, Note on map: “53 = blue trail, see Johnston Photos U. S. Army of ‘4-corners’ area” 2008-MAP-1031 Reported trail and Riv 53T Trail marked on map. Ehrenberg War Department CA-Riv-38 and CA-Riv-39 do not have recorded Quadrangle Corps of Engineers, township or range information; however records U. S. Army describe the site being intersected by a highway (95); this is supported by the information on the map, and makes it likely that the sites are in the correct location. Site CA-Riv-47 is labeled on the map, but records do not provide township or range information. 2008-MAP-1032 Note in pencil next to label for site CA-Riv-202 in Hemet Qudrangle War Department top left margin reads, “pespits”, and “2 caves in this Corps of Engineers, area see Calif. Caves for June, July 1950”. U. S. Army 2008-MAP-1033 There is a discrepancy between the recorded Hemet Quadrangle USGS location of site CA-Riv-302 and on map. There is a discrepancy between the recorded location of site CA-Riv-323 and on map. The records for site CA-Riv-300 do not record a location for the site, but the site is labeled on map. Reference Number MS # MS Map # General Notes Map name Publisher or Author 2008-MAP-1034 There is a discrepancy between the recorded Idyllwild Quadrangle USGS location of site CA-Riv-207 and its location on 2008-MAP-1034. There is a discrepancy between the recorded location of site CA-Riv-212 and its location on 2008-MAP-1034. In pencil above the label for site CA-Riv-18 is a word that looks like “Idylliodd”. 2008-MAP-1035 There is a discrepancy between the recorded Mc Coy Spring USGS location of site CA-Riv-183 and its location on the Quadrangle map. 2008-MAP-1036 Trail Riv-71 and reported trails hand marked on Mc Coy Spring USGS map. Quadrangle Site CA-Riv-162 is labeled, and paperwork provides range and township information that would seem to be accurate; though area of map is unsurveyed. 2008-MAP-1037 Morongo Valley USGS Quadrangle 2008-MAP-1038 Murrieta Quadrangle War Department Corps of Engineers, U. S. Army 2008-MAP-1039 Palm Desert USGS Quadrangle 2008-MAP-104 There are two records of “CA-But-33” listed under Bidwell Bar Sheet USGS the “Site (if in TMS)” dropdown menu; linked this (Quadrangle) map to the first record. 2008-MAP-1040 Palm Springs USGS Quadrangle 2008-MAP-1041 May be related to 2008-MAP-1042.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions
    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Submersed Aquatic Vegetation Treatment Sites for 2017
    ·|}þ113 80 ¨¦§ 250b ¤£50 ·|}þ160 ·|}þ16 Proposed Submersed Aquatic Vegetation ¨¦§5 250a Treatment Sites for 2017Yolo ·|}þ84 ·|}þ99 248b 234 232 231 233 230 247a 259 225 247b 224 223 246a 226 222 Sacramento 276 269 246b 220 258a 275 221 258b 219 218 ·|}þ113 279 271 268 257a 280 274 257b 255 ·|}þ160 217 270 265 266 ·|}þ104 278 245 277 256b 216 215 273 264 256a 254 283 267 214 284 282 213a 272 263 262 213b 281 ·|}þ220 253a 244 253b 212a Solano 289 212b ·|}þ84 261 252b 243 211a 208 260 252a 211b 207 288 251a ·|}þ12 251b 242 206 240a 287 241 210a 240b 205 210b San Joaquin ¨¦§5 286 204 140 285 203 209a 209b 200 202 201 20 ·|}þ12 18a 18b 139 22 19a 40 176 21a 21b 19b 36 43 37 17a 44 39 138 41 135 106 17b 35 23b 137 104a 104b 105 38 34 136 23a 175 42 129 160 ·|}þ 103a 16 33 31 128 125 24a 174 103b 107 126 24b 111 173 15 30 123 122 69 32 124 119a 101b 114 29 121a 120a 119b 113 110 171 102 101a 14 121b 120b 117 115 118 116 112 108 ·|}þ4 100 68 13 109 28 99a 26 99b 11 67 65 Site ID Site Name Acres 12 10 98b 8 Atherton Cove 22 97 66 60 8 Duraflame 5 98a 10 Buckley Cove 22 96 59 61 14 Headreach Island 65 95 9 18a Korth's Pirates Lair 13 92b 58 62 8 18a Perry's Boat Harbor 9 92a 57 7 18a Willow Berm 22 91a 94 26 Fourteenmile Slough 41 56 63 ·|}þ4 30 Mosher Slough 36 91b 31 Pixley Slough 65 90a 55 54 53 5 32 Disappointment Slough 284 90b 64 34 Bishop Cut 112 93 52 36 White Slough Upland 23 37 White Slough 196 48 49 47 38 Honker Cut 48 89a 50 4 65 Latham Slough 381 79 Rivers End 11 89b 51 46 87b Kings Island 2 87b 86a 85a 87a,b Italian Slough 11 87a
    [Show full text]
  • Public Land Statistics 2003
    Public Land Statistics 2003 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management TABLE OF CONTENTS Table No. WELCOME PART 1 LAND RESOURCES AND INFORMATION 1-1 Acquisition of the Public Domain, 1781-1867 --- Acquisitions (Map) 1-2 Disposition of the Public Domain, 1781-2003 1-3 Mineral and Surface Acres Administered by the BLM --- Public Lands, On-Shore Federal and Indian Minerals in Lands of the U.S. Responsibilities of BLM - Lower 48 States (Map) --- Public Lands, On-Shore Federal and Indian Minerals in Lands of the U.S. Responsibilities of BLM - Alaska (Map) 1-4 Public Lands Under Exclusive Jurisdiction of the BLM 1-5 Area of Oregon and California (O&C) Revested Lands --- Revested Lands (Map) 1-6 Withdrawals, Revocations, Modifications, and Extensions --- Principal Meridians and Base Lines (Map) 1-7 Cadastral Survey Actions Completed --- Cadastral Survey Costs & Benefits to BLM (Bar Graph) --- Cadastral Survey Field Accomplishments: Percentage of Work Performed by Agency (Pie Chart) --- Cadastral Survey Office Accomplishments: Percentage of Work Performed by Agency (Pie Chart) 1-8 Obligations of Appropriations Received PART 2 HEALTHY PRODUCTIVE LANDS 2-1 Percent of Rangeland Acreage by Ecological Status by State 2-2 Condition of Riparian-Wetland Areas 2-3 Resource Conservation and Improvement Accomplishments 2-4 Forest Development Accomplishments in Acres 2-5 Types of Wildlife Habitat on Public Lands 2-6 Estimated Number of Big Game Animals on Public Lands 2-7 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Improvements Completed 2-8 Emergency Fire Stabilization
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of the TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST a Compilation
    HISTORY OF THE TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST A Compilation Posting the Toiyabe National Forest Boundary, 1924 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Chronology ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Bridgeport and Carson Ranger District Centennial .................................................................... 126 Forest Histories ........................................................................................................................... 127 Toiyabe National Reserve: March 1, 1907 to Present ............................................................ 127 Toquima National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ....................................................... 128 Monitor National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ........................................................ 128 Vegas National Forest: December 12, 1907 – July 2, 1908 .................................................... 128 Mount Charleston Forest Reserve: November 5, 1906 – July 2, 1908 ................................... 128 Moapa National Forest: July 2, 1908 – 1915 .......................................................................... 128 Nevada National Forest: February 10, 1909 – August 9, 1957 .............................................. 128 Ruby Mountain Forest Reserve: March 3, 1908 – June 19, 1916 ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Big Sur Capital Preventive Maintenance (CAPM) Project Approximately a 35-Mile Section on State Route 1, from Big Sur to Carmel-By-The-Sea, in the County of Monterey
    Big Sur Capital Preventive Maintenance (CAPM) Project Approximately a 35-mile section on State Route 1, from Big Sur to Carmel-by-the-Sea, in the County of Monterey 05-MON-01-PM 39.8/74.6 Project ID: 05-1400-0046 Project EA: 05-1F680 SCH#: 2018011042 Initial Study with Mitigated Negative Declaration Prepared by the State of California Department of Transportation April 2018 General Information About This Document The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), has prepared this Initial Study with Mitigated Negative Declaration, which examines the potential environmental impacts of the Big Sur CAPM project on approximately a 35-mile section of State Route 1, located in Monterey County California. The Draft Initial Study was circulated for public review and comment from January 26, 2018 to February 26, 2018. A Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration, and Opportunity for Public Hearing was published in the Monterey County Herald on Friday January 26, 2018. The Notice of Intent and Opportunity for Public Hearing was mailed to a list of stakeholders that included both government agencies and private citizen groups who occupy and have interest in the project area. No comments were received during the public circulation period. The project has completed the environmental compliance with circulation of this document. When funding is approved, Caltrans can design and build all or part of the project. Throughout this document, a vertical line in the margin indicates a change that has been made since the draft document
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA FISH and GAME ' CONSERVATION of WILDLIFE THROUGH EDUCATION'
    REPRINT FROM CALIFORNIA FISH and GAME ' CONSERVATION OF WILDLIFE THROUGH EDUCATION' . VOLUME 50 APRIL 1964 NUMBER 2 ANNUAL ABUNDANCE OF YOUNG STRIPED BASS, ROCCUS SAXATILIS, IN THE SACRAMENTO- SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, CALIFORNIA' HAROLD K. CHADWICK Inland Fisheries Branch California Department of Fish and Game INTRODUCTION A reliable index of striped bass spawning success would serve two important management purposes. First, it would enable us to determine if recruitment is directly related to spawning success. If it is, we could predict important changes in the fishery three years in advance. Second, it would give insight into environmental factors responsible for good and poor year-classes. Besides increasing our understanding of the bass population, this knowledge might be used to improve recruit- ment by modifying water development plans in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta under the State Water Resources Development System. Fyke net samples provided the earliest information on young bass distribution (Hatton, 1940). They were not promising for estimating abundance, and subsequent sampling of eggs and larvae with plankton nets also had important limitations (Calhoun and Woodhull, 1948; Cal- houn, Woodhull, and Johnson, 1950). An exploratory survey with tow nets in the early summer of 1947 (Calhoun and Woodhull, 1948) found bass about an inch long dis- tributed throughout the lower Sacramento-San Joaquin River system except in the Sacramento River above Isleton. This suggested the best index of spawning success would be the abundance of bass about an inch long, measured by tow netting. In 1948 and 1949 extensive tow net surveys were made to measure the relative abundance of young bass in the Delta between Rio Vista and Pittsburg (Erkkila et al., 1950).
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) Summits on the Air
    Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) Summits on the Air Canada (Alberta – VE6/VA6) Association Reference Manual (ARM) Document Reference S87.1 Issue number 2.2 Date of issue 1st August 2016 Participation start date 1st October 2012 Authorised Association Manager Walker McBryde VA6MCB Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged Page 1 of 63 Document S87.1 v2.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for Canada (Alberta – VE6) 1 Change Control ............................................................................................................................. 4 2 Association Reference Data ..................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Programme derivation ..................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 General information .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Rights of way and access issues ..................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Maps and navigation .......................................................................................................................... 9 2.5 Safety considerations ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rice Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118
    Colorado River Hydrologic Region California’s Groundwater Rice Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118 Rice Valley Groundwater Basin • Groundwater Basin Number: 7-4 • County: Riverside, San Bernardino • Surface Area: 189,000 acres (295 square miles) Basin Boundaries and Hydrology This groundwater basin underlies Rice Valley in northeast Riverside and southeast San Bernardino Counties. Elevation of the valley floor ranges from about 675 feet above sea level near the center of the valley to about 1,000 feet along the outer margins. The basin is bounded by nonwater- bearing rocks of the Turtle Mountains on the north, the Little Maria and Big Maria Mountains on the south, the Arica Mountains on the west, and by the West Riverside and Riverside Mountains on the east. Low-lying alluvial drainage divides form a portion of the basin boundaries on the northwest and northeast, and the Colorado River bounds a portion of the basin on the east. Maximum elevations of the surrounding mountains range to about 2,000 feet in the Arica Mountains, about 3,000 feet in the Big Maria Mountains, and 5,866 feet at Horn Peak in the Turtle Mountains (Bishop 1963; Jennings 1967; USGS 1971a, 1971b, 1983a, 1983b, 1983c). Annual average precipitation ranges from about 3 to 5 inches. Surface runoff from the mountains drains towards the center of the valley, except in the eastern part of the valley, where Big Wash drains to the Colorado River (USGS 1971a, 1971b, 1983a, 1983b, 1983c). Hydrogeologic Information Water Bearing Formations Alluvium is the water-bearing material that forms the basin and includes unconsolidated Holocene age deposits and underlying unconsolidated to semi-consolidated Pleistocene deposits (DWR 1954, 1963).
    [Show full text]
  • Exchange Agreement for Water in San Luis Reservoir and Millerton Lake Between Reclamation and Westlands Water District to Facili
    Draft FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Exchange Agreement for Water in San Luis Reservoir and Millerton Lake between Reclamation and Westlands Water District to Facilitate Water Supply for the Exchange Contractors and Friant Division Contractors FONSI-15-034 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation June 2015 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and manage the Nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage; provide scientific and other information about those resources; and honor its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION South-Central California Area Office, Fresno, California FONSI-15-034 Exchange Agreement for Water in San Luis Reservoir and Millerton Lake between Reclamation and Westlands Water District to Facilitate Water Supply for the Exchange Contractors and Friant Division Contractors _____________ Prepared by: Rain L. Emerson Date Supervisory Natural Resources Specialist _____________ Concurred by: Shauna McDonald Date Wildlife Biologist _____________ Approved by: Michael Jackson, P.E. Date Area Manager FONSI-15-034 Introduction In accordance with section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, the South-Central California Area Office of the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), has determined that an environmental impact statement is not required for the facilitation of an exchange of 13,195 acre-feet (AF) between Westlands Water District (Westlands) and the San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors (Exchange Contractors).
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of Surface Waters of California
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTI8 SMITH, DIEECTOE WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 296 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS OF CALIFORNIA PART II. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER BASIN PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OP JOHN C. HOYT BY B. D. WOOD In cooperation with the State Water Commission and the Conservation Commission of the State of California WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1912 NOTE. A complete list of the gaging stations maintained in the San Joaquin River basin from 1888 to July 1, 1912, is presented on pages 100-102. 2 GAZETTEER OF SURFACE WATERS IN SAN JOAQUIN RIYER BASIN, CALIFORNIA. By B. D. WOOD. INTRODUCTION. This gazetteer is the second of a series of reports on the* surf ace waters of California prepared by the United States Geological Survey under cooperative agreement with the State of California as repre­ sented by the State Conservation Commission, George C. Pardee, chairman; Francis Cuttle; and J. P. Baumgartner, and by the State Water Commission, Hiram W. Johnson, governor; Charles D. Marx, chairman; S. C. Graham; Harold T. Powers; and W. F. McClure. Louis R. Glavis is secretary of both commissions. The reports are to be published as Water-Supply Papers 295 to 300 and will bear the fol­ lowing titles: 295. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part I, Sacramento River basin. 296. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part II, San Joaquin River basin. 297. Gazetteer of surface waters of California, Part III, Great Basin and Pacific coast streams. 298. Water resources of California, Part I, Stream measurements in the Sacramento River basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Management Accomplishments in the Big Sur Coast Area
    CCC Hearing Item: Th 13.3 February 9, 2012 _______________________________________________________________ California Coastal Commission’s 40th Anniversary Report Coastal Management in Big Sur History and Accomplishments Gorda NORTHERN BIG SUR Gorda NORTHERN BIG SUR CENTRAL BIG SUR Gorda NORTHERN BIG SUR CENTRAL BIG SUR SOUTHERN BIG SUR Gorda “A Highway Runs Through It” Highway One, southbound, north of Soberanes Point. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 “A Highway Runs Through It” Highway One, at Cape San Martin, Big Sur Coast. CCRP#1649 9/2/2002 “A Highway Runs Through It” Heading south on Highway One. “A Highway Runs Through It” Southbound Highway One, near Partington Point. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 “A Highway Runs Through It” Highway One, south of Mill Creek. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 “A Highway Runs Through It” Historic Big Creek Bridge, at entrance to U.C. Big Creek Reserve. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 “A Highway Runs Through It” Highway One, looking south to the coastal terrace at Pacific Valley. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 “A Highway Runs Through It” Highway One, at Monterey County line, looking south into San Luis Obispo County, with Ragged Point and Piedras Blancas in far distance (on the right). ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 NORTHERN BIG SUR “Grand Entrance View” (from the north) of the Big Sur Coast, looking southwards to Soberanes Point, with Point Sur in the distance (on the horizon to the right). ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 Garrapata State Park/Beach, looking north to Soberanes Point. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 Mouth of Garrapata Creek (from Highway One). ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 Sign for Rocky Point Restaurant, with Notley’s Landing and Rocky Creek Bridge in distance.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.8 Water Resources
    4.8 WATER RESOURCES INTRODUCTION This section describes the impacts on County water resources associated with development anticipated to occur under the General Plan. This section focuses on how development at the intensities assumed in the General Plan could affect water supply and water quality. Other water-related issues, such as wastewater, storm drainage, and flooding are discussed in Section 4.5, Wastewater, Storm Drainage, and Flooding. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Water Resources Water resources in Fresno County include a number of rivers and streams, artificial waterways, and groundwater. Detailed information about surface water and groundwater resources is contained in Chapter 5.3, Public Facilities and Services, Storm Drainage and Flood Control, Chapter 5.4, Water Supply and Distribution Facilities, Chapter 5.5, Wastewater Collection, Treatment, and Disposal, Chapter 7.2, Natural Resources, Water Resources, and Chapter 7.3, Water Quality Condition in the General Plan Background Report (Background Report). That information is hereby incorporated by reference and is summarized below. Surface Water Resources The San Joaquin River originates in the Sierra Nevada and flows westerly forming the border between Fresno and Madeira Counties downstream from Mammoth Pool Reservoir. The North and Middle Forks originate in Madeira County near Devils Postpile National Monument. The South Fork begins at Martha Lake in northern Kings Canyon National Park within Fresno County. Average annual precipitation in the upper reaches of the river falls mainly in the form of snow and is as high as 70 inches. By comparison, the arid San Joaquin Valley to the west, average annual rainfall is as low as six inches near Mendota.
    [Show full text]