Tokomaru Fo B Fo B

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tokomaru Fo B Fo B Mangaore Tokomaru Levin Shaon Opiki Ohau Kuku Manakau Foxton Waitarere Beach Foxton Hokio Beach WaikawWaikawa a Beach Beach This page has intentionally been left blank. Horowhenua District Council Annual Plan 2020/2021 2 Contents Introduction Welcome to the Draft Annual Plan 2020/2021 7 What’s coming up in 2020/2021 7 What’s Council’s Financial Strategy? 8 Council Activity Statements 11 Water Supply 13 Wastewater Disposal 21 Stormwater 28 Land Transport 34 Solid Waste 39 Communities Facilities and Services 45 Property 55 Representation and Community Leadership 60 Community Support 66 Regulatory Services 77 Council Financial Statements 89 Indicative Rates on Selected Properties 90 Funding Impact Statement 92 Financial Statements 100 Reserve Funds 106 Benchmarks Disclosure Statement 112 Accounting Policies 114 Significant Forecasting Assumptions 132 Definitions and Interpretations 137 Horowhenua District Council Annual Plan 2020/2021 3 This page has intentionally been left blank. Horowhenua District Council Annual Plan 2020/2021 4 Mangaore Tokomaru Levin Shaon Opiki Ohau Kuku Manakau Foxton Waitarere Beach Foxton Hokio Beach WaikawWaikawa a Beach Beach This page has intentionally been left blank. Horowhenua District Council Annual Plan 2020/2021 6 Welcome to the draft Annual Plan for 2020/2021. It sets out the services and projects that are planned to be delivered for the 2020/2021 financial year and how Council will fund them. For the 2020/2021 financial year, Council is largely planning to do what it said it would be doing in the Long Term Plan 2018-2038. The Annual Plan for 2020/2021 is Year 3 of the Long Term Plan 2018-2038. Our district is growing, and faster than we anticipated in the Long Term Plan 2018-2038. Statistic New Zealand have estimated that in June 2019 the district’s population was 35,000. If that growth continues, more than 50,000 people will call Horowhenua home by 2040. The transformation that is coming will create a whole range of pressures and opportunities that Council is taking a proactive approach to address. We are doing some exciting projects in this coming year; we will touch on some of these in this Introduction Section. The Activity Statements Section outlines Council’s activities and identifies key projects, costs and funding arrangements. Council’s financial statements are provided in the following section, which include the indicative rates tables. There are a number of exciting projects ahead for 2020/2021. As part of the consultation we want to hear your thoughts on establishing a splash pad at Jubilee Park in Levin and your ideas of what should be included in Council’s next long term plan which will be developed later this year. Key projects for the year ahead Council will focus on, alongside business as usual include: Planning new residential areas – the population increase predicted will require about 440 new houses every year. Creating a Destination Management Plan focused on making our district a great place to live, work, play and visit. Planning to improve al fresco dining areas on Oxford Street in Levin. Redeveloping Queen Street to better reflect the historical links between Lake Horowhenua and the Tararua Ranges and improve our environment. Moving the last of our wastewater discharges from disposal to a waterway to land-based disposal. Adopting the Horowhenua Integrated Transport Strategy and getting to work on many projects, including: advocating for more public transport options; a refurbished train station; connecting shared pathways; and, starting the process of working with NZTA as we plan for the Ōtaki to North of Levin expressway to be built. Horowhenua District Council Annual Plan 2020/2021 7 Council’s Financial Strategy is outlined in the Long Term Plan 2018-38. The Financial Strategy focuses on the Long Term Plan’s wider goal of managing growth while living within its means. A higher than inflation rate increase was identified for the first five years of the Long Term Plan to achieve Council’s financial goals of: Rate funding asset renewals – this means that the renewal of assets is funded through rates collected, rather than by relying on loans. Find alternative sources of income to fund growth projects – this means sources of income that is not rates (e.g. development contributions could be an option). Maintaining a balanced operating budget – this means Council’s revenue is equal to or exceeds operating expenditures so there is no budget deficit. By 30 June 2021 Council expects to have ‘net debt’ of $115m, compared to the Long Term Plan 2018-2038 prediction on $105m. Much of the reason Council has debt is to fund capital projects. This is to ensure future generations pay their fair portion of new assets that they will use. Debt is primarily used to fund growth related projects and new assets and to a lesser amount renewing assets where rate funding of these is inadequate to cover these costs in any year. Over the years key Wastewater, Water and Stormwater projects have been funded with debt and in more recent years major community facilities projects such as the development of Te Awahou Nieuwe Stroom and Te Takeretanga o kura hau pō have also been funded with debt. We are proposing a rates income increase of 6.90%. This is how much Council’s income from rates will increase for this financial year. It is not an average rate increase for properties across the district. Property specific rates increases will vary based on factors such as connection to services, differentials and valuations. The proposed rates income increase is 1.36% higher than projected in the Long Term Plan 2018-2038. Two key reasons for the increase include our new and improved recycling service and increased water rate (mainly for Levin). During 2019, properties across the Horowhenua were independently revalued. This will have an impact on the distribution of who rates are collected from, and what individual rates increases are. Each year, the Council’s budget in the Annual Plan sets out the amount of rates needed to keep the Horowhenua running. This total is then split across ratepayers using a combination of factors. Rating valuations are one of these factors used to calculate the amount of rates each property owner pays. A change in capital value or land value does not automatically mean rates Horowhenua District Council Annual Plan 2020/2021 8 will increase or decrease because of that change. It is proportional and depends on whether your property value has increased by more than average in comparison to other properties across the District. If you have an above average rating value increase you will likely receive an increase in your rates. Horowhenua District Council Annual Plan 2020/2021 9 This page has intentionally been left blank. Horowhenua District Council Annual Plan 2020/2021 10 Mangaore Tokomaru Levin Shaon Opiki Ohau Kuku Manakau Foxton Waitarere Beach Foxton Hokio Beach WaikawWaikawa a Beach Beach This page has intentionally been left blank. Horowhenua District Council Annual Plan 2020/2021 12 The Water Supply Activity aims to provide a safe and reliable supply of water to urban (residential, industrial and commercial) and agreed rural properties, which adjoin urban areas. Providing drinking water to defined urban and rural areas for Levin, Foxton Beach, Foxton, Shannon, Mangaore and Tokomaru. Management and maintenance of river intakes, groundwater bores, water treatment plants and storage facilities, pump stations, underground pipe networks and associated infrastructure. Implementing water demand management using tools such as the SCADA system and PRVs (pressure reducing valves). Investigating improvements and extensions to Council’s water supply network. Providing water for firefighting capability in areas where a Council reticulated water supply is provided and ensuring compliance with firefighting requirements in areas not reticulated. Ensuring compliance with relevant legislation: o Meeting resource consent requirements for water takes and assets o Meeting the Drinking Water Standards for New Zealand 2005 Respond to and resolve (if possible) complaints relating to the Water Supply Activity. District-wide improvements – renewals (to replace existing assets) – continuous condition surveys via CCTV and pressure testing analysis, programming replacement in line with road and footpath upgrades, assets that have become impaired and replacement of aged assets in the water network and at the water treatment plants. Water demand management - reducing leaks in the water supply network, including - education, working with the community to identify and reduce leaks, and technical solutions. Levin – growth area (to meet additional demand). Upgrade of existing network in the North East, East and South East of Levin to ensure network has sufficient capacity for anticipated growth in Levin. Ōhau and Waitārere Beach – feasibility study of the future supply of water services. Currently neither Ōhau nor Waitārere Beach have a reticulated water supply. This limits the size of new residential sections as residents are required to provide their own water supply on-site (or a developer provides a reticulated water supply network just for that development). The feasibility studies will be completed during 2019/2020, with the next steps considered by the Water Working Party. Water Working Party – consideration of requirements to ensure the District has a viable and sustainable water supply system to meet current and future needs. Horowhenua District Council Annual Plan 2020/2021
Recommended publications
  • Classifications
    Classifications rt.code.desc Classifications Code Classifications rt.code.base Akitio River Scheme - River Maintenance RC Direct Benefit AREA Akitio River Scheme - Contributor CN Contributor AREA Ashhurst Scheme - Flood Protection AC Flooding Urban CAPITAL Ashhurst Scheme - Flood Protection SUIP AN Annual Charge TARGET Ashhurst Scheme - Lower Stream Maintenance AL Channel Maintenance High AREA Ashhurst Scheme - Upper Stream Maintenance AU Channel Maintenance Low AREA Eastern Manawatu - Lower River Maintenance EL Channell Maintenane High AREA Eastern Manawatu - Upper River Maintenance EU Channell Maintenance low AREA Eastern Manawatu River Scheme - Contributor CN Contributor AREA Eastern Manawatu River Scheme - Indirect IN Indirect Benefit TARGET Forest Road Drainage Scheme A High Benefit AREA Forest Road Drainage Scheme B Medium Benefit AREA Forest Road Drainage Scheme C Moderate Benefit AREA Forest Road Drainage Scheme D Low Benefit AREA Forest Road Drainage Scheme E Minor Benefit AREA Forest Road Drainage Scheme F Indirect Benefit AREA Foxton East Drainage Scheme D1 High Benefit AREA Foxton East Drainage Scheme D2 Medium Benefit AREA Foxton East Drainage Scheme D3 Moderate Benefit AREA Foxton East Drainage Scheme D4 Minor Benefit AREA Foxton East Drainage Scheme D5 Low Benefit AREA Foxton East Drainage Scheme SUIP AC Annual Charge TARGET Foxton East Drainage Scheme Urban U1 Urban CAPITAL Haunui Drainage Scheme A Direct Benefit CAPITAL Himatangi Drainage Scheme A High Benefit AREA Himatangi Drainage Scheme B Medium Benefit AREA Himatangi
    [Show full text]
  • 02 Whole.Pdf (9.122Mb)
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Pennission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the pennission of the Author. PALEOENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF QUATERNARY STRATA IN THE LEVIN AREA A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Quaternary Science at Massey University ALAN HENRY SEWELL 1991 ·-~-. - - ,.-.··,_·.:·.-· Frontispiece: Pencil sketch looking north from the Tararua foothills, south-east of Potts Hill, across the Tokomaru Marine Terrace and Manawatu River flood plain beyond. ABSTRACT Marine transgression during the Last Interglacial resulted in widespread inundation of the southern Manawa tu area. The Otaki Formation constitutes the relatively thick blanket of predominantly marine sand deposited at the height of the transgression and is now exposed in a partially dissected marine terrace abutting the Tararua Range. Sedimentation was controlled by basement block faulting related to a regional strike-slip tectonic regime on the south­ eastern margin of the South Wanganui Basin. Wave-induced longshore currents from the north-west supplied abundant sediment to the coast. North-east of Levin the Kairanga Trough, occupying a north-east-trending structural depression between uplifted basement blocks, formed the centre of an embayment during the transgression. Tide-dominated depositional processes predominated around the margins of the embayment. In the Forest Lakes area, the absence of seaward barriers resulted in an open wave-dominated coastline. Between Ohau and Shannon mixed wave/tide processes predominated. Stabilisation of sea level resulted in shoreline progradation which was especially marked south of Levin where a dune belt formed, mantling the coastal cliff and later migrating inland.
    [Show full text]
  • 3619-Northern Ohariu Fault: Earthquake Hazard Assessment of A
    wp?:4·i .2. 444"'ll,Im6%fi.j - , le..Ibd*di.I 5*fe NORTHERN OHARIU FAULT: 4 /2 ** 4 :ty Earthquake Hazird Assessment of a Newly I . 46. .;1/*if. Discovered Actlve Strike-Slip Fault in Horowhenua 4,2 83 Alan Palmerl & Russ¥an Dissen* 1Soil and Earth Sciences Group, Instii of Natural' 1€sour, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston NorthW a. [email protected] Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences, PO Box 30-368 Lower Hutt, NZ 1&6./AL'Ime [email protected] A#jPlibll+A '\ R Prepared for a EQC Research Foundation Project 97/263 April, 2002 1.0 TECHNICAL ABSTRACT The Ohariu fault, discovered about 100 years ago, extends northeastward from o ffshore o f the Wellington south coast near Tongue Point through Porirua towards Paraparaumu. It has long been thought that the Ohariu fault "dies out" to the north in the Waikanae/Otaki area as a series of splays. However, in 1996 we discovered that the pronounced, 60 km long, NNE- to NE-trending topographic lineation that runs just inland of, and parallel to, the western flank of the northern portion of the Tararua Range between Otaki and Palmerston North is an active, right-lateral strike-slip fault. We name this newly discovered fault the Northern Ohariu fault because it appears to be the northern, along-strike, continuation of the Ohariu fault. Collectively the Ohariu and Northern Ohariu faults define a major active strike-slip fault that has a total length in excess of 130 km. Offset geomorphic features such as alluvial terrace risers and valley margins, and estimated ages based on soil and loess stratigraphy are used to constrain the timing, amount, and rate of movement on the fault.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Public Bus Services in the Horowhenua District?
    Palmerston North Himatangi Did you know Rangiotu Longburn Foxton Beach Horizons Regional Bainesse Tiakiahuna Council provides Foxton Waitarere three public bus Shannon services in the Levin Manakau Horowhenua Otaki District? Waikanae SURVEY INSIDE Have you taken a trip on any of these bus services? Fill out the survey inside Yes and tell us about your experience Fill out the survey inside and tell us what No would make it easier for you to do so Find out more about the Plus services and try them out For more information visit www.horizons.govt.nz or freephone Horizons on 0508 800 800 CURRENT TIMETABLES LEVIN TO WAIKANAE BUS SERVICE* * A minor timetable change has taken place as of 15 July 2018 Greater Wellington has made a slight adjustment to their train timetable and as result we have adjusted the bus departure times. (i.e Depart Levin changed from 9.30am to 9.20am) This operational change ensures passengers still have the opportunity to connect to the train travelling south. DEPARTS LEVIN Tuesday/Thursday Morning Time as of 15 July 2018 Location Depart Levin 9.20 am Te Takeretanga o Kura-hau-pō, Bath Street, Levin Depart Manakau 9.38 am Honi Taipua Street (opposite Manakau Bowling & Sports Club) Depart Otaki 9.51am Intercity Bus Shelter, Main Highway Otaki Arrive Waikanae 10.05am Train Station, Waikanae DEPARTS WAIKANAE Depart Waikanae 2.45 pm Train Station, Waikanae Depart Otaki 3.11 pm Intercity Bus Shelter, Main Highway Otaki Depart Manakau 3.24 pm Honi Taipua Street (opposite Manakau Bowling & Sports Club) Arrive Levin 3.38 pm
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Foredune Vegetation in Wellington Conservancy
    Coastal foredune vegetation in Wellington Conservancy Current status and future management Coastal foredune vegetation in Wellington Conservancy Current status and future management by Randall Milne and John Sawyer Published by: Department of Conservation P. O. Box 5086 Wellington NEW ZEALAND Prepared by: Randall Milne & John Sawyer Department of Conservation Wellington Conservancy P. O. Box 5086 Wellington Tel: 04 472 5821 ISBN: 0-478-22337-4 © 2002 Department of Conservation Cover photo: Austrofestuca littoralis near the Pencarrow lakes, Wellington. Photo by Mike Orchard. CONTENTS Executive summary 5 1. Introduction 7 1.1 Goal for conservation of coastal foredunes 7 1.2 Objectives of this investigation 7 1.3 Classification of dune vegetation communities 8 1.4 Coastal dunes 9 1.5 Description of the five species 11 1.6 Conservation status of coastal foredune vegetation 14 2. M ethods and results 19 3. Discussion 25 4. Protection and restoration of coastal foredune vegetation 27 4.1 Protection of coastal foredune vegetation 27 4.2 Ecological restoration of coastal dune vegetation 28 5. Key sites for management of coastal foredune vegetation 32 Foxton Ecological District 33 Cook Strait Ecological District 34 Aorangi Ecological District 34 Wairarapa Plains Ecological District 34 Eastern Wairarapa Ecological District 35 Tararua Ecological District 36 6. Recommendations for protection and recovery of coastal foredune vegetation 37 7. Acknowledgements 38 8. References 39 Appendix 1 Preliminary list of indigenous plant species associated with coastal dune vegetation in Wellington Conservancy 45 Appendix 2 Native and exotic bird species associated with coastal dune systems 47 Appendix 3 Preliminary list of adventive plant species associated with coastal dune systems that have the potential to become pests in Wellington Conservancy.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Spread of Tuberculosis in the Kapiti and Horowhenua Districts
    Recent spread of tuberculosis in the Kapiti and Horowhenua districts The Kapiti, Horowhenua and Manawatu dis- proximity to Wellington, there are many Tuberculosis breakdowns tricts have traditionally been free of bovine subdivisions of small farming or lifestyle tuberculosis. lnvestigations of tuberculosis blocks whose owners commute to the The breakdowns that occurred are breakdowns before 1990 showed that the in- capital. Horticultural blocks, with accom- shown in Table I. fection couldgenerally be traced to cattle that panying shelter belts, are scattered be- Otaki Beach: In early 1992, a large had movedfrom tuberculosis endemic areas. tween the livestock farms as the climate town-supply dairy herd just north of the Most breakdowns in cattle herds involved is suitable for many enterprises such as Otaki River (Property A, see Table I) was only a single infected animal. Since 1990, pip and stone fruit. Generally the owners tuberculin tested following the finding outbreaks ofbovine tuberculosis have occurred of smaller 'lifestyle' blocks farm a few of a tuberculous lesion in a bull beef in herds in the Horowhenua and Kapiti Dis- cattle, sheep or horses and the properties animal at slaughter in December 1991. tricts. At the time of these breakdowns there change hands frequently. Thus stock and Investigations revealed no obvious source was no immediate obvious domestic animal human movement is commonplace and of infection. The whole herd test resulted source of infection so a tuberculous wildlife part of the farming culture. in 12 reactors, eight of which had visible source was considered. Subsequent surveys Before 1992, the endemic area to the lesions at slaughter.
    [Show full text]
  • Porirua Ki Manawatu Inquiry Inland Waterways Cultural Perspectives
    Wai 2200, #A198 Porirua ki Manawatū Inquiry Inland Waterways Cultural Perspectives Technical Report Te Rangitāwhia Whakatupu Mātauranga Ltd By Associate Professor Huhana Smith 2017 A report commissioned by the Crown Forestry Rental Trust 1 Contents CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 9 1.1 Report writer ...................................................................................................................... 9 1.2 The team .......................................................................................................................... 10 1.3 The purpose ..................................................................................................................... 11 1.4 Geographic Scope and Limitations .................................................................................. 12 1.4.1 Themes, topics and maps .................................................................................... 13 1.4.2 Notes on the research themes .............................................................................. 36 1.5 Origins of Project ............................................................................................................. 37 1.5.1 Relationship to other reports and use of additional voices ................................. 37 1.6 Acknowledging active kaitaikitanga within the rohe ...................................................... 39 CHAPTER 2: CONTEXT AND BACKGROUND TO THIS PORIRUA KI MANAWATŪ INLAND
    [Show full text]
  • September, October and November 2013 Consents
    SEPTEMBER, OCTOBER AND NOVEMBER 2013 In the past 3 months the consents team have been processing a number of large applications while it has been business as usual for the smaller scale applications. It has also been a busy time as development of the Nutrient Management consent process continues. CONSENTS Log Jam of large applications The team is juggling three of its largest applications at present. The review of the Palmerston North City Council (PNCC) wastewater discharge consent for Palmerston North has been notified. At the same time the Shannon Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) applications have been made which have also been notified, and which will likely be referred directly to the Environment Court, and the Feilding WWTP applications are almost complete and will be lodged before Christmas. We are very pleased that these three important projects are progressing. However it does create a logistical challenge to hear them all in a reasonable time period. At this stage there is a real chance that hearings could be required at about the same time which makes finding commissioners, evidence exchanges and internal staffing challenging Furthermore, these projects involve many of the same expert witness and processing these at the same time will no doubt be a burden on these people. The Shannon proposal will be progressed within statutory timeframes. The court has been critical of the protracted history of these applications and is keen to progress the matter. Ultimately the responsibility of processing the applications will be passed onto the court early next year. The PNCC WWTP review has been notified and a hearing is likely be scheduled in April/May at the earliest.
    [Show full text]
  • Wellington Conservation Management Strategy, Volume 1
    CMS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Wellington 2019, Volume I Cover: McKinnon Hut, 2012. This is a standard six-bunk hut in Ruahine Forest Park. Photographer: Jonathan Astin © Jonathan Astin © January 2019, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISBN Online - 978-1-98-851481-9 ISBN Print - 978-1-98-851482-6 Crown copyright © 2019 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. In essence, you are free to copy, distribute and adapt the work, as long as you attribute the work to the Crown and abide by the other licence terms. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Please note that no departmental or governmental emblem, logo or Coat of Arms may be used in any way which infringes any provision of the Flags, Emblems, and Names Protection Act 1981. Attribution to the Crown should be in written form and not by reproduction of any such emblem, logo or Coat of Arms. Use the wording ‘Department of Conservation’ in your attribution, not the Department of Conservation logo. This publication is printed on paper pulp sourced from sustainably grown and managed forests, using Elemental Chlorine Free (ECF) bleaching and printed with 100 percent vegetable-based inks. This conservation management strategy is made up of three volumes: Volume I, Volume II Appendices and Volume III Maps. All volumes are online at www.doc.govt.nz/wellingtoncms. Contents Long-term vision for the Wellington region 5 3. National and regional objectives, policies and milestones 26 3.1 Natural values 28 Whakataukī 6 3.2 Historic values 34 3.3 Recreation 38 He kupu whakataki 7 3.4 Engagement 44 3.5 Regional milestones 48 Foreword 7 4.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2008-2009 Electra Limited
    ANNUAL REPORT 2008-2009 Electra Limited ELECTRA LIMITED owns and operates the electricity lines and assets in the Kapiti and Horowhenua district Electra Limited Annual Report 2008-09 ELECTRA LIMITED is an electricity line owner and operator in the Kapiti and Horowhenua region on the west coast of the lower North Island, New Zealand. Ownership is vested in the Electra Trust on behalf of 41,761 consumers connected to the electricity network. 2 Electra Limited Annual Report 2008-09 CONTENTS Chair and CEO Report 8 Five Year Performance Highlights - Group 10 Linework and Stones Limited 12 Oxford Finance Corporation Limited 15 DataCol NZ Limited and MultiMedia Communications Limited 16 Financial Statements and Notes 25 Auditors Report 63 Statutory Information 66 Directory 67 All values in this report are in thousands (000’s) of New Zealand dollars (rounded) and are for years ended 31 March unless otherwise stated. ‘This year’ means the year ended 31 March 2009 ‘Last year’ means the year ended 31 March 2008 ‘Next year’ means the year ending 31 March 2010 Electra Limited Annual Report 2008-09 ELECTRA KEY FACTS • 9th biggest lines company in the country in terms of • The Electra Trust holds all shares in Electra on behalf of consumer numbers at 41,761. all those consumers connected to its’ network • Electra’s network extends from Paekakariki in the south • Electra has three subsidiaries to just north of Foxton and Tokomaru, an area • Electra employs 242 staff across the of 1700 square kilometres. network operation and three subsidiaries • Electra is owned by the Electra Trust, which represents all electricity consumers in Kapiti-Horowhenua.
    [Show full text]
  • Horowhenua Growth Strategy 2040 Draft
    Horowhenua Growth Strategy 2040 Draft Horowhenua Growth Strategy 2040 1 Contents Executive Summary 4 1. Introduction 6 1.1 Outcomes Sought 6 1.2 Purpose 6 1.3 Relationship to Other Strategies and Plans 7 2. The Broader Policy Context 8 2.1 National Policy 8 2.2 Regional Influences 8 3. Demographics and Projections 10 3.1 Current Population 10 3.2 Age Distribution 10 3.3 Household Composition 11 3.4 Dwellings 11 3.5 Growth projections 12 3.6 Residential Growth 12 3.7 District Economy 12 3.8 Existing Residential Development Capacity 13 4. Testing the Capacity v Growth Demand 15 4.1 Residential Land Capacity 15 4.2 Commercial and Industrial Land Capacity 15 4.3 Distribution of Housing to Settlements 16 4.4 Scenarios for Growth Demand 16 5. Urban Form and the Future 18 5.1 Footprint and Density 18 5.2 Infrastructure 19 5.3 Hazards and Other Values 21 2 Horowhenua District Council 6. Community Engagement 22 7. District Growth Objectives 24 7.1 Growth Management Principles 24 8. Spatial Strategy for Growth 26 8.1 Spatial Strategy 26 8.2 Density 27 9. Future Development 30 9.1 Development Area and Assessment Criteria 30 10. Identification of Options for Each Settlement 32 10.1 Levin/Taitoko 32 10.2 Foxton Beach 35 10.3 Foxton/Te Awahou 36 10.4 Waitārere Beach 37 10.5 Ōhau 38 10.6 Waikawa Beach 39 10.7 Manakau 40 10.8 Tokomaru 41 10.9 Shannon 42 10.10 Hōkio Beach 42 11.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NEWZEALAN'e) Gaziette
    THE NEWZEALAN'E) GAZiETTE Classification oj Road" ,:n H orowhenua County Officiating Ministers for 1950.-Notice No. a8 P URSUANT to regulation 3 (5) of the Heavy Motor·vehicle Registrar-Genera!'s Office, . _ Regulations 1950. the Minister of Transport doth hereby Wellington, 20th November, 1950, alter the Horowhenua County Council's proposed classification of the roads described in the Schedule hereto and situated in Horo­ PUESUANT to the provisions of the Marriage Act, JOOS,the whenua County and doth hereby approve sUDh altered classification following names of offioiating ministers within the meaning ()f as described'inthesaid Schedule. the said Act are published for general information :- The Ohureh of the Province of New Zealand, cOTYl/fJJ;on,zy called the SCHEDULE Church of Engkt.nd HOROWHENUA COUNTY The Reverend John Brett Arlidge, B.A. Roads Cla88~fied in Class Two Bapists MAINjIIGHWAYS Pastor Wilbur Thomas Clark. Upper Hutt - Waikanae Main Highway No. 371. Waikanae-Waimea Main Highway No. 372. P. H. WYLDE, Registrar-General. Te Horo - Waihoanga Main Highway No. 373. Levin-Hokio Main Highway No. 374. HeatherIea-Foxton via Koputaroa Main Highway No. 473. Waitarere Beach Main Highway No. 511. Shannon-Mangahao Main Highway No. 552. Eng.neers Registration Board: Examinations, 1950 Foxton-Shannon Main Highwa.y No. 858. COUNTY ROADS HE following are the results of the Board's examinations for T 1950:- Arapaepae, Awahohonu, Boulton, Bruce, Fairfield,Kimberley, McLeavey, Mako Mako, Muhl1noa ]last, Ngatiawa, Queen East, SECTION A Queen' West, Roslyn, Tararna, Te Mamrao, Waikawa Beach, Pass: E.~. Collier, D. P.McLcllan, R. W. Struthem(Auckland); Addington, Albert, Ashlea, Atkins, Buller, Camp bells, .Florida, W.
    [Show full text]