DOCSLIB.ORG

The Southern Baptist Convention Reformation, 1979-1990: a Social Drama

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Southern Baptist Convention Reformation, 1979-1990: a Social Drama Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1993 The outheS rn Baptist Convention Reformation, 1979-1990: A Social Drama. William Stanley Stone Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Stone, William Stanley Jr, "The outheS rn Baptist Convention Reformation, 1979-1990: A Social Drama." (1993). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 5549. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/5549 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographicaily in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 30 0 North Z eeb Road. Ann Arbor. Ml 4 8 1 0 6 -1 3 4 6 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Order Number 9401571 The Southern Baptist Convention reformation, 1979-1990: A social drama Stone, William Stanley, Jr., Ph.D. The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical Col., 1993 Copyright ©1993 by Stone, William Stanley, Jr. All rights reserved. 300 N. Zeeb Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48106 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION REFORMATION, 1979-1990: A SOCIAL DRAMA A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Speech Communication by William S. Stone Jr. B.A., Union University, 1979 M. Div., New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, 1981 May 1993 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express appreciation for the enormous time and effort that Harold Mixon invested. He guided the growth of this study with the commitment befitting a scholar and with the concern of one who shared a common heritage in the Southern Baptist Convention. I would also like to thank Michael Bowman for his encouragement in the initial stage of this project. 1 would also like to thank Andrew King, Owen Peterson, John Baker, and William Cooper who served on the dissertation committee. My greatest appreciation belongs to Glenice Stone. You sacrificed to give me the freedom to pursue this study. Without your hard work and love, none of this would have been possible. ii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ....................................................................................................................ii ABSTRACT..................................................................................................................................................v CHAPTER 1 IN TRO D U C TIO N ......................................................................................................................1 D efinitions..................................................................................................................... 3 Limitations of the S tu d y..............................................................................................10 Significance ................................................................................................................... 12 Methodology................................................................................................................... 14 Victor Turner's Dramaturgical M o d e................................................................. l 18 Breach ...................................................................................... 23 Crisis ............................................................................................................24 R e d r e s s ............................................................................................................25 Reintegration and/or S ch ism ........................................................................26 Other Methodological Considerations.................................................................27 2 UNITY AND PLURALITY IN THE SBC: THE HISTORICAL SETTING . 31 Competing World V ie w s............................................................................................. 32 Competing World Views in SBC H i s t o r y......................................................... 38 Triumphalism and Cultural Homogeneity................................................................ 46 Implications for the SBC Social D r a m a................................................................ 59 3 ACT ONE: B R E A C H ............................................................................................................ 61 Breach Rhetoric from a Social Drama Perspective.................................................. 61 The Setting for the Breach............................................................................................. 64 Symbolic Act: O n e .....................................................................................................66 Symbolic Act: T w o .....................................................................................................67 Symbolic Act: T h re e .....................................................................................................67 Goldzwig's Contribution to the Concept of Breach Rhetoric.... 68 Symbolic Act: F our............................................................................................................ 75 Other Breach A c t s .....................................................................................................78 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 84 4 ACT TWO: CRISIS ............................................................................................................85 Crisis Rhetoric from a Social Drama P erspective..................................................85 Cathcart's Contribution to T u rn e........................................................................ r 87 An Overview of the Crisis R h e to ric........................................................................89 Crisis Rhetoric in the Pastors' Conferences.................................................................99 Crisis Rhetoric in the SBC F orum............................................................................. s 131 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 152 iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 5 ACT THREE: R E D R E S S .....................................................................................................159 Redressive Rhetoric from a Social Drama Perspective..........................................159 An Overview of Redressive R h eto....................................................................... ric 161 Redressive Rhetoric in the Pastors' C o n feren ces.................................................167 Redressive Rhetoric in the SBC F o r u m................................................................ s 177 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 182 6 ACT FOUR: REINTEGRATION AND S C H IS M ......................................................... 186 Reintegrative Rhetoric from a Social Drama P erspective.................................. 186 An Overview
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Baptist Faith and Message 2000 Preamble
    The Baptist Faith & Message 2000 Preamble Report of the Baptist Faith and Message Study Committee to the Southern Baptist Convention Adopted, June 14th, 2000 The 1999 session of the Southern Baptist Convention, meeting in Atlanta, Georgia, adopted the following motion addressed to the President of the Convention: "I move that in your capacity as Southern Baptist Convention chairman, you appoint a blue ribbon committee to review the Baptist Faith and Message statement with the responsibility to report and bring any recommendations to this meeting next June in Orlando." President Paige Patterson appointed the committee as follows: Max Barnett (OK), Steve Gaines (AL), Susie Hawkins (TX), Rudy A. Hernandez (TX), Charles S. Kelley, Jr. (LA), Heather King (IN), Richard D. Land (TN), Fred Luter (LA), R. Albert Mohler, Jr. (KY), T. C. Pinckney (VA), Nelson Price (GA), Adrian Rogers (TN), Roger Spradlin (CA), Simon Tsoi (AZ), Jerry Vines (FL). Adrian Rogers (TN) was appointed chairman. Your committee thus constituted begs leave to present its report as follows: Baptists are a people of deep beliefs and cherished doctrines. Throughout our history we have been a confessional people, adopting statements of faith as a witness to our beliefs and a pledge of our faithfulness to the doctrines revealed in Holy Scripture. Our confessions of faith are rooted in historical precedent, as the church in every age has been called upon to define and defend its beliefs. Each generation of Christians bears the responsibility of guarding the treasury of truth that has been entrusted to us [2 Timothy 1:14]. Facing a new century, Southern Baptists must meet the demands and duties of the present hour.
    [Show full text]
  • A Faithful Soldier Charles Jerry Vines by Nancy Lee Smith
    A Faithful Soldier Charles Jerry Vines by Nancy Lee Smith “A preacher must be both soldier and shepherd. He must nourish, defend, and teach; he must have teeth in his mouth, and be able to bite and fight.” ~Martin Luther In an interview right before his retirement, a news reporter asked Jerry Vines the question, “Let‟s just say that you could gather every single person on the First Coast to listen to your last sermon here, what would be your message?” Vines answered saying he would speak on a familiar passage from the third chapter of the book of John. “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life.” He then added, “That‟s the whole thing in a nutshell.” Proclaiming the message of God‟s love from John 3:16 has been the nutshell of Jerry Vines‟ ministry for over 50 years. From small country churches in the red hills of Georgia to meetings with United States Presidents, Jerry Vines‟ ministry has flourished. His retirement from the pastorate and his new focus on preachers marks the end of one chapter and the beginning of a new one. Hearing a message of love from Jerry Vines may not be what some people expect from the nationally known preacher. Indeed, his sermons, his opinions, and his writings cause some to label him controversial, even contentious. “Any time a man preaches the truth of Scripture, that in and of itself becomes controversial in our culture, especially,” Vines says.
    [Show full text]
  • How Orthodox and Non-Orthodox Christians
    HOW ORTHODOX AND NON-ORTHODOX CHRISTIANS DIFFER Two Separate Models of Spirituality and Salvation By The Most Reverend Chrysostomos Former Archbishop and Metropolitan Emeritus of Etna I. Orthodoxy, Non-Traditionalist Orthodoxy, and Non-Orthodox Christianity It is difficult, in trying to explain to non-Orthodox (heterodox) Western Christians how Or - thodoxy and Western Christianity differ, without first explaining why, in the Orthodox world, there is an internal division between so-called traditionalist and non-traditionalist Orthodox (or ecu - menists and anti-ecumenists, a distinction that I will address subsequently). I shall, therefore, try to address that very complex issue, before presenting a model for understanding the things that separate Orthodox and non-Orthodox Christians. Traditionalists often, though not exclusively, operate under the banner of the Old Calendar (more precisely, the Church or Festal Calendar) and resistance to the adoption of the Papal or so- called “Revised Julian Calendar” by some Orthodox, and almost all Orthodox in America, in the twentieth century. Non-traditionalists have abandoned many of the traditions of Orthodoxy, some - times the Church Calendar—for which reason they are, in that instance, called “New Calen - darists”—and sometimes, though holding to the Church Calendar, other traditions, such as traditional forms of clerical dress, fasting, and worship, emphasis on monasticism, and so on. Be - tween the traditionalists and non-traditionalists there are varying degrees of interaction, variously marked by brotherly toleration of differences in practice and belief and, unfortunately, shockingly opprobrious hostility and enmity. This division in Orthodoxy not only makes it difficult to explain how Orthodox and non- Orthodox Christianity differ, but occasions immense confusion, since the non-traditionalist Ortho - dox, and especially in America, have adopted many of the traditions, much of the language, and a great deal of the ethos of Western Christianity, creating a sort of ethnically-centered but hybrid Or - thodoxy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin, Theology, Transmission, and Recurrent Impact of Landmarkism in the Southern Baptist Convention (1850-2012)
    THE ORIGIN, THEOLOGY, TRANSMISSION, AND RECURRENT IMPACT OF LANDMARKISM IN THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION (1850-2012) by JAMES HOYLE MAPLES submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF THEOLOGY in the subject CHURCH HISTORY at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA Supervisor: PROF M. H. MOGASHOA March 2014 © University of South Africa ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH DOCTORAL PROJECT UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA Title: THE ORIGIN, THEOLOGY, TRANSMISSION, AND RECURRENT IMPACT OF LANDMARKISM IN THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION (1850-2012) Name of researcher: James Hoyle Maples Promoter: M. H. Mogashoa, Ph.D. Date Completed: March 2014 Landmarkism was a sectarian view of Baptist church history and practice. It arose in the mid-eighteenth century and was a dominant force in the first half-century of the life of the Southern Baptist Convention, America’s largest Protestant denomination. J. R. Graves was its chief architect, promoter, and apologist. He initiated or helped propagate controversies which shaped Southern Baptist life and practice. His influence spread Landmarkism throughout the Southern Baptist Convention through religious periodicals, books, and educational materials. Key Landmark figures in the seminaries and churches also promoted these views. After over fifty years of significant impact the influence of Landmarkism seemed to diminish eventually fading from sight. Many observers of Southern Baptist life relegated it to a movement of historical interest but no current impact. In an effort to examine this assumption, research was conducted which explored certain theological positions of Graves, other Landmarkers, and sects claimed as the true church by the promoters of Baptist church succession.
    [Show full text]
  • The Marks of a True Church Jackson Lawson Bi
    The Nature of the Distinction between the Universal and Local Church in the NT: The Marks of a True Church Jackson Lawson Bi 480 Biblical Studies Seminar April 23, 2019 1 Introduction Although many have used the term “true church,” there has been confusion and disagreement over what is required to have a legitimate NT church. Particularly, there is disagreement over whether discipline as a mark of the church is a mark of a true church or simply a mark of a healthy church (or more biblical church). Rolland McCune states that, “Bible- believing Christians would probably agree on all three” marks that followed the reformation (the third being discipline).1 Albert Mohler Jr., in his journal article titled, “Church Discipline: The Missing Mark,” asserts that, “Evangelicals have long recognized discipline as the ‘third mark’ of the authentic church,” citing the Belgic Confession (1561), that includes discipline as a mark of the true church.2 In the end of his article, Mohler quotes John Leadley Dagg as saying, “It has been remarked, that when discipline leaves a church, Christ goes with it.” Mohler follows this quote by saying, “If so, and I fear it is so, Christ has abandoned many churches who are blissfully unaware of His departure.”3 And yet, as we shall see, John Hammett4 and Mark Dever5 disagree: the mark of discipline is not necessarily required in order for there to be a true church. Does Mohler (as well as McCune) confuse what is required for there to be a true church with what is required for a healthy church? Or are Hammett and Dever wrong? I will establish that they both agree in principle.
    [Show full text]
  • James Madison Pendleton
    SELECTED WRITINGS OF JAMES MADISON PENDLETON VOLUME I Historical and Autobiographical JAMES MADISON PENDLETON (1811-1891) SELECTED WRITINGS OF JAMES MADISON PENDLETON IN THREE VOLUMES k Volume I k Historical and Autobiographical • James Madison Pendleton and His Contribution to Baptist Ecclesiology • Reminiscences of a Long Life • The Funeral of Dr. J. M. Pendleton k COMPILED AND EDITED BY THOMAS WHITE Printed in 2006 by THE BAPTIST STANDARD BEARER, INC. No. 1 Iron Oaks Drive Paris, Arkansas 72855 (479) 963-3831 THE WALDENSIAN EMBLEM lux lucet in tenebris “The Light Shineth in the Darkness” ISBN# 1579780466 SELECTED WRITINGS OF JAMES MADISON PENDLETON IN THREE VOLUMES VOLUME ONE — HISTORICAL AND AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL • James Madison Pendleton and His Contribution to Baptist Ecclesiology by THOMAS WHITE • Reminiscences of a Long Life by JAMES MADISON PENDLETON • Article on the Death of J. M. Pendleton by M. M. RILEY VOLUME TWO — ECCLESIASTICAL • Selected Writings on Various Aspects of the New Testament Church by JAMES MADISON PENDLETON VOLUME THREE — THEOLOGICAL • Selected Writings on Various Topics of Theology by JAMES MADISON PENDLETON v TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME I Historical and Autobiographical k PAGE Acknowledgements . ix Introduction . xi James Madison Pendleton and His Contribution to Baptist Ecclesiology . 1 by Thomas White Reminiscences of a Long Life . 279 by James Madison Pendleton The Funeral of Dr. J. M. Pendleton . 443 by M. M. Riley vii k ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS —————— must extend a thank you to those who made this process I possible. First, I would like to thank Bill Lee and his associates at the Baptist Standard Bearer who agreed to publish this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Distinctive Or Dogmatic
    Southern Baptists, Tongues, and Historical Policy Dr. Emir Caner The Center for Theological Research October 2006 White Paper 12 Published by the Center for Theological Research at www.BaptistTheology.org © 2006 Emir Caner Permissions: The purpose of this material is to serve the churches. Please feel free to distribute as widely as possible. We ask that you maintain the integrity of the document and the author’s wording by not making any alterations. For special requests please contact the editorial board for the White Papers for approval at [email protected]. The Center for Theological Research Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary Fort Worth, Texas Malcolm B. Yarnell, III, Director Southern Baptists, Tongues, and Historical Policy A White Paper from the CTR Southern Baptists, Tongues, and Historical Policy Historical Precedent The situation seems all too familiar now. Trustees of a mission board, empowered to enact policies they believe best represent Southern Baptist doctrine and practice, pass a new policy which stipulates that any missionary candidate who speaks in a private prayer language has disqualified himself from consideration. This stricter set of regulations is first birthed via general guidelines which the trustees believed needed to be codified with stronger language. Subsequently, one trustee speaks out against the new directive questioning the definition of glossolalia (Gr., “speaking in tongues”).1 Moreover, the president of the agency, elected because he was considered a conservative, incredibly speaks out against the new policy, although he subsequently promises to follow its guidelines.2 Finally, accusations are then leveled at some of the trustees, alleging a dispensational view of Scripture is behind these actions.
    [Show full text]
  • Yoked with Jesus KEY PASSAGE: Matthew 11:28-30 | SUPPORTING SCRIPTURES: Mark 10:46 | John 4:5-6; 14:27 | Hebrews 13:5
    SERMON NOTES From In Touch With Dr. Charles Stanley Yoked With Jesus KEY PASSAGE: Matthew 11:28-30 | SUPPORTING SCRIPTURES: Mark 10:46 | John 4:5-6; 14:27 | Hebrews 13:5 SUMMARY alleviate our problems temporarily at best, and may actually add to our load. Jesus wants us to abandon all the We’re all familiar with the junk mail that fills our other yokes we may have tried and come to Him to receive mailboxes yet contains nothing worth reading. His yoke, which is unlike any other. In contrast, every time we open the Bible we receive a Burdens are the daily pressures of life that are weighing message of great value because we’re listening to the voice us down. We’re yoked to them if we wake up with our of God. Unlike junk mail, which isn’t delivered on holidays, burdens, carry them all day long, and take them to bed God’s Word is always available if we’ll pick it up and read with us at night. As a result, we feel weary, discouraged, it. And one of the messages we hear is an invitation to hopeless, and helpless because there seems to be no way come to Jesus, take His yoke, and learn from Him. of escape, and we’re exhausted. SERMON POINTS In Jesus’ day, people were very familiar with a yoke. It was a heavy bar placed over the neck of two animals to enable Every word of Scripture is true, and there is them to pull a wagon or plow.
    [Show full text]
  • Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita June 30, 1983
    Ouachita Baptist University Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita Arkansas Baptist Newsmagazine, 1980-1984 Arkansas Baptist Newsmagazine 6-30-1983 June 30, 1983 Arkansas Baptist State Convention Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/arbn_80-84 Part of the Christian Denominations and Sects Commons, and the Mass Communication Commons On the cover The dangers of civil religion by l arry Braidfoot One of the greatest dangers both to' gov­ political leaders is the mampulation o f reli­ ernment and to au then tic religion is civil gious leaders and programs for political religion. Civil religion is a mixture of reli­ purposes. gion and politics which !erves the interests In the Unitl•d States, rel1gious liberty and of the state In c•vll rel igion. organized reli­ separation of church and state help the gion is used as a means of generating sup­ churches maintain the1r independence. port for political positions. pprova l is While--clear delineation of these principles sought from religious leaders to justify ac­ is difficult. thi independence is necessary tions of the state. The religious insti tutions for freedom of religion to be preserved. assume a role of secondary importance in Efforts frequently are made to get reli· supporting the iniliatives and actions of gious grol1ps to vote in blocks on the basis political leaders. of certain iss ues which are generall y Civil religion is idolo1try which gives chosen fo r their emotional appeal to spe­ higher loy01 lty to some ideo logy or political Cia l iniCrcst groups. Protestants. Catholics. institution than to the l o rd God.
    [Show full text]
  • The Authority of the Word of God in Print and in Person Bruxy Cavey Teaching Pastor, the Meeting House; Author, the End of Religion
    The Authority of the Word of God in Print and in Person Bruxy Cavey Teaching Pastor, The Meeting House; Author, The End of Religion In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being. In Him was life, and the life was the Light of men. The Light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it. And the Word became flesh... ~ John 1:1-5, 14a (NASB) Introduction The Word Made Flesh Whenever we talk about Scripture, we Christ-followers must remind ourselves that ultimately we are not just people of the book, but even more so, we are people of the Person. The book points us to the person of Jesus. The word in print points us to the Word in person. As followers of the Word made flesh, we must resist succumbing to an approach to God’s Word that was as popular in Jesus’ day as it is today. An approach that would unwittingly rewrite the above passage to say, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God... And the Word became print and page and dwelt among us, at least, among those of us who are literate and educated, and it rolled off our printing presses and was memorized and studied and debated and divided over.” We must make no mistake here.
    [Show full text]
  • Baptist Successionism
    The Journal of Baptist Studies 3 (2009): 3-15. THE SUCCESSIONISM VIEW OF BAPTIST HISTORY * James R. Duvall Introduction When Clarence Walker began publishing The Trail of Blood in 1931, neither he nor J. M. Carroll, the author, could have imagined the impact the booklet would have on Baptists in the United States and around the world. The first thousand copies had been sold quickly by another publisher and sales continued steadily from Ashland Avenue Baptist Church in Lexington, KY. Today there have been nearly three million copies sold. The booklet has been enlarged by the present publisher,1 and it has been translated into several other languages: Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Russian and possibly others. It is now on the Internet in at least three languages. The Trail of Blood describes in a brief outline form what successionist historians had written for nearly two centuries. They believed there had been a succession of churches that held the basic doctrines of Baptists, and they were not associated in any way with the Roman Catholic institution. The Trail of Blood does not claim to be a complete history as such, but what might be called a “Baptist Manifesto.” It was written in such a way that pastors and teachers could present a thumbnail sketch of their Baptist ancestors. Carroll's idea was so successful that several authors have used a similar format, 2 while other authors have spent a lot of ink seeking to counter these lessons. 3 W. *Thanks to my son, James Kenneth, for assistance in research and preparation of this essay.
    [Show full text]
  • Contested Ownership and Bible Translation in Southern Africa1
    Whose Bible, mine or yours? Contested ownership and Bible translation in Southern Africa1 Jeremy Punt Department of Old and New Testament University of Stellenbosch Abstract An important but often neglected aspect of the use of the Bible in Africa is its ownership and issues related thereto. Ownership of the Bible obviously concerns its personal possession and all that that entails, but goes beyond the commodification of the Bible in modern consumerist culture to refer, ultimately, to the control of the biblical texts. The limited attention to the ownership of the Bible is mostly restricted to hermeneutics, often identified as a site of struggle in Africa. However, claims to ownership are becoming increasingly visible and up-front in the area of vernacular translations, where such claims and other conditions imposed on Bible translations illustrate the affinity people have with the Book, how their sense of identity and worldviews are moulded by it and how a Bible translation acts as an important player in issues of power at various levels. 1. INTRODUCTION: BIBLE TRANSLATIONS IN AFRICA The Bible has been read in translated format, since its earliest years and even when it was still in fragmented form. For many centuries the translation language of choice would be the Latin of the Vulgate,2 but since the sixteenth century vernacular translations became increasingly common, and on the African continent even more so with the impact of eighteen-century missionary activity. It is often argued that biblical interpretation, in the broad hermeneutical sense of the word, is a site of struggle in Africa, leading to discontent and 1 Paper read at the Bible Translation session of the 2002 SBL Annual Meeting, 23-26 November 2002 in Toronto, Ontario Canada.
    [Show full text]