DOCSLIB.ORG

General Medical Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
General Medical Council GENERAL MEDICAL COUNCIL FITNESS TO PRACTISE PANEL (MISCONDUCT) On: Monday, 11 August 2008 Held at: St James’ Buildings 79 Oxford Street Manchester M1 6FQ Case of: DAVID PATRICK SOUTHALL MB BS 1971 University of London Registration No: 1491739 (Day One) Panel Members: Mr A Reid (Chairman) Ms V Atkinson Dr L Linton Mrs S Breach (Legal Assessor) -------------------------------------- MISS M O’ROURKE, Counsel, instructed by Hempsons, Solicitors, appeared on behalf of the doctor, who was present. MR R TYSON, Counsel, instructed by Field Fisher Waterhouse, appeared on behalf of the General Medical Council. -------------------------------------- Transcript of the shorthand notes of Transcribe UK Verbatim Reporting Services Ltd Tel No: 01889 270708 -------------------------------------- INDEX Page PRELIMINARY MATTERS 1 APPLICATION by MR TYSON re evidence 2 RESPONSE by MISS O’ROURKE 6 SUBMISSIONS by MR TYSON 11 SUBMISSIONS by MISS O’ROURKE 12 LEGAL ASSESSOR’S ADVICE 15 DETERMINATION 17 ------------------- A THE CHAIRMAN: This is a Fitness to Practise Panel operating under the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules 2004 in the case of Dr David Southall. Dr Southall is present and is represented by Miss Mary O’Rourke, Counsel, instructed by Hempsons, Solicitors, and Mr Richard Tyson, Counsel, instructed by Field Fisher Waterhouse, Solicitors, represents the General Medical Council. Mrs Sarah Breach, to my right, is the Legal Assessor. Mr Tyson. B MR TYSON: Sir, before I do my opening I am afraid I am going to have to indicate that there is a legal argument which has to be dealt with first under Rule 22(a). THE LEGAL ASSESSOR: I wonder if I could interject at this point. The issue has been raised with me and it is an important preliminary legal argument. I will of course have to give advice at the end of the two submissions from Counsel, but I had not anticipated this submission and I do need time to consider my advice on what I think is a very important C topic. THE CHAIRMAN: When was the issue first raised? THE LEGAL ASSESSOR: The two Counsel and myself have had a meeting and it was raised in that meeting. The meeting only finished five minutes ago so I have not had any time to reflect. D THE CHAIRMAN: I am very conscious of the fact that this morning was set aside at the request of the parties, I understood so that preliminary matters could be discussed between you. I take it this is something new? MR TYSON: No, the morning was productively dealt with by endless discussions between my learned friend and myself but they did not result in agreement as to the E issues, so my learned friend and I discussed it extensively this morning and then we rehearsed our arguments in front of your Legal Assessor thereafter. Alas agreement did not come as a result of that, so the morning has been extremely productive, we have done all the things we should have done, but the fact remains we have ended up with decisions that the Panel are required to make rather than we have been able to make them amongst ourselves. I think that is a fair reflection. F MISS O'ROURKE: Sir, if I could just add this. I was not conscious that the morning was set aside for that at all. We got a notice of inquiry that told us we were starting at 1.30. It certainly was not our request to start later but it may well be it was a request from the General Medical Council side because of the absence of their Counsel last week on holiday that they wished this morning to look at matters, I do not know. Certainly I was G not conscious. We were here this morning at ten o'clock simply because I had not seen my client for four weeks so I agreed to meet him. This morning Mr Tyson and I had some discussions, they have come to virtually nothing and we have had discussions with your Legal Assessor shortly after she arrived and she has correctly said they finished less than ten minutes ago. Sir, I was told as we came into the room, and that is why I am here with one pad of paper only, that the Legal Assessor was going to ask you for time now rather than before you H heard the submissions so I did not even bring my documents in with me or my papers. I Transcribe UK VRS Ltd 01889 270708 D1/1 A was anticipating we were coming in here literally to say to you, “Sir, can we start at two or 2.15” or whatever it is. If you are going to start now and hear Mr Tyson, me in reply and then give Mrs Breach some time, I am going to need to go and get my papers because I have one pad of paper only. THE CHAIRMAN: As you are no doubt aware, Miss O'Rourke, it is part of the guidance for Chairs that we start on time, even if it is not going to be possible to get beyond a few B opening remarks, merely to ascertain what has gone wrong and why and deal with matters accordingly, but from what I understand this has not been a wasted morning in that work has certainly been done but unfortunately we are not yet at a stage where we can simply proceed. Legal Assessor, you are requesting how much time? C THE LEGAL ASSESSOR: If we could perhaps put the start of the hearing back until two o'clock? THE CHAIRMAN: Very well, two o'clock, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you very much. (The Panel adjourned for a short time) D THE CHAIRMAN: Welcome back everyone. Mr Tyson. MR TYSON: Sir, when I indicated earlier that there was going to be a legal argument in relation to this matter before you heard my opening perhaps I ought to amend it. There is going to be a definite legal argument. Secondly, there is going to be an argument whether to have a legal argument in relation to another matter, if I can put it that way. E Firstly I am going to deal with the definite legal argument; that is - and you have to hear this matter if I may say so wearing your hat as both judge and jury and if necessary what I am going to tell you you are going to have to expunge from your memory depending on your determination in this case but in the course of my opening in this case I seek to adduce evidence that since the last review hearing in July 2007 that Dr Southall has been found guilty of serious professional misconduct by another Panel in December of last F year. As a result of the finding of serious professional misconduct he was erased from the Register and also at that hearing an order of immediate suspension was made. That was subsequently found to have been made on a false basis from misunderstanding the transitional provisions. In April of this year the order for immediate suspension was dismissed by consent by the Administrative Court and hence we are back here, which we G otherwise would not have been. I say the fact of that conviction and the determination given by the Panel in December 2007 are highly relevant to the issues that you have to decide today. I say that for a number of reasons. Firstly, I would ask you to look at Rule 22 of the new rules. I do not know where in your bundles you have the new rules. I cannot take you to the proper tab reference for it. H Transcribe UK VRS Ltd 01889 270708 D1/2 A THE CHAIRMAN: It is behind our tab D, section 22, “Procedure at a review hearing”. MR TYSON: Correct. Rule 22, “Procedure at a review hearing”. You will see the order of proceedings at a review hearing shall be as follows: “The FTP Panel shall hear and consider any preliminary legal arguments” B which is what we are doing that now. Subject to that your role, sir, which you have largely dealt with in your earlier matter we come to (c) whereas I am for the purposes of these rules a presenting officer, not an easy role I find myself in, but I am the presenting officer and I have to do two things under (c). (c)(i), I have to inform the Panel of the background to this case and the sanction previously imposed, but I also have an important secondary role under (ii): C “direct the attention of the FTP Panel to any relevant evidence, including transcripts of previous hearings, and may adduce evidence and call witnesses in relation to the practitioner’s fitness to practise or his failure to comply with any requirement imposed upon him as a condition of the registration.” D The subsequent bit, the “or” bit, I have dealt with and I will deal with it openly now and say there is no evidence that there has been any failure to comply with conditions. I can put that, instead of putting that in a negative I can say is a positive, he has complied with his conditions, there is no issue as to that. There is an issue, I would say, as to his fitness to practise, “fitness to practise” being a global issue of course. I would submit to you that I am entitled - and indeed it defies belief that I cannot I submit, when I am dealing with the practitioner’s fitness to practise - deal with a fitness to practise matter that has E happened since the last hearing in July 2007.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Uses of Maternal Distress in British Society, C.1948-1979
    The Uses of Maternal Distress in British Society, c.1948-1979 Sarah Crook A thesis submitted to Queen Mary University of London, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History School of History 1 ABSTRACT After the Second World War mothering became an object of social, political, medical and psychiatric investigation. These investigations would in turn serve as the bases for new campaigns around the practice, meaning and significance of maternity. This brought attention to mothers’ emotional repertoires, and particularly their experiences of distress. In this thesis I interrogate the use of maternal distress, asking how and why maternal distress was made visible by professions, institutions and social movements in postwar Britain. To address this I investigate how maternal mental health was constituted both as an object of clinical interrogation and used as evidence of the need for reform. Social and medical studies were used to develop and circulate ideas about the causes and prevalence of distress, making possible a new series of interventions: the need for more information about users of the health care service, an enhanced interest in disorders at the milder end of the psychiatric ‘spectrum’, and raised expectations of health. I argue that the approaches of those studying maternal distress were shaped by their particular agendas. General practitioners, psychiatrists, activists in the Women’s Liberation Movement, clinicians interested in child abuse and social scientists, sought to understand and explain mothers’ emotions. These involvements were shaped by the foundation of the National Health Service in 1948 and the crystallization of support for alternative forms of care into self-help groups by 1979.
    [Show full text]
  • 25Th Anniversary Report 2010-2011
    BPSU 25th Anniversary Report 2010-2011 British Paediatric Surveillance Unit Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Supported by the Department of Health Aims of the British Paediatric Surveillance Unit To: • Facilitate research into uncommon childhood infections and disorders for the advancement of knowledge and to effect practical improvement in prevention, treatment and service planning • Allow paediatricians to participate in surveillance of uncommon disorders and to lessen the burden on reporting doctors of such requests arising from numerous different sources • Increase awareness within the medical profession of the less common disorders studied and respond rapidly to public health emergencies. Published September 2011 by the: British Paediatric Surveillance Unit A unit within the Science and Research department of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health 5-11 Theobalds Road London WC1X 8SH Telephone: +44 (0) 207 092 6173/4 Facsmile: +44 (0) 207 092 6194 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.bpsu.inopsu.com Registered Charity in England and Wales: 1057744 Registered Charity in Scotland: Sco 38299 © British Paediatric Surveillance Unit 2011 British Paediatric Surveillance Unit Annual Report 2010/11 Contents Foreword - Conversion Disorder in Childhood 24 By Professor A Emond Chair, BPSU Executive 2 - Glutaric Aciduria 1 26 - Gonorrhoea, Syphilis, Chlamydia and Trichomonas 28 Past Reflections 3 - G u i l l a i n - B a r r é s y n d r o m e a n d Fisher syndrome 30 - HIV/AIDS 33 1. Introduction 6 - Progressive Intellectual and Neurological Deterioration in Childhood 37 2. How the Surveillance System Works 7 - Raised Blood Lead Levels in Children 39 - Selection of studies for inclusion in - Sudden Unexpected Postnatal the scheme 7 Collapse 42 - The reporting system 7 - Funding 8 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Child Health, Health Services and Systems in UK and Other European Countries
    Ingrid Wolfe | Child Health, Health Services and Systems in UK Services and Systems Health and other European countries | | Child Health, Ingrid Wolfe Child Health, Health Services and Systems in UK and other European countries How do European countries compare in child health and child survival? Child Health, How do different child health services, systems, and wider determinants exert long-term influences for good or harm? Health Services and Systems Why do some countries seem to do better than others in securing and promoting in UK and other European countries their children’s and young people’s health and wellbeing? And what can we do to make things better? This thesis explores some of these difficult but important issues, describes serious Ingrid Wolfe problems in child health, and offers recommendations for European countries to ensure a healthier future for children. 2015:24 ISBN 978-91-7063-637-0 Faculty of Health, Science and Technology ISSN 1403-8099 Public Health Science DISSERTATION | Karlstad University Studies | 2015:24 DISSERTATION | Karlstad University Studies | 2015:24 Child Health, Health Services and Systems in UK and other European countries Ingrid Wolfe DISSERTATION | Karlstad University Studies | 2015:24 Child Health, Health Services and Systems in UK and other European countries Ingrid Wolfe DISSERTATION Karlstad University Studies | 2015:24 urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-35856 ISSN 1403-8099 ISBN 978-91-7063-637-0 © The author Distribution: Karlstad University Faculty of Health, Science and Technology Department of Health Sciences SE-651 88 Karlstad, Sweden +46 54 700 10 00 Print: Universitetstryckeriet, Karlstad 2015 WWW.KAU.SE PREFACE I am a paediatrician and a public health doctor, and these two strands of my work came together and were enriched by developing an interest in children’s health services, systems, and policy research in the UK and Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Mistakes and Miscarriages of Justice: Perspectives on the Experiences in England and Wales
    Medical mistakes and miscarriages of justice: Perspectives on the experiences in England and Wales * Kathryn Campbell and Clive Walker A Introduction Errors made by pathologists reporting in criminal cases on sudden deaths of infants have resulted in serial miscarriages of justice in the United Kingdom. These types of mistakes are exceptionally grievous for bereaved families, for the credibility of experts, and for the standing of the justice system itself. Conclusions presented by experts at trial are often cloaked in dense scientific language which serves to imply that such results and testimony are factually unassailable, but in reality, these conclusions have been found to be interpretations affected by subjective inferences and shoddy case construction. Despite the high costs of such errors, the problem of miscarriages of justice has persisted, for various reasons. Contemporary developments in sciences, particularly forensic sciences, have resulted in an increase in appearances by experts before the courts and a growing pressure to seek out forensic evidence. In some cases, experts have become not only notable figures in their profession, but also renowned witnesses, appearing in one case after another, with their evidence becoming more irrefutable as time passes. The focus of this paper is an examination of the designation and work of medical experts, how they relate to courts in England and Wales, and the impact of their testimony on convictions. This survey will include an overview of how these types of experts are so designated by various regulatory bodies and how the limits of their expertise are determined. It is necessary to consider how both prosecution and defence * Kathryn M.
    [Show full text]
  • Paediatric and Lifecourse Epidemiology Research Group
    School of Clinical Medical Sciences Paediatric and Lifecourse Epidemiology Research Group Report 2002-2004 Contents Foreword.............................................................................................................................................4 The Paediatric and Lifecourse Epidemiology Research Group ...................................................5 Introduction........................................................................................................................................6 Who we are .....................................................................................................................................6 What we do .....................................................................................................................................6 Staff List (Past and Present)..............................................................................................................7 Academic Research Staff...............................................................................................................7 Support Staff...................................................................................................................................9 Research Students ........................................................................................................................10 External Roles and Responsibilities ...............................................................................................11 Local, National and International Roles and
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Proceedings
    273 Court 24th March 2006 MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS at the Ninth Meeting of the COURT of the IMPERIAL COLLEGE OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND MEDICINE The Ninth Meeting of the Court of Imperial College was held in Lecture Theatre G.34, the Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus at 2:15 p.m. on Friday, 24th March 2006, when there were present: The Lord Kerr of Kinlochard (Chairman), Mr. G. Able, Mr. T. Aplin, Dr. A. Arnold- Smith, Mrs. A. Barrett, Professor J.N.B. Bell, M.C. Black Esq., The Revd. G. Blacktop, Dr. K.B. Broda, Dr. E. Buttle CBE, Professor P.Y.K. Cheung, Cllr. J. Corbet-Singleton CBE, Mrs. P. Couttie, Dr. J. Domin, Mr. D.R.L. Duncan, Mr. C. Edge, Mr. B. Gidoomal CBE, Professor M. Green, Professor D.S. Griffiths, Professor D.J. Hand, Professor C.L. Hankin, Ms. S. Hartman, Mr. M. Heath, Professor R. Himsworth, Professor S.R. Hirsch, Professor E.D. Hondros, Mr. L. Hui, Cllr. J. Hyde, Mr. N.A. Joseph, Professor C. Kennard, Ms. S Khatib, Professor J. King CBE, Dr. M.P. Knight, Professor Sir Peter Knight, Mr. R.R. Knowland CBE, Mr. D.K. Kulatilleke, Professor S. Macchietto, Mr. P. Madden, Dr. T. Maini, Professor Z. Makuch, Professor A.D.B. Malcolm, Cllr. Mrs. A. Mallinson OBE, Mr. S. Matthews, Dr. M.J. McGarvey, Mr. D. McGuinness, Mr. N.G. McMullen, Professor G.H.C. New, Mr. J.H.M. Newsum, Mr. P. Osborne, Cllr. M. Page, Dr. V. Payne, Professor D. Phillips OBE, Professor Dame Julia Polak, Professor R.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Accident Prevention Health Gap (That Is, Health Inequalities) Within England
    LEADING ARTICLE 275 Trauma prevention public health strategy for England ................................................................................... (www.ohn.gov.uk). It was published in Arch Dis Child: first published as 10.1136/adc.88.4.277 on 1 April 2003. Downloaded from July 1999 with the two laudable aims of improving health and reducing the Accident prevention health gap (that is, health inequalities) within England. Four disease processes I Maconochie have been targeted: cancer, coronary ................................................................................... heart disease, mental health, and acci- dents. The target for accidents is: “the A priority for paediatricians reduction in death rates by at least one fifth and to reduce the rate of serious rauma prevention is a neglected area The aim of this leading article is to injury by at least one tenth by 2010”, so from the point of view of coordi- examine the scale of the problem, to saving up to 12 000 lives. nated input by paediatricians at local show what government strategies have The Department of Health set up the T Accidents and Accidental Injury Task level and to an extent at the Royal been developed, what resources are College of Paediatrics and Child Health available, and how paediatricians at local Force. Its terms of reference were to (RCPCH) level. This oversight is surpris- and at RCPCH level help reduce the mor- advise the Chief Medical Officer on: ing given that injury to children is asso- bidity and mortality associated with (1) The most important
    [Show full text]
  • Public Health
    House of Commons Health Committee Public Health Twelfth Report of Session 2010–12 Volume III Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 19 October 2011 Published on 29 November 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Health Committee The Health Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department of Health and its associated bodies. Membership Rt Hon Stephen Dorrell MP (Conservative, Charnwood) (Chair)1 Rosie Cooper MP (Labour, West Lancashire) Yvonne Fovargue MP (Labour, Makerfield) Andrew George MP (Liberal Democrat, St Ives) Grahame M. Morris MP (Labour, Easington) Dr Daniel Poulter MP (Conservative, Central Suffolk and North Ipswich) Mr Virendra Sharma MP (Labour, Ealing Southall) Chris Skidmore MP (Conservative, Kingswood) David Tredinnick MP (Conservative, Bosworth) Valerie Vaz MP (Labour, Walsall South) Dr Sarah Wollaston MP (Conservative, Totnes) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/healthcom. The Reports of the Committee, the formal minutes relating to that report, oral evidence taken and some or all written evidence are available in printed volume(s). Additional written evidence may be published on the internet only.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Sir Alan Craft 303-047-561 Commentary on the Ledwith Report
    A commentary on Dr Michael Ledwith's Report to the Inquiry into Hyponatraemia-related Deaths in Northern Ireland entitled: "A Review of the teaching of fluid balance and sodium management in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland 1975 to 2009" by Professor Sir Alan Craft, Emeritus Professor of Child Health, Newcastle University, England.1 The information contained in the Report, is to the best of my knowledge, true at the time of writing. ~J5t ----- 1305 11 Signed A Craft 1 Curriculum vitae appended to this report. 1 Professor Sir Alan Craft 303-047-561 Commentary on the Ledwith report Dr Ledwith has undertaken a comprehensive review of the teaching of fluid balance in children with particular reference to sodium and hyponah'aemia. He has also produced an addendum dealing with the relationship between doctor and nurse h'aining and the clinical inter relationships between the two professions. He has carried out a review of the training of undergraduate and postgraduate trainees over the period from 1975 to 2009. Although this is mainly from a Northern Ireland, and to some extent all Ireland, perspective it has been set in the context of the rest of the UK. The education of medical students and postgraduate doctors has been governed on a UK wide basis throughout this time period and he correctly refers to the General Medical Council, the Specialist Training Authority, the Postgraduate Education and Training Board and the General Medical Council. Undergraduate Teaching All medical schools in the UK have been, and are, under the overall scrutiny and governance of the General Medical Council.
    [Show full text]