DOCSLIB.ORG

Exploring Spacetime Phenomenology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exploring Spacetime Phenomenology SISSA–INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDIES DOCTORAL THESIS Exploring Spacetime Phenomenology: From Lorentz Violations to Experimental Tests of Non-locality Author: Supervisor: Alessio BELENCHIA Prof. Stefano LIBERATI A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Astroparticle Physics August 31, 2016 iii Declaration of Authorship The research presented in this thesis was mainly conducted in SISSA – International School for Advanced Studies between September 2012 and June 2016. This thesis is the result of the author own work, as well as the outcome of scientific collaborations stated below, except where explicit ref- erence is made to the results of others. The content of this thesis is based on the following research papers published in refereed Journals, conference proceedings or preprints available on arxiv.org: A. Belenchia, S. Liberati, and A. Mohd • Emergent gravitational dynamics in a relativistic Bose-Einstein condensate In: Phys. Rev. D90.10, p. 104015, arXiv: 1407.7896 [gr-qc]. A. Belenchia, D.M.T. Benincasa, and S. Liberati • Nonlocal Scalar Quantum Field Theory from Causal Sets In: JHEP 03, p. 036. arXiv: 1411.6513 [gr-qc]. A. Belenchia, D.M.T. Benincasa, A. Marcianó, and L. Modesto • Spectral Dimension from Causal Set Nonlocal Dynamics In: Phys.Rev. D93 (2016) 044017, arXiv: 1507.00330 [gr-qc] A. Belenchia, A. Gambassi and S. Liberati • Lorentz violation naturalness revisited In: JHEP (2016), arXiv: 1601.06700 [hep-th] A. Belenchia, D.M.T. Benincasa, Stefano Liberati, Francesco Marin, • Francesco Marino, and Antonello Ortolan Tests of Quantum Gravity induced non-locality via opto-mechanical quan- tum oscillators In: Phys.Rev.Lett.116 (2016), arXiv: 1512.02083 [gr-qc] A. Belenchia, • Universal behaviour of generalized Causal-set d’Alembertian in curved space- time In: Class.Quant.Grav. (2016), arXiv: 1510.04665 [gr-qc] A. Belenchia, D.M.T. Benincasa, and F. Dowker • The continuum limit of a 4-dimensional causal set scalar d’Alembertian In: arXiv: 1510.04656 [gr-qc] A. Belenchia • Causal set, non-locality and phenomenology In: arXiv:1512.08485 [gr-qc], To appear in the proceedings of the 14th Mar- cel Grossmann meeting, Rome (July, 2015) A. Belenchia, D.M.T. Benincasa, E. Martin-Martinez and M. Saravani • Low-Energy Signatures of Non-Local Field Theories Accepted in: PRD rapid communication; In: arXiv:1605.0397 v “A mathematical friend of mine said to me the other day half in jest: “The math- ematician can do a lot of things, but never what you happen to want him to do just at the moment.” Much the same often applies to the theoretical physicist when the experimental physicist calls him in. What is the reason for this peculiar lack of adaptability?” Albert Einstein vii SISSA–INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDIES Abstract Doctor of Philosophy Exploring Spacetime Phenomenology: From Lorentz Violations to Experimental Tests of Non-locality by Alessio BELENCHIA This thesis deals primarily with the phenomenology associated to quan- tum aspects of spacetime. In particular, it aims at exploring the phenomeno- logical consequences of a fundamental discreteness of the spacetime fabric, as predicted by several quantum gravity models and strongly hinted by many theoretical insights. The first part of this work considers a toy-model of emergent spacetime in the context of analogue gravity. The way in which a relativistic Bose– Einstein condensate can mimic, under specific configurations, the dynamics of a scalar theory of gravity will be investigated. This constitutes proof-of- concept that a legitimate dynamical Lorentzian spacetime may emerge from non-gravitational (discrete) degrees of freedom. Remarkably, this model will emphasize the fact that in general, even when arising from a relativis- tic system, any emergent spacetime is prone to show deviations from exact Lorentz invariance. This will lead us to consider Lorentz Invariance Viola- tions as first candidate for a discrete spacetime phenomenology. Having reviewed the current constraints on Lorentz Violations and stud- ied in depth viable resolutions of their apparent naturalness problem, the second part of this thesis focusses on models based on Lorentz invariance. In the context of Casual Set theory, the coexistence of Lorentz invariance and discreteness leads to an inherently nonlocal scalar field theory over causal sets well approximating a continuum spacetime. The quantum as- pects of the theory in flat spacetime will be studied and the consequences of its non-locality will be spelled out. Noticeably, these studies will lend support to a possible dimensional reduction at small scales and, in a clas- sical setting, show that the scalar field is characterized by a universal non- minimal coupling when considered in curved spacetimes. Finally, the phenomenological possibilities for detecting this non-locality will be investigated. First, by considering the related spontaneous emission of particle detectors, then by developing a phenomenological model to test nonlocal effects using opto-mechanical, non-relativistic systems. In both cases, one could be able to cast in the near future stringent bounds on the non-locality scale. ix Acknowledgements There are several people that I want to thank. First of all, my supervisor Stefano Liberati for his guide in these four years, his patience, advices and helpful suggestions. I am much indebted to my other wonderful collabo- rator, and friend, Dionigi Benincasa who has shared with me most of these four years and guided me. I have to thank also Arif Mohd, Fay Dowker and Eduardo Martin-Martinez for fruitful collaborations and discussions. I want to thank Marco, Mauro, Bruno, Federico, Giovanni, Cristiano, Eolo, Guillaume, Elena, Serena, Kate, Claudia, Fiamma, Giovanna and Cristina and all the other friends I have met in SISSA and Trieste in these years. It has been wonderful to share with them the days of the PhD and for sure I will miss them as well as this wonderful city. A special thanks goes to Clara, with which I share beautiful memories more than with everyone else, even if our paths have unfortunately grown apart. Of course, all this would not have been possible without the constant support of my family during the years of the University and Ph.D: my mother Nadia, my father Sirio, my sister Tania and her soul-mate Paolo, my aunts, uncles and cousins (also my dog Charlie which is with us since 17 years). They have been a constant presence in these years. I owe them everything, and for this I dedicate this thesis to them. xi Contents Declaration of Authorship iii Abstract vii Acknowledgements ix Preface1 1 Introduction5 1.1 Quantum Gravity and Phenomenology............5 1.1.1 Discreteness of spacetime................7 1.2 Analogue Gravity.........................9 1.2.1 The ancestor of all analogue models..........9 1.2.2 Bose–Einstein condensate analogue.......... 10 1.2.3 Emergent dynamics?................... 14 1.3 Lorentz Invariance Violations.................. 15 1.3.1 An experimental window on Quantum Gravity... 16 1.3.2 The naturalness problem of LIV............ 17 1.4 Causal Set Theory and Non-Locality.............. 19 1.4.1 Kinematics......................... 20 1.4.2 Lorentz Invariance and Non-locality.......... 20 1.4.3 CS Phenomenology (so far)............... 23 1.4.4 Dynamics......................... 24 2 Analogue Gravity as a toy model of Emergent spacetime 25 2.1 Complex scalar field theory: relativistic BEC......... 26 2.2 Relativistic BEC as an analogue gravity model........ 28 2.2.1 Dynamics of perturbations: acoustic metric..... 29 2.3 Relation to previous results................... 29 2.4 Emergent Nordström gravity.................. 31 2.4.1 Stress Energy Tensor and Newton constant...... 33 2.5 Summary.............................. 35 2.6 Discussion............................. 35 3 Lorentz Invariance Violations naturalness 39 3.1 LIV percolation: previous results................ 40 3.1.1 LI case........................... 42 3.1.2 LIV case.......................... 43 3.2 Fermion self-energy........................ 46 3.2.1 Particles with equal masses (R = 1) and same viola- tion (f = f~)........................ 49 3.2.2 Particles with different masses (R = 1) and same vio- 6 lation (f = f~)....................... 50 3.2.3 Violation only on the scalar field (f~ = 1)........ 50 xii 3.3 Separation of scales........................ 51 3.3.1 Sharp LI cutoff...................... 52 3.3.2 Smooth LI cutoff..................... 54 3.4 Dissipation and LIV naturalness................ 56 3.4.1 The general setting.................... 58 3.4.2 Sharp LI cutoff...................... 59 3.4.3 Smooth LI cutoff..................... 61 3.5 Summary and Discussion.................... 61 4 Causal Set theory and Non-locality 65 4.1 Nonlocal d’Alembertians..................... 66 4.2 Massive Extension: Nonlocal Klein-Gordon Equation.... 72 4.3 Huygens’ Principle and the Nonlocal d’Alembertians.... 73 4.4 Free Scalar Nonlocal QFT.................... 75 4.4.1 2 Dimensions....................... 78 4.4.2 4 Dimensions....................... 81 4.4.3 Renormalisation..................... 86 4.5 Summary and Outlook...................... 86 5 Curved Spacetime and Dimensional reduction in CS theory 89 5.1 Curved Spacetime d’Alembertians............... 89 5.1.1 General set-up...................... 90 5.1.2 Universality of R=2 factor:............... 94 − 5.1.3 Summary......................... 100 5.2 Dimensional Reduction...................... 101 5.2.1 Momentum Space Nonlocal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Symmetry and Gravity
    universe Article Making a Quantum Universe: Symmetry and Gravity Houri Ziaeepour 1,2 1 Institut UTINAM, CNRS UMR 6213, Observatoire de Besançon, Université de Franche Compté, 41 bis ave. de l’Observatoire, BP 1615, 25010 Besançon, France; [email protected] or [email protected] 2 Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, Holmbury St. Mary, Dorking GU5 6NT, UK Received: 05 September 2020; Accepted: 17 October 2020; Published: 23 October 2020 Abstract: So far, none of attempts to quantize gravity has led to a satisfactory model that not only describe gravity in the realm of a quantum world, but also its relation to elementary particles and other fundamental forces. Here, we outline the preliminary results for a model of quantum universe, in which gravity is fundamentally and by construction quantic. The model is based on three well motivated assumptions with compelling observational and theoretical evidence: quantum mechanics is valid at all scales; quantum systems are described by their symmetries; universe has infinite independent degrees of freedom. The last assumption means that the Hilbert space of the Universe has SUpN Ñ 8q – area preserving Diff.pS2q symmetry, which is parameterized by two angular variables. We show that, in the absence of a background spacetime, this Universe is trivial and static. Nonetheless, quantum fluctuations break the symmetry and divide the Universe to subsystems. When a subsystem is singled out as reference—observer—and another as clock, two more continuous parameters arise, which can be interpreted as distance and time. We identify the classical spacetime with parameter space of the Hilbert space of the Universe.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergence and Phenomenology in Quantum Gravity
    Emergence and Phenomenology in Quantum Gravity by Isabeau Premont-Schwarz´ A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2010 © Isabeau Premont-Schwarz´ 2010 AUTHOR’S DECLARATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii AUTHORSHIP STATEMENT This thesis is based on the following five articles: • A. Hamma, F. Markopoulou, I. Pr´emont-Schwarz and S. Severini, “Lieb-Robinson bounds and the speed of light from topological order,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 017204 [arXiv:0808.2495 [quant-ph]]. • I. Pr´emont-Schwarz ,A. Hamma, I. Klich and F. Markopoulou, “Lieb-Robinson bounds for commutator-bounded operators ,” Phys. Rev. A 81, 040102(R) (2010) .[arXiv:0912.4544 [quant-ph]]. • I. Pr´emont-Schwarz and J. Hnybida, “Lieb-Robinson bounds with dependence on interaction strengths, ” [arXiv:1002.4190 [math-ph]]. • L. Modesto and I. Pr´emont-Schwarz, “Self-dual Black Holes in LQG: Theory and Phenomenology,” Phys. Rev. D 80, 064041 (2009) [arXiv:0905.3170 [hep-th]]. • S. Hossenfelder, L. Modesto and I. Pr´emont-Schwarz, “A model for non-singular black hole collapse and evaporation ,” Phys. Rev. D 81, 044036 (2010) [arXiv:0912.1823 [gr-qc]]. I did the majority of the work in the first article, but the project was initiated by Fotini Markopoulou-Kalamara and Alioscia Hamma and the manuscript was mostly written by Alioscia Hamma.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Soldiers by Michael Riordan
    Old soldiers by Michael Riordan Twenty years ago this month, an this deep inelastic region in excru­ experiment began at the Stanford ciating detail, the new quark-parton Linear Accelerator Center in Cali­ picture of a nucleon's innards fornia that would eventually redraw gradually took a firmer and firmer the map of high energy physics. hold upon the particle physics com­ In October 1967, MIT and SLAC munity. These two massive spec­ physicists started shaking down trometers were our principal 'eyes' their new 20 GeV spectrometer; into the new realm, by far the best by mid-December they were log­ ones we had until more powerful ging electron-proton scattering in muon and neutrino beams became the so-called deep inelastic region available at Fermilab and CERN. where the electrons probed deep They were our Geiger and Marsd- inside the protons. The huge ex­ en, reporting back to Rutherford cess of scattered electrons they the detailed patterns of ricocheting encountered there-about ten times projectiles. Through their magnetic the expected rate-was later inter­ lenses we 'observed' quarks for preted as evidence for pointlike, the very first time, hard 'pits' inside fractionally charged objects inside hadrons. the proton. These two goliaths stood reso­ Michael Riordan (above) did The quarks we take for granted lutely at the front as a scientific research using the 8 GeV today were at best 'mathematical' revolution erupted all about them spectrometer at SLAC as an entities in 1967 - if one allowed during the late 1960s and early MIT graduate student during them any true existence at all.
    [Show full text]
  • Jhep09(2019)100
    Published for SISSA by Springer Received: July 29, 2019 Accepted: September 5, 2019 Published: September 12, 2019 A link that matters: towards phenomenological tests of unimodular asymptotic safety JHEP09(2019)100 Gustavo P. de Brito,a;b Astrid Eichhornc;b and Antonio D. Pereirad;b aCentro Brasileiro de Pesquisas F´ısicas (CBPF), Rua Dr Xavier Sigaud 150, Urca, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, CEP 22290-180 bInstitute for Theoretical Physics, University of Heidelberg, Philosophenweg 16, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany cCP3-Origins, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark dInstituto de F´ısica, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Campus da Praia Vermelha, Av. Litor^anea s/n, 24210-346, Niter´oi,RJ, Brazil E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: Constraining quantum gravity from observations is a challenge. We expand on the idea that the interplay of quantum gravity with matter could be key to meeting this challenge. Thus, we set out to confront different potential candidates for quantum gravity | unimodular asymptotic safety, Weyl-squared gravity and asymptotically safe gravity | with constraints arising from demanding an ultraviolet complete Standard Model. Specif- ically, we show that within approximations, demanding that quantum gravity solves the Landau-pole problems in Abelian gauge couplings and Yukawa couplings strongly con- strains the viable gravitational parameter space. In the case of Weyl-squared gravity with a dimensionless gravitational coupling, we also investigate whether the gravitational con- tribution to beta functions in the matter sector calculated from functional Renormalization Group techniques is universal, by studying the dependence on the regulator, metric field parameterization and choice of gauge.
    [Show full text]
  • Sabine Hossenfelder on “The Case Against Beauty in Physics” Julia
    Rationally Speaking #211: Sabine Hossenfelder on “The case against beauty in physics” Julia: Welcome to Rationally Speaking, the podcast where we explore the borderlands between reason and nonsense. I'm your host, Julia Galef, and I'm here with today's guest, Sabine Hossenfelder. Sabine is a theoretical physicist, focusing on quantum gravity. She's a research fellow at the Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, and blogs at Back Reaction. She just published the book, "Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray." "Lost in Math” argues that physicists, in at least certain sub-fields, evaluate theories based heavily on aesthetics, like is this theory beautiful? Instead of simply, what does the evidence suggest is true? The book is full of interviews Sabine did with top physicists, where she tries to ask them: what's the justification for this? Why should we expect beauty to be a good guide to truth? And, spoiler alert, ultimately, she comes away rather unsatisfied with the answers. So, we're going to talk about "Lost in Math" and the case for and against beauty in physics. Sabine, welcome to the show. Sabine: Hello. Julia: So, probably best to start with: what do you mean by beauty, in this context? And is it closer to a kind of “beauty is in the eye of the beholder” thing, like, every physicist has their own sort of aesthetic sense? Or is more like there's a consensus among physicists about what constitutes a beautiful theory? Sabine: Interestingly enough, there's mostly consensus about it. Let me put ahead that I will not try to tell anyone what beauty means, I am just trying to summarize what physicists seem to mean when they speak of beauty, when they say “that theory is beautiful.” There are several ingredients to this sense of beauty.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Axioms of Causal Set Theory
    On the Axioms of Causal Set Theory Benjamin F. Dribus Louisiana State University [email protected] November 8, 2013 Abstract Causal set theory is a promising attempt to model fundamental spacetime structure in a discrete order-theoretic context via sets equipped with special binary relations, called causal sets. The el- ements of a causal set are taken to represent spacetime events, while its binary relation is taken to encode causal relations between pairs of events. Causal set theory was introduced in 1987 by Bombelli, Lee, Meyer, and Sorkin, motivated by results of Hawking and Malament relating the causal, conformal, and metric structures of relativistic spacetime, together with earlier work on discrete causal theory by Finkelstein, Myrheim, and 't Hooft. Sorkin has coined the phrase, \order plus number equals geometry," to summarize the causal set viewpoint regarding the roles of causal structure and discreteness in the emergence of spacetime geometry. This phrase represents a specific version of what I refer to as the causal metric hypothesis, which is the idea that the properties of the physical universe, and in particular, the metric properties of classical spacetime, arise from causal structure at the fundamental scale. Causal set theory may be expressed in terms of six axioms: the binary axiom, the measure axiom, countability, transitivity, interval finiteness, and irreflexivity. The first three axioms, which fix the physical interpretation of a causal set, and restrict its \size," appear in the literature either implic- itly, or as part of the preliminary definition of a causal set. The last three axioms, which encode the essential mathematical structure of a causal set, appear in the literature as the irreflexive formula- tion of causal set theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanics Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD)
    Quantum Mechanics_quantum chromodynamics (QCD) In theoretical physics, quantum chromodynamics (QCD) is a theory ofstrong interactions, a fundamental forcedescribing the interactions between quarksand gluons which make up hadrons such as the proton, neutron and pion. QCD is a type of Quantum field theory called a non- abelian gauge theory with symmetry group SU(3). The QCD analog of electric charge is a property called 'color'. Gluons are the force carrier of the theory, like photons are for the electromagnetic force in quantum electrodynamics. The theory is an important part of the Standard Model of Particle physics. A huge body of experimental evidence for QCD has been gathered over the years. QCD enjoys two peculiar properties: Confinement, which means that the force between quarks does not diminish as they are separated. Because of this, when you do split the quark the energy is enough to create another quark thus creating another quark pair; they are forever bound into hadrons such as theproton and the neutron or the pion and kaon. Although analytically unproven, confinement is widely believed to be true because it explains the consistent failure of free quark searches, and it is easy to demonstrate in lattice QCD. Asymptotic freedom, which means that in very high-energy reactions, quarks and gluons interact very weakly creating a quark–gluon plasma. This prediction of QCD was first discovered in the early 1970s by David Politzer and by Frank Wilczek and David Gross. For this work they were awarded the 2004 Nobel Prize in Physics. There is no known phase-transition line separating these two properties; confinement is dominant in low-energy scales but, as energy increases, asymptotic freedom becomes dominant.
    [Show full text]
  • A Natural Introduction to Fine-Tuning
    A Natural Introduction to Fine-Tuning Julian De Vuyst ∗ Department of Physics & Astronomy, Ghent University, Krijgslaan, S9, 9000 Ghent, Belgium Abstract A well-known topic within the philosophy of physics is the problem of fine-tuning: the fact that the universal constants seem to take non-arbitrary values in order for live to thrive in our Universe. In this paper we will talk about this problem in general, giving some examples from physics. We will review some solutions like the design argument, logical probability, cosmological natural selection, etc. Moreover, we will also discuss why it's dangerous to uphold the Principle of Naturalness as a scientific principle. After going through this paper, the reader should have a general idea what this problem exactly entails whenever it is mentioned in other sources and we recommend the reader to think critically about these concepts. arXiv:2012.05617v1 [physics.hist-ph] 10 Dec 2020 ∗[email protected] 1 Contents 1 Introduction3 2 A Take on Constants3 2.I The Role of Units . .4 2.II Derived vs Fundamental Constants . .5 3 The Concept of Naturalness6 3.I Technical Naturalness . .6 3.I.a A Wilsonian Perspective . .6 3.I.b A Brief History . .8 3.II Numerical/General Naturalness . .9 4 The Fine-Tuning Problem9 5 Some Examples from Physics 10 5.I The Cosmological Constant Problem . 10 5.II The Flatness Problem . 11 5.III The Higgs Mass . 12 5.IV The Strong CP Problem . 13 6 Resolutions to Fine-Tuning 14 6.I We are here, full stop . 14 6.II Designed like Clockwork .
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Information on the Nobel Prize in Physics, 5 October 2004
    Advanced information on the Nobel Prize in Physics, 5 October 2004 Information Department, P.O. Box 50005, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden Phone: +46 8 673 95 00, Fax: +46 8 15 56 70, E-mail: [email protected], Website: www.kva.se Asymptotic Freedom and Quantum ChromoDynamics: the Key to the Understanding of the Strong Nuclear Forces The Basic Forces in Nature We know of two fundamental forces on the macroscopic scale that we experience in daily life: the gravitational force that binds our solar system together and keeps us on earth, and the electromagnetic force between electrically charged objects. Both are mediated over a distance and the force is proportional to the inverse square of the distance between the objects. Isaac Newton described the gravitational force in his Principia in 1687, and in 1915 Albert Einstein (Nobel Prize, 1921 for the photoelectric effect) presented his General Theory of Relativity for the gravitational force, which generalized Newton’s theory. Einstein’s theory is perhaps the greatest achievement in the history of science and the most celebrated one. The laws for the electromagnetic force were formulated by James Clark Maxwell in 1873, also a great leap forward in human endeavour. With the advent of quantum mechanics in the first decades of the 20th century it was realized that the electromagnetic field, including light, is quantized and can be seen as a stream of particles, photons. In this picture, the electromagnetic force can be thought of as a bombardment of photons, as when one object is thrown to another to transmit a force.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strong and Weak Senses of Theory-Ladenness of Experimentation: Theory-Driven Versus Exploratory Experiments in the History of High-Energy Particle Physics
    [Accepted for Publication in Science in Context] The Strong and Weak Senses of Theory-Ladenness of Experimentation: Theory-Driven versus Exploratory Experiments in the History of High-Energy Particle Physics Koray Karaca University of Wuppertal Interdisciplinary Centre for Science and Technology Studies (IZWT) University of Wuppertal Gaußstr. 20 42119 Wuppertal, Germany [email protected] Argument In the theory-dominated view of scientific experimentation, all relations of theory and experiment are taken on a par; namely, that experiments are performed solely to ascertain the conclusions of scientific theories. As a result, different aspects of experimentation and of the relation of theory to experiment remain undifferentiated. This in turn fosters a notion of theory- ladenness of experimentation (TLE) that is too coarse-grained to accurately describe the relations of theory and experiment in scientific practice. By contrast, in this article, I suggest that TLE should be understood as an umbrella concept that has different senses. To this end, I introduce a three-fold distinction among the theories of high-energy particle physics (HEP) as background theories, model theories and phenomenological models. Drawing on this categorization, I contrast two types of experimentation, namely, “theory-driven” and “exploratory” experiments, and I distinguish between the “weak” and “strong” senses of TLE in the context of scattering experiments from the history of HEP. This distinction enables to identify the exploratory character of the deep-inelastic electron-proton scattering experiments— performed at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (SLAC) between the years 1967 and 1973—thereby shedding light on a crucial phase of the history of HEP, namely, the discovery of “scaling”, which was the decisive step towards the construction of quantum chromo-dynamics (QCD) as a gauge theory of strong interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Members Elect Barry Barish As Next APS Vice-President
    October 2008 Volume 17, No. 9 www.aps.org/publications/apsnews 21st Century Campaign Nears Goal APS NEWS and Needs Your Support! A PublicAtion of the AmericAn PhysicAl society • www.APs.org/PublicAtions/APsnews (See insert) Energy Efficiency Crucial to Achieving Energy Security Members Elect Barry Barish and Reducing Global Warming, States APS Report as next APS Vice-President Tapping wasted energy from miles per gallon mileage for cars needs because they require sig- APS members have elected in physics from the University of inefficient automobiles, homes and and other light-duty vehicles by nificant scientific and engineering Barry Barish, Linde Professor of California, Berkeley. He joined businesses is equivalent to discov- 2030 and the elimination of energy breakthroughs in several critical Physics Emeritus at Caltech, as the faculty at Caltech in 1963. ering a hidden energy reserve that from fossil fuels in new residential areas. the Society’s next vice president. Among his noteworthy experi- will help the United States improve buildings by 2020. The study also calls on Congress Barish will assume the office in ments were those performed at its energy security and reduce glob- and the White House to increase January 2009. At the same time, Fermilab using high-energy neu- al warming, an APS study panel has spending on research and develop- Curtis Callan of trino collisions to concluded. ment of next-generation building Princeton Univer- reveal the quark Their report, Energy Future: technologies, training scientists sity will become substructure of Think Efficiency, states that the key who work on building technologies president-elect, and the nucleon.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantized Vortices in Superfluid Dark Matter
    Quantized Vortices in Superfluid Dark Matter Renate Mauland Master’s Thesis, Spring 2019 ii Copyright c 2019, Renate Mauland This work, entitled “Quantized Vortices in Superfluid Dark Matter” is distributed under the terms of the Public Library of Science Open Access License, a copy of which can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright. Cover Photo: Open Source Image from www.pexels.com. Abstract In a recent paper by Berezhiani and Khoury [1], a superfluid dark matter (DM) model was presented. The model consists of light axion-like DM particles (m ∼ eV), which condense and form a superfluid at galactic scales. The superfluid exhibits collective excitations known as phonons, which interact with baryons and mediate a force similar to that of Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND). The superfluid DM model therefore combines the success of MOND at small scales with that of the ΛCDM model at large scales. By analogy with superfluids studied in the lab, we expect a grid of vortices with quantized circulation to form in a rotating galaxy containing superfluid DM. In this thesis, we explore the properties of the superfluid DM vortices and their impact on the surroundings. We find that the vortex cores are small, 10−4 − 10−3 m, and that the vortices are separated by vast distances, ∼ 0:002 AU. The viable parameter space of the model is found to be substantial, and a reduction in the DM particle mass results in larger vortices with a higher energy. Yet, no combination of parameters explored here give vortices energetic enough to have a noticeable effect on the galaxy as a whole.
    [Show full text]