The Politics of Ruinous Compassion: How Seattle's Homelessness Policy Perpetuates the Crisis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Politics of Ruinous Compassion: How Seattle's Homelessness Policy Perpetuates the Crisis The Politics of Ruinous Compassion: How Seattle’s Homelessness Policy Perpetuates the Crisis — And How We Can Fix It Christopher F. Rufo ABstract The City of Seattle has failed to address its current KEY POINTS homelessness crisis. In fact, because of ideological capture and poor public policy, the city has created • Seattle spends $1 billion per year on a system of perverse incentives that has only made the crisis, but homelessness continues the problem worse. In order to truly confront the to grow problem of homelessness, the city’s leadership must embrace a policy of realism: dismantle the system of • Seattle’s policy of “unlimited compas- perverse incentives, quickly build emergency shelter, sion” has enabled street homelessness and enforce the law against public camping and and made the problem worse drug use. Ultimately, the city currently has enough • The main driver of homelessness is not resources to solve the crisis—it needs to summon rising rents, but a combination of eco- the political courage to make the right choices. nomic dislocation, addiction, mental illness, in-migration, and broken rela- *** tionships • Seattle’s public policy has created a SEATTLE is a city under siege. Over the system of perverse incentives and an past 4ive years, the Emerald City has endured a unaccountable homelessness bureau- cracy that has failed to show results slow-rolling explosion of homelessness, crime, and addiction. In a one-night count this winter, there were 11,643 people sleeping in tents, POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS cars, and emergency shelters.1 Property crime • Immediately build emergency shelters has skyrocketed to rates two-and-a-half times with 2,500 beds with on-site addic- that of Los Angeles and four times that of New tion, mental health, and medical ser- York City. 2 Cleanup crews pick up tens of thou- vices sands of dirty needles from the streets and • Empower law enforcement to move parks across the city.3 the street homeless into shelter and At the same time, according to the enforce a strict ban on public camp- Puget Sound Business Journal, the Seattle ing metro area spends more than $1 billion on the • End policies that create perverse in- homelessness crisis every year.4 That’s nearly centives for service providers and $100,000 for every homeless man, woman, break up the “homeless-industrial and child in King County, yet the crisis seems complex” to only have deepened, with more addiction, • Recognize that the true cause of more crime, and more tent encampments stak- homelessness is disaffiliation and the loss of human relationships ing their claim in residential neighborhoods. By any measurement, whatever the city is do- !1 ing now is not working. d’état. The socialist revolutionaries, once rele- Over the past year, I’ve spent time in gated to the margins, have declared open war city council meetings, political rallies, home- on the mainstream Democratic establishment less encampments, and rehabilitation facilities and pushed the political center of gravity ever hoping to understand this paradox: how is it leftward. possible that the government spends so much The leader of this faction, Socialist Al- money and, at the same time, makes so little ternative city councilwoman Kshama Sawant, impact? While most of the debate on home- is a scorched-earth warrior against capitalism. lessness has focused on the technical ques- In her telling, capitalism is the single cause tions that make up the superstructure of our from which all problems emerge. She claims public policy — should we build more shel- that homelessness is the inevitable result of ters, should we build supervised injection sites the Amazon boom, greedy landlords, and — I learned that in order to truly unravel this rapidly increasing rents.6 As she told Street paradox, we must to examine the deeper as- Roots News: “The explosion of the homeless- sumptions and beliefs that have come to shape ness crisis is a symptom of how deeply dys- the way we think about homelessness in cities functional capitalism is and also how much like Seattle. worse living standards have gotten with the As I delved into the story, I discovered last several decades.”7 In this story, the ruth- that the real battle isn’t being waged in the less capitalists of Amazon, Starbucks, Mi- tents, under the bridges, or in the corridors of crosoft, and Boeing generate tremendous City Hall. Rather, there’s a deeper, ideological amounts of wealth for themselves, drive up the war that’s currently being won by a loose al- price of housing, and push the working class liance of four major power centers: the social- irreversibly towards poverty, inequality, and ist intellectuals, the compassion brigades, the despair. homeless-industrial complex, and the addic- On the surface, this argument has its tion evangelists. Together, these four groups own internal logic: landlords raise the rent, have framed the political debate, diverted low-wage workers are priced out of their hundreds of millions of dollars towards fa- apartments, and their families fall into home- vored projects, and recruited a large phalanx lessness. They point to the Zillow8 and McKin- of well-intentioned voters who have bought sey9 studies that show a high correlation be- into the “politics of unlimited compassion.” tween rent increases and homelessness in If we want to truly break through the Seattle. But, in reality, correlation is not causa- failed status quo on homelessness in places tion and the individual survey data paints a like Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, and Los remarkably different picture. According to Angeles, we must 4irst understand the dynam- King County's point-in-time study, only 6% of ics of ideological battleield, identify the fatal the homeless cited “could not afford rent in- 4laws in our current policies, and fundamental- crease” as the precipitating cause of their ly reframe the way we understand the crisis. predicament.10 They specify a wide range of Until then, we’ll continue to dream up utopian other problems — domestic violence, incar- schemes that end in failure and despair. ceration, mental illness, family con4lict, med- ical conditions, breakups, eviction, addiction, The Socialist Revolutionaries and job loss — as greater contributors to be- coming homeless. Seattle has long been well-known as Furthermore, although the Zillow study one of the most liberal cities in America.5 But did indeed ind a high correlation between ris- over the past few years, there’s been a coup ing rents and homelessness in four major !2 markets — Seattle, Los Angeles, New York, and solve the homelessness crisis. Even with Washington, DC — it also found that home- Sawant’s recently passed (and then repealed) lessness decreased despite rising rents in "jobs tax" on large employers,11 the city would Houston, Tampa, Chicago, Phoenix, St. Louis, only build a maximum of 187 subsidized hous- San Diego, Portland, Detroit, Baltimore, At- ing units per year, which means it will take at lanta, Charlotte, and Riverside. While rent in- least sixty years to provide housing for all of creases are a very real burden for the working the individuals who are currently homeless. I poor, the evidence suggests that rent increases suspect, however, that Sawant’s real passion is alone do not push people onto the streets. not to build houses for the poor, but to tear In fact, even in an expensive city like down the houses of the rich. Once her new Seattle, the vast majority of working- and taxes fail to usher in the socialist utopia, she middle-class residents manage to respond to will simply 4ind a new scapegoat — corpora- economic incentives in a number of common tions, real estate developers, tech workers, po- sense ways: moving to a less expensive neigh- lice of4icers — and repeat the process all over borhood, downsizing to a smaller apartment, again. taking on a roommate, moving in with family, The hard truth is that Seattle is now an or leaving the city altogether. The reality is expensive city. The local government should that there are more than 1 million people in absolutely strive to create more affordable King County below the median income and market-rate housing by increasing density and 99% of them manage to 4ind a place to live and changing zoning laws,12 but, given the current pay the rent on time. The static aggregate-level reality, for those who are not employed full analyses from Zillow and McKinsey do not time — which is the case for 92.5% of the take into account the vast number of options homeless13 — it’s foolish to think that Seattle that are available even to the poorest families will be the city of Housing for All. No matter — and yet, the socialist revolutionaries keep how many impossible promises the socialists hammering away at “the rent is too damn make, at some point, they will run out of other high” as the explanatory variable for every- people’s money. The scapegoats, who have thing. thus far remained silent, will start 4ighting The socialists are playing a deeply cyni- back. And private companies, which are the cal game, using the homelessness crisis as a primary wealth generators in the city, will symbol of “capitalism’s moral failure” and a simply pack up and move away. justiication for their longstanding policy agenda of rent control, public housing, mini- The Compassion BriGades mum wage increases, and punitive corporate taxation. While one might be tempted to dis- The compassion brigades are the moral miss Kshama Sawant as a cartoon subcoman- crusaders of homelessness policy. They are the dante, she has been remarkably successful in social justice activists who believe “compas- her campaign to use the image of the homeless sion” is the highest virtue and all other consid- to stoke resentment against “Amazon tech erations must be subordinated to its dictates.
Recommended publications
  • FAQ: State of Emergency on Homelessness
    FAQ: State of Emergency on Homelessness The City of Seattle, like many other cities across the country, is facing a homelessness crisis. The region’s current needs outweigh shelter capacity, leaving too many seniors, families and individuals sleeping on the street. More than 45 individuals have died while homeless on Seattle streets in 2015 alone. The 2015 One Night Count found 3,772 individuals living outside and unsheltered in King County, a 21 percent increase over 2014. Youth homelessness is also growing rapidly, our Seattle classrooms have nearly 3,000 students without stable housing or shelter. Why are you declaring a state of emergency and what exactly does this entail? How will this one-time investment of $5 million be allocated? How many new shelter beds will this funding provide? How is the City paying for this new investment? How is the City working with state and federal governments to address this issue? How much money was allocated to homelessness support services prior to declaring a state of emergency and why do we need to spend more? What are we doing to help people exit homelessness? What kind of funding is available for families experiencing homelessness? What is being done about unauthorized encampments on public property? What is being done about car camping? How do I report a problem encampment site? What can community members do to help? Page 1 of 5 Why are you declaring a state of emergency and what exactly does this entail? By declaring a state of emergency on homelessness, the City will have more administrative authority and flexibility in contracting for services and allocating resources in response to the homelessness crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory, Market, and Legal Barriers to Export Hearing
    U.S. ENERGY ABUNDANCE: REGULATORY, MARKET, AND LEGAL BARRIERS TO EXPORT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND POWER OF THE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JUNE 18, 2013 Serial No. 113–57 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on Energy and Commerce energycommerce.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 85–447 WASHINGTON : 2014 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 12:20 Jan 27, 2014 Jkt 037690 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 F:\MY DOCS\HEARINGS 113\113-57 CHRIS COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE FRED UPTON, Michigan Chairman RALPH M. HALL, Texas HENRY A. WAXMAN, California JOE BARTON, Texas Ranking Member Chairman Emeritus JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan ED WHITFIELD, Kentucky Chairman Emeritus JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania FRANK PALLONE, JR., New Jersey GREG WALDEN, Oregon BOBBY L. RUSH, Illinois LEE TERRY, Nebraska ANNA G. ESHOO, California MIKE ROGERS, Michigan ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York TIM MURPHY, Pennsylvania GENE GREEN, Texas MICHAEL C. BURGESS, Texas DIANA DEGETTE, Colorado MARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee LOIS CAPPS, California Vice Chairman MICHAEL F. DOYLE, Pennsylvania PHIL GINGREY, Georgia JANICE D. SCHAKOWSKY, Illinois STEVE SCALISE, Louisiana JIM MATHESON, Utah ROBERT E. LATTA, Ohio G.K. BUTTERFIELD, North Carolina CATHY MCMORRIS RODGERS, Washington JOHN BARROW, Georgia GREGG HARPER, Mississippi DORIS O.
    [Show full text]
  • King County and Seattle Homelessness - Some Facts
    King County and Seattle Homelessness - Some Facts Final report | December 15, 2017 CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY Any use of this material without specific permission of McKinsey & Company is strictly prohibited. Media inquiries can be directed to [email protected] Dec 15, 2017. CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY: Any use of this material without specific permission of McKinsey & Company is strictly prohibited. Executive summary ▪ Homelessness continues to be a growing problem in King County and Seattle – ~12K people experiencing homelessness at a point in time growing at 9% annually – ~18-22K1 households access the CRS each year growing at 11% annually ▪ The CRS has improved, but cannot meet inflow demand owing to a shortage of affordable housing options – There is a current gap of 10-14K2 housing options in Seattle and King County ▪ While funding has grown at 2.4% per annum, it has not kept up with growth in aggregate homelessness. To house all households entered in HMIS would take $360-410M3 per annum or about double today’s funding ▪ The housing options, driven primarily by rental subsidies, and associated estimated costs presented in this analysis represents one possible solution. Alternative solutions should be explored including improved governance and accountability for reducing inflows, ensuring stakeholder buy-in and ensuring efficiency and effectiveness of the CRS 1 HMIS data of 21.7K households experiencing homelessness is best available data as suggested by King County. We have used a range of 18.5-21.7K given potential for duplication in the HMIS and CEA systems and those households not meeting the King County definition of homelessness (e.g., doubled-up households) 2 Using the range of 18.5-21.7k homeless households produces a range of 10-14k gap in housing options 3 Using the range of 18.5-21.7k homeless households produces a range of $360-410M in housing costs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Gplex Seattle
    2018 GPLEX SEATTLE Agenda 1 CONNECTING THE CITY OF BROTHERLY LOVE TO THE EMERALD CITY American Airlines is proud to support the Greater Philadelphia Leadership Exchange. 2 2018 GPLEX SEATTLE CONTENTS 4 WELCOME TO THE 2018 LEADERSHIP EXCHANGE 5 AGENDA 8 REGIONAL EXPLORATIONS 10 SPONSORS 12 ABOUT GREATER SEATTLE 14 By the Numbers 18 A Brief History 20 Population 22 Economy 24 Governance 26 Glossary of Seattle Terms 28 PLENARY SPEAKERS 44 LEADERSHIP DELEGATION 60 ABOUT THE ECONOMY LEAGUE 61 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 62 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 64 ESSENTIAL INFORMATION Agenda 3 WELCOME TO THE 2018 LEADERSHIP EXCHANGE I’m excited to be taking part in my fourth GPLEX—and my first as executive director! I was a GPLEX groupie long before I ever imagined I’d be leading this great organization. In any case, I am thrilled to spend a few days with all of you, the movers and shakers who make Greater Philadelphia, well, great. You are among the most diverse cohort we’ve assembled, across both social identity and sector. In GPLEX’s 13th year, we’re incredibly proud to count an alumni base of nearly 1,000 leaders. Stand tall GPLEXers! As always, the board and staff of the Economy League were very deliberate in choosing this year’s destination; we always seek regions that share similarities to our own in size, economy, etc. That said, Seattle is certainly different from Philadelphia. In 1860, while Philadelphia was one of the world’s largest and most economically vibrant cities, the “workshop of the world,” Seattle’s population was about 200 souls; 100 years later, Philadelphia hit its population peak of two million and then saw 50 years of population decline before the slow and steady growth of the late 1990s to the present.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 ANNUAL REPORT Contents
    2017 ANNUAL REPORT Contents Overview � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 3 2017 Highlights � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 3 Seattle Channel Productions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 5 seattlechannel.org � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 9 Seattle Channel Communications � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 9 Advertising/Marketing/Outreach � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 10 Seattle Channel Technology Upgrades � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �10 Seattle Channel Awards � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 11 Seattle Channel 2017 Accomplishments OVERVIEW In 2017, Seattle Channel laid the groundwork for a strategic planning process designed to establish a framework for the channel to navigate the myriad advances in technology, changes in TV viewership and the decline in cable subscribers. The confluence of these challenges presented an opportunity for the channel to evaluate its partnership, programming and marketing decisions and work toward developing a sustainable plan to ensure it effectively accomplishes its mission in a changing landscape. Seattle Channel received eight Northwest Regional Emmy-Award nominations and one Emmy Award. It was named among the “best municipal television stations in the nation” when it received the prestigious Excellence in Government Programming award from the National Association of Telecommunications Offices and Advisors (NATOA)� Staff engaged participants in the
    [Show full text]
  • Governing the Homeless in an Age of Compassion 3 2 3 These Feelings of Marginalization Were Deeply Felt by Tent City Residents
    anti_957 antixml-alsv1.cls (1994/07/13 v1.2u Standard LaTeX document class) 10-11-2011 :881 ANTI anti_957 Dispatch: 10-11-2011 CE: N/A 1 Journal MSP No. No. of pages: 21 PE: Kirsten 2 3 4 Governing the Homeless in an Age 5 of Compassion: Homelessness, 6 7 Citizenship, and the 10-Year Plan 8 9 to End Homelessness in King 10 County Washington 11 12 13 Tony Sparks 14 15 Department of Geography, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA, USA; 16 [email protected] 17 18 Abstract: In 2001, President Bush announced his intention to “end chronic homeless 19 by the year 2012” as part of his broad “Compassion Agenda”. Since then, departmental 20 consolidation, changes in funding allocation, and continued decentralization of services 21 provision have dramatically reshaped the landscape of homeless service provision in the US. In this paper I examine how these roll-out policies reify and re-entrench liberal equations of 22 property with rational self-governance at the local scale. Particularly, I illustrate how tropes 23 of homeless otherness work alongside and through federal neoliberal roll-out policies to 24 exclude homeless voices from the formation of local social policy. In doing so, I attempt to 25 call attention to the mutually constitutive relationship between the spatial management of homeless bodies, tropes of homeless deviance and dependence, and limits to citizenship 26 in the context of neoliberal urban governance. 27 28 Keywords: homelessness, social policy, citizenship, urban governance 29 30 31 32 Introduction 33 The consumer advisory counsel meeting of the Committee to End Homelessness in 34 King County (CEHKC) was proceeding as usual.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Report to the Community Seattle Office of Arts & Cultural Affairs Seattle Office of Table of Contents
    2008 REPORT TO THE COMMUNITY SEATTLE OFFICE OF ArTS & CULTURAL AFFAIrs Seattle Office of TABLE OF CONTENTS www.seattle.gov/arts THE OFFICE AT WORK 7 [email protected] Arts Education 11 O F F I C E M A I L I NG At City Hall 13 LoCATION ADDRESS 700 Fifth Avenue PO Box 94748 CULTURAL PARTNERSHIPS 15 Suite 1766 Seattle, WA Organization Partners 17 (206) 684-7171 98124-4748 Partner Artists 19 Youth Arts Partners 21 Neighborhood & Community Arts Partners 23 smART ventures Partners 25 2008 STAFF MAYOR’S ARTS AwARDS 27 DIRECtoR’S C I V I C OFFICE PARTNERSHIPS PUBLIC ART 29 Michael Killoren Melissa Hines Completed Projects 31 IMAGES Michael Irene Gómez Public Art Activities 35 Herschensohn Kathy Hsieh ( c o v e r ) Peggy Scales Marcia Iwasaki FINANCIALS 36 JASMINE ZIM- Paul Rucker MERMAN created Bottle House from OFFICE rec ycled bott les OPERATIONS CommUNITY fou nd at Seatt le Jane Morris DEVELopmENT C e n t e r f o r O n e Danielle Abbott & OUTREACH Reel’s Bumber- shoot®: Seattle’s Elly Beerman Lori Patrick Music & Arts Fes- Amy Herndon Nate Brown tival during Labor Sharaana Tamara Day weekend. Horton Childress Photo: Chris- Sheila Moss Jeffrey Pierce topher Nelson. Donna Wilson ( t h i s p a g e ) INTERNS LUCIA NEARE’S PUBLIC ART Garen Glazier Lullaby Moon i s Ruri Yampolsky Christopher a s e r i e s o f f r e e O’Neill performances that Vaughn Bell Angelique began in October Blake Haygood Sophie 2008 and will con- Tiffany Hedrick tinue on the new Patricia Hopper moon of each month T HANK YOU through September Jason Huff to DEPARTING 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle/King County- Count of Persons Experiencing Homelessness
    SEATTLE/KING COUNTY POINT-IN-TIME COUNT OF PERSONS EXPERIENCING HOMELESSNESS 2019 COMPREHENSIVE REPORT PRODUCED BY ASR ABOUT ALL HOME All Home is the lead agency for the Seattle/King County Continuum of Care. All Home’s vision is that homelessness should be rare in King County, racial disparities eliminated, and that homelessness should be a brief and one-time experience. Donna Andrews Felicia Salcedo Special Thanks To: Zachary DeWolf Triina Van Marci Curtin & Lianna Kressin, Human Services Dept. Latrice Donahue Mandy Urwiler Matt Simmonds & Edward Barber, Simtech Solutions Melissa Espinoza Danielle Winslow Nicole Novak and Laura Cindric, Slalom Thalia Garcia Jean-Paul Yafali LaMont Green Kira Zylstra 201 S Jackson Street, Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98104 www.allhomekc.org ABOUT THE RESEARCHER Applied Survey Research (ASR) is a social research firm dedicated to helping people build better communities by collecting meaningful data, facilitating information-based planning, and developing custom strategies. The firm was founded on the principle that community improvement, initiative sustainability, and program success are closely tied to assessment needs, evaluation of community goals, and development of appropriate responses. ASR has over 18 years of experience conducting Point-in-Time Counts throughout California and across the nation. Their methodology is featured as a best practice in the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) publication: A Guide to Counting Unsheltered Homeless People. Project Manager: James Connery Senior
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle/King County: Homeless System Performance Assessment and Recommendations with Particular Emphasis on Single Adults
    Seattle/King County: Homeless System Performance Assessment and Recommendations with Particular Emphasis on Single Adults Commissioned by United Way of King County, the City of Seattle, and King County Prepared by Focus Strategies September 2016 Seattle/King County: Homeless System Performance Assessment and Recommendations with Particular Emphasis on Single Adults Commissioned by United Way of King County, the City of Seattle, and King County Seattle/King County Client Group Mark Putnam, All Home Kira Zylstra, All Home Sola Plumacher, City of Seattle Josh Hall, City of Seattle Hedda McLendon, King County Mark Ellerbrook, King County Wayne Wilson, United Way of King County Vince Matulionis, United Way of King County Prepared by Focus Strategies Megan Kurteff Schatz, Principal Tracy Bennett, Director of Analytics and Evaluation Kate Bristol, Director of Consulting Genevieve Heidenreich, Senior Analyst Katharine Gale, Principal Associate Visit Focus Strategies’ website focusstrategies.net to find this and other reports, research, news, and more information about who we are and what we do. Focus Strategies offers services to help communities tackle homelessness at project and systems levels. Our services include data-driven planning and performance measurement, coordinated entry design, point in time counts, system and program evaluations, and supportive housing system development. Acknowledgements Acknowledgements We would like to thank Mark Putnam and Kira Zylstra from All Home, Sola Plumacher, Dusty Olson and Josh Hall from the City of Seattle, Mark Ellerbrook, and Hedda McLendon from King County, as well as Vince Matulionis and Wayne Wilson from United Way of King County for their time, dedication, and collaboration on this project. Thanks also to all the individuals who participated in the stakeholder interviews, for their willingness to share their knowledge and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the State of Washington Yes For
    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON YES FOR EARLY SUCCESS, a non-profit cotporation, LAURA CHANDLER,~dBARBARAFLYE Petitioners, vs. CITY OF SEATTLE ~d KING COUNTY, Respondents. PETITION FOR REVIEW SMITH & LOWNEY, PLLC By: Knoll D. Lowney WSBA No. 23457 Claire Tonry WSBA No. 44497 2317 East John Street Seattle WA 98112-5412 (206) 860-2883 Attorneys for Petitioners Barbara Flye ~d Laura Chandler TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................... ! II. IDENTITY OF PETITIONERS ........................................... .4 III. COURT OF APPEALS' PUBLISHED DECISION .............. .4 IV. ISSUES PRESENTED FOR REVIEW ................................... 5 V. STATEMENT OF THE CASE ............................................... 6 VI. ARGUMENT WHY REVIEW SHOULD BE GRANTED .... 9 1. This Court should accept review under RAP 13.4(b)(3) and (4) because the published opinion invalidates the initiative right in the City of Seattle and jeopardizes that right for 1.5 million residents of first-class cities ......................................... 9 a. First-class cities operating under charter are entitled to the same rights of direct democracy as other cities ..................................... .11 b. The recodification of a ballot title statute cannot justifY stripping voters of their rights and invalidating a City Charter................... 13 c. By invalidating the Charter's initiative process, but providing no replacement, the published opinion will lead to unending litigation .................. 16 2. Review is necessary under RAP 13.4(b)(3) to protect fundamental rights under the United States Constitution ............................................. 17 11 3. Review is necessary to protect the charters of first-class cities from unintentional preemption ..................................................... 19 4. Review is necessary to restore the right to bring an independent cause of action under the Open Public Meetings Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle Homelessness Services
    Project Feature Seattle Homelessness Services As part of Bloomberg Philanthropies’ What Works Cities initiative, the GPL provided pro bono technical assistance to help Seattle 1) consolidate its contracts with homeless services agencies and 2) re-orient these contracts to focus on performance. The Challenge: Despite an increase in spending on homeless services over the past five years, the number of people experiencing homelessness in Seattle has risen at an average rate of 13% per year between 2011 and 2016. Structural factors, including housing affordability, poverty, and inadequate mental health care, have contributed to this challenge, resulting in the Mayor’s declaration of a state of emergency on homelessness in 2015. Moreover, the City’s system of funding homeless services was not focused on achieving desired outcomes— specifically, permanent housing placements and retention. Historically, services have not been coordinated across providers, and for the last decade there has not been a competitive, strategic procurement for homeless services. Instead, the City relied on the renewal of legacy contracts and creation of new contracts to disburse additional funding. As a result, the City held roughly 200 contracts with 60 providers, with one provider having as many as 18 contracts for its different programs. Due to the high volume of contracts, contract managers on the City and provider side spent most of their time on administrative tasks, such as invoice and audit preparation. This left little time for monitoring performance to learn if spending was producing results, to flag operational challenges, and to develop and implement course corrections during the course of the contract.
    [Show full text]
  • King County Official Local Voters' Pamphlet
    August 2, 2016 Primary and Special Election King County Official Local Voters’ Pamphlet Your ballot will arrive by July 18 206-296-VOTE (8683) | kingcounty.gov/elections Reading the local From the voters’ pamphlet Director Why are there measures in the local voters’ pamphlet that are not on my ballot? Dear Friends. The measures on your ballot refl ect the districts in which you are registered to This is a big year for King County Elections. To vote. The local voters’ pamphlet may cover start, we are on track to hit 10 million ballots multiple districts and include measures counted without a single discrepancy this fall. outside of your districts. We expect to process over 1 million ballots this November alone. What is the order of candidates in the local voters’ pamphlet? I’m eager to continue our track record of transparency and accuracy – especially in light of Candidates in the local voters’ pamphlet this year’s Presidential Election – and I am also appear in the order they will appear on the excited about several projects that will mean ballot. transformative change for elections. For this Primary Election you will now have access to Are candidate statements fact checked 29 permanent ballot drop boxes that are open before they are published? 24-hours-a-day. November will see that number No. King County Elections is not responsible increase to 43 ballot drop boxes, meaning that for the content or accuracy of the 91.5% of King County residents will live within 3 statements, and we print them exactly as miles of a drop-off location.
    [Show full text]