Myanmar Nationals Abroad Arrive Home by Relief Flight

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Myanmar Nationals Abroad Arrive Home by Relief Flight PAGE-8 (OPINION) CRISIS DRILLS ARE EXPECTED IN POST-COVID-19 PANDEMIC NATIONAL The Global New Light of Myanmar 4 OCTOBER 2020 NEXT GENERATION PLATFORM THE GLOBAL NEW LIGHT OF MYANMAR Union Betterment Party, Federal Union Party and Shan State Kokant PAGE-10,11, 12 Showing compassion can help gain perspective or a new By Hein Htet Naing point of view because it puts Second Year Honours (English) us in someone else’s shoes East Yangon University and makes you put time and thought into au- alleviating someone’s suffering. WO months ago, I was walking around to- The simple act of listening with our full the park near my house when, by chance, mat- heart can be one of the most compassionate acts T I came across an old poor woman begging ically when you we can offer. However, compassionate listening for money from the passers-by. Without a second witness someone in makes us experience a great deal of burnout, which thought, I came up with the two confusing words pain. Let’s say, if you has been labeled as “empathy fatigue “ by some Democratic Party present their policies, stances and work programmes ,” Sympathy and Empathy” ,and also which one is saw someone slam a car door on researchers. When you have the ability to feel em- better than another? Both sympathy and empathy their fingers, you might feel pain in your pathy for the other person but then extend a hand have roots in the Greek term, páthos meaning “suf- fingers as well without hurting you. That feeling to alleviate someone’s pain, you are less likely to fering, feeling”. It is said that it’s very easy for us to means your mirror neurons have kicked in. burn out. It is the best solution to both who listen sympathize with someone poor, but it is hard for What’s more, “empathy” is stronger than sym- to and get it off the chest as a fifty-fifty profit. us to empathize with someone. No one can deny pathy. It is the ability to put yourself in the place of Research indicates that compassion and that It is totally true. another and understand someone else’s feelings empathy employ different regions of the brain and When I was young, I always saw someone by identifying with them. With empathy, you put that compassion can combat empathetic distress. Pull-outpoor begging for some money or something to eat yourselfsupplement in another’s shoes, often feeling things The 14th Dalai Lama famously said in the book The house to house. If my memory serves me right, I more deeply than if you just felt sympathy. Art of Happiness, “If you want others to be happy, didn’t give away anything although I said I felt ut- Of course, empathy matters more than an- practice compassion. If you want to be happy, terly sorry for them. As I didn’t contribute anything ything else because if we have empathy for other practice compassion.” to them but feeling sorry, it is called “Sympathy”. people’s situations, then we can live together with Summing up, in the real world, hardly ever do “Sympathy” is feeling compassion, sorrow, or pity them peacefully. Empathy always brings peace to we sympathize in action with someone. But after for the hardships that another person encounters. us by sharing our feelings and helping each other. thinking about these two confusing words for a lit- When I grow up, my attitude towards the word “ Empathy isn’t just for unpleasant feelings. You tle while, the things that come to my heart through Sympathy “ gradually changes into “Empathy “. can feel empathy when you see someone happy, my flesh are that if we usher in the empathetic To talk about “Empathy”, it is a little bit differ- too. Isn’t it great when someone walks in the room society with much our kindness to each other, our ent from “Sympathy “ even though both have the smiling, and that makes you smile? lives are absolutely worth living and we are always effects of kindness and humanity. Let’s look at how When it comes to “Compassion”, compas- proud of being humane ones. Finally, I become different the two concepts are. Instead of saying “ sion takes empathy and sympathy a step further. alert again and after that, I donate some money How poor!”, if our minds pass from sympathy to When you are compassionate, you feel the pain of and foods to this old poor woman .On that day, I action, let’s say_ giving away some money to such another (i.e., empathy) or you recognize that the felt thoroughly euphoric about such kind of con- someone poor, this is called “Empathy” because person is in pain (i.e., sympathy), and then you do tribution because it could make me determined to we behave sympathetically. When it comes to the your best to alleviate the person’s suffering from lead an empathetic life with sympathy, kindness term “Empathy”, most of us may understand like that situation. and compassion. that “Empathy “is putting ourselves in the shoes of At its Latin roots, compassion means “to suffer Be compassionate! another. So when someone gets their personal cas- with.” When we’re compassionate, we’re sharing Be empathetic! es off their chests, we’d better put ourselves in the our sympathetic and empathetic suffering upon Be sympathetic! shoes of theirs. Empathy is visceral feeling of what someone’s pain, depression and a feeling of deep Let’s lead a life of empathetic figure with another person feels. Thanks to what researchers hurt with someone else. When we are practicing sympathy. have deemed “mirror neurons,” empathy may arise compassion, we can stay present with suffering. Sunday, 4 October 2020 ww.gnlm.com.mm, www.globalnewlightofmyanmar.com w rd Waning of Tawthalin 1382 ME Vol. VII, No. 171, 3 Myanmar nationals abroad arrive home by relief flight HE relief flight of Myanmar National Airlines landed at the TYangon International Airport yesterday bringing back a total of 122 Myanmar citizens stranded in Aus- tralia, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea. The fifth relief flight of MNA took a total of 122 Myanmar citizens — 88 Myanmar citizens from Australia and New Zealand and 34 from Papua New Guinea — from Sydney, Australia. - Myanmar Embassy in Canber ra, Australia has organized the relief flights. The Ministry of Labour, Immi- gration and Population, the Ministry of Health and Sports and the Yangon Region government arranged 14-day quarantine at specific places or des- ignated hotels, followed by the 7-day home quarantine. The relief flights and chartered PHOTO: MNA flights have been bringing back the Myanmar citizens stranded in foreign Myanmar returnees from foreign countries arrive at the Yangon International Airport on 3 OctoberSydney, 2020. Australia. — MNA (Translated by TTN) countries in line with the instructions embassies from respective countries. from the National-Level Central Com- Affairs has been cooperating with This relief flight is the fifth time from mittee on Coronavirus Disease 2019 the relevant ministries and Myanmar (COVID-19). The Ministry of Foreign 978 more new cases of COVID-19 reported on 3 October, total figure rises to 16,503 MYANMAR’S COVID-19 positive cases rise to 16,503 after 978 new cases were reported on 3 October according to Ministry of Health and Sports. Among these 16,503 confirmed cases, 371 died, 4,795 have been discharged from hospitals.—MNA Death toll until 8 pm 3-10-2020 Updated at 8 pm, 3 October 2020 978 16,503 New Cases 18 Total Cases 4,795 Ministry of Health and Sports 371 Discharged from Hospital Total Death Tally 4 OCTOBER 2020 2 NATIONAL THE GLOBAL NEW LIGHT OF MYANMAR Union Minister U Kyaw Tin joins meeting on overseas voting UNION Minister for Internation- the Union Election Commission al Cooperation U Kyaw Tin and for the arrangement to send the heads of Myanmar Embassies, ballots on time by fixing the re- and Permanent Representatives quirements presented by the and Consulates-General Offices embassies despite the travel re- in foreign countries organized strictions in the COVID-19 crisis. second coordination meeting He also urged to take care over advance voting of Myanmar not to get infected the COVID-19 citizens living abroad for 2020 disease, to ensure all eligible vot- General Election via videocon- ers have the right to vote and to ference on 2 October 2020. work together for the free, fair Deputy Director-General of and successful election, to abide the Union Election Commission by COVID-19 restrictions and office U Ye Yint Lwin detailed rules of the respective country. about delivering of advance bal- The Union Minister and lot papers to the Myanmar Em- the Deputy Director-General of bassies in time amid COVID-19 the Union Election Commission restrictions to ensure voting replied to the discussions and rights of the citizens abroad and questions raised by heads of My- advance voting rules. anmar missions abroad. The Union Minister said Permanent Secretary U Soe that the ministry working on or- Union Minister U Kyaw Tin discusses with heads of Myanmar Embassies, and Permanent Representatives and Han from the Ministry of For- ganizing 2020 General Election Consulates-General Offices in foreign countries advance voting of Myanmar citizens living abroad for 2020 eign Affairs, Director-General in accordance with five norms General Election via videoconference on 2 October 2020. PHOTO: MNA of Planning and Administrative of free, fair, transparent, credi- Department U Aung Soe Win and ble and reflecting the will of the and Consulates-General Offic- voting rights in accordance with Ballot papers were already officials were also present at the people.
Recommended publications
  • Important Facts About the 2015 General Election Enlightened Myanmar Research Foundation - Emref
    Important Facts about the 2015 Myanmar General Election Enlightened Myanmar Research Foundation (EMReF) 2015 October Important Facts about the 2015 General Election Enlightened Myanmar Research Foundation - EMReF 1 Important Facts about the 2015 General Election Enlightened Myanmar Research Foundation - EMReF ENLIGHTENED MYANMAR RESEARCH ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT FOUNDATION (EMReF) This report is a product of the Information Enlightened Myanmar Research Foundation EMReF is an accredited non-profit research Strategies for Societies in Transition program. (EMReF has been carrying out political-oriented organization dedicated to socioeconomic and This program is supported by United States studies since 2012. In 2013, EMReF published the political studies in order to provide information Agency for International Development Fact Book of Political Parties in Myanmar (2010- and evidence-based recommendations for (USAID), Microsoft, the Bill & Melinda Gates 2012). Recently, EMReF studied The Record different stakeholders. EMReF has been Foundation, and the Tableau Foundation.The Keeping and Information Sharing System of extending its role in promoting evidence-based program is housed in the University of Pyithu Hluttaw (the People’s Parliament) and policy making, enhancing political awareness Washington's Henry M. Jackson School of shared the report to all stakeholders and the and participation for citizens and CSOs through International Studies and is run in collaboration public. Currently, EMReF has been regularly providing reliable and trustworthy information with the Technology & Social Change Group collecting some important data and information on political parties and elections, parliamentary (TASCHA) in the University of Washington’s on the elections and political parties. performances, and essential development Information School, and two partner policy issues.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNCIL COMMON POSITION 2003/297/CFSP of 28 April 2003 on Burma/Myanmar
    L 106/36EN Official Journal of the European Union 29.4.2003 (Acts adopted pursuant to Title V of the Treaty on European Union) COUNCIL COMMON POSITION 2003/297/CFSP of 28 April 2003 on Burma/Myanmar THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, will not be imposed if by that time there is substantive progress towards national reconciliation, the restoration of a democratic order and greater respect for human Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in parti- rights in Burma/Myanmar. cular Article 15 thereof, (6) Exemptions should be introduced in the arms embargo Whereas: in order to allow the export of certain military rated equipment for humanitarian use. (1) On 28 October 1996, the Council adopted Common Position 96/635/CFSP on Burma/Myanmar (1), which (7) The implementation of the visa ban should be without expires on 29 April 2003. prejudice to cases where a Member State is bound by an obligation of international law, or is host country of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (2) In view of the further deterioration in the political situa- (OSCE), or where the Minister and Vice-Minister for tion in Burma/Myanmar, as witnessed by the failure of Foreign Affairs for Burma/Myanmar visit with prior noti- the military authorities to enter into substantive discus- fication and agreement of the Council. sions with the democratic movement concerning a process leading to national reconciliation, respect for human rights and democracy and the continuing serious (8) The implementation of the ban on high level visits at the violations
    [Show full text]
  • Captain Aung Khin Myint [email protected] MIFFA BACKGROUND
    www.captaung.com Captain Aung Khin Myint [email protected] MIFFA BACKGROUND • Myanmar International Freight Forwarder’s Association • Non-Profit Organization • Formed and organized the local freight forwarders • MIFFA consists (161) Regular members and ( 91 ) Associate members. • Member of FIATA , AFFA, GMS FRETA, APSF, UMFCCI MIFFA Private Company Limited 2013 Looking Investment for Trucking, ICD, Warehouse and CFS for sea and air 1 Contents • MIFFA • Multimodal Law • Current status of Transport modes and Logistics • Myanmar Logistics performance index • Current FDI Projects • Why Dry port in Myanmar? • Recommendation for Myanmar’s Transport Logistics • Way forward -National Logistics Association -National Freight Policy 2 Timeline 1952-2006 MULTIMODAL •Myanmar Inland Waterway TRANSPORT LAW 1934-1952 Transport Act - 1952 rd •Myanmar Domestic Airway 3 Feb 2014 •The Myanmar Carriage by Transport Act - 1963 Air Act - 1934 •Land and Sea Transport •The Myanmar Aircraft Act - Businesses Act – 1963 1905-1925 1934 •Motor vehicle Law - 1964 •The Myanmar Lighthouse •Road and bridge usage law - • The Yangon Port Act - Act - 1937 1905 1985 •The Maritime Navigation •Highways Law - 2000 • The Defile Traffic Act - Treaties Act - 1952 1907 •Myanmar Maritime •Vessel Traffic Act - 1952 University Law - 2002 1841-1890 • The Ports Act - 1905 •Myanmar Inland Waterway •Maritime Resources and • The Out ports Act - Transport Act - 1952 River Maintenance Law - •The Myanmar 1914 2006 Registration of Ships Act - 1841 • The Inland Stream •The Bills of
    [Show full text]
  • Burma's Political Prisoners and U.S. Sanctions
    Burma’s Political Prisoners and U.S. Sanctions Michael F. Martin Specialist in Asian Affairs September 15, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R42363 c11173008 . Burma’s Political Prisoners and U.S. Sanctions Summary The release of all Burma’s political prisoners is one of the fundamental goals of U.S. policy. Several of the laws imposing sanctions on Burma—including the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003 (P.L. 108-61) and the Tom Lantos Block Burmese JADE (Junta’s Anti- Democratic Efforts) Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-286)—require the release of all political prisoners before the sanctions can be terminated. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2014 (P.L. 113- 76) requires the Department of State and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) to “support programs for former political prisoners” in Burma, as well as “monitor the number of political prisoners in Burma.” Burma’s President Thein Sein pledged during a July 2013 trip to the United Kingdom to release all “prisoners of conscience” in his country by the end of the year. Since his announcement, he granted amnesties or pardons on seven occasions. While President Thein Sein has asserted that all political prisoners have been freed, several Burmese organizations maintain that dozens of political prisoners remain in jail and that new political prisoners continue to be arrested and sentenced. Hopes for a democratic government and national reconciliation in Burma depend on the release of prisoners, including those associated with the country’s ethnic groups. Several ethnic-based political parties have stated they will not participate in parliamentary elections until their members are released.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Politics and the 2015 Elections in Myanmar
    MYANMAR POLICY BRIEFING | 16 | September 2015 Ethnic Politics and the 2015 Elections in Myanmar RECOMMENDATIONS • The 2015 general election presents an important opportunity to give political voice to Myanmar’s diverse ethnic nationality communities and empower them to pursue their aspirations, provided that it is genuinely free and fair. • If successfully held, the general election is likely to mark another key step in the process of national transition from decades of military rule. However the achievement of nationwide peace and further constitutional reform are still needed to guarantee the democratic rights, representation and participation of all peoples in determining the country’s future. • Although nationality parties are likely to win many seats in the polls, the impact of identity politics and vote-splitting along ethnic and party lines may see electoral success falling short of expectations. This can be addressed through political cooperation and reform. It is essential for peace and stability that the democratic process offers real hope to nationality communities that they can have greater control over their destiny. • Inequitable distribution of political and economic rights has long driven mistrust and conflict in Myanmar. The 2015 general election must mark a new era of political inclusion, not division, in national politics. After the elections, it is vital that an inclusive political dialogue moves forward at the national level to unite parliamentary processes and ethnic ceasefire talks as a political roadmap for all citizens. ideas into movement Introduction Myanmar/Burma1 is heading to the polls in November 2015, in what will be a closely watched election. Provided that they are free and fair, the polls are likely to have a major influence over the future political direction of the country, with an expected shift in power from the old elite to the opposition National League for Democracy (NLD).
    [Show full text]
  • Guide Reporting on Elections
    Reporting on Elections: A Toolkit for Journalists in Myanmar i Reporting on Elections: A Toolkit for Journalists in Myanmar ISBN: 978-616-8264-09-6 Written by: John Reiner M. Antiquerra Tharindu Abeyrathna Zayar Hlaing Layout cover designed by: Inspiral Creative Produced and Published By: The Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) 105 Sutthisan Winnichai Rd., Samsennok, Huai Khwang, Bangkok 10310, Thailand Tel: (+66 2) 26931867 Email: [email protected] Website: www.anfrel.org © 2020 by ANFREL Foundation The contents of this toolkit may be used for training and educational purposes only. Any reproduction of this publication must acknowledge that the copyright is held by ANFREL Foundation. The publication of this toolkit is made possible through the generous support of the Canadian Embassy in Yangon and the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs. ii Reporting on Elections: A Toolkit for Journalists in Myanmar Contents Foreword ..........................................................................................................................iv .....................................................vi 1. Introduction ...........................................................................................................1 Abbreviation and Myanmar Specific Terms 2. Elections ....................................................................................................................4 2.1. History of Elections in Myanmar ...........................................................4 2.2. Myanmar Electoral System .......................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • FIDH Report Half Empty: Burma's Political Parties and Their Human Rights Commitments
    Half Empty: Burma’s political parties and their human rights commitments November 2015 / N°668a November © AFP PHOTO / Soe Than Win MPs attend parliamentary session in Naypyidaw on July 4, 2012. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Foreword 4 2. Executive summary 4 3. Methodology 5 4. Outgoing Parliament disappoints on human rights 7 11 5.1 - Media freedom 12 5.2 - Religious discrimination 12 5.3 - Role of the military 13 5.4 - Accountability for past crimes 13 5.5 - Legislative reform 14 5.6 - Women’s rights 14 5.7 - Death penalty 14 5.8 - Ethnic minority rights 15 15 5.10 - Human rights defenders 15 5.11 - Investment, development, and infrastructure projects 16 5.12 - Next government’s top priorities 16 6. Recommendations to elected MPs 17 7. Appendixes 20 7.1 - Appendix 1: Survey’s complete results 20 7.2 - Appendix 2: Political parties contesting the 8 November election 25 1. FOREWORD By Tomás Ojea Quintana, former UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar to visit the new Parliament in Myanmar, I was able to economic course. 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Suu Kyi, is expected to win. 1 Burma Issues & Concerns Vol. 6: The generals’ election, January 2011 4 FIDH - HALF EMPTY: BURMA’S POLITICAL PARTIES AND THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITMENTS concerns. The report provides numerous recommendations to MPs, based on statements and reports issued by various UN special procedures as well as resolutions adopted by 3. METHODOLOGY [See Appendix 2: Political parties contesting the 8 November election Appendix 1: Survey’s complete results FIDH - HALF EMPTY: BURMA’S POLITICAL PARTIES AND THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITMENTS 5 6 FIDH - HALF EMPTY: BURMA’S POLITICAL PARTIES AND THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITMENTS 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 07 N Ganesan DOI.Indd
    Asian Journal of Peacebuilding Vol. 3 No. 2 (2015): 273-286 doi: 10.18588/201511.000046 Field Note Ethnic Insurgency and the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement in Myanmar N. Ganesan On October 15, 2015, the government of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar signed a Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement (NCA) with eight of the sixteen ethnic armed groups it had been negotiating with. The aim of the Thein Sein government had been to sign the agreement with all sixteen groups, but this was not realized. One reason why eight of the groups have been left out is the ongoing fighting between the Myanmar military and some of the groups, and the army’s unwillingness to involve them in the ceasefire process. Similarly, some of the ethnic armed groups have also indicated that they are unwilling, or not ready, to sign the NCA at this time. Keywords Myanmar politics, Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement, Myanmar Peace Center, ethnic insurgent groups, Myanmar military Introduction The Myanmar government concluded a Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement (NCA) on October 15 with eight of the country’s sixteen ethnic armed groups that it had engaged through the Nationwide Ceasefire Coordination Team (NCCT). This is one of the most important political steps taken since 2010 by the Thein Sein-led government. Other important developments include institutionalization of the ceasefire process through the inauguration of the Myanmar Peace Center. There are, however, a number of challenges facing the inclusion of all the ethnic armed groups in this process. The ongoing conflict with some of the groups, the army’s unwillingness to include certain groups, the shifting position of the ethnic groups and the large number of organizations claiming to collectively represent them, and the relative independence of some of the groups all constitute barriers to their full inclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Monitor No.22
    Euro-Burma Office 15 - 28 August 2015 Political Monitor 2015 POLITICAL MONITOR NO. 22 OFFICIAL MEDIA A MILESTONE IN THE MYANMAR PEACE PROCESS— THE NATIONWIDE CEASEFIRE AGREEMENT On 7 August 2015, the Union Government, Hluttaw, Tatmadaw, and Ethnic Armed Organizations (EAOs) achieved a milestone in the peace process by finalizing the text of the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement (NCA). President Thein Sein formally sent invitations to 15 Ethnic Armed Organizations (EAOs) on 18 August, 2015, to sign the NCA. Over the last 4 years, the Government held separate talks with each of the 15 EAOs and bilateral agreements were concluded. In total, 39 agreements at the state and union levels were signed. The Government accepted the request of the EAOs to organize meetings among themselves, and provided assistance for the holding of ethnic leaders summits. The Government also agreed to discuss proposals for the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement that resulted from these summits. The Union Peace-Making Work Committee (UPWC) composed of representatives from the Government, Hluttaw, and Tatmadaw, and the Ethnic Armed Organizations’ Nationwide Ceasefire Coordination Team (NCCT) met over a 17-month period to finalize a mutually acceptable Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement. Talks began in early November 2013, and on 31 March, 2015, the draft text of the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement, comprising 7 chapters and 33 paragraphs, was finalized. Although the government was ready to sign the Agreement, leaders of Ethnic Armed Organizations formed the Senior Delegation (SD) and requested amendments to the text of the Agreement. In the interest of achieving nationwide peace, the Government resumed negotiations, and on 7 August, 2015, all provisions of the Agreement were finalized.1 UEC ANNOUNCES PRELIMINARY CANDIDATE LISTS The country’s 2 main political parties — the ruling Union Solidarity and Development Party and the opposition National League for Democracy — will each field more than 1,000 candidates in the 8 November general election.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Politics and the 2015 Elections in Myanmar
    MYANMAR POLICY BRIEFING | 16 | September 2015 Ethnic Politics and the 2015 Elections in Myanmar KEY POINTS • The 2015 general election presents an important opportunity to give political voice to Myanmar’s diverse ethnic nationality communities and empower them to pursue their aspirations, provided that it is genuinely free and fair. • If successfully held, the general election is likely to mark another key step in the process of national transition from decades of military rule. However the achievement of nationwide peace and further constitutional reform are still needed to guarantee the democratic rights, representation and participation of all peoples in determining the country’s future. • Although nationality parties are likely to win many seats in the polls, the impact of identity politics and vote-splitting along ethnic and party lines may see electoral success falling short of expectations. This can be addressed through political cooperation and reform. It is essential for peace and stability that the democratic process offers real hope to nationality communities that they can have greater control over their destiny. • Inequitable distribution of political and economic rights has long driven mistrust and conflict in Myanmar. The 2015 general election must mark a new era of political inclusion, not division, in national politics. After the elections, it is vital that an inclusive political dialogue moves forward at the national level to unite parliamentary processes and ethnic ceasefire talks as a political roadmap for all citizens. ideas into movement Introduction Myanmar/Burma1 is heading to the polls in November 2015, in what will be a closely watched election. Provided that they are free and fair, the polls are likely to have a major influence over the future political direction of the country, with an expected shift in power from the old elite to the opposition National League for Democracy (NLD).
    [Show full text]
  • Headquarters of Ethnic Political Parties
    Headquarters of Ethnic Political Parties Ethnic Political Parties 1 Akha National Development Party 2 All Mon Regions Democracy Party KACHIN 3 Arakan League for Democracy Party STATE 4 Arakan National Party INDIA 5 Arakan Patriot Party 41 43 44 6 Asho Chin National Party 29 20 19 7 Chin League for Democracy Myitkyina !! 29 8 Chin National Democratic Party Waingmaw 9 Chin Progressive Party CHINA 10 Daingnet National Development Party 11 Danu National Democracy Party SAGAING 12 Danu National Organization Party REGION 13 Dawei Nationalities Party 14 Eastern Shan State Development Democratic Party 46 ! Hopang 39 15 Ethnic National Development Party Namhsan ! ! 16 Federal Union Party CHIN MANDALAY Lashio STATE REGION 26 27 45 17 Inn National Development Party 40 38 18 Ka Man National Development Party Mandalay SHAN 19 Kachin Democratic Party 15 ! STATE ! 20 Kachin State Democracy Party Paletwa 25 Matupi 12 11 ! ! 21 Karen National Democratic Party Ywarngan 14 32 10 ! 34 36 Kengtung 22 Kayah State Democratic Party ! !Buthidaung 17 Kyaukttaw ! Taunggyi 23 Kayan National Party 31 Nyaung Shwe! 1 ! ! 24 Kha Me National Development Party 33 24 5 4 Mrauk-U MAGWAY Tachilek Sittwe ! REGION 23 25 Khumi (Khami) National Party Pekon ! 22 26 Kokang Democracy and Unity Party \ !Loikaw RAKHINE Nay Pyi Taw 27 Lahu National Development Party STATE 28 Lhaovo National Unity and Development Party KAYAH STATE 29 Lisu National Democracy Party BAGO 30 Mon National Party REGION THAILAND 31 Mro National Democracy Party KAYIH 32 Mro National Development Party STATE
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethnic Political Parties of Myanmar (2018 Update)
    The Ethnic Political Parties of Myanmar (2018 update) States/ States/ States/ Total No. of elected No. of candidates fielded by parties No. of candidates fielded by parties 2017 No. of candidates fielded by parties 2018 Union Union Union UPDJC Regions Regions Regions candidates in both 2015 General Elections By-Elections By-Elections No. Parties Parliament Parliament Parliament UPDJC Working NBF UNA Parliaments Parliaments Parliaments parliaments by parties 2015 2017 2018 Committees 2015 2017 2018 2015+2017+2018 Total LH UP S/R Ethnic Total LH UP S/R Ethnic Total LH UP S/R Ethnic 1 Akha National Development Party 1 1 1 7 1 5 1 1 1 0 2 All Mon Regions Democracy Party 1 1 1 1 x 35 7 10 17 1 1 1 0 3 Arakan League for Democracy Party 0 x 0 0 3 1 2 4 Arakan National Party 22 23 1 46 1 1 x 79 21 15 41 2 0 1 1 5 Arakan Patriot Party 0 x 16 5 3 8 0 0 6 Asho Chin National Party 0 x 10 2 6 2 0 0 7 Chin League for Democracy 1 1 x 27 7 5 14 1 0 2 2 8 Chin National Democratic Party 0 x 58 13 13 29 3 1 1 1 1 9 Chin Progressive Party 0 x 23 4 5 13 1 0 1 1 10 Daingnet National Development Party 0 3 1 2 0 0 11 Danu National Democracy Party 0 x 19 5 3 11 0 0 12 Danu National Organization Party 0 x 7 2 1 4 0 0 13 Dawei Nationalities Party 0 x 13 3 3 7 0 0 14 Eastern Shan State Development Democratic Party 0 7 2 1 4 0 0 15 Ethnic National Development Party 0 x 7 1 2 4 0 0 16 Federal Union Party 0 x 37 12 3 22 0 0 17 Inn National Development Party 0 x 6 1 1 3 1 0 0 18 Inn Nationalities League Party 0 x 5 1 3 1 0 0 19 Ka Man National Development Party 0 4
    [Show full text]