Louisiana Hospital Responses to Hurricanes Katrina and Gustav

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Louisiana Hospital Responses to Hurricanes Katrina and Gustav The National Emergency Management Summit Louisiana Hospital Responses to Hurricanes Katrina and Gustav Knox Andress, BA, AD, RN, FAEN Designated Regional Coordinator Louisiana Region 7 Hospital Preparedness LSU Health Sciences Center ‐ Shreveport 1 Goal ‐ Objectives • Goal – – Demonstrate comparisons of impacts and responses to Hurricanes Katrina and Gustav by Louisiana hospitals • Objectives – – Provide a background on storm dynamics and history – Discuss factors influencing hospital evacuation – Discuss numbers of partial and total hospital evacuations – Discuss impacts to hospitals in a sheltering region 2 3 Katrina Dynamics • Hurricane Katrina – – Entered Gulf of Mexico – August 26, 20051 – Predictions: “Category 1” projected to become a “Category 5” – Hurricane warnings: Louisiana central coastline to Florida panhandle – Landfall: August 29, 2005; Burras, LA (Southeast Louisiana); “Category 3” w/ 125 mph winds – Storm surges: 10’ – 19’. – Levee breaches: = 53; 80% New Orleans & neighboring parishes flooded. – Louisiana fatalities: 1,464 storm‐related; 135 missing2 – Estimated 100 billion dollars in LA property damage/loss3 4 Katrina: Predictions and History 5 Canal Breeches London Avenue Canal Industrial Canal 6 Hurricane Katrina –New Orleans 7 Gustav: Predictions and History 8 Gustav Dynamics • Hurricane Gustav – – Entered: Gulf of Mexico –August 31, 20084 – Predictions: “Category 1” projected to become a “Category 5” – Hurricane warnings: Cameron Parish to Ala/Fla border – Landfall: September 1, 2008; Cocodrie, LA –(Centra l coastal Louisiana); “Category 2” w/ 105 mph winds – Louisiana storm surges: 10 –14 feet. – Levee “topping” ‐ No (0) levee breaks – Louisiana Fatalities: 48 storm‐related5 – Estimated 4.3 billion in LA property damage/loss 9 Disaster Declarations in Louisiana • Katrina Declarations • Gustav Declarations 10 Hurricane Impacts to hospitals • Katrina • Gustav – Wind – Wind – Catastrophic flooding – Minimal flooding 11 Gustav: Hospital Power Outages6 Hospital Hospitals Region (G) Region 1 1 Region 2 12 Region 3 5 Region 4 9 Region 5 0 Region 6 2 Region 7 0 Region 8 0 Region 9 1 TOTAL 30 12 Gustav: Hospital Evacuation Breakdowns6 Hospital Partial Complete Pre- Post- Pre + Region Evacs Evacs landfall landfall Post Evacs 1 8 8 16 0 16 2 1 4 0 5 5 3 3 7 10 0 10 4 6 12 9 3 12 5 5 7 12 0 12 6 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 9 5 7 10 2 12 TOTAL 28 45 57 10 67 13 Louisiana Hospital Evacuations – Katrina vs Gustav6 Hurricane Pre Post Total Hurricane Pre Post Total Katrina Storm Storm Gustav* Storm Storm Total 8 26 34 Total 38 7 45 Hospital Hospital Evacuation Evacuation Partial 5 5 Partial 25 3 28 Hospital Hospital Evacuation Evacuation Total 13 26 39 Total 63 10 73 *Gustav ‐ approximately 1000 patients evacuated pre‐storm; 223 patients were evacuated post‐storm. 14 HospitalHospital EvacuationEvacuation TimesTimes HurricaneHurricane RitaRita –– SeptemberSeptember 20052005 Hours for Evaucation 35 32 30 29 30 28 25 20 16 15 9 10 6 5 - Hospital D Hospital G Hospital E Hospital F Hospital A Hospital B Hospital C Benchmarking Hospitals for Hurricane Evacuations; Downey, E; Andress, K; Schulz, C; Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 2007, V 22, No 3, 15 Impacting Hospitals – Gustav: Nursing Home Power Outages 6 Region Nursing Homes (G) Region 1 0 Region 2 12 Region 3 2 Region 4 0 Region 5 0 Region 6 0 Region 7 0 Region 8 0 Region 9 1 TOTAL 15 16 Impacting Hospitals ‐ Gustav: Nursing Home Evacuations6 Hurricane Gustav Pre Storm Post Storm Total Complete 94 2 96 Evacuation Partial Evacuation 0 0 0 Total 94 2 96 8,401 residents evacuated pre‐storm; 160 residents evacuated post‐storm 17 StateState RegionalRegional InfrastructureInfrastructure ¾ 99 ‐‐LouisianaLouisiana DHHDHH HospitalHospital PreparednessPreparedness RegionsRegions ¾ RegionRegion ‐‐ DesignatedDesignated RegionalRegional CoordinatorsCoordinators‐‐ Hospitals/EMS/ Nursing Homes/Coroners /… Medical Institution Evacuation Plan War‐Game Numbers of potential throughput6 Number of Parishes: 12 Number of Hospitals: 60+ Regions 4,5: 624 patients Regions 3,4: 343 patients Regions 1,3,9: 1063 patients Anticipated Planning Range: low - high 343 - 1063 (reasonable “worst case” planning scenarios) 19 Louisiana: Transportation Evacuation Requirements for Hospitals6 Hospital Census Details NDMS Totals Vehicle Requirements Patients Post‐ Patients needing Para‐ Regions Discharge ICU Census Needing NDMS Critical Care Ambulances Transit Buses Census Evacuation Transport Seats Teams 1,3,9 798 59 268 18 91 264 14 3,4 316 27 168 10 42 112 1 4,5 601 40 207 8 68 207 5 20 Census is for all hospitals that are SIP 2 or 3, and not EVAC Tier 1 GUSTAV Medical Institution Evacuation: August 31, 20086 • State/ hospitals waited for almost two days before C‐130s and AE crews showed up at Region 5 AMP and Region 1 AMP. Region 5 AMP Chennault Airport 124 NDMS patients Regions 4 Acadiana Airport 34 Homebound patients Regions 1 AMP Regions 3 Lakefront Airport Moved by ground/air 302 NDMS patients ambulances the NDMS patients 81 Homebound patients and homebound patients to Region 1 21 Repatriation of NDMS patients and Medical Special Needs evacuees Total Patients Number of Total Number Total Patients Total Patients Left to be Patients Received Deceased in CareFlite Que State Received Alabama 9 9 0 0 0 Arkansas 325 304 21 0 0 Kentucky 3 3 0 0 0 Mississippi 98 98 0 0 0 North Carolina 1 1 0 0 0 Oklahoma 30 29 1 0 0 Tennessee 8 8 0 0 0 Texas 86 84 2 0 0 Total 560 536 24 0 0 Source: DHH Repatriation Call, October 2, 2008 (Kathy Kliebert) 22 Planning and Responses: Pre Hurricane Katrina • 2002 • 2004 1. Tropical Storm “Isidore” 1. Hurricane “Pam” TTX 2. Hurricane “Lili” planning • 2003 1. Hurricane “Ivan” 1. DHH Hurricane Annex “X” 2. DHH –Hospital –Sheltering • 2005 MOU 1. Hurricane “Pam” TTX 3. Hospital CEO Hurricane 2. Hurricane Katrina and Rita Checklist AARs 1. Tropical Storm “Bill” 1. Hurricane “Dennis” 2. Hurricane “Cindy” 3. Hurricane “Katrina” 4. Hurricane “Rita” 23 Planning and Responses: Post Hurricane Katrina7 • 2006 • 2007 1. Medical Institution Evacuation 1. Region 1 and 9 MIEP Exercise Plan (MIEP) 2. Region 3 MIEP Exercise 2. EMSystem’s – EMResource 3. Region 5 MIEP Exercise 3. Patient Tracking Plan 4. State ‐wide Hurricane Exercise 4. “H ‐Hour Calculator” 5. Louisiana/Federal Joint 5. Louisiana Hospital Emergency Response Plan Update Preparedness Network 6. Neonatal Evacuation Form 6. Louisiana/Federal Joint 7. Psychiatric Patient Movement Response Plan Form 7. EMS DRCs 8. Private Patient Movement Form 8. Nursing Home DRCs 9. Shelter‐in‐Place 9. Katrina and Rita AARs Recommendations 1. Tropical Storm “Alberto” 1. Hurricane “Dean” 2. Hurricane “Ernesto” 2. Tropical Storm “Humberto” 3. Tropical Depression #10 24 Planning and Response: Post Hurricane Katrina7 • 2008 1. Regions 1, 3, and 9 MIEP Exercise 2. Region 4 MIEP Exercise 3. State‐wide Hurricane Exercise 4. Hospital Aeromedical Transfer Form 5. Neonatal Transfer form 6. Patient Locator 7. Credentialing Procedures for LPNs, RNs, and MDs 8. Hurricane “Gustav” and “Ike” AARs 1. Tropical Storm “Eduard” 2. Hurricane “Gustav” 3. Hurricane “Ike” 25 Primary and Secondary Hurricane Hospital Impacts 1. Primary system impacts come from evacuating hospital processes. 2. Secondary system impacts originate from supporting: – evacuating hospitals and – sheltering evacuee population 26 Sheltering Impact to Hospitals ‐ Indicators • Numbers of shelters • Types of shelters (Special Medical Needs; Critical Transportation Needs; General, etc.) • Length of operation • EMS shelter runs to hospitals • Types of medical complaints • “Diversion” time by local hospitals • Shelter medical resourcing 27 Louisiana’s –Region 7 Shreveport & Claiborne Bossier City Bossier Webster Caddo Bienville De Soto Red River Natchitoches Sabine 28 Louisiana Region 7: Demographics General Demographics: ¾ Region Population: 524,000 (Census 2000) ¾ Largest city ‐ Shreveport: 200,145 (Census 2000) ¾ Planning for surging 264 (500/100,000,000) ¾ Parishes: 9 in Northwest Louisiana ¾ Number of hospitals: 28 (17 “Tier 1” and “11 Tier 2”) (Tier 1 = hospitals with emergency departments; Tier 2 = all other hospitals) 29 RegionRegion 77 HospitalsHospitals inin 99 ParishesParishes Claiborne Bossier •CHRISTUS Schumpert Highland (T1) CLAIRBORNE PARISH Webster Caddo •Doctors’ Hospital of Shreveport (T2) •Homer Memorial Hospital Bienville (T1) •Dubuis Hospital of Shreveport (T2) Red DESOTO PARISH De Soto River •Promise Hospital of Shreveport (T2) •DeSoto Regional MC (T1) •LifeCare Hospital (T2) NATCHITOCHES PARISH Sabine •LSU-Health Sciences Center (T1) Natchitoches •Natchitoches Regional Med •North Caddo Medical Center (T1) Center (T1) BIENVILLE PARISH •Overton Brooks VA Medical Center (T1) •Natchitoches Parish Extended Extended Care (T2) •Bienville Medical Center (T2) •Specialists Hospital of Shreveport (T2) RED RIVER PARISH BOSSIER PARISH •Shriners Hospitals for Children- Shreveport (T2) •CHRISTUS Coushatta (T1) •Bossier Specialty Hospital (T2) •Willis-Knighton Medical Center (T1) SABINE PARISH •Cornerstone Hospital (T2) •Willis Knighton Pierremont Health •Sabine Medical Center (T1) •Willis-Knighton Bossier (T1) Center (T1) WEBSTER PARISH CADDO PARISH •Willis-Knighton Health System South •Minden Medical Center (T1) •Brentwood, A Behavior Health (T1) Company (T2) •Springhill Medical Center (T1) •CHRISTUS Schumpert St Mary T1 = hospitals w EDs; Place (T1) 30 T2 = all other hospitals Shelters in: Region 7’s Shreveport and Bossier City Katrina Shelters Gustav Shelters • General Shelters •
Recommended publications
  • GAO-08-1120 Disaster Recovery: Past Experiences Offer Insights For
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Committee on Homeland GAO Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate September 2008 DISASTER RECOVERY Past Experiences Offer Insights for Recovering from Hurricanes Ike and Gustav and Other Recent Natural Disasters GAO-08-1120 September 2008 DISASTER RECOVERY Accountability Integrity Reliability Past Experiences Offer Insights for Recovering from Highlights Hurricanes Ike and Gustav and Other Recent Natural Highlights of GAO-08-1120, a report to the Disasters Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found This month, Hurricanes Ike and While the federal government provides significant financial assistance after Gustav struck the Gulf Coast major disasters, state and local governments play the lead role in disaster producing widespread damage and recovery. As affected jurisdictions recover from the recent hurricanes and leading to federal major disaster floods, experiences from past disasters can provide insights into potential declarations. Earlier this year, good practices. Drawing on experiences from six major disasters that heavy flooding resulted in similar declarations in seven Midwest occurred from 1989 to 2005, GAO identified the following selected insights: states. In response, federal agencies have provided millions of • Create a clear, implementable, and timely recovery plan. Effective dollars in assistance to help with recovery plans provide a road map for recovery. For example, within short- and long-term recovery. 6 months of the 1995 earthquake in Japan, the city of Kobe created a State and local governments bear recovery plan that identified detailed goals which facilitated coordination the primary responsibility for among recovery stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Ernesto (2006): Frontal Influence on Precipitation Distribution
    Hurricane Ernesto (2006): Frontal Influence on Precipitation Distribution Jordan Dale and Gary Lackmann North Carolina State University Barrett Smith NOAA/National Weather Service Raleigh, North Carolina Motivation Observational Analysis Simulated Frontal Analysis • The distribution of precipitation associated with landfalling tropical 0600 UTC 1 September 0600 UTC 1 September cyclones remains a critical forecast problem and is dependent on several factors, including: . storm motion . intensity . areal extent . synoptic-scale forcing Surface observations RUC Theta and 2-D Frontogenesis 0.5° Reflectivity Theta and 2-D Frontogenesis 850mb Temperature Advection Simulated Total Reflectivity . topographical characteristics • A warm front is noted by a theta gradient strong frontogenesis along the • The locations of frontogenesis and theta gradients with respect to the TC . mesoscale boundaries center are similar to observations but displaced westward. Enhanced coast east of the TC center. A region of enhanced reflectivity is north of • Of these factors, mesoscale boundaries are a prominent forecasting the warm front near the TC center. reflectivities are present to the north of the frontal boundary in locations challenge due to the small spatial scales and complex origins. where 850mb warm advection is occurring. 1800 UTC 1 September • The purpose of this study is to isolate the physical processes at play 1800 UTC 1 September during the interaction of tropical cyclones (TC) and boundaries, and then investigate the predictability and impact
    [Show full text]
  • Aerial Rapid Assessment of Hurricane Damages to Northern Gulf Coastal Habitats
    8786 ReportScience Title and the Storms: the USGS Response to the Hurricanes of 2005 Chapter Five: Landscape5 Changes The hurricanes of 2005 greatly changed the landscape of the Gulf Coast. The following articles document the initial damage assessment from coastal Alabama to Texas; the change of 217 mi2 of coastal Louisiana to water after Katrina and Rita; estuarine damage to barrier islands of the central Gulf Coast, especially Dauphin Island, Ala., and the Chandeleur Islands, La.; erosion of beaches of western Louisiana after Rita; and the damages and loss of floodplain forest of the Pearl River Basin. Aerial Rapid Assessment of Hurricane Damages to Northern Gulf Coastal Habitats By Thomas C. Michot, Christopher J. Wells, and Paul C. Chadwick Hurricane Katrina made landfall in southeast Louisiana on August 29, 2005, and Hurricane Rita made landfall in southwest Louisiana on September 24, 2005. Scientists from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) flew aerial surveys to assess damages to natural resources and to lands owned and managed by the U.S. Department of the Interior and other agencies. Flights were made on eight dates from August Introduction 27 through October 4, including one pre-Katrina, three post-Katrina, The USGS National Wetlands and four post-Rita surveys. The Research Center (NWRC) has a geographic area surveyed history of conducting aerial rapid- extended from Galveston, response surveys to assess Tex., to Gulf Shores, hurricane damages along the Ala., and from the Gulf coastal areas of the Gulf of of Mexico shoreline Mexico and Caribbean inland 5–75 mi Sea. Posthurricane (8–121 km).
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons Learned: Evacuations Management of Hurricane Gustav
    4th Symposium on Policy and Socio-Economic Research, American Meteorological Society, Phoenix, AZ, 2009. 2.5 LESSONS LEARNED: EVACUATIONS MANAGEMENT OF HURRICANE GUSTAV Gina M. Eosco1, Mark A. Shafer2, and Barry Keim3 1Department of Communications, University of Oklahoma 2Oklahoma Climatological Survey, University of Oklahoma 3 Department of Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State University Experience is what you get when you don’t get what you want. The experience of Hurricane Katrina was not what anyone in New Orleans wanted, yet three years after New Orleans was struck by Hurricane Katrina, the city proved they were ready for the next big one. As the National Hurricane Center forecasts started indicating a possible category 3 or stronger hurricane heading towards Louisiana, the city began preparations for evacuation. Gulf coast residents responded with the largest evacuation in U.S. history. Given the contrast with Katrina, why was the response to Gustav so much better? It is true that government officials learned from Katrina, but Katrina was just one milestone along the way toward making New Orleans safer. This paper examines prior recent experience with hurricanes in Louisiana, events surrounding Hurricane Gustav, and Figure 1. Track of Hurricane Georges, September how we have learned from other disasters. Not only 20-27, 1998 (Image source: Unisys did Louisiana officials learn from prior hurricanes, http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/). but those far-removed from the area of impact learned from their own disaster experiences to hurricane Georges was uncoordinated and chaotic. manage the influx of evacuees. The progression of Each parish had its own separate response plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond, VA Hurricanes
    Hurricanes Influencing the Richmond Area Why should residents of the Middle Atlantic states be concerned about hurricanes during the coming hurricane season, which officially begins on June 1 and ends November 30? After all, the big ones don't seem to affect the region anymore. Consider the following: The last Category 2 hurricane to make landfall along the U.S. East Coast, north of Florida, was Isabel in 2003. The last Category 3 was Fran in 1996, and the last Category 4 was Hugo in 1989. Meanwhile, ten Category 2 or stronger storms have made landfall along the Gulf Coast between 2004 and 2008. Hurricane history suggests that the Mid-Atlantic's seeming immunity will change as soon as 2009. Hurricane Alley shifts. Past active hurricane cycles, typically lasting 25 to 30 years, have brought many destructive storms to the region, particularly to shore areas. Never before have so many people and so much property been at risk. Extensive coastal development and a rising sea make for increased vulnerability. A storm like the Great Atlantic Hurricane of 1944, a powerful Category 3, would savage shorelines from North Carolina to New England. History suggests that such an event is due. Hurricane Hazel in 1954 came ashore in North Carolina as a Category 4 to directly slam the Mid-Atlantic region. It swirled hurricane-force winds along an interior track of 700 miles, through the Northeast and into Canada. More than 100 people died. Hazel-type wind events occur about every 50 years. Areas north of Florida are particularly susceptible to wind damage.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Disaster Assistance After Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Wilma, Gustav, and Ike
    Federal Disaster Assistance After Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Wilma, Gustav, and Ike Updated February 26, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R43139 Federal Disaster Assistance After Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Wilma, Gustav, and Ike Summary This report provides information on federal financial assistance provided to the Gulf States after major disasters were declared in Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas in response to the widespread destruction that resulted from Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, and Wilma in 2005 and Hurricanes Gustav and Ike in 2008. Though the storms happened over a decade ago, Congress has remained interested in the types and amounts of federal assistance that were provided to the Gulf Coast for several reasons. This includes how the money has been spent, what resources have been provided to the region, and whether the money has reached the intended people and entities. The financial information is also useful for congressional oversight of the federal programs provided in response to the storms. It gives Congress a general idea of the federal assets that are needed and can be brought to bear when catastrophic disasters take place in the United States. Finally, the financial information from the storms can help frame the congressional debate concerning federal assistance for current and future disasters. The financial information for the 2005 and 2008 Gulf Coast storms is provided in two sections of this report: 1. Table 1 of Section I summarizes disaster assistance supplemental appropriations enacted into public law primarily for the needs associated with the five hurricanes, with the information categorized by federal department and agency; and 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane & Tropical Storm
    5.8 HURRICANE & TROPICAL STORM SECTION 5.8 HURRICANE AND TROPICAL STORM 5.8.1 HAZARD DESCRIPTION A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (NOAA, 2013). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development. The average wind speeds for tropical storms and hurricanes are listed below: . A tropical depression has a maximum sustained wind speeds of 38 miles per hour (mph) or less . A tropical storm has maximum sustained wind speeds of 39 to 73 mph . A hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 74 mph or higher. In the western North Pacific, hurricanes are called typhoons; similar storms in the Indian Ocean and South Pacific Ocean are called cyclones. A major hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 111 mph or higher (NOAA, 2013). Over a two-year period, the United States coastline is struck by an average of three hurricanes, one of which is classified as a major hurricane. Hurricanes, tropical storms, and tropical depressions may pose a threat to life and property. These storms bring heavy rain, storm surge and flooding (NOAA, 2013). The cooler waters off the coast of New Jersey can serve to diminish the energy of storms that have traveled up the eastern seaboard.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL SUMMARY Atlantic Hurricane Season of 2005
    MARCH 2008 ANNUAL SUMMARY 1109 ANNUAL SUMMARY Atlantic Hurricane Season of 2005 JOHN L. BEVEN II, LIXION A. AVILA,ERIC S. BLAKE,DANIEL P. BROWN,JAMES L. FRANKLIN, RICHARD D. KNABB,RICHARD J. PASCH,JAMIE R. RHOME, AND STACY R. STEWART Tropical Prediction Center, NOAA/NWS/National Hurricane Center, Miami, Florida (Manuscript received 2 November 2006, in final form 30 April 2007) ABSTRACT The 2005 Atlantic hurricane season was the most active of record. Twenty-eight storms occurred, includ- ing 27 tropical storms and one subtropical storm. Fifteen of the storms became hurricanes, and seven of these became major hurricanes. Additionally, there were two tropical depressions and one subtropical depression. Numerous records for single-season activity were set, including most storms, most hurricanes, and highest accumulated cyclone energy index. Five hurricanes and two tropical storms made landfall in the United States, including four major hurricanes. Eight other cyclones made landfall elsewhere in the basin, and five systems that did not make landfall nonetheless impacted land areas. The 2005 storms directly caused nearly 1700 deaths. This includes approximately 1500 in the United States from Hurricane Katrina— the deadliest U.S. hurricane since 1928. The storms also caused well over $100 billion in damages in the United States alone, making 2005 the costliest hurricane season of record. 1. Introduction intervals for all tropical and subtropical cyclones with intensities of 34 kt or greater; Bell et al. 2000), the 2005 By almost all standards of measure, the 2005 Atlantic season had a record value of about 256% of the long- hurricane season was the most active of record.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribbean:Tropical Storm Ernesto
    CARIBBEAN:TROPICAL Information Bulletin no. 2/2006 STORM ERNESTO 27 August 2006 The Federation’s mission is to improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilizing the power of humanity. It is the world’s largest humanitarian organization and its millions of volunteers are active in over 183 countries. In Brief This Bulletin is being issued for information only, and reflects the situation and the information available at this time. The Federation is not seeking funding or other assistance from donors for this operation at this time. The International Federation undertakes activities that are aligned with its Global Agenda, which sets out four broad goals to achieve the Federation's mission to "improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilizing the power of humanity". Global Agenda Goals: · Reduce the numbers of deaths, injuries and impact from disasters. · Reduce the number of deaths, illnesses and impact from diseases and public health emergencies. · Increase local community, civil society and Red Cross Red Crescent capacity to address the most urgent situations of vulnerability. · Reduce intolerance, discrimination and social exclusion and promote respect for diversity and human dignity. For further information specifically related to this operation please contact: · In Cuba: Dr Foyo Ceballos, Secretary General, Cuban Red Cross, [email protected] · In Haiti: Dr. Michaele Amedée Gédéon, President, Haitian National Red Cross Society e-mail: [email protected] phone (509) 222 55 54; Dr. Jean-Pierre Guiteau, Executive Officer, Haitian
    [Show full text]
  • A Classification Scheme for Landfalling Tropical Cyclones
    A CLASSIFICATION SCHEME FOR LANDFALLING TROPICAL CYCLONES BASED ON PRECIPITATION VARIABLES DERIVED FROM GIS AND GROUND RADAR ANALYSIS by IAN J. COMSTOCK JASON C. SENKBEIL, COMMITTEE CHAIR DAVID M. BROMMER JOE WEBER P. GRADY DIXON A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in the Department of Geography in the graduate school of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2011 Copyright Ian J. Comstock 2011 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT Landfalling tropical cyclones present a multitude of hazards that threaten life and property to coastal and inland communities. These hazards are most commonly categorized by the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Potential Disaster Scale. Currently, there is not a system or scale that categorizes tropical cyclones by precipitation and flooding, which is the primary cause of fatalities and property damage from landfalling tropical cyclones. This research compiles ground based radar data (Nexrad Level-III) in the U.S. and analyzes tropical cyclone precipitation data in a GIS platform. Twenty-six landfalling tropical cyclones from 1995 to 2008 are included in this research where they were classified using Cluster Analysis. Precipitation and storm variables used in classification include: rain shield area, convective precipitation area, rain shield decay, and storm forward speed. Results indicate six distinct groups of tropical cyclones based on these variables. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the faculty members I have been working with over the last year and a half on this project. I was able to present different aspects of this thesis at various conferences and for this I would like to thank Jason Senkbeil for keeping me ambitious and for his patience through the many hours spent deliberating over the enormous amounts of data generated from this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Harvey Evacuation Behavior Survey Outcomes and Findings
    Coastal Bend Hurricane Evacuation Study: Hurricane Harvey Evacuation Behavior Survey Outcomes and Findings Prepared by Texas A&M Hazard Reduction & Recovery Center University of Washington Institute for Hazard Mitigation Planning and Research and Texas A&M Transportation Institute May 2020 Coastal Bend Hurricane Evacuation Study: Hurricane Harvey Evacuation Behavior Survey Outcomes and Findings Prepared by: Texas A&M Hazard Reduction & Recovery Center (HRRC) University of Washington (UW) Institute for Hazard Mitigation Planning and Research and Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI) Dr. David H. Bierling, TTI & HRRC Dr. Michael K. Lindell, UW Dr. Walter Gillis Peacock, HRRC Alexander Abuabara, HRRC Ryke A. Moore, HRRC Dr. Douglas F. Wunneburger, HRRC James A. (Andy) Mullins III, TTI Darrell W. Borchardt, PE, TTI May 2020 CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................. iv INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 1 SURVEY OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................... 2 Survey Topics
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Report Commissioned By: Hurricane Delta – Its
    Hurricane Delta – Its Wind and Rain Impacts on Louisiana A Preliminary Report – October 12, 2020 By: Don Wheeler, Meteorologist Only 44 days a devastating strike from category 4 Hurricane Laura, Hurricane Delta makes landfall near Creole, Louisiana - approximately 15 miles east from where Hurricane Laura came ashore near Cameron on August 27. Delta was the fourth named tropical system to make landfall in Louisiana this season joining Tropical Storm Cristobal, Tropical Storm Marco, and Hurricane Laura. The previous record was set in 2002 when Tropical Storms Bertha, Hanna, and Isidore joined with Hurricane Lili to strike the state. Delta, like its predecessor Laura, caused widespread power outages across the state and dumped heavy rainfall in excess of 10 inches. Delta began as an area of disturbed weather in the eastern Caribbean the weekend of October 2. Models were indicating tropical formation of this system within a few days as it moved into the central Caribbean. Ahead of the system Tropical Depression 25, soon to become Gamma, was located over the northwestern Caribbean. The National Hurricane Center issued the first advisory on “Potential Tropical Cyclone 26” at 5PM EDT, Sunday October 4 when the storm was just off the southeast coast of Jamaica. The first forecast track took the storm to the northwest over the western tip of Cuba, then into the southeastern Gulf of Mexico where it was to strengthen to hurricane force. Delta was to move to south of the Louisiana coast, then take a northward turn toward southeast Louisiana in response to an approaching trough. With time, this track would shift west and southwest ever so slightly with the eventual landfall occurring in southwest Louisiana.
    [Show full text]