DOCSLIB.ORG

1413 Reflection on Insurrection (Police, White

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1413 Reflection on Insurrection (Police, White #1413 Reflec*on on Insurrec*on (Police, White Supremacy and their Champions) JAY TOMLINSON - HOST, BEST OF THE LEFT: [00:00:00] Welcome to this episode of the award-winning Best of the Le; podcast in which we shall learn about the insurrec>on and police violence through the lens of White supremacy and the rise of the likes of Tucker Carlson who has become the leading spokesman for laundering White supremacist talking points through a marginally respectable facade. Clips today are from All In with Chris Hayes, a progressive faith sermon from Dr. Roger Ray, Last Week Tonight with John Oliver, The Daily Show with Trevor Noah, The Thom Hartmann Program, The Medhi Hassan Show andThe Muckrake Poli>cal podcast. And stay tuned at the end of the show for a big announcement about our first ever live event that you will be able to join and par>cipate in for free from the comfort of your own home. That's coming up on May 10th, and there's a link to detail's in the show notes. You can register just to be reminded there, but again, it's free. And as I said, I'll tell you all about it at the end of the show. But for now, enjoy. Jan. 6 would have been a massacre if police had reacted like it were a BLM protest - All In with Chris Hayes - Air Date 4-14-21 CHRIS HAYES - HOST, ALL IN WITH CHRIS HAYES: [00:01:02] Today was a wrenching day in the Minneapolis area where the trial of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin con>nued as his lawyers put forward their defense for the killing of George Floyd, all the while, in the streets, people are out mourning, angry, protes>ng, chan>ng, trauma>zed about the police shoo>ng and killing of Daunte Wright just a few miles away. And all of this happening as we approach the one year anniversary of George Floyd's death. The inescapable context of this is not just Floyd's death, it is the a;ermath of that death and the protest and the police response to those protests. And it is also inescapably what happened on January sixth at the US Capitol. And taking all this together it is very hard not to see some fundamental contradic>ons and how our country, the state, wields force against its ci>Zens. In terms of who has authority and who defers to whom in a police encounter, and who in the end fears whom. The case of George Floyd, Derrick Chauvin's defense is centered around Floyd being a threat, a figure so fearsome, so terrifying and unruly that he had to be subdued and knelt on for more than nine minutes, long a;er he took his last breaths. In their case, that is how dangerous he was, it's how terrifying he was, and you hear that a lot. Police officers, and they shoot civilian, that they were scared. In the case of Daunte Wright we have a 20 year old man was pulled over for an expired registra>on before officers discovered he had a warrant out for his arrest. And Daunte Wright was treated roughly, manhandled a bit. He was handcuffed. He was ordered around like a supplicant in a way that is fundamentally invasive to his dignity. It's not enjoyable if you've ever been at the other end of that kind of interac>on. When he a^empted to get out of that situa>on, he was shot, killed at point blank range by an officer who says she mistook her gun for a taser. Everything about that interac>on, everything about the George Floyd interac>on, the police are the ones with the authority, the control. They have the weapons on their side. They have the authority of the government. And in both cases, they let both, those men know they are in charge. The same dynamic plays out in so many of the protests we see right a;er these killings, with these enormous shows of police force. You remember Elijah McClain, the 23 year old black man who died in 2019 a;er police restrained him with a chokehold, who begged that he was an introvert, that he hadn't done anything wrong. His death got new a^en>on last summer following George Floyd's killing. And when people congregated to hold a peaceful violin vigil in his memory -- he played that instrument -- this is how the police in Aurora, Colorado responded: they stormed right into a peaceful vigil and ended up pepper spraying unarmed mourners at an event commemora>ng the life of someone killed by police. Now, this is an example, it's a bad one, but we sort of almost took it at random. I mean, this happened last summer in the middle of the largest civil rights protest against police brutality in modern history, literally millions of people par>cipa>ng in every state in the na>on. And it is true, we should be clear, that there are examples, they're documented, you can find video, right, of violence by those and other protesters, examples of lawlessness and property damage throughout the country in the context of tens of thousands of protests. But in the context of tens of thousands of protests and millions and millions of protestors, only a very small percentage of people were violent. And yet the police prepare, prepared and prepare for those protests like they were going to war. I mean, pick the city: Buffalo; New York City; Denver, Colorado; Portland, Oregon; Atlanta, Georgia; wherever. They look like that. They look like they're going to war. They have shields, they have big equipment. And they do that because they want to let people protes>ng know who is in charge, who holds the authority, who will bend the knee to whom. That's the point, explicitly. It's a psychological performance. That's what we saw on the streets of Minneapolis and Brooklyn Center over the last few nights, the show of force with curfews and tear gas and flash bangs. And now just take all of that, all of that footage we've seen before last summer, during last summer, and since, and now. Take all of that and just look for a moment at the u^er inversion of what happened on the steps of the Capitol in January. There was hardly any police presence at all. I mean, there were officers there, right? And I've covered mul>ple protests in Washington,. There tends to be a lot of cops around when people are protes>ng, par>cularly on the mall or the Capitol. But on January 6th, there was rela>vely speaking almost no one there. And they don't have the big MRAPs and the huge bits of equipment brought in, they had these li^le stanchions in front of them. Like they look like bike racks. But it's not just the actual for>fying, the presence, it's also notable in the interac>ons of the police with the people. Again, who's doing the in>mida>ng, who is ordering who around in those interac>ons. During the insurrec>on, it is the overwhelmingly white mob telling the cops what to do. Barking orders at them. It is the mob with the authority. It is the mob that has the cops trying to cajole and nego>ate with the rioters. I mean, you could hardly blame them. They're outnumbered, they're in physical danger. Right? But the fact that it got to that point, the fact that it got to that point, is what's so shocking. ARCHIVE FOOTAGE : [00:06:54] Any chance I can get you guys to leave the Senate wing? We will I just wanna make sure they ain't disrespec>ng the place. I just want to let you guys know. This is like the sacredest place. CHRIS HAYES - HOST, ALL IN WITH CHRIS HAYES: [00:07:07] "Any chance I can get you guys to leave the Capitol?" I mean, how many black folks in this country that are pulled over for a tail light, air freshener. How many get that as the opening line of the officer at the window? That police officer gently asking insurrec>onists to leave the Senate chamber. This was the aktude despite the fact, there are hundreds of people at that moment violently invading the center of American democracy in an explicit a^empt to subvert the peaceful transfer of power. Despite the fact that nearly 150 police officers were injured. Cops have their eyes gouged out and were beaten and tased and crushed and concussed and threatened to be shot with their own guns. And despite all that, there was one, one discharge of a weapon, as far as we know. And fair warning, it is disturbing a watch, the tragic shoo>ng and killing of rioter Ashli Babbi^, at the moment when she was about to bust through a broken window. With hundreds, upon hundreds of screaming, angry people behind her, bea>ng down the window, steps from the chamber that contained at that moment actual members of Congress. And in that moment, as a last resort, that officer there, fired a gun, fired one shot and he killed her. Today, the Jus>ce Department said it will not file charges against the officer who shot Babbi^. And it is awful that she is dead.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Can We Still Talk Things Out?: a Case Study of Campus Hate Speech Regulations at the University of Texas
    Can We Still Talk Things Out?: A Case Study of Campus Hate Speech Regulations at the University of Texas ARI HERBERT† There’s a lot of ugly things in this world, son. I wish I could keep ‘em all away from you. That’s never possible. - Harper Lee, To Kill a Mockingbird INTRODUCTION Intolerance is a persisting issue. The meme “Pepe the Frog” became a common racist and anti-Semitic symbol in the last year, with captions like “kill Jews, man.”1 But this is not a purely American issue either. Local French law tried to ban “modest swimwear.”2 “[F]rom July 2014 to July 2015, in the United Kingdom, there were more than 800 anti-Muslim hate crimes in London. By November 2015, when the terror attacks in Paris occurred, there were 878 reported anti-Muslim attacks in that city alone. Additionally, in Germany, the number of racially motivated attacks [was] higher than any year since the end of World War II.”3 This article focuses on hate particularly as it manifests itself as speech on American university campuses. Specifically, this article turns to recent incidents on and the response by the University of Texas at Austin. The aim in this case study is to analyze how universities may try to preserve speech while simultaneously fostering an inclusive and productive environment— surely a legitimate prerogative.4 In Part I of this article, I explain the recent hate speech incidents at the University of Texas and the University’s response. In Part II, I assess the constitutional issues in the University’s responses, and I identify a potential future difficulty that the University may have to face.
    [Show full text]
  • Download?Doi=10.1.1.133.5901&Rep=Rep1&Type=Pdf Zarei, A
    Volume 3, June 2020 ISSN: 2591 - 801X JALT J o g u n r i n h a c l a o Te f & Ap ng plied Learni Vol.3 No.1 (2020) Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching DOI: https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1 Editor-in-Chief Jürgen Rudolph Editor-in-Chief Jürgen Rudolph, Kaplan Higher Education Singapore Associate Editors Joey Crawford, University of Tasmania Margarita Kefalaki, Communication Institute of Greece Nigel Starck, University of South Australia Shannon Tan, Kaplan Higher Education Singapore Eric Yeo Zhiwei, Kaplan Higher Education Singapore Editorial Board James Adonopoulos, Kaplan Business School, Australia Nelson Ang, Kaplan Higher Education Singapore William Baker, University of Tasmania, Australia Abhishek Bhati, James Cook University, Singapore Rob Burton, Griffith University, Australia Mike Christie, Kaplan Higher Education Singapore Joseph Crawford, University of Tasmania, Australia Ailson De Moraes, Royal Holloway, University of London, UK Fotini Diamantidaki, University College London, UK Michael D. Evans, Kaplan Higher Education Singapore Lucy Gill-Simmen, Royal Holloway, University of London, UK Matt Glowatz, University College Dublin, Ireland Lena Itangata, University of Portsmouth, UK Rhys Johnson, Kaplan Higher Education Singapore Margarita Kefalaki, Communication Institute of Greece Bashar Malkawi, University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates Paola A. Magni, Murdoch University, Singapore Justin O’Brien, Royal Holloway, University of London, UK Orna O’Brien, University College Dublin, Ireland Can-Seng Ooi, University of Tasmania,
    [Show full text]
  • How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics
    GETTY CORUM IMAGES/SAMUEL How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics By Simon Clark July 2020 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics By Simon Clark July 2020 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 4 Tracing the origins of white supremacist ideas 13 How did this start, and how can it end? 16 Conclusion 17 About the author and acknowledgments 18 Endnotes Introduction and summary The United States is living through a moment of profound and positive change in attitudes toward race, with a large majority of citizens1 coming to grips with the deeply embedded historical legacy of racist structures and ideas. The recent protests and public reaction to George Floyd’s murder are a testament to many individu- als’ deep commitment to renewing the founding ideals of the republic. But there is another, more dangerous, side to this debate—one that seeks to rehabilitate toxic political notions of racial superiority, stokes fear of immigrants and minorities to inflame grievances for political ends, and attempts to build a notion of an embat- tled white majority which has to defend its power by any means necessary. These notions, once the preserve of fringe white nationalist groups, have increasingly infiltrated the mainstream of American political and cultural discussion, with poi- sonous results. For a starting point, one must look no further than President Donald Trump’s senior adviser for policy and chief speechwriter, Stephen Miller. In December 2019, the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Hatewatch published a cache of more than 900 emails2 Miller wrote to his contacts at Breitbart News before the 2016 presidential election.
    [Show full text]
  • The Occidental Observer, Reflects a Sane Approach to What the Coronavirus Represents
    THE WEST’S DARKEST HOUR THE SITE OF A MAN FUSED TO A WEIRWOOD TREE Dissident right insanity The Ferdinand Bardamu article I was mentioning yesterday, published on The Occidental Observer, reflects a sane approach to what the coronavirus represents. But a considerable percentage of the dissident-right folk are, literally, insane. Unlike one of my old friends with whom I spoke about the trauma model of mental disorders in the Start reading this!: previous decade, among my racialist readers no If an Aryan man of noble one has thoroughly considered what I say in Day feelings comes to visit this of Wrath where I use terms like ‘psychogenesis’, site, I can assure him that ‘psychoclasses’ and ‘paleologic thought’. If the Day of Wrath content were popular among reading four books will racialists, the conceptual bases for understanding transfigure his way of cognitive distortions in humans in general, including the dissident seeing the world. right, would be better understood. These books are: Hellstorm Today, for example, Hunter Wallace complains about the insults by Thomas Goodrich, the he received from a recalcitrant coronavirus sceptic: abridged version of The Gulag Archipelago, and two There are people who are “dissidents” in the sense that they books that appear within believe things like the earth is flat, the moon landing was a hoax, The Fair Race, whose image the victims of mass shootings are “crisis actors,” viruses are not appears below: Rome vs. real, microchips are being implanted in our brains to create “a Judea and Who We Are (PDF worldwide slave grid,” SARS is the flu, women are the enemy of here, hard copy here).
    [Show full text]
  • Capitol Insurrection at Center of Conservative Movement
    Capitol Insurrection At Center Of Conservative Movement: At Least 43 Governors, Senators And Members Of Congress Have Ties To Groups That Planned January 6th Rally And Riots. SUMMARY: On January 6, 2021, a rally in support of overturning the results of the 2020 presidential election “turned deadly” when thousands of people stormed the U.S. Capitol at Donald Trump’s urging. Even Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, who rarely broke with Trump, has explicitly said, “the mob was fed lies. They were provoked by the President and other powerful people.” These “other powerful people” include a vast array of conservative officials and Trump allies who perpetuated false claims of fraud in the 2020 election after enjoying critical support from the groups that fueled the Capitol riot. In fact, at least 43 current Governors or elected federal office holders have direct ties to the groups that helped plan the January 6th rally, along with at least 15 members of Donald Trump’s former administration. The links that these Trump-allied officials have to these groups are: Turning Point Action, an arm of right-wing Turning Point USA, claimed to send “80+ buses full of patriots” to the rally that led to the Capitol riot, claiming the event would be one of the most “consequential” in U.S. history. • The group spent over $1.5 million supporting Trump and his Georgia senate allies who claimed the election was fraudulent and supported efforts to overturn it. • The organization hosted Trump at an event where he claimed Democrats were trying to “rig the election,” which he said would be “the most corrupt election in the history of our country.” • At a Turning Point USA event, Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Testimony of Lecia Brooks Chief of Staff, Southern Poverty Law Center
    Testimony of Lecia Brooks Chief of Staff, Southern Poverty Law Center before the Subcommittee on National Security, International Development and Monetary Policy Committee on Financial Services United States House of Representatives Dollars against Democracy: Domestic Terrorist Financing in the Aftermath of Insurrection February 25, 2021 My name is Lecia Brooks. I am chief of staff of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Now in our 50th year, the SPLC is a catalyst for racial justice in the South and beyond, working in partnership with communities to dismantle white supremacy, strengthen intersectional movements, and advance the human rights of all people. SPLC lawyers have worked to shut down some of the nation’s most violent white supremacist groups by winning crushing, multimillion-dollar jury verdicts on behalf of their victims. We have helped dismantle vestiges of Jim Crow, reformed juvenile justice practices, shattered barriers to equality for women, children, the LGBTQ+ community, and the disabled, and worked to protect low-wage immigrant workers from exploitation. The SPLC began tracking white supremacist activity in the 1980s, during a resurgence of the Ku Klux Klan and other organized extremist hate groups. Today, the SPLC is the premier U.S. nonprofit organization monitoring the activities of domestic hate groups and other extremists. In the early 1990s, the SPLC launched its pioneering Teaching Tolerance program to provide educators with free, anti-bias classroom resources, such as classroom documentaries and lesson plans. Now renamed Learning For Justice, our program reaches millions of schoolchildren with award-winning curricula and other materials that promote understanding of our nation’s history and respect for others, helping educators create inclusive, equitable school environments.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Rhetorical Analysis of Selected White Supremacist Hate Sites Peter Weinberg
    Rhode Island College Digital Commons @ RIC Honors Projects Overview Honors Projects Spring 2011 A Critical Rhetorical Analysis of Selected White Supremacist Hate Sites Peter Weinberg Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.ric.edu/honors_projects Part of the Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication Commons Recommended Citation Weinberg, Peter, "A Critical Rhetorical Analysis of Selected White Supremacist Hate Sites" (2011). Honors Projects Overview. 50. https://digitalcommons.ric.edu/honors_projects/50 This Honors is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Projects at Digital Commons @ RIC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Projects Overview by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ RIC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Contents: Chapter 1: The Problem: Page 1 Chapter 2: International Attempts to Regulate the Problem: Page 13 Chapter 3: A General Assessment of the Threat Posed to Youth: Page 21 Chapter 4: Selection of Sites: Page 30 . Content Analysis Chart: Page 33 Chapter 5: Rhetorical Analysis of Selected Hate Sites: Page 35 . Part I: Page 35 . Artifact (1): Page 36 . Artifact (2): Page 42 . Artifact (3): Page 50 . Part II: Page 58 . Part III: Page 66 Chapter 6: Findings, Implications, and Conclusion: Page 73 Appendix: Page 84 Bibliography: Page 88 Chapter 1: The Problem Introduction to the Problem Hate, as a principle, is a word that usually carries with it negative connotations, and when put into practice, should always be taken seriously. On the internet, however, this is not always the case. In the virtual world, hate is becoming more and more common, is increasingly easy to propagate, and is easily accessible by nearly anyone, including youth.
    [Show full text]
  • January 11, 2021 NCRI Assessment of the Capitol Riots Violent Actors and Ideologies Behind the Events
    NCRI Assessment of the Capitol Riots Violent Actors and Ideologies Behind the Events of January 6, 2021. Former Congressman Denver Riggleman Strategist, The Network Contagion Research Institute Alex Goldenberg Lead Intelligence Analyst, The Network Contagion Research Institute Joel Finkelstein Director, The Network Contagion Research Institute Senior Research Fellow, Miller Center for Community Protection and Resilience, Rutgers University John Farmer Former New Jersey State Attorney General and Senior Counsel, 9/11 Commission Director, Miller Center for Community Protection and Resilience, Rutgers University Brian Harrell Strategic Advisor, The Network Contagion Research Institute Former Assistant Secretary for Infrastructure Protection at DHS Danica Finkelstein Intelligence Analyst, The Network Contagion Research Institute Lea Marchl Intelligence Analyst, The Network Contagion Research Institute The Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI) is a neutral and independent third party whose mission it is to track, expose, and combat misinformation, deception, manipulation, and hate across social media channels. On January 6th, President Trump’s “Save America” rally was attended by a majority of peaceful protestors. However, a sizable crowd left the speech delivered by the President and overwhelmed law enforcement officials in order to break into the U.S. Capitol building during the certification of the electoral vote. While a majority of attendees remained peaceful, many participated in the violent storming and looting of the U.S. Capitol building. These events saw law enforcement evacuate lawmakers, Capitol offices burglarized and left 5 dead and many wounded. The cause(s) of these events are several-fold according to NCRI’s analytical assessment: Bottom Line Up Front: ​ ● Virtually all violent vanguard elements appeared to come from predominantly far-right, fringe groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Unprovoked Assault of Lt. Nazario and Needless Death of Daunte Wright Underscores Need for Police Reform UNPROVOKED ASSAULT of LT
    Chattanooga News Chronicle - April 22, 2021 Page 8 Chattanooga News Chronicle - April 22, 2021 NATIONAL Unprovoked Assault of Lt. Nazario and Needless Death of Daunte Wright Underscores Need for Police Reform UNPROVOKED ASSAULT OF LT. NAZARIO AND NEEDLESS DEATH OF DAUNTE WRIGHT THROW YET MORE LIGHT ON AN ALREADY-GLARING NEED FOR POLICE REFORM N E W Y O R K ( N a t i o n a l U r b a n L e a g u e ) – National Urban League President and CEO Marc traffic stop. the officers, and that Derek Chauvin continued using H. Morial issued the following statement in response “Our hearts are with the family of Daunte Wright, deadly force long after even the possibility of a threat to the killing of Daunte Wright and the assault of taken at just 20 years old, by an officer so poorly- had passed. Video of Daunte Wright’s fatal shooting Army Lt. Caron Nazario by police in Minnesota and trained and so eager to use excessive force that she and Lt. Nazario’s vicious assault make it clear that Virginia: allegedly mistook a gun for a taser. neither of them posed a threat to the officers who at- “Our sympathy and support goes out to Lt. tacked them. “Over the last few days the nation once again Caron Nazario who was pelted with death threats and “Also swept aside is any excuse for the Senate’s watched a young Black man, pulled over by police conflicting demands before his unwarranted and un- delay in passing the George Floyd Justice in Policing in what appears to be a pretextual stop, shot to death provoked assault.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of 'Stop the Steal' Post-Election Trajectories for Right-Wing Mobilization in the Us
    DECEMBER 2020 THE FUTURE OF 'STOP THE STEAL' POST-ELECTION TRAJECTORIES FOR RIGHT-WING MOBILIZATION IN THE US About the US Crisis Monitor ​ The US Crisis Monitor supports data-driven initiatives to build community ​ resilience and facilitate efforts to track, prevent, and mitigate political violence in America. A joint project of the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) and the Bridging Divides Initiative (BDI) at Princeton University, the US Crisis Monitor provides the public with real-time data ​ and analysis on political violence and demonstrations around the country, establishing an evidence base from which to identify risks, hotspots, and available resources to empower local communities in times of crisis. Contents Introduction 4 Shifting Trends: Pre- and Post-Election 7 Dominant Protest Movements 7 Armed Group Activity 11 Potential Trajectories 15 (1) Demonstrations limited largely to militia groups 15 (2) Mass mobilization of decentralized, armed individuals 18 (3) Increasing attacks by violent sole perpetrators 19 (4) Unarmed mass mobilization 21 Conclusion 23 2 Authors Dr. Roudabeh Kishi is the Director of Research & Innovation at ACLED. She oversees the quality, ​ production, and coverage of all ACLED data across the globe; leads research and analysis across regional teams; aids in new partnerships with local sources and users; and supports the capacity building of NGOs and conflict observatories around the world. Dr. Kishi holds a Ph.D. in Government and Politics from the University of Maryland with specializations in international relations and quantitative methodology. Hampton Stall is a Senior Researcher at ACLED and a conflict anthropologist with a Masters in Development Practice from Emory University.
    [Show full text]
  • Racially Diverse Schools Create Academic and Social Benefits to White Children That Better Prepare Them for the Multicultural World in Which They Will Live and Work
    THE WHITE INTEREST IN SCHOOL INTEGRATION Robert A. Garda, Jr.* Abstract Discussions concerning desegregation, affirmative action, and voluntary integration focus primarily, if not exclusively, on whether such policies harm or benefit minorities. Scant attention is paid to the benefits whites receive in multiracial schools, despite white interests underpinning more than thirty years of Supreme Court integration jurisprudence. In this Article, I explore the academic and social benefits whites receive in multiracial schools, and I do so from a white parent‘s perspective. The Article begins by describing the interest-convergence theory and how white interests explain the course and content of the Supreme Court‘s desegregation and affirmative action jurisprudence. Multiracial schools will not be created or sustained unless white parents believe it to be in their children‘s best interest. The Article next describes the extreme racial segregation in schools today and how white children are the most racially isolated students. This isolation exacerbates the unconscious and automatic racial bias that infects everyone and will impair white children‘s ability to successfully navigate the multicultural marketplace. Integrated schools, however, help de-bias white children and teach them cross-cultural competence, a skill they need to effectively participate in a market with increasingly multicultural customers, co-workers, and global business partners. The Article ends by describing steps white parents can take to effectively integrate schools and
    [Show full text]
  • Reportedly at the Hands of White Nationalists
    TRUMP AND HIS SURROGATES LOUDLY PEDDLED DEBUNKED RIGHT-WING CONSPIRACY THEORIES TIED TO QANON AND WHITE SUPREMACISTS, GIVING THEM FALSE LEGITIMACY SUMMARY As Trump and his allies searched for justifications to claim electoral victory, the far-right online community played a pivotal role in originating claims for the campaign to push. Conspiracies from white supremacists, QAnon supporters, and long-time conspiracy theorists were elevated, disseminated, and pushed out by the president and his allies. There seems to be a direct flow from the furthest right reaches of the internet and the official spokespeople of the president —including the president himself — such as: • The president promoting numerical figures developed by “TheDonald.Win” — an online community founded to openly post hate speech and calls to violence — in an attempt to prove his false voter fraud claims. • Promoting “Stop The Steal” events planned by white supremacists, including one that led to a stabbing reportedly at the hands of white nationalists. • Lending credibility to the mysterious, propagandic twitter account “Election Wizard,” which promotes election conspiracy theories and follows noted white supremacists and QAnon accounts. • Using a QAnon promoted conspiracy to fire a top elections cybersecurity official. TABLE OF CONTENTS Donald Trump Promoted Numerical Figures Developed By “TheDonald.Win”—An Online Community Founded To Openly Post Hate Speech And Calls To Violence In An Attempt To Prove His False Voter Fraud Claims ................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]