DOCSLIB.ORG

Archiv Des Deutschen Kolonialrechts Dr. Norbert B. Wagner

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archiv Des Deutschen Kolonialrechts Dr. Norbert B. Wagner Archiv des Deutschen Kolonialrechts herausgegeben von Dr. Norbert B. Wagner Brühl/Wesseling 2. berichtigte Aufl. Juni 2008 Inhalt A. REICHSVERFASSUNGSRECHT.............................................................................................................................................. 7 1. VERFASSUNG VON 1871......................................................................................................................................................... 7 2. VERFASSUNG VON 1918....................................................................................................................................................... 10 3. VERORDNUNG VOM 14.11.1918........................................................................................................................................... 11 4. GESETZ VOM 10.02.1919....................................................................................................................................................... 12 5. GESETZ VOM 04.03.1919....................................................................................................................................................... 14 6. WEIMARER VERFASSUNG VON 1919................................................................................................................................ 15 B. (BUNDES- UND) REICHSGESETZGEBUNG........................................................................................................................ 17 7. GESETZ VOM 01.11.1867....................................................................................................................................................... 17 8. GESETZ VOM 08.11.1867....................................................................................................................................................... 19 9. GESETZ VOM 01.06.1870....................................................................................................................................................... 21 10. GESETZ VOM 20.12.1875....................................................................................................................................................... 22 11. GESETZ VOM 10.07.1879....................................................................................................................................................... 23 12. SCHUTZGEBIETSGESETZ VON 1886 .................................................................................................................................. 25 13. SCHUTZGEBIETSGESETZ VON 1887 .................................................................................................................................. 26 14. GESETZ VOM 27.01.1877....................................................................................................................................................... 27 15. SCHUTZGEBIETSGESETZ VON 1888 .................................................................................................................................. 28 16. GESETZ VOM 02.02.1889....................................................................................................................................................... 31 17. GESETZ VOM 06.07.1890....................................................................................................................................................... 32 18. GESETZ VOM 30.03.1892....................................................................................................................................................... 33 19. BÜRGERLICHES GESETZBUCH VOM 18.08.1896.............................................................................................................. 34 20. SCHUTZGEBIETSGESETZ VON 1889 .................................................................................................................................. 35 21. GESETZ VOM 15.02.1900....................................................................................................................................................... 36 22. SCHUTZGEBIETSGESETZ VON 1900 .................................................................................................................................. 37 23. SCHUTZGEBIETSGESETZ VON 1912 .................................................................................................................................. 40 24. SCHUTZGEBIETSGESETZ VON 1913 .................................................................................................................................. 43 25. GESETZ VOM 22.05.1910....................................................................................................................................................... 46 26. GESETZ VOM 08.06.1910....................................................................................................................................................... 47 27. KONSULARGERICHTSBARBEITSGESETZ VON 1911 ...................................................................................................... 48 28. GESETZ VOM 22.07.1913....................................................................................................................................................... 51 29. GESETZ VOM 20.08.1975....................................................................................................................................................... 53 C. KAISERLICHE VERORDNUNGEN ....................................................................................................................................... 54 30. VERORDNUNG VOM 05.06.1886........................................................................................................................................... 54 31. VERORDNUNG VOM 19.07.1886........................................................................................................................................... 55 32. VERORDNUNG VOM 13.09.1886........................................................................................................................................... 56 33. VERORDNUNG VOM 11.01.1887........................................................................................................................................... 57 34. VERORDNUNG VOM 18.11.1887........................................................................................................................................... 58 35. VERORDNUNG VOM 21.12.1887........................................................................................................................................... 59 36. VERORDNUNG VOM 02.07.1888........................................................................................................................................... 60 37. VERORDNUNG VOM 07.07.1888........................................................................................................................................... 61 38. VERORDNUNG VOM 13.07.1888........................................................................................................................................... 62 39. VERORDNUNG VOM 07.02.1890........................................................................................................................................... 63 40. VERORDNUNG VOM 06.05.1890........................................................................................................................................... 64 41. VERORDNUNG VOM 10.08.1890........................................................................................................................................... 65 42. VERORDNUNG VOM 01.01.1891........................................................................................................................................... 66 43. VERORDNUNG VOM 15.06.1892........................................................................................................................................... 67 44. VERORDNUNG VOM 02.05.1894........................................................................................................................................... 68 45. VERORDNUNG VOM 25.02.1896........................................................................................................................................... 69 46. VERORDNUNG VOM 15.10.1897........................................................................................................................................... 70 47. VERORDNUNG VOM 27.04.1898........................................................................................................................................... 71 48. VERORDNUNG VOM 18.07.1899........................................................................................................................................... 72 49. VERORDNUNG VOM 27.03.1899........................................................................................................................................... 73 50. VERORDNUNG VOM 17.02.1900........................................................................................................................................... 74 51. VERORDNUNG VOM 17.02.1900........................................................................................................................................... 75 52. VERORDNUNG VOM 25.10.1900..........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Constitution of the Independent State of Samoa 1960
    SAMOA CONSTITUTION OF THE INDEPENDENT STATE OF SAMOA Arrangement of Provisions PART I 16. O le Ao o le Malö INDEPENDENT STATE 17. Repealed OF SAMOA AND ITS 18. Election of Head of State SUPREME LAW 19. Term of office of Head of State 1. Name and description 20. Disabilities of Head of State 2. The Supreme law 21. Resignation and removal from office PART II 22. Salary of Head of State FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 23. Absence or incapacity 24. Special provisions as to ab- 3. Definition of the State sence or incapacity 4. Remedies for enforcement of 25. Council of Deputies rights 26. Head of State to act on 5. Right to life advice 6. Right to personal liberty 27. Information for Head of 7. Freedom from inhuman State treatment 28. Oath of office 8. Freedom from forced labour 29. Public Seal 9. Right to a fair trial 30. Secretary to Head of State 10. Rights concerning criminal law PART IV 11. Freedom of religion EXECUTIVE 12. Rights concerning religious instruction 31. Executive power 13. Rights regarding freedom of 32. Cabinet speech, assembly, 33. Vacation of office association, movement and 34. Official oath residence 35. Assignment of 14. Rights regarding property responsibilities to Ministers 15. Freedom from discriminatory 36. Summoning of Cabinet legislation 37. Cabinet procedure 38. When decisions of Cabinet PART III are to take effect HEAD OF STATE 39. Executive Council 2 Constitution of the Independent State of Samoa 40. Consideration of Cabinet 66. Constitution of the Supreme decisions by Executive Court Council 67. Tenure, suspension and 41.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations from Papers Presented
    GOVERNMENT OF SAMOA Ministry of Health Summary of Recommendations. National Symposium on Mental Health Issues in Samoa. Kitano-Tusitala Hotel, 8-11 April 2003. The symposium is a new beginning for positive change to improve public awareness and attitudes on mental health issues and thereby promotes a greater integration between community-based social groups and governmental mental health services. Leota Dr Lisi Petaia, Mental Health Unit Assisted by Galumalemana Steven Percival 30 May 2003 FAO Conference Room Published by: Ministry of Health Government of Samoa Copyright Government of Samoa 2003 ISBN: This document, in electronic or hard format, may be purchased from: Ministry of Health Government of Samoa Private Bag, Apia, Samoa This Summary of Recommendations made at the National Symposium on Mental Health Issues in Samoa held 8-11 April 2003 has been produced under the direction of Lolofietele Taulealeausumai Dr Eti Enosa, Chief Executive Officer of the Ministry of Health, the Government of Samoas key agency for mental health services. A companion book entitled Final Report of a National Symposium on Mental Health is also available. Organising Committee: Symposium Coordinator: Leota Dr. Lisi Petaia Samau Ieru Lokeni Professor Pelenatete Stowers Tafao Fesilafai Pisaina Tago Aliilelei Tenari Ualesi Silva Leotele Amosa DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this publication is based on presentations, discussions and recommendations made during the National Symposium on Mental Health in Samoa, held April 811, 2003. No liability will be accepted by the Ministry of Health, the authors, editors or publishers for actions taken by any person on the strength of this information alone. The Ministry of Health authorises the reproduction of textual material, tables and charts, provided appropriate acknowledgement is given, viz., National Symposium on Mental Health, Samoa Ministry of Health (2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Fetuunai Muniao Lipoti O Suesuega Galuega Faatino 1
    FETUUNAI MUNIAO LIPOTI O SUESUEGA GALUEGA FAATINO 1 “Suesue ma Iloilo tulafono a Samoa; ia atagia tu ma aganuu a Samoa i totonu o le Tulafono Faavae, i totonu o aiaiga o le Tulafono Faavae.” 1 © Samoa Law Reform Commission Table of Contents BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................... 3 1. PART 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 4 A. Government .......................................................................................................... 4 B. Parliament XVIth Symposium ......................................................................... 5 C. Other Materials Relied Upon .......................................................................... 6 2. PART 2: CURRENT STATUS OF CUSTOM IN SAMOA’S LAWS ............................. 7 A. Custom in the Constitution ............................................................................. 7 B. Custom in the Current Acts of Parliament of Samoa ............................ 8 3. PART 3: CUSTOM IN THE COURT JUDGMENTS OF SAMOA ............................. 12 A. Courts Jurisdiction on Customary Matters ............................................ 12 B. Guidelines for Judicial Procedures............................................................ 13 4. PART 4: CUSTOM IN PACIFIC ISLANDS CONSTITUTIONS and LAW REFORM LEGISLATION .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo-American Isthmian Diplomacy and the Clayton-Bulwer Treaty
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 6-1965 Anglo-American Isthmian Diplomacy and the Clayton-Bulwer Treaty George W. Shipman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Shipman, George W., "Anglo-American Isthmian Diplomacy and the Clayton-Bulwer Treaty" (1965). Master's Theses. 3906. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3906 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ANGLO-AMERICAN ISTHMIAN DIPLOMACY - AND THE CLAYTON-BULWER TREATY by George Shipman w. � A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the Degree of Master of Arts Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan June 1965 ACI<NOWLEDGENiENTS The author wishes to express his appreciation to Dr. Edward .N. MacConomy, Ghief of. the Stack and Reader Division of the Library of Congress, for his assistance in mastering that wonderful library. The author was saddened by the deaths of Dr. Charles C. Tansill and Mr. Donald Mugridge, both of whom rendered valuable bibliographical advice, particularly in the National Archives collections. Special thanks are due Dr. Willis F. Dunbar for his invaluable suggestions and advice on the style and content of this investigation. George w. Shipman ii Introduction The Panama Canal is one of the major commercial waterways of the world and, furthermore, it is vital to the defence of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Waro Documents
    DOCUMENTS 1) Treaty of Paris (February 10, 1763) The definitive Treaty of Peace and Friendship between his Britannick Majesty, the Most Christian King, and the King of Spain. Concluded at Paris the 10th day of February, 1763. To which the King of Portugal acceded on the same day. In the Name of the Most Holy and Undivided Trinity, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. So be it. Be it known to all those whom it shall, or may, in any manner, belong, It has pleased the Most High to diffuse the spirit of union and concord among the Princes, whose divisions had spread troubles in the four parts of the world, and to inspire them with the inclination to cause the comforts of peace to succeed to the misfortunes of a long and bloody war, which having arisen between England and France during the reign of the Most Serene and Most Potent Prince, George the Second, by the grace of God, King of Great Britain, of glorious memory, continued under the reign of the Most Serene and Most Potent Prince, George the Third, his successor, and, in its progress, communicated itself to Spain and Portugal: Consequently, the Most Serene and Most Potent Prince, George the Third, by the grace of God, King of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, Duke of Brunswick and Lunenbourg, Arch Treasurer and Elector of the Holy Roman Empire; the Most Serene and Most Potent Prince, Lewis the Fifteenth, by the grace of God, Most Christian King; and the Most Serene and Most Potent Prince, Charles the Third, by the grace of God, King of Spain and of the Indies, after having laid the foundations of peace in the preliminaries signed at Fontainebleau the third of November last; and the Most Serene and Most Potent Prince, Don Joseph the First, by the grace of God, King of Portugal and of the Algarves, after having acceded thereto, determined to compleat, without delay, this great and important work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paris Peace Treaty of 1783 in the Name of the Most Holy and Undivided Trinity
    The Paris Peace Treaty of 1783 In the name of the most holy and undivided Trinity. It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent Prince George the Third, by the grace of God, king of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, arch‐ treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc., and of the United States of America, to forget all past misunderstandings and differences that have unhappily interrupted the good correspondence and friendship which they mutually wish to restore, and to establish such a beneficial and satisfactory intercourse , between the two countries upon the ground of reciprocal advantages and mutual convenience as may promote and secure to both perpetual peace and harmony; and having for this desirable end already laid the foundation of peace and reconciliation by the Provisional Articles signed at Paris on the 30th of November 1782, by the commissioners empowered on each part, which articles were agreed to be inserted in and constitute the Treaty of Peace proposed to be concluded between the Crown of Great Britain and the said United States, but which treaty was not to be concluded until terms of peace should be agreed upon between Great Britain and France and his Britannic Majesty should be ready to conclude such treaty accordingly; and the treaty between Great Britain and France having since been concluded, his Britannic Majesty and the United States of America, in order to carry into full effect the Provisional
    [Show full text]
  • SAMOA. Relgning K'ing.-L\Ialietoa Laupepa, Restored November 9, 1889
    SAMOA. Relgning K'ing.-l\ialietoa Laupepa, restored November 9, 1889. Group of 14 volcanic islands in the South Pacific, the chief of which are U polu, Savaii, and 'I'utuila. At a Samoan conference at Berlin in 1889, at which Great Britain, Germany, and the United States were represented, an Act was signed (June 14) guaranteeing the neutrality of the islands, in which the citizens of the three signatory Powers have equal rights of residence, trade, and personal protection. The three Powers recognise the independence of the Samoan Government, and the free rights of the natives to elect their chief or king, and choose the form of government according to their own laws and customs. A supreme court is established, consisting of one judge, who is styled Chief Justice of Samoa. To this Court are referred (1) all civil suits concerningreal property situated in Samoa; (2) all civil suits of any kind be­ tween natives and foreigners, or between foreigners of different nationalities; (3) all crimes and offences committed by natives against foreigners, or com­ mitted by such foreigners as are not subject to any consular jurisdiction. All future alienation of lands is prohibited, with certain specified excep­ tions. A local administration is provided for the municipal district of Apia. Apia in the island of Upolu is the capital and centre of government. Area, 1,701 square miles ; population, about 34,000, of which 16,600 ill Upolu, 12,500 in Savaii, 3,750 in Tntuila. The natives are Polynesians. There were in 1891, 235 British-born subjects (163 males and 72 females), about 90 Germans, and a few of other nationalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Extradition Treaty Between His Majesty, in Respect of the United Kingdom, and His Majesty the King of Iraq
    EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN HIS MAJESTY, IN RESPECT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM, AND HIS MAJESTY THE KING OF IRAQ His Majesty the King of Great Britain, Ireland, and the British Dominions beyond the Seas, Emperor of India, and His Majesty the King of Iraq, DESIRING to make provision for the reciprocal extradition of criminals, HAVE RESOLVED to conclude a Treaty for that purpose, and to that end have appointed as their plenipotentiaries: His Majesty the King of Great Britain, Ireland, and the British Dominions beyond the Seas, Emperor of India: For Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Lieutenant-Colonel Sir Francis Henry Humphrys, Knight Grand Cross of the Most Distinguished Order of Saint Michael and Saint George, Knight Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order, Knight Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire, Companion of the Most Eminent Order of the Indian Empire, High Commissioner of His Britannic Majesty in Iraq; His Majesty the King of Iraq: General Ja'far Pasha al Askari, Order of Al Rafidain, Second Class, Companion of the Most Distinguished Order of Saint Michael and Saint George, Minister for Foreign Affairs; Who, having communicated their full powers, found in good and due form, have agreed as follows: Article 1 The High Contracting Parties engage to deliver up to each other, under certain circumstances and conditions stated in the present Treaty, those persons who, being accused or convicted of any of the crimes or offences enumerated in Article 3, committed within the jurisdiction of the one party, shall be found within the territory of the other party.
    [Show full text]
  • 5Th ASIA-PACIFIC JUDICIAL COLLOQUIUM LITIGATION CONFERENCE 2019 FAMILY CONFERENCE 2019: SUPPORTING, HEALING & RECONSTRUCTING
    ISSUE 02 • SEP 2019 5th ASIA-PACIFIC JUDICIAL LITIGATION FAMILY CONFERENCE COLLOQUIUM CONFERENCE 2019 2019: SUPPORTING, HEALING & RECONSTRUCTING SEP 2019 02 HIGHLIGHTS HIGHLIGHTS 5th Asia-Pacific Judicial Colloquium 01 Litigation Conference 2019 03 Family Conference 2019: 04 Supporting, Healing & Reconstructing th EVENTS & INITIATIVES 5 ASIA-PACIFIC Harnessing Technology to Enhance 05 International Knowledge Exchange JUDICIAL COLLOQUIUM FJC’s Family Judges’ Learning Week 06 The biennial event was attended by Chief Justices and Judges from the apex courts of Australia, Canada, Hong 2019 Kong, New Zealand and Singapore. They had congregated at the Supreme Court of Singapore for a frank, open and rich discussion on issues centred on court administration and recent development in the law of contract and Fundraising Carnivals by the 07 equitable compensation, as well as current issues in Public and International Law. Singapore Courts Some of the topics discussed at the colloquium included – Civil Justice Reforms, Maintaining the Dignity of the Court State Courts Reach Out to 08 in the Face of Criticism, Contractual Interpretation, Equitable Compensation for Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Climate the Community Change and the Law, as well as the Hague Convention and Transnational Custody Disputes. th State Courts Strive for a 09 The 5 Asia-Pacific Judicial Colloquium commenced with a welcome reception on the evening of 27 May at the Digital-ready Workforce Supreme Court and concluded with a social programme on 30 May at Jewel Changi Airport for all
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Court Trend Report
    Pacific Judicial Development Programme 2014 Court Trend Report JUNE 2015 PJDP is funded by the Government of New Zealand and managed by the Federal Court of Australia The information in this publication may be reproduced with suitable acknowledgement. Published in June 2015. © New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Prepared by Cate Sumner for the Federal Court of Australia. Enquiries Federal Court of Australia Locked Bag A6000 Sydney NSW 1235 Email [email protected] Web http://www.fedcourt.gov.au/pjdp Pacific Judicial Development Programme 2014 Court Trend Report JUNE 2015 The Pacific Judicial Development Programme is a Regional Programme of Assistance Supported by New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade 2 Pacific Judicial Development Programme: 2014 Court Trend Report Trend Report Contributors Research Coordinator and Author Cate Sumner, Court Annual Reporting Adviser In–Country Performance Monitoring Reports supported by: PJDP Jurisdiction Chief Justice National Coordinator Cook Islands Chief Justice Tom Weston Ms Tangi Taoro Federated States Acting Chief Justice Ready Johnny Mr Kapilly Capelle of Micronesia Kiribati Chief Justice Sir John Muria Sister Bernadette Eberi Republic of Chief Justice Carl Ingram Ms Ingrid Kabua Marshall Islands Nauru Chief Justice Joni Madraiwiwi Mr David Toganivalu Niue Chief Justice Patrick Savage Mr Darren Tohovaka Republic of Palau Chief Justice Arthur Ngiraklsong Ms Doran Inabo Papua Chief Justice Sir Salamo Injia Deputy Chief Justice Sir Gibbs Salika New Guinea Samoa Chief Justice Patu Sapolu Justice Vaepule Va’ai Solomon Islands Chief Justice Sir Albert Palmer Ms Myonnie Samani Tokelau Chief Justice Dame Sian Elias Ms Lise Suveinakama Tonga Chief Justice Owen Paulsen Mr Similoni Tu’akalau Tuvalu Chief Justice Sir Gordon Ward Mr Simon Kofe Vanuatu Chief Justice Vincent Lunabek Mr Edwin Macreveth This Report was prepared in collaboration with Nicole Cherry of the Federal Court of Australia (FCA).
    [Show full text]
  • The US Federal Framework and American Samoa
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON BOTHELL Constitutional Ambiguity as Policy: The U.S. Federal Framework and American Samoa Kerry L Francis 6/9/2014 A Capstone project presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Policy Studies, School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, UWB. Acknowledgements I would like to extend my heartfelt appreciation to Professor Camille Walsh for her helpful guidance and indispensable insight in the writing of this paper; and to Professor Johanna Crane, whose comments greatly factored in the paper’s final outcome. Also, I must acknowledge Professors Alan Wood, Bruce Kochis, Daniel Goldhaber, Daniel Jacoby, Keith Nitta, Nives Dolšak, and Shauna Carlisle, whose instruction imparted in me in each their own way, something beyond the learning of the course and program curriculum in the classroom. And finally—to Jennifer—whose steady encouragement, counsel and friendship since those sunny years in high school, bumped and pushed me along to this moment. i For Noah. ii Table of Contents Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………1 Chapter I – the Policy Problem…………………………………………………………………….2 Chapter II – Literature Review……………………………………………………………….........9 Chapter III – Methodology……………………………………………………………………….21 Discussion of Methods…………………………………………………………………...23 Chapter IV – Results and Discussion..............................................................................................26 South Pacific Preludes……………………………………………………………………31 The Deeds of Cession and the Early Phase of
    [Show full text]
  • Midkiff 1933 R.Pdf
    RULES ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII MAY s i. 1948, WITH REGARD TO THE REPRODUCTION OF MASTERS THESES (a) Mo person or corporation may publish or reproduce in any manner, without the consent of the Board of Regents, a thesis which ha's been submitted to the University in partial fulfillm ent of the requirements for an advanced degree, lb) No individual or corporation or other organization may publish quotations or excerpts from a graduate thesis without the consent of the author and of .the University. SA IH TE ÁJMIHI STRATI OS IH TJSSfESI BAHOA by le o r l Loe B§ek MlQMSt ntxim Awrnirznitim m r»m m mmM. by Fcvxl L&ö Beck M ñ k ift T A mRFIB ■mmms m wn fam m m m s mavsBfirx or m m ii m !>/■?.$u z (w m $ m .üiHimaïs r a m n x m m x of MABVm CW AT.m WZTMBTm W HAWAII 1933 Approvo< ! Hawn. IN} CB5 - i - ! H3 Qs. no .32 ^ cop.2 ro oo PREFACE The riin of this study has "boon to make a brief and accurate survey o f the political. and h is to ric a l de­ velopment of T'estera Frnoe, for the purpose of finding out what political institutions existed when the white men first came In contact with the natives, and then de­ termining to whet extent these Institution s have been used by the "tripartite I'owerc, ” Germany and L'ow Zeeland, in tho administration of native affairs* The introductory chapter sets tho sta^a for tho reader, giving him an accurate and clear out picture of the land and the people at the present timo* Then follow s a detailed study of the early t r ib a l government of the Samoans* The h is to ric
    [Show full text]