DOCSLIB.ORG

Lightgeneral Secretary, Mandate Trade

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lightgeneral Secretary, Mandate Trade ONLINE EDITION MANDATE TRADE UNION DECEMBER 2020 SHOPFLOOR NEW DEAL FOR DISTRIBUTION & RETAIL WORKERS P4 UPFRONT GERRY LIGHT P2 l INSIDE STORY DEBENHAMS P20 COVEROPINION STORY FRONT COVER ILLUSTRATION: Barry McGowan 2020 – a year to reflect THIS is the first opportunity I have had to pen that some businesses have done very this piece as the General Secretary of our proud nicely as a direct consequence of Covid and distinguished union and I want to say it is a through significant increases in turnover pleasure and honour to do so. and profits. Twelve months ago the term Covid-19 was unknown along UPFRONT Whether it is over the past nine months, with any understanding of the deadly virus to which it re- or indeed as we head into 2021, the best ferred. There can be little doubt that the rapid and intense General Secretary, way of facing uncertainty is not individu- spread of this global pandemic has virtually stopped us all in Gerry Light Mandate Trade Union ally. By acting in this isolated manner it will our tracks and forced us to not only look at always ensure that workers’ interests are how we reorganise our day-to-day lives but placed secondary to those of business and also to reassess the things which are impor- the market. tant beyond those of material value. If nothing else the Covid crisis has shown It is also an opportunity to challenge from a societal perspective what can be the societal and economic norms which achieved through acting collectively. The value a job purely from a financial per- notion of the common good has quite spective instead of asking what contribu- rightly been given a renewed sense of tion it makes to our society as a whole, focus and importance. particularly during a time of national cri- The workplace is merely a microcosm of sis. society. What we need now is to see a trans- Regrettably many sectors, industries and fer of these values by workers into their businesses have been ravaged over the place of work and to help them build an past nine months with the world of retail in understanding of how they can lead to particular being severely impacted. This greater levels of reward, respect, fulfilment stark reality has meant thousands of retail Picture: Jonathan Cutrer, Public Domain and dignity. workers have lost their jobs with others Being a union operating predominantly in They have put themselves literally in the having their incomes seriously depleted. the retail sector, Mandate has along with its line of fire and the least they deserve in re- The power and benefits that can evolve from a collective approach are clearly Those who have remained at work pro- members been very much in the eye of the turn is appropriate appreciation and due storm. Clearly the biggest impact so far has viding what now is generally accepted as consideration. proven all we need to do is reassert our been the loss of more than 1,000 good qual- an essential public service have to face the With the advancement of technology al- confidence in the belief that by joining to- ity retail jobs following the decision of constant threat and worry of contracting lowing for greater levels of automation and gether in common purpose this approach Debenhams to close its Irish operation. the virus. the way these developments have changed will continue to deliver in the future. What has followed over the past nine customers’ shopping habits there can be lit- As the recently appointed General Secre- months is a determined and heroic effort by tle doubt that the shape of traditional bricks tary of Mandate I give you an absolute as- our members who have been involved in and mortar retail has also significantly surance that myself, the staff and members actively picketing, in some cases 24/7, the 11 changed over the past number of years, the of our National Executive Council will con- ex-Debenhams stores in pursuit of a just arrival of Covid has served to accelerate tinue to tirelessly strive to lead our mem- and fair settlement to their industrial dis- these trends considerably. bers through the current challenges facing pute. Notwithstanding the promising news that us. Clearly this has been and continues to be is emerging on a daily basis about potential a long and difficult struggle for the mem- vaccines there can be little doubt the world We will ensure that the interests of our bers involved and we are committed to en- of retail that will emerge post-Covid has the members are always to the forefront – sure that their efforts will not be in vain. potential to be radically different. whether it’s in relation to issues directly im- Also significant numbers of our members This is why Mandate continues to demand pacting them in the workplace or indeed employed in the bar trade have seen their from Government the establishment of a the broader social justice matters that im- livelihoods wiped out with growing uncer- specific taskforce charged with the respon- pact them and their dependents. tainty about the future of the sector and the sibility of identifying supports for the future Never before has the wish for you, your many thousands workers it employs. of traditional bricks and mortar retailing and families and friends to have a happy, safe There is no price too great which can the thousands of jobs it supports. and enjoyable Christmas and New Year be placed on human health and Post-Covid some employers will seek, in been more sincere and appropriate. It’s that is why we will continue to the greedy pursuit of greater profits, to take been a tough year, unfortunately far too prioritise the absolute need to advantage of the situation – in fact, there is ensure that our members who many of us knew those who paid the ulti- evidence that this type of unscrupulous be- mate price. turn up for work on a daily haviour has already started. basis are afforded the great- However, as we head into 2021 let’s do so est levels of protection and Going forward it will be the role of your in the confidence of knowing that if we union in consort with you the members to respect from both employ- continue to have each other’s backs and fight back against these unjustified at- ers and customers alike. commit to acting in unity and common tacks on your hard-won, long-established There must be zero toler- terms and conditions of employment. purpose the future holds more promise ance against behaviour than fear. So let’s stop hoping for a better To those employers who were quick to from any quarter that has new year, instead let’s resolve to do what laud the contributions of their workers dur- the potential to nega- we can within our control to make it hap- tively impact our mem- ing the Covid crisis, we say it is now time to pen. bers’ physical or mental go beyond words of gratitude with other well-being. forms of meaningful recognition and re- Have a great Christmas and New Year, ward. It is hard to escape the ironic reality you deserve it. Shopfloor is published bi-monthly by Mandate Trade Union. Mandate Head Office, O'Lehane House, 9 Cavendish Row, Dublin 1 T: 01-8746321/2/3 F: 01-8729581 W: www.mandate.ie Design & Editing: Brazier Media E: [email protected] W:www.brazier.media Shopfloor is edited, produced and printed by trade union labour 2 SHOPFLOOR y December 2020 NEWS BAH HUMBUG! LLoyds Pharmacy ‘Scrooges’ cancel Xmas staff bonus LLOYDS Pharmacy bosses have been they had of Christmas cheer. country. Lloyds staff kept the pharma‐ Mandate National Coordinator accused of acting like “cold‐hearted One worker, summing up the feel‐ cies open. Lloyds staff made sure that Brian Forbes slammed Lloyds bosses misers” after a Scrooge‐like decision ings of colleagues, said: “We feel we elderly and more vulnerable cus‐ and claimed the move was an “insult” was taken to cancel Christmas bonus should be given a bonus this year tomers were looked after… Lloyds to workers. payments. more than ever.” staff got Covid. Lloyds staff deserve a He told Shopfloor: “To be encour‐ Workers are furious they will not Brian Dowling’s virtual Christmas Christmas bonus.” aged now by the company to engage in now pocket a yearly ‘thank you’ pay‐ social – including festive TikTok ‘Equitable’ TikTok fun and games with Brian ment worth between €150 to €400 videos, games of charades and bingo – Dowling instead of being paid their each. took place on November 21st for Lloyds claimed the Christmas bonus hard‐earned Christmas bonus is And it comes after months of ex‐ pharmacy staff. was withdrawn as part of a new “more traordinary efforts by Lloyds workers Not to be outdone, Mandate mem‐ transparent and equitable” monthly frankly an insult to the tireless and sig‐ to keep the pharmacies open during bers at Lloyds Pharmacy launched a bonus structure to reward employees. nificant sacrifices made by these es‐ the Covid‐19 pandemic. virtual event of their own – an online However, the claim was disputed by sential frontline workers. Workers insisted a special seasonal petition to restore the bonus. Mandate lead organiser Bill Abom “Lloyds Pharmacy bosses are prov‐ online event hosted by former Big The petition stated: “It’s been eight who insisted this did not constitute ing themselves the cold‐hearted mis‐ Brother star Brian Dowling did abso‐ months since Leo Varadkar made his part of the talks arranged to restruc‐ ers and the big bad Scrooge of the Big Brother star Brian Dowling lutely nothing to restore any feelings Covid lockdown announcement to the ture a separate bonus.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Northern Ireland's Snap Assembly Elections: Outcome and Implications
    CRS INSIGHT Northern Ireland's Snap Assembly Elections: Outcome and Implications March 7, 2017 (IN10663) | Related Author Kristin Archick | Kristin Archick, Specialist in European Affairs ([email protected], 7-2668) On March 2, 2017, voters in Northern Ireland—which is one of four component "nations" of the United Kingdom (UK) —went to the polls in snap elections for Northern Ireland's Assembly, its regional legislature. The Assembly is a key institution in Northern Ireland's devolved government, in which specified powers have been transferred from London to Belfast, as set out in the 1998 peace agreement aimed at ending Northern Ireland's 30-year sectarian conflict (in which almost 3,500 people died). The peace accord mandated that power in the devolved government would be shared between Northern Ireland's two dominant communities: unionists, or Protestants who largely define themselves as British and support remaining part of the UK, and nationalists, or Catholics who consider themselves Irish and may desire a united Ireland. (For more information, see CRS Report RS21333, Northern Ireland: The Peace Process.) Since 2007, Assembly elections have produced successive power-sharing governments led by the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) and the nationalist all-Ireland political party Sinn Fein. Assembly elections determine the composition of Northern Ireland's Executive, comprised of ministers in charge of policy departments. Following the May 2016 Assembly elections, DUP leader Arlene Foster and Sinn Fein's northern leader Martin McGuiness returned to head the Executive as First Minister and Deputy First Minister, respectively. Despite a much-improved security situation in Northern Ireland and progress in implementing important aspects of the peace accord, significant divisions and distrust persist between the unionist and nationalist communities and their respective political parties.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2
    1. Debbie Abrahams, Labour Party, United Kingdom 2. Malik Ben Achour, PS, Belgium 3. Tina Acketoft, Liberal Party, Sweden 4. Senator Fatima Ahallouch, PS, Belgium 5. Lord Nazir Ahmed, Non-affiliated, United Kingdom 6. Senator Alberto Airola, M5S, Italy 7. Hussein al-Taee, Social Democratic Party, Finland 8. Éric Alauzet, La République en Marche, France 9. Patricia Blanquer Alcaraz, Socialist Party, Spain 10. Lord John Alderdice, Liberal Democrats, United Kingdom 11. Felipe Jesús Sicilia Alférez, Socialist Party, Spain 12. Senator Alessandro Alfieri, PD, Italy 13. François Alfonsi, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (France) 14. Amira Mohamed Ali, Chairperson of the Parliamentary Group, Die Linke, Germany 15. Rushanara Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 16. Tahir Ali, Labour Party, United Kingdom 17. Mahir Alkaya, Spokesperson for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, Socialist Party, the Netherlands 18. Senator Josefina Bueno Alonso, Socialist Party, Spain 19. Lord David Alton of Liverpool, Crossbench, United Kingdom 20. Patxi López Álvarez, Socialist Party, Spain 21. Nacho Sánchez Amor, S&D, European Parliament (Spain) 22. Luise Amtsberg, Green Party, Germany 23. Senator Bert Anciaux, sp.a, Belgium 24. Rt Hon Michael Ancram, the Marquess of Lothian, Former Chairman of the Conservative Party, Conservative Party, United Kingdom 25. Karin Andersen, Socialist Left Party, Norway 26. Kirsten Normann Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 27. Theresa Berg Andersen, Socialist People’s Party (SF), Denmark 28. Rasmus Andresen, Greens/EFA, European Parliament (Germany) 29. Lord David Anderson of Ipswich QC, Crossbench, United Kingdom 30. Barry Andrews, Renew Europe, European Parliament (Ireland) 31. Chris Andrews, Sinn Féin, Ireland 32. Eric Andrieu, S&D, European Parliament (France) 33.
    [Show full text]
  • LE19 - a Turning of the Tide? Report of Local Elections in Northern Ireland, 2019
    #LE19 - a turning of the tide? Report of local elections in Northern Ireland, 2019 Whitten, L. (2019). #LE19 - a turning of the tide? Report of local elections in Northern Ireland, 2019. Irish Political Studies, 35(1), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2019.1651294 Published in: Irish Political Studies Document Version: Peer reviewed version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright 2019 Political Studies Association of Ireland.. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected]. Download date:29. Sep. 2021 #LE19 – a turning of the tide? Report of Local Elections in Northern Ireland, 2019 Lisa Claire Whitten1 Queen’s University Belfast Abstract Otherwise routine local elections in Northern Ireland on 2 May 2019 were bestowed unusual significance by exceptional circumstance.
    [Show full text]
  • Representativeness of the European Social Partner Organisations: Education
    Representativeness of the European social partner organisations: Education Objectives of study Economic background National level of interest representation European level of interest representation Commentary References Annex: List of abbreviations This report is available in electronic format only. Wyattville Road, Loughlinstown, Dublin 18, Ireland. - Tel: (+353 1) 204 31 00 - Fax: 282 42 09 / 282 64 56 e-mail: [email protected] - website: www.eurofound.europa.eu This study sets out to provide the necessary information for establishing and assisting sectoral social dialogue in the education sector. The report has three main parts: a summary of the sector’s economic background; an analysis of the social partner organisations in all EU Member States, with special emphasis on their membership, their role in collective bargaining/employment regulation and public policy, and their national and European affiliations; and an analysis of the relevant European organisations, in particular their membership composition and their capacity to negotiate. The aim of the EIRO series of representativeness studies is to identify the relevant national and supranational social partner organisations in the field of industrial relations in selected sectors. The impetus for these studies arises from the goal of the European Commission to recognise the representative social partner organisations to be consulted under the EC Treaty provisions. Hence, this study is designed to provide the basic information required to establish and evaluate sectoral social dialogue. Objectives of study The aim of this representativeness study is to identify the relevant national and supranational associational actors – that is the trade unions and employer associations – in the field of industrial relations in the education sector, and to show how these actors relate to the sector’s European interest associations of labour and business.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenger Party List
    Appendix List of Challenger Parties Operationalization of Challenger Parties A party is considered a challenger party if in any given year it has not been a member of a central government after 1930. A party is considered a dominant party if in any given year it has been part of a central government after 1930. Only parties with ministers in cabinet are considered to be members of a central government. A party ceases to be a challenger party once it enters central government (in the election immediately preceding entry into office, it is classified as a challenger party). Participation in a national war/crisis cabinets and national unity governments (e.g., Communists in France’s provisional government) does not in itself qualify a party as a dominant party. A dominant party will continue to be considered a dominant party after merging with a challenger party, but a party will be considered a challenger party if it splits from a dominant party. Using this definition, the following parties were challenger parties in Western Europe in the period under investigation (1950–2017). The parties that became dominant parties during the period are indicated with an asterisk. Last election in dataset Country Party Party name (as abbreviation challenger party) Austria ALÖ Alternative List Austria 1983 DU The Independents—Lugner’s List 1999 FPÖ Freedom Party of Austria 1983 * Fritz The Citizens’ Forum Austria 2008 Grüne The Greens—The Green Alternative 2017 LiF Liberal Forum 2008 Martin Hans-Peter Martin’s List 2006 Nein No—Citizens’ Initiative against
    [Show full text]
  • The Struggle for a Left Praxis in Northern Ireland
    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Spring 2011 Sandino Socialists, Flagwaving Comrades, Red Rabblerousers: The trS uggle for a Left rP axis in Northern Ireland Benny Witkovsky SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the Civic and Community Engagement Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Politics and Social Change Commons Recommended Citation Witkovsky, Benny, "Sandino Socialists, Flagwaving Comrades, Red Rabblerousers: The trS uggle for a Left rP axis in Northern Ireland" (2011). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 1095. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/1095 This Unpublished Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Witkovsky 1 SANDINO SOCIALISTS, FLAG­WAVING COMRADES, RED RABBLE­ROUSERS: THE STRUGGLE FOR A LEFT PRAXIS IN NORTHERN IRELAND By Benny Witkovsky SIT: Transformation of Social and Political Conflict Academic Director: Aeveen Kerrisk Project Advisor: Bill Rolston, University of Ulster School of Sociology and Applied Social Studies, Transitional Justice Institute Spring 2011 Witkovsky 2 ABSTRACT This paper is the outcome of three weeks of research on Left politics in Northern Ireland. Taking the 2011 Assembly Elections as my focal point, I conducted a number of interviews with candidates and supporters, attended meetings and rallies, and participated in neighborhood canvasses.
    [Show full text]
  • Second-Order Success, First-Order Gains and the European Electoral Cycle
    Prepared for the 26th ECPR Summer School on Political Parties. The University of Nottingham (UK), School of Politics and International Relations, 12 September - 23 September, 2016. This is a preliminary draft that will be revised. Comments welcome. A Springboard to the Domestic Arena? Second-Order Success, First-Order Gains and the European Electoral Cycle Julia Schulte-Cloos 21 August 2016 [Word Count: 9250] Abstract European Parliament (EP) elections offer a distinct incentive structure to voters as there is no government formation at stake. Triggering protest and non-strategical votes, small and radical parties enjoy structural advantages in the supranational contest. While these patterns are well established in the literature, it remains puz- zling how success in the second-order arena impinges on the parties’ first-order trajectories. We lack a systematic understanding of the implications that the sec- ondary elections themselves have on party competition within the domestic arena. This paper posits that EP elections serve as a springboard for success in the national arena. The institution of the EP elections along with the different voting calculi therein has unanticipated consequences for domestic party competition. Drawing on a novel database encompassing the electoral results of all EU member states in national and EP elections since 1979, the temporal distance between these elections, and their position within the respective electoral cycles, I show that particularly populist radical right parties benefit from a spillover of European success to the na- tional arena. This effect is especially pronounced if the temporal distance between the national and the European election is close. The results suggest that the insti- tution of EP elections not only provides these parties with a permeable forum for politicising Europe and their antagonism towards further integration, but that the European campaign also bestows salience upon their nationalistic policy demands.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Engagement: Irish Republicanism, Memory Politics
    Critical Engagement Critical Engagement Irish republicanism, memory politics and policing Kevin Hearty LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY PRESS First published 2017 by Liverpool University Press 4 Cambridge Street Liverpool L69 7ZU Copyright © 2017 Kevin Hearty The right of Kevin Hearty to be identified as the author of this book has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication data A British Library CIP record is available print ISBN 978-1-78694-047-6 epdf ISBN 978-1-78694-828-1 Typeset by Carnegie Book Production, Lancaster Contents Acknowledgements vii List of Figures and Tables x List of Abbreviations xi Introduction 1 1 Understanding a Fraught Historical Relationship 25 2 Irish Republican Memory as Counter-Memory 55 3 Ideology and Policing 87 4 The Patriot Dead 121 5 Transition, ‘Never Again’ and ‘Moving On’ 149 6 The PSNI and ‘Community Policing’ 183 7 The PSNI and ‘Political Policing’ 217 Conclusion 249 References 263 Index 303 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements This book has evolved from my PhD thesis that was undertaken at the Transitional Justice Institute, University of Ulster (TJI). When I moved to the University of Warwick in early 2015 as a post-doc, my plans to develop the book came with me too. It represents the culmination of approximately five years of research, reading and (re)writing, during which I often found the mere thought of re-reading some of my work again nauseating; yet, with the encour- agement of many others, I persevered.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSC WP 2004-12 Which Path
    IISSSCC DDIISSCCUUSSSSIOONN PPAAPPEERR SSEERRIIEESS Which Path? Domestic Adaptation to Economic Internationalization in Ireland Dr Niamh Hardiman Niamh Hardiman held a Senior Research Fellowship from the Irish Research Council for Humanities and Social Sciences, 2003/4. She is Director of the Governance Research Programme at ISSC and a member of the Politics Department, UCD. This paper is produced as part of the Governance Research Programme at ISSC; however the views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of ISSC. The paper was written while the author held a Senior Research Fellowship from the Irish Research Council for Humanities and Social Sciences. All errors and omissions remain those of the author. Any comments, queries or suggestions relating to this paper are most welcome ISSC WP 2004/1 2 Which Path? Domestic Adaptation to Economic Internationalization in Ireland Abstract The growing integration of international markets raises the question of how, and to what extent, domestic political processes within states continue to matter. The thesis that markets force a ‘race to the bottom’ and the destruction of the welfare state has been discredited; there is continuing scope for diversity. Two patterns have commonly been identified. Continental European countries cluster together around politically coordinated adjustment strategies, while the liberal, Anglo-American countries adopt ever more market-driven responses. The new EU member states in central Europe and the Balkans have been expected to join the latter category. However, a third overlooked possibility exists – that market-oriented adjustment might continue to be strongly politically mediated, in line with expectations about the incentives facing small open economies, even in liberal economies.
    [Show full text]
  • Factsheet: Dáil Éireann (Irish House of Representatives)
    Directorate-General for the Presidency Directorate for Relations with National Parliaments Factsheet: Dáil Éireann (Irish House of Representatives) Leinster House in Dublin, the seat of the Irish Parliament 1. At a glance Ireland is a parliamentary democracy. The Irish Parliament, known as the Oireachtas, consists of the President and two Houses: Dáil Éireann (House of Representatives) and Seanad Éireann (the Senate). The Members of Dáil Éireann are elected at least once every five years by Irish citizens and British citizens resident in the Republic of Ireland aged 18 and over. The current Dáil was elected in February 2016 and consists of 158 deputies. For the 2016 Dáil elections, the Republic of Ireland was divided into 40 constituencies, each of which elected three to five Members using proportional representation and the single transferable vote system. The constitution confers primacy on Dáil Éireann as the directly elected House in the passage of legislation. Dáil Éireann is also the House from which the government is formed and to which it is responsible. Policy work mostly takes place in joint committees composed of Members of both Houses of of the Oireachtas. 2. Composition Current composition, following the general election on 26 February 2016 Party EP affiliation Number of seats Fine Gael 50 Fianna Fáil 44 Sinn Féin 23 Independents 18 Labour Party 7 Solidarity (Anti-Austerity Alliance) - Not affiliated 6 People before Profit Alliance Independents 4 Change 4 Social Democrats Not affiliated 3 Green Party 2 Aontú Not affiliated 1 158 Turnout: 65,1 % The next Dáil elections must take place in spring 2021 at the latest.
    [Show full text]
  • RTÉ/Behaviour & Attitudes 2016 General Election Exit Poll Report
    RTÉ/Behaviour & Attitudes 2016 General Election Exit Poll Report 26th February, 2016 PREPARED BY: Ian McShane & Martha Fanning J.7019 Introduction Introduction ● This report sets out the findings of an Exit Poll commissioned by RTÉ and carried out by Behaviour & Attitudes. The poll was conducted among a sample of 4,283 voters nationwide, interviewed immediately after they had voted in the General Election on Friday, 26th February, 2016. ● The sample was spread throughout all forty Dáil constituencies and undertaken at 223 polling stations. Interviews were conducted face-to-face with randomly selected individuals – throughout the hours of polling from 7am to 10pm in accordance with the 1992 Electoral Act (no interviews took place within 100 yards of a polling station). ● Three questionnaire versions were fielded. Each version included five common questions, along with six to eight questions unique to that particular version. ● The margin of error is estimated to be plus or minus 1.5 percentage points on the five common questions and plus or minus 2.6 percentage points on the questions unique to each of the three questionnaire versions. ● Extracts from the report may be quoted or published on condition that due acknowledgement is given to RTÉ and Behaviour & Attitudes. 3 CONFIDENTIAL Research Methodology ● A face-to-face Exit Poll was conducted among voters immediately after leaving polling stations on General Election day, Friday, 26th February, 2016. ● An effective sample of 4,283 voters was interviewed. ● The Poll was undertaken in all forty Dáil constituencies. ● 223 polling stations were sampled, distributed proportionate to Dáil seats within each constituency: No.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Developments, 2019
    01 Political Developments.qxp_Admin 68-1 26/02/2020 13:07 Page 1 Administration, vol. 68, no. 1 (2020), pp. 1–13 doi: 10.2478/admin-2020-0001 Political developments, 2019 David Hugh Moore Department of Political Science, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland European Parliament election On 24 May 2019 Ireland voted in the ninth European Parliament elections. As a result of Brexit, the European Parliament was reorganised and the number of MEPs was reduced from 751 to 705. The twenty-seven remaining UK seats were reallocated to other member states. Ireland received an additional two seats, bringing the country’s total number of seats up to thirteen. The same constituencies as in 2014 were used with only minor border changes. Two constituencies received an additional MEP. Dublin moved from a three-seat to a four-seat constituency while Ireland South went from a four- to a five-seat constituency. The Midlands North-West constituency stayed the same with four seats. Given that the UK had not actually left the EU when the elections were held, the two additional MEPs were ineligible to take their seats until the UK had officially left the EU. In order to be eligible to compete in European elections, a prospective candidate must fulfil one of the following criteria: be nominated by a registered political party; have declarations from sixty people willing to support their candidacy; or pay a deposit of €1,800. These requirements are deemed relatively simple to meet and as such helped contribute towards a record number of candidates running for MEP in the state.
    [Show full text]