DOCSLIB.ORG

Development Team

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Paper No: 05Principal ICT forInvestigator Libraries Director & Dr. Jagdish Arora, INFLIBNET Centre, Gandhinagar Module : 16Subject Open Coordinator Source Library Software and Applications Development Team PrincipalPaper Coordinator Investigator Dr. Jagdish Arora, Director & INFLIBNET Centre, Gandhinagar Subject Coordinator Content Writer Dr. Usha Mujoo Munshi, Librarian, Paper Coordinator Indian Institute of Public Administration Content Reviewer Dr. Parveen Babbar, Content Writer Deputy Librarian Jawaharlal Nehru University Dr. Usha Mujoo Munshi, Librarian, Content Reviewer Indian Institute of Public Administration PaperContent Coordinator Reviewer Open Source Library Software and Applications I. Objectives • To learn basics of Open Source Movement • Study the History of Open Source • Enumerate the Advantages and Disadvantages of Open Source Software • Open Source Software available for library automation • Open Source Library Applications II. Learning Outcomes After completion of this lesson, learners would be acquainted to the concept of open source software. They would learn about evolution of concept of open source and popular open source software that are available for automating libraries. III. Module Structure 1. Introduction 2. Open Source: Evaluation 2.1 History of Open Source 2.2 Open Source Platforms 2.3 Common OSS licenses 2.3.1 GNU General Public License (GPL) /Affero General Public License 2.3.2 Creative Commons 2.3.3 GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL)/ Artistic License 2.3.4 Berkley System Distribution License (BSD)/ Apache Software License/ MIT License/ NCSA License 2.3.5 OCLC Research Public License 3. Open Source Software 3.1 Open Source 3.1.1 Free Redistribution 3.1.2 Source Code 3.1.3 Derived Works 3.1.4 Integrity of The Author's Source Code 3.1.5 No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups and against the fields of endeavour 3.1.6 Distribution of License 3.1.7 License Must Not be Specific to be a Product 3.1.8 License Must Not Restrict Other Software 3.1.9 License Must Be Technology-Neutral 3.2 Advantages of Open Source Software 3.3 Disadvantages of Open Source Software 3.4 Some examples of general use popular Open Source Software's 4. Open Source Library Software (Integrated Library Systems) 4.1 Open Source Integrated Library Systems 4.1.1 Koha 4.1.2 Evergreen 4.1.3 OpenBiblio 4.1.4 NewGenLib (NGL) 4.1.5 SOPAC (Social Online Public Access Catalog) 5. Digital/Electronic Library Softwares 5.1 Dienest 5.2 DSpace 5.3 EPrints 5.4 Fedora 5.5 Greenstone 5.6 Invenio 6. Some important popular Library Management Applications 6.1 ATutor 6.2 CORAL 6.3 CUFTS 6.4 Drupal 6.5 GODOT 6.6 Joomla 6.7 Manhattan 6.8 Moodle 7. Summary 8. References 1. Introduction Open Source Software (OSS), term was coined by Eric Raymond, it is the software for which the source code is freely and publicly available, though the specific licensing agreements vary as to what one is allowed to do with that code. Open source software (OSS) has gained importance worldwide and in the last few years open source has triggered a vast volume of research and has entered the mainstream software market, with the adoption of packages such as Linux (operating system), mySQL (relational database), PHP, Perl, Python (scripting and programming languages), Apache Web Server and the Zope content management system and many more. However the Free software [FS], term was given by Richard Stallman in 1984, is the software which can be obtained at zero cost i.e. software which gives the user certain freedoms. FS provides only executable file to the end user, through public domain and end user is free to use that executable software in any way, but the user is not free to modify that software. Similarly the alternative term Free/Libre and Open Source Software (FLOSS) refers to software licenses which give users four essential ‘freedoms. These include running the program for any purpose, studying the workings of the program, and modify the program to suit specific needs. One can also redistribute copies of the program at no charge or for a fee, and finally to improve the program, and release the improved, modified version. 2. Open Source: Evaluation 2.1 History of Open Source The open source movement started in the 1980s with Richard Stallman who resigned from MIT founded GNU project. Unix is an operating system, whose functionality, he wanted to copy and build upon, but it required community effort. Wanting it to be a free software, he created a different kind of copyright licence, which he termed “copyleft”. “ Milestones in the history of open source software are: • 1983 - Richard Stallman formed GNU project; • 1985 - Creation of Free Software Foundation; • 1991 - Development of Linux kernel by Linus Torvalds; • 1998 - Open Source Initiative (OSI) formed by Eric Raymond. 2.2 Open Source Platforms a. Open Source Initiative [http://opensource.org/]- The Open Source Initiative (OSI) is a non-profit corporation with global scope formed to educate about and advocate for the benefits of open source and to build bridges among different constituencies in the open source community. b. SourceForge [http://sourceforge.net/ ] - SourceForge is an Open Source community resource dedicated to helping open source projects, be as successful as possible. It thrives on community collaboration to help create a premiere resource for open source software development and distribution. 2.3 Common OSS licenses Some of the most common licenses used for Open Source are: 2.3.1 GNU General Public License (GPL) /Affero General Public License- GNU is the most common of OSS licenses, the GPL implements a concept known as “copyleft” that attempts to negate copyright for the purposes of collaborative software development. Under the GPL license, the code for a GPL-licensed application can be used anywhere in any situation; it can be distributed to anyone as long as the code is included and the GPL license is retained; and anyone can create a derivative work from the code and redistribute it, as long as the resulting code is made available and also licensed under the GPL. The Affero General Public License is almost identical to the GPL but includes additional provisions for network access. 2.3.2 Creative Commons - Creative Commons licensing is similar to that of the GPL, but is not designed around software. The Creative Commons license was originally designed for other creative works such as music and film, though it is increasingly utilized within software projects. 2.3.3 GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL)/ Artistic License- LGPL is normally used to designate source code that can be used by applications for which a charge is levied, so that this code can be used in commercial products, hence “lesser”. The Artistic License is similar and also attempts to mitigate the fear of using code for commercial purposes. 2.3.4 Berkley System Distribution License (BSD)/ Apache Software License/ MIT License/ NCSA License - The BSD license is basis for many other licenses, including Apache Software License/ MIT License/ NCSA License. It is mainly concerned that the copyright of the code be recognized as belonging to the creators and that this copyright be promulgated to applications built with the source code. The BSD license, like almost all OSS licenses, also specifies that the copyright holder is not liable for the consequences of using the source code. 2.3.5 OCLC Research Public License - The OCLC license ensures that modifications are reported back to OCLC if the intent is to redistribute the changes externally. 3. Open Source Software Open source software is where the source code of programs is made freely available for anyone to change and distribute, provided they abide by the accompanying licence. This differs from closed source or propriety software which may only be obtained by some form of payment, either by purchase or by “leasing”. The difference between open and closed source can be characterised by the word freedom: users of open source software have the freedom to alter the source code while users of closed source software do not. Open Source Proprietary Provides support Commercial Open Yearly License + Yearly and legal Source Maintenance Maintenance indemnification Community Open Freeware or Normally no Free Source Shareware formal support Fig.1: Open Source is a licensing or business model 3.1 Open Source Open source is the access to the source code and its distribution terms must comply with the following criteria: 3.1.1 Free Redistribution: By free distribution it is meant that the license shall not restrict any party from selling or giving away the software as a component of an aggregate software distribution containing programs from several different sources. Royalty or any other kind of fees cannot be charged for the sale of such software. 3.1.2 Source Code: The open source software includes the source code. If the source code is not provided the downloading via the Internet without charge must be allowed in that case. The source code must be preferred form in which a programmer would modify the program. 3.1.3 Derived Works: The modifications and derived works must be allowed under the same terms as the license of the original software. 3.1.4 Integrity of The Author's Source Code: The license may restrict source- code from being distributed in modified form with different name and version only if the license allows the distribution of "patch files" with the source code for the purpose of modifying the program at build time. 3.1.5 No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups and against the fields of endeavour. 3.1.6 Distribution of License: The rights attached to the program must apply to all, to whom the program is redistributed without the need for execution of an additional license.
Recommended publications
  • Major Open Source ILS Products

    Major Open Source ILS Products

    Chapter 3 Major Open Source ILS Products t least four open source ILS products are available system, called Catalist, which was not compliant with the today: Koha, Evergreen, and OPALS. (see table looming Y2K issue. Rather than purchase a commercial A4). While there may be some additional products, system, HLT contracted with a consulting company named these four have emerged as the most widely implemented Katipo Communications to develop a new Web-based sys- and serve as good examples of the current state of the tem. They named this new system Koha, the Maori word art of the open source ILS. While each of these products for gift or donation, and released it as open source, allow- bears a great deal of similarity in approach, they also dif- ing libraries anywhere to use and help develop and sup- fer in features and functionality and in their appeal to port the software. The HLT libraries began using Koha on different types of libraries This section provides detailed January 1, 2000. information regarding each of these systems. A fairly quiet period followed the initial release of Koha, with a few individuals and libraries picking up on the system. No groundswell of interest resulted right away. The initial version of Koha was quite adequate for History and Background three libraries of HLT that together served a commu- Koha nity of about 30,000 residents with a collection of about 80,000 volumes. At that point, Koha did not have some Koha claims the status of being the first open source of the features considered mandatory for most libraries— November/December 2008 November/December library automation system.
  • Candidate Resume

    Candidate Resume

    Flat No-a/303, Dharti Park, Behind Shriniwas , Palghar Thane MH 401501 India P : +91 9321883949 E : [email protected] W : www.hawkcl.com Hawk ID # 33574 IT / System Analyst Residential Country : India Nationality : India Resume Title : System Analyst Notice Period : 1 Days EDUCATION Qualification Institute / College /University Year Country B E / B Tech JNTU 2007 India CAREER SUMMARY From Month/ To Month/ Position Employer Country Year Year System Analyst Reputed Company 07/2010 / Software Verus Solutions 10/2007 07/2010 Developer Private Ltd ADDITIONAL CERTIFICATE AND TECHNICAL QUALIFICATION Name Of The Course Course Date Valid Upto Name Of Organisation Current Salary Expected Salary (Monthly In USD): Not Mention (Monthly In USD): Not Mention Additional Skills : Professional Summary • Eight years of experience in design, development, deployment and maintenance of enterprise web applications in ERP, Utility and Marketing domains. • Expertise in Client/ Server and application development using Java, J2ee technologies. • Experienced in leading and mentoring teams with 3-5 members. • Strong knowledge on Object Oriented Programming. • Expertise in web application development using frameworks like Struts , Spring and Hibernate. • Excellent Knowledge of MVC Architecture. • Have worked on application servers like Jboss and Tomcat. • Have worked on build and deploy tools like Ant and Maven. • Have worked on continuous integration tools like Hudson (aka Jenkins). • Have worked on consuming the SOAP web services using Apache Axis API. • Good understanding of Rest Services (RestEasy). • Working knowledge on relational databases like Oracle 10g and Postgresql 8. • Pro-active, highly motivated, results oriented and leadership skills with great team ethics. Technical Expertise • Programming Languages : Java 5/6/7.
  • The Use and Application of Open Source Integrated Library System in Academic Libraries in Nigeria: Koha Example

    The Use and Application of Open Source Integrated Library System in Academic Libraries in Nigeria: Koha Example

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2015 The seU and Application of Open Source Integrated Library System in Academic Libraries in Nigeria: Koha Example Emeka C. Uzomba Mr. Federal University,Oye-Ekiti, Ekiti State, [email protected] OLUWATOFUNMI JESUDUNNI OYEBOLA Mrs. Federal University Oye-Ekiti, Nigeria, [email protected] ANTHONY CHUKWUMA IZUCHUKWU Mr. University of Nigeria, Nsukka, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac Part of the Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, and the Library and Information Science Commons Uzomba, Emeka C. Mr.; OYEBOLA, OLUWATOFUNMI JESUDUNNI Mrs.; and IZUCHUKWU, ANTHONY CHUKWUMA Mr., "The sU e and Application of Open Source Integrated Library System in Academic Libraries in Nigeria: Koha Example" (2015). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1250. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1250 THE USE AND APPLICATION OF OPEN SOURCE INTEGRATED LIBRARY SYSTEM IN ACADEMIC LIBRARIES IN NIGERIA: KOHA EXAMPLE BY EMEKA CHRISTIAN UZOMBA Federal University Oye-Ekiti (Corresponding Author) Phone: +2348036996747 P.M.B.2273 Oye-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria. [email protected] , [email protected] , OLUWATOFUNMI JESUDUNNI OYEBOLA Federal University Oye-Ekiti (Co-Author) Phone: +2348030617819 P.M.B.2273 Oye-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria. [email protected] , [email protected] ANTHONY CHUKWUMA IZUCHUKWU Department of Library and Information Science, University of Nigeria, Nsukka (Co-Author) Phone: +2348067699821 [email protected] ABSTRACT This study examined the use of open source integrated library system in academic libraries in Nigeria, with the aim of highlighting the capabilities and potentials of open source software (Koha) and its practical importance to academic libraries across the globe.
  • Open Source Library Management System Software: a Review

    Open Source Library Management System Software: a Review

    World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Computer and Systems Engineering Vol:5, No:5, 2011 Open Source Library Management System Software: A Review Sangsuree Vasupongayya, Kittisak Keawneam, Kittipong Sengloilaun, Patt Emmawat materials), cataloging (i.e., classifying and indexing of Abstract—Library management systems are commonly used in materials), circulation (i.e., lending and receiving of materials) all educational related institutes. Many commercial products are and serials management (i.e., managing magazine and available. However, many institutions may not be able to afford the newspaper information. The second component is an cost of using commercial products. Therefore, an alternative solution interlibrary load management system. Because a library may in such situations would be open source software. This paper is focusing on reviewing open source library management system not have a hold of all materials required, an interlibrary loan is packages currently available. The review will focus on the abilities to a way for its patron to request such materials from other perform four basic components which are traditional services, libraries. The last component is a system to manage electronic interlibrary load management, managing electronic materials and materials and digital media. basic common management system such as security, alert system and In addition to the above three main components, a library statistical reports. In addition, environment, basic requirement and management system software package must contain a supporting aspects of each open source package are also mentioned. commonly shared components such as a user account management feature, a security component, an alert system Keywords— open source, library management, review.
  • Vol.22- No.2 (Apr-June, 2015)

    Vol.22- No.2 (Apr-June, 2015)

    INFLIBNET NEWSLETTER ISSN : 0971- 9849 Vol. 22, No.2 (April to June 2015) Mentions Openness metrics Measuring Research Diversity Citations Social Media PLOS work Time scholarly Indicators Sources filters Social Networks Social Blogs & Media Blogs rapid Analytics significant Speed CapturesAltmetricstools communication articles Scientific Broadness peer-reviewImpact Article Altmetrics: Measuring the Broader Impact of Scientific Research Pallab Pradhan, Scientist-B (LS) IndCat e-PG Pathshala http://indcat.inflibnet.ac.in/ http://epgp.inflibnet.ac.in/ Editorial Board SOUL Helpline INFLIBNET’s Institutional Repositary Tel. : +91-79-23268300 http://ir.inflibnet.ac.in/ Dr. Jagdish Arora VIDWAN N-LIST (E-resources for College) Mrs. Roma Asnani http://vidwan.inflibnet.ac.in/ http://nilst.inflibnet.ac.in/ Mr. Mohit Kumar UGC-INFONET Digital Library Consortium Open Journal Access System (OJAS) http://www.inflibnet.ac.in/econ/ http://www.inflibnet.ac.in/ojs/ Shodhganga Integrated e-content Portal http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/ http://content.inflibnet.ac.in/ Page No. Contents 1. From Director's Desk 3. Training Programme on SOUL 2.0, INFLIBNET Centre, Gandhinagar 3. User Awareness Programmes on Access to E-resources under N-LIST One-day User Awareness Programme on Access to E-resources under N-LIST, Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada University, Nanded, Maharashtra, 22nd May, 2015 4. National Workshops and Specialized Training Programme Two-day Workshop on Ethical Issues & Use of Anti-Plagiarism for Research Integrity, INFLIBNET Centre, Gandhinagar,
  • Eight Things You Should Know About Open Source Integrated Library Systems

    Eight Things You Should Know About Open Source Integrated Library Systems

    1 Eight Things you should Know about Open Source Integrated Library Systems. Vimal Kumar V. 1 and Thomas Abraham 2 1 Asst. Librarian Asian School of Business Technopark, Trivandrum-695581 [email protected] 2 Open Knowledge Society [email protected] Abstract: Open source library management systems are free alternative to costly commercial library systems. It helps to automate library functions and give a tremendous savings on library automation expenses. User’s participation in all stages of software project ensures the development of the features that the library really wants. Lack of awareness and knowledge in open source technology among library professionals restrict wide adoption of open source library management system. This article gives an insight into the use and maintenance of open source library management systems. Key words: open source, library management system, library automation Introduction investment. Principles and practices of open source software are very similar to the principles and practices of modern librarianship. Both value free and equal access to data, Open source is becoming a trend setter in libraries. Lots of information and knowledge. Both strive to promote human open source softwares are available for various automation understanding and to make our lives better. Both make effort purposes in libraries. Open source digital library and to improve society as a whole [1]. institutional repository softwares are very popular among librarians. But such softwares are mainly used to preserve and dis seminate scholarly literature and other digital content. What is open source ILS? Digital libraries and institutional repositories have relevance only in big library systems. Circulation, cataloging, An integrated library system, or ILS, is an enterprise resource acquisition and serial control are common basic functions in planning system for a library.
  • Investing in Health R&D: Where We Are, What Limits Us, and How to Make

    Investing in Health R&D: Where We Are, What Limits Us, and How to Make

    Analysis BMJ Glob Health: first published as 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001047 on 4 March 2019. Downloaded from Investing in health R&D: where we are, what limits us, and how to make progress in Africa Victoria Simpkin,1 Evelyn Namubiru-Mwaura,2 Lorcan Clarke, 1 Elias Mossialos1,3 To cite: Simpkin V, ABSTRACT Summary box Namubiru-Mwaura E, Clarke L, Global research and development (R&D) pipelines for et al. Investing in health R&D: diseases that disproportionately affect African countries ► Health science research, funding and research ca- where we are, what limits us, appear to be inadequate, with governments struggling and how to make progress pacity are insufficient to address Africa’s current to prioritise investment in R&D. This article provides in Africa. BMJ Glob Health unmet health needs, and there are ambitious coun- insights into the sources of investment in health science 2019;4:e001047. doi:10.1136/ try-set targets and frameworks for progress still to research, available research capacity and level of bmjgh-2018-001047 be met over the coming decade. research output in Africa. The African region comprises ► There are substantial disparities in within-continent 15% of the world’s population, yet only accounted for Handling editor Seye Abimbola research and development (R&D) investment; esti- 1.1% of global investments in R&D in 2016. There were mates from 2016 indicated South Africa, Egypt and ► Additional material is substantial disparities within the continent, with Egypt, Nigeria contributed almost two-thirds of the total do- published online only. To view Nigeria and South Africa contributing 65.7% of the total please visit the journal online mestic spending on R&D in Africa.
  • Population Density by Local Authorities,1970 3

    Population Density by Local Authorities,1970 3

    Migrationin WestAfrica a 1g DemographicAspects Public Disclosure Authorized K. C. Zachariah and Julien Cond6 Public Disclosure Authorized , X / NK I X N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~V Public Disclosure Authorized f - i X-X Public Disclosure Authorized N ,1~~~~~1 A Joint World Bank-QEODStudy Migration in West Africa Demographic Aspects A Joint World Bank-OECD Study With the assistance of Bonnie Lou Newlon and contributions by Chike S. Okoye M. L. Srivastava N. K. Nair Eugene K. Campbell Kenneth Swindell Remy Clairin Michele Fieloux K. C. Zachariah and Julien Conde Migration in West Africa Demographic Aspects Published for the World Bank Oxford University Press Oxford University Press NEW YORK OXFORD LONDON GLASGOW TORONTO MELBR(OURNEWELLINGTON HONG KONG TOKYO KUALA LUMPUR SINGAPORE JAKARTA DELHI BOMBAY CALCUTTA MADRAS KARACHI NAIROBI DAR ES SALAAM CAPE TOWN © 1981 by the InternationalBank for Reconstructionand Development/ The WorldBank 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington,D.C. 20433 U.S.A. All rights reserved.No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system,or transmitted in any form or by any means,electronic, mechanical, photocopying,recording, or otherwise,without the prior permissionof Oxford UniversityPress. Manufactured in the United Statesof America. The viewsand interpretationsin this book are the authors' and should not be attributed to the OECD or the World Bank, to their affiliatedorganizations, or to any individual acting in their behalf. The maps have been prepared for the convenienceof readers of this book;the denominationsused and the boundaries showndo not imply, on the part of the OECD, the World Bank, and their affiliates,any judgment on the legal status of any territory or any endorsementor acceptance of such boundaries.
  • IS OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE an IMPENDING THREAT to CUSTOMIZE SOFTWARE in the FIELD of LIBRARY AUTOMATION? —Nilaranjan Barik and Rekha Singh

    IS OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE an IMPENDING THREAT to CUSTOMIZE SOFTWARE in the FIELD of LIBRARY AUTOMATION? —Nilaranjan Barik and Rekha Singh

    552 | Transformation of Knowledge Resource Centers in Collaborative Era IS OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE AN IMPENDING THREAT TO CUSTOMIZE SOFTWARE IN THE FIELD OF LIBRARY AUTOMATION? —Nilaranjan Barik and Rekha Singh Abstract Emergence of Open Source Software is a new ray of hope in the field of library automation. It can be a gift to those libraries that have financial constraints to procure customized software to automate their libraries as per the changing demand of users and library environment. This paper discusses the concept of OSS, how it differs from commercial software which is widely available. Also discusses why and how OSS can be a threat for customized software, particularly in the area of library automation. Keywords OSS, NPL, PHP, GNU-GPL Introduction The popularity of open source software has captured the imagination of developers, library information professionals and computing enthusiasts across the globe. Open source software are available free of cost and the users have freedom to use, contribute the software without any restriction. Open source software is beginning to have a long term effect on libraries. Smaller and medium size libraries, which can not afford to buy commercial software due to high price for library automation, now have the option to explore open source library management software. The Linux operating system, Apache web server, My SQL database management system Editor: Veer & Kalbande | 553 and PHP scripting language are leading examples of freely available software that are used by LIS professionals to explore open source library management software in the field of library automation. Recently dozen of active OSS projects are engaged in development of library management systems around the world.
  • L'architecture Macro De La Plateforme

    L'architecture Macro De La Plateforme

    THE USE OF THE SOFTWARE INVENIO TO BUILD THE DIGITAL LIBRARY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN CÔTE D’IVOIRE Copyright UVCI SUMMARY I GENERAL PRESENTATION 1. History of the digital library 2. Choice of the software INVENIO 3. Definition of the digital library and collections 4. Activities II PARTNERS 1. Ministry for higher education and scientific research 2. Universities and research institutions in Côte d’Ivoire 3. RITER//WACREN III PROSPECTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Copyright UVCI GENERAL PRESENTATION 1. History of the digital library 2002 : integration of the university (Cocody) in the project Datad 2005 : the physical catalogue of thesis and dissertations published by Professor LY- BAKAYOKO Ramata ; 2007-2008 : workshops and individual trainings to create the database with the software WINISIS in the public universities and Higher school libraries (ministry’s direction of scientific information…) 2011 : political crisis in Côte d’Ivoire with a lot of destruction and lost of some important collections and materials in the universities libraries closed during 2 years or more (government decision) 2011 : participation to the 3rd school of Digital libraries in science, use of the software INVENIO - Organized by CERN and UNESCO, Dakar (Senegal) Copyright UVCI GENERAL PRESENTATION 1. History of the digital library May 2012 : six librarians and IT engineers from Mali, Burkina Faso, Maroc, Senegal, Côte d’Ivoire at CERN for a follow-up of the workshop in Dakar (organized by CERN and UNESCO) in Geneva (Switzerland) 2012-2013 : Workshops organized by the (Direction of Scientific Information) for the use of the software DSPACE and PMB with the partnership of AUA and AUF April 2014 : workshop for the selection of the software INVENIO to implement the project of building a digital library in a global project named PADTICE for UNESCO-UEMOA with the collaboration of the LIS school EBAD Copyright UVCI GENERAL PRESENTATION 1.
  • A Comparative Study of Tools Used in Building Open Source and Proprietary Integrated Library Systems

    A Comparative Study of Tools Used in Building Open Source and Proprietary Integrated Library Systems

    International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security (IJCSIS), Vol. 17, No. 3, March 2019 A Comparative Study of Tools used in Building Open Source and Proprietary Integrated Library Systems Light Mawumenyo Kwami 1, Joseph Kobina Panford 2, James Ben Hayfron-Acquah3 1 Department of Computer Science, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana 1 [email protected] 2Department of Computer Science, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana [email protected] 3Department of Computer Science, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana [email protected] Abstract—Open source Integrated Library System (ILS) may cataloguing (classifying and indexing items), circulation (charging be view by many as a comprehensive occurrence that have the and discharging of items), serials (tracing periodical items), the potential of providing the library industry with substitute and OPAC (public interface for End Users) ([1]. aggressive way of doing business. Research done so far has The ILS database assigns a unique ID to each patron and item in tackled the history and business aspect of the open source library order to trace every activity [46]. Libraries use ILS’s for ordering and occurrence and only few have researched its technical aspect. acquiring, receiving and invoicing, cataloguing, circulating, tracking This research explores the reason behind the poor level of and shelving items. The University of Texas begun mechanizing their adoption of open source LMSs in Ghana, and whether it is due to circulation module using the punch card system. The punch card poor awareness about the concept or the technical inadequacies system permitted for more effectual way of tracking of materials on in the open source tools. The research was done in two major loan, but other library service were far from being integrated.
  • ISSN: 2278-6236 Newgenlib: OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE's in INDIAN

    ISSN: 2278-6236 Newgenlib: OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE's in INDIAN

    International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences ISSN: 2278-6236 NewGenLib: OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE’S IN INDIAN LIBRARIES Kirti Singh* Abstract: Open system is not known for being easy to use. Usability could be one of the most effective changes to make in open source system. NenGenLib is an integrated library management system developed by various solutions pvt.ltd. Domain expertise is provided by Kesavan .In this paper highlights the features of NewGenLib open source software, the first of its kind developed in India. Discuss the issues like History of OSS, their Definition, selection criteria of library automation software; factors pushing the use of OSS; the features of NewGenLib open source software and evaluation of these in the line of advantages and disadvantages. Keywords: NewGenLib, Library automation, Open Source, Software *Librarian, SSDWomens Institute of Technology, Bathinda Vol. 1 | No. 6 | December 2012 www.garph.co.uk IJARMSS | 173 International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences ISSN: 2278-6236 1. INTRODUCTION: The free software movement was launched in 1983. In 1998, a group of individuals advocated that the term free software be replaced by open source software (OSS) as an expression which is less ambiguous and more comfortable for the corporate world. Software developers may want to publish their software with an open source license, so that anybody may also develop the same software or understand how it works. Open source software generally allows anyone to make a new version of the software, port it to new operating systems and processor architectures, share it with others or market it.