DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Legal Services Bill

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

HOUSE OF COMMONS HOUSE OF LORDS Joint Committee on the Draft Legal Services Bill Session 2005–06 Draft Legal Services Bill Volume II: Evidence Ordered to be printed 13 July 2006 and published 3 August 2006 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords and the House of Commons London : The Stationery Office Limited £26.50 HC 1154-II HL Paper 232-II CONTENTS ORAL EVIDENCE Page Office of Fair Trading (OFT) Written evidence (Ev 43) 1 Oral evidence, 6 June 2006 4 Law Society of England and Wales Written evidence Law Society (Ev 03) 14 Oral evidence, 8 June 2006 19 Supplementary written evidence Law Society (Ev 03a) 26 Further supplementary written evidence Law Society (Ev 03b) 26 Further supplementary written evidence Law Society (Ev 03c) 34 Further supplementary written evidence Law Society (Ev 03d) 38 Further supplementary written evidence Law Society (Ev 03e) 41 Further Supplementary written evidence Law Society (Ev 03f) 42 General Council for the Bar of England and Wales Written evidence Bar Council (Ev 01) 43 Oral evidence, 8 June 2006 55 Supplementary written evidence Bar Council (Ev 01a) 63 Further supplementary written evidence Bar Council (Ev 01b) 65 Further supplementary written evidence Bar Council (Ev 01c) 67 Further supplementary written evidence Bar Council (Ev 01d) 70 Further supplementary written evidence Bar Council (Ev 01e) 74 Further supplementary written evidence Bar Council (Ev 01f) 76 National Consumer Council, Which?, Citizens Advice Written evidence National Consumer Council (Ev 04) 78 Written evidence Which? (Ev 21) 81 Oral evidence, 12 June 2006 84 Sir David Clementi Oral evidence, 12 June 2006 93 Written evidence Sir David Clementi (Ev 72) 102 Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC), Institute of Legal Executives (ILEX), Institute of Trade Mark Attorneys (ITMA), Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA) Written evidence Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC) (Ev 08) 106 Written evidence Institute of Legal Executives (ILEX) (Ev 41) 111 Written evidence Institute of Trade Mark Attorneys (ITMA) and Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys (CIPA) (Ev 12) 115 Oral evidence, 15 June 2006 121 Supplementary written evidence Legal Executives (ILEX) (Ev 41a) 127 Legal Services Commission and Legal Aid Practitioners Group (LAPG) Written evidence Legal Services Commission (Ev 75) 129 Written evidence Legal Aid Practitioners Group (LAPG) (Ev 02) 131 Oral evidence, 15 June 2006 133 Legal Action Group (LAG) and Law Centres Federation Written evidence Legal Action Group (LAG) (Ev 40) 139 Written evidence Law Centres Federation (Ev 19) 142 Oral evidence, 15 June 2006 143 Lord Chief Justice and Master of the Rolls Oral evidence, 19 June 2006 149 Legal Services Ombudsman for England and Wales and Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), Written evidence Legal Services Ombudsman (Ev 20) 156 Written evidence Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) (Ev 18) 160 Oral evidence, 19 June 2006 162 Supplementary written evidence Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) (Ev 18a) 167 Supplementary written evidence Legal Services Ombudsman (Ev 20a) 169 Law Society Consumer Complaints Board and Law Society Regulation Board Written evidence Law Society Consumer Complaints Board (Ev 68) 171 Written evidence Law Society Regulation Board (Ev 67) 174 Oral evidence, 19 June 2006 179 Supplementary written evidence Law Society Regulation Board (Ev 67a) 183 Bar Standards Board Written evidence (Ev 56) 184 Oral evidence, 19 June 2006 193 Supplementary written evidence (Ev 56d) 197 Co-operative Legal Services, AA Legal Services and Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) Written evidence Co-operative Legal Services (Ev 66) 199 Written evidence Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) (Ev 65) 202 Oral evidence, 22 June 2006 205 Federation of Small Businesses, City of London Lawyers (CLLS), Solicitors Sole Practitioners Group (SSPG) and Bar Sole Practitioners Group Written evidence City of London Law Society (Ev 42) 210 Written evidence Solicitors Sole Practitioners Group (SSPG) (Ev 25) 215 Oral evidence, 22 June 2006 220 Written evidence Bar Sole Practitioners Group (Ev 73) 229 Bridget Prentice MP, Parliamentary Under Secretary of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs Oral evidence, 26 June 2006 231 Written evidence (Ev 76) 246 Supplementary written evidence (Ev 76a) 256 WRITTEN EVIDENCE Page Addleshaw Goddard LLP (Ev 81) 215 Advice Services Alliance (Ev 29) 259 Allen and Overy (Ev 34) 261 Amicus (Ev 26) 262 Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) (Ev 28) 265 Dr Kamlesh Bahl CBE (Ev 35) Simon Baker (Ev 80) 271 Berrymans Lace Mawer (Ev 82) 276 Bird and Bird (Ev 23) 214 British and Irish Ombudsman Association (BIOA) (Ev 15) 278 British Printing Industries Federation (BPIF) (Ev 39) 279 Charles Russell LLP (Ev 49) 215 C S Caisley (Ev 05) 282 Clifford Chance (Ev 36) 283 Cobbetts LLP (Ev 59) 285 Complaints Against Solicitors, action for Independent Adjudication (CASIA) (Ev 33) 286 Sarah Cook (Ev 27) 288 Dr Bernhard Dombek (Ev 70) 289 Dechert LLP (Ev 44) 215 Eifion Edwards (Ev 17) 290 Epoq Group (Ev 45) 295 Fishburns (Ev 47) 297 Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer (Ev 24) 214 Hampshire Incorporated Law Society (Ev 54) 301 HIPS(97) (Ev 06) 301 Holman Fenwick & William (Ev 48) 215 JUSTICE (Ev 10) 302 John Kirkhope (Ev 30) 303 Law Society of Scotland (Ev 51) 303 Lovells (Ev 38) 214 Robin Makin (Ev 09) 304 Guy Mansfield QC (Ev 77) 314 Master of Faculties (Ev 11) 325 Mayer Browne, Rowe and Maw LLP (Ev 07) 326 Medical Protection Society (MPS) (Ev 32) 326 Mercer (Ev 61) 328 David Morgan (Ev 52) 329 Notaries Society (Ev 31) 331 Olswang (Ev 50) 333 Professional Negligence Lawyers’ Association (PNLA) (Ev 58) 333 PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) (Ev 46) 335 Resolution (Ev 55) 337 RMT (Ev 78) 342 Reform of Complaints Against Solicitors (ROCAS) (Ev 13) 343 Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) (Ev 53) 346 Slaughter and May (Ev 22) 214 Society of Legal Scholars (Ev 74) 346 Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (Ev 69) 348 Mr William Taylor (Ev 16) 350 TUC (Ev 57) 351 Mr David Wolfe (Ev 37) 354 Young Legal Aid Lawyers (YLAL) (Ev 60) 357 Evidence received by the Joint Committee but not printed can be inspected in the House of Lords Record Office (020-7219 2333), e-mail [email protected] 3435523001 Page Type [Ex 1] 31-07-06 10:23:55 Pag Table: LOENEW PPSysB Unit: 1PAG Minutes of Evidence TAKEN BEFORE THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON THE DRAFT LEGAL SERVICES BILL TUESDAY 6 JUNE 2006 Present Bach, L Mr David Burrowes Campbell of Alloway, L Michael Jabez Foster Henig, B Stephen Hesford Hunt of Wirral, L (Chairman) Mr David Kidney Neill of Bladen, L Emily Thornberry In Attendance: Mr Nigel Reeder,andMr Alasdair Wallace, members of the Draft Legal Services Bill Team. Memorandum by the Office of Fair Trading (Ev 43) 1. Introduction 1. The OYce of Fair Trading fully supports the Draft Legal Services Bill. In our view, the Draft Bill represents a significant opportunity to improve current arrangements for the regulation and delivery of legal services in England and Wales. The legal professions need reformto e nhance competition and improve choice for their clients and to ensure that consumers are properly protected when things go wrong. Regulatory arrangements that allow lawyers freedom to develop new, better and more eYcient ways of supplying legal and other services are likely to serve the needs of consumers in England and Wales better and to improve the capacity of lawyers and other professionals to better compete in markets that are increasingly international. We welcome this opportunity to contribute to scrutiny of the Draft Bill by the Joint Committee. OFT gave oral evidence to the Joint Committee on 6 June 2006. OFT involvement 2. OFT has been actively involved in advocating pro-competitive reform of the legal professions for some years. In March 2001, OFT’s report Competition in professions challenged a number of restrictions on the provision of legal services both in professional rules and in statute.1 A progress report in April 20022 noted some reform of anticompetitive rules by professional bodies but noted that significant restrictions remained in particular with regard to business structure.3 Restrictions that remain to be addressed are: — the prohibition on partnership between barristers and between barristers and other professionals, including other lawyers; — the prohibition on sharing of fees between solicitors and other professionals; — the prohibition on solicitors in employment to non-solicitors providing services to third party clients; and — the prohibition on barristers providing litigation services to third parties. 3. An important principle of our work in this area is that it is not for us to dictate how lawyers should or should not supply services. The manner in which goods and services are supplied is generally best determined by unfettered competition between suppliers for the custom of consumers. The freedom to compete that results can only benefit suppliers and consumers. Where rules are necessary, for example to protect vulnerable consumers, it will be important to ensure that these are no more restrictive than necessary to meet that objective. This cannot be guaranteed where the task of making professional rules is the sole preserve of the professional bodies which represent the interests of suppliers, and in the absence of eVective independent oversight. 1 OFT 328 available on our website at www.oft.gov.uk 2 OFT 385 available on our website at www.oft.gov.uk 3 OFT 722 available on our website at www.oft.gov.uk 3435523001 Page Type [E] 31-07-06 10:23:55 Pag Table: LOENEW PPSysB Unit: 1PAG 2 joint committee on the draft legal services bill: evidence 6 June 2006 Key Proposals in the draft Bill 4. Provisions in the Draft Bill fall into three main areas: regulatory framework; alternative business structures; complaints handling.
Recommended publications
  • Moving Towards a Fairer Fee Policy: Report on Responses to Consultation

    Moving Towards a Fairer Fee Policy: Report on Responses to Consultation

    Moving towards a fairer fee policy Report on responses to consultation paper 19 Table of contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 2 Responses to the questions................................................................................................. 4 Principles and objectives of any new fee structure....................................................... 4 Preferred Models .......................................................................................................... 8 Special Cases............................................................................................................. 11 Compensation Fund ................................................................................................... 13 Impacts of the new regime on private practice ........................................................... 15 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 16 30/10/2009 1 www.sra.org.uk Introduction 1. The consultation paper, Moving towards a Fairer Fee Policy, was part of the first phase of an engagement strategy designed to collate views of the profession, its representative bodies and other stakeholders on how the costs of regulation should be shared and what the best approach to establish a fairer fee charging structure should be. It also dealt with new ways of setting compensation fund contributions. 2. The consultation
  • Draft Authorisation Framework for the Approval of Education and Training

    Draft Authorisation Framework for the Approval of Education and Training

    Authorisation Framework for the Approval of Education and Training Organisations (DRAFT 9.3, 3 October 2017) BSB Authorisation Framework CONTENTS Table of Contents PREAMBLE ............................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 2 COMPONENTS AND PATHWAYS ........................................................................... 4 AUTHORISATION, RE-AUTHORISATION AND MONITORING............................... 8 THE FOUR PRINCIPLES – WHAT THEY MEAN .................................................... 10 FLEXIBILITY ....................................................................................................................... 10 ACCESSIBILITY ................................................................................................................. 11 AFFORDABILITY ................................................................................................................ 12 HIGH STANDARDS ............................................................................................................ 13 THE FOUR PRINCIPLES – WHAT THE BSB WANTS TO SEE - INDICATORS ... 14 FLEXIBILITY ....................................................................................................................... 14 Strategic Goals and Oversight ......................................................................................... 14 Education and Training ...................................................................................................
  • Meeting of the Bar Standards Board

    Meeting of the Bar Standards Board

    Meeting of the Bar Standards Board Thursday 27 November 2014, 4.30 pm Room 1, First Floor, Bar Standards Board Offices, 289-293 High Holborn, London, WC1V 7HZ Agenda Part 1 – Public Page 1. Welcome and introductions Chair (4.30 pm) 2. Apologies Chair 3. Members’ interests and hospitality Chair 4. Approval of Part 1 (public) minutes: 23 October 2014 Annex A 3-10 5. Matters Arising Chair’s sign off of BTT Handbook; BPTC Handbook; General Guide to CPD; Pupillage Handbook. 6. a) Action points and progress Annex B Chair 11-16 b) Forward agendas Annex C Chair 17-18 Items for discussion 7. Performance Report for Q2 (Jul – Sept 2014) BSB 082 (14) Anne Wright 19-36 (4.40 pm) 8. BSB annual report on BTAS and the Browne BSB 083 (14) Vanessa Davies 37-53 recommendations (5.00 pm) 9. Chair’s Report on Visits and Meetings: BSB 084 (14) Chair 55-56 Oct 14 – Nov 14 10. Director General’s Report BSB 085 (14) Vanessa Davies 57-68 (5.20 pm) 11. Any other business (5.25 pm) 12. Date of next meetings Thursday 11 December 2014 (Board Away Day) Thursday 29 January 2015 (full Board meeting) 13. Private Session John Picken, Board & Committees Officer [email protected] 20 November 2014 BSB 271114 2 ANNEX A Part 1 - Public Part 1 - Public Minutes of the Bar Standards Board meeting Thursday 23 October 2014, Room 1.1, First Floor 289 – 293 High Holborn, London, WC1V 7HZ Present: Ruth Deech QC (Hon) (Chair) Patricia Robertson QC (Vice Chair) Rolande Anderson Rob Behrens Sarah Clarke (items 7-17) Justine Davidge Tim Robinson Andrew Sanders Anne Wright
  • The Bsb Handbook Part Ii

    The Bsb Handbook Part Ii

    Annexe D Part II: The Code of Conduct THE BSB HANDBOOK PART II – THE CODE OF CONDUCT CONTENTS A. APPLICATION B. THE CORE DUTIES C. THE CONDUCT RULES C1 YOU AND THE COURT C2 BEHAVING ETHICALLY C3 YOU AND YOUR CLIENT C4 YOU AND YOUR REGULATOR C5 YOU AND YOUR PRACTICE C5.1 GENERAL C5.2 SELF-EMPLOYED BARRISTERS C5.3 CHAMBERS C.5.4 ENTITIES D. RULES APPLYING TO SPECIFIC GROUPS OF REGULATED PERSONS D1 SELF-EMPLOYED BARRISTERS, CHAMBERS, BSB AUTHORISED BODIES AND THEIR MANAGERS D1.1 COMPLAINTS RULES D1.2 EQUALITY AND DIVERSITY D1.3 PUPILLAGE FUNDING AND ADVERTISING D2 BARRISTERS UNDERTAKING PUBLIC ACCESS OR LICENSED ACCESS WORK D2.1 PUBLIC ACCESS RULES D2.2 LICENSED ACCESS RULES D3 PRACTISING BARRISTERS OR ENTITIES PROVIDING CRIMINAL ADVOCACY D4.1 QASA RULES1 1 To be added later 1 Annexe D Part II: The Code of Conduct D4 REGISTERED EUROPEAN LAWYERS D5 UNREGISTERED BARRISTERS D6 CROSS BORDER ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA2 2 To be added later 2 Part II : The Code of Conduct Section A: Application A. APPLICATION II.A1. [Link to main introduction] II.A2. Who? II.A2.1 Section II.B (Core Duties): applies to all BSB regulated persons except where stated otherwise, and references to "you" and "your" in Section II.B shall be construed accordingly. II.A2.2 Section II.C (Conduct Rules): (a) Applies to all BSB regulated persons apart from unregistered barristers except where stated otherwise. (b) Rules II.C1.R2, II.C1.R3, II.C2.R1, II.C3.R2, II.C3.R5 and II.C4.R1 to II.C4.R7 (and associated guidance to those rules) and the guidance on Core Duties also apply to unregistered barristers.
  • Ideas of Equity (Pdf)

    Ideas of Equity (Pdf)

    Ideas of Equity 00A_PoE_prelims.pmd 1 15/05/2017, 21:45 STUDIES IN SCOTS LAW Series Editor Kenneth G C Reid Editorial Board Alan R Barr Sandra M Eden George L Gretton Volumes in the series 1. Ross Gilbert Anderson, Assignation (2008) 2. Andrew J M Steven, Pledge and Lien (2008) 3. Craig Anderson, Possession of Corporeal Moveables (2015) 4. Jill Robbie, Private Water Rights (2015) 5. Daniel J Carr, Ideas of Equity (2017) 00A_PoE_prelims.pmd 2 15/05/2017, 21:45 STUDIES IN SCOTS LAW VOLUME 5 Ideas of Equity Daniel J Carr Lecturer in Private Law, University of Edinburgh Lecturer in Law, Robert Gordon University EDINBURGH LEGAL EDUCATION TRUST 2017 00A_PoE_prelims.pmd 3 15/05/2017, 21:45 Published by Edinburgh Legal Education Trust School of Law University of Edinburgh Old College South Bridge Edinburgh EH8 9YL http://www.centreforprivatelaw.ed.ac.uk/monograph_series First published 2017 © Daniel J Carr, 2017 The author asserts his moral rights. ISBN 978-0-9556332-9-4 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the written permission of the copyright owner. Applications for the copyright owner’s permission to reproduce any part of this publication should be addressed to the publisher. Typeset by Etica Press Ltd, Malvern Printed and bound by Martins the Printers, Berwick-upon-Tweed 00A_PoE_prelims.pmd 4 15/05/2017, 21:45 Contents Preface vii Table of Cases ix Table of Statutes xvii Abbreviations xix 1 Introduction 1 2 Historical Understandings of Equity 14 3 Unjustified Enrichment 53 4 Trusts 104 5 Constructive Trusts 134 6 Fiduciary Law 184 7 Conclusion 219 Index 219 v 00A_PoE_prelims.pmd 5 15/05/2017, 21:45 00A_PoE_prelims.pmd 6 15/05/2017, 21:45 Preface This book is an updated version of my doctoral thesis submitted in 2009, and awarded by the University of Cambridge in 2010.
  • Partnership Law (LC 283; SLC 192)

    Partnership Law (LC 283; SLC 192)

    The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission (LAW COM No 283) (SCOT LAW COM No 192) PARTNERSHIP LAW Report on a Reference under Section 3(1)(e) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 Presented to the Parliament of the United Kingdom by the Lord High Chancellor by Command of Her Majesty Laid before the Scottish Parliament by the Scottish Ministers November 2003 Cm 6015 SE/2003/299 £xx.xx The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission were set up by the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Honourable Mr Justice Toulson, Chairman Professor Hugh Beale QC Mr Stuart Bridge Professor Martin Partington CBE Judge Alan Wilkie QC The Chief Executive of the Law Commission is Mr Michael Sayers and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WC1N 2BQ. The Scottish Law Commissioners are: The Honourable Lord Eassie, Chairman Professor Gerard Maher Professor Kenneth G C Reid Professor Joseph M Thomson Mr Colin J Tyre QC The Secretary of the Scottish Law Commission is Miss Jane L McLeod and its offices are at 140 Causewayside, Edinburgh EH9 1PR. The terms of this report were agreed on 10 October 2003. The text of this report is available on the Internet at: http://www.lawcom.gov.uk http://www.scotlawcom.gov.uk ii THE LAW COMMISSION THE SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION PARTNERSHIP LAW CONTENTS Paragraph Page SECTION A: INTRODUCTORY (PARTS I – III) PART I: INTRODUCTION 1 Partnership law reform in its context 1.1 1 The role of partnerships in the business world
  • Professional Courses GDL/CPE, LPC, BPTC and LLM Contents

    Professional Courses GDL/CPE, LPC, BPTC and LLM Contents

    Bristol Institute of Legal Practice www.uwe.ac.uk Professional Courses GDL/CPE, LPC, BPTC and LLM Contents Why choose Bristol Institute of Legal 3 Practice (BILP)? Enhancing employability 4 Careers and student support 5 Graduate Diploma in Law/CPE (GDL/CPE) 9 (full-time and part-time) Legal Practice Course (LPC) 14 (full-time and part-time) Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC) 25 (full-time and part-time) LLM Advanced Legal Practice 29 Visit us 30 Financial Information 30 2 www.uwe.ac.uk/bilp Why choose Bristol Institute of Legal Practice? The Bristol Institute of Legal Practice (BILP) is part of the wider Faculty of Business and Law at UWE (which comprises Bristol Law School and Bristol Business School). With more than forty years’ successful involvement in professional vocational legal education, a strong national and international reputation and established links with both legal professions and business, we are widely recognised as one of the leading providers of professional legal education in the UK. We have a reputation for excellence within the legal profession and for delivering courses of the very highest quality. BILP’s professional courses will provide you with a foundation for a career in Law that is hard to match. • We understand that students today face increasing competition to secure employment in a challenging and rapidly changing market place and we put great emphasis on the careers support and added business focus that we give our students. • Our LPC is one of a very few providers nationally to have continuously held the SRA’s highest possible grading of ‘excellent’.
  • Sexual Harassment in the Workplace

    Sexual Harassment in the Workplace

    House of Commons Women and Equalities Committee Sexual harassment in the workplace Fifth Report of Session 2017–19 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 18 July 2018 HC 725 Published on 25 July 2018 by authority of the House of Commons Women and Equalities Committee The Women and Equalities Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Government Equalities Office (GEO). Current membership Mrs Maria Miller MP (Conservative, Basingstoke) (Chair) Tonia Antoniazzi MP (Labour, Gower) Sarah Champion (Labour, Rotherham) Angela Crawley MP (Scottish National Party, Lanark and Hamilton East) Philip Davies MP (Conservative, Shipley) Vicky Ford MP (Conservative, Chelmsford) Kirstene Hair MP (Conservative, Angus) Eddie Hughes MP (Conservative, Walsall North) Jess Phillips MP (Labour, Birmingham, Yardley) Mr Gavin Shuker MP (Labour (Co-op), Luton South) Tulip Siddiq MP (Labour, Hampstead and Kilburn) Rosie Duffield MP (Labour, Canterbury) Jared O’Mara MP (Independent, Sheffield, Hallam) Teresa Pearce MP (Labour, Erith and Thamesmead) were members of the Committee during this inquiry. Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/womenandequalities and in print by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is published on the inquiry publications page of the Committee’s website. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Judith Boyce (Clerk), Luanne Middleton (Second Clerk), Holly Dustin, Tansy Hutchinson, and Shai Jacobs (Committee Specialists), Axell Kaubo (Inquiry Manager), Alexandra Hunter-Wainwright (Senior Committee Assistant), Mandy Sullivan (Committee Assistant), and Liz Parratt and Simon Horswell (Media Officers).
  • This Is a Publication of the Stair Society. This Publication Is Licensed by Thomas H

    This Is a Publication of the Stair Society. This Publication Is Licensed by Thomas H

    This is a publication of The Stair Society. This publication is licensed by Thomas H. Drysdale and The Stair Society under Creative Commons license CC-BY-NC-ND and may be freely shared for non-commercial purposes so long as the creators are credited. Thomas H. Drysdale, ‘The Stair Society: The Early Years’, in: Stair Society 52 [Miscellany V] (2005) 243–267 https://doi.org/10.36098/stairsoc/history.1 The Stair Society was founded in 1934 to encourage the study and advance the knowledge of the history of Scots Law, by the publication of original works, and by the reprinting and editing of works of rarity or importance. As a member of the Society, you will receive a copy of every volume published during your membership. Volumes are bound in hardcover and produced to a high quality. We also offer the opportunity to purchase past volumes in stock at substantially discounted prices; pre-publication access to material in press; and free access to the complete electronic versions of Stair Soci- ety publications on HeinOnline. Membership of the society is open to all with an interest in the history of Scots law, whether based in the UK or abroad. Indivi- dual members include practising lawyers, legal academics, law students and others. Corporate members include a wide range of academic and professional institutions, libraries and law firms. Membership rates are modest, and we offer concessionary rates for students, recently qualified and called solicitors and advocates, and those undertaking training for these qualifica- tions. Please visit:
  • Law Society Complaints Procedure Uk

    Law Society Complaints Procedure Uk

    Law Society Complaints Procedure Uk Die-hard Norris controlling all. Mikhail cry menacingly. Disliked Neel beshrews giocoso. Bonuses have otherwise been accounted for. Scotlandwho should make responsible for complaints handling. Directing the complaint for our attorneys. Scottish legal advice, apologise or law. We are law society complaints procedure details provided and the complaint arising from the use. Our Complaints Policy Cognitive Law. Income to and Corporation Tax payment also frequently relevant. What regulating body that complaint in law society or the procedures in the information in all your membership, which is acting for complaint is needed for? If this procedure of complaint please contact law society or advising or chief managing partner responsible for loss of completing his views on. All firms of solicitors in England and Wales will missing a complaints procedure. If you know and complaints committee in law society to providing it should be bound to. The law society about our central register and completions take longer practising in terms of the ssdt is found. If, for heart reason, Mr Gibbins is unavailable, please contact Dr Laura Brampton instead. Terms and conditions Hughes Solicitors. They will then the law charge you any solutions agreed method, then you are only if you become final responsibility for you of an independent? It just fail to illustrate how speaking the times most lawyers are now it comes to refer service and pick some believe them are talking to workshop a nasty attack when competitors who grieve this seriously enter the market. If you are law society complaints procedure before continuing instructions on the complaint? The reality is, consistent most cases, very different.
  • Future Bar Training Consultation on The

    Future Bar Training Consultation on The

    Annex 1 to BSB Paper 002 (16) Part 1 – Public Future Bar Training Consultation on the Future of Training for the Bar: Academic, Vocational and Professional Stages of Training Summary of responses January 2016 BSB 280116 Annex 1 to BSB Paper 002 (16) Part 1 – Public Executive Summary Background to the consultation In summer 2013, the Bar Standards Board (BSB), the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and ILEX Professional Standards (IPS; now called CILEX Regulation) published the Legal Education and Training Review (LETR). This was a large, independent review of the system of training legal professionals in England and Wales. The review recognised many good features in the system for training barristers. It also looked to the future and recommended reform so that training would be better matched for barristers and clients in 2020 and beyond. In February 2015, we published our vision for the future of training for the Bar. In that paper, we set out our proposal for a Professional Statement that describes the standards that should be expected of all authorised barristers upon entry to the profession. In addition, we explained why we were embarking on a review of how we are involved in setting education and training requirements for barristers. The Future Bar Training consultation, launched in the summer of 2015, built on that paper, exploring what changes might be made to the current system. It examined possible approaches to reform of the system and regulatory requirements, and considered the current three-stage formulation of training. Responses to the consultation There were 58 responses to the consultation.
  • List of Freemasons from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Jump To: Navigation , Search

    List of Freemasons from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Jump To: Navigation , Search

    List of Freemasons From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation , search Part of a series on Masonic youth organizations Freemasonry DeMolay • A.J.E.F. • Job's Daughters International Order of the Rainbow for Girls Core articles Views of Masonry Freemasonry • Grand Lodge • Masonic • Lodge • Anti-Masonry • Anti-Masonic Party • Masonic Lodge Officers • Grand Master • Prince Hall Anti-Freemason Exhibition • Freemasonry • Regular Masonic jurisdictions • Opposition to Freemasonry within • Christianity • Continental Freemasonry Suppression of Freemasonry • History Masonic conspiracy theories • History of Freemasonry • Liberté chérie • Papal ban of Freemasonry • Taxil hoax • Masonic manuscripts • People and places Masonic bodies Masonic Temple • James Anderson • Masonic Albert Mackey • Albert Pike • Prince Hall • Masonic bodies • York Rite • Order of Mark Master John the Evangelist • John the Baptist • Masons • Holy Royal Arch • Royal Arch Masonry • William Schaw • Elizabeth Aldworth • List of Cryptic Masonry • Knights Templar • Red Cross of Freemasons • Lodge Mother Kilwinning • Constantine • Freemasons' Hall, London • House of the Temple • Scottish Rite • Knight Kadosh • The Shrine • Royal Solomon's Temple • Detroit Masonic Temple • List of Order of Jesters • Tall Cedars of Lebanon • The Grotto • Masonic buildings Societas Rosicruciana • Grand College of Rites • Other related articles Swedish Rite • Order of St. Thomas of Acon • Royal Great Architect of the Universe • Square and Compasses Order of Scotland • Order of Knight Masons • Research • Pigpen cipher • Lodge • Corks Eye of Providence • Hiram Abiff • Masonic groups for women Sprig of Acacia • Masonic Landmarks • Women and Freemasonry • Order of the Amaranth • Pike's Morals and Dogma • Propaganda Due • Dermott's Order of the Eastern Star • Co-Freemasonry • DeMolay • Ahiman Rezon • A.J.E.F.