Environment Manifesto

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environment Manifesto introduction The Green Party is the only party that activity, wildlife and nature across puts the environment at the heart of all this country is in decline. The 2016 our policies - because, quite simply, State of Nature report reported that a prosperous, thriving future will be almost 60% of species in the UK are in green - or not at all. long-term decline, while 15% are at risk of disappearing from our shores Our economic prosperity depends on altogether. the natural world. It is the ultimate source of everything we make and use This national picture is only a drop in - from food and materials, to the air the ocean of a global ecological crisis: we breathe. Even the digital economy humans are pushing at the boundaries depends on rare earth metals and huge of our planet. With 2016 the hottest amounts of energy. And we rely on year on record, and a climate-denier delicate ecological systems to sustain in the White House, the need for bold life on earth - from bees pollinating and dynamic action on climate change our crops to trees absorbing carbon has never been more urgent. The UK dioxide. Building a successful economy must lead the world in building a green is not at odds with protecting our economy and investing in a viable environment: it is impossible without future - one that respects and nurtures it. Right now, we are destroying the the natural systems on which we foundations of our economy faster depend. than they can be regenerated: we are eroding the ground we’re standing on. The United Kingdom has a unique and beautiful natural environment – from the magical Giant’s Causeway to the idyllic South Downs, the rolling Northumberland Coast to the majestic peaks of the Lake District. Unfortunately, due to intensive farming, climate change, and other human environment manifesto / page 1 RESTORE OUR NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AND ENSURE EQUAL ACCESS FOR ALL The Green Party would set an inspiring and Areas of Outstanding Natural » Promote a network of new inter- We would levy a one-off fine on vision for the natural world, both on Beauty – and including a long- linking local ecological spaces car manufacturers who cheated land and at sea, with thriving species, term 25 year target for biodiversity, on both land and sea, ensuring that the emissions testing regime, and healthy habitats, and ensuring the water and air quality. both our wildest places and urban introduce a new Clear Air Act, it would: environment is top of the political green spaces are protected and agenda. » Create a new environmental allowed to flourish. » Expand and strengthen a regulator and court to effectively mandatory Clean Air Zone A Green Guarantee in Brexit and monitor and enforce environmental NB: Environmental regulations, network, empowering local Trade Deals law - this would include new monitoring and reporting would be authorities to take control of air statutory requirements for updates negotiated with and alongside the pollution in their communities. From restrictions on pesticides to to (and debates in) Parliament on devolved administrations. protect our bees, to crucial regulations the state of nature and biodiversity. » Remove diesel cars from our on dangerous chemicals in toys, the » Establish roads – including an increase in Green Party will ensure that existing a right for every Vehicle Excise Duty on new diesel environmental laws are retained, person in the UK vehicles, and a scrappage scheme. or enhanced, no matter our future to have access to relationship with the European Union. a healthy and safe » Promote cycling and walking We will ensure that importortant natural green space through a £2bn programme of principles – such as the Precautionary promoting good investment in healthy, active and Polluter-Pays principles – are mental health, physical transport. transposed into UK statute books. exercise, and building community. Protection from Climate Change Environmental Protection Act Clean Our Air Even if we cut global emissions to zero We will introduce an Environmental today, the effects of climate change Protection Act, this will: The UK is facing will be felt for generations. We would a public health invest in a climate-proof future – for » Guarantee strong protections for emergency – over example, by building flood defences, our natural environment and 40,000 early deaths investing in natural flood management, oceans, especially for the Green are attributable to air including restoring uplands, to make Belt, National Parks, SSSIs pollution every year. every community safe. environment manifesto / page 2 environment manifesto / page 3 TAKE BACK CONTROL OF OUR ENERGY SYSTEm Our energy system is broken and Clean, Renewable Energy solar-photovoltaics; scaling up A Fair and Just Energy System is not delivering what households investment in offshore wind and and businesses need. Captured by The Green Party will breathe life marine renewables; significant » End the monopoly of the Big corporate profit, ripping us off, and back into the Climate Change Act investment in vehicle electrification Six by building democratic, fuelled by dirty energy that belongs by investing in an energy system fit and charging infrastructure; and a locally owned alternatives. We in the past, it is failing us both as for the 21st century. We will ensure comprehensive plan to decarbonise will require grid operators to give customers and as citizens. We need that all new investment in energy is heat, including pilot residential and priority access to community to harness the dramatically falling directed towards clean, renewable commercial projects. energy projects, and pioneer a costs of renewable energy and seize energy, and a smarter, networked grid, new Community Energy Tool Kit the opportunity to both tackle climate with battery-storage, demand-side » Create a new Green Investment to empower local communities change and take back control of measures, and interconnection. This and Innovation Centre with to create energy and municipal our energy system. The Green Party would be detailed in a comprehensive borrowing powers to help create heating projects in every town would end the monopoly of the Big Clean Energy Plan, and would include: and finance the transition to a and city. Six, and ensure that no-one is forced zero-carbon economy. This would to live in fuel poverty - whilst also » Keep fossil fuels where they replace the UK Green Investment » Introduce progressive energy democratising the way energy assets belong: in the ground. We will Bank – a victim of reckless tariffs so that small consumers are funded. introduce a ban on fracking, Conservative ideology – and create pay less per unit than large ones, phase-out the £6bn-a-year fossil a government owned hub for special needs are recognised, Global Climate Cooperation fuel subsidies, bring forward the innovation and investment in our people are not cut off when they coal phase-out date to 2023 (at low-carbon economy. can’t afford to pay, and nobody We will stand alongside those countries the latest), divest public funds is forced to have pre-payment across the world fighting for climate from the fossil fuel industry, and » End the reckless gamble with meters. justice, and push for concerted global ensure a just transition for those nuclear power – we will cancel action to limit warming to 1.5 degrees. communities dependent on fossil the contracts for Hinkley Point C » Embark upon a national We would clearly outline how the fuel jobs. (saving £37bn), and scrap plans programme of insulation and UK would meet our domestic and for all new nuclear power stations, retrofitting to make every home international obligations – ending the » End the effective ban instead investing in renewable warm – bringing two million people current policy uncertainty - whilst on onshore wind – the cheapest energy, a flexible grid, and out of fuel poverty, insulating making climate change a major foreign form of new electricity generation interconnection to Europe. nine million homes, and creating policy priority. – and introducing new support for hundreds of thousands of jobs onshore wind and across the UK. In addition, we will environment manifesto / page 4 environment manifesto / page 5 FARMING AND FISHING THAT WORK FOR PEOPLE AND PLANET ensure that all new homes are built Bonds by allowing tax-free bonds Intensive agriculture and fishing has Restoring and Protecting our to zero-carbon standards by 2020. for green projects, and issuing been disastrous the natural world – for Oceans government backed Green Bonds example, it is estimated that the UK » Democratise energy ownership - and requiring all projects that only has 100 harvests left because We will ensure the completion of an by reforming Tax Relief for obtain government support to have intensive agriculture has left our soils ecologically-coherent network of smaller-scale projects, introducing a community ownership element. in a dire state. The Green Party will well-managed marine protection areas Green ISAs, promoting Green create more sustainable farming and around the UK, and in UK Overseas land-use policies that are focussed on Territories. In addition, any new restoring the UK’s natural environment fisheries legislation must contain a – as well as ensure that reuse and legal requirement to fish below a level recycling are at the heart of our that allows fish stocks to fully recover, economy. should promote locally-led fishing that supports coastal economies, and bring A Fairer Food System an end to damaging fishing operations in protected areas. We will implement
Recommended publications
  • The Green Movement in Turkey
    #4.13 PERSPECTIVES Political analysis and commentary from Turkey FEATURE ARTICLES THE GREEN MOVEMENT IN TURKEY DEMOCRACY INTERNATIONAL POLITICS HUMAN LANDSCAPE AKP versus women Turkish-American relations and the Taner Öngür: Gülfer Akkaya Middle East in Obama’s second term The long and winding road Page 52 0Nar $OST .IyeGO 3erkaN 3eyMeN Page 60 Page 66 TURKEY REPRESENTATION Content Editor’s note 3 Q Feature articles: The Green Movement in Turkey Sustainability of the Green Movement in Turkey, Bülent Duru 4 Environmentalists in Turkey - Who are they?, BArë GenCer BAykAn 8 The involvement of the green movement in the political space, Hande Paker 12 Ecofeminism: Practical and theoretical possibilities, %Cehan Balta 16 Milestones in the Õght for the environment, Ahmet Oktay Demiran 20 Do EIA reports really assess environmental impact?, GonCa 9lmaZ 25 Hydroelectric power plants: A great disaster, a great malice, 3emahat 3evim ­ZGür GürBüZ 28 Latest notes on history from Bergama, ­Zer Akdemir 34 A radioactive landÕll in the heart of ÊXmir, 3erkan OCak 38 Q Culture Turkish television series: an overview, &eyZa Aknerdem 41 Q Ecology Seasonal farm workers: Pitiful victims or Kurdish laborers? (II), DeniZ DuruiZ 44 Q Democracy Peace process and gender equality, Ulrike Dufner 50 AKP versus women, Gülfer Akkaya 52 New metropolitan municipalities, &ikret TokSÇZ 56 Q International politics Turkish-American relations and the Middle East in Obama’s second term, Pnar DoSt .iyeGo 60 Q Human landscape Taner Öngür: The long and winding road, Serkan Seymen
    [Show full text]
  • Green Parties in National Governments: from Protest to Acquiescence?
    Green Parties in National Governments: From Protest to Acquiescence? Thomas Poguntke Keele European Parties Research Unit (KEPRU) Working Paper 9 © Thomas Poguntke, 2001 ISSN 1475-1569 ISBN 1-899488-34-0 KEPRU Working Papers are published by: School of Politics, International Relations and the Environment (SPIRE) Keele University Staffs ST5 5BG, UK tel +44 (0)1782 58 4177/3088/3452 fax +44 (0)1782 58 3592 www.keele.ac.uk/depts/spire/ Editor: Professor Thomas Poguntke ([email protected]) KEPRU Working Papers are available via SPIRE’s website. Launched in September 2000, the Keele European Parties Research Unit (KEPRU) was the first research grouping of its kind in the UK. It brings together the hitherto largely independent work of Keele researchers focusing on European political parties, and aims: • to facilitate its members' engagement in high-quality academic research, individually, collectively in the Unit and in collaboration with cognate research groups and individuals in the UK and abroad; • to hold regular conferences, workshops, seminars and guest lectures on topics related to European political parties; • to publish a series of parties-related research papers by scholars from Keele and elsewhere; • to expand postgraduate training in the study of political parties, principally through Keele's MA in Parties and Elections and the multinational PhD summer school, with which its members are closely involved; • to constitute a source of expertise on European parties and party politics for media and other interests. The Unit shares the broader aims of the Keele European Research Centre, of which it is a part. KERC comprises staff and postgraduates at Keele who are actively conducting research into the politics of remaking and integrating Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecofeminist Ideology of Petra Kelly: the Challenges of Modern Political Thought Nadić, Darko
    www.ssoar.info Ecofeminist Ideology of Petra Kelly: The Challenges of Modern Political Thought Nadić, Darko Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Nadić, D. (2013). Ecofeminist Ideology of Petra Kelly: The Challenges of Modern Political Thought. European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities, 2(2), 63-70. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-341831 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de European Quarterly of Political Attitudes and Mentalities EQPAM Vol.2, No.2, April 2013 ISSN 2285 – 4916 ISSN- L 2285 - 4916 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Ecofeminist Ideology of Petra Kelly: The Challenges of Modern Political Thought1 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Darko Nadić Faculty of Political Science, University of Belgrade, Serbia Submission to ECPAM’2012: June 15th, 2012 Accepted for ECPAM’2012: July 15th, 2012 Submission to EQPAM: March 28th , 2013 Accepted for EQPAM: April 15th, 2013 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract Petra Kelly (1947-1992) has remained recorded in history as one of the true icons of modern German and European environmental movement. Combining the ideas of feminism, peace, nonviolence, ecology (environmental protection) and social justice, she has managed to reconcile these seemingly opposing ideas and merge them into one specific type of ideology that was the guiding idea of the German Green Party until the mid-nineties of the last century.
    [Show full text]
  • IJTM/IJCEE PAGE Templatev2
    Int. J. Green Economics, Vol. 1, Nos. 1/2, 2006 201 Green economics: an introduction and research agenda Derek Wall Goldsmiths College, University of London New Cross, London SE14 6NW, UK E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Green economics: An introduction and research agenda, examines the historical evolution of green economics, a discourse which is marked by antipathy to the foundational assumptions of conventional market based economics. Green opposition to growth and the market is identified along with values of ecological sustainability, social justice, decentralisation and peace. To move beyond a critical account, green economics, as a discipline, needs to establish a research agenda based on: 1 examining global political economy 2 developing forms of regulation beyond the market and the state 3 examining the transition to such an alternative economy. Keywords: green economics; global political economy; regulation; transition; economic growth; anti-capitalism; Marx; open source; usufruct; commons. Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Wall, D. (2006) ‘Green economics: an introduction and research agenda’, Int. J. Green Economics, Vol. 1, Nos. 1/2, pp.201–214. Biographical notes: Derek Wall teaches Political Economy at Goldsmiths College, University of London in the Politics Department. His PhD, ‘The Politics of Earth First! UK’ was completed in 1998. He has published six books on green economics including, most recently, Babylon and Beyond: The Economics of Anti-Capitalist, Anti-Globalist and Radical Green Movements (Pluto 2005). He is a long standing eco-socialist and the founder of the Association of Socialist Greens. He is a member of International Zen Association. His next book, Shopping Without Money, will look at a wide variety of non-monetary forms of economic regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • ALLIANCE 90/THE GREENS: Party Program and Principles the Future Is Green
    The future is green. ALLIANCE 90/THE GREENS: Party Program and Principles The future is green. ALLIANCE 90/THE GREENS: Party Program and Principles Preamble 7 I. Our values 7 Ecology is sustainability 8 Freedom is realised through self-determination 8 Extending equitability 9 Democracy is the basis 10 The touchstone of our values: Human rights and non-violence 11 II. Challenges in a changing world 12 III. Where we come from – who we are 16 IV. Twelve for 2020 17 Towards the ecological age 18 I. The fundamental principles of our environmental policy 19 II. Sustainable development as a principle for action 20 III. Economical use of resources and the efficiency revolution 21 IV. Ecology and lifestyle 22 V. New energy – from the fossil and nuclear age to the solar future 22 A key project: Towards the solar age 24 Sustainable development in towns and local areas 25 VI. Environmentally-friendly traffic systems 27 A key project: Ecologically mobile 29 1 The future is green. VII. Nature and landscape conservancy 30 VIII. Animals need rights 31 IX. A global perspective for the environment and development 32 Towards an ecological and social market economy 34 I. The foundations of our economic policy 35 A key project: The future of a united Germany 38 II. Market economy and regulative policy 39 A key project: Transparency for consumers 40 III. Ecological fiscal reform 40 IV. Consumer protection 41 V. The knowledge economy 41 VI. Regional economies 42 A key project: A new form of agriculture 43 VII. A sustainable fiscal policy 45 VIII.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda: ENTITLE Supervisory
    ENTITLE School on Democracy, Justice & Institutions Istanbul, 15th – 20th June (Provisional) Agenda 15th June, Monday, 9.00-17.30 Ontologies and Epistemologies for Political Ecology Introduction to the School, Begüm Özkaynak and Christos Zografos, 9.00 – 9.30 The Capitalocene Today and in the Past, Jason W. Moore, Binghamton University, 9.30 – 11.00 Coffee 11.00 – 11.30 Alternative Epistemologies of Human-Environment Relations, Ayfer Bartu-Candan, Boğaziçi University, 11.30 – 13.00 Lunch 13.00 – 14.30 ENTITLE Assembly: Future of the Network and Political Commitments, 14.30 – 17.30 (internal event) Dinner, Venue tbc, 19.30 1 16th June, Tuesday, 9.30 – 18.00 Democracy and Transformational Politics Communities of Crisis, Squares in Movement, Stavros Stavrides, National Technical University of Athens, 9.30 – 10.30 Radical Ecological Democracy, Ashish Kothari, Kalpavriksh, 10.30 – 11.30 Coffee 11.30 – 12.00 Interactive Session with Stavros Stavrides and Ashish Kothari, 12.00 – 13.00 Lunch 13.00 – 14.30 The role of ecology, democracy and alternative epistemologies in the analysis and praxis of environmental politics – Panel discussion with guest speakers, fellows and mentors of the ENTITLE network, 14.30 – 16.00 Coffee 16.00 – 16.30 The Rojava Experience with Radical Democracy – Roundtable discussion with scholars and activists from Turkey and Syria, 16.30 – 18.00 17th June, Wednesday, 9.30 – 17.30, Fieldtrip on “Justice Struggles” (internal event) Morning: visit by bus to the sites of mega-infrastructure projects in and around Istanbul, together with local activists Lunch will be organized on-site. Afternoon: visit to the “Project of production without a boss”, Kazova Textile Workers Factory in Fatih District.
    [Show full text]
  • GERMAN GREENS in COALITION GOVERNMENTS a Political Analysis
    GERMAN GREENS IN COALITION GOVERNMENTS A Political Analysis by Arne Jungjohann 1 GERMAN GREENS IN COALITION GOVERNMENTS A Political Analysis A Political Analysis A Political German Greens in Coalition Governments German Greens in Coalition Governments A Political Analysis By Arne Jungjohann Published by the Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung European Union English version published with the support of the Green European Foundation About the author CONTENTS Arne Jungjohann is an energy analyst and political scientist. He advises foundations, think tanks, and civil society in communication and strategy building for climate and energy policy. Previously, he worked for Minister President Winfried Kretschmann of Baden-Württemberg, the Heinrich Böll Foundation in Washington DC, in the German Bundestag, and in the family owned business. As its editor he launched the most influential English Twitter account on the German Energiewende (@ EnergiewendeGER). He co-authored ‘Energy Democracy: Germany’s Energiewende to Renewables’ Foreword 7 (Palgrave Macmillan 2016). Arne is a member of the Green Academy, a network with leading thinkers Foreword by the author 9 from science, politics and civil society which is facilitated by the Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung. He is the founder of the local chapter of the German Green Party in Washington DC and lives in Stuttgart. He studied at Philipps University Marburg and at the Free University of Berlin. 1 Introduction 11 1.1 State of the research and sources used 12 1.2 Lead Questions and Composition of the Study 14 2 Coalition Constellations 15 3 The Coalition Arena at State Level 19 3.1 Departmental Responsibilities of the Greens 19 3.2 Coalition Management in the G-states 26 3.2.1 The Bundesrat Clause 27 3.2.2 Coalition Personnel 28 3.2.3 Coalition Committees 30 You are free to share – copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material.
    [Show full text]
  • The Green Party of Germany: Bündnis 90 / Die Grünen [PDF]
    THE GREEN PARTY OF GERMANY BÜNDNIS 90 / DIE GRÜNEN 1. Historical Context and democratic structure of Germany The political structures that existed before a united German state emerged were dominated by relatively small political entities, which enjoyed varying degrees of political autonomy. The Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Federal Republic of Germany) is formally only 70 years old. Unsurprisingly, this history of federalism is represented in the Bundesrepublik as well. Today we have 16 federal states. This decentralization is one of the most important parts of our democracy. Berlin, as the capital, was and is the best symbol of Germany’s colourful past. West Berlin’s location deep within the territory of Eastern Germany made it an island of the Bundesrepublik (Western Germany). West Berlin has had a very special phase after WWII that was deeply intertwined with the Cold War. With the end of the Cold War, the two German states the German Democratic Republic or GDR (East Germany) and Bundesrepublik finally became a united state again. Today, Berlin with its 3.6 million inhabitants, is Germany’s biggest city, its capital and the place to be for culture, arts, lifestyle, politics and science. Germany’s democratic system is a federal parliamentary republic with two chambers: the Bundestag (Germany’s parliament) and the Bundesrat (the representative body of the federal states). Germany’s political system is essentially a multi-party system, which includes a 5% threshold (parties representing recognised national minorities, for example Danes, Frisians, Sorbs and Romani people are exempt from the 5% threshold, but normally only run in state elections).
    [Show full text]
  • Derek Wall Babylon and Beyond: the Economics of Anti-Capitalist, Anti-Globalist and Radical Green Movements
    Canadian Journal of Sociology Online January-February 2006 Derek Wall Babylon and Beyond: The Economics of Anti-Capitalist, Anti-Globalist and Radical Green Movements. Pluto Press, 2005, 232 pp. $US 22.95 paper (0745323901), $US 80.00 hardcover (074532391X) This book fits nicely within a developing literature on socio-political currents opposing globalized capitalism; indeed, it provides a useful guide to the field, cutting across the boundaries of disciplines and political ideologies in a wide-ranging survey of perspectives. Within his purview Wall includes the anti-capitalist capitalists — lapsed organic intellectuals of global capital such as Joseph Stiglitz and George Soros — whose alternatives amount to a bid to salvage market society via global Keynesianism, but the focus is on approaches emanating from without and from below. He canvasses the critiques of rampant corporate power offered by Naomi Klein, David Korten and others; the Marxist analysis of exploitation, capital accumulation, imperialism and recent globalization; the autonomist analysis of Empire and Multitude; the small-is-beautiful vision of green localism; and the more comprehensive ecosocialist project, to which Wall seems most sympathetic. There is even discussion of Major Douglas’s ‘social credit’ alternative to domination by the banks, deftly joined to more recent ventures into monetary reform such as the Paris-based Association for the Taxation of Transactions and for Aid to Citizens (ATTAC) — advocates of the Tobin Tax on speculative financial transactions. Wall addresses these various anti-capitalist currents in terms of three implicit thematics: the sociological, the theoretical and the practical, with an emphasis on the latter two. He offers accounts of the various elements of anti-capitalist movement activism that have provided social bases for alternative economics.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards 2030
    MANIFESTO TOWARDS 2030 A DECADE OF CHANGE Executive summary There is now international consensus that we have just a decade to make the changes necessary to halt the warming of our planet and save our natural world. We need to rethink how we live, how we travel, how we work and how we consume. We, the Green Party, have a special role to play in this decade of change, because we have spent forty years thinking about how we can protect the environment while simultaneously advancing social justice, nurturing our economy and building our communities. This manifesto details practical solutions that redress the damage done to our natural world and make Ireland a better, fairer place to live, with clean energy, cheap and accessible public transport and thriving rural communities. Every person and every place matters in making this a fair process and a just transition. In government, we will: 1. Urgently build public houses on public 8. Immediately establish a Just Transition land to alleviate the housing crisis. Commission to bring communities, trade unions, businesses, and climate 2. Invest in GP services to ease the transition experts together to overcome pressure on hospital waiting lists. obstacles to a fair transition to a low carbon economy. 3. Get Ireland moving by doubling investment in public transport, 9. Reward farmers for sequestering committing 10% of transport funds to carbon, restoring nature, and cycling and 10% to walking. producing clean energy, through a reformed Common Agricultural Policy. 4. Reduce pupil-teacher ratios, invest in third-level institutions, and end pay 10. Ban single use plastic and set up a inequality in education.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain's Green Fascists: Understanding the Relationship Between Fascism, Farming, and Ecological Concerns in Britain, 1919-1951 Alec J
    UNF Digital Commons UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship 2017 Britain's Green Fascists: Understanding the Relationship between Fascism, Farming, and Ecological Concerns in Britain, 1919-1951 Alec J. Warren University of North Florida Suggested Citation Warren, Alec J., "Britain's Green Fascists: Understanding the Relationship between Fascism, Farming, and Ecological Concerns in Britain, 1919-1951" (2017). UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 755. https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd/755 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at UNF Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UNF Digital Commons. For more information, please contact Digital Projects. © 2017 All Rights Reserved BRITAIN’S GREEN FASCISTS: Understanding the Relationship between Fascism, Farming, and Ecological Concerns in Britain, 1919-1951 by Alec Jarrell Warren A Thesis submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree in Master of Arts in History UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES August, 2017 Unpublished work © Alec Jarrell Warren This Thesis of Alec Jarrell Warren is approved: Dr. Charles Closmann Dr. Chau Kelly Dr. Yanek Mieczkowski Accepted for the Department of History: Dr. Charles Closmann Chair Accepted for the College of Arts and Sciences: Dr. George Rainbolt Dean Accepted for the University: Dr. John Kantner Dean of the Graduate School ii DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my family, who have always loved and supported me through all the highs and lows of my journey. Without them, this work would have been impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Community Shield to Suppress the Coronavirus April
    20 April 2020 Building a Community Shield to Suppress the Coronavirus Molly Scott Cato WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM LARRY SANDERS, GREEN PARTY HEALTH SPEAKER; GINA DOWDING, EXPERT IN PUBLIC HEALTH; RICHARD LAWSON, GP AND FORMER NATIONAL SPEAKER; TOM SCOTT, MEDIA AND DATA EXPERT Building a Community Shield to Suppress the Coronavirus: Foreword For a Government that likes to campaign and govern through three-word slogans, there is one which it seems to have completely missed – ‘test, test, test’. The WHO’s exhortation could scarcely have been any clearer – yet ministers have squandered vital time in failing to listen. Worse, some scientific advisers have even suggested that its advice was an unnecessary measure to curb the spread of coronavirus in Britain. Belatedly, Health Secretary Matt Hancock has recognised the urgency of ramping up testing in the UK, with a pledge to reach 100,000 tests a day by the end of this month. The chances of reaching that target currently seem slim. But the truth is that even if that target is met, testing on its own is not enough to break the chain of transmission. This paper, which draws on the work of experts in the field, makes the case for an approach which combines testing with the establishment of ‘community shields’: in other words, a network of locally-based community protection schemes, co-ordinated by Public Health England’s regional Outbreak Management Teams, working together with local authorities and GPs, to do the vital work of finding people with the virus, isolating them quickly, and tracing those they contacted. Strict isolation of cases and contacts can be monitored by appropriate phone apps and home visits.
    [Show full text]