DOCSLIB.ORG

Adderall): Efficacy Rate and Side Effects

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Adderall): Efficacy Rate and Side Effects Placebo-Controlled Evaluation of Amphetamine Mixture—Dextroamphetamine Salts and Amphetamine Salts (Adderall): Efficacy Rate and Side Effects Peter A. Ahmann, MD*; Fred W. Theye, PhD‡; Richard Berg, MS§; Ann J. Linquist, BA§; Alayne J. Van Erem, MDʈ; and Lois R. Campbell, MD* ABSTRACT. Objective. The primary objective of this and insomnia were rated as worse by parents while chil- study was to determine the efficacy rate of Adderall in dren were receiving either dose of Adderall; headaches children newly diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperac- were rated as worse when children were receiving the tivity disorder (ADHD). A secondary objective was to higher dose of Adderall. Parents rated certain side ef- address the severity of side effects associated with fects, including staring/daydreaming, sadness, euphoria, Adderall treatment in children with ADHD using the and anxious/irritable, as worse during placebo regimens. Barkley Side Effects Questionnaire (BSEQ). Conclusions. We found that Adderall is highly effi- Design. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-con- cacious in our population of youth diagnosed with trolled crossover trial. ADHD. In addition, Adderall is well-tolerated with a Setting. A large rural tertiary care clinic. side effect profile similar to that reported for other Patients. Participants were prospectively recruited psychostimulants. Pediatrics 2001;107(1). URL: http:// from children 5 to 18 years of age referred for academic www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/107/1/e10; attention- and/or attention problems; 154 children who met the deficit/hyperactivity disorder, side effects, efficacy rate, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Adderall. Fourth Edition criteria for ADHD were enrolled. Interventions. Two doses of Adderall (0.15 mg/kg/ dose and 0.3 mg/kg/dose) were compared with placebo in ABBREVIATIONS. ADHD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disor- separate 2-week trials. Participants received each dosage der; ACTeRS, ADD-H Comprehensive Teachers’ Rating Scale; regimen twice daily for 7 consecutive days. CTRS-28, Conners’ Teachers’ Rating Scale (28 items); CPRS-48, Measurements and Main Results. Efficacy rates were Conners’ Parent Rating Scale (48 items); BSEQ, Barkley Side Ef- fects Questionnaire; CBCL, Child Behavior Checklist; SD, stan- determined by comparing Adderall with placebo during dard deviation. the low-dose crossover sequence and also during the high-dose crossover sequence. The criteria that defined a positive response to Adderall relative to placebo (with ttention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) each patient serving as their own control) included an is the most commonly diagnosed neurobe- indication of response by at least 1 of 2 parent measures havioral disorder of childhood and is esti- of children’s behavior or at least 2 of 5 teacher measures A 1 mated to affect 5% to 11% of school-aged children. of children’s behavior. The Adderall efficacy rate was determined based on parent criteria alone, teacher crite- Although various specialists may be involved in the ria alone, and by a more stringent definition of response care of children with ADHD during the continuum that required concurrence between parent and teacher of diagnosis and management, the primary care phy- criteria. The Adderall response rate in this study ranged sician frequently performs the initial evaluation of a from 59% when requiring concurrence between parent child with the disorder. Therefore, pediatricians and teacher observers, to 82% when based on parent should be cognizant of the efficacy rates and side criteria alone. Overall, 137 of 154 participants (89%) effect profiles of all currently available psychostimu- showed a positive response by either the parent or lant medications. teacher response criteria. Parents completed a modified version of the BSEQ Psychostimulants have served as the primary during each week of the trial. Appetite, stomachaches, mode of treatment of ADHD with reported efficacy rates of ϳ70%.2 For the past 2 decades, methylpheni- date (Ritalin, Novartis, East Hanover, NJ) and dex- ʈ From the Departments of *Neurology, ‡Neuropsychology, and Pediatrics, troamphetamine (Dexedrine, SmithKline Beecham, Marshfield Clinic, and the Department of §Clinical Research, Marshfield Medical Research Foundation, Marshfield, Wisconsin. Philadelphia, PA; DextroStat, Shire Richwood Inc, Preliminary results of this study were presented at the following meetings: Florence, KY) have been used for the management of American Academy of Neurology; April 6, 1999; Toronto, Canada; Child ADHD. A product comprised of mixed amphet- Neurology Society; October 22–24, 1998; Montreal, Canada; CHADD’s An- amine salts (Adderall, Shire Richwood Inc) has been nual International Conference on ADHD; October 15–17, 1999; Washington, DC; and the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry; marketed for the treatment of ADHD since 1994. October 21, 1999; Chicago, IL. Abstract of preliminary results was published Each Adderall tablet contains equal milligram por- in Neurology. 1999;52(suppl 2):A154 tions of d-amphetamine saccharate, d,l-amphetamine Received for publication Feb 10, 2000; accepted Sep 7, 2000. aspartate, d-amphetamine sulfate, and d,l-amphet- Reprint requests to (P.A.A.) Department of Neurology, Marshfield Clinic, 3 1000 N Oak Ave, Marshfield, WI 54449. E-mail: [email protected] amine sulfate. This combination of salts and isomers 4 PEDIATRICS (ISSN 0031 4005). Copyright © 2001 by the American Acad- results in a 3:1 ratio of dextro to levoamphetamine. emy of Pediatrics. In Ͼ4000 patients with ADHD enrolled in an open- http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/107/1/Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/newse10 by PEDIATRICSguest on September Vol. 24,107 2021 No. 1 January 2001 1of11 label trial of Adderall, reported side effects were ticipants 7 years of age and younger were given a modified typical of other psychostimulant medications and “Assent Form” to sign, written in age-appropriate language. At the time of initial appointment, an extensive medical history included decreased appetite, insomnia, and head- form was completed by the family. The Child Behavior Checklist 4 aches. No research has been conducted to address (CBCL)18 served as an initial screening measure for comorbid the differences between mixed salts of amphetamine conditions during this portion of the examination. The results of and dextroamphetamine spansules. the CBCL are given in Table 1. The physician and the neuropsy- The prevalence of ADHD among school-aged chil- chologist each interviewed the family independently, framing their interview questions around the 18 behavioral items from the dren as well as the recently recognized persistence of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition the disorder into adolescence and adulthood requir- criteria for ADHD. The physician also completed a physical and ing long-term treatment with psychostimulant med- neurological examination. The neuropsychologist evaluated the ications have contributed to the inclusion of Adderall patient for comorbid disorders of mood, anxiety, and conduct. Consultation then occurred between the physician and neuropsy- in the “Top 200” list of most frequently prescribed chologist regarding their findings. Both physician and neuropsy- 5 medications in the United States. Recent compara- chologist reviewed the results from previsit questionnaires sent to tive trials indicate that Adderall is at least as effica- the family (CTRS, CPRS, and ACTeRS) to ensure that the results cious as Ritalin.6–10 Potential advantages to the use were consistent with eligibility criteria. (See Table 2 for these of Adderall in the treatment of ADHD include baseline test data.) To be categorized as either ADHD subtype impulsive or com- the following: a longer duration of action than bined (impulsive and inattentive), at least 3 of the following 5 Ritalin6; a dose-dependent duration of action8; a re- criteria had to be met: duction in the need for in-school dosing of a psycho- 9–11 1. ACTeRS Attention Score at or below the 25th percentile; stimulant ; and a smoother course of clinical ac- 2. ACTeRS Hyperactivity Score at or below the 25th percentile; 12 tion. At the conclusion of a comparison trial of 3. CTRS-28 Inattention/Passivity Scale 2 or more standard devi- Adderall and Ritalin, Pelham and colleagues6 recom- ations (SDs) above the mean; mended Adderall by a ratio of 3:1 for continued 4. CTRS-28 Hyperactivity Index 2 or more SDs above the mean; medication treatment in children with ADHD. How- 5. CPRS-48 Hyperactivity Index 2 or more SDs above the mean. ever, review of the literature reveals that no study To be categorized as ADHD subtype inattentive, the child had involving large numbers of children in a naturalistic to also meet at least 2 of the following 3 criteria: setting has systematically and prospectively ad- 1. ACTeRS Attention Score at or below the 25th percentile; dressed efficacy rates and side effects associated with 2. CTRS-28 Inattention/Passivity scale Ͼ1.5 SDs above the mean; this mixture of amphetamine salts, compared with 3. Teacher narrative that suggests problems with careless mis- placebo in a randomized, double-blind manner. takes, organization skills, maintenance of routines, loss of ma- terials, and failure to finish work. This prospective study was initiated in 1997 to determine the efficacy rate and side effect profile of Children with a history of seizures, mental retardation, or other Adderall in the treatment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • EL PASO INTELLIGENCE CENTER DRUG TREND Synthetic Stimulants Marketed As Bath Salts
    LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE EPIC Tactical Intelligence Bulletins EL PASO INTELLIGENCE CENTER DRUG TREND TACTICAL INTELLIGENCE BULLETIN EB11-16 ● Synthetic Stimulants Marketed as Bath Salts ● March 8, 2011 This document is the property of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and is marked Law Enforcement Sensitive (LES). Further dissemination of this document is strictly forbidden except to other law enforcement agencies for criminal law enforcement purposes. The following information must be handled and protected accordingly. Summary Across the United States, synthetic stimulants that are sold as “bath salts”¹ have become a serious drug abuse threat. These products are produced under a variety of faux brand names, and they are indirectly marketed as legal alternatives to cocaine, amphetamine, and Ecstasy (MDMA or 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine). Poison control centers nationwide have received hundreds of calls related to the side-effects of, and overdoses from, the use of these potent and unpredictable products. Numerous media reports have cited bath salt stimulant overdose incidents that have resulted in emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and severe psychotic episodes, some of which, have led to violent outbursts, self-inflicted wounds, and even suicides. A number of states have imposed emergency measures to ban bath salt stimulant products (or the chemicals in them) including Florida, Louisiana, North Dakota, and West Virginia; and similar measures are pending in Hawaii, Kentucky, Michigan, and Mississippi. A prominent U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Subchronic Continuous Phencyclidine Administration Potentiates Amphetamine-Induced Frontal Cortex Dopamine Release
    Neuropsychopharmacology (2003) 28, 34–44 & 2003 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0893-133X/03 $25.00 www.neuropsychopharmacology.org Subchronic Continuous Phencyclidine Administration Potentiates Amphetamine-Induced Frontal Cortex Dopamine Release Andrea Balla1, Henry Sershen1,2, Michael Serra1, Rajeth Koneru1 and Daniel C Javitt*,1,2 1 2 Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA Functional dopaminergic hyperactivity is a key feature of schizophrenia. Etiology of this dopaminergic hyperactivity, however, is unknown. We have recently demonstrated that subchronic phencyclidine (PCP) treatment in rodents induces striatal dopaminergic hyperactivity similar to that observed in schizophrenia. The present study investigates the ability of PCP to potentiate amphetamine-induced dopamine release in prefrontal cortex (PFC) and nucleus accumbens (NAc) shell. Prefrontal dopaminergic hyperactivity is postulated to underlie cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia. In contrast, the degree of NAc involvement is unknown and recent studies have suggested that PCP-induced hyperactivity in rodents may correlate with PFC, rather than NAc, dopamine levels. Rats were treated with 5–20 mg/kg/day PCP for 3–14 days by osmotic minipump. PFC and NAc dopamine release to amphetamine challenge (1 mg/kg) was monitored by in vivo microdialysis and HPLC-EC. Doses of 10 mg/kg/day and above produced serum PCP concentrations (50–150 ng/ml) most associated with PCP psychosis in humans. PCP-treated rats showed significant, dose-dependent enhancement in amphetamine-induced dopamine release in PFC but not NAc, along with significantly enhanced locomotor activity. Enhanced response was observed following 3-day, as well as 14-day, treatment and resolved within 4 days of PCP treatment withdrawal.
    [Show full text]
  • (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub
    US 20130289061A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/0289061 A1 Bhide et al. (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 31, 2013 (54) METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS TO Publication Classi?cation PREVENT ADDICTION (51) Int. Cl. (71) Applicant: The General Hospital Corporation, A61K 31/485 (2006-01) Boston’ MA (Us) A61K 31/4458 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. (72) Inventors: Pradeep G. Bhide; Peabody, MA (US); CPC """"" " A61K31/485 (201301); ‘4161223011? Jmm‘“ Zhu’ Ansm’ MA. (Us); USPC ......... .. 514/282; 514/317; 514/654; 514/618; Thomas J. Spencer; Carhsle; MA (US); 514/279 Joseph Biederman; Brookline; MA (Us) (57) ABSTRACT Disclosed herein is a method of reducing or preventing the development of aversion to a CNS stimulant in a subject (21) App1_ NO_; 13/924,815 comprising; administering a therapeutic amount of the neu rological stimulant and administering an antagonist of the kappa opioid receptor; to thereby reduce or prevent the devel - . opment of aversion to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Also (22) Flled' Jun‘ 24’ 2013 disclosed is a method of reducing or preventing the develop ment of addiction to a CNS stimulant in a subj ect; comprising; _ _ administering the CNS stimulant and administering a mu Related U‘s‘ Apphcatlon Data opioid receptor antagonist to thereby reduce or prevent the (63) Continuation of application NO 13/389,959, ?led on development of addiction to the CNS stimulant in the subject. Apt 27’ 2012’ ?led as application NO_ PCT/US2010/ Also disclosed are pharmaceutical compositions comprising 045486 on Aug' 13 2010' a central nervous system stimulant and an opioid receptor ’ antagonist.
    [Show full text]
  • Methylphenidate Versus Dexamphetamine in Children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: a Double-Blind, Crossover Trial
    Methylphenidate Versus Dexamphetamine in Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Double-blind, Crossover Trial Daryl Efron, FRACP; Frederick Jarman, FRACP; and Melinda Barker, Grad Dip Ed Psych ABSTRACT. Objective. To compare methylphenidate behavioral, academic, and social functioning. Many (MPH) and dexamphetamine (DEX) in a sample of chil- well-designed, placebo-controlled studies have dem- dren with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder onstrated beyond doubt the benefits of stimulants in (ADHD). the vast majority of children with ADHD.2–4 In a Method. A total of 125 children with ADHD received review of 110 studies on the effects of stimulant both MPH (0.3 mg/kg twice daily) and DEX (0.15 mg/kg drugs on more than 4200 children with ADHD, twice daily) for 2 weeks a double-blind, crossover study. 4 ; Outcome measures were Conners’ Parent Rating Scale– Barkley found that 75% of subjects were regarded Revised, Conners’ Teacher Rating Scale–Revised, a Par- as improved on stimulants. The mean placebo re- ent Global Perceptions questionnaire, the Continuous sponse was 39%. Performance Test, and the Barkley Side Effects Rating Methylphenidate (MPH) and dexamphetamine Scale. (DEX) are the two stimulants prescribed most fre- Results. There were significant group mean im- quently and have been shown to have similar types provements from baseline score on all measures for of positive effects in children with ADHD. However, both stimulants. On the Conners’ Teacher Rating Scal- it is not known whether one is more efficacious than e–Revised, response was greater on MPH than DEX on the other in terms of probability of producing a the conduct problems and hyperactivity factors, as well positive response, magnitude of response, quality of as on the hyperactivity index.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs
    Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES • Public Health Service • Alcohol Drug Abuse and Mental Health Administration Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs Editors: Khursheed Asghar, Ph.D. Division of Preclinical Research National Institute on Drug Abuse Errol De Souza, Ph.D. Addiction Research Center National Institute on Drug Abuse NIDA Research Monograph 94 1989 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration National Institute on Drug Abuse 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC 20402 Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs ACKNOWLEDGMENT This monograph is based upon papers and discussion from a technical review on pharmacology and toxicology of amphetamine and related designer drugs that took place on August 2 through 4, 1988, in Bethesda, MD. The review meeting was sponsored by the Biomedical Branch, Division of Preclinical Research, and the Addiction Research Center, National Institute on Drug Abuse. COPYRIGHT STATUS The National Institute on Drug Abuse has obtained permission from the copyright holders to reproduce certain previously published material as noted in the text. Further reproduction of this copyrighted material is permitted only as part of a reprinting of the entire publication or chapter. For any other use, the copyright holder’s permission is required. All other matieral in this volume except quoted passages from copyrighted sources is in the public domain and may be used or reproduced without permission from the Institute or the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Methamphetamine (Canadian Drug Summary)
    www.ccsa.ca • www.ccdus.ca March 2020 Canadian Drug Summary Methamphetamine Key Points • The prevalence of methamphetamine use in the Canadian population is low (~0.2%). • Several jurisdictions report at least a three-fold increase in the use of methamphetamine over the past five years among individuals accessing treatment or harm reduction services. • Notable increases for rates of criminal violations involving methamphetamine have been observed in the last five years (2013–2018). Introduction Methamphetamine is a synthetic drug classified as a central nervous system (CNS) stimulant or psychostimulant. CNS stimulants cover a wide range of substances that act on the body by increasing the level of activity of the CNS and include caffeine, nicotine, amphetamine (e.g., Adderall®), methylphenidate (e.g., Ritalin®), MDMA (“ecstasy”), cocaine (including crack cocaine) and methamphetamine (including crystal meth).1,2 While both methamphetamine and amphetamine are psychostimulants and often grouped together, they are different drugs. A slight chemical modification of amphetamine produces methamphetamine, which has a different pharmacological profile that results in a larger release of certain neurochemicals in the brain and a stronger and more rapid physiological response. Some amphetamines are prescribed in Canada for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and narcolepsy (e.g., Adderall and Vyvanse®), but methamphetamine use is currently illegal. Methamphetamine is often made in illegal, clandestine laboratories with commonly available, inexpensive chemicals, such as ephedrine and pseudoephedrine, found in medications, among other sources. The use of these medications as precursor chemicals for methamphetamine led to stricter regulations introduced in Canada in 2006, limiting access to them by requiring they be kept behind the counter of pharmacies.3 Illegal production can be dangerous due to the toxicity of the chemicals used and the high risk of explosions.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphetamine/Dextroamphetamine IR Generic
    GEORGIA MEDICAID FEE-FOR-SERVICE STIMULANT AND RELATED AGENTS PA SUMMARY Preferred Non-Preferred Amphetamine/dextroamphetamine IR generic Adzenys ER (amphetamine ER oral suspension) Armodafinil generic Adzenys XR (amphetamine ER dispersible tab) Atomoxetine generic Amphetamine/dextroamphetamine ER (generic Concerta (methylphenidate ER/SA) Adderall XR) Dextroamphetamine IR tablets generic Aptensio XR (methylphenidate ER) Focalin (dexmethylphenidate) Clonidine ER generic Focalin XR (dexmethylphenidate ER) Cotempla XR (methylphenidate ER disintegrating Guanfacine ER generic tablet) Methylin oral solution (methylphenidate) Daytrana (methylphenidate TD patch) Methylphenidate CD/CR/ER generic by Lannett Desoxyn (methamphetamine) [NDCs 00527-####-##] and Kremers Urban [NDCs Dexmethylphenidate IR generic 62175-####-##] (generic Metadate CD) Dexmethylphenidate ER generic Methylphenidate IR generic Dextroamphetamine ER capsules generic Modafinil generic Dextroamphetamine oral solution generic Quillichew ER (methylphenidate ER chew tabs) Dyanavel XR (amphetamine ER oral suspension) Quillivant XR (methylphenidate ER oral suspension) Evekeo (amphetamine tablets) Vyvanse (lisdexamfetamine) Methamphetamine generic Zenzedi 5 mg, 10 mg IR tablets (dextroamphetamine) Methylphenidate IR chewable tablets generic Methylphenidate ER/SA (generic Concerta) Methylphenidate ER/LA/SR (generic Ritalin LA, Ritalin SR, Metadate ER) Methylphenidate ER/SA 72 mg generic Methylphenidate oral solution generic Mydayis (amphetamine/dextroamphetamine ER) Ritalin LA 10 mg
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Mephedrone and Amphetamine Exposure During Adolescence on Spatial Memory in Adulthood: Behavioral and Neurochemical Analysis
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Effects of Mephedrone and Amphetamine Exposure during Adolescence on Spatial Memory in Adulthood: Behavioral and Neurochemical Analysis Pawel Grochecki 1, Irena Smaga 2 , Malgorzata Lopatynska-Mazurek 1, Ewa Gibula-Tarlowska 1, Ewa Kedzierska 1, Joanna Listos 1, Sylwia Talarek 1, Marta Marszalek-Grabska 3 , Magdalena Hubalewska-Mazgaj 2, Agnieszka Korga-Plewko 4 , Jaroslaw Dudka 5, Zbigniew Marzec 6, Małgorzata Filip 2 and Jolanta H. Kotlinska 1,* 1 Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics, Medical University, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] (P.G.); [email protected] (M.L.-M.); [email protected] (E.G.-T.); [email protected] (E.K.); [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (S.T.) 2 Department of Drug Addiction Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-343 Krakow, Poland; [email protected] (I.S.); [email protected] (M.H.-M.); mal.fi[email protected] (M.F.) 3 Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University, 20-090 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] 4 Independent Medical Biology Unit, Medical University, 20-090 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] 5 Department of Toxicology, Medical University, 20-090 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] 6 Department of Food and Nutrition, Medical University, 20-093 Lublin, Poland; [email protected] Citation: Grochecki, P.; Smaga, I.; * Correspondence: [email protected] Lopatynska-Mazurek, M.; Gibula-Tarlowska, E.; Kedzierska, E.; Abstract: A synthetic cathinone, mephedrone is widely abused by adolescents and young adults. Listos, J.; Talarek, S.; Despite its widespread use, little is known regarding its long-term effects on cognitive function.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Ritalin and Adderall: Efficacy and Time-Course in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
    A Comparison of Ritalin and Adderall: Efficacy and Time-course in Children With Attention-deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder William E. Pelham, PhD*; Helen R. Aronoff, MD‡; Jill K. Midlam, MA*; Cheri J. Shapiro, PhD*; Elizabeth M. Gnagy, BS*; Andrea M. Chronis, BS*; Adia N. Onyango, BS*; Gregory Forehand, BS*; Anh Nguyen, BS*; and James Waxmonsky, MD‡ ABSTRACT. Objective. Very little research has fo- ratings were also made for evening behavior to assess cused on the efficacy of Adderall (Shire-Richwood Inc, possible rebound, and side effects ratings were obtained Florence, KY) in the treatment of children with attention- from parents, counselors, and teachers. Parents, counsel- deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and no studies ors, and teachers also rated their perceptions of medica- have compared it with standardized doses of Ritalin tion status and whether they recommended the contin- (Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ). It is ued use of the medication given that day. Finally, a thought that Adderall has a longer half-life than Ritalin clinical team made recommendations for treatment tak- and might minimize the loss of efficacy that occurs 4 or 5 ing into account each child’s individual response. hours after Ritalin ingestion. We compared two doses of Results. Both drugs were routinely superior to pla- Ritalin and Adderall in the treatment of ADHD in chil- cebo and produced dramatic improvements in rates of dren in an acute study and assessed the medications’ negative behavior, academic productivity, and staff/par- time courses. ent ratings of behavior. The doses of Adderall that were Design. Within-subject, double-blind, placebo-con- assessed produced greater improvement than did the as- trolled, crossover design lasting 6 weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • (Adhd) Quantity Limitation Utilization Management Criteria
    ATTENTION- DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER (ADHD) QUANTITY LIMITATION UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT CRITERIA DRUG CLASS: Stimulants and Non-Stimulants BRAND (generic) NAMES: Adderall® (amphetamine/dextroamphetamine) Adderall XR® (amphetamine/ dextroamphetamine ER) Adzenys XR-ODTTM (amphetamine ER dispersible) Aptensio XR® (methylphenidate ER) Concerta® (methylphenidate ER) Daytrana® (methylphenidate transdermal patch) Dextroampthetamine (DextroStat®) Dexedrine® (dextroamphetamine ER) DyanavelTM XR (amphetamine ER) Focalin XR® (dexmethylphenidate ER) Focalin® (dexmethylphenidate) Intuniv® (guanfacine ER) Kapvay® (clonidine ER) Metadate CD® (methylphenidate ER) Metadate ER® (methylphenidate ER) Methylin® (methylphenidate) Procentra® (dextroamphetamine) QuillichewTM (methylphenidate ER) Quillivant XR® (methylphenidate ER) Ritalin® (methylphenidate) Ritalin® LA (methylphenidate ER) Ritalin® SR (methylphenidate ER) Strattera® (atomoxetine) Vyvanse® (lisdexamphetamine) Zenzedi® (dextroamphetamine) COVERAGE AUTHORIZATION CRITERIA Non-formulary medications - Medications included in this criterion that are not part of ASO Net Results or Essential Formularies are subject to a trial and failure of up to TWO formulary alternatives that are clinically appropriate, to treat the same condition, prior to approval (see Non-formulary Exception Criteria for detailed limitations). Quantities above the program set limit (see pgs 2-4) for ADHD agents will be approved when the following is met: 1. The quantity (dose) requested is for documented titration purposes at the initiation of therapy (authorization for a 90 day titration period); AND 2. The prescribed dose cannot be achieved using a lesser quantity of a higher strength; AND 3. The quantity (dose) requested does not exceed the maximum FDA labeled dose, when specified, or to the safest studied dose per the manufacturer’s product insert; OR BLUE CROSS®, BLUE SHIELD® and the Cross and Shield Symbols are registered marks of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, an association of independent Blue Cross and Blue Shield Plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Ring-Substituted Amphetamine Interactions with Neurotransmitter Receptor Binding Sites in Human Cortex
    208 NeuroscienceLetters, 95 (1988) 208-212 Elsevier Scientific Publishers Ireland Ltd. NSL O5736 Ring-substituted amphetamine interactions with neurotransmitter receptor binding sites in human cortex Pamela A. Pierce and Stephen J. Peroutka Deparmentsof Neurologyand Pharmacology, Stanford University Medical Center, StanJbrd,CA 94305 (U.S.A.) (Received 31 May 1988; Revised version received 11 August 1988; Accepted 12 August 1988) Key words.' Ring-substituted amphetamine; (_+)-3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine; ( +_)-3,4-Methylene- dioxyethamphetamine; (_+)-3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine; Ecstasy; 4-Bromo-2,5- dimethoxyphenylisopropylamine binding site; Human cortical receptor The binding affinities of 3 ring-substituted amphetamine compounds were determined at 9 neurotrans- mitter binding sites in human cortex. (_+)-3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDAk (_+)-3,4-methylene- dioxyethamphetamine (MDE), and (_+)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA or 'Ecstasy') all display highest affinity (approximately 1 /tM) for the recently identified 'DOB binding site' labeled by ['TBr]R(-)4-bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenylisopropylamine ([77Br]R(-)DOB). MDA displays moderate affinity (4-5/iM) for the 5-hydroxytryptaminetA (5-HTr^), 5-HT_D,and =,-adrenergic sites in human cor- tex. MDE and MDMA display lower affinity or are inactive at all other sites tested in the present study. These observations are discussed in relation to the novel psychoactive effects of the ring-substituted amphetamines. A series of ring-substituted amphetamine derivatives exist which are structurally related to both amphetamines and hallucinogens. However, drugs such as (+)-3,4- methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), (_+)-3,4-methylenedioxyethamphetamine (MDE), and (+)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA or 'Ecstasy') ap- pear to produce unique psychoactive effects which are distinct from the effects of both amphetamines and hallucinogens [13, 15].
    [Show full text]
  • Stimulant and Related Medications: US Food and Drug
    Stimulant and Related Medications: U.S. Food and Drug Administration-Approved Indications and Dosages for Use in Adults The therapeutic dosing recommendations for stimulant and related medications are based on U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved product labeling. Nevertheless, the dosing regimen is adjusted according to a patient’s individual response to pharmacotherapy. The FDA-approved dosages and indications for the use of stimulant and related medications in adults are provided in this table. All medication doses listed are for oral administration. Information on the generic availability of the stimulant and related medications can be found by searching the Electronic Orange Book at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ob/default.cfm on the FDA website. Generic Medication Indication Dosing Information Other Information Availability amphetamine/dextroamphetamine ADHD Initial dose: May increase daily dose by 5 mg at Yes mixed salts[1] 5 mg once or twice a day; weekly intervals until optimal response Maximum dose: 40 mg per day is achieved. Only in rare cases will it be necessary to exceed a total of 40 mg per day. amphetamine/dextroamphetamine narcolepsy Initial dose: 10 mg per day; May increase daily dose by 10 mg at Yes mixed salts Usual dose: weekly intervals until optimal response 5 mg to 60 mg per day is achieved. Take first dose in divided doses upon awakening. amphetamine/dextroamphetamine ADHD Recommended dose: Patients switching from regular-release Yes mixed salts ER*[2] 20 mg once a day amphetamine/dextroamphetamine mixed salts may take the same total daily dose once a day. armodafinil[3] narcolepsy Recommended dose: Take as a single dose in the morning.
    [Show full text]